data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77094/770941984f138d398f7221e304f3c29f1e6b0e90" alt="Review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE"
小米Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 智能手机评测--这已经是 Pro 吗?
犹豫不决
通过红米 14 Pro,小米提供了一款缺乏 5G 技术的设备。它拥有 200 万像素镜头、超广角摄像头和全新的联发科 CPU。Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 是一款令人满意的产品,还是一款平庸之作,我们的评测将为您解开疑问。Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论 -Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 是一款坐享其成的产品
在Redmi Note 14 系列中,小米选择了在设备之间进行小改动。这意味着有些手机的处境十分艰难。Note 14 Pro LTE 很难与更便宜的 Note 14 LTE 机型区分开来:新处理器实现了相同的性能,内存和功能设置也处于类似水平。显示屏采用弧面设计,主摄像头像素更高,还配备了超广角镜头。在内存相同的情况下,制造商希望你多掏 100 美元--至少根据零售价是这样。
只需额外支付 50 美元,小米就能提供 Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G.它配备了性能更强的处理器,可拍摄 4K 视频,并可接入 Wi-Fi 6 等 5G 网络。Poco X7 Pro Poco X7 Pro提供了更强大的功能。这意味着,Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 并不十分确定自己的定位,总而言之,并不十分出众。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在进行评测时,小米只销售Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 的一种配置,即 8 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间。这款设备在英国的零售价为 300 英镑。不过,在评测时,市场价格已经低了 100 英镑之多。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mediatek Helio G100 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $287.50 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ... 2. $7.99 zZjoOoj For Xiaomi Redmi Not... 3. $10.99 zZjoOoj for Xiaomi Redmi Not... List Price: 350€ | 180 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2400x1080 395 PPI AMOLED | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $6.99 Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design... 2. $5.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector C... 3. $3.99 Dretal for Samsung Galaxy A3... List Price: 379€ | 209 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" 2340x1080 390 PPI Super AMOLED | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400 ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G720 MP7 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $8.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P... 2. $7.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P... 3. $9.99 zZjoOoj For Xiaomi Poco X7 P... List Price: 430€ | 198 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED | |
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200 ⎘ ARM Mali-G610 MP4 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $6.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 2. $5.99 Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design... 3. $7.99 JETech Screen Protector for ... List Price: 329€ | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2412x1084 394 PPI AMOLED | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $287.50 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ... 2. $249.99 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G ... 3. $334.99 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ... List Price: 399€ | 188 g | 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2400x1080 395 PPI AMOLED |
Table of Contents
- 结论 -Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 是一款坐享其成的产品
