华硕ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM评测--带RTX 4070的游戏可转换笔记本电脑
华硕ROG Flow Z13是一款拥有强大处理器和专用显卡的游戏平板。除了配备Core i9-13900H的常规2023型号和目前也在评测中的GeForce RTX 4060笔记本电脑外,华硕还与德国时尚品牌ACRONYM合作推出了特别版,它获得了完全重新设计的机箱以及更强大的GeForce RTX 4070笔记本电脑。我们评测了这款游戏敞篷车,以了解,3400欧元的价格是否合理。这款敞篷车还配备了13.4英寸WQHD IPS屏幕,刷新率为165赫兹,32GB LPDDR5-RAM以及一个紧凑的1TB M.2-2230 SSD,可以更换。
也可以使用带有RTX 4090笔记本的外部华硕XG移动GPU的游戏敞篷车,但这是一个非常昂贵的选择,价格为2500欧元。在审查过程中,我们还将包括一些eGPU的基准测试。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.4 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 20 mm | 13.40" | 2560x1600 | |
86.8 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.2 kg | 12 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
86.7 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 14.5 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 16.8 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1440 | |
86.7 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800S | 1.7 kg | 19.5 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
机箱 - 福禄Z13,引人注目的铝制机箱
你可以立即看到,ACRNM特别版使用了与普通版完全不同的底盘。ROG Flow Z13.最引人注目的特征是CNC加工的铝制后盖,你可以真正看到机器去除材料的地方。华硕还加入了橡胶条,以获得更好的抓地力,并且在四角还有额外的材料。ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM几乎看起来像一个坚固的平板电脑,稳定性肯定会满足要求,但该设备也因此相当重,有1.7公斤(可折叠+键盘盖)。华硕也知道这一点,四个角也是附带的带子的连接点。它们可以用来把设备像袋子一样背在肩上,或者把它放在身体前面使用,下面的图片说明了这一点。
后部集成的脚架也给人留下了良好的印象,铰链也没有晃动。我们特别喜欢这样一个事实,即脚架的四角也经过了橡胶处理,这意味着不会有划痕,你甚至可以在纵向模式下使用这台可折叠机。
总而言之,ROG Flow Z13的ACRNM版绝对是一个非常引人注目的设计,不是每个人都会喜欢它。我们喜欢它,我们认为它适合该设备的定位。例如,不可能打开机箱清洁风扇,但你至少可以通过背面的维护舱口接触紧凑的M.2-2230固态硬盘。
我们已经提到了1.7公斤的高重量(平板电脑部分~1.3公斤),而且机箱也比普通的更大。ROG Flow Z13.紧凑的130W电源适配器的重量为565克。
连接性 - Thunderbolt和eGPU
Flow Z13仍然是一个可转换的产品,所以端口种类有限。然而,情况并没有那么糟糕,你有一个普通的USB-A端口和两个USB-C端口,以及外部GPU的连接器。这两个USB-C端口可以用来给可折叠机充电,它们还支持视频输出。
SD卡阅读器
华硕在脚架后面实现了一个microSD读卡器(弹簧机制),这很容易访问。当我们从参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60)复制图像文件时,我们测量的传输速率高达211 MB/s和190 MB/s。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) |
沟通
ROG Flow Z13使用目前的英特尔Wi-Fi模块AX211,它也支持最新的Wi-Fi 6E标准。然而,我们可以与华硕参考路由器的相应6GHz网络建立连接,但与5GHz网络的性能也非常好,很稳定。
Networking | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
网络摄像头
除了用于Windows Hello的500万像素红外摄像头外,华硕还在显示屏上边框中加入了一个新的1300万像素摄像头。与普通笔记本电脑中的普通720p甚至1080p摄像头相比,其画质要好得多。在我们的YouTube评论中,我们还包括了一个样本记录(视频和音频)。中,所以你可以对其性能有一个更好的印象。
输入设备 - 带有两个键盘的ROG Flow
华硕为ROG Flow z13 ACRNM版配备了两种不同的键盘盖,对于一款可转换的产品来说,这些键盘盖也相当重(358克)和厚。按照通常的做法,你可以在两个角度使用键盘,要么平放在表面,要么稍微倾斜。键盘出乎意料的结实,对于可拆卸键盘来说,键程也相当长。
键盘的设计和底盘一样不寻常,这就产生了一些问题,因为在日常工作中,当你不看就不能打字时,键盘上的额外符号会让人感到相当困惑。黑键的对比度不够,而附加的符号同时又有很高的对比度,这让人很恼火。在黑暗的环境中,这个问题就不存在了,因为键盘的照明只照亮重要的符号。
触摸板相当小,为10.5 x 6厘米,点击声音相当大,但它工作得很好。电容式触摸屏没有发现任何问题,你也可以用数字转换器来使用它。华硕为这台可折叠电脑配备了SA203手写笔(4096个压力级别),我们没有发现任何问题。
显示屏 - WQHD,165赫兹
华硕还升级了显示屏,我们的ACRNM版和普通版的ROG Flow Z13之间没有区别。两者都使用更高分辨率的WQHD面板(2560 x 1600像素,16:10),刷新率更高的165 Hz。主观的画质很好,动作非常流畅。我们还确定了快速的响应时间,没有PWM闪烁的迹象。我们的评测单元也没有出现大规模的背光渗漏问题。
我们确定平均亮度为455尼特,结合略微提高的黑值0.4,这导致对比度为1160:1。这是一个体面的结果,但所有基于IPS的对手(包括前辈),除了Razer Blade 14提供更好的对比度结果。面板亮度不能通过环境光传感器控制。
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 464 cd/m²
