Razer Blade 16 2025 评测--游戏笔记本电脑现在配备GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑和更轻薄的机箱

Name: Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Brand: Razer

回归本源--这样行得通吗？

Razer Blade 16 2025 是首款配备全新 NvidiaGeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑的笔记本电脑，它运行 240-Hz OLED 面板。与此同时，Blade 16 再次大幅瘦身，这也意味着它现在使用了速度更慢的 AMD Ryzen 处理器。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 03/29/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AI AMD Blackwell RTX 5000 Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Wi-Fi 7 Windows Zen 5

结论 - 尽管机身纤薄，Razer Blade 16 的性能却给人留下了深刻印象

当然，Razer Blade 2025 的有趣之处不仅在于其全新的GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑，还在于其明显纤薄的机身。最大 TGP 为 160 瓦，Razer 仍能将全新 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑的速度提升到极致。

另一个妥协是处理器较弱。虽然 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 的速度绝不慢，但与速度更快的 HX CPU 相比仍有差距，这在 1080p 分辨率下尤为明显。不过，在原生 QHD 分辨率下使用 5090 笔记本电脑玩游戏仍然没有任何问题，尤其是在包括光线追踪在内的最高设置下，5090 笔记本电脑会显示出它的优势。得益于多帧生成技术，性能还能进一步大幅提升，在《赛博朋克》中几乎可以达到 200 FPS（QHD + RT Overdrive）。不过，如果你已经拥有一台配备 RTX 4090 的游戏笔记本电脑，那么只有当你能使用额外的 8 GB VRAM 时，升级才真正值得。另一方面，对于目前使用 RTX 3000 GPU 的用户来说，升级绝对是有意义的。

Test device courtesy of NVIDIA

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Blade 16 2025 的厚度仅为 17 毫米（约 0.67 英寸），重量约为 2 千克（约 4.4 磅），移动性很强，外壳的质量依然很高。但遗憾的是，表面仍然极易脏污。在维护选项方面，我们看到了退步，因为 Ryzen 处理器与焊接内存相结合。虽然键盘有所改进，但仍然比 ROG Zephyrus G16.

大型蒸发腔散热在噪音方面做得不错，但机箱温度有所上升。频率为 240 Hz 的 OLED 显示屏非常适合游戏，而且附带的色彩配置文件（P3 和 sRGB）校准效果极佳。只有 OLED 面板的 HDR 功能还有待改进。总的来说，新款 Razer Blade 2025 是一款出色的游戏笔记本电脑，尤其是移动性，同时还能为创意用户提供出色的性能。

Pros

+ 坚固耐用的高品质外壳

+ 比以前更轻、更紧凑

+ 极高的游戏性能

+ 240-Hz OLED，色彩配置精确

+ 效率明显提高

+ 2x M.2-2280 固态硬盘改进的键盘

+ 改进的键盘

Cons

- RAM 无法扩展

- PWM 闪烁

- 机箱温度高

- 表面极易脏污

- HDR 亮度低

价格和供应情况

新款 Razer Blade 16 可从Razer 网站订购，RTX 5090 选项从 4500 美元起。4 月 30 日开始发货。

$4,159.99

Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 - Intel Core i9-14900HX 14th Gen CPU - 16" OLED QHD+ 240Hz Display - 32GB RAM - 1TB SSD - Windows 11 - Chroma RGB - Snap Tap

$5,698.00
Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090-13th Gen Intel 24-Core i9 HX CPU - 16" Dual Mode Mini LED (4K UHD+ 120Hz & FHD+ 240Hz) - 32GB RAM - 2TB SSD - Compact GaN Charger - Windows 11
$3,998.88
Razer Blade 18 Gaming Laptop: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 - Intel Core i9 14900HX 14th Gen CPU - 18” QHD+ 300 Hz Mini LED Display - 32GB RAM - 1TB SSD - Thunderbolt 5 - Chroma RGB - Snap Tap

Bestpreis 4399€ computeruniverse.net

Razer Blade 16 (2025), Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 32GB RAM, 2TB SSD, GeForce RTX 5090, DE (RZ09-05289GN4-R3G1)

2. 4399 € Cyberport Stores Deutschland
3. 4399 € Cyberport.de
4. 4399.99 € Alternate

结论 - 尽管机身纤薄，Razer Blade 16 的性能却给人留下了深刻印象
规格
外壳 - Blade 16 现在明显更薄
设备 - USB 4 和 Wi-Fi 7
输入设备 - 刀片 16 现在的按键行程为 1.5 毫米
显示屏 - OLED，240 Hz 和 G-Sync
性能 - Ryzen AI 和GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑
排放 - 大型蒸汽腔
电源管理 - 改进电池寿命
Notebookcheck 整体估值

前几年，Razer Blade 16 曾是市场上速度最快的游戏笔记本电脑之一，而现在，Razer 推出了更轻薄的 2025 机型，更加回归本源。我们测试了这款配备 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370、32 GB 内存、2 TB SSD 存储和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑该机型的建议零售价为 4399 欧元（美国约为 4500 美元）。与旧款刀锋 16相比，价格下降了 450 欧元（约合 485 美元）。

规格

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (Blade 16 Series)

Processor

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 12 x 2 - 5.1 GHz, 78 W PL2 / Short Burst, 75 W PL1 / Sustained, Strix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)

Graphics adapter

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop - 24 GB VRAM, Core: 1515 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 160 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR7, 572.76, Advanced Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, LPDDR5-8000, dual-channel, onboard

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, ATNA60DL04-0, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 240 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

SSSTC CA6-8D2048, 2048 GB

, 1800 GB free

Soundcard

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm stereo audio port, Card Reader: SDXC

Networking

Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 17.4 x 355 x 250.5

Battery

90 Wh, 5780 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Six speaker sound system, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 280W PSU, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.09 kg, Power Supply: 795 g

Price

4399 Euro

Links

Razer homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳 - Blade 16 现在明显更薄

新款 Razer Blade 16 薄了 30% 以上（14.9 - 17.4 毫米，0.587 - 0.685 英寸），但基本设计没有改变。依然是黑色铝制外壳（一体式机身设计），具有很高的稳定性。底座无法翘起，键盘也只能通过用力才能将中央区域压得很小。尽管盖子很薄，但仍然非常坚固，铰链的调整也非常到位。在任何角度（最大 135 度）下，盖子都能牢牢固定，移动后也只有轻微的晃动。在这方面，Blade 16 与华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 相比优势明显。它的做工非常出色，给人一种品质极高的感觉。

雷蛇仍然没有采用大量带照明的设计元素。除了键盘外，只有盖子上的 Razer 徽标会发光（可以关闭）。Blade 16 的用户必须做好定期清洁笔记本电脑的准备，因为其黑色表面是真正的指纹磁铁。不过大多数时候还是很容易清洁的。

底部有一块区域被抬高，为散热提供了更多空间。但这在日常操作中并不明显，而且高度差也不像ThinkPad X9 15 那样明显。

在尺寸对比中，Blade 16、ROG Zephyrus G16 以及 MacBook Pro 16几乎完全相同，而其他游戏笔记本电脑的体积则明显更大。2.1 千克（约 4.6 磅）的重量也与 MacBook 相当，但 Zephyrus G16 轻了近 200 克（约 7 盎司）。280 瓦充电器的重量为 795 克（约 28 盎司）。

尺寸比较

Alienware x16 R2 P120F SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY DIN A4 ❌

设备 - USB 4 和 Wi-Fi 7

Blade 16 继续提供所有重要的连接。不过，它放弃了 Thunderbolt 4，只能通过 USB-C 适配器获得一个以太网端口。两个 USB-C 4.0 端口通过 iGPU 连接，因此当你添加外接显示器时，GeForce GPU 并不总是需要运行（HDMI 通过 dGPU 连接）。Blade 16 是一款 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑。

左：电源、2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen.2、USB-C 4.0（40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort 1.4、Power Delivery 3.0）、3.5 毫米音频接口

