Notebookcheck Logo

华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 笔记本电脑评测--搭载 RTX 4090 的超薄游戏本,潜力尚未发挥

蒸汽室冷却。

华硕只为最强大的 ROG Zephyrus G16 型号配备了蒸汽腔冷却系统。我们对配备酷睿至尊 9 185H 和GeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑的高端型号进行了评测。然而,这种散热方式真的比 RTX 4070 的散热方式更好吗?
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Meteor Lake Thunderbolt Windows

ROG Zephyrus G16 是目前华硕游戏笔记本电脑中最薄的流星。 几个月前,我们评测了配备酷睿至尊 7 155H 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 的机型。现在我们来看看配备酷睿至尊 9 185H 和 GeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑.除了更强大的组件外,我们还需要处理不同的散热问题。虽然 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑以下的配置使用的是由三个风扇和热管组成的传统散热装置,但高端机型(RTX 4080/4090 笔记本电脑)使用的是蒸汽腔散热。当然,我们想知道新的散热方式对性能和排放有何影响。

我们的评测设备编号为 GU605MY,售价 3649 元,除了酷睿超 9 185H 和GeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑外,还配备了 32 GB 内存和大家已经熟悉的 240 Hz OLED 屏幕。在本次评测中,我们将特别关注 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑配置和性能以及高端变体排放之间的差异。有关机箱、输入设备、显示器和扬声器的所有其他信息,请参阅我们对配备 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的 ROG Zephyrus G16 的评测。

华硕将很快推出搭载 AMD 全新 Strix Point 处理器(Zen5)的更新机型,不过,这些机型将仅配备 GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑.

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY (ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H 16 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1455 MHz, RAM: 2250 MHz, GDDR6, 555.99
Memory
32 GB 
, LPDDR5x-7467, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, glossy: yes, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB, 2048 GB 
, M.2 PCIe
Soundcard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: SD
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16.4 x 354 x 246
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: -cell, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.908 kg, Power Supply: 745 g
Price
4300 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86.1 %v8
07 / 2024
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg16.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
85.5 %v8
06 / 2024
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.6 mm16.00"2560x1600
83.9 %v8
06 / 2024
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg22.7 mm16.00"3200x2000
88.4 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg18.57 mm16.00"2560x1600
91.1 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg22 mm16.00"2560x1600

与配备 RTX 4070 的 G16 笔记本电脑的区别

ROG Zephyrus G16 的高端型号与配备 RTX 4070/4060 笔记本电脑的较弱型号在外观上没有区别。不过,内部散热系统的差异就显而易见了。较弱的型号总共使用了三个风扇和普通热管,而华硕为其较昂贵的型号配备了两个风扇的蒸汽腔冷却系统。

散热系统将重量从 1.817 千克增加到 1.908 千克,这与 16 英寸领域的其他 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑相比仍然很轻,因为对比设备至少重了半公斤。除此之外,Zephyrus 还是最薄、最紧凑的机型之一。RTX 4070 及以下配置的笔记本电脑配备了 200 瓦的 PSU(583 克),而从 RTX 4080 笔记本电脑开始,则配备了功率更大的 240 瓦 PSU(745 克)。

ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑
ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑
ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑
ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑

尺寸比较

364.74 mm 289.81 mm 18.57 mm 2.7 kg356.7 mm 253 mm 26.6 mm 2.5 kg357.7 mm 277.7 mm 22.7 mm 2.5 kg355 mm 244 mm 22 mm 2.5 kg354 mm 246 mm 16.4 mm 1.9 kg354 mm 246 mm 16.4 mm 1.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

性能--Meteor Lake 和 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑

Zephyrus 的高端型号目前配备了最快的流星湖处理器,即酷睿 Ultra 9 185H。在 CPU 性能方面,它落后于英特尔的 HX CPU。在这里找到的 115 瓦版本中,Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑离最高性能还有一定距离。安装的内存为 32 GB(LPDDR5x 7467),但由于价格和缺乏可升级性,我们更倾向于 64 GB。

 
 
 

测试条件

基本的能耗曲线保持一致,配备 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑的更强大机型还提供静音高性能涡轮增压三种能耗曲线。在下表中,我们列出了相应的 TDP/TGP 值以及对性能的影响。在下表中,我们还添加了 Zephyrus G16 的 RTX 4070 型号的数值,以便进行直接对比。原则上,采用更强大的蒸汽腔冷却系统的机型允许消耗更多的电能,但差异相当小,尤其是在处理器方面。在"静音"和 "性能"两个配置文件中,蒸发室冷却系统的噪音甚至比性能较弱的 RTX 4070 变体.按照标准,我们使用涡轮增压模式进行了基准测试和测量。

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4090 Laptop
能源概况 CPU 负载 CB R23 Multi GPU 负载 Time Spy 图形 赛博朋克 2077 QHD Ultra 最大风扇容量
静音 60 瓦 15,750 分 55 瓦 9,731 分 40.2fps 41.4 dB(A)
性能 100->70 瓦 17,452 分 90 瓦 15,205 分 60.2fps 48.1 dB(A)
涡轮 110->80 瓦 19,109 点 115 瓦 19,109 点 68.1fps 52.3 dB(A)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 Laptop
能源概况 CPU 负载 CB R23 Multi GPU 负载 Time Spy 图形 赛博朋克 2077 QHD Ultra 最大风扇容量
静音 60->45 瓦 15,869 分 65 瓦 9,042 分 32.6fps 41.5 dB(A)
性能 70->50 瓦 17,133 分 80 瓦 10,989 分 43.7fps 46.4 dB(A)
涡轮 95->70 瓦 18,372 分 105 瓦 12,312 分 48.7fps 52.4 dB(A)

处理器 - Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

核心 酷睿至强 9 185H酷睿至尊 9 185H 是英特尔 "流星湖 "一代中速度最快的移动处理器,但其性能明显落后于 HX 处理器("猛禽湖 "更新版)。正如我们刚才在对比表中观察到的,酷睿至尊 9 和酷睿至尊 7 在 Zephyrus G16 2024 和 Alienware x16 R2.后者也配备了 Core Ultra 9 185H。

不过,其他采用酷睿 i9 14900HX 的 RTX 4090 竞争对手的 CPU 性能明显更高,尤其是在多核测试中。ROG Zephyrus G16 的多核性能并不总能保持完全稳定,不过在持续负载情况下,10% 左右的不足可以说是相当小的。在电池模式下,处理器的最大功耗为 75 瓦,但这对多核性能几乎没有任何影响(约 8%)。其他 CPU 基准测试 这里.

