
配备 RTX 5090 和 64 GB 内存的超薄游戏笔记本电脑 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 评测
Arrow Lake 和 240 Hz OLED。
华硕更新了其超薄型 ROG Zephyrus G16 游戏笔记本电脑。对于 2025 机型,顶级版本将配备箭湖处理器和新的GeForce RTX 5090。内存仍为焊接式,但最大内存容量增加了一倍,达到 64 GB。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
评语 - ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 仍是一款非常适合移动的游戏机
ROG Zephyrus G16 的 2025 更新提供了多项升级。由于采用了箭湖处理器和全新的GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU,其整体性能也有所提升。不过,我们仍然有必要知道,它使用的是相对较慢的 GPU 版本。其他改进还包括 Wi-Fi 7、64 GB 内存和更长的电池续航时间。输入设备和扬声器依然非常出色。
薄弱环节仍然是显示屏盖(在我们的评测机型上产生的嘎吱声微乎其微)和铰链,它们无法防止明显的摇晃。我们希望 2025 型号能在这方面有所改进。华硕还应该重新考虑空闲运行时风扇发出的轻微脉动噪音。OLED 面板仍然是游戏的最佳选择,但最大 HDR 亮度仍然很低。
我们的高端评测机型售价为 4600 美元,非常昂贵,甚至超过了 雷蛇刀锋 16的主要竞争对手。我们将在另一篇文章中详细比较这两款设备,但总体而言,ROG Zephyrus G16 更像是一款高端多媒体或全能设备。而 Blade 16 则专注于在紧凑的机身中提供尽可能高的游戏性能,两款设备各有优缺点。
Pros
Cons
价格和可用性
在我们进行评测时,新款 ROG Zephyrus G16 还未在亚马逊或百思买等在线商店上架。
2025 年,华硕更新了其 ROG Zephyrus G16 游戏笔记本,配备了 Nvidia 最新的 RTX 5000 笔记本 GPU。目前仍有两款基本型号:一款配备 AMD 处理器和传统散热装置,笔记本 GPU 最高可达 RTX 5070。在此基础上,还有配备英特尔 CPU 和蒸气室冷却系统的型号,其最高配置为GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU,TGP 为 120 瓦。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
与 ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 的区别
华硕在 2025 年的机型中保留了不变的深灰色金属机身,这也是 ROG Zephyrus G16 继续成为一款纤薄、尤其是相对轻巧的 16 英寸游戏笔记本电脑的原因所在。 雷蛇刀锋 16 2025它同样轻薄,但却重了约 200 克。
机箱质量和稳定性都很出色,但盖子仍然是一个弱点,存在可听到的最小吱吱声。即使是铰链也无法避免明显的晃动。机箱内部,蒸发室的布局只做了极小的改动,但维护选项并没有改变。提供两个 M.2 2280 插槽,必要时可更换 Wi-Fi 模块和电池。
Wi-Fi 模块(英特尔 BE201)现在支持 Wi-Fi 7 标准,传输速度不错,但缺少 Thunderbolt 5 或 PCIe 5.0。由于 Arrow Lake NPU 性能较弱,这不是一款 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑,但支持网络摄像头的 Studio 特效和实时字幕。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 197.3, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 263, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
Networking | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
输入设备 - 一个非常好的键盘
输入设备也基本保持不变,只有右侧的 Ctrl 键被 Copilot 键取代。得益于 1.7 毫米的超长键程,G16 键盘仍能提供非常舒适的键入体验,这也是 G16 相对于 雷蛇刀锋 16不过,它只提供单区照明。大尺寸 ClickPad 质量上乘,运行完美。
显示屏 - 240 Hz OLED
华硕继续使用三星熟悉的 240 Hz OLED 面板,这就是为什么您最好从我们的 我们的 2024 评测.该显示器支持 G-Sync,非常适合游戏,但最大 HDR 亮度相对较低(Razer Blade 16 也是如此)。 雷蛇刀锋 16).华硕开箱即提供了 P3 和 sRGB 的准确色彩配置文件,并有一个软件解决方案用于调光,而无需进入可能存在问题的 PWM 范围。
性能 - 现配备 Arrow Lake 和最高 64GB 内存
华硕现在将新的 RTX 5000 笔记本电脑 GPU 与箭湖一代的英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 285H 结合在一起。内存继续采用焊接工艺,但最大内存容量从 32 GB 增至 64 GB(LPDDR5x-7467)。
测试条件
华硕为用户提供了三种熟悉的电源配置文件:安静"、"性能 "和 "涡轮增压",它们也与 Windows 设置相关联。我们使用 Turbo 配置文件进行了以下基准测试和测量。手动配置文件理论上会将 GPU 的 TGP 再增加 10 瓦,但在我们的测试中,GPU 性能实际上略有降低。
能源概况 | CPU 负载 | CB 2024 Multi | GPU 负载 | Time Spy 图形 | 赛博朋克 2077 QHD Ultra | 最大风扇容量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
静音 | 60/45 瓦 | 573 分 | 55 瓦 | 12,485 分 | 48.6fps | 42.4 dB(A) |
性能 | 95/70 瓦 | 1,135 分 | 105 瓦 | 77.7 分 | 77.7fps | 47.7 dB(A) |
涡轮 | 100/80 瓦 | 1,194 分 | 120 瓦 | 19,216 分 | 83.2fps | 53.3 dB(A) |
处理器 - Core Ultra 9 285H
每个英特尔变体中使用的处理器都是 酷睿至尊 9 285H处理器。在 G16 中,允许芯片短时间消耗 100 瓦,持续负载时消耗 80 瓦。在单核测试中,性能非常出色,但在多核测试中,80 瓦时,Blade 16 中的 Ryen AI 9 HX 370 略微快一些。与配备 Core Ultra 9 185H平均优势为 16%。在持续负载情况下,多核性能并没有完全保持稳定,但约为 9%,差距相当小。使用电池供电时,多核性能降低约 22%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY -2! | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F -2! |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (331 - 2223, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (740 - 1194, n=3) |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (127 - 128, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (68.2 - 138, n=61, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 39652, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (16632 - 22080, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (2126 - 2163, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2252, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 15517, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (6517 - 8251, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (810 - 827, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 866, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 6074, n=155, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (2797 - 3333, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (313 - 318, n=3) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (159 - 235, n=3) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average of class Gaming (81 - 555, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 144064, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (53335 - 69676, n=3) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (5999 - 6138, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (15330 - 17992, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 21668, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (2665 - 3110, n=5) | |