SD 读卡器

读卡器位于右侧。在结合我们的参考卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60）复制图像文件时，传输速率最高可达 193 MB/s，最低为 133 MB/s。插入的卡会伸出机壳约 1 厘米（约 0.4 英寸）。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	171 (169.48^min - 194.55^max) MB/s +29%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	168.9 MB/s +27%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	163.2 MB/s +23%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	133 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (19 - 197.3, n=68, last 2 years)	89.1 MB/s -33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	78.7 MB/s -41%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	76 MB/s -43%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	73 (51.3^min - 77.05^max) MB/s -45%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	258 MB/s +34%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	239.1 MB/s +24%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	193.2 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	181.81 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 263, n=67, last 2 years)	112.3 MB/s -42%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	89.9 MB/s -53%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	88.2 MB/s -54%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	87 MB/s -55%

交流

AMD Blade 16 配备了联发科技（MediaTek）的无线局域网模块（MT7925）。除了目前的 Wi-Fi-7 标准外，它还支持蓝牙 5.4。与华硕路由器配合使用，传输速率非常好且稳定。在测试过程中，我们没有遇到任何信号质量问题。

Networking
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1781 (min: 1669) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1708 (min: 1681) MBit/s ∼100%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1018 (min: 656) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1689 (min: 843) MBit/s ∼99%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1393 (min: 771) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1298 (min: 794) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1216 (min: 706) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1281 (min: 925) MBit/s ∼77%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1378 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1562 (min: 657) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1569 (min: 771) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1660 (min: 1606) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1650 (min: 1594) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1696 (min: 1662) MBit/s ∼99%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1577 (min: 796) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1604 (min: 1554) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1538 (min: 784) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1518 (min: 762) MBit/s ∼91%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1616 (min: 1558) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1591 (min: 1551) MBit/s ∼93%

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1781 (1669-1877)

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1708 (1681-1731)

网络摄像头

1080p 网络摄像头支持 Windows 的工作室特效，但不提供机械镜头盖。虽然图像质量不是特别好，但网络摄像头还是能胜任工作。此外，还有一个红外模块，可通过 Windows Hello 进行人脸识别。

ColorChecker Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: 13.65 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 19.77 ∆E

维护

机箱底盖仅用几颗螺丝固定，可以顺利拆卸。机身内部与旧款相比有一些很大的不同旧款机箱内有一个巨大的蒸汽腔和电池（旋入式），现在主要是散热装置。此外，还有两个用于 M.2-2280 固态硬盘的插槽，如果需要，还可以更换 WLAN 模块。不过，内存是焊接的。

可持续性

Razer 没有提供有关 Blade 16 可持续发展或环保认证的任何信息。

输入设备 - 刀片 16 现在的按键行程为 1.5 毫米

老式键盘刀锋 16的键盘是许多用户争议的焦点。虽然按压点很清晰，但按键行程却很浅，只有 1 毫米（约 0.04 英寸）。在新款 Blade 16 中，雷蛇将键程增加到了 1.5 毫米（约 0.06 英寸），这无疑改善了输入体验。不过，我们仍然不得不说，与其他游戏笔记本电脑相比，打字舒适度只能算一般。纤薄 ROG Zephyrus G16为例，其 1.7 毫米（约 0.07 英寸）键程的键盘要舒适得多。按照惯例，您可以单独更改每个按键的照明度，Razer 还提供了 Chroma 软件，让玩家可以根据具体情况调整照明度。

ClickPad 尺寸为 15 x 9.7 厘米（约 5.9 x 3.8 英寸），非常大，其玻璃表面具有出色的滑动特性。鼠标垫的底部区域可以进行物理点击，并发出均匀、饱满、不连续（因此是高质量）的点击声。

显示屏 - OLED，240 Hz 和 G-Sync

今年，三星 240-Hz OLED 的面板 ID 差别很小，但图像质量几乎完全相同，继续保持着极高的水平。色彩鲜艳，黑色饱和，响应速度极快。因此，这款显示器非常适合游戏。PWM 闪烁在所有亮度下都会出现，但其频率非常高，为 960 Hz，因此即使对敏感的用户也不会造成任何问题。

今年的亮度略低，约为 390 cd/m²，竞争对手通常会提供更好的数值。此外，HDR 的最大亮度也很低，仅为 431 cd/m²。另一方面，P3 和 sRGB 色彩空间的色彩配置文件在交货时已经非常准确（使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析），我们无法进一步改进显示器。


394 cd/m²	391 cd/m²	394 cd/m²
391 cd/m²	391 cd/m²	393 cd/m²
391 cd/m²	391 cd/m²	397 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

ATNA60DL04-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 397 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 392.6 cd/m² Minimum: 4.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 391 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
85% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 ATNA60DL04-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) BOE NE160QDM-NZA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Alienware x16 R2 P120F BOE B160QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 CSOT T3 MNG007ZA2-2, MiniLED, 3200x2000, 16", 165 Hz	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung SDC41AB (ATNA60DL03-0), OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2", 120 Hz
Display		-15%	2%	0%	6%	5%	3%
Display P3 Coverage	96.1	70.2 -27%	98.3 2%	95.3 -1%	99.9 4%	99.1 3%	99.7 4%
sRGB Coverage	99.9	98 -2%	100 0%	99.9 0%	100 0%	99.9 0%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	85	70.6 -17%	88.8 4%	86.6 2%	96.9 14%	95.6 12%	88.8 4%
Response Times		-3720%	-2435%	-3211%	-3%	-27%	-12110%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)	11.2 ?(5.2, 6) -5500%	3.9 ?(1.7, 2.2) -1850%	12.6 ?(6.6, 6) -6200%	0.22 ?(0.11, 0.11) -10%	0.24 ?(0.15, 0.09) -20%	43 ?(9.6, 33.4) -21400%
Response Time Black / White *	0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12)	5.1 ?(1.6, 3.5) -1940%	7.8 ?(3.9, 3.7) -3020%	10 ?(5.2, 4.8) -3900%	0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12) -0%	0.4 ?(0.2, 0.2) -60%	41.2 ?(24.5, 16.7) -16380%
PWM Frequency	960 ?(100)			5430 466%	960 ?(60) 0%	960 0%	14880 1450%
Screen		-56%	-46%	-25%	-7%	6%	47%
Brightness middle	391	530 36%	348.4 -11%	631 61%	416 6%	418 7%	632 62%
Brightness	393	497 26%	340 -13%	664 69%	418 6%	420 7%	616 57%
Brightness Distribution	98	85 -13%	90 -8%	91 -7%	96 -2%	98 0%	95 -3%
Black Level *		0.53	0.33	0.03		0.02
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.2	3.21 -168%	2.68 -123%	2.68 -123%	1.6 -33%	1.07 11%	0.6 50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.2	5.8 -81%	4.14 -29%	6.41 -100%	2.1 34%	4.04 -26%	1.2 62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.8	4.2 -133%	3.4 -89%	2.71 -51%	2.7 -50%	1.12 38%	0.8 56%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.226 ^99%	2.41 ^91%	2.27 ^97%	2.16 ^102%	2.29 ^96%	2.21 ^100%
CCT	6493 ^100%	6448 ^101%	6083 ^107%	6135 ^106%	6331 ^103%	6417 ^101%	6450 ^101%
Contrast		1000	1056	21033		20900
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *		1.44	0.42	2.68		1.07
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-1264% / -711%	-826% / -467%	-1079% / -815%	-1% / -3%	-5% / -2%	-4020% / -3003%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.13 ms rise
0.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.12 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.1 ms rise
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

960 Hz
Amplitude: 44 %

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8508 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

性能 - Ryzen AI 和GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑

为了在更轻薄的机身中使用更快的 GPU，Razer 将英特尔 HX CPU 更改为 AMD 的 Ryzen AI 移动处理器。您可以选择 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370或 Ryzen AI 9 365最高 64 GB 焊接内存（LPDDR5x-8000）。

测试条件

Razer 提供多种电源配置文件，我们在下表列出了这些配置文件。为了获得最高性能，我们在基准测试和测量中使用了性能模式。与去年的型号相比，我们无法使用自定义 模式进一步提高性能。

