Notebookcheck Logo
Review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE

小米Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 智能手机评测--这已经是 Pro 吗?

犹豫不决

通过红米 14 Pro,小米提供了一款缺乏 5G 技术的设备。它拥有 200 万像素镜头、超广角摄像头和全新的联发科 CPU。Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 是一款令人满意的产品,还是一款平庸之作,我们的评测将为您解开疑问。
Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Smartphone Touchscreen

结论 -Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 是一款坐享其成的产品

在Redmi Note 14 系列中,小米选择了在设备之间进行小改动。这意味着有些手机的处境十分艰难。Note 14 Pro LTE 很难与更便宜的 Note 14 LTE 机型区分开来:新处理器实现了相同的性能,内存和功能设置也处于类似水平。显示屏采用弧面设计,主摄像头像素更高,还配备了超广角镜头。在内存相同的情况下,制造商希望你多掏 100 美元--至少根据零售价是这样。

只需额外支付 50 美元,小米就能提供 Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G.它配备了性能更强的处理器,可拍摄 4K 视频,并可接入 Wi-Fi 6 等 5G 网络。Poco X7 Pro Poco X7 Pro提供了更强大的功能。这意味着,Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 并不十分确定自己的定位,总而言之,并不十分出众。

Pros

+ 明亮的 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏
+ 流畅的日常性能
+ 通过 microSD 扩展存储
+ 音频接口

Cons

- 只有 WiFi 5
- 性能储备低
- 显示屏边缘出现输入错误
- 语音质量一般

价格和供应情况

在进行评测时,小米只销售Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 的一种配置,即 8 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间。这款设备在英国的零售价为 300 英镑。不过,在评测时,市场价格已经低了 100 英镑之多。

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
75.3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $287.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
2. $7.99
zZjoOoj For Xiaomi Redmi Not...
3. $10.99
zZjoOoj for Xiaomi Redmi Not...
List Price: 350€
180 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED
2.
85.9% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $6.99
Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design...
2. $5.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector C...
3. $3.99
Dretal for Samsung Galaxy A3...
List Price: 379€
209 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"
2340x1080
390 PPI
Super AMOLED
3.
80.9%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP7 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $8.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P...
2. $7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P...
3. $9.99
zZjoOoj For Xiaomi Poco X7 P...
List Price: 430€
198 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED
4.
86.9% v7 (old)
Nothing Phone (2a)
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 ⎘
ARM Mali-G610 MP4 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $5.99
Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design...
3. $7.99
JETech Screen Protector for ...
List Price: 329€
190 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2412x1084
394 PPI
AMOLED
5.
82.5% v7 (old)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $287.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
2. $249.99
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G ...
3. $334.99
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
List Price: 399€
188 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED

小米推出了整个Redmi Note 14 系列。本评论涉及Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE。从设计上看,与价格更低的非 Pro Note 14 相比,弧形显示屏和后置摄像头的不同设计引人注目。

主摄像头和自拍摄像头的像素也有所增加,更新的处理器应能确保更好的性能。不过,对于这个价位的制造商来说,提供缺乏 5G 支持的 Pro 机型并不常见。

小米在智能手机的产品页面上列出了不同的版本。入门级机型提供 8 GB 内存和 128 GB 存储空间。还有 256 GB 存储空间和 8 或 12 GB 内存的机型。最大的型号有 512 GB 存储空间和 12 GB 内存。不过,销售页面上只列出了 8 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间的组合,这也是我们的评测机型。

有三种颜色可供选择:极光紫、午夜黑和海洋蓝。我们的评测机型为黑色。

规格

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (Redmi Note 14 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G100 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 229 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3,5 mm, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic compass, Gyroscope, OTG, IR-Blaster, FM-Radio
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (GSM: 850/ 900/ 1800/ 1900MHz); 3G (WCDMA: 1/ 2/ 4/ 5/ 8); 4G (LTE FDD:1/ 2/ 3/ 4/ 5/ 7/ 8/ 12/ 13/ 17/ 20/ 26/ 28/ 66; LTE TDD: 38/ 40/ 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.24 x 162.16 x 74.92
Battery
5500 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 200 MPix OIS, f/1.65, 1/1,4" sensor-size; 8 MPix ultrawide, f/2.2; 2 MPix macro, f/2.4
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.2
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: onscreen, Case, USB-Cable, HyperOS 1.0, 12 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1), Beidou (B1l), SBAS; HDR10, HLG; Camera2API Level 3; Bluetooth Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+LHDC V1/ V2/ V3/ V4/ V5; SAR-Head: 0.8 W/kg, SAR-Body 0.98 W/kg; IP64, fanless
Weight
180 g, Power Supply: 108 g
Price
350 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - Note 14 Pro 采用曲面显示屏

Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 非常适合手持。圆润的背面让人感觉比实际窄。制造质量良好,按键稳固到位,缝隙小而均匀。后置摄像头的凸起相当突出,但它的位置使智能手机放在桌子上时几乎不会晃动。

闪亮的铝合金边框可以清晰地看到指纹和灰尘,相机镜头之间的区域也会聚集灰尘。略微发亮的塑料后壳听起来有些空洞,但智能手机非常稳定,即使用力也很难扭转。

Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 拥有 IP64 认证,显示屏由康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 保护。

Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 颜色款式。图片来源:Xiaomi小米
Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 颜色款式。图片来源:Xiaomi小米
图片来源:Benedikt WinkelBenedikt Winkel
图片来源:Benedikt WinkelBenedikt Winkel
图片来源:Benedikt WinkelBenedikt Winkel
图片来源:Benedikt WinkelBenedikt Winkel
图片来源:Benedikt WinkelBenedikt Winkel
图片来源:Benedikt WinkelBenedikt Winkel
图片来源:Benedikt WinkelBenedikt Winkel
图片来源:Benedikt WinkelBenedikt Winkel
图片来源:Benedikt WinkelBenedikt Winkel

尺寸比较

162.16 mm 74.92 mm 8.24 mm 180 g161.74 mm 76.32 mm 8.55 mm 190 g161.7 mm 78 mm 8.2 mm 209 g160.75 mm 75.24 mm 8.43 mm 198 g161.1 mm 75 mm 8 mm 188 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - 小米配备了音频插孔和 microSD

Redmi Note 14 Pro 配备了 3.5 毫米音频插孔、红外爆破器和可使用 microSD 卡扩展的内存。遗憾的是,USB-C 端口仍然是我们熟悉的样子,它只支持 USB 2.0 标准。不过,它至少支持 exFAT 和 NTFS 文件系统。

结合三星 980 Pro 固态硬盘,我们的平均传输速度达到了 26.17 MB/s。Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 还配备了立体声扬声器,并通过了杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos)认证。

microSD 读卡器

Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 的内存最多可使用 1 TB 的 microSD 卡进行扩展,该卡可插入混合插槽。在测试中,我们使用了参考卡 AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60。

使用该卡,我们获得了 25.51 MB/s 的平均传输速度。这使得Redmi Note 14 Pro 的速度明显低于
其前身小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 智能手机评测--配备 AMOLED 显示屏和出色摄像头的中端手机 三星Galaxy A35 的传输速度是它的两倍。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
55.32 MB/s +117%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)
36.3 MB/s +42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=77, last 2 years)
30.1 MB/s +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
25.51 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø27.3 (19.5-31.2)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.5 (26.8-45.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø40.3 (26.8-45.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.5 (46.2-79.8)

软件 -Redmi Note 拥有 HyperOS 和缩短的更新计划

开箱后,小米Redmi Note 14 Pro 预装了Android 14,使用 HyperOS 1.0 作为界面。除了小米和谷歌应用程序外,还安装了许多第三方程序。不过,这些程序都可以轻松卸载。

HyperOS 提供了大量自定义选项,但某些应用程序中的广告令人讨厌,尤其是在下载过程中。小米的更新政策不透明,Note 14 Pro LTE 接收更新的时间比 Note 14 LTE.制造商承诺提供三年的操作系统更新和四年的安全更新。在本次评测时,安全补丁是从 2024 年 12 月开始的。

可持续发展 - 小米注重长远发展

小米没有提供有关Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 碳足迹的任何信息。包装基本不使用塑料,但也并非完全不使用塑料。毕竟,这款智能手机要特别稳定,因此也要特别耐用。小米希望通过加强边角和内部吸震泡沫来实现这一目标。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 仅配备 WiFi 5。