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3219, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (14243 - 16626, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 25855, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (1982 - 2108, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 42.9, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (18.8 - 25.9, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (42.8 - 52.1, n=3) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (0.427 - 0.4343, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 81639, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (15160 - 23492, n=3) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (78572 - 116017, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (3695 - 5206, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (61461 - 66818, n=3) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (7275 - 9089, n=3) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (40946 - 61884, n=3) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (58110 - 79949, n=3) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (886 - 1233, n=3) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 43430, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (7741 - 12887, n=3) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (58622 - 58848, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=148, last 2 years) |
系统性能
评测设备在合成基准测试中表现非常出色,我们的主观性能观察也证实了这一点。只有在通过高级优化程序激活专用显卡时(如启动游戏时),才会出现轻微的延迟,但这是正常现象。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=134, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=134, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=134, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=134, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=115, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=115, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=115, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=115, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=128, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 335, n=116, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average of class Gaming (409 - 674, n=140, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 8864 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (88278 - 97612, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=148, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (78309 - 80277, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 102937, n=148, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (62446 - 75619, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 108954, n=148, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (128.7 - 133.1, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=148, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
评测机配备了 WD 2 TB 固态硬盘,用户在首次启动后可使用 1.74 TB。PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘的性能非常出色,即使在连续负载的情况下也能保持稳定。得益于第二个 M.2 2280 插槽,存储容量可以非常方便、经济地扩展。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
华硕今年再次采用了 Nvidia 的顶级型号,即新的 GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU配备 24GB VRAM。TGP 的总功耗略有提高,达到 120 瓦(95 瓦 + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost),这显然不是最快的版本之一。在我们的合成基准测试中,与旧版本的 Zephyrus G16的优势为 14%。相比之下,在 160 瓦的情况下,Blade 16 中的 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU 刀锋 16快 19 在持续负载下,图形处理器的性能完全保持稳定,但在电池模式下,性能差距几乎达到 50%。
3DMark 11 Performance | 40400 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 35623 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 17820 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 4791 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 18624 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 18775 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Average of class Gaming (10 - 95, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (10 - 15, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (16 - 153, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average of class Gaming (123 - 962, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (125 - 259, n=4) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) |
* ... smaller is better
在我们的标准 1080p 游戏基准测试中,与大型游戏笔记本电脑相比,新款 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU 没有发挥出应有的潜能,而且在一定程度上被处理器拖慢了速度。不过,一旦切换到 QHD 分辨率,新的 G16 2025 的优势就会增加 20-25%,具体取决于游戏标题。我们在 GPU 分析中详细介绍了新的升频功能。这些功能只有在启用光线追踪时才有必要。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F -1! | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average of class Gaming |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 158, n=90, last 2 years) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 168.2, n=133, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=145, last 2 years) |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 420, n=140, last 2 years) |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (83.2 - 110.6, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average of class Gaming (24.8 - 110, n=73, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset DLSS4 quality no FG | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (94.1 - 125.5, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (94.1 - 115.6, n=4, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