- 规格
- 外壳 - Note 14 Pro 采用曲面显示屏
- 功能 - 小米配备了音频插孔和 microSD
- 软件 -Redmi Note 拥有 HyperOS 和缩短的更新计划
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 仅配备 WiFi 5。
- 电话功能和语音质量 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 和尖锐的声音
- 摄像头 - 红米相机的 200 万像素像素未达到预期水平
- 配件和保修 - 红米手机配有屏幕保护膜和小米贴心服务。
- 输入设备和操作 - 红米 Pro 显示屏上的输入错误
- 显示屏 - Note 14 Pro LTE 具有良好的亮度和高频 PWM
- 性能--Note 14 Pro LTE 配备了 Helio G100,但性能有待提高
- 排放 - Note 14 Pro LTE 配备杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos
- 电池续航时间 - Note 14 Pro LTE 充电迅速
- Notebookcheck 总体评分
小米推出了整个Redmi Note 14 系列。本评论涉及Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE。从设计上看,与价格更低的非 Pro Note 14 相比,弧形显示屏和后置摄像头的不同设计引人注目。
主摄像头和自拍摄像头的像素也有所增加,更新的处理器应能确保更好的性能。不过,对于这个价位的制造商来说,提供缺乏 5G 支持的 Pro 机型并不常见。
小米在智能手机的产品页面上列出了不同的版本。入门级机型提供 8 GB 内存和 128 GB 存储空间。还有 256 GB 存储空间和 8 或 12 GB 内存的机型。最大的型号有 512 GB 存储空间和 12 GB 内存。不过,销售页面上只列出了 8 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间的组合,这也是我们的评测机型。
有三种颜色可供选择:极光紫、午夜黑和海洋蓝。我们的评测机型为黑色。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - Note 14 Pro 采用曲面显示屏
功能 - 小米配备了音频插孔和 microSD
Redmi Note 14 Pro 配备了 3.5 毫米音频插孔、红外爆破器和可使用 microSD 卡扩展的内存。遗憾的是,USB-C 端口仍然是我们熟悉的样子,它只支持 USB 2.0 标准。不过,它至少支持 exFAT 和 NTFS 文件系统。
结合三星 980 Pro 固态硬盘,我们的平均传输速度达到了 26.17 MB/s。Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 还配备了立体声扬声器,并通过了杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos)认证。
microSD 读卡器
Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 的内存最多可使用 1 TB 的 microSD 卡进行扩展,该卡可插入混合插槽。在测试中,我们使用了参考卡 AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60。
使用该卡,我们获得了 25.51 MB/s 的平均传输速度。这使得Redmi Note 14 Pro 的速度明显低于
其前身小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 智能手机评测--配备 AMOLED 显示屏和出色摄像头的中端手机。 三星Galaxy A35 的传输速度是它的两倍。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件 -Redmi Note 拥有 HyperOS 和缩短的更新计划
开箱后,小米Redmi Note 14 Pro 预装了Android 14,使用 HyperOS 1.0 作为界面。除了小米和谷歌应用程序外,还安装了许多第三方程序。不过,这些程序都可以轻松卸载。
HyperOS 提供了大量自定义选项,但某些应用程序中的广告令人讨厌,尤其是在下载过程中。小米的更新政策不透明,Note 14 Pro LTE 接收更新的时间比 Note 14 LTE.制造商承诺提供三年的操作系统更新和四年的安全更新。在本次评测时,安全补丁是从 2024 年 12 月开始的。
可持续发展 - 小米注重长远发展
小米没有提供有关Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 碳足迹的任何信息。包装基本不使用塑料,但也并非完全不使用塑料。毕竟,这款智能手机要特别稳定,因此也要特别耐用。小米希望通过加强边角和内部吸震泡沫来实现这一目标。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 仅配备 WiFi 5。
Redmi Note 14 Pro 仅支持 WiFi 5。因此,与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 结合使用时,传输速度低于对比设备。与前代产品相比,数据接收速度略有提高。
在我们的测试中,连接非常稳定。与Redmi Note 14 LTE 测试不同的是,我们在 Pro 机型上也没有遇到突然掉线的情况。顾名思义,Note 14 Pro LTE 不带 5G 连接。LTE 连接快速可靠,覆盖的频段比便宜的 Note 14 LTE型号覆盖的频段更多。
电话功能和语音质量 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 和尖锐的声音
Redmi Note 14 Pro 的通话质量令人失望--至少对电话另一端的人来说是这样。来电者的声音清晰响亮。然而,红米用户的声音却显得尖锐、低沉,而且有些不连贯。声音听起来就像一直在使用免提功能。降噪功能也可以做得更好。
小米公司使用谷歌公司的软件,应用程序清晰易懂。
摄像头 - 红米相机的 200 万像素像素未达到预期水平
在广告中,小米强调了Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 的摄像头质量。据说,由于采用了人工智能优化算法,拍摄的照片动态效果特别好,但测试照片的锐度有所欠缺,色彩也比较暗淡。数码变焦在 5 倍放大时也能使用,但细节有点模糊。总的来说,图像没有达到我们的预期。
在光线不足的条件下拍摄的照片效果不错,但图像噪点较多。超广角摄像头的成像质量低于主摄像头。3200 万像素的自拍摄像头能拍出清晰的照片,但容易出现镜头眩光。Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 的 200 MPix 模式可拍摄全分辨率图像,专业模式可进行手动设置。
