Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

微软 Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake 评测--ARM 架构 Windows 系统的一记耳光

配备英特尔处理器的 Surface 笔记本电脑性能更佳。

去年，微软将其 Surface 设备完全换成了高通公司的 ARM 处理器。不过，企业客户似乎并不想要这些设备，因为 Surface Laptop 15 for Business 现在已经采用了英特尔的 Lunar Lake 处理器。这样做的结果在很多方面都更好。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
ARM AI Laptop / Notebook Lunar Lake MS Surface Thunderbolt Touchscreen Wi-Fi 7 Windows

结论 - Surface Laptop 7 15 配备英特尔月亮湖处理器更出色

新款 Surface Laptop 7 15 for Business 配备了英特尔处理器，与骁龙处理器相比在很多方面都有优势。其中当然包括更好的软件兼容性，但令人惊讶的是电池续航时间也得到了改善。此外，企业用户似乎并不想要骁龙笔记本电脑，而且一般来说，英特尔处理器的笔记本电脑在整体配置上更胜一筹。这对 Windows on ARM 来说无疑是一记沉重的耳光，尤其是考虑到微软正在大力推广 ARM 机型。

虽然 Lunar Lake 处理器的多核 CPU 性能较低，但在单核情况下却不相上下，而且还配备了更快的集成显卡和 Thunderbolt 4。它的 IPS 屏幕拥有高亮度和非常准确的色彩配置文件。

这两款机型仍然存在的一个缺点是在负载情况下表面温度较高，因此在这方面需要第二个风扇。特别是 15 英寸机型，其机箱内仍有相当多的空余空间，因此这在技术上应该不成问题。另外值得一提的是，英特尔版本的风扇在高负载时声音会变大，这几乎是与 ARM 型号相比唯一的主要缺点。

最后是价格问题，英特尔机型比其 MRSP 贵 500 美元左右。不过，ARM 机型通常会大幅打折，目前微软提供的配置 32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD 的 Snapdragon 机型售价约为 1599.99 美元，比英特尔机型低了 1000 美元。当然，这种差异很难说得通。

Pros

+ 优质稳定的机箱
+ 良好的系统性能
+ 运行时间优于 ARM 机型
+ 舒适的输入设备
+ 出色的色彩配置文件
+ 日常使用非常安静
+ 改进的维护选项/访问

Cons

- 高负载时风扇声音更大
- 内存无法升级
- 键盘在负载情况下会明显发热
- 没有 WWAN 模块

价格和供应情况

您可以直接从微软购买配备英特尔处理器的 Surface Laptop 7 15 for Business 的各种配置。我们的配置目前售价为 2599.99 美元。.

Table of Contents

  1. 结论 - Surface Laptop 7 15 配备英特尔月亮湖处理器更出色
  2. 规格
  3. 与骁龙机型的区别
  4. 输入设备 - 触觉触摸板
  5. 显示屏 - IPS，600 尼特，120 赫兹
  6. 性能 - 配备 32GB 内存的 Lunar Lake 处理器
  7. 排放与能源
  8. Notebookcheck 总评分
  9. Possible alternatives compared

继去年微软独家推出搭载高通骁龙处理器的当前第七代 Surface 笔记本电脑之后，后缀为 "for Business "的机型现在也开始搭载英特尔处理器。今天，我们测试的是搭载酷睿至尊 7 268V、32GB 内存、1TB 固态硬盘和我们熟悉的 IPS 触摸屏的 15 英寸机型，MRSP 为 2599.99 美元。当然，我们尤其感兴趣的是与 ARM 版本我们几周前刚刚对其进行了详细测试。

规格

Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake (Surface Laptop Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V 8 x 2.2 - 5 GHz, 37 W PL2 / Short Burst, 30 W PL1 / Sustained, Lunar Lake
Graphics adapter
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 32.0.101.6647
Memory
32 GB 
, LPDDR5x-8533, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
15.00 inch 3:2, 2496 x 1664 pixel 200 PPI, capacitive, LQ150P1JX61, IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB, 1024 GB 
, 899 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Lunar Lake SOC - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel BE201 320MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18.3 x 329 x 239
Battery
64 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65W PSU, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.66 kg, Power Supply: 253 g
Price
2760 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

