Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

配备 RTX 5090 和 64 GB 内存的超薄游戏笔记本电脑 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 评测

Arrow Lake 和 240 Hz OLED。

华硕更新了其超薄型 ROG Zephyrus G16 游戏笔记本电脑。对于 2025 机型,顶级版本将配备箭湖处理器和新的GeForce RTX 5090。内存仍为焊接式,但最大内存容量增加了一倍,达到 64 GB。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Arrow Lake Blackwell RTX 5000 Gaming Geforce Thunderbolt Wi-Fi 7 Windows

评语 - ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 仍是一款非常适合移动的游戏机

ROG Zephyrus G16 的 2025 更新提供了多项升级。由于采用了箭湖处理器和全新的GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU,其整体性能也有所提升。不过,我们仍然有必要知道,它使用的是相对较慢的 GPU 版本。其他改进还包括 Wi-Fi 7、64 GB 内存和更长的电池续航时间。输入设备和扬声器依然非常出色。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

薄弱环节仍然是显示屏盖(在我们的评测机型上产生的嘎吱声微乎其微)和铰链,它们无法防止明显的摇晃。我们希望 2025 型号能在这方面有所改进。华硕还应该重新考虑空闲运行时风扇发出的轻微脉动噪音。OLED 面板仍然是游戏的最佳选择,但最大 HDR 亮度仍然很低。

我们的高端评测机型售价为 4600 美元,非常昂贵,甚至超过了 雷蛇刀锋 16的主要竞争对手。我们将在另一篇文章中详细比较这两款设备,但总体而言,ROG Zephyrus G16 更像是一款高端多媒体或全能设备。而 Blade 16 则专注于在紧凑的机身中提供尽可能高的游戏性能,两款设备各有优缺点。

Pros

+ 非常优质和紧凑的铝材
+ 梦幻般的 240 Hz G-Sync OLED 显示屏
+ 出色的游戏性能
+ 出色的扬声器
+ 出色的输入设备
+ 2 个固态硬盘插槽
+ 良好的系统性能
+ 现在最高可配备 64GB 内存和 Wi-Fi 7

Cons

- RTX 5090 笔记本电脑无法发挥其潜力
- 焊接内存
- 有限的最大 HDR 亮度
- PWM 闪烁

价格和可用性

在我们进行评测时,新款 ROG Zephyrus G16 还未在亚马逊或百思买等在线商店上架。

2025 年,华硕更新了其 ROG Zephyrus G16 游戏笔记本,配备了 Nvidia 最新的 RTX 5000 笔记本 GPU。目前仍有两款基本型号:一款配备 AMD 处理器和传统散热装置,笔记本 GPU 最高可达 RTX 5070。在此基础上,还有配备英特尔 CPU 和蒸气室冷却系统的型号,其最高配置为GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU,TGP 为 120 瓦。

规格

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H 16 x 4.5 - 5.4 GHz, 100 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-H
Graphics adapter
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop - 24 GB VRAM, Core: 2040 MHz, RAM: 1763 MHz, 120 W TDP, GDDR6, 572.83, Advanced Optimus
Memory
64 GB 
, LPDDR5x-7467, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Arrow Lake-H PCH
Storage
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006, 2048 GB 
, 1822 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Arrow Lake-U/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC
Networking
Intel BE201 320MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.4 x 354 x 246
Battery
90 Wh, 5820 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1080p + IR
Additional features
Speakers: 4 speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 240W PSU, Armoury Crate, 3-month Xbox Game Pass, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.878 kg, Power Supply: 758 g
Price
4799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

与 ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 的区别

华硕在 2025 年的机型中保留了不变的深灰色金属机身,这也是 ROG Zephyrus G16 继续成为一款纤薄、尤其是相对轻巧的 16 英寸游戏笔记本电脑的原因所在。 雷蛇刀锋 16 2025它同样轻薄,但却重了约 200 克。

机箱质量和稳定性都很出色,但盖子仍然是一个弱点,存在可听到的最小吱吱声。即使是铰链也无法避免明显的晃动。机箱内部,蒸发室的布局只做了极小的改动,但维护选项并没有改变。提供两个 M.2 2280 插槽,必要时可更换 Wi-Fi 模块和电池。

Wi-Fi 模块(英特尔 BE201)现在支持 Wi-Fi 7 标准,传输速度不错,但缺少 Thunderbolt 5 或 PCIe 5.0。由于 Arrow Lake NPU 性能较弱,这不是一款 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑,但支持网络摄像头的 Studio 特效和实时字幕。

尺寸比较

364.74 mm 289.81 mm 18.57 mm 2.7 kg356.7 mm 253 mm 26.6 mm 2.5 kg355 mm 250.5 mm 17.4 mm 2.1 kg354 mm 246 mm 17.4 mm 1.9 kg354 mm 246 mm 16.4 mm 1.9 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
182 MB/s
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
168.9 MB/s -7%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
133 MB/s -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 197.3, n=68, last 2 years)
89.1 MB/s -51%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
78.7 MB/s -57%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
76 MB/s -58%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
258 MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
216.5 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
193.2 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 263, n=67, last 2 years)
112.3 MB/s -48%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
89.9 MB/s -58%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
87 MB/s -60%
Networking
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel BE201 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1660 (min: 1542) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1587 (min: 1550) MBit/s ∼93%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1781 (min: 1669) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1708 (min: 1681) MBit/s ∼100%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1018 (min: 656) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1689 (min: 843) MBit/s ∼99%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1393 (min: 771) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1298 (min: 794) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1216 (min: 706) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1281 (min: 925) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1650 (min: 1594) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1696 (min: 1662) MBit/s ∼99%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1660 (1542-1822)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1587 (1550-1603)