这款智能手机的视频质量不错,由于采用了 OIS,拍摄时可以保持稳定。此外,自动对焦和曝光调整工作可靠、快速。视频录制最高可达 1080p,主摄像头可达到 60 fps,但其他镜头只能达到 30 fps。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
RabbitPondUltra-Wide-Angle5x ZoomLow Lightdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e811b/e811b97bf606cfcbf88d3e44a434a8796c5ca754" alt="ColorChecker"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bddca/bddca3c4bb09a6b14887543d2d16fa3e6584d452" alt="ColorChecker"
配件和保修 - 红米手机配有屏幕保护膜和小米贴心服务。
Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 采用各种形式的零售包装盒。包装中还包括一个 45 瓦的电源适配器,但在德国并不随附。出厂时,显示屏上贴有贴合良好的保护膜,在测试期间没有脱落。制造商还随设备附送了一个柔软、贴合的保护套。
在德国,小米手机享有 12 个月的保修服务,但 24 个月的保修服务不受影响。制造商在德国为Redmi Note 14 Pro 提供 "小米关怀 "计划。基本套餐价格为 24 欧元(约合 25 美元),每个保险年涵盖两例损坏,即使是由用户造成的损坏。此外,44 欧元(约合 46 美元)还可以为设备投保失窃险。
输入设备和操作 - 红米 Pro 显示屏上的输入错误
显示屏 - Note 14 Pro LTE 具有良好的亮度和高频 PWM
Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 采用长宽比为 20:9 的 6.67 英寸 AMOLED 面板。显示屏的最大刷新率为 120 Hz,根据 DRM 信息,中间有 30、60 和 90 Hz 三档。软件出厂设置会根据内容自动调整刷新率。
在环境光传感器激活的情况下,我们测得的最大亮度为 1,356 cd/m²,这意味着红米的亮度明显高于对比设备。在日常生活中,亮度分布的变化并不明显。在没有亮度传感器的情况下,Note 14 Pro 的最高亮度为 488 尼特。在使用 HDR 和 APL18 内容时,显示屏会变得更亮,我们在 APL18 测试中测得的亮度为 1,654 尼特,在使用 HDR 内容时测得的亮度为 1,715 cd/m²。
我们的测量证实了在两种不同频率下观察到的屏幕闪烁现象。基本的 120 Hz 闪烁和 1666 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光。根据制造商的说法,PWM 调光频率应高达 1920 赫兹。
在我们的测试中,永久调节的环境光传感器令人讨厌。特别是在建筑物中,智能手机会不断上下切换亮度,在过亮或过暗的亮度水平之间波动。
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1298 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Nothing Phone (2a) AMOLED, 2412x1084, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -3% | 18% | 13% | 3% | |
Brightness middle | 1298 | 904 -30% | 1034 -20% | 1033 -20% | 994 -23% |
Brightness | 1303 | 912 -30% | 1041 -20% | 1042 -20% | 979 -25% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 97 4% | 97 4% | 96 3% | 95 2% |
Black Level * | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 2.1 -17% | 1 44% | 1.6 11% | 1.36 24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.5 | 2.8 49% | 2.2 60% | 2.5 55% | 3.61 34% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 2.2 4% | 1.4 39% | 1.2 48% | 2.2 4% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.1 105% | 2.22 99% | 2.07 106% | 2.287 96% |
CCT | 6104 106% | 6478 100% | 6553 99% | 6482 100% | 6392 102% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz Amplitude: 15.96 % Secondary Frequency: 1666 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8600 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
使用固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅曲线放大版可在信息框中查看)。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.894 ms rise | |
↘ 0.737 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2.06 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.02 ms rise | |
↘ 1.036 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). |
性能--Note 14 Pro LTE 配备了 Helio G100,但性能有待提高
基准测试结果令人惊喜。Redmi Note 14 Pro 配备了 联发科 Helio G100取得了与去年的 Redmi Note 13 Pro的 联发科 Helio G99.不过,在 Geekbench 和 Antutu 基准测试中,对比设备的表现各有千秋,尤其是 Poco X7 Pro的 Dimensity 8400.
不过,在日常情况下,Redmi Note 14 Pro 的运行要比 Poco X7 Pro 流畅得多。 Redmi Note 14 LTE相比,同样使用 Helio G99.