Redmi Note 14 Pro 仅支持 WiFi 5。因此,与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 结合使用时,传输速度低于对比设备。与前代产品相比,数据接收速度略有提高。

在我们的测试中,连接非常稳定。与Redmi Note 14 LTE 测试不同的是,我们在 Pro 机型上也没有遇到突然掉线的情况。顾名思义,Note 14 Pro LTE 不带 5G 连接。LTE 连接快速可靠,覆盖的频段比便宜的 Note 14 LTE型号覆盖的频段更多。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
965 (877min - 991max) MBit/s +162%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
834 (780min - 913max) MBit/s +127%
Average of class Smartphone
  (49.8 - 1806, n=185, last 2 years)
719 MBit/s +95%
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
680 (417min - 860max) MBit/s +85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
368 (360min - 375max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
358 (332min - 368max) MBit/s -3%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (10.5 - 718, n=194)
350 MBit/s -5%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
899 (822min - 924max) MBit/s +138%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
830 (758min - 851max) MBit/s +120%
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
782 (633min - 873max) MBit/s +107%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52 - 1857, n=183, last 2 years)
701 MBit/s +86%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
377 (336min - 380max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (20.1 - 695, n=193)
329 MBit/s -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
290 (240min - 317max) MBit/s -23%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (521 - 1945, n=78, last 2 years)
1431 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
872 (464min - 957max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (451 - 1864, n=78, last 2 years)
1362 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
914 (902min - 925max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø368 (360-375)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (332-368)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (336-380)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø290 (240-317)
全球导航卫星系统测量:室内
全球导航卫星系统测量:室内
全球导航卫星系统测量:户外
全球导航卫星系统测量:户外

小米Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 支持所有常见的卫星系统,但只使用一个频段。使用 Garmin Venu 2 参考设备漫步时发现,定位并不是特别精确。记录的路线经常偏离地图路径。不过,在日常生活中,例如使用谷歌地图导航,就不成问题了。

全球导航卫星系统测量:池塘
全球导航卫星系统测量:池塘
全球导航卫星系统测量:路径
全球导航卫星系统测量:路径
全球导航卫星系统测量:摘要
全球导航卫星系统测量:摘要

电话功能和语音质量 -Redmi Note 14 Pro 和尖锐的声音

Redmi Note 14 Pro 的通话质量令人失望--至少对电话另一端的人来说是这样。来电者的声音清晰响亮。然而,红米用户的声音却显得尖锐、低沉,而且有些不连贯。声音听起来就像一直在使用免提功能。降噪功能也可以做得更好。

小米公司使用谷歌公司的软件,应用程序清晰易懂。

摄像头 - 红米相机的 200 万像素像素未达到预期水平

与Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 自拍。图片来源:Benedikt WinkelBenedikt Winkel
与Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 自拍。图片来源:Benedikt WinkelBenedikt Winkel

在广告中,小米强调了Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 的摄像头质量。据说,由于采用了人工智能优化算法,拍摄的照片动态效果特别好,但测试照片的锐度有所欠缺,色彩也比较暗淡。数码变焦在 5 倍放大时也能使用,但细节有点模糊。总的来说,图像没有达到我们的预期。

在光线不足的条件下拍摄的照片效果不错,但图像噪点较多。超广角摄像头的成像质量低于主摄像头。3200 万像素的自拍摄像头能拍出清晰的照片,但容易出现镜头眩光。Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 的 200 MPix 模式可拍摄全分辨率图像,专业模式可进行手动设置。

这款智能手机的视频质量不错,由于采用了 OIS,拍摄时可以保持稳定。此外,自动对焦和曝光调整工作可靠、快速。视频录制最高可达 1080p,主摄像头可达到 60 fps,但其他镜头只能达到 30 fps。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

RabbitPondUltra-Wide-Angle5x ZoomLow Light
ColorChecker
8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
15 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
11 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE: 6.34 ∆E min: 1.13 - max: 14.97 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
54.9 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
61.6 ∆E
53.5 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
29 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
76 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
92 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE: 46.67 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 92.05 ∆E