输入设备 - 一个非常好的键盘

输入设备也基本保持不变,只有右侧的 Ctrl 键被 Copilot 键取代。得益于 1.7 毫米的超长键程,G16 键盘仍能提供非常舒适的键入体验,这也是 G16 相对于 雷蛇刀锋 16不过,它只提供单区照明。大尺寸 ClickPad 质量上乘,运行完美。

键盘上现在有一个 Copilot 键
键盘上现在有一个 Copilot 键

显示屏 - 240 Hz OLED

华硕继续使用三星熟悉的 240 Hz OLED 面板,这就是为什么您最好从我们的 我们的 2024 评测.该显示器支持 G-Sync,非常适合游戏,但最大 HDR 亮度相对较低(Razer Blade 16 也是如此)。 雷蛇刀锋 16).华硕开箱即提供了 P3 和 sRGB 的准确色彩配置文件,并有一个软件解决方案用于调光,而无需进入可能存在问题的 PWM 范围。

性能 - 现配备 Arrow Lake 和最高 64GB 内存

华硕现在将新的 RTX 5000 笔记本电脑 GPU 与箭湖一代的英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 285H 结合在一起。内存继续采用焊接工艺,但最大内存容量从 32 GB 增至 64 GB(LPDDR5x-7467)。

 
 
 

测试条件

华硕为用户提供了三种熟悉的电源配置文件:安静"、"性能 "和 "涡轮增压",它们也与 Windows 设置相关联。我们使用 Turbo 配置文件进行了以下基准测试和测量。手动配置文件理论上会将 GPU 的 TGP 再增加 10 瓦,但在我们的测试中,GPU 性能实际上略有降低。

能源概况 CPU 负载 CB 2024 Multi GPU 负载 Time Spy 图形 赛博朋克 2077 QHD Ultra 最大风扇容量
静音 60/45 瓦 573 分 55 瓦 12,485 分 48.6fps 42.4 dB(A)
性能 95/70 瓦 1,135 分 105 瓦 77.7 分 77.7fps 47.7 dB(A)
涡轮 100/80 瓦 1,194 分 120 瓦 19,216 分 83.2fps 53.3 dB(A)

处理器 - Core Ultra 9 285H

每个英特尔变体中使用的处理器都是 酷睿至尊 9 285H处理器。在 G16 中,允许芯片短时间消耗 100 瓦,持续负载时消耗 80 瓦。在单核测试中,性能非常出色,但在多核测试中,80 瓦时,Blade 16 中的 Ryen AI 9 HX 370 略微快一些。与配备 Core Ultra 9 185H平均优势为 16%。在持续负载情况下,多核性能并没有完全保持稳定,但约为 9%,差距相当小。使用电池供电时,多核性能降低约 22%。

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

02655307951060132515901855212023852650291531803445371039754240450547705035Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H: Ø3112 (3034.67-3332.5)
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3489 (3470.41-3505.08)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø5001 (4861.45-5267.14)
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2753 (2708.56-2857.35)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2756 (2704.71-3019.32)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
89.3 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
69.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
68.5 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
 