与骁龙机型的区别

Surface Laptop 7 15 配备英特尔 Lunar Lake 处理器的情况与 骁龙版.包括铂金和黑色两种颜色。我们注意到没有质量问题，但笔记本的深色铝表面容易留下指纹痕迹。一个积极的方面是组件很容易接触，因为橡胶脚垫下只有四颗 T5 螺钉，底板由磁铁固定，所以没有恼人的夹子。如有必要，M.2-2242 固态硬盘和电池都可以更换，风扇也可以清洁。

英特尔型号也是 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑，但它的两个 USB-C 端口现在支持 Thunderbolt 4。微软本可以安装更多连接，如额外的 USB-C 端口或 HDMI 输出，尤其是在 15 英寸机型上。它的 Wi-Fi 模块还支持 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 5.4，但没有 5G 模块。它的 2 百万像素网络摄像头也没有机械快门，microSD 读卡器（弹簧机构）速度一般。15 英寸机型可选配智能卡读卡器。

尺寸比较

❌
352.6 mm 226.9 mm 15.9 mm 1.4 kg340 mm 228.5 mm 17.7 mm 1.4 kg343.8 mm 235.4 mm 13.9 mm 1.5 kg340.4 mm 237.6 mm 11.5 mm 1.5 kg329 mm 239 mm 18.3 mm 1.7 kg329 mm 237 mm 18.29 mm 1.7 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
左：3.5 毫米音频、USB-A 3.2 Gen 1（5 Gbit/s）、2x USB-C 4.0（带 Thunderbolt 4，40 Gbit/s）、DisplayPort ALT Mode 2.1、Power Delivery 3.0
左：3.5 毫米音频、USB-A 3.2 Gen 1（5 Gbit/s）、2x USB-C 4.0（带 Thunderbolt 4，40 Gbit/s）、DisplayPort ALT Mode 2.1、Power Delivery 3.0
右：microSD 读卡器、Surface Connect 接口
右：microSD 读卡器、Surface Connect 接口
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
86.2 MB/s
Average of class Office
  (22.7 - 198.5, n=34, last 2 years)
56.8 MB/s -34%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
50.9 MB/s -41%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
28.6 MB/s -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
90.6 MB/s +2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
88.5 MB/s
Average of class Office
  (25 - 249, n=30, last 2 years)
73.6 MB/s -17%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
37.7 MB/s -57%
Networking
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Intel BE201 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1640 (min: 1449) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1562 (min: 1469) MBit/s ∼90%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1762 (min: 1689) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1618 (min: 1588) MBit/s ∼93%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel BE201 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1656 (min: 1540) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1568 (min: 1525) MBit/s ∼90%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1243 (min: 1139) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1602 (min: 1438) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1029 (min: 963) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1656 (min: 836) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Intel BE201 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1280 (min: 1203) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1405 (min: 1272) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1516 (min: 1367) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1613 (min: 1567) MBit/s ∼97%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm FastConnect 7800
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1595 (min: 1475) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1740 (min: 1673) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1640 (1449-1710)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1562 (1469-1610)
ColorChecker
12.4 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
10 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake: 10.78 ∆E min: 1.61 - max: 19.36 ∆E

输入设备 - 触觉触摸板

其背光键盘与 ARM 型号总的来说，即使在撰写较长的文字时，使用起来也很舒适。不过 ThinkPad X9在这方面的表现更为出色。在我们的测试中，测试设备的触觉触摸板工作得非常好，表面光滑，按压点安静。笔记本电脑的电容式触摸屏也可用于输入。

输入设备
输入设备
背光键盘
背光键盘

显示屏 - IPS，600 尼特，120 赫兹

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
全亮度时背光出血极少
全亮度时背光出血极少

该笔记本电脑的 IPS 触摸屏一般都具有色彩鲜艳、频率为 120 Hz 和 3:2 宽高比的良好画质，这对生产活动特别有帮助。此外，即使在显示明亮的内容时，画面也不会出现颗粒感。与 OLED 屏幕相比，它也不会出现 PWM 闪烁。此外，它的亮度很高，略低于 600 cd/m²，但黑阶略高，这也是它与 OLED 面板相比的缺点。IPS 面板的黑度和对比度都比较弱。该面板的分辨率（2,496 x 1,664 像素）尚可，响应时间也不突出，但仍有一些背光出血现象。其亮度和色温均可通过传感器自动调节。尽管亮度很高，但也不会出现光晕问题。支持 HDR 内容，但显示器的最大亮度仍保持在约 600 cd/m² 不变。