模式	CPU TDP	CB R23 Multi	GPU TGP	Time Spy 图形	赛博朋克 2077 QHD Ultra	赛博朋克 2077 风扇体积	最大风扇体积
静音	35 瓦	18,105 分	110 瓦	17,919 分	84.5 FPS	43 dB(A)	45.7 dB(A)
平衡	55/46 瓦	20,651 点	125 瓦	19,487 点	87.3 FPS	48.2 dB(A)	50.8 dB(A)
性能	78/75 瓦	23,804 分	160 瓦	22,082 分	98.6 FPS	48.2 dB(A)	53.4 dB(A)
电池	52/40 瓦	19,112 点	65 瓦	10,464 点	34.8 FPS	40 dB(A)	40 dB(A)

处理器 - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

产品 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370提供 12 个 CPU 内核，最大功耗为 78 瓦。基本上，它的多核性能不错，也比 2024 Zephyrus G16 配备的酷睿至强 7 155H.但仍然落后于酷睿 i9-14900HX当然，HX 处理器的功耗要高得多。在恒定负载下，性能保持稳定，但在电池工作状态下，多核性能下降约 20%。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3489 (3470.41-3505.08)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores): Ø3647 (3596.15-3782.15)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø5001 (4861.45-5267.14)

Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2753 (2708.56-2857.35)

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4648 (4505.52-4878.64)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2756 (2704.71-3019.32)

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4396 (4349.72-4455.83)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max ^-8! Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	86 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	85.4 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 ^-2! Intel Core i9-14900HX	75 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 ^-2! Intel Core i9-14900HX	69 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	66.6 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	63.4 pt
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	61 pt
Average of class Gaming	60.1 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 ^-2! Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	59 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY ^-2! Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	57.2 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F ^-2! Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	50.2 pt

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	2069 Points +61%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	2015 Points +57%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	1940 Points +51%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1284 Points
Average of class Gaming (331 - 2223, n=59, last 2 years)	1253 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1185 Points -8%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (621 - 1284, n=24)	1039 Points -19%

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	178 Points +51%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	131.7 Points +12%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	118 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (113.6 - 121, n=14)	116.4 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (68.2 - 138, n=60, last 2 years)	116.1 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	115.5 Points -2%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	36249 Points +52%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	31889 Points +34%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	28867 Points +21%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	27595 Points +16%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	23805 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	22724 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 39652, n=153, last 2 years)	21537 Points -10%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (10435 - 23805, n=24)	20153 Points -15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	19851 Points -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	19110 Points -20%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	18338 (17139.2^min - 18337.8^max) Points -23%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	2209 Points +8%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	2209 Points +8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2117 Points +4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2039 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1921 - 2049, n=17)	2011 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1973 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1906 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2252, n=153, last 2 years)	1887 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1876 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	1720 Points -16%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1620 Points -21%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	13824 Points +49%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	11960 Points +29%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	10968 Points +19%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	9250 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	8843 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6449 - 9250, n=16)	8259 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 15517, n=153, last 2 years)	8257 Points -11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7651 Points -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7299 Points -21%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7081 Points -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	6995 Points -24%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	844 Points +6%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	810 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	800 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (753 - 804, n=16)	789 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	777 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	735 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 866, n=153, last 2 years)	726 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	718 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	657 Points -18%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	622 Points -22%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	563 Points -30%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	5267 Points +50%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	4879 (4505.52^min - 4878.64^max) Points +39%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	4456 (4349.72^min - 4455.83^max) Points +27%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	3647 (3596.15^min, 3596.23^P1 - 3782.15^max) Points +4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3505 (3470.41^min - 3505.08^max) Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3371 (3327.79^min - 3370.98^max) Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 6074, n=156, last 2 years)	3329 Points -5%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2498 - 3505, n=16)	3185 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3019 (2704.71^min - 3019.32^max) Points -14%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3005 (2869.44^min - 3004.58^max) Points -14%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2857 (2708.56^min - 2857.35^max) Points -18%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	311 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	310 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	310 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	307 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (293 - 315, n=16)	306 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	303 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	280 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=153, last 2 years)	278 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	275 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	247 Points -20%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	238 Points -23%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	178 Seconds * -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	177 Seconds * -26%
Average of class Gaming (81 - 555, n=146, last 2 years)	175 Seconds * -25%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	163 Seconds * -16%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (140 - 192, n=16)	158 Seconds * -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	145 Seconds * -4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	140 Seconds *
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	113 Seconds * +19%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	106 Seconds * +24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	95 Seconds * +32%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	135229 MIPS +62%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	125676 MIPS +50%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	115695 MIPS +38%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	83714 MIPS
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 144064, n=151, last 2 years)	82818 MIPS -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	82463 MIPS -1%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (66154 - 83714, n=16)	77545 MIPS -7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	76331 MIPS -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	72583 MIPS -13%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	67227 MIPS -20%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	7406 MIPS +18%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	7018 MIPS +12%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7573, n=151, last 2 years)	6261 MIPS 0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6252 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (5859 - 6497, n=16)	6149 MIPS -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6127 MIPS -2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5781 MIPS -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5651 MIPS -10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	5452 MIPS -13%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	4502 MIPS -28%

Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	25760 Points +64%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	19451 Points +24%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	17559 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	17499 Points +12%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	15671 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	15230 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	14540 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 21668, n=122, last 2 years)	14405 Points -8%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (11973 - 15671, n=18)	14344 Points -8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	14031 Points -10%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	12825 Points -18%

Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	3880 Points +32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	3129 Points +6%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2964 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2942 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2780 - 2965, n=18)	2877 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2875 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3219, n=122, last 2 years)	2671 Points -9%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2570 Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2559 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2419 Points -18%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2199 Points -25%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	23086 Points +50%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	21642 Points +40%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	19372 Points +26%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	15407 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	14774 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 25855, n=150, last 2 years)	14737 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	14137 Points -8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13936 Points -10%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (11394 - 15407, n=17)	13871 Points -10%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	12759 Points -17%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	2195 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2136 Points
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2131 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2104 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1957 - 2136, n=17)	2076 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1902 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=150, last 2 years)	1902 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1846 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	1729 Points -19%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1700 Points -20%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	35.3 fps +23%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	30.7 fps +7%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	30.1 fps +5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	28.7 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	26.5 fps -8%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (20.3 - 28.7, n=16)	24.7 fps -14%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 42.9, n=150, last 2 years)	23.4 fps -18%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	22.7 fps -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	21.3 fps -26%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	20.7 fps -28%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (46.8 - 66.6, n=16)	54.1 s * -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	53.8 s * -15%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	53.6 s * -15%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=149, last 2 years)	47.7 s * -2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	47.5 s * -1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	46.8 s *
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	45.9 s * +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	42.9 s * +8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	39.7 s * +15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	32.9 s * +30%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	0.503 sec * -26%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.4859 sec * -22%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	0.4457 sec * -12%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=152, last 2 years)	0.44 sec * -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	0.4313 sec * -8%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (0.3892 - 0.529, n=16)	0.417 sec * -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	0.4111 sec * -3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	0.3979 sec *
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3789 sec * +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3658 sec * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

3505 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

241 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

310 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

800 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

9250 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

23805 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2039 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