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

02655307951060132515901855212023852650291531803445371039754240450547705035Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2756 (2704.71-3019.32)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø5001 (4861.45-5267.14)
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4648 (4505.52-4878.64)
Alienware x16 R2 P120F Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2753 (2708.56-2857.35)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4396 (4349.72-4455.83)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2533 (2383.65-2679.17)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
88.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
77.8 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
71.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
63 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
59.7 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
 
55.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
54.2 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
52.5 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
36249 Points +90%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
31889 Points +67%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
28867 Points +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)
21994 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
19110 Points
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18338 (17139.2min - 18337.8max) Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (12688 - 19851, n=18)
17685 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17267 Points -10%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2209 Points +18%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2117 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)
1894 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1876 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (1166 - 1912, n=18)
1789 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
1720 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1681 Points -10%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1620 Points -14%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
13824 Points +89%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11960 Points +64%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10968 Points +50%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)
8352 Points +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7299 Points
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7081 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (4843 - 7651, n=18)
6824 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6682 Points -8%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
844 Points +18%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
810 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)
727 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
718 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
693 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (442 - 735, n=18)
690 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
657 Points -8%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
622 Points -13%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
5267 Points +74%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4879 (4505.52min - 4878.64max) Points +62%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4456 (4349.72min - 4455.83max) Points +48%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)
3440 Points +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3019 (2704.71min - 3019.32max) Points
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2857 (2708.56min - 2857.35max) Points -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (1582 - 3165, n=20)
2719 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2679 (2383.65min - 2679.17max) Points -11%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
311 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
310 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)
278 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
275 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
264 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (191.9 - 281, n=18)
263 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
247 Points -10%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
238 Points -13%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
193 Seconds * -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (163 - 285, n=18)
191.9 Seconds * -8%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
178 Seconds * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
177 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)
169.4 Seconds * +4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
113 Seconds * +36%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
106 Seconds * +40%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
95 Seconds * +46%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
135229 MIPS +86%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
125676 MIPS +73%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
115695 MIPS +59%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)
85738 MIPS +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
72583 MIPS
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (51738 - 76331, n=18)
69105 MIPS -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68500 MIPS -6%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
67227 MIPS -7%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7406 MIPS +31%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7018 MIPS +24%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)
6322 MIPS +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
5651 MIPS
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
5452 MIPS -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5439 MIPS -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (4199 - 5781, n=18)
5418 MIPS -4%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
4502 MIPS -20%
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19451 Points +34%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17559 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17499 Points +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14540 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=112, last 2 years)
14207 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (9140 - 14540, n=18)
13580 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13323 Points -8%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
12825 Points -12%
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3129 Points +22%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2964 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3129, n=112, last 2 years)
2651 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2559 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (1490 - 2573, n=18)
2431 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2419 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2410 Points -6%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2199 Points -14%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
23086 Points +63%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
21642 Points +53%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19372 Points +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)
15098 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14137 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (9330 - 14230, n=18)
13130 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12905 Points -9%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
12759 Points -10%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2195 Points +19%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2131 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)
1898 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1846 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (986 - 1902, n=18)
1782 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1755 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
1729 Points -6%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1700 Points -8%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
35.3 fps +66%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.7 fps +44%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.1 fps +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)
23.6 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
21.3 fps
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
20.7 fps -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.9 fps -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (14.1 - 22.7, n=18)
19.9 fps -7%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
53.6 s * -25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
49.6 s * -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)
48.1 s * -12%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
47.5 s * -11%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
45.9 s * -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (34.5 - 62, n=18)
44.6 s * -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
42.9 s *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
32.9 s * +23%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.503 sec * -17%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.4859 sec * -13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (0.4313 - 0.759, n=19)
0.4712 sec * -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4654 sec * -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)
0.4366 sec * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.4313 sec *
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3789 sec * +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3658 sec * +15%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3019 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
192.9 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
275 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7299 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
718 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1876 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
19110 Points
Help
Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
99 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
91.1 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
71 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
64.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
61.8 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
 
58.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
58 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
30829 KRay/s +77%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
27535 KRay/s +58%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
25682 KRay/s +47%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)
21963 KRay/s +26%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
18676 KRay/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
17461 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
16431 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (9220 - 18676, n=18)
16273 KRay/s -7%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
150728 Points +66%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136486 Points +50%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
127908 Points +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)
106952 Points +18%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
96463 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
90983 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85461 Points -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (48865 - 96463, n=18)
84562 Points -7%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
7588 MB/s +77%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
7000 MB/s +64%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
6188 MB/s +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)
4920 MB/s +15%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
4534 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
4278 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (2394 - 4534, n=18)
3964 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3814 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
148966 Points +63%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138473 Points +52%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
130803 Points +43%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)
117347 Points +28%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
94794 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
91400 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90347 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (66785 - 95241, n=18)
89440 Points -2%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
18114 Points +63%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16268 Points +47%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
15857 Points +43%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)
13290 Points +20%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
11095 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
11092 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10641 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (7255 - 11392, n=18)
10503 Points -5%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76668 Points +70%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
68467 Points +52%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
64134 Points +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)
53819 Points +19%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
48020 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
45127 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41806 Points -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (24004 - 48020, n=18)
41496 Points -8%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
145389 MB/s +72%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
133395 MB/s +57%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
122937 MB/s +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)
109208 MB/s +29%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (53116 - 154066, n=18)
91410 MB/s +8%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
88763 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84774 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
79475 MB/s -6%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2239 MB/s +86%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2043 MB/s +70%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1863 MB/s +55%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)
1369 MB/s +14%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1298 MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1201 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (678 - 1341, n=18)
1156 MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1128 MB/s -6%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
16655 KRay/s +79%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
14791 KRay/s +59%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
13993 KRay/s +50%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)
11830 KRay/s +27%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
10078 KRay/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
9329 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (4428 - 10078, n=18)
8523 KRay/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8449 KRay/s -9%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
54702 MPixel/s +5%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
53242 MPixel/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
52181 MPixel/s
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
49616 MPixel/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
49305 MPixel/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49238 MPixel/s -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (44809 - 53918, n=18)
49034 MPixel/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)
40303 MPixel/s -23%