配件和保修 - 红米手机配有屏幕保护膜和小米贴心服务。

Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 采用各种形式的零售包装盒。包装中还包括一个 45 瓦的电源适配器,但在德国并不随附。出厂时,显示屏上贴有贴合良好的保护膜,在测试期间没有脱落。制造商还随设备附送了一个柔软、贴合的保护套。

在德国,小米手机享有 12 个月的保修服务,但 24 个月的保修服务不受影响。制造商在德国为Redmi Note 14 Pro 提供 "小米关怀 "计划。基本套餐价格为 24 欧元(约合 25 美元),每个保险年涵盖两例损坏,即使是由用户造成的损坏。此外,44 欧元(约合 46 美元)还可以为设备投保失窃险。

在德国,Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 不带充电器。图片来源:Benedikt WinkelBenedikt Winkel
在德国,Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 不带充电器。图片来源:Benedikt WinkelBenedikt Winkel

输入设备和操作 - 红米 Pro 显示屏上的输入错误

小米在其Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 中使用了曲面显示屏。尽管贴有保护膜,但轻扫手势感觉良好。不过,保护膜的两端在弧形边缘很明显。在我们的测试中,并非所有的输入都能在显示屏的弧面上识别。

开箱即用的默认键盘是谷歌的 Gboard,输入非常简单,基本不会出错。我们喜欢安静的线性振动电机。解锁可通过显示屏下方的光学指纹识别器和 2D 面部解锁实现。这两种解锁方式都非常快速可靠。

显示屏 - Note 14 Pro LTE 具有良好的亮度和高频 PWM

子像素图像
子像素图像

Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 采用长宽比为 20:9 的 6.67 英寸 AMOLED 面板。显示屏的最大刷新率为 120 Hz,根据 DRM 信息,中间有 30、60 和 90 Hz 三档。软件出厂设置会根据内容自动调整刷新率。

在环境光传感器激活的情况下,我们测得的最大亮度为 1,356 cd/m²,这意味着红米的亮度明显高于对比设备。在日常生活中,亮度分布的变化并不明显。在没有亮度传感器的情况下,Note 14 Pro 的最高亮度为 488 尼特。在使用 HDR 和 APL18 内容时,显示屏会变得更亮,我们在 APL18 测试中测得的亮度为 1,654 尼特,在使用 HDR 内容时测得的亮度为 1,715 cd/m²。

我们的测量证实了在两种不同频率下观察到的屏幕闪烁现象。基本的 120 Hz 闪烁和 1666 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光。根据制造商的说法,PWM 调光频率应高达 1920 赫兹。

在我们的测试中,永久调节的环境光传感器令人讨厌。特别是在建筑物中,智能手机会不断上下切换亮度,在过亮或过暗的亮度水平之间波动。

1265
cd/m²
1287
cd/m²
1347
cd/m²
1264
cd/m²
1298
cd/m²
1356
cd/m²
1263
cd/m²
1287
cd/m²
1356
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1356 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1302.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.02 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1298 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Nothing Phone (2a)
AMOLED, 2412x1084, 6.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
-3%
18%
13%
3%
Brightness middle
1298
904
-30%
1034
-20%
1033
-20%
994
-23%
Brightness
1303
912
-30%
1041
-20%
1042
-20%
979
-25%
Brightness Distribution
93
97
4%
97
4%
96
3%
95
2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.8
2.1
-17%
1
44%
1.6
11%
1.36
24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.5
2.8
49%
2.2
60%
2.5
55%
3.61
34%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
2.2
4%
1.4
39%
1.2
48%
2.2
4%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.1 105%
2.22 99%
2.07 106%
2.287 96%
CCT
6104 106%
6478 100%
6553 99%
6482 100%
6392 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 15.96 %
Secondary Frequency: 1666 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8600 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

使用固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅曲线放大版可在信息框中查看)。

在色彩还原方面,Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 不得不向对比设备认输。尤其是红色色调,饱和度过高。根据 Calman 2D 测量,sRGB 色彩空间的覆盖率为 99.7%。

色彩精度(自然显示模式,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩精度(自然显示模式,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩空间(显示模式自然,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩空间(显示模式自然,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
灰度(显示模式自然,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
灰度(显示模式自然,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩饱和度(自然显示模式,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩饱和度(自然显示模式,目标色彩空间 sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.894 ms rise
↘ 0.737 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.06 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.02 ms rise
↘ 1.036 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms).

Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 的可视角度令人印象深刻。即使从广角也能轻松看到内容,而且没有任何色彩偏差。在户外使用时,这款智能手机在阳光下也清晰可读。从侧面观看时,我们希望看到更高的亮度。

性能--Note 14 Pro LTE 配备了 Helio G100,但性能有待提高

基准测试结果令人惊喜。Redmi Note 14 Pro 配备了 联发科 Helio G100取得了与去年的 Redmi Note 13 Pro联发科 Helio G99.不过,在 Geekbench 和 Antutu 基准测试中,对比设备的表现各有千秋,尤其是 Poco X7 ProDimensity 8400.

不过,在日常情况下,Redmi Note 14 Pro 的运行要比 Poco X7 Pro 流畅得多。 Redmi Note 14 LTE相比,同样使用 Helio G99.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1598 Points +120%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=187, last 2 years)
1499 Points +107%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1128 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1017 Points +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
731 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
725 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  ()
725 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
6239 Points +225%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=187, last 2 years)
4240 Points +121%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2906 Points +51%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2592 Points +35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
2000 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1922 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  ()
1922 Points 0%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1160 Points +113%
Average of class Smartphone
  (139 - 2437, n=169, last 2 years)
1063 Points +95%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
890 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
783 Points +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
558 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
545 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  ()
545 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
5284 Points +202%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 8816, n=169, last 2 years)
3567 Points +104%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2778 Points +59%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2177 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1922 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1749 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  ()
1749 Points 0%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1695493 Points +286%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=123, last 2 years)
1302998 Points +197%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
693939 Points +58%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
602612 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
439283 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  ()
439283 Points 0%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
14805 Points +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=193, last 2 years)
13526 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
13430 Points +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
10933 Points +2%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10924 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10723 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  ()
10723 Points 0%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1287 Points +122%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=165, last 2 years)
946 Points +63%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
695 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
647 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
581 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  ()
581 Points 0%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
8278 Points +180%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 13729, n=159, last 2 years)
6566 Points +122%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4416 Points +49%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4115 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2960 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  ()
2960 Points 0%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 19891, n=159, last 2 years)
10376 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
8843 Points +42%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
8761 Points +40%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
6734 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6238 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  ()
6238 Points 0%
Memory
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
8484 Points +143%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=159, last 2 years)
7164 Points +105%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4567 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4301 Points +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3493 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  ()
3493 Points 0%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
36491 Points +1187%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=159, last 2 years)
18524 Points +553%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10646 Points +275%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
7040 Points +148%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2836 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  ()
2836 Points 0%
Web
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1731 Points +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=159, last 2 years)
1587 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1421 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1243 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  ()
1243 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
876 Points -30%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
49010 Points +452%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
26315 Points +196%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
18038 Points +103%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8882 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  ()
8882 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
5987 Points -33%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
29244 Points +3386%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=141, last 2 years)
27381 Points +3164%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
11407 Points +1260%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
839 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  ()
839 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
545 Points -35%