对于开箱即用的出色校准，我们没有任何负面意见。我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析，Vivid 配置文件（P3 参考空间）和 sRGB 配置文件的色彩偏差都非常小。这使得 Surface Laptop 7 15 适合图像/视频编辑。

597
cd/m²		607
cd/m²		595
cd/m²
604
cd/m²		599
cd/m²		592
cd/m²
580
cd/m²		568
cd/m²		566
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LQ150P1JX61 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 607 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 589.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 599 cd/m²
Contrast: 1498:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88
ΔE Greyscale 0.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
87.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
LQ150P1JX61, IPS, 2496x1664, 15", 120 Hz		Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3", 60 Hz		Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
ATNA53JB01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 Hz		Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Sharp LQ150P1JX61, IPS, 2496x1664, 15", 120 Hz		Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
CSOT T3 MNF307ZB1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 Hz		Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
ATNA56AC03-0, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6", 120 Hz
Display
1%
3%
0%
Display P3 Coverage
98.1
98.7
1%
100
2%
98.8
1%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
87.2
88.3
1%
94.6
8%
87.5
0%
Response Times
1%
97%
-70%
-2%
97%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
33.4 ?(12.5, 20.9)
33.2 ?(10.5, 12.7)
1%
1.46 ?(0.7, 0.76)
96%
44.4 ?(21.3, 23.1)
-33%
27 ?(13, 14)
19%
0.61 ?(0.3, 0.31)
98%
Response Time Black / White *
14.7 ?(5.5, 9.2)
14.7 ?(4.6, 10.1)
-0%
0.44 ?(0.24, 0.2)
97%
30.3 ?(15.9, 14.4)
-106%
17.9 ?(8.7, 9.2)
-22%
0.67 ?(0.34, 0.33)
95%
PWM Frequency
1200 ?(77)
240 ?(100)
Screen
-117%
365%
-46%
-123%
100%
Brightness middle
599
525
-12%
509
-15%
579.9
-3%
509
-15%
378
-37%
Brightness
590
513
-13%
508
-14%
576
-2%
479
-19%
379
-36%
Brightness Distribution
93
87
-6%
97
4%
92
-1%
90
-3%
98
5%
Black Level *
0.4
0.32
20%
0.01
97%
0.34
15%
0.32
20%
0.02
95%
Contrast
1498
1641
10%
50900
3298%
1706
14%
1591
6%
18900
1162%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.5
1.7
-240%
1.1
-120%
0.96
-92%
2.47
-394%
1
-100%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
0.9
4
-344%
2.5
-178%
2.39
-166%
4.73
-426%
2.6
-189%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
0.6
2.7
-350%
1.5
-150%
1.4
-133%
1.5
-150%
1.2
-100%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.2 100%
2.28 96%
2.13 103%
2.19 100%
2.19 100%
CCT
6543 99%
7010 93%
6294 103%
6407 101%
6790 96%
6460 101%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.06
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-38% / -72%
155% / 240%
-58% / -51%
-42% / -76%
99% / 99%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：Vivid，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：Vivid，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：Vivid，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：Vivid，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：Vivid，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：Vivid，目标色彩空间：P3）
CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
14.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.5 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.5 ms rise
↘ 20.9 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8529 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

户外活动
户外活动
在阳光下（明亮的一天，没有阳光直射）
在阳光下（明亮的一天，没有阳光直射）

虽然其闪亮的触摸屏在反光方面（尤其是在户外）表现不佳，但 Surface Laptop 在这方面的整体表现还是不错的。其视角稳定性也不错。

视角
视角

性能 - 配备 32GB 内存的 Lunar Lake 处理器

 
 
 

测试条件

与之前的 Surface Laptop 型号相比，Surface Laptop 7 15 for Business 的能耗曲线采用了常见的能耗模式（最佳能效、平衡、最佳性能）。我们使用最佳性能模式进行了以下基准测试和测量。