GTA V - 2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (121.4 - 156.8, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (36.9 - 163.3, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 136.6 | 129.7 | ||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 170.5 | 154.4 | 151.3 | 141.9 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 218 | 184.5 | 154.4 | 123.4 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 122.9 | 111.8 | 91.4 | |||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 480 | 381 | 334 | 308 | 240 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 143.1 | 103.1 | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 164.2 | 146.4 | 124.5 | 112.3 | 94.1 | 83.2 |
Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 83 | 57.6 | ||||
F1 24 (2024) | 240 | 107.5 | 72.5 | |||
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 87.7 | 76.2 | 66.1 | |||
Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) | 66.4 | 63.9 | 54 | |||
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 44 | 45 | 37 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.8 / 27.2 / 31.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 47.6 / 53.3 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006 | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -0% | -8% | 7% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 23.8 | 24.1 -1% | 26 -9% | 23.4 2% | 24.6 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.8 | 24.1 -1% | 28 -18% | 23.8 -0% | 24.6 -3% |
Idle Average * | 27.2 | 30.6 -13% | 29 -7% | 28.5 -5% | 27.8 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.3 | 30.6 2% | 31 1% | 28.5 9% | 31.9 -2% |
Load Average * | 47.6 | 45.5 4% | 51 -7% | 28.8 39% | 49.2 -3% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 51.3 | 48.2 6% | 52.3 -2% | ||
Load Maximum * | 53.3 | 53.4 -0% | 56 -5% | 54.2 -2% | 52.3 2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 54 | 49.5 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.3 °C / -2.4 F).
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -15% | -11% | -27% | -4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44 | 48.3 -10% | 47 -7% | 51 -16% | 45.9 -4% |
Maximum Bottom * | 44.1 | 53.3 -21% | 56 -27% | 50.8 -15% | 47.5 -8% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.1 | 28.3 -8% | 27 -3% | 36.6 -40% | 26.1 -0% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.5 | 30.3 -19% | 27 -6% | 35.2 -38% | 26.6 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Zephyrus G16 的音响系统仍然是市场上最好的音响系统之一,这也是它与新的 刀锋 16.
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, SSSTC CA6-8D2048, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Alienware x16 R2 P120F Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | -28% | -31% | 10% | |
Idle Minimum * | 9.4 | 10.9 -16% | 6 36% | 9.9 -5% | 7.8 17% |
Idle Average * | 13.6 | 13.5 1% | 16 -18% | 14.5 -7% | 10.9 20% |
Idle Maximum * | 15.8 | 13.7 13% | 28 -77% | 33.5 -112% | 11.6 27% |
Load Average * | 115.4 | 120.2 -4% | 130 -13% | 97.5 16% | 98.7 14% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 164.5 | 178.2 -8% | 157.3 4% | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 160.4 | 177.6 -11% | 165.5 -3% | ||
Load Maximum * | 216.7 | 246.1 -14% | 361 -67% | 315.2 -45% | 232 -7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 302 | 230 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
- 04/04/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $99.99 240W Rectangle Conn Charger ... 2. $1,869.00 ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 Gaming... 3. $96.99 240W Charger for Asus ROG Ze... List Price: 4799€ | 1.9 kg | 17.4 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $4,499.99 Razer Blade 18 Gaming Laptop... 2. $4,999.00 Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop... 3. $5,698.00 Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop... List Price: 4399€ | 2.1 kg | 17.4 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $143.00 16.0" for Schenker XMG Neo 1... 2. $150.00 16.0" Screen Replacement for... 3. $155.00 Replacement Screen 16.0" for... List Price: 3800 Euro | 2.5 kg | 26.6 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $3,001.87 List Price: 3200 USD | 2.7 kg | 18.57 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 4300€ | 1.9 kg | 16.4 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.