64.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
62.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY -2!
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
59.1 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F -2!
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
51.8 pt
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
1940 Points +62%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
1284 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (331 - 2223, n=60, last 2 years)
1255 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
1194 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (740 - 1194, n=3)
975 Points -18%
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
131.7 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
128 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (127 - 128, n=3)
127.3 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
118 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (68.2 - 138, n=61, last 2 years)
115.7 Points -10%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
36249 Points +64%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
23805 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
22080 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 39652, n=151, last 2 years)
21232 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (16632 - 22080, n=3)
19718 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
19110 Points -13%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18338 (17139.2min - 18337.8max) Points -17%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2209 Points +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (2126 - 2163, n=3)
2141 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2133 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2039 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2252, n=151, last 2 years)
1879 Points -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1876 Points -12%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1620 Points -24%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
13824 Points +68%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
9250 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
8251 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 15517, n=151, last 2 years)
8130 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (6517 - 8251, n=3)
7563 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7299 Points -12%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7081 Points -14%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
844 Points +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (810 - 827, n=3)
818 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
817 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
800 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 866, n=151, last 2 years)
723 Points -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
718 Points -12%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
622 Points -24%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
5267 Points +58%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
3505 (3470.41min - 3505.08max) Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
3333 (3034.67min - 3332.5max) Points
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 6074, n=155, last 2 years)
3294 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (2797 - 3333, n=3)
3137 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3019 (2704.71min - 3019.32max) Points -9%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2857 (2708.56min - 2857.35max) Points -14%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
318 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (313 - 318, n=3)
315 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
310 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
310 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 343, n=152, last 2 years)
277 Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
275 Points -14%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
238 Points -25%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (159 - 235, n=3)
197 Seconds * -24%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
178 Seconds * -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
177 Seconds * -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (81 - 555, n=145, last 2 years)
176.3 Seconds * -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
159 Seconds *
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
140 Seconds * +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
95 Seconds * +40%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
135229 MIPS +94%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
83714 MIPS +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 144064, n=150, last 2 years)
82437 MIPS +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
72583 MIPS +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
69676 MIPS
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
67227 MIPS -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (53335 - 69676, n=3)
61217 MIPS -12%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7406 MIPS +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=150, last 2 years)
6256 MIPS +2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
6252 MIPS +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
6136 MIPS
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (5999 - 6138, n=3)
6091 MIPS -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
5651 MIPS -8%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
4502 MIPS -27%
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19451 Points +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
17207 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (15330 - 17992, n=5)
16653 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
15671 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14540 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 21668, n=119, last 2 years)
14270 Points -17%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
12825 Points -25%
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3129 Points +7%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2942 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2923 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (2665 - 3110, n=5)
2878 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3219, n=119, last 2 years)
2661 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2559 Points -12%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2199 Points -25%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
23086 Points +46%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
15818 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (14243 - 16626, n=3)
15562 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
15407 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 25855, n=149, last 2 years)
14591 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14137 Points -11%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
12759 Points -19%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2195 Points +4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2136 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2108 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (1982 - 2108, n=3)
2062 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2423, n=149, last 2 years)
1895 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1846 Points -12%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1700 Points -19%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
35.3 fps +36%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
28.7 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
25.9 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 42.9, n=149, last 2 years)
23.1 fps -11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (18.8 - 25.9, n=3)
22.8 fps -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
21.3 fps -18%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
20.7 fps -20%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 96.6, n=148, last 2 years)
47.5 s * -11%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
46.8 s * -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (42.8 - 52.1, n=3)
46.3 s * -8%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
45.9 s * -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
42.9 s * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
42.8 s *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
32.9 s * +23%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.503 sec * -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=151, last 2 years)
0.4406 sec * -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.4313 sec * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
0.4312 sec *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (0.427 - 0.4343, n=3)
0.4308 sec * -0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
0.3979 sec * +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3658 sec * +15%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3333 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
219 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
318 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
8251 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
817 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2133 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
22080 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
128 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1194 Points
Help
Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
94.3 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
84.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
67.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
65.4 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
61.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
58.8 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
 
56.8 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
37324 KRay/s +59%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
30829 KRay/s +31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
23492 KRay/s
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 81639, n=148, last 2 years)
22619 KRay/s -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (15160 - 23492, n=3)
19150 KRay/s -18%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
18676 KRay/s -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
17461 KRay/s -26%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
150728 Points +30%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
142039 Points +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
116017 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=148, last 2 years)
107612 Points -7%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
96463 Points -17%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (78572 - 116017, n=3)
95904 Points -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
90983 Points -22%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
7588 MB/s +46%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
5824 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
5206 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=148, last 2 years)
4877 MB/s -6%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
4534 MB/s -13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (3695 - 5206, n=3)
4394 MB/s -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
4278 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
148966 Points +130%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=148, last 2 years)
115068 Points +78%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
94794 Points +46%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
91400 Points +41%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
88891 Points +37%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
64720 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (61461 - 66818, n=3)
64333 Points -1%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
19115 Points +110%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
18114 Points +99%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=148, last 2 years)
13337 Points +47%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
11095 Points +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
11092 Points +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
9089 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (7275 - 9089, n=3)
8072 Points -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76668 Points +24%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
75107 Points +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
61884 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=148, last 2 years)
54508 Points -12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (40946 - 61884, n=3)
50545 Points -18%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
48020 Points -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
45127 Points -27%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
145389 MB/s +82%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=148, last 2 years)
104976 MB/s +31%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
88763 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84774 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
82547 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
79949 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (58110 - 79949, n=3)
68653 MB/s -14%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2239 MB/s +82%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
1514 MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2531, n=148, last 2 years)
1336 MB/s +8%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1298 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
1233 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1201 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (886 - 1233, n=3)
1044 MB/s -15%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
20284 KRay/s +57%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16655 KRay/s +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
12887 KRay/s
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 43430, n=148, last 2 years)
12143 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (7741 - 12887, n=3)
10183 KRay/s -21%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
10078 KRay/s -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
9329 KRay/s -28%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (58622 - 58848, n=3)
58771 MPixel/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
58622 MPixel/s
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
53242 MPixel/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
52181 MPixel/s -11%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
51417 MPixel/s -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
49305 MPixel/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=148, last 2 years)
39873 MPixel/s -32%

系统性能

评测设备在合成基准测试中表现非常出色,我们的主观性能观察也证实了这一点。只有在通过高级优化程序激活专用显卡时(如启动游戏时),才会出现轻微的延迟,但这是正常现象。