在 GPU 方面,小米选择使用与前代产品相同的硬件 以及更便宜的以及更便宜的 Redmi Note 14 LTE - 的 Mali-G57 MP2图形芯片。这意味着小米智能手机在与竞争设备的较量中毫无胜算,在各项基准测试中均名列倒数第一。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3691 Points +1005%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1156 Points +246%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
796 Points +138%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
334 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
334 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3840 Points +1016%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1153 Points +235%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
809 Points +135%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
344 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
342 Points -1%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12261 Points +901%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4259 Points +248%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2796 Points +128%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1225 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1223 Points 0%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4140 Points +235%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2820 Points +128%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1237 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1214 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6358 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6277 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1333 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1272 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6996 Points +91%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4391 Points +20%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4006 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3668 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3628 Points -1%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20018 Points +724%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6935 Points +186%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5118 Points +111%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2438 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2428 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14161 Points +439%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5966 Points +127%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4936 Points +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2630 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2625 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +126%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +77%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
53 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
568 fps +802%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
159 fps +152%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
118 fps +87%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +243%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps +94%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
243 fps +508%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +145%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps +98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +417%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +148%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +104%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
199 fps +1227%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +347%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps +247%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps +658%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +183%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +108%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
122 fps +713%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps +167%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
73 fps +780%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +298%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +141%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.2 fps +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.3 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps +1009%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps +282%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +136%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
108 fps +800%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps +300%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +150%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps +993%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +279%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +143%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28 fps +1067%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps +292%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps +142%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.6 fps +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.4 fps
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
139.947 Points +81%
Average of class Smartphone (111.1 - 387, n=170, last 2 years)
128.4 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
115.153 Points +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (chrome 132)
77.2 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100 ()
77.2 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
76.624 Points -1%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
192 runs/min +178%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=149, last 2 years)
153.5 runs/min +122%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
104 runs/min +51%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
104 runs/min +51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (chrome 132)
69.1 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G100 ()
69.1 runs/min 0%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=83, last 2 years)
12.2 runs/min +135%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
11.7 runs/min +125%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
6.62 runs/min +27%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
5.81 runs/min +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (chrome 132)
5.2 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G100 ()
5.2 runs/min 0%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
144 Points +73%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
125 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
123 Points +48%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
121.6 Points +47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (chrome 132)
83 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100 ()
83 Points 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
47146 Points +100%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=207, last 2 years)
40359 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
36010 Points +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (chrome 132)
23522 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100 ()
23522 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G (Chrome 123)
20319 Points -14%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
18562 Points -21%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Mediatek Helio G100 ()
1775 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (chrome 132)
1774.6 ms *
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
1569.6 ms * +12%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1478 ms * +17%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
1099 ms * +38%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
882.5 ms * +50%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTESamsung Galaxy A35 5GXiaomi Poco X7 ProNothing Phone (2a)Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4GAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-42%
110%
25%
4%
1%
72%
Sequential Read 256KB
933
529.32
-43%
3969.01
325%
1028.37
10%
933.8
0%
Sequential Write 256KB
798
270
-66%
1813.29
127%
952
19%
795.4
0%
721 ?(369 - 913, n=39)
-10%
Random Read 4KB
218
244.24
12%
362.61
66%
273.19
25%
246.8
13%
Random Write 4KB
215
62.59
-71%
49.17
-77%
311.8
45%
222.2
3%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 24.4.0h: Ø57.4 (44-60)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 24.4.0h: Ø54.3 (40-60)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø32.2 (13-60)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø29.8 (3-60)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.6.0: Ø39.8 (34-41)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.6.0: Ø29.9 (24-31)

排放 - Note 14 Pro LTE 配备杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos

温度 -Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 始终保持低温

Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 无论是在日常生活中还是在玩游戏或看电影时,都能保持舒适的温度。在 "Burnout "基准测试的极端负载下,我们记录到设备顶部的最高温度为 37.8 摄氏度。而在底部,最高温度仅为 35 摄氏度。

在压力测试中,Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 非常稳定,几乎没有任何跳动。Steel Nomad 压力测试被该设备中止。

Max. Load
 37.8 °C37.1 °C33.9 °C 
 37.6 °C36.5 °C33.4 °C 
 35.7 °C35.7 °C33.9 °C 
Maximum: 37.8 °C
Average: 35.7 °C
33.1 °C34.9 °C35 °C
32.5 °C34.9 °C34.8 °C
31.6 °C33.7 °C34 °C
Maximum: 35 °C
Average: 33.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 %
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.4 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.8 % -2%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54 % -46%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.9 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.9 % -44%
05101520Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.08 (2.07-2.09)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.83 (4.82-4.84)
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.89 (6.88-6.91)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.44 (7.42-7.45)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.7 (16.6-17)
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.7 (24.6-24.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.33 (7.31-7.34)

扬声器 - 小米提供立体声和音频插孔

Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 配备了立体声扬声器,并通过了杜比全景声认证。声音在设备顶部通过听筒向前方和通过边框上的开口向上方发出。