118 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

1284 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	95 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	87.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	84.7 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	82.2 pt
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	77.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	68.3 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	62.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	59.5 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	37324 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (24673 - 37654, n=15)	32935 KRay/s -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	30829 KRay/s -17%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	27535 KRay/s -26%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	25682 KRay/s -31%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 81639, n=149, last 2 years)	22747 KRay/s -39%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	18676 KRay/s -50%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	17461 KRay/s -53%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	150728 Points +6%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	142039 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	136486 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	127908 Points -10%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (95655 - 147937, n=16)	127619 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=149, last 2 years)	108537 Points -24%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	96463 Points -32%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	90983 Points -36%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7588 MB/s +30%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7000 MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	6188 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	5824 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (4421 - 5843, n=16)	5363 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=149, last 2 years)	4935 MB/s -15%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	4534 MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	4278 MB/s -27%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	148966 Points +68%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138473 Points +56%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	130803 Points +47%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=149, last 2 years)	115098 Points +29%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	94794 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	91400 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	88891 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (41744 - 99088, n=16)	82034 Points -8%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	19115 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (16445 - 19115, n=16)	18299 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	18114 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	16268 Points -15%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	15857 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=149, last 2 years)	13248 Points -31%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	11095 Points -42%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	11092 Points -42%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	76668 Points +2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	75107 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	68467 Points -9%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (50357 - 79251, n=15)	67157 Points -11%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	64134 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=149, last 2 years)	55026 Points -27%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	48020 Points -36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	45127 Points -40%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	145389 MB/s +76%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	133395 MB/s +62%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	122937 MB/s +49%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=149, last 2 years)	105231 MB/s +27%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	88763 MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	84774 MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	82547 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (67015 - 96781, n=16)	78344 MB/s -5%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2239 MB/s +48%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2043 MB/s +35%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1863 MB/s +23%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1514 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1077 - 1530, n=16)	1376 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=149, last 2 years)	1347 MB/s -11%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1298 MB/s -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1201 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	20284 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13665 - 20608, n=16)	17952 KRay/s -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	16655 KRay/s -18%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	14791 KRay/s -27%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	13993 KRay/s -31%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 43430, n=149, last 2 years)	12215 KRay/s -40%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	10078 KRay/s -50%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	9329 KRay/s -54%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	54702 MPixel/s +6%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	53242 MPixel/s +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	52181 MPixel/s +1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	51417 MPixel/s
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	49616 MPixel/s -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	49305 MPixel/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (36752 - 51727, n=16)	47707 MPixel/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=149, last 2 years)	40198 MPixel/s -22%

系统性能

不出所料，新款 Blade 16 是一款速度极快的笔记本电脑，在合成基准测试中也表现出色。我们在测试过程中没有遇到任何问题。只有高级 Optimus 图形切换功能会导致一些轻微的延迟，例如在启动游戏时。

PCMark 10 / Score
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	9017 Points +9%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8401 Points +2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	8254 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	8254 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	8239 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	7993 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=132, last 2 years)	7837 Points -5%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	7251 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	11065 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	11007 Points +4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10915 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	10835 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=132, last 2 years)	10743 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	10626 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	10626 Points 0%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10036 Points -6%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	11681 Points +13%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11150 Points +8%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	10341 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	10341 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	10202 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	9937 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=132, last 2 years)	9912 Points -4%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	7934 Points -23%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	15394 Points +11%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	13889 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	13889 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	13516 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	13219 Points -5%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	12994 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	12872 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=132, last 2 years)	12404 Points -11%

CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2344 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	2255 Points
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2149 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1939 Points
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=113, last 2 years)	1896 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	1815 Points
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	1589 Points

CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2162 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	2042 Points
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2007 Points
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=113, last 2 years)	1799 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1755 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	1700 Points
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	1584 Points

CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	2795 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2660 Points
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2418 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2207 Points
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=113, last 2 years)	2079 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	2070 Points
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	1583 Points

CrossMark / Responsiveness
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2045 Points
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1851 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1769 Points
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=113, last 2 years)	1698 Points
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	1621 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	1595 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	1490 Points

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	543 Points +69%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	336 Points +5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	330 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	321 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	321 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=129, last 2 years)	303 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	281 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	279 Points -13%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	237 Points -26%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	353 Points +32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	306 Points +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	269 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	268 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	268 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 335, n=115, last 2 years)	266 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	246 Points -8%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	237 Points -12%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	594 ms * -38%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	535 ms * -25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	522 ms * -22%
Average of class Gaming (408 - 674, n=141, last 2 years)	502 ms * -17%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	450 ms * -5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	429 ms *
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	429 ms * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	428 ms * -0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	256.2 ms * +40%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		8254 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93766 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	93640 MB/s
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	89701 MB/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (72702 - 93640, n=16)	86776 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	81940 MB/s -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	78897 MB/s -16%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	78799 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=149, last 2 years)	66345 MB/s -29%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	102937 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (84635 - 102937, n=16)	97175 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	86939 MB/s -16%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	86387 MB/s -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	86010 MB/s -16%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	85092 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	84192 MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 102937, n=149, last 2 years)	69524 MB/s -32%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	103860 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (83907 - 108954, n=16)	98097 MB/s -6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	80589 MB/s -22%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	77562 MB/s -25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	75937 MB/s -27%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	75421 MB/s -27%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	73199 MB/s -30%
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 108954, n=149, last 2 years)	68634 MB/s -34%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	142.3 ns * -37%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	137.9 ns * -33%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (87.2 - 119.4, n=16)	108.5 ns * -5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	103.6 ns *
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=149, last 2 years)	96.6 ns * +7%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	96.2 ns * +7%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	83.4 ns * +19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	76.1 ns * +27%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试（上网、4K YouTube 视频、CPU 负载）中，采用当前 BIOS 版本的 Razer 笔记本电脑没有显示出任何限制。尽管有一个驱动程序给出了一些提示，但重要的 "中断到进程延迟 "值很低。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	16146 μs * -3178%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	2536.9 μs * -415%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2478.6 μs * -403%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2448.1 μs * -397%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1389.7 μs * -182%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	492.6 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

我们的测试设备使用的是著名的 SSSTC CA6 的 2-TB 版本，它的传输速率非常高，即使在较长的负载下也能保持稳定的速度。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

SSSTC CA6-8D2048

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6926 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4965 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 683 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 741 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 70.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 267 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 2206 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 3050 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	91.5 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	79.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	76.7 pt
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048	76.7 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	75.7 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	70.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	69.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	65.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	4224 (3741.6^min - 4224.02^max) MB/s +11%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3795 (3693.04^min - 3794.8^max) MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	3790 (2816.71^min - 3789.94^max) MB/s
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	3790 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	3541 (3501.11^min - 3540.88^max) MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=131, last 2 years)	3428 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3347 (3203.49^min - 3347.47^max) MB/s -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3015 (2943.98^min - 3014.55^max) MB/s -20%
seq write
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	4899 (4625.25^min - 4898.53^max) MB/s +46%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4826 (4760.33^min - 4825.54^max) MB/s +44%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=131, last 2 years)	3813 MB/s +13%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3794 (3745.51^min - 3793.5^max) MB/s +13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3750 (3377.21^min - 3749.92^max) MB/s +12%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	3362 (2028.5^min - 3361.51^max) MB/s
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	3362 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	3160 (3033.95^min - 3160.41^max) MB/s -6%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7140 (5903.9^min - 7139.54^max) MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	7106 (6065.83^min - 7105.62^max) MB/s +5%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	6823 (5715.47^min - 6822.87^max) MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	6780 (5762.77^min - 6780.16^max) MB/s
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	6780 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6673 (5801.28^min - 6672.72^max) MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	6523 (5649.96^min - 6522.56^max) MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=131, last 2 years)	6214 MB/s -8%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6860 (6824.33^min - 6859.91^max) MB/s +42%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	5248 (5141.58^min - 5248.1^max) MB/s +8%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	5208 (5161.3^min - 5208.07^max) MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	5092 (4641.78^min - 5091.77^max) MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4936 (4909.47^min - 4936.28^max) MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	4844 (4270.43^min - 4843.96^max) MB/s
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	4844 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=131, last 2 years)	4838 MB/s 0%
4k q1 t1 read
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	79.3 (64.25^min - 79.25^max) MB/s +15%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	71.4 (66.19^min - 71.35^max) MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	69.9 (69.26^min - 69.89^max) MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	69.2 (68.61^min - 69.17^max) MB/s
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	69.2 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming (32.6 - 95.9, n=131, last 2 years)	65.9 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	60.5 (49.54^min - 60.46^max) MB/s -13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	59.1 (58.3^min - 59.06^max) MB/s -15%
4k q1 t1 write
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	265 (258.55^min - 264.55^max) MB/s
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	265 MB/s 0%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	244 (238.59^min - 244.13^max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=131, last 2 years)	223 MB/s -16%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	209 (203.44^min - 208.84^max) MB/s -21%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	205 (202.97^min - 204.75^max) MB/s -23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	174.4 (160.08^min - 174.38^max) MB/s -34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	130.3 (127.94^min - 130.31^max) MB/s -51%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4920 (4883.21^min - 4920.02^max) MB/s +54%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	4245 (4210.56^min - 4245.12^max) MB/s +33%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3726 (3704.12^min - 3725.6^max) MB/s +17%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	3189 (3182.48^min - 3189.1^max) MB/s
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	3189 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2997 (2834.64^min - 2996.72^max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=131, last 2 years)	2627 MB/s -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	597 (590.16^min - 596.69^max) MB/s -81%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4522 (4451.05^min - 4521.93^max) MB/s +105%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3548 (3533.85^min - 3548.33^max) MB/s +61%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	2907 (2737.8^min - 2907.05^max) MB/s +32%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2673 (2401.6^min - 2673.33^max) MB/s +21%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	2210 (729.15^min - 2210.24^max) MB/s
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	2210 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=131, last 2 years)	2160 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	393 (388.68^min - 393.4^max) MB/s -82%