系统性能

令人稍感意外的是,Zephyrus G16 的高端版本是一款反应非常灵敏的笔记本电脑。虽然基准测试结果也不错,但搭载 HX 处理器的竞争对手还是表现得更好。不过,这在日常情况下并不明显。 由于采用了高级 Optimus 图形切换技术,当系统切换到 dGPU 时,启动游戏时偶尔会出现短暂的卡顿,不过这完全正常。

PCMark 10 / Score
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9017 Points +13%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8401 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
8239 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
7993 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
7993 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)
7813 Points -2%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7251 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7123 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11065 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
11007 Points +2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10915 Points +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years)
10836 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
10835 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
10835 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10038 Points -7%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10036 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11681 Points +18%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11150 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
10202 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
9937 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
9937 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years)
9909 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9208 Points -7%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7934 Points -20%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
15394 Points +20%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
13516 Points +5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
13219 Points +3%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
12994 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
12872 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
12872 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years)
12168 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10612 Points -18%
CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2344 Points +29%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2149 Points +18%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1939 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=144, last 2 years)
1910 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1815 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
1815 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1721 Points -5%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1589 Points -12%
CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2162 Points +27%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2007 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=144, last 2 years)
1809 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1755 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1700 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
1700 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1624 Points -4%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1584 Points -7%
CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2660 Points +29%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2418 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2207 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=144, last 2 years)
2099 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2070 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
2070 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1942 Points -6%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1583 Points -24%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2045 Points +37%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1851 Points +24%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1769 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=144, last 2 years)
1707 Points +15%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1621 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1490 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
1490 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1424 Points -4%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
336 Points +20%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
330 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=160, last 2 years)
304 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
283 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
281 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
281 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
279 Points -1%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
237 Points -16%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
306 Points +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
269 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
269 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.4 - 328, n=149, last 2 years)
268 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
256 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
246 Points -9%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
237 Points -12%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
594 ms * -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
548 ms * -5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
535 ms * -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
522 ms *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
522 ms * -0%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 674, n=175, last 2 years)
502 ms * +4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
450 ms * +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
428 ms * +18%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7993 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93766 MB/s
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
89701 MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89414 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (69929 - 95718, n=18)
84684 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
81940 MB/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78897 MB/s -16%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78799 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)
65546 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86939 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86576 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86387 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86010 MB/s
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
85092 MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84192 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (64619 - 87768, n=18)
80059 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)
69486 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
80589 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77562 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
75937 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
75421 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73337 MB/s -3%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
73199 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (51114 - 93871, n=18)
72390 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)
67309 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
  (121.4 - 259, n=18)
145.8 ns * -6%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
142.3 ns * -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
140 ns * -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
137.9 ns *
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
96.2 ns * +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)
93.8 ns * +32%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.4 ns * +40%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76.1 ns * +45%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试(上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,在当前 BIOS 下,评测设备在使用实时音频应用程序时显示出了局限性。不过,在 RTX 4070 型号.

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
16146 μs * -536%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2536.9 μs *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2484.4 μs * +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2478.6 μs * +2%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2448.1 μs * +4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1389.7 μs * +45%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

RTX 4090 型号还提供两个 M.2 2280 插槽。
RTX 4090 型号还提供两个 M.2 2280 插槽。

Zephyrus G16 为 M.2 2280 固态硬盘提供了两个快速 PCIe 4.0 插槽,这意味着存储容量可以快速、经济地升级。我们的评测设备配备了 2 TB 的三星 PM9A1a 固态硬盘,不过首次安装后用户还可使用 1.76 TB。在合成测试中,固态硬盘并没有完全达到我们的预期,但我们使用的仍然是一款速度非常快的存储硬盘,即使在持续负载的情况下,传输速度也能保持完全一致。其他固态硬盘基准测试可在 这里.

Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7104 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5141 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 397 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 415 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 70.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 130.1 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 364 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1030 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
91.7 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
79.9 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
76 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
 