CrossMark - Overall | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=165, last 2 years) | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE | |
Average Mediatek Helio G100 () |
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE | |
Average Mediatek Helio G100 () | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G |
AImark - Score v3.x | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=141, last 2 years) | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE | |
Average Mediatek Helio G100 () | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G |
在 GPU 方面,小米选择使用与前代产品相同的硬件 以及更便宜的以及更便宜的 Redmi Note 14 LTE - 的 Mali-G57 MP2图形芯片。这意味着小米智能手机在与竞争设备的较量中毫无胜算,在各项基准测试中均名列倒数第一。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro |
3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro |
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163) | |
Average of class Smartphone (111.1 - 387, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (chrome 132) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G100 () | |
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (chrome 132) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G100 () |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163) | |
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (chrome 132) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G100 () |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163) | |
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (chrome 132) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G100 () |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=207, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (chrome 132) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G100 () | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G (Chrome 123) | |
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average Mediatek Helio G100 () | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (chrome 132) | |
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100) | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | Nothing Phone (2a) | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -42% | 110% | 25% | 4% | 1% | 72% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 933 | 529.32 -43% | 3969.01 325% | 1028.37 10% | 933.8 0% | 904 ? -3% | 1962 ? 110% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 798 | 270 -66% | 1813.29 127% | 952 19% | 795.4 0% | 721 ? -10% | 1577 ? 98% |
Random Read 4KB | 218 | 244.24 12% | 362.61 66% | 273.19 25% | 246.8 13% | 230 ? 6% | 280 ? 28% |
Random Write 4KB | 215 | 62.59 -71% | 49.17 -77% | 311.8 45% | 222.2 3% | 240 ? 12% | 322 ? 50% |
排放 - Note 14 Pro LTE 配备杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos
温度 -Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 始终保持低温
Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 无论是在日常生活中还是在玩游戏或看电影时,都能保持舒适的温度。在 "Burnout "基准测试的极端负载下,我们记录到设备顶部的最高温度为 37.8 摄氏度。而在底部,最高温度仅为 35 摄氏度。
在压力测试中,Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 非常稳定,几乎没有任何跳动。Steel Nomad 压力测试被该设备中止。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro |
扬声器 - 小米提供立体声和音频插孔
Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 配备了立体声扬声器,并通过了杜比全景声认证。声音在设备顶部通过听筒向前方和通过边框上的开口向上方发出。
与前代产品相比,中音均衡,这是一个明显的改进。而低音或低频则没有。此外,在音量较大时,后部振动明显。
Redmi Note 14 Pro 有一个耳机插孔。测得的信噪比为 74.09 dBFS,属于中等水平。在我们的测试中,这款智能手机可以轻松连接各种蓝牙耳机。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - Note 14 Pro LTE 充电迅速
功耗 - 红米手机经济实惠
Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 的低级计算能力主要体现在智能手机的低能耗上。不过,该设备并非在每个领域都是佼佼者。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 5500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 6000 mAh | Nothing Phone (2a) 5000 mAh | Average Mediatek Helio G100 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -34% | -24% | -18% | 0% | -19% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.13 | 0.89 21% | 1.07 5% | 0.81 28% | 1.13 ? -0% | 0.872 ? 23% |
Idle Average * | 1.21 | 1.99 -64% | 1.29 -7% | 2.01 -66% | 1.21 ? -0% | 1.448 ? -20% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.25 | 2.14 -71% | 1.36 -9% | 2.07 -66% | 1.25 ? -0% | 1.596 ? -28% |
Load Average * | 5.35 | 4.57 15% | 6.14 -15% | 4.16 22% | 5.35 ? -0% | 6.89 ? -29% |
Load Maximum * | 7.25 | 12.31 -70% | 13.94 -92% | 7.91 -9% | 7.25 ? -0% | 10.3 ? -42% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池续航时间 - Note 14 Pro LTE 表现一般
在现实的 WiFi 网上冲浪测试中,Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 的运行时间达到了 17 小时,超过了 Note 13 Pro 4G。 Note 13 Pro 4G不过,14 Pro LTE 的电池容量为 5,500 毫安时,比 Note 13 Pro 4G 大 10%。
手机 Nothing Phone 2a采用了更强大的处理器,在容量为 5,000 mAh 的情况下,几乎可以达到相同的续航时间。在日常生活中,只要不玩游戏或观看长时间视频,就可以使用两天而无需充电。
Note 14 Pro LTE 的最大充电功率为 45 瓦,不支持无线充电。这款智能手机从 1% 充至 60% 需要 35 分钟,从 1% 充至 100% 需要 75 分钟。
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 有一个问题:它几乎不比便宜得多的 Note 14 LTE 好多少,也不比配置更好的 Note 14 Pro 5G 便宜多少。在性能方面,这款智能手机被这个价位的同类设备甩在了后面。
相机性能还不错,但没有达到我们的预期。明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏和均衡的扬声器给人留下了积极的印象。Note 14 Pro LTE 还配备了 NFC、内存扩展和音频插孔。不过,就其性能而言,该设备的价格过于昂贵。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
- 02/21/2025 v8
Benedikt Winkel
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.