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	9365 Points +27%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	8139 Points +10%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	7379 Points
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	7379 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7040 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	6847 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=123, last 2 years)	6746 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	5595 Points -24%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3496 Points +9%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	3215 Points
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	3215 Points 0%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	3204 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2848 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2722 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=123, last 2 years)	2441 Points -24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	1402 Points -56%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4062 Points +58%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	3588 Points +40%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	3341 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=123, last 2 years)	3119 Points +21%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2766 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2686 Points +4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	2571 Points
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	2571 Points 0%
Seq Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5684.15 MB/s +12%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	5642.41 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	5351 MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	5081 MB/s
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	5081 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=123, last 2 years)	4904 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4371 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2272 MB/s -55%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5612.29 MB/s +35%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	4787.7 MB/s +15%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	4160 MB/s
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	4160 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=123, last 2 years)	3819 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3791 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3289 MB/s -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	2713 MB/s -35%
4K Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	72.9 MB/s +13%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	70.48 MB/s +9%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=123, last 2 years)	65 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	64.4 MB/s
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	64.4 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	61.1 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	59.28 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	55.9 MB/s -13%
4K Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	248.48 MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	230 MB/s
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	230 MB/s 0%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	213.62 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (79.4 - 512, n=123, last 2 years)	213 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	188.6 MB/s -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	180.5 MB/s -22%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	160.6 MB/s -30%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2933.61 MB/s +11%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	2642 MB/s
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	2642 MB/s 0%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	2569.34 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2439 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2350 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=123, last 2 years)	1878 MB/s -29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	794 MB/s -70%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3252.43 MB/s +69%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	3136 MB/s +63%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	2648.4 MB/s +38%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=123, last 2 years)	2528 MB/s +31%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2226 MB/s +16%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2168 MB/s +13%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	1926 MB/s
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	1926 MB/s 0%
Access Time Read
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	0.09 ms * -76%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=122, last 2 years)	0.05688 ms * -12%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	0.051 ms *
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	0.051 ms * -0%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	0.034 ms * +33%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.033 ms * +35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	0.024 ms * +53%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.024 ms * +53%
Access Time Write
Alienware x16 R2 P120F WDC PC SN810 1TB	0.055 ms * -162%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=123, last 2 years)	0.05135 ms * -145%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.025 ms * -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	0.023 ms * -10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	0.023 ms * -10%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	0.021 ms *
Average SSSTC CA6-8D2048 (n=1)	0.021 ms * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.016 ms * +24%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6908 (5460.14-6935.25)

图形卡

我们测试的刀锋 16 2025 配备了新的英伟达GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑配备 24GB VRAM（GDDR7）。图形切换通过 Advanced Optimus 进行，最大 TGP 为 160 瓦（135 瓦 + 最大 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost）。您可以在我们的我们的 GPU 分析.

合成基准测试的结果喜忧参半：旧版 Blade 16 在所有测试中都被超越，RTX 5090 笔记本电脑根据测试的不同领先 7% 到 20%，而 XMG Neo 16 中的 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑有时表现与旧版 Blade 16 相当。在创作者基准测试（PugetBench）中，5090 笔记本电脑与旧版 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑相比并无优势，但在剪切视频时，额外的 8 GB VRAM 代表着明显的优势。在 Procyon AI 测试中，5090 笔记本电脑领先约 15-17%。在持续负载下，GPU 性能保持稳定。

3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 6.4 | GFXBench

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	70760 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	69606 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	65956 Points -7%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (54052 - 70760, n=4)	65445 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	64341 Points -9%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	56772 Points -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	54073 Points -24%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	43383 Points -39%
Average of class Gaming (10741 - 72178, n=142, last 2 years)	42881 Points -39%

3DMark
Steel Nomad Score
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	5652 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (4791 - 6156, n=4)	5652 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	5102 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3915 Points -31%
Average of class Gaming (1522 - 6008, n=28, last 2 years)	3310 Points -41%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	3076 Points -46%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	15433 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (12749 - 17063, n=4)	15242 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	14107 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	13182 Points -15%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11574 Points -25%
Average of class Gaming (984 - 15721, n=83, last 2 years)	8674 Points -44%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	8098 Points -48%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	52065 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	51946 Points 0%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (42516 - 60880, n=6)	50202 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	46527 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	43518 Points -16%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	42558 Points -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	40259 Points -23%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	31033 Points -40%
Average of class Gaming (2913 - 56116, n=155, last 2 years)	30979 Points -40%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (19216 - 25129, n=6)	22965 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	22134 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	22082 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	20416 Points -8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	19878 Points -10%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	18627 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	16950 Points -23%
Average of class Gaming (2295 - 24599, n=151, last 2 years)	12903 Points -42%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	12405 Points -44%
Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	25160 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (18775 - 27291, n=3)	23742 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (18775 - 25160, n=3, last 2 years)	22476 Points -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	14212 Points -44%

Geekbench 6.4
GPU OpenCL
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (181670 - 234266, n=6)	212927 Points +6%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	199973 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	190820 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	190540 Points -5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	167047 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	161798 Points -19%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	153327 Points -23%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	124227 Points -38%
Average of class Gaming (4321 - 234266, n=121, last 2 years)	121375 Points -39%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	116455 Points -42%
GPU Vulkan
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	215511 Points
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	178909 Points -17%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (7393 - 231659, n=6)	170746 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	164105 Points -24%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	148584 Points -31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	132767 Points -38%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	117982 Points -45%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	115199 Points -47%
Average of class Gaming (4286 - 231659, n=113, last 2 years)	87927 Points -59%
GPU Metal
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	179746 Points

GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (243 - 267, n=2)	255 fps +5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	242.8 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	231.7 fps -5%
Average of class Gaming (27.3 - 243, n=5, last 2 years)	158.1 fps -35%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	152 fps -37%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	515.8 fps +11%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (466 - 557, n=2)	512 fps +10%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	466 fps
Average of class Gaming (58.3 - 518, n=5, last 2 years)	331 fps -29%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	327.6 fps -30%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		64778 points
3DMark Vantage P Result		111238 points
3DMark 11 Performance		45291 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		37321 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		18898 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		5652 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		22897 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score		25160 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU | v3.3 Classroom METAL | v4.3 Barbershop OPTIX

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming (10 - 95, n=144, last 2 years)	21.1 Seconds * -62%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	15 Seconds * -15%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (10 - 20, n=7)	13.1 Seconds * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	13 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	13 Seconds * -0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	13 Seconds *
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	12 Seconds * +8%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (16 - 156, n=7)	58.9 Seconds * -210%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 156, n=147, last 2 years)	37.6 Seconds * -98%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	22 Seconds * -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	20 Seconds * -5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	19 Seconds *
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	18 Seconds * +5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	18 Seconds * +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	17 Seconds * +11%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	305 Seconds * -45%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	305 Seconds * -45%
Average of class Gaming (123 - 962, n=152, last 2 years)	299 Seconds * -42%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	210 Seconds *
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	202 Seconds * +4%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	193 Seconds * +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	167 Seconds * +20%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	167 Seconds * +20%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (125 - 259, n=7)	164.3 Seconds * +22%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	17.8 Seconds *

Blender / v4.3 Barbershop OPTIX
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (48 - 286, n=3)	128 Seconds * -167%
Average of class Gaming (48 - 310, n=5, last 2 years)	126.3 Seconds * -163%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	48 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