75.1 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
70.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
70.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
65.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
47.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4224 (3741.6min - 4224.02max) MB/s +19%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3795 (3693.04min - 3794.8max) MB/s +7%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (3541 - 3908, n=2)
3725 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3541 (3501.11min - 3540.88max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)
3477 MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3347 (3203.49min - 3347.47max) MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3202 (3129.61min - 3201.93max) MB/s -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3015 (2943.98min - 3014.55max) MB/s -15%
seq write
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4899 (4625.25min - 4898.53max) MB/s +55%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4826 (4760.33min - 4825.54max) MB/s +53%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)
3818 MB/s +21%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3794 (3745.51min - 3793.5max) MB/s +20%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3750 (3377.21min - 3749.92max) MB/s +19%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (3160 - 4335, n=2)
3748 MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3160 (3033.95min - 3160.41max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2526 (2498.97min - 2525.81max) MB/s -20%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7140 (5903.9min - 7139.54max) MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
7106 (6065.83min - 7105.62max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (7084 - 7106, n=2)
7095 MB/s 0%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
6823 (5715.47min - 6822.87max) MB/s -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6673 (5801.28min - 6672.72max) MB/s -6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
6523 (5649.96min - 6522.56max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)
6318 MB/s -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5008 (4421.01min - 5007.74max) MB/s -30%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6860 (6824.33min - 6859.91max) MB/s +31%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (5248 - 5255, n=2)
5252 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
5248 (5141.58min - 5248.1max) MB/s
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5208 (5161.3min - 5208.07max) MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
5092 (4641.78min - 5091.77max) MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4936 (4909.47min - 4936.28max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)
4859 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3230 (3169.22min - 3230.03max) MB/s -38%
4k q1 t1 read
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
79.3 (64.25min - 79.25max) MB/s +13%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (69.9 - 80.7, n=2)
75.3 MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
71.4 (66.19min - 71.35max) MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
69.9 (69.26min - 69.89max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
60.5 (49.54min - 60.46max) MB/s -13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
59.1 (58.3min - 59.06max) MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
52.9 (51.15min - 52.91max) MB/s -24%
4k q1 t1 write
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
244 (238.59min - 244.13max) MB/s +87%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)
223 MB/s +71%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
209 (203.44min - 208.84max) MB/s +60%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
205 (202.97min - 204.75max) MB/s +57%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (130.3 - 230, n=2)
180.2 MB/s +38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
174.4 (160.08min - 174.38max) MB/s +34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
130.3 (127.94min - 130.31max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
128.4 (126.56min - 128.36max) MB/s -1%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4920 (4883.21min - 4920.02max) MB/s +724%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4245 (4210.56min - 4245.12max) MB/s +611%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3726 (3704.12min - 3725.6max) MB/s +524%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2997 (2834.64min - 2996.72max) MB/s +402%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)
2565 MB/s +330%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (597 - 3732, n=2)
2165 MB/s +263%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
604 (565.74min - 603.6max) MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
597 (590.16min - 596.69max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4522 (4451.05min - 4521.93max) MB/s +1051%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3548 (3533.85min - 3548.33max) MB/s +803%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2907 (2737.8min - 2907.05max) MB/s +640%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2673 (2401.6min - 2673.33max) MB/s +580%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)
2128 MB/s +441%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (393 - 2900, n=2)
1647 MB/s +319%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
402 (389.17min - 402.07max) MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
393 (388.68min - 393.4max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9365 Points +67%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
8139 Points +45%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7040 Points +26%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (5595 - 8367, n=2)
6981 Points +25%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
6847 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)
6733 Points +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
5595 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3272 Points -42%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3496 Points +149%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3204 Points +129%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2848 Points +103%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2722 Points +94%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)
2440 Points +74%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (1402 - 3272, n=2)
2337 Points +67%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
1402 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1020 Points -27%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4062 Points +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3588 Points
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (3490 - 3588, n=2)
3539 Points -1%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3341 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)
3109 Points -13%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2766 Points -23%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2686 Points -25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1808 Points -50%
Seq Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5684.15 MB/s +6%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5642.41 MB/s +5%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (5351 - 5637, n=2)
5494 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
5351 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)
4948 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4371 MB/s -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3662 MB/s -32%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2272 MB/s -58%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5612.29 MB/s +107%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4787.7 MB/s +76%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3791 MB/s +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)
3759 MB/s +39%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (2713 - 4295, n=2)
3504 MB/s +29%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3289 MB/s +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
2713 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1921 MB/s -29%
4K Read
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (72.9 - 75.6, n=2)
74.2 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
72.9 MB/s
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
70.48 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)
65 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
61.1 MB/s -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
59.28 MB/s -19%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
55.9 MB/s -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
42.2 MB/s -42%
4K Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
248.48 MB/s +38%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
213.62 MB/s +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)
212 MB/s +17%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (180.5 - 207, n=2)
193.9 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
188.6 MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
180.5 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
160.6 MB/s -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
157.9 MB/s -13%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2933.61 MB/s +269%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2569.34 MB/s +224%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2439 MB/s +207%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2350 MB/s +196%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)
1874 MB/s +136%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (794 - 2637, n=2)
1715 MB/s +116%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
794 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
612 MB/s -23%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3252.43 MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
3136 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (2867 - 3136, n=2)
3001 MB/s -4%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2648.4 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)
2524 MB/s -20%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2226 MB/s -29%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2168 MB/s -31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1458 MB/s -54%
Access Time Read
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.09 ms * -275%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)
0.05551 ms * -131%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (0.024 - 0.046, n=2)
0.035 ms * -46%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
0.034 ms * -42%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.033 ms * -38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.032 ms * -33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
0.024 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.024 ms * -0%
Access Time Write
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.055 ms * -139%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)
0.04751 ms * -107%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.025 ms * -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.023 ms * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
0.023 ms *
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
0.023 ms * -0%
Average Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
  (0.022 - 0.023, n=2)
0.0225 ms * +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.016 ms * +30%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7094 (6297.96-7117.29)

显卡 -GeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑

GPU-ZGeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑
GPU-ZGeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑

Zephyrus G16 可用于当前GeForce RTX 笔记本电脑的全系列型号(4050-4090),不过,其轻薄设计在快速型号中表现得淋漓尽致。在涡轮增压模式下 GeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑在涡轮增压模式下,RTX 4090 笔记本电脑的 TGP 只有 95 瓦+20 瓦动态增压,这意味着它与 175 瓦的最大配置(150 TGP + 25 瓦动态增压)相差甚远。潜在买家应该了解这一点,以免日后失望。在 GPU 基准测试中,我们可以清楚地看到与其他 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑型号相比的劣势,后者的速度在 15-26% 之间。即使是 RTX 4080 笔记本电脑中的 Alienware x16 R2(175W) 也比 Zephyrus G16 中的 RTX 4090 快一些。