PCMark 10 / Score
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9017 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
8864 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
8864 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
8254 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
7993 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=134, last 2 years)
7837 Points -12%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7251 Points -18%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11065 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
10835 Points +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12600, n=134, last 2 years)
10742 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
10717 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
10717 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
10626 Points -1%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10036 Points -6%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11681 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
11309 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
11309 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
10341 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
9937 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=134, last 2 years)
9903 Points -12%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7934 Points -30%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
15593 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
15593 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
15394 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
13889 Points -11%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
12994 Points -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
12872 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (6807 - 18475, n=134, last 2 years)
12414 Points -20%
CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2344 Points +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
2064 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
2064 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=115, last 2 years)
1896 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1815 Points -12%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1589 Points -23%
CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2162 Points +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1918 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
1918 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=115, last 2 years)
1798 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1700 Points -11%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1584 Points -17%
CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2660 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
2416 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
2416 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=115, last 2 years)
2079 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2070 Points -14%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1583 Points -34%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2045 Points +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=115, last 2 years)
1696 Points +6%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1621 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1604 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
1604 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1490 Points -7%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
336 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
333 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
333 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
321 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=128, last 2 years)
302 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
281 Points -16%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
237 Points -29%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
311 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
311 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
306 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
269 Points -14%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
268 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.4 - 335, n=116, last 2 years)
265 Points -15%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
237 Points -24%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
594 ms * -32%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
522 ms * -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (409 - 674, n=140, last 2 years)
504 ms * -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
450 ms *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (n=1)
450 ms * -0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
429 ms * +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
428 ms * +5%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
8864 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
97515 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (88278 - 97612, n=3)
94468 MB/s -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93766 MB/s -4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
93640 MB/s -4%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
89701 MB/s -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78897 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (21750 - 97515, n=148, last 2 years)
65873 MB/s -32%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
102937 MB/s +31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86939 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86010 MB/s +10%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
85092 MB/s +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (78309 - 80277, n=3)
79439 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
78309 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (22956 - 102937, n=148, last 2 years)
69068 MB/s -12%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
103860 MB/s +38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77562 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
75937 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
75293 MB/s
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
73199 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (62446 - 75619, n=3)
71119 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (22297 - 108954, n=148, last 2 years)
68215 MB/s -9%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
142.3 ns * -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
137.9 ns * -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  (128.7 - 133.1, n=3)
130.8 ns * -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
128.7 ns *
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
103.6 ns * +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=148, last 2 years)
96.2 ns * +25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76.1 ns * +41%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试(网页浏览、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,采用当前 BIOS 版本的评测设备在使用实时音频应用程序时表现出了局限性。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
16146 μs * -401%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
3220.2 μs *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2536.9 μs * +21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2478.6 μs * +23%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
492.6 μs * +85%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

评测机配备了 WD 2 TB 固态硬盘,用户在首次启动后可使用 1.74 TB。PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘的性能非常出色,即使在连续负载的情况下也能保持稳定。得益于第二个 M.2 2280 插槽,存储容量可以非常方便、经济地扩展。

Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6269 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5020 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 677 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 459 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 80.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 158.5 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 414 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1191 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
91.5 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
79.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
76.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
69.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
65.3 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
63 pt
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
 