DaVinci Resolve PugetBench | Photoshop PugetBench | Premiere Pro PugetBench

DaVinci Resolve PugetBench
Standard Score 1.1
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	8597 Points
Extended Score 1.1
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	8747 Points +7%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	8188 Points
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7802 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	5804 Points -29%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	5688 Points -31%

Photoshop PugetBench - Overall Score 1.01
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	13859 Points +56%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	9128 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	8879 Points
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8353 Points -6%

Premiere Pro PugetBench - Overall Score 1.1
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	12662 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	12412 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	12157 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11855 Points -6%

UL Procyon for Windows: Overall Image generation Speed | Image Generation Stable Diffusion 1.5 (FP16)

UL Procyon for Windows /
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	4.2 s/image * -121%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	4.1 s/image * -116%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	2.2 s/image * -16%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	1.9 s/image *

UL Procyon for Windows /
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	3322 Points
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	2845 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1518 Points -54%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1474 Points -56%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

现在我们来看看游戏性能，其中我们区分了原生测试和升级基准测试。在这一点上，GeForce RTX 5000 系列的全新多帧生成技术尤其引人关注。在原生测试中，你可以清楚地看到较弱的 AMD 处理器限制了 1080p 的性能，这也是新的 Blade 16 在这里表现不如预期的原因。从 QHD 分辨率开始，情况就发生了变化，在 4K 分辨率下，5090 笔记本电脑的优势非常明显，甚至在激活光线追踪后还会增加。

Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	99.8 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 ^-1! Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	88 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	87 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	75.1 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	72.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	67.9 pt
Average of class Gaming	65.7 pt
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62.8 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max ^-5! Apple M4 Max (16 cores), Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU	44.5 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	131.5 (62.2^min) fps +25%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	127 (70.6^min) fps +21%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	105.3 (74.7^min) fps
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	99.7 (13.5^min) fps -5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	95.35 (70.51^min) fps -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93.1 (64.5^min) fps -12%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	91.43 (74.13^min) fps -13%
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 158, n=91, last 2 years)	89.4 fps -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores), Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU	47.4 fps -55%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	187 fps +15%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	175.8 (48.1^P0.1, 125.3^P1) fps +9%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	162 fps
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	159.4 fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	118 fps -27%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	117.7 (30.8^P0.1, 73.7^P1) fps -27%
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 208, n=57, last 2 years)	112.4 fps -31%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores), Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU	99 fps -39%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	159.3 (3.25^min, 125^P1) fps +31%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138.1 (4.19^min, 83.3^P1) fps +14%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	136.2 (0.938^min, 111.1^P1) fps +12%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	121.6 (8.28^min, 83.3^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 168.2, n=131, last 2 years)	112.2 fps -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	107.1 (3.03^min, 66.7^P1) fps -12%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	106 (25.5^min, 76.9^P1) fps -13%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	196.9 fps +34%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	165.1 fps +12%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	147.4 fps
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	139.8 fps -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138 fps -6%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	137.5 fps -7%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=143, last 2 years)	116.6 fps -21%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	112.2 fps -24%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	403 (101.2^min, 295^P1) fps +26%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	369 (5^min, 269^P1) fps +16%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	359.8 (30.2^min, 253^P1) fps +13%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	319 (126.4^min, 227^P1) fps
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	293 (38.3^min, 184.1^P1) fps -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	288 fps -10%
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 420, n=139, last 2 years)	223 fps -30%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	204 (124.8^min, 152.6^P1) fps -36%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	194.6 (165.7^min) fps +42%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	188.1 (155.2^min) fps +37%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	164.5 (136^min) fps +20%
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=148, last 2 years)	148.1 fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138.7 (119.5^min) fps +1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	137.1 (113.2^min) fps
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	133 (114.6^min) fps -3%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	131.9 (114.9^min) fps -4%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	146.2 fps +72%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	144.5 fps +70%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	125.6 fps +47%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 166.2, n=152, last 2 years)	103.5 fps +21%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	95.6 fps +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	90 fps +6%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	89.3 fps +5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	85.2 fps

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (83.2 - 110.6, n=5)	101.8 fps +3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	98.6 (74.5^min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93.8 (53.7^min) fps -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	86 (70.4^min) fps -13%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	83.39 (67.14^min) fps -15%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	75.4 (25.4^min) fps -24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	68.1 (55.3^min) fps -31%
Average of class Gaming (24.8 - 106.8, n=71, last 2 years)	65.4 fps -34%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	57.12 (47.51^min) fps -42%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	138.8 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (103.1 - 150.5, n=4)	134.5 fps -3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	134 (37.2^P0.1, 78.7^P1) fps -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	133.2 fps -4%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	124.3 fps -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	99 fps -29%
Average of class Gaming (44 - 155.2, n=43, last 2 years)	90.3 fps -35%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	84.4 (15.2^P0.1, 51.2^P1) fps -39%

GTA V - 2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	156 (4.52^min, 111.1^P1) fps +29%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138.9 (0.96^min, 100^P1) fps +14%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (121.4 - 156.8, n=3)	136 fps +12%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	126.9 (3.16^min, 83.3^P1) fps +5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	121.4 (6.17^min, 83.3^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (36.9 - 163.3, n=81, last 2 years)	106.4 fps -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	103.4 (2.58^min, 58.8^P1) fps -15%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	102.7 (19.3^min, 71.4^P1) fps -15%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 2560x1440 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	162.5 fps +16%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (123.4 - 162.4, n=4)	146.8 fps +5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	142 fps +2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	139.5 fps
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	126.8 fps -9%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	120.8 fps -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	113.3 fps -19%
Average of class Gaming (32.5 - 169.2, n=99, last 2 years)	102.7 fps -26%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	90.8 fps -35%

Assassin's Creed Shadows - 2560x1440 Ultra High
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	52 (20^min, 22^P0.1, 30^P1) fps +4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	50 (31^min, 33^P0.1, 39^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (37 - 59, n=4)	49.3 fps -1%
Average of class Gaming (33 - 65, n=9, last 2 years)	48.3 fps -3%

Monster Hunter Wilds - 2560x1440 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (54 - 75, n=5)	68 fps +4%
Average of class Gaming (54 - 73.2, n=8, last 2 years)	66.5 fps +1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	65.61 fps
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	63.11 fps -4%

Alan Wake 2 - 2560x1440 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	87.1 (51.7^min, 55.3^P0.1, 66.2^P1) fps +14%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	78.4 (17^P0.1, 52.8^P1) fps +2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	76.7 (16.3^P0.1, 33^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (57.6 - 88.3, n=4)	76.3 fps -1%
Average of class Gaming (22.5 - 87.1, n=18, last 2 years)	65.9 fps -14%

F1 24 - 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	94.9 (50^min, 66^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (72.5 - 105.5, n=4)	93.2 fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	84.7 (69^min, 68^P1) fps -11%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	72.1 (2^min, 56^P1) fps -24%
Average of class Gaming (36.7 - 100, n=16, last 2 years)	66.6 fps -30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	58.5 (49^min, 47^P1) fps -38%

Black Myth: Wukong - 2560x1440 cinematic TSR 100
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (44 - 48, n=2)	46 fps +5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	44 (38^min, 40^P1) fps
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	39 (32^min) fps -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	39 (45^min) fps -11%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 44, n=7, last 2 years)	36.1 fps -18%

Indiana Jones and the Great Circle - 2560x1440 Very Ultra Preset
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	97.3 (65.6^P0.1, 75.1^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (66.1 - 112.9, n=5)	96.7 fps -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	95.4 (54^P0.1, 66.7^P1) fps -2%
Average of class Gaming (66.1 - 102.2, n=6, last 2 years)	93.6 fps -4%

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 3840x2160 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	50.7 (42.1^min) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (39.6 - 53.1, n=5)	49.7 fps -2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	39.61 fps -22%
Average of class Gaming (13.8 - 52.1, n=25, last 2 years)	35.4 fps -30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	32.9 (28.4^min) fps -35%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	32.5 (11.5^min) fps -36%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	25.46 (21.66^min) fps -50%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 3840x2160 Ultra Preset
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	79.1 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (62.2 - 84.3, n=4)	77.1 fps -3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	74 (36.7^P0.1, 52.6^P1) fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	73.1 fps -8%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	65 fps -18%
Average of class Gaming (22.9 - 82.8, n=22, last 2 years)	61 fps -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	57 fps -28%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	46 (28.7^P0.1, 37.9^P1) fps -42%