配备 RTX 4070 的 Zephyrus G16 笔记本电脑相比相比,Zephyrus G16 与 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的优势为 50%,当然,这仍然是巨大的优势,尤其是考虑到其紧凑的机箱。基本上,RTX 4070 笔记本电脑(以及较弱的版本)与 Zephyrus G16 搭配使用时,可以更好地发挥其潜力。根据不同的使用情况,更大的显存容量(16 GB)可以带来额外的优势,例如在编辑视频时。

在持续负载情况下,GPU 性能保持稳定,但在电池模式下,GPU 允许消耗的最大功率为 55 瓦,这就是 GPU 性能大幅下降(-52%)的原因。其他 GPU 基准测试见 这里.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
100 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
93.9 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
92.1 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
90.4 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
82 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
79.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
61 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
52.7 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
69606 Points +29%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
65956 Points +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (54073 - 73027, n=42)
65041 Points +20%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
64341 Points +19%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
56772 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
54073 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)
43891 Points -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
37313 Points -31%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
51946 Points +29%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
46527 Points +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (40259 - 53059, n=41)
46365 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
43518 Points +8%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
42558 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
40259 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)
31461 Points -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
26568 Points -34%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
22134 Points +31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (16950 - 23292, n=43)
20950 Points +24%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
20416 Points +20%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
19878 Points +17%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18627 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
16950 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)
13142 Points -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10989 Points -35%
Geekbench 6.3 - GPU OpenCL
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
190820 Points +18%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
190540 Points +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (159127 - 209521, n=20)
187721 Points +16%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
167047 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
161798 Points
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
153327 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (4321 - 207373, n=111, last 2 years)
116410 Points -28%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
107953 Points -33%
3DMark 11 Performance
38012 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
30964 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
15660 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
3915 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
22 Seconds * -69%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)
20.8 Seconds * -60%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
15 Seconds * -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13 Seconds * -0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (9 - 19, n=39)
12.1 Seconds * +7%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12 Seconds * +8%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=184, last 2 years)
36.9 Seconds * -85%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
34 Seconds * -70%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
22 Seconds * -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
20 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (16 - 24, n=39)
18.3 Seconds * +8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
18 Seconds * +10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
18 Seconds * +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
17 Seconds * +15%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
330 Seconds * -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
305 Seconds *
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
305 Seconds * -0%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)
293 Seconds * +4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
202 Seconds * +34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (144 - 305, n=39)
199.1 Seconds * +35%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
193 Seconds * +37%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
167 Seconds * +45%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

GPU 测试中的情况在游戏基准测试中也得到了延续,因为 Zephyrus G16 中的 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑与 Core Ultra 185H 相结合,明显落后于配备 HX CPU 和 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑的竞争对手。笔记本电脑 Alienware x16 R2搭配酷睿 Ultra 9 和 RTX 4080 笔记本电脑的游戏性能也略胜一筹。此外,配备 Zephyrus G16 搭配 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑被全面击败,尤其是在 QHD 测试中。

总而言之,配备 RTX 4090 的 Zephyrus G16 笔记本电脑和快速 OLED 面板非常适合游戏。在原生 QHD 分辨率下,你可以毫不犹豫地以最高细节流畅地玩所有当前的游戏。不过,我们的《赛博朋克 2077》 循环测试表明,在运行要求较高的游戏时,游戏性能并不完全稳定,会出现小幅性能下降。更多游戏基准测试可在 这里.

Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
99.8 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
88 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85.8 pt
Alienware x16 R2 P120F -1!
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
69.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
68.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
67.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
53.5 pt
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
159.3 (3.25min, 125P1) fps +49%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138.1 (4.19min, 83.3P1) fps +29%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136.2 (0.938min, 111.1P1) fps +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)
113.8 fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
107.1 (3.03min, 66.7P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
98.8 (3.78min, 58.8P1) fps -8%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
131.5 (62.2min) fps +41%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
127 (70.6min) fps +36%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
99.7 (13.5min) fps +7%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
95.35 (70.51min) fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93.1 (64.5min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=80, last 2 years)
86.5 fps -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69 fps -26%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
196.9 fps +43%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
165.1 fps +20%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
139.8 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138 fps
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
137.5 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)
120.1 fps -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
100.8 fps -27%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
403 (101.2min, 295P1) fps +40%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
369 (5min, 269P1) fps +28%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
359.8 (30.2min, 253P1) fps +25%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
293 (38.3min, 184.1P1) fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
288 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)
229 fps -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
129.3 (30.4min, 84.7P1) fps -55%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
194.6 (165.7min) fps +40%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
188.1 (155.2min) fps +36%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
164.5 (136min) fps +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)
151.2 fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138.7 (119.5min) fps
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
133 (114.6min) fps -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
131.6 (114.5min) fps -5%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
146.2 fps +62%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
144.5 fps +61%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
125.6 fps +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)
108.5 fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
90 fps
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
89.3 fps -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81.2 fps -10%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
131.5 (62.2min) fps +41%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
127 (70.6min) fps +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (93.1 - 144.7, n=19)
120.8 fps +30%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
99.7 (13.5min) fps +7%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
95.35 (70.51min) fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93.1 (64.5min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=80, last 2 years)
86.5 fps -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69 fps -26%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93.8 (53.7min) fps +38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (68.1 - 103.9, n=19)
89.9 fps +32%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86 (70.4min) fps +26%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.39 (67.14min) fps +22%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
75.4 (25.4min) fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
68.1 (55.3min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (24.8 - 110, n=71, last 2 years)
65.2 fps -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
43.7 fps -36%
F1 23
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
149.2 (10min, 97P1) fps +73%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (86.2 - 149.2, n=9)
120.4 fps +40%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
113.2 (94min, 78P1) fps +31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86.2 (59min, 67P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (12.9 - 149.2, n=40, last 2 years)
70.8 fps -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
55.8 (45min, 43P1) fps -35%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
144.6 (2min, 80P1) fps +149%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (58 - 144.6, n=9)
83.7 fps +44%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
72.4 (58min, 56P1) fps +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
58 (36min, 46P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (17 - 144.6, n=31, last 2 years)
50.5 fps -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
36 (22min, 28P1) fps -38%
F1 24
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
127 (78min, 90P1) fps +44%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
113.6 (14min, 69P1) fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (88 - 127, n=4)
112.2 fps +28%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
88 (55min, 58P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (54.1 - 127, n=14, last 2 years)
78.2 fps -11%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
84.7 (69min, 68P1) fps +45%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (58.5 - 84.7, n=4)
73.6 fps +26%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
72.1 (2min, 56P1) fps +23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
58.5 (49min, 47P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (36.7 - 84.7, n=12, last 2 years)
55.8 fps -5%
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (118 - 208, n=7)
177.5 fps +50%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
159.4 fps +35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
118 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (34.5 - 208, n=45, last 2 years)
103.5 fps -12%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (99 - 155.2, n=7)
133.2 fps +35%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
124.3 fps +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
99 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 155.2, n=34, last 2 years)
82.2 fps -17%
Horizon Forbidden West
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
125.2 (73.2min, 82.8P0.1, 91.6P1) fps +55%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (81 - 125.2, n=3)
100 fps +23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
81 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (14.7 - 125.2, n=10, last 2 years)
66.7 fps -18%
2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
98 (65.7min, 67.6P0.1, 76.8P1) fps +48%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (66 - 98, n=3)
79.7 fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
66 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (24.1 - 98, n=9, last 2 years)
57.1 fps -13%
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023
1920x1080 Extreme Preset
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
179 fps +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (148 - 205, n=7)
175.1 fps +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
148 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (27 - 205, n=18, last 2 years)
112.5 fps -24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94 fps -36%
2560x1440 Extreme Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (113 - 162, n=7)
138.6 fps +23%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138 fps +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
113 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (48 - 162, n=15, last 2 years)
95.9 fps -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64 fps -43%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø70.9 (62.3-84.9)
lowmed.highultraQHD DLSSQHD4K DLSS4K
GTA V (2015) 172.6 107.1 103.4 139.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 172.2 150.8 150.3 138.7 135.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 183.5 168.4 138 113.3 68.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 138.3 111.7 90 75.7
Far Cry 5 (2018) 138 128 117 115 80
Strange Brigade (2018) 431 340 314 288 225 120
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023) 173 166 154 148 114 59
F1 23 (2023) 215 217 211 86.2 58 50.1 30.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 144 126 123 118 99 57
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 119.8 106.6 109.6 93.1 68.1 32.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) 204 189 155 148 113 73
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) 117 110 89 81 66 42.5
F1 24 (2024) 230 232 216 88 58.5 49.8 30.3
Black Myth: Wukong (2024) 67 40 44 39

排放 - 蒸汽腔通常噪音较大

噪音排放

风扇的风量主要取决于所选的能耗曲线。在空闲和低负载状态下,Zephyrus G16 仍然非常安静,即使在速度较快的配置文件中也是如此。在游戏中同时使用 "静音"和 "性能"模式时,蒸汽腔冷却的声音会比 RTX 4070 型号稍大一些,而且在没有耳机的情况下,只有使用 "静音 "模式才能真正正常游戏。在涡轮增压模式下,噪音达到 52.3 dB(A),这是 RTX 4070 变体的最大风扇音量。然而,竞争产品的噪音甚至略高于此,唯一的例外是 Blade 16,不过你也不能把 50 分贝(A)称作安静。我们的评测设备没有发出任何其他电子噪音。根据华硕的说法,我们在评测 RTX 4070 变体时遇到的第三个风扇的问题现在应该已经通过 BIOS 更新解决了。

ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 Laptop
能耗曲线 3DMark 06 赛博朋克 2077 压力测试
静音 30.9 dB(A) 41.4 dB(A) 41.4 dB(A)
性能 36.1 dB(A) 48.1 dB(A) 48.1 dB(A)
涡轮 49.2 dB(A) 52.3 dB(A) 52.3 dB(A)
ROG Zephyrus G16 RTX 4070 Laptop
能耗曲线 3DMark 06 赛博朋克 2077 压力测试
静音 30.4 dB(A) 41.5 dB(A) 41.5 dB(A)
性能 34.2 dB(A) 46.4 dB(A) 46.4 dB(A)
涡轮 41.5 dB(A) 52.4 dB(A) 52.4 dB(A)

Noise Level

Idle
24.6 / 27.8 / 31.9 dB(A)
Load
49.2 / 52.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.441.143.540.840.240.62538.538.432.435.430.637.3313434.627.129.128.332.74031.532.528.231.130.6315026.730.62425.724.8296327.62824.225.527.528.68027.228.621.421.824.9271002627.421.323.322.226.612528.22720.521.421.428.116026.929.219.420.920.128.12003331.321.421.719.131.725029.831.821.621.121.732.831530.333.118.719.515.632.140031.833.818.320.314.13350032.335.517.421.21234.663030.934.216.218.61233.480034.437.416.420.311.336.4100037.141.516.921.71139125038.342.417.723.610.940.9160039.342.116.424.2114220004043.915.520.711.142.7250038.643.914.819.811.441.8315035.540.213.616.211.939.4400032.338.113.414.512.236.2500031.837.1141412.535.5630031.738.513.913.712.536.5800026.535.213.413.412.732.61000021.729.913.213.212.927.11250019.427.313.213.512.624.6160001521.812.512.511.718.8SPL4852.327.831.924.651N5.8811.40.67.3median 31.8median 35.2median 16.4median 20.3median 12.5median 33.4Delta4.55.22.62.82.65hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
Noise
-5%
12%
9%
10%
9%
off / environment *
24.6
26
-6%
23
7%
23.4
5%
23
7%
23.9
3%
Idle Minimum *
24.6
28
-14%
23
7%
23.8
3%
23
7%
23.9
3%
Idle Average *
27.8
29
-4%
23
17%
28.5
-3%
23
17%
27.8
-0%
Idle Maximum *
31.9
31
3%
23
28%
28.5
11%
27.66
13%
30.1
6%
Load Average *
49.2
51
-4%
39
21%
28.8
41%
43.76
11%
34.2
30%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
52.3
Load Maximum *
52.3
56
-7%
55.56
-6%
54.2
-4%
50.37
4%
46.4
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54
55.32
49.5
46.81
46.4