处理器

我们的测试配置使用的是带 vPro 的酷睿至尊 7 268V。Lunar Lake 芯片的纯多核性能不如竞争对手，但单核性能不错，只有Apple 的 M4 在这方面领先于所有竞争对手。总体而言，该机型的性能完全可以胜任大多数办公任务。在电池模式下，其性能保持不变，但在长时间负载情况下，其多核性能会下降约 13%。

Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core | Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
956 Points +59%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
926 Points +54%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z
874 Points +46%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V
630 Points +5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 268V, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB
600 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
574 Points -4%

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

01052103154205256307358409451050115512601365147015751680178518901995Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Ø1469 (1435.9-1615.7)
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Intel Core Ultra 7 258V: Ø1385 (1366.77-1570.23)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100: Ø1793 (1716.96-2082.03)
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100: Ø1920 (1854.94-1984.03)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
79.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
77.1 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
 
77 pt
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura -2!
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
76.8 pt
Average of class Office
 
69.1 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite -2!
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
65.6 pt
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
65.2 pt

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1616 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
164.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
287 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4129 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
736 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1910 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
10535 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
123.3 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
600 Points
Help
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V
87.7 pt
Average of class Office
 
85.3 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V
82.7 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
80.2 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
 
78 pt
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
68.8 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
67.3 pt

系统性能

不出所料，配备英特尔处理器的 Surface Laptop 7 15 是一款反应非常灵敏的设备，但与 ARM 机型不同的是，它与 x86 应用程序没有兼容性问题。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 268V, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB
7236 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
7023 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (6729 - 7236, n=2)
6983 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V
6771 Points -6%
Average of class Office
  (2463 - 7578, n=83, last 2 years)
5841 Points -19%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7236 points
Help
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V
108661 MB/s +1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V
107108 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V
104459 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
  (100445 - 107108, n=2)
103777 MB/s -3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
62268 MB/s -42%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
61071 MB/s -43%
Average of class Office
  (7158 - 108783, n=92, last 2 years)
53228 MB/s -50%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准延迟测试（上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的 Surface 笔记本电脑没有显示任何限制。虽然有一个驱动程序出现了偏差，但重要的 "中断到进程延迟 "值很低。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
1237.5 μs * -39%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 268V, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB
891.9 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的测试设备（M.2-2242）中安装了 1 TB 版本的三星 PM9C1A，首次启动笔记本电脑后可用容量为 899 GB。在我们的测试过程中，PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘的性能非常好，而且一直保持稳定。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 5987 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4397 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 445 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 645 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 63.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 137.8 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1097 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1493 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB
81.8 pt
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB
 
81.8 pt
Average of class Office
 
79.7 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
74.3 pt
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
 
67.9 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
67.1 pt
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
61.9 pt

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

03106209301240155018602170248027903100341037204030434046504960527055805890Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6146 (4937.32-6171.08)

图形卡

弧形图形 Arc Graphics 140V在基准测试中的速度明显快于 ARM 版本的 Adreno X1-85由于兼容性更好，英特尔型号更适合偶尔玩玩游戏。无论是在电池模式下还是在长时间负载情况下，图形处理器的性能都保持不变。

3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
12772 Points
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (10499 - 12772, n=18)
11269 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
11261 Points -12%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
10599 Points -17%
Average of class Office
  (1468 - 16418, n=88, last 2 years)
7442 Points -42%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
6363 Points -50%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
6352 Points -50%
3DMark 11 Performance
12919 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9375 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
4721 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
910 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
3555 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
3529 points
Help
Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU | v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | v3.3 Classroom METAL
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Office
  (245 - 3964, n=88, last 2 years)
699 Seconds * -26%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
593 Seconds * -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
584 Seconds * -5%
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V
  (509 - 700, n=17)
577 Seconds * -4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
555 Seconds *
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
545 Seconds * +2%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Intel Arc Graphics 140V, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
533 Seconds * +4%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple M4 10-core GPU, Apple M4 (10 cores)
405 Seconds * +27%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
Performance Rating - Percent
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
98.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
92.3 pt
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V
82.6 pt
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 -5!
Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU
80.4 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite -3!
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
63.3 pt
Average of class Office
 