Contrast: 1160:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.17% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.92% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.94% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM TL134ADXP01-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4" | Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE LQ134N1JW54, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 SHP154D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX TL140BDXP02-0, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK NE140QDM-NX1 (BOE0A1D), IPS-Level, 2560x1600, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -17% | 2% | 0% | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 96.94 | 67.5 -30% | 99.6 3% | 97.2 0% | 97.4 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.92 | 97.1 -3% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.17 | 69.3 -19% | 87.6 3% | 85.7 1% | 85.5 0% |
Response Times | -1241% | -255% | -554% | -210% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.1 ? | 44 ? -1995% | 9.6 ? -357% | 16.8 ? -700% | 8.8 ? -319% |
Response Time Black / White * | 3 ? | 17.6 ? -487% | 7.6 ? -153% | 15.2 ? -407% | 6 ? -100% |
PWM Frequency | 27170 ? | ||||
Screen | 9% | -11% | 0% | -20% | |
Brightness middle | 464 | 515 11% | 434 -6% | 354 -24% | 480 3% |
Brightness | 455 | 476 5% | 411 -10% | 328 -28% | 456 0% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 87 -2% | 89 0% | 86 -3% | 80 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.35 12% | 0.25 37% | 0.37 7% | 0.48 -20% |
Contrast | 1160 | 1471 27% | 1736 50% | 957 -17% | 1000 -14% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2 | 1.6 20% | 3 -50% | 1.66 17% | 2.62 -31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.2 | 4 5% | 7.1 -69% | 3.83 9% | 6.71 -60% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.2 | 1.2 -0% | 0.7 42% | 1.12 7% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 2.5 7% | 5.1 -89% | 1.6 41% | 4.2 -56% |
Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.2 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.16 102% |
CCT | 6832 95% | 6939 94% | 6204 105% | 6542 99% | 7122 91% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -416% /
-175% | -88% /
-43% | -185% /
-85% | -77% /
-43% |
* ... smaller is better
我们用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro2)和Armoury Crate软件的原生色彩配置文件分析了该面板。当你想在较小的色彩空间工作时,也有一个专门的sRGB配置文件。开箱后的结果已经很不错了,只有少数颜色偏离了DeltaE-2000的目标值3。还有一个轻微的偏蓝现象,与略微偏冷的色温相结合,但这只有在与校准过的屏幕直接比较时才会明显。
我们自己的校准(相应的配置文件可以在上面的方框中免费下载)提高了灰度以及色彩表现的质量。只有100%的蓝色仍然是一个异类,但结合DCI-P3的高覆盖率,你仍然可以使用该面板进行一些图片和视频编辑。如果你只是想用Flow Z13玩游戏,其实没有必要对屏幕进行校准。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.1 ms rise | |
↘ 2.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
显然,你应该避免直接光源对光面触摸屏的反射,但它不像许多其他面板那样具有反射性,实际上你仍然可以在非常明亮的环境中使用这款敞篷车。IPS屏幕的可视角度稳定性非常好。
表演 - 猛禽湖和艾达-洛夫莱斯
2023年ROG Flow Z13的所有版本都配备了英特尔酷睿i9-13900H,但我们的ACRNM特别版还得到了新的NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑(65W版本)。我们的设备配备了32GB LPDDR5-5200内存以及1TB PCIe-4.0 SSD。
审查设置
我们已经从其他ROG设备中熟悉了Armoury Crate软件,它为电源模式和GPU的行为提供全面的设置。例如,可以完全停用iGPU。与其他ROG型号类似,我们注意到,当你连接外部屏幕时,专用GPU必须处于激活状态,这将增加日常情况下的功耗。我们在下表中列出了ROG的电源模式:
CPU负载 | GPU负载 | 压力测试 | 最大风扇噪音 | CB R23 Multi | Time Spy 显卡 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
静音 | 36/20 瓦特 | 35 瓦特 | CPU: 20 瓦特 GPU:35瓦特 |
36.5 dB(A) | 8207分 | 7344分 |
性能 | 100/55 瓦特 | 50 瓦特 | CPU:~35 瓦特 GPU:30 瓦特 |
43.4 dB(A) | 15557 分 | 8720 分 |
涡轮增压 | 100/65 瓦特 | 65 瓦特 | CPU:30-50瓦特 GPU:45 瓦特 |
46.9 dB(A) | 18682 分 | 9513 分 |
我们在基准测试和测量中使用了涡轮模式,以获得最大的GPU性能。请注意,Turbo模式只有在连接PSU时才能使用。我们还将看一下其他电源配置文件的风扇噪音。
处理器 - 酷睿i9-13900H