* ... smaller is better

温度

在理想使用和执行简单任务时,机箱的金属表面依然非常凉爽,你可以毫不犹豫地将设备放在膝盖上。在玩游戏和压力测试时,我们测得后部中间区域的底座温度高达 47 °C。这并不值得担心,但在这种情况下,你不应该把设备放在膝盖上使用。在底座的上侧,键盘上方的中间区域容易发热,但键盘本身的温度明显较低,中间最高温度为 40 °C,两侧约为 36 °C。这意味着打字和游戏都不会出现任何问题。

Max. Load
 43.1 °C45.9 °C44.5 °C 
 34.9 °C39.9 °C36.9 °C 
 30.8 °C29.2 °C30.5 °C 
Maximum: 45.9 °C
Average: 37.3 °C
47.5 °C46.1 °C47.2 °C
32.8 °C44.5 °C39.5 °C
30.4 °C32.1 °C31.2 °C
Maximum: 47.5 °C
Average: 39 °C
Power Supply (max.)  45.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.9 °C / -3.4 F).
应力测试表面温度(顶部)
应力测试表面温度(顶部)
应力测试表面温度(底部)
应力测试表面温度(底部)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat
-6%
-32%
-23%
-4%
-8%
Maximum Upper Side *
45.9
47
-2%
56
-22%
51
-11%
45
2%
50.3
-10%
Maximum Bottom *
47.5
56
-18%
53
-12%
50.8
-7%
45
5%
48
-1%
Idle Upper Side *
26.1
27
-3%
38
-46%
36.6
-40%
29
-11%
28.8
-10%
Idle Bottom *
26.6
27
-2%
39
-47%
35.2
-32%
30
-13%
29.8
-12%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在 CPU/GPU 综合负载的压力测试中,Zephyrus 顶级机型无法稳定运行。CPU 功耗周期性地在 40-80 瓦之间波动,一小时后,平均功耗为 53 瓦。显卡的功耗没有如此大的波动,但仍然 "只有 "58 瓦左右。根据华硕的说法,在这种情况下,处理器的功耗应为 35 瓦,显卡的功耗应为 95 瓦,但我们无法再现这些数值。

CPU/GPU 压力测试数据
CPU/GPU 压力测试数据

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.246.32530.637.43128.3364030.637.25024.839.26327.543.98024.951.810022.263.112521.468.116020.165.820019.17125021.772.731515.673.140014.173.95001272.86301274.980011.37610001172.4125010.97316001169.7200011.168250011.469315011.968400012.270.6500012.568.5630012.564.8800012.769.51000012.966.61250012.663.31600011.761.6SPL24.683N0.663.4median 12.5median 69.5Delta2.6338.136.532.836.844.146.527.830.520.533.626.43217.438.721.549.818.447.619.255.422.260.819.163.217.561.71664.515.570.913.475.21275.113.275.612.875.91475.613.373.212.873.113.174.713.273.21377.813.574.913.972.714.465.31360.612.555.525.986.40.871.1median 13.5median 72.727.132.124.832.128.423.428.429.728.229.725.716.525.729.222.129.232.123.832.135.412.335.441.319.741.344.314.944.350.61150.654.616.554.655.414.755.46412.46466.110.966.165.89.265.8667.86670.78.770.768.88.668.867.8967.867.59.867.571.210.171.266.31166.366.811.266.861.111.761.161.511.861.563.21263.264.212.164.264.812.164.864.812.564.865.711.165.779237945.80.445.8median 64.8median 11.2median 64.84.81.94.837.831.737.838.824.638.841.621.341.641.718.741.744.720.444.745.119.245.152.820.152.859.717.359.764.414.164.472.614.472.676.213.876.281.514.581.582.414.182.480.813.680.879.911.779.981.411.481.476.71276.773.51173.577.310.577.37811.17880.511.880.58011.88079.511.379.573.711.473.774.311.774.373.912.173.971137173.212.873.269.311.969.369.611.469.689.923.989.993.70.593.7median 76.7median 11.9median 76.73.81.33.83032.83030.931.430.935.742.935.723.728.123.726.219.726.231.216.431.245.113.845.145.919.845.951.414.551.45913.95964.117.864.168.614.368.667.19.667.167.68.567.672.97.572.977.47.477.4717.77164.88.164.865.88.265.867.58.867.568.89.868.868.710.568.77010.67066.410.966.467.311.267.36411.56464.711.664.767126763.211.863.25510.75581.222.581.254.70.454.7median 67median 10.7median 673.62.53.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MYSCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090Alienware x16 R2 P120FRazer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.96 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Alienware x16 R2 P120F audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.16 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能量管理 - 比竞争对手更有耐力