与前代产品相比,中音均衡,这是一个明显的改进。而低音或低频则没有。此外,在音量较大时,后部振动明显。

Redmi Note 14 Pro 有一个耳机插孔。测得的信噪比为 74.09 dBFS,属于中等水平。在我们的测试中,这款智能手机可以轻松连接各种蓝牙耳机。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203334.82527.527.63122.823.64026.330.45036.439.46321.1238020.717.310019.621.612512.632.116016.34520016.34425013.150.331512.454.84001056.550010.862.863012.466.880011.969.8100011.677.1125012.477.6160011.674.6200011.374.9250011.972.7315012.174.4400013.174.8500013.174.9630013.776.7800013.3731000013.673.91250013.7691600014.266.1SPL24.686.4N0.667median 12.6median 69.8Delta1.19.842.23833.233.527.126.530.528.43431.425.823.41717.919.922.225.427.317.334.910.639.714.447.58.149.97.450.77.860.4961.112.561.417.273.49.4731072.69.867.810.362.31162.31265.912.670.913.572.714.46815.271.315.971.816.851.524.881.60.648.4median 12.5median 62.33.211.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTEXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - Note 14 Pro LTE 充电迅速

功耗 - 红米手机经济实惠

Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 的低级计算能力主要体现在智能手机的低能耗上。不过,该设备并非在每个领域都是佼佼者。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.15 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.13 / 1.21 / 1.25 Watt
Load midlight 5.35 / 7.25 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
5500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
6000 mAh
Nothing Phone (2a)
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G100
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-34%
-24%
-18%
0%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
1.13
0.89
21%
1.07
5%
0.81
28%
1.13 ?()
-0%
Idle Average *
1.21
1.99
-64%
1.29
-7%
2.01
-66%
1.21 ?()
-0%
Idle Maximum *
1.25
2.14
-71%
1.36
-9%
2.07
-66%
1.25 ?()
-0%
Load Average *
5.35
4.57
15%
6.14
-15%
4.16
22%
5.35 ?()
-0%
Load Maximum *
7.25
12.31
-70%
13.94
-92%
7.91
-9%
7.25 ?()
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mediatek Helio G100; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.61 (0.919-5.19)
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.58 (0.875-6.87)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mediatek Helio G100; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.996 (0.882-1.459)
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.058 (0.954-1.125)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.21.41.61.82.12.32.52.833.23.53.73.94.24.4Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mediatek Helio G100; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.27 (1.85-2.62)
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.26 (3.93-4.62)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mediatek Helio G100; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.996 (0.882-1.459)
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.058 (0.954-1.125)

电池续航时间 - Note 14 Pro LTE 表现一般

在现实的 WiFi 网上冲浪测试中,Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 的运行时间达到了 17 小时,超过了 Note 13 Pro 4G。 Note 13 Pro 4G不过,14 Pro LTE 的电池容量为 5,500 毫安时,比 Note 13 Pro 4G 大 10%。

手机 Nothing Phone 2a采用了更强大的处理器,在容量为 5,000 mAh 的情况下,几乎可以达到相同的续航时间。在日常生活中,只要不玩游戏或观看长时间视频,就可以使用两天而无需充电。

Note 14 Pro LTE 的最大充电功率为 45 瓦,不支持无线充电。这款智能手机从 1% 充至 60% 需要 35 分钟,从 1% 充至 100% 需要 75 分钟。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
17h 02min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
5500 mAh
1022 min
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh
902 min
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
6000 mAh
1183 min
Nothing Phone (2a)
5000 mAh
1011 min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
5000 mAh
969 min

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 有一个问题:它几乎不比便宜得多的 Note 14 LTE 好多少,也不比配置更好的 Note 14 Pro 5G 便宜多少。在性能方面,这款智能手机被这个价位的同类设备甩在了后面。

相机性能还不错,但没有达到我们的预期。明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏和均衡的扬声器给人留下了积极的印象。Note 14 Pro LTE 还配备了 NFC、内存扩展和音频插孔。不过,就其性能而言,该设备的价格过于昂贵。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE - 02/21/2025 v8
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
43 / 69 → 62%
Weight
90%
Battery
91%
Display
90%
Games Performance
5 / 55 → 9%
Application Performance
54 / 85 → 63%
AI Performance
5%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
69%
Average
58%
75%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
97%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
61.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 45.6%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 智能手机评测--这已经是 Pro 吗?
Benedikt Winkel, 2025-02-25 (Update: 2025-02-25)