新的英特尔猛禽湖酷睿i9-13900H基本上是旧的酷睿i9-12900H基本上是前一版本的老酷睿i9-12900H,涡轮频率略有提高。该CPU在涡轮动力模式下,短时间内可消耗100瓦,持续工作负荷可消耗65瓦。这意味着我们离酷睿i9的最大潜力还相当遥远,但考虑到紧凑的尺寸,总体结果仍然非常好。电池功耗被限制在40瓦,这意味着你在多核情况下会损失约25%的CPU性能。请参阅我们的 技术部分了解更多基准测试。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro -6! | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11997 - 20385, n=28) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1297 - 2054, n=26) | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (4935 - 7716, n=25) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (428 - 792, n=25) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=195, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2061 - 3100, n=26) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=192, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (211 - 297, n=26) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (166 - 268, n=24) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (45045 - 79032, n=25) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3665 - 6600, n=25) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (9094 - 15410, n=26) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1140 - 2043, n=26) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (14.1 - 22.3, n=25) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (34.4 - 82.8, n=25) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (0.4052 - 0.723, n=25) | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6788 - 19557, n=25) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (22551 - 95579, n=25) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2491 - 4270, n=25) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (65121 - 120936, n=25) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6108 - 11631, n=25) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11283 - 48474, n=25) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3691 - 149377, n=25) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (789 - 1254, n=25) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3655 - 10716, n=25) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (10871 - 50488, n=25) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX |
系统性能
ROG Flow Z13的系统性能非常好,这一点得到了良好的基准分数以及我们的主观性能印象的支持。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=166, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (5855 - 8538, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=165, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8835 - 11940, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=165, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7967 - 10991, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=165, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7738 - 13575, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1104 - 1974, n=7) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1058 - 1914, n=7) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1178 - 2254, n=7) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1037 - 1952, n=7) |
PCMark 10 Score | 8018 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (37448 - 74486, n=25) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (41599 - 75433, n=25) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (36152 - 88505, n=25) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (75.8 - 102.3, n=25) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