GTA V - 3840x2160 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (84.4 - 110.3, n=2)	97.4 fps +15%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	84.4 (11.7^min) fps
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	83.2 fps -1%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	82.7 (0.919^min, 55.6^P1) fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	69 (2.17^min, 43.5^P1) fps -18%
Average of class Gaming (33.6 - 110.3, n=26, last 2 years)	65.4 fps -23%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	63 fps -25%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 3840x2160 High Quality
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (96.8 - 101.3, n=3)	99 fps +2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	96.8 fps
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	70.2 fps -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	68.9 fps -29%
Average of class Gaming (32.6 - 101.3, n=36, last 2 years)	67.7 fps -30%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	55.2 fps -43%

Assassin's Creed Shadows - 3840x2160 Ultra High
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (35 - 39, n=3)	36.7 fps +5%
Average of class Gaming (34 - 45, n=6, last 2 years)	36.3 fps +4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	35 (16^min, 22^P0.1, 27^P1) fps
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	34 (10^min, 18^P0.1, 25^P1) fps -3%

Monster Hunter Wilds - 3840x2160 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	44.07 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (33.4 - 48.5, n=5)	43.8 fps -1%
Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 46.3, n=7, last 2 years)	42.1 fps -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	40.46 fps -8%

Alan Wake 2 - 3840x2160 High Preset
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	43 (12.9^P0.1, 25.7^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (33.4 - 47.7, n=4)	42.5 fps -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	41.6 (20^P0.1, 31.8^P1) fps -3%
Average of class Gaming (12.3 - 46, n=11, last 2 years)	38.3 fps -11%

F1 24 - 3840x2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (48.8 - 54.2, n=3)	51.7 fps +6%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	48.8 (41^min, 40^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (21.8 - 52, n=6, last 2 years)	41.2 fps -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	30.3 (25^min, 24^P1) fps -38%

Black Myth: Wukong - 3840x2160 cinematic TSR 100
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (27 - 33, n=2)	30 fps +11%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	27 (22^min, 25^P1) fps
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	23 (18^min) fps -15%
Average of class Gaming (12.6 - 27, n=5, last 2 years)	20.2 fps -25%

Indiana Jones and the Great Circle - 3840x2160 Very Ultra Preset
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (48.2 - 70.8, n=5)	62.6 fps 0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	62.3 (50.6^P0.1, 52.7^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (48.2 - 65, n=6, last 2 years)	59.4 fps -5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	58 (37.4^P0.1, 46.3^P1) fps -7%

Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS Chart

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø107.9 (97.6-110.3)

新一代GeForce 50xx 的主要功能是多帧生成。在我们使用《赛博朋克 2077》进行的测试中，我们看到了性能的大幅提升，尤其是在 MFG(x4) 中。但你必须小心，因为在游戏过程中，印象会发生变化，而且还有点取决于原生性能。例如，在 WQHD 分辨率下，MFG(x4) 运行得非常好，但在外接显示器的 4K 分辨率下，快速移动时图像看起来略显模糊。

Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty
分辨率	预设	原生	DLSS（自动）	DLSS（自动）+ FG（x2）	DLSS（自动）+ FG（x4）
QHD	Ultra	98.6 FPS	104.3 FPS	189.9 FPS	321.2 FPS
QHD	RT Overdrive	26.8 FPS	58.4 FPS	99.1 FPS	185.1 FPS
4K	Ultra	50.7 FPS	84.5 FPS	130.9 FPS	219.9 FPS
4K	RT Overdrive	12.6 FPS	43.2 FPS	69.2 FPS	121.5 FPS

通过《赛博朋克 2077》和《艾伦-威克 2》这两款游戏，我们还比较了 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑的游戏性能、 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑(刀锋 16 2024）和 RTX 3080 Ti 笔记本电脑(刀锋 17) 在所有可用的升频技术与最大设置相结合的情况下相互对比。在这里你可以清楚地看到，由于采用了 MFG（x4）技术，新的 5090 笔记本电脑与 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑相比优势明显。但在其他设置下，优势并不明显，不足以成为购买新产品的理由。另一方面，与 RTX 3080 Ti 笔记本电脑相比，其优势则非常明显。

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD DLSS	QHD	4K DLSS	4K
GTA V (2015)				121.6		121.4		150.7
The Witcher 3 (2015)				192		151		129
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	173.9	152.7	143.3	137.1				133
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	174.7	167.8	147.4			139.5		96.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	109.4	103.6	85.2					71.3
Strange Brigade (2018)	404	341	322	319		303		174.6
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	180	175	163.5	162		138.8	124.2	79.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)	125.8	115.4	117.8	105.3	104.6	98.6	72.2	50.7
Alan Wake 2 (2023)			95.2			76.7		43
F1 24 (2024)	236	236	236	133		94.9	80.5	48.8
Black Myth: Wukong (2024)				57	64	44	46	27
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024)				119.6	113.9	97.3		62.3
Monster Hunter Wilds (2025)				68.06	68.57	65.61	57.59	44.07
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025)				64	62	50	47	35

排放 - 大型蒸汽腔

噪音排放

Razer 使用两个风扇和一个巨大的蒸汽室进行散热。即使是非常简单的任务，风扇也几乎始终运转，产生约 30 分贝（A）的轻微呼啸声。在游戏时，噪音会达到 48 dB(A)，在压力测试中最高可达 53 dB(A)。但为了公平起见，我们还必须提到 ROG Zephyrus G162024 的噪音更大，尽管其游戏性能更低。我们的测试设备没有产生任何其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle		24.1 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB(A)
Load		45.5 / 53.4 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.1 dB(A)

	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	Alienware x16 R2 P120F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB	Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Noise		12%	-6%	9%	12%	-2%	9%
off / environment *	24.1	24.1 -0%	26 -8%	23.4 3%	23 5%	24.6 -2%	23 5%
Idle Minimum *	24.1	24.1 -0%	28 -16%	23.8 1%	23 5%	24.6 -2%	23 5%
Idle Average *	30.6	24.1 21%	29 5%	28.5 7%	23 25%	27.8 9%	23 25%
Idle Maximum *	30.6	24.1 21%	31 -1%	28.5 7%	23 25%	31.9 -4%	27.66 10%
Load Average *	45.5	42.2 7%	51 -12%	28.8 37%	39 14%	49.2 -8%	43.76 4%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	48.2	42.2 12%				52.3 -9%
Load Maximum *	53.4	42.2 21%	56 -5%	54.2 -1%	55.56 -4%	52.3 2%	50.37 6%
Witcher 3 ultra *			54	49.5	55.32		46.81

* ... smaller is better

温度

在闲置状态下，铝制机壳仍然非常凉爽，但在负载情况下，我们测得底部温度超过 50 °C（122 °F）。因此，在这种情况下，不应将设备放在膝盖上，并确保良好的通风。键盘的部分区域也会明显升温，尽管对游戏玩家非常重要的 WASD 区域仍然保持舒适的低温。在压力测试过程中，CPU 和 GPU 之间的比例在一段时间后会发生一些变化，但总体而言 GPU 仍然明显占优。在最大功率下，Blade 16 能够持续冷却近 180 瓦的功率。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


44.4 °C	48.3 °C	44.8 °C
38.4 °C	45.9 °C	39.3 °C
33.4 °C	36.4 °C	36.3 °C

Maximum: 48.3 °C
Average: 40.8 °C


46.2 °C	53.3 °C	44.9 °C
45 °C	51.3 °C	47.8 °C
34.9 °C	35.8 °C	34.2 °C

Maximum: 53.3 °C
Average: 43.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


27.4 °C	28 °C	28.3 °C
27.9 °C	28.3 °C	27.4 °C
25.5 °C	25.4 °C	25.2 °C

Maximum: 28.3 °C
Average: 27 °C


29.1 °C	30.1 °C	29.4 °C
29.1 °C	30.3 °C	29.6 °C
25.6 °C	25.8 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 30.3 °C
Average: 28.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 25.1 °C | Room Temperature 20.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


41.2 °C	44.6 °C	41 °C
33.8 °C	41.7 °C	37.2 °C
30.5 °C	32.3 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 44.6 °C
Average: 37.1 °C


45.6 °C	48.3 °C	42.8 °C
42.4 °C	46.9 °C	41.8 °C
32.6 °C	33.7 °C	32.2 °C

Maximum: 48.3 °C
Average: 40.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 36.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.3 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.4 °C / 97.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.5 °C / -13.5 F).