57.9 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4224 (3741.6min - 4224.02max) MB/s +163%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
3790 (2816.71min - 3789.94max) MB/s +136%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3541 (3501.11min - 3540.88max) MB/s +120%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=131, last 2 years)
3430 MB/s +113%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3015 (2943.98min - 3014.55max) MB/s +88%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (1607 - 3055, n=2)
2331 MB/s +45%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1607 (236.92min - 1606.84max) MB/s
seq write
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4899 (4625.25min - 4898.53max) MB/s +29%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4826 (4760.33min - 4825.54max) MB/s +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=131, last 2 years)
3831 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
3794 (3585.08min - 3793.54max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
3362 (2028.5min - 3361.51max) MB/s -11%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (2594 - 3794, n=2)
3194 MB/s -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3160 (3033.95min - 3160.41max) MB/s -17%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7140 (5903.9min - 7139.54max) MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
7106 (6065.83min - 7105.62max) MB/s +13%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
6823 (5715.47min - 6822.87max) MB/s +9%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
6780 (5762.77min - 6780.16max) MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
6278 (5683.91min - 6278.45max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=131, last 2 years)
6231 MB/s -1%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (5979 - 6278, n=2)
6129 MB/s -2%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6860 (6824.33min - 6859.91max) MB/s +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
5861 (4855.26min - 5860.72max) MB/s
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (4977 - 5861, n=2)
5419 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
5248 (5141.58min - 5248.1max) MB/s -10%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5208 (5161.3min - 5208.07max) MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=131, last 2 years)
4847 MB/s -17%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
4844 (4270.43min - 4843.96max) MB/s -17%
4k q1 t1 read
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
79.3 (64.25min - 79.25max) MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
78.7 (77.61min - 78.69max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
69.9 (69.26min - 69.89max) MB/s -11%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (60.3 - 78.7, n=2)
69.5 MB/s -12%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
69.2 (68.61min - 69.17max) MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.6 - 95.9, n=131, last 2 years)
66 MB/s -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
60.5 (49.54min - 60.46max) MB/s -23%
4k q1 t1 write
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
265 (258.55min - 264.55max) MB/s +60%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
244 (238.59min - 244.13max) MB/s +48%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=131, last 2 years)
223 MB/s +35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
174.4 (160.08min - 174.38max) MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
165.3 (162.66min - 165.27max) MB/s
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (135.2 - 165.3, n=2)
150.3 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
130.3 (127.94min - 130.31max) MB/s -21%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4920 (4883.21min - 4920.02max) MB/s +480%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4245 (4210.56min - 4245.12max) MB/s +401%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
3189 (3182.48min - 3189.1max) MB/s +276%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=131, last 2 years)
2603 MB/s +207%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (848 - 927, n=2)
888 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
848 (703.36min - 848.14max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
597 (590.16min - 596.69max) MB/s -30%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4522 (4451.05min - 4521.93max) MB/s +892%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2907 (2737.8min - 2907.05max) MB/s +538%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
2210 (729.15min - 2210.24max) MB/s +385%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=131, last 2 years)
2129 MB/s +367%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (456 - 469, n=2)
463 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
456 (68.45min - 456.36max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
393 (388.68min - 393.4max) MB/s -14%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9365 Points +89%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
8139 Points +65%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
7379 Points +49%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=125, last 2 years)
6755 Points +37%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
5595 Points +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
4945 Points
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (4432 - 4945, n=2)
4689 Points -5%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3496 Points +123%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
3215 Points +105%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3204 Points +104%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=125, last 2 years)
2439 Points +55%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1569 Points
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (1358 - 1569, n=2)
1464 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1402 Points -11%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4062 Points +54%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3588 Points +36%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3341 Points +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=125, last 2 years)
3131 Points +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
2635 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
2571 Points -2%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (2441 - 2635, n=2)
2538 Points -4%
Seq Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5684.15 MB/s +16%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5642.41 MB/s +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
5351 MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
5081 MB/s +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=125, last 2 years)
4913 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
4884 MB/s
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (4880 - 4884, n=2)
4882 MB/s 0%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5612.29 MB/s +71%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4787.7 MB/s +46%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
4160 MB/s +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=125, last 2 years)
3823 MB/s +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
3282 MB/s
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (3259 - 3282, n=2)
3271 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2713 MB/s -17%
4K Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
72.9 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
72.1 MB/s
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
70.48 MB/s -2%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (68 - 72.1, n=2)
70.1 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=125, last 2 years)
65.1 MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
64.4 MB/s -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
59.28 MB/s -18%
4K Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
248.48 MB/s +15%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
230 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
217 MB/s
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
213.62 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.4 - 512, n=125, last 2 years)
213 MB/s -2%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (159.6 - 217, n=2)
188.3 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
180.5 MB/s -17%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2933.61 MB/s +191%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
2642 MB/s +162%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2569.34 MB/s +155%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=125, last 2 years)
1875 MB/s +86%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1009 MB/s
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (802 - 1009, n=2)
906 MB/s -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
794 MB/s -21%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3252.43 MB/s +56%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3136 MB/s +50%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2648.4 MB/s +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=125, last 2 years)
2540 MB/s +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
2090 MB/s
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (1956 - 2090, n=2)
2023 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
1926 MB/s -8%
Access Time Read
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.09 ms * -157%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (0.035 - 0.111, n=2)
0.073 ms * -109%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=124, last 2 years)
0.05657 ms * -62%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
0.051 ms * -46%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
0.035 ms *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
0.024 ms * +31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.024 ms * +31%
Access Time Write
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.055 ms * -189%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=125, last 2 years)
0.05115 ms * -169%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
0.023 ms * -21%
Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
  (0.019 - 0.026, n=2)
0.0225 ms * -18%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
0.021 ms * -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
0.019 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.016 ms * +16%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

03206409601280160019202240256028803200352038404160448048005120544057606080Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6269 (5613.96-6306.73)

图形卡

华硕今年再次采用了 Nvidia 的顶级型号,即新的 GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU配备 24GB VRAM。TGP 的总功耗略有提高,达到 120 瓦(95 瓦 + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost),这显然不是最快的版本之一。在我们的合成基准测试中,与旧版本的 Zephyrus G16的优势为 14%。相比之下,在 160 瓦的情况下,Blade 16 中的 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU 刀锋 16快 19 在持续负载下,图形处理器的性能完全保持稳定,但在电池模式下,性能差距几乎达到 50%。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
99.2 pt
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
 
94.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
92.3 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
83.5 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
74.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
73 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
55.4 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
70760 Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
69606 Points +29%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (54052 - 70760, n=4)
65445 Points +21%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
56772 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
54073 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
54052 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (10741 - 72178, n=144, last 2 years)
42936 Points -21%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
52065 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
51946 Points +22%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (42516 - 60880, n=4)
51081 Points +20%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
42558 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
42516 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
40259 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2913 - 56116, n=156, last 2 years)
30943 Points -27%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (19216 - 25129, n=4)
22757 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
22134 Points +15%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
22082 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
19216 Points
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18627 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
16950 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2295 - 24599, n=151, last 2 years)
12873 Points -33%
Steel Nomad Score
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
5652 Points +18%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (4791 - 6156, n=3)
5533 Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
5102 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
4791 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3915 Points -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (1522 - 5652, n=27, last 2 years)
3210 Points -33%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
15433 Points +21%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (12749 - 17063, n=3)
15082 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
14107 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
12749 Points
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
11574 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (984 - 15433, n=83, last 2 years)
8655 Points -32%
Geekbench 6.4
GPU OpenCL
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (181670 - 234213, n=4)
205533 Points +13%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
199973 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
190820 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
181670 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
161798 Points -11%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
153327 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (4321 - 234213, n=118, last 2 years)
118835 Points -35%
GPU Vulkan
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
215511 Points +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
185851 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
164105 Points -12%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (7393 - 231659, n=4)
160104 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
132767 Points -29%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
115199 Points -38%
Average of class Gaming
  (4286 - 231659, n=110, last 2 years)
86659 Points -53%
3DMark 11 Performance
40400 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
35623 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
17820 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
4791 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
18624 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
18775 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 95, n=144, last 2 years)
21.2 Seconds * -77%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
15 Seconds * -25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13 Seconds * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13 Seconds * -8%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
13 Seconds * -8%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (10 - 15, n=5)
12.2 Seconds * -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
12 Seconds *
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (16 - 153, n=4)
51.5 Seconds * -186%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=146, last 2 years)
37.9 Seconds * -111%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
22 Seconds * -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
20 Seconds * -11%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
19 Seconds * -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
18 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
17 Seconds * +6%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
305 Seconds * -18%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
305 Seconds * -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (123 - 962, n=151, last 2 years)
301 Seconds * -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
259 Seconds *
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
210 Seconds * +19%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (125 - 259, n=4)
182.8 Seconds * +29%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
167 Seconds * +36%