我们的标准化延迟测试(网页浏览、YouTube 4K播放、CPU负载)显示当前BIOS版本存在一些问题,但也可能是Nvidia GPU驱动的结果(有报道称DPC延迟问题已有一段时间)。这种情况可能会随着未来的软件更新而改善。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
华硕使用了一个非常紧凑的M.2-2230 NVM-SSD,可以通过平板电脑后部的维护舱口进行访问和更换。我们的审查单位配备了1TB版本的西部数据SN740,这是一个现代PCIe 4.0驱动器,最大传输速率为5150 MB/s。这意味着它不是最快的驱动器,但它达到了宣传的性能,即使在持续的工作负荷下也很稳定。总而言之,对于紧凑型固态硬盘来说,这是一个不错的结果。更多的SSD基准测试被列在 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Disk throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
ACRNM版的ROG Flow Z13配备了新的NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop,而普通版则仅限于RTX 4060 笔记本电脑.虽然这两个型号都使用65W的变体,这意味着性能无法与这些GPU可以消耗100-110瓦的版本相提并论(它们在游戏过程中不需要更多的功率,更高的TGP数字对这些GPU来说是不重要的)。单独的GPU的TGP为50瓦,与处理器的15瓦动态提升相结合。
与RTX 3050 Ti相比,RTX 4070 Laptop显然是一个巨大的升级。RTX 3050 Ti相比,RTX 4070笔记本电脑显然是一个巨大的升级,在合成基准测试中,我们看到新机型的优势几乎达到了130%。另一方面,带有RTX 4060笔记本电脑的普通Flow Z13的速度要慢20%左右。与RTX4070笔记本电脑的最快版本相比,如它在Gigabyte Aero 16中,65W型号的速度要慢20%左右,而最快的RTX 4060笔记本(MSI Katana 17例如)也要快一点。然而,65W RTX 4070 笔记本电脑仍然领先于旧的RTX 3070 Ti和Razer Blade 14中的RTX 3070 Ti。RTX 3060中的Alienware x14.如果你投资于XG移动电子GPU与RTX 4090 笔记本电脑(最大TGP为150W),你可以将GPU的性能几乎翻倍。
如果考虑到小的外形尺寸,整体的GPU性能非常好,而且在持续的工作负荷下性能也非常稳定(Time Spy 压力测试:96.3 %)。虽然在电池供电的情况下,GPU的功耗被限制在35瓦,这导致性能下降了约25%。更多的GPU基准测试可在我们的 技术部分.
3DMark 11 Performance | 29603 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 20875 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 9917 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18 - 30, n=64) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 181, n=66) | |
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301V | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (158 - 440, n=63) |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
游戏性能也非常好,你也可以在原生QHD分辨率下以最大的细节玩现代游戏。不过,光线追踪往往会有太大的挑战,所以你必须使用升频。配备65W版本RTX 4070笔记本电脑的Flow Z13再次落后于最强大版本的RTX 4070笔记本电脑和4060笔记本电脑,但保持在RTX 3070 Ti之前。你再一次要考虑到紧凑的外形,在较长的游戏时间内,游戏性能也很稳定。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 -1! | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 220, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Gaming (37.7 - 116, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (30 - 63.9, n=24) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 - 2560x1440 Extreme Quality Preset AA:T2X Filmic SM | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Gaming (47 - 137, n=31, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (59 - 77, n=9) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM |
Far Cry 6 - 2560x1440 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (32.6 - 146, n=22, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (70 - 91, n=10) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
GTA V - 2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (36.9 - 160.6, n=110, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (36.9 - 102.2, n=49) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM |
Spider-Man Miles Morales - 2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM | |
Average of class Gaming (53.1 - 115.7, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (53.1 - 86, n=3) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM |
Witcher 3 FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 182.2 | 175.4 | 165.8 | 94.8 | 75.9 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 83.2 | |||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 171 | 152.5 | 142.8 | 135 | 107 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 128.2 | 93.3 | 71.6 | 40.3 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 165.7 | 141.8 | 110.3 | 103.4 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 393 | 249 | 202 | 174.8 | 122.8 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 117 | 86 | ||||