	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores), Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Heat		18%	4%	-12%	-20%	9%	6%
Maximum Upper Side *	48.3	42.8 11%	47 3%	51 -6%	56 -16%	45.9 5%	45 7%
Maximum Bottom *	53.3	42.3 21%	56 -5%	50.8 5%	53 1%	47.5 11%	45 16%
Idle Upper Side *	28.3	23.6 17%	27 5%	36.6 -29%	38 -34%	26.1 8%	29 -2%
Idle Bottom *	30.3	23.5 22%	27 11%	35.2 -16%	39 -29%	26.6 12%	30 1%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

在瘦身计划的影响下，扬声器的质量受到了一些影响。 ROG Zephyrus G16表明，在这方面还可以做得更好。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Alienware x16 R2 P120F audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.96 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.16 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 改进电池寿命

耗电量

在我们的功耗测量中，处理器的速度较慢和 GPU 的 TGP 较低当然是显而易见的。Blade 16 2025 在所有情况下都更加高效。它还只配备了一个 280 瓦的充电器（之前为 330 瓦），但这已经完全足够了。在压力测试开始时，我们测得的最大功率接近 250 瓦，大约 45 秒后降到 220 瓦。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.21 / 0.29 Watt
Idle	10.9 / 13.5 / 13.7 Watt
Load	120.2 / 246.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, SSSTC CA6-8D2048, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max (16 cores), M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Alienware x16 R2 P120F Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, MiniLED, 3200x2000, 16"	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		20%	-27%	-30%	-69%	15%	-34%	-32%	-29%
Idle Minimum *	10.9	4.7 57%	6 45%	9.9 9%	20.5 -88%	7.8 28%	16.9 -55%	10.6 ?(9.4 - 11.4, n=3) 3%	13.6 ?(2 - 39, n=124, last 2 years) -25%
Idle Average *	13.5	15.5 -15%	16 -19%	14.5 -7%	27.7 -105%	10.9 19%	17.8 -32%	22.1 ?(13.5 - 39.2, n=3) -64%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=124, last 2 years) -41%
Idle Maximum *	13.7	15.6 -14%	28 -104%	33.5 -145%	32.1 -134%	11.6 15%	19.6 -43%	23.2 ?(13.7 - 40.2, n=3) -69%	26.5 ?(9 - 101.1, n=124, last 2 years) -93%
Load Average *	120.2	125 -4%	130 -8%	97.5 19%	105 13%	98.7 18%	128 -6%	132.3 ?(115.4 - 161.2, n=3) -10%	103 ?(32.1 - 201, n=122, last 2 years) 14%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	178.2	116.2 35%				157.3 12%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	177.6	107.2 40%				165.5 7%
Load Maximum *	246.1	143.7 42%	361 -47%	315.2 -28%	323 -31%	232 6%	328 -33%	298 ?(217 - 431, n=3) -21%	246 ?(64.5 - 431, n=124, last 2 years) -0%
Witcher 3 ultra *			302	230	246		243

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø225 (215-246)

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12.8 (7.68-16.5)

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø178.2 (174.3-182.6)

Power Consumption with External Monitor

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø100.6 (97.6-122.6)

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø130.3 (107.6-145.5)

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31.8 (27.3-73.9)

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103.2 (99.8-106.4)

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø195.4 (160-203)

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.63 (6.03-12.4)

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø177.6 (171.1-181.9)

电池寿命

现在的电池容量比以前略低，只有 90 Wh。不过，电池续航时间仍然比以前要长，我们测得在全亮度状态下可使用近 8 小时或 5.5 小时。在电池工作状态下也可以玩游戏，但只能持续略多于一小时。Nvidia 的 "电池提升 "功能可以改善电池续航时间，该功能可根据情况将人工智能的性能限制在 30 FPS 左右。但效果并不理想，至少在《赛博朋克》中是如此（约 22-24 FPS）。

Battery Runtime

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd		1h 11min
WiFi Websurfing		7h 55min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		5h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 52min

	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max (16 cores), M4 Max 40-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh	Alienware x16 R2 P120F Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.99 Wh	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		124%	-28%	-59%	-45%	-18%	-27%	-21%
H.264	592	1305 120%	418 -29%		294 -50%		456 -23%	448 ?(129 - 884, n=58, last 2 years) -24%
WiFi v1.3	475	1078 127%	350 -26%	193 -59%	290 -39%	391 -18%	329 -31%	388 ?(85 - 889, n=123, last 2 years) -18%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd	71

Notebookcheck 整体估值

Back to the verdict

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 - 03/26/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

90 / 98 → 92%

Keyboard

86%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

74 / 80 → 92%

Weight

62 / 10-68 → 90%

Battery

76 / 95 → 80%

Display

87%

Games Performance

89%

Application Performance

90%

Temperature

83 / 95 → 88%

Noise

69 / 90 → 76%

Audio

85%

Camera

31 / 75 → 41%

Average

62%

87%

Gaming - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
84.1%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 32.7%

Possible Alternatives in Comparison

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Height	Display
1. 87%	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $4,159.99 Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop... 2. $5,698.00 Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop... 3. $3,998.88 Razer Blade 18 Gaming Laptop... List Price: 4399€	2.1 kg	17.4 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED
2. 91.7%	Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores) ⎘ Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU ⎘ 48 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $3,639.00 Apple 2024 MacBook Pro Lapto... 2. $5,679.00 Apple 2024 MacBook Pro Lapto... 3. $4,239.00 Apple 2024 MacBook Pro Lapto... List Price: 4699€	2.1 kg	16.8 mm	16.20" 3456x2234 254 PPI Mini-LED
3. 85.5%	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $143.00 16.0" for Schenker XMG Neo 1... 2. $150.00 16.0" Screen Replacement for... 3. $145.00 16.0" WQXGA 2560(RGB)×1600 ... List Price: 3800 Euro	2.5 kg	26.6 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS
4. 88.4% ^{v7 (old)}	Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: $2,628.30 List Price: 3200 USD	2.7 kg	18.57 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS
5. 83.9%	Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: $4,799.00 List Price: 4899 Euro	2.5 kg	22.7 mm	16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI MiniLED
6. 86.1%	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: List Price: 4300€	1.9 kg	16.4 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED
7. 91.1% ^{v7 (old)}	Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: $4,795.00 List Price: 4850 Euro	2.5 kg	22 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparison
Asus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min) N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	91
...
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE i9-14900, T1000	1245
Minisforum AI X1 Pro Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	1267
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1284
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1284
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1284
HP ZBook Fury 16 G11 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU	1286
MSI Sword 16 HX B14VGKG i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1298
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	45239
R9 7950X, Radeon RX 7700 XT	45241
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	45291
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	45291
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	45291
TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	45615
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	45722
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max) R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 5090	82642

结论 - 尽管机身纤薄，Razer Blade 16 的性能却给人留下了深刻印象

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

外壳 - Blade 16 现在明显更薄

尺寸比较

设备 - USB 4 和 Wi-Fi 7

SD 读卡器

交流

网络摄像头

维护

可持续性

输入设备 - 刀片 16 现在的按键行程为 1.5 毫米

显示屏 - OLED，240 Hz 和 G-Sync

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - Ryzen AI 和GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑

测试条件

处理器 - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储解决方案

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS Chart

排放 - 大型蒸汽腔

噪音排放

温度

发言人

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 audio analysis

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) audio analysis

Alienware x16 R2 P120F audio analysis

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 audio analysis

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY audio analysis

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro audio analysis

电源管理 - 改进电池寿命

耗电量

Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test

Power Consumption with External Monitor

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 整体估值

Possible Alternatives in Comparison

More articles related to this device

Transparency