* ... smaller is better

在我们的标准 1080p 游戏基准测试中,与大型游戏笔记本电脑相比,新款 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU 没有发挥出应有的潜能,而且在一定程度上被处理器拖慢了速度。不过,一旦切换到 QHD 分辨率,新的 G16 2025 的优势就会增加 20-25%,具体取决于游戏标题。我们在 GPU 分析中详细介绍了新的升频功能。这些功能只有在启用光线追踪时才有必要。

Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
100 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
77 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
75.2 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F -1!
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
72.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
68 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
65.7 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
131.5 (62.2min) fps +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
112.3 (87.5min) fps
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
105.3 (74.7min) fps -6%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
99.7 (13.5min) fps -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93.1 (64.5min) fps -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 158, n=90, last 2 years)
88.7 fps -21%
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
187 fps +31%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
162 fps +13%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
159.4 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
143.1 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
118 fps -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (34.5 - 208, n=57, last 2 years)
112.4 fps -21%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
159.3 (3.25min, 125P1) fps +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
136.6 (3.95min, 90.9P1) fps
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
121.6 (8.28min, 83.3P1) fps -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 168.2, n=133, last 2 years)
111.8 fps -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
107.1 (3.03min, 66.7P1) fps -22%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
196.9 fps +28%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
154.4 fps
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
147.4 fps -5%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
139.8 fps -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138 fps -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=145, last 2 years)
116.7 fps -24%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
403 (101.2min, 295P1) fps +31%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
319 (126.4min, 227P1) fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
308 (45.6min, 231P1) fps
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
293 (38.3min, 184.1P1) fps -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
288 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 420, n=140, last 2 years)
222 fps -28%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
194.6 (165.7min) fps +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=149, last 2 years)
147.9 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
141.9 (124.2min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138.7 (119.5min) fps -2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
137.1 (113.2min) fps -3%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
133 (114.6min) fps -6%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
144.5 fps +58%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=152, last 2 years)
103.3 fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
91.4 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
90 fps -2%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
89.3 fps -2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
85.2 fps -7%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (83.2 - 110.6, n=5)
101.8 fps +22%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
98.6 (74.5min) fps +19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93.8 (53.7min) fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
83.2 (70.1min) fps
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
75.4 (25.4min) fps -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
68.1 (55.3min) fps -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.8 - 110, n=73, last 2 years)
66.3 fps -20%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset DLSS4 quality no FG
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (94.1 - 125.5, n=4)
112.4 fps +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (94.1 - 115.6, n=4, last 2 years)
106.1 fps +13%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
104.6 (74.9min) fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
94.1 (81.4min) fps
Baldur's Gate 3 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
138.8 fps +35%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (103.1 - 150.5, n=4)
134.5 fps +30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
133.2 fps +29%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
124.3 fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
103.1 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
99 fps -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 155.2, n=43, last 2 years)
90.3 fps -12%
F1 24 - 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
94.9 (50min, 66P1) fps +31%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (72.5 - 105.5, n=4)
93.2 fps +29%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84.7 (69min, 68P1) fps +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
72.5 (57min, 57P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (36.7 - 100, n=16, last 2 years)
66.6 fps -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
58.5 (49min, 47P1) fps -19%
GTA V - 2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
156 (4.52min, 111.1P1) fps +20%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (121.4 - 156.8, n=3)
136 fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
129.7 (4.81min, 83.3P1) fps
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
121.4 (6.17min, 83.3P1) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (36.9 - 163.3, n=83, last 2 years)
105.9 fps -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
103.4 (2.58min, 58.8P1) fps -20%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø110 (100.1-112)
赛博朋克 2077 1080p 超 CPU/GPU 数据
赛博朋克 2077 1080p 超 CPU/GPU 数据
lowmed.highultraQHD DLSSQHD
GTA V (2015) 136.6 129.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 170.5 154.4 151.3 141.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 218 184.5 154.4 123.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 122.9 111.8 91.4
Strange Brigade (2018) 480 381 334 308 240
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 143.1 103.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 164.2 146.4 124.5 112.3 94.1 83.2
Alan Wake 2 (2023) 83 57.6
F1 24 (2024) 240 107.5 72.5
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) 87.7 76.2 66.1
Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) 66.4 63.9 54
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) 44 45 37