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) | 86 | 65 | ||||
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 92 | 70 | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 71.62 | 53.88 | ||||
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 79.7 | 57.61 | ||||
F1 22 (2022) | 192.3 | 190 | 163 | 61.8 | 40.9 | |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 80 | 59 | ||||
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) | 82.3 | 53.1 |
排放 - 扬声器较弱
系统噪音
华硕使用了两个风扇,液态金属用于更好地散热,以及用于冷却解决方案的蒸汽室。风扇的噪音主要取决于你所选择的功率配置,我们不建议在日常工作中使用涡轮模式,因为在这种模式下,当风扇开始旋转时,会立即跳到37分贝(A)。静音模式更适合于轻度工作负荷,而且更安静。与旧的ROG Flow Z13相比,风扇在负载下的声音普遍较大。配备RTX 3050 Ti的ROG Flow Z13。.风扇杂音本身并不令人讨厌,但在较高的风扇速度下你会注意到轻微的振动。我们在下面的表格中列出了不同电源模式下的噪音结果:
静音 | 性能 | 涡轮增压 | |
---|---|---|---|
平均负载 | 31.3 dB(A) | 40.6 dB(A) | 41.3 dB(A) |
Witcher 3 超级设置 | 35.7 dB(A) | 40.6 dB(A) | 44.7 dB(A) |
压力测试 | 36.5 dB(A) | 43.4 dB(A) | 46.9 dB(A) |
我们还注意到,当设备处于待机状态并连接了电源适配器时,有一种高亢的噪音。它很安静,但绝对是明显的、令人讨厌的。华硕应该看一下这个问题。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 36.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 41.3 / 46.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 | Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK | Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 7% | -2% | 11% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 24.5 -2% | 24.7 -3% | 23.3 3% | 24 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 24 | 24.5 -2% | 24.7 -3% | 23.3 3% | 24 -0% |
Idle Average * | 24 | 24.5 -2% | 24.7 -3% | 23.3 3% | 26 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 36.5 | 24.5 33% | 30.9 15% | 23.3 36% | 31 15% |
Load Average * | 41.3 | 41 1% | 40 3% | 34.7 16% | 45 -9% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.7 | 41 8% | 51.5 -15% | 42.1 6% | 43 4% |
Load Maximum * | 46.9 | 41 13% | 51.5 -10% | 42.1 10% | 45 4% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
华硕对Flow Z13 ACRNM的表面温度管理得非常好,更庞大的机箱对结果肯定有积极影响。该设备在轻度工作负荷的情况下非常凉爽,你仍然可以在最大负荷下作为平板电脑使用,没有任何限制。我们可以测量到背部高达约42°C的温度,与前代产品相比,这是一个明显的改进。 前代产品RTX 3050 Ti(高达48℃)。
在我们的压力测试中,性能也很好。GPU保持在45瓦特,处理器的消耗在30-50瓦特之间波动。在电池供电的情况下,CPU的这些数值下降到18W,GPU的数值下降到26W。我们没有注意到压力测试后立即出现性能下降。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.2 °C / 95.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.3 °C / -11.4 F).
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800S | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -12% | -8% | -21% | -24% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42.5 | 45.3 -7% | 51.3 -21% | 40.6 4% | 55 -29% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42.6 | 48.3 -13% | 44.4 -4% | 42.6 -0% | 55 -29% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.2 | 29.2 -11% | 27.2 -4% | 38 -45% | 30 -15% |
Idle Bottom * | 26 | 30 -15% | 26.6 -2% | 37 -42% | 32 -23% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个立体声扬声器绝对是敞篷车的一个弱点,因为声音很薄,缺乏低音。无论是音乐、电影还是游戏都不那么令人愉快,而且在游戏过程中还会有风扇噪音,所以我们建议使用耳机。
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--165赫兹成本运行时间
消耗功率
怠速时的功耗与老式的流动Z13但新版本在负载下需要更多的功率。我们在游戏过程中测量了约100瓦特,但在压力测试开始时,该设备需要的功率超过了最高133.6瓦特。该系统在最初的几秒钟内也会从电池中吸取4-18瓦特,但随后的消耗会平息在115瓦特左右。这是一个极端的情况,所附的130瓦电源适配器在其他方面是足够的。