耗电量

空闲运行时,消耗值代表了 ROG Zephyrus G16 较弱的变体,考虑到相同的 OLED 面板,这也不足为奇。游戏时,Zephyrus G16 的功耗约为 170 瓦,比 RTX 4090 的功耗高出很多,后者在游戏时的功耗至少为 230 瓦。在压力测试中,我们曾短暂观察到 232 瓦的最大功耗,随后很快稳定在 160 瓦左右。这意味着所提供的 240 瓦电源适配器大小合适。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.43 / 1.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7.8 / 10.9 / 11.6 Watt
Load midlight 98.7 / 232 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, MiniLED, 3200x2000, 16"
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-51%
-108%
-57%
-64%
5%
-97%
-59%
Idle Minimum *
7.8
6
23%
20.5
-163%
9.9
-27%
16.9
-117%
8.3
-6%
16.2 ?(6 - 32.3, n=29)
-108%
Idle Average *
10.9
16
-47%
27.7
-154%
14.5
-33%
17.8
-63%
12.5
-15%
23.1 ?(10.9 - 42.6, n=29)
-112%
Idle Maximum *
11.6
28
-141%
32.1
-177%
33.5
-189%
19.6
-69%
12.8
-10%
34.2 ?(11.6 - 57.9, n=29)
-195%
Load Average *
98.7
130
-32%
105
-6%
97.5
1%
128
-30%
71.3
28%
130.5 ?(79 - 201, n=29)
-32%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
157.3
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
165.5
Load Maximum *
232
361
-56%
323
-39%
315.2
-36%
328
-41%
169.1
27%
324 ?(221 - 418, n=29)
-40%
Witcher 3 ultra *
302
246
230
243
127.5

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø162.6 (146.8-232)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.99 (4.38-19)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø157.3 (139.6-164.6)

Power consumption with an external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø137.1 (124.9-148.9)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø146.2 (145.5-147.1)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø51 (42.9-59.3)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø142.4 (133.8-147.6)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø148.5 (143.7-157)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø21.4 (20.1-23.4)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø165.5 (143.1-192.6)

电池寿命

每个版本的 Zephyrus G16 2024 都配备了 90 瓦时的电池,但在 Wi-Fi 测试中,电池运行时间比 RTX 4070 版本短了约 30 分钟。在与 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑的直接游戏竞争中,Zephyrus G16 2024 的表现仍然优于 RTX 4090。在 150 cd/m² 和 60 Hz 的 Wi-Fi 测试中,全亮度下可使用 6.5 小时(120 Hz 时为 5.5 小时),60 Hz 时为 5 小时(120 Hz 时为 4.5 小时)。在设备开启的情况下,一个完整的充电周期需要 104 分钟;47 分钟后可获得 80% 的电量。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
6h 31min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
5h 03min
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
435 min +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
391 min
Average of class Gaming
  (85 - 889, n=153, last 2 years)
376 min -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh
350 min -10%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh
329 min -16%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.99 Wh
290 min -26%
Alienware x16 R2 P120F
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
193 min -51%
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
345 min +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY
Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
303 min
Average of class Gaming
  (156 - 578, n=46, last 2 years)
300 min -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh
265 min -13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.99 Wh
197 min -35%

Pros

+ 精致小巧的外壳
+ 亮丽的 240 Hz、G-Sync、OLED 显示屏
+ 非常出色的游戏性能
+ 出色的扬声器
+ 出色的输入设备
+ 2 个固态硬盘插槽
+ 良好的系统性能

Cons

- RTX 4090 笔记本电脑无法发挥其潜力
- 焊接内存,最大 32 GB
- 有限的最大 HDR 亮度
- 无 Wi-Fi 7

结论:RTX 4090 笔记本电脑未能发挥其潜力

评测:华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2024。评测设备由华硕德国提供。
评测:华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2024。评测设备由华硕德国提供。

华硕 Zephyrus G16 2024 是一款轻薄的游戏笔记本电脑,同时也适合内容创作者和多媒体用户等其他目标群体。采用 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑当然意味着图形性能是重点,但这也正是问题所在。从原则上讲,华硕提供最快的 GPU 型号是件好事,但尽管改进了蒸汽腔散热,薄薄的机箱还是需要做出妥协。在涡轮增 压模式下,RTX 4090 笔记本电脑的最大功耗为 115 瓦,根本无法发挥其潜力,普遍落后于竞争对手 20-25 %(即使是 Alienware x16 中的 RTX 4080 笔记本电脑也略快一些)。尽管如此,RTX 4090 笔记本电脑的售价还是不菲。这只是为了更紧凑的机身而不得不接受的妥协,但潜在买家应该注意到这一点。

与传统散热方式(RTX 4070 以下笔记本电脑型号)相比,蒸发腔的重量增加了约 100 克,而且在静音高性能能耗配置文件中,蒸发腔的噪音都要大一些。只有在涡轮增压模式下,这两种配置才没有区别。实际上,这意味着你在游戏时应该戴上耳机。

通过 ROG Zephyrus G16,华硕提供了一款非常紧凑的 16 英寸笔记本电脑,配备GeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑。然而,良好的移动性要求在性能方面做出妥协,而其他 RTX 4090 型号在游戏性能方面具有优势。

Zephyrus G16 的其他优缺点同样适用于高端配置,包括出色的扬声器和绚丽的 240 Hz OLED 面板。但是,一个很大的缺点是焊接内存,在 3649 元的高端版本中甚至没有 64GB 内存。

ROG Zephyrus G16 是一款小巧的 16 英寸笔记本电脑,适合追求最高图形处理性能的用户。不过,你不应该指望它能与更重/更大的竞争对手提供同样的性能。如果您只想获得纯粹的游戏性能,那么诸如 XMG Neo 16Alienware x16 R2只需提供更强的动力。

价格和供应情况

ROG Zephyrus G16 配备英特尔酷睿超 9 185H 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑,零售价为 3649 美元,目前可在亚马逊上购买。

注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY - 07/12/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
90 / 98 → 92%
Keyboard
92%
Pointing Device
100%
Connectivity
63 / 80 → 79%
Weight
64 / 10-68 → 93%
Battery
69 / 95 → 73%
Display
87%
Games Performance
86%
Application Performance
86%
Temperature
87 / 95 → 91%
Noise
67 / 90 → 75%
Audio
91%
Camera
38 / 75 → 51%
Average
65%
86%
Gaming - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
73.2%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 39.3%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 笔记本电脑评测--搭载 RTX 4090 的超薄游戏本,潜力尚未发挥
Andreas Osthoff, 2024-07-16 (Update: 2024-07-16)