排放与能源

噪音排放

两个风扇与大型蒸发腔
两个风扇与大型蒸发腔

在 "性能 "和 "涡轮 "电源配置文件中,两个风扇都持续运转,转速略有波动,这有点令人讨厌,当然应该通过 BIOS 更新来解决。在负载情况下,数值与去年大致相当。因此,我们建议在玩游戏时使用耳机(Performance 和 Turbo 耳机),否则 ~48 和 ~51 dB(A) 的声音会太大。我们的评测设备没有发出其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle
23.8 / 27.2 / 31.3 dB(A)
Load
47.6 / 53.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.341.637.138.443.236.545.42531.830.229.829.229.429.133.13127.128.227.624.728.43035.74030.129.527.629.424.829.535.85027.126.426.924.324.425.330.66325.927.724.922.924.524.534.68028.524.423.421.421.823.431.510026.72423.620.419.720.42912528.625.925.22021.118.529.816028.125.62420.222.116.429.520028.52725.320.321.71831.4250292927.320.921.517.632.531535.528.927.621.222.715.735.740033.930.528.821.623.51235.450035.831.429.822.224.411.535.963034.831.929.217.821.310.637.180038.235.53321.424.410.639.4100040.136.634.12225.410.641.8125041.538.135.421.825.310.343.4160042.438.635.322.726.110.444.2200042.839.236.220.925.210.744.8250041.938.235.11922.811.143.9315039.63530.516.219.511.541.1400036.332.528.613.917.311.839.3500035.731.827.913.114.611.937.9630036.531.626.51313.912.238.8800032.427.223.712.713.412.235.81000026.622.420.112.713.112.330.11250024.6232212.712.912.327.31600019.92221.912.212.311.821.7SPL51.347.644.531.334.623.853.3N7.55.64.41.41.90.58.6median 35.5median 31.4median 27.9median 20.2median 21.5median 11.9median 35.9Delta5.654.33.84.42.45.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
Noise
-0%
-8%
7%
-2%
off / environment *
23.8
24.1
-1%
26
-9%
23.4
2%
24.6
-3%
Idle Minimum *
23.8
24.1
-1%
28
-18%
23.8
-0%
24.6
-3%
Idle Average *
27.2
30.6
-13%
29
-7%
28.5
-5%
27.8
-2%
Idle Maximum *
31.3
30.6
2%
31
1%
28.5
9%
31.9
-2%
Load Average *
47.6
45.5
4%
51
-7%
28.8
39%
49.2
-3%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
51.3
48.2
6%
52.3
-2%
Load Maximum *
53.3
53.4
-0%
56
-5%
54.2
-2%
52.3
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54
49.5

* ... smaller is better

温度

华硕超薄游戏笔记本的温度控制得很好。在空闲和轻负载运行时,金属表面几乎不发热,即使在游戏或压力测试中,温度也不受影响。最高 45-46°C 的温度当然很明显,但 G16 在这方面的表现明显优于 Blade 16 等产品。关键的 WASD 区域仍然保持着舒适的温度。在压力测试中,CPU 和 GPU 分别达到 35 瓦和 100 瓦。

CPU/GPU 压力测试数据
CPU/GPU 压力测试数据
Max. Load
 40.6 °C44 °C42.6 °C 
 34.4 °C38.2 °C35 °C 
 30.2 °C30.2 °C29.8 °C 
Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 36.1 °C
43.4 °C44.1 °C43.1 °C
33.4 °C41.2 °C37.4 °C
27.5 °C29.8 °C28.9 °C
Maximum: 44.1 °C
Average: 36.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  44.6 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.3 °C / -2.4 F).
应力测试表面温度(顶部)
应力测试表面温度(顶部)
应力测试表面温度(底部)
应力测试表面温度(底部)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Heat
-15%
-11%
-27%
-4%
Maximum Upper Side *
44
48.3
-10%
47
-7%
51
-16%
45.9
-4%
Maximum Bottom *
44.1
53.3
-21%
56
-27%
50.8
-15%
47.5
-8%
Idle Upper Side *
26.1
28.3
-8%
27
-3%
36.6
-40%
26.1
-0%
Idle Bottom *
25.5
30.3
-19%
27
-6%
35.2
-38%
26.6
-4%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

Zephyrus G16 的音响系统仍然是市场上最好的音响系统之一,这也是它与新的 刀锋 16.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.541.72529.136.7313036.44029.537.95025.339.56324.542.88023.449.110020.461.612518.566.416016.464.82001869.525017.670.631515.771.64001272.850011.572.463010.67580010.677.1100010.673.3125010.374.2160010.473.3200010.773250011.170.6315011.569.9400011.870.6500011.968630012.267.9800012.266.11000012.361.21250012.360.11600011.859.5SPL23.884N0.564.8median 11.9median 70.6Delta2.43.344.243.530.234.23232.228.233.424.832.424.237.222.238.819.244.518.549.21849.917.357.518.259.815.966.312.770.311.772.310.977.210.376.510.569.810.767.810.668.81169.311.370.811.967.912.269.112.162.712.559.112.560.612.760.512.855.411.955.324.182.10.553.7median 12.2median 66.32.16.338.136.532.836.844.146.527.830.520.533.626.43217.438.721.549.818.447.619.255.422.260.819.163.217.561.71664.515.570.913.475.21275.113.275.612.875.91475.613.373.212.873.113.174.713.273.21377.813.574.913.972.714.465.31360.612.555.525.986.40.871.1median 13.5median 72.727.137.831.737.838.824.638.841.621.341.641.718.741.744.720.444.745.119.245.152.820.152.859.717.359.764.414.164.472.614.472.676.213.876.281.514.581.582.414.182.480.813.680.879.911.779.981.411.481.476.71276.773.51173.577.310.577.37811.17880.511.880.58011.88079.511.379.573.711.473.774.311.774.373.912.173.971137173.212.873.269.311.969.369.611.469.689.923.989.993.70.593.7median 76.7median 11.9median 76.73.81.33.840.246.330.637.428.33630.637.224.839.227.543.924.951.822.263.121.468.120.165.819.17121.772.715.673.114.173.91272.81274.911.3761172.410.9731169.711.16811.46911.96812.270.612.568.512.564.812.769.512.966.612.663.311.761.624.6830.663.4median 12.5median 69.52.63hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CXRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Alienware x16 R2 P120FAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Alienware x16 R2 P120F audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