Off / Standby | 0.74 / 1.02 Watt |
Idle | 8.9 / 12.6 / 13 Watt |
Load |
92.5 / 133.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4" | Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800S, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK, IPS-Level, 2560x1600, 14" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 13% | 1% | -58% | -24% | -47% | -62% | |
Idle Minimum * | 8.9 | 8.8 1% | 7.9 11% | 10.2 -15% | 7 21% | 12.4 ? -39% | 13.5 ? -52% |
Idle Average * | 12.6 | 12.1 4% | 11.1 12% | 26 -106% | 14 -11% | 17.5 ? -39% | 18.9 ? -50% |
Idle Maximum * | 13 | 12.7 2% | 11.8 9% | 26.7 -105% | 22 -69% | 24.2 ? -86% | 26.7 ? -105% |
Load Average * | 92.5 | 72.3 22% | 107.4 -16% | 89.3 3% | 98 -6% | 97.6 ? -6% | 106.3 ? -15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 104.4 | 77.3 26% | 111 -6% | 158.7 -52% | 141 -35% | ||
Load Maximum * | 133.6 | 103.1 23% | 140.4 -5% | 227.5 -70% | 188 -41% | 222 ? -66% | 249 ? -86% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with external screen
电池运行时间
电池容量仍然是56Wh,我们确定在60赫兹下的运行时间超过6.5小时(165赫兹下约5.5小时),我们的Wi-Fi测试的调整亮度为150尼特(我们评测设备的最大亮度的52%)。在最大亮度下,我们的Wi-Fi测试在60赫兹下运行5小时多一点,在165赫兹下运行4小时多一点。这些结果显然不是很好,但考虑到强大的硬件和相对较小的电池,也不令人惊讶。当你进行一次较长的旅行时,你肯定应该包括一些充电站。当设备打开时,从5-60%充电只需要大约30分钟;完全充电需要大约80分钟。
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 56 Wh | Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 62 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800S, 76 Wh | Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 56 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 34% | 61% | 23% | 13% | 30% | |
H.264 | 312 | 561 80% | 358 15% | 409 ? 31% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 398 | 535 34% | 571 43% | 572 44% | 338 -15% | 375 ? -6% |
Load | 52 | 45 -13% | 93 79% | 53 2% | 72 38% | 85.6 ? 65% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 45 | 47 | 78.3 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM的设计和性能令人印象深刻
去年的ROG Flow Z13已经是一个相当独特的产品,配备了Core i9-12900H和GeForce RTX 3050 Ti,但2023年的模型是一个巨大的改进,特别是在GPU性能方面。我们的ACRNM特别版配备了新的GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop,它在原生QHD分辨率的现代游戏中没有问题。酷睿i9-13900H再次是一个非常强大的处理器,但特别版最引人注目的方面显然是机箱设计,CNC加工的后盖以及角落里的额外材料,包括带子的连接点。我们喜欢这样的设计,而且这款敞篷车非常坚固--几乎就像一个坚固的设备,这也反映在它1.7公斤的高重量上(包括键盘盖)。
ACRNM版的键盘盖也不同于普通的ROG Flow Z13而且你甚至可以得到两种不同的型号。不过你必须区分到方面。两种键盘盖都比普通版厚一些,这对稳定性有好处,到目前为止,我们从未评测过打字体验这么好的可拆卸键盘。另一方面,字体和对比度(或缺乏对比度)是一场灾难,设计显然比人体工程学更重要。如果你不盲目地打字,这将是一个问题。
华硕ROG Flow Z13的ACRNM版是一款非常强大的游戏敞篷车,具有引人注目的设计。由于新的RTX 4070笔记本电脑,它甚至可以处理WQHD屏幕上的现代游戏。
这款笔记本的性能RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的性能很好,但你必须记住,这只是65W的版本。配备RTX 4070笔记本电脑甚至RTX 4060笔记本电脑的更大的游戏笔记本电脑将提供更多的性能,但考虑到福禄克Z13的紧凑尺寸,整体性能仍然很好,而且比以前的型号也有巨大的改进。在涡轮模式下,风扇的声音非常大,而且有轻微的振动。我们还注意到待机时有高亢的声音。
该显示屏现在具有165赫兹的WQHD分辨率,用于ACRNM以及普通版本的Flow Z13。总而言之,IPS屏幕以其高频率和快速的响应时间为游戏留下了良好的印象。它还可以处理图片编辑,我们没有发现任何PWM闪烁。
遗憾的是,普通的ROG Flow Z13只适用于RTX 4060笔记本电脑(或4050笔记本电脑和RTX 2050笔记本电脑,分别),但它们也都是65W版本,所以这种限制是没有必要的。普通版的设计更加保守,对一些用户更有吸引力。我们现在也在评测带有RTX 4060笔记本电脑的普通版,评测结果将很快公布。我们完美的ROG Flow Z13将使用普通机箱与RTX 4070笔记本电脑,以及ACRNM版的更厚的键盘盖,但没有多余的字母。在可转换市场内仍然几乎没有任何竞争者ROG Flow Z13,你必须获得一个14英寸的游戏笔记本,以获得相当的性能水平。
价格和可用性
ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM可以在华硕电子商店,价格为2499美元。.
Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM
- 04/09/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.