58.1 pt
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon -1!
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
58 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

0510152025Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V: Ø26.8 (25-28)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 167.4 152.5 59.6 25.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 101.2 68.2 45.2 82.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 93.3 49.8 36.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 55.2 44.3 37.9
Strange Brigade (2018) 245 86.7 73.2 61.7
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 42.6 29.9 28.7 27.4
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 38.7 36.8 32.9 29.6

排放与能源

噪音排放

冷却装置
冷却装置

在日常使用中，Surface Laptop 7 15 是一款安静的设备，你通常只能听到细微的嘶嘶声。但在高负载情况下（如玩游戏或进行压力测试时），风扇的噪音会明显高于 ARM 机型--至少在最佳性能模式下--最高可达 41.9 dB(A)。这种噪音水平持续了几分钟。高频率也有点恼人，在这种情况下，使用两个风扇的散热解决方案肯定是更好的选择。在其他两种模式下，即平衡模式（最大 36.3 dB(A)）和最佳能效模式（最大 34.7 dB(A)），笔记本电脑的噪音要小得多。我们注意到测试设备没有发出其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle
23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A)
Load
31.8 / 41.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.9 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.443.739.14340.441.92533.73734.13530.834.63127.532.53031.430.433.54030.231.431.630.734.935.35028.327.329.82828.632.16326.428.32625.626.529.1803022.323.222.6212610023.620.821.221.918.824.812522.421.92221.918.624.11602219.71919.616.321.220023.622.220.521.81824.325024.623.225.121.118.728.83152624.821.820.615.525.540028.525.721.219.212.522.550029.925.621.119.811.324.663029.226.72219.611.424.280029.926.322.219.910.723.610002925.720.919.210.124.4125030.627.622.921.210.326.5160032.428.523.621.310.628.3200033.229.523.42110.926.7250031.827.620.81911.324.2315028.423.41716.111.421400028.422.816.216.611.918.9500028.722.617.719.312.218.8630026.42219.82112.121.2800028.724.915.618.412.119.11000024.716.514.717.712.2141250017.816.21619.912.213.91600015.917.317.12311.813.6SPL41.93832.831.823.936.1N3.92.81.71.60.52.3median 28.4median 23.4median 20.9median 19.9median 12.1median 24.1Delta3.22.72.41.12.13hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMicrosoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 268V, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB		Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z		Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00		Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ		Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V		Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
Noise
-5%
10%
1%
-1%
off / environment *
23.9
24.4
-2%
23.3
3%
23.2
3%
24.3
-2%
Idle Minimum *
23.9
24.4
-2%
23.3
3%
23.2
3%
24.3
-2%
Idle Average *
23.9
24.4
-2%
23.3
3%
23.2
3%
24.3
-2%
Idle Maximum *
23.9
24.4
-2%
23.3
3%
26.1
-9%
26.2
-10%
Load Average *
31.8
35.8
-13%
25.7
19%
30.9
3%
32.5
-2%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
38
39.4
-4%
31.1
18%
34.1
10%
35.2
7%
Load Maximum *
41.9
45
-7%
33.2
21%
44.3
-6%
39.8
5%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在空闲模式和低负载情况下，它的表面仍然保持良好的冷却状态，但在高负载情况下，机箱上部的温度会相对较高，这在打字时非常明显。这再次表明，第二个风扇将派上大用场。我们在机身底部测得的最高温度为 43 °C，因此即使在满载情况下，你也可以将笔记本电脑放在大腿上，而不会出现任何问题。在压力测试中，耗电量稳定在 25 瓦左右。