耗电量

240 瓦 PSU
240 瓦 PSU

空闲运行时,功耗略有增加,但对于大型 16 英寸 OLED 而言,这些数值仍然可以接受。在负载情况下,功耗值与 Razer Blade 16 相当,而在游戏时,G16 的功耗也如预期的那样略低于 Razer Blade 16。在压力测试中,我们测得的最大功率为 216 瓦,但很快就降到了 173 瓦左右。因此,随附的 240 瓦电源大小合适。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.14 / 0.38 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 9.4 / 13.6 / 15.8 Watt
Load midlight 115.4 / 216.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, SSSTC CA6-8D2048, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Power Consumption
-6%
-28%
-31%
10%
Idle Minimum *
9.4
10.9
-16%
6
36%
9.9
-5%
7.8
17%
Idle Average *
13.6
13.5
1%
16
-18%
14.5
-7%
10.9
20%
Idle Maximum *
15.8
13.7
13%
28
-77%
33.5
-112%
11.6
27%
Load Average *
115.4
120.2
-4%
130
-13%
97.5
16%
98.7
14%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
164.5
178.2
-8%
157.3
4%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
160.4
177.6
-11%
165.5
-3%
Load Maximum *
216.7
246.1
-14%
361
-67%
315.2
-45%
232
-7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
302
230

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø173.7 (169.9-217)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø10.3 (5.88-12.5)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø164.5 (153.7-179.3)

Power consumption with an external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø131.6 (127.6-152.1)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø130.5 (123.9-132.2)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø51.3 (46.9-65.8)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø134.9 (131.6-137.5)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø155.5 (148-165.8)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø29.2 (27.1-32.6)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø160.4 (154.8-172.4)

电池寿命

90 Wh 的电池容量保持不变,但华硕提高了续航时间。在 150 cd/m² 下进行的 Wi-Fi 测试中,它现在可以持续工作 9 个小时,而在全亮度下,它的工作时间刚刚超过 6.5 个小时。

电池信息
电池信息
充电过程
充电过程
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
9h 00min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
6h 43min
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh
540 min
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
478 min -11%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh
475 min -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
391 min -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (85 - 889, n=125, last 2 years)
386 min -29%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh
350 min -35%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
193 min -64%
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh
403 min
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
344 min -15%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh
331 min -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (167 - 578, n=34, last 2 years)
317 min -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
303 min -25%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX - 04/04/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
90 / 98 → 92%
Keyboard
92%
Pointing Device
100%
Connectivity
79 / 80 → 98%
Weight
65 / 10-68 → 94%
Battery
83 / 95 → 87%
Display
87%
Games Performance
91%
Application Performance
90%
Temperature
89 / 95 → 94%
Noise
69 / 90 → 76%
Audio
96%
Camera
38 / 75 → 51%
Average
68%
90%
Gaming - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
85.7%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 41.3%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Height
Display
1.
90%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘
64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $99.99
240W Rectangle Conn Charger ...
2. $1,869.00
ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 Gaming...
3. $96.99
240W Charger for Asus ROG Ze...
List Price: 4799€
1.9 kg17.4 mm16.00"
2560x1600
189 PPI
OLED
2.
87%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘
32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $4,499.99
Razer Blade 18 Gaming Laptop...
2. $4,999.00
Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop...
3. $5,698.00
Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop...
List Price: 4399€
2.1 kg17.4 mm16.00"
2560x1600
189 PPI
OLED
3.
85.5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $143.00
16.0" for Schenker XMG Neo 1...
2. $150.00
16.0" Screen Replacement for...
3. $155.00
Replacement Screen 16.0" for...
List Price: 3800 Euro
2.5 kg26.6 mm16.00"
2560x1600
189 PPI
IPS
4.
88.4% v7 (old)
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon: $3,001.87
List Price: 3200 USD
2.7 kg18.57 mm16.00"
2560x1600
189 PPI
IPS
5.
86.1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD
Amazon:
List Price: 4300€
1.9 kg16.4 mm16.00"
2560x1600
189 PPI
OLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 配备 RTX 5090 和 64 GB 内存的超薄游戏笔记本电脑 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 评测
Andreas Osthoff, 2025-04- 7 (Update: 2025-04- 7)