CPU/GPU 数据压力测试
CPU/GPU 数据压力测试
Max. Load
 41.4 °C45.7 °C44.4 °C 
 42.9 °C44.1 °C35.8 °C 
 31.6 °C29 °C31.5 °C 
Maximum: 45.7 °C
Average: 38.5 °C
42.9 °C42.9 °C39.8 °C
39.9 °C40.6 °C39.4 °C
32.6 °C33.4 °C32.7 °C
Maximum: 42.9 °C
Average: 38.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.4 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).
表面温度应力测试（顶部）
表面温度应力测试（顶部）
表面温度应力测试（底部）
表面温度应力测试（底部）
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V		Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU		Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V		Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS		Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V		Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Heat
-0%
2%
6%
-22%
-13%
Maximum Upper Side *
45.7
44.9
2%
42.1
8%
45.4
1%
46.2
-1%
43.6
5%
Maximum Bottom *
42.9
43.9
-2%
39.5
8%
37.2
13%
41
4%
53.1
-24%
Idle Upper Side *
23.6
23.4
1%
24.5
-4%
22.4
5%
34
-44%
26.7
-13%
Idle Bottom *
23.1
23.5
-2%
24.4
-6%
22
5%
33.8
-46%
27.2
-18%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.442.82530.834.23130.432.54034.935.75028.6336326.533.9802139.310018.84412518.650.916016.350.72001857.925018.761.231515.564.940012.562.750011.366.463011.467.280010.769.9100010.168.7125010.368.8160010.670.2200010.969.7250011.365.3315011.466400011.964.4500012.263.9630012.159.9800012.158.61000012.260.71250012.261.81600011.859.1SPL23.978.8N0.545.3median 12.1median 63.9Delta2.14.240.541.331.532.528.730.836.335.631.134.628.739.721.349.521.754.420.161.918.856.417.96419.56816.171.213.270.712.170.812.27011.36810.868.41172.611.17411.472.411.669.412.172.512.377.112.677.112.77612.876.91372.112.970.512.360.924.585.80.670median 12.6median 70.72.42.540.440.93140.530.138.233.538.732.137.534.539.323.94422.549.120.456.218.559.218.665.820.466.616.96913.167.611.768.811.175.810.480.51075.510.672.110.673.911.172.411.373.511.974.112.176.912.273.212.476.612.578.612.57812.975.212.164.724.487.50.678.2median 12.2median 73.52.94.631.428.331.424.322.524.319.720.819.722.42322.427.922.427.928.124.128.135.22235.24017.74046.518.246.553145356.813.956.862.414.262.464.516.464.565.113.165.169.311.269.367.310.367.366.210.166.270.19.570.170.79.370.771.29.471.270.29.770.267.810.167.87310.4736810.96867.511.567.561.211.961.262.412.162.465.612.565.665.312.165.360.412.560.48123.28151.30.551.3median 65.6median 11.9median 65.641.9433.63233.625.421.725.421.721.221.722.718.722.724.619.524.633.922.533.954.520.254.559.917.859.962.316.762.368.513.868.567.815.667.868.514.868.572.516.772.572.913.672.972.611.472.671.711.871.773.29.873.271.69.271.669.99.669.969.89.669.870.61070.675.310.375.373.110.873.169.211.269.271.111.371.166.411.466.468.511.768.568.911.768.970.411.570.467.21167.283.523.283.563.80.563.8median 69.9median 11.4median 69.92.21.82.236.242.428.534.227.53031.729.629.529.727.529.221.332.125.241.618.951.617.158.317.562.118.165.31563.612.562.911.364.711.969.310.771.810.769.110.767.410.864.911.167.511.865.112.167.412.463.312.569.212.767.112.969.413.271.91368.312.559.524.379.90.651median 12.5median 65.32.74.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMicrosoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar LakeApple MacBook Air 15 M4Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura EditionMicrosoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X EliteLenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 AuraAsus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

耗电量

65 瓦电源
65 瓦电源

空闲时，英特尔型号比 ARM 型号所需的能耗略高，但在满负荷情况下，两者的最大能耗都在 65 瓦左右。不过，在压力测试期间，这一数值稳定在 46 瓦左右，这就是为什么所提供的 65 瓦电源装置在尺寸上基本够用的原因。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.27 / 0.47 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.2 / 8.7 / 9 Watt
Load midlight 44.7 / 64.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB, IPS, 2496x1664, 15"		Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3"		Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3"		Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ, IPS, 2496x1664, 15"		Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, , IPS, 2880x1800, 15.3"		Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6"
Power Consumption
19%
23%
10%
-0%
10%
Idle Minimum *
3.2
2.2
31%
2.4
25%
3
6%
3.4
-6%
4.4
-38%
Idle Average *
8.7
11.5
-32%
3.9
55%
8.3
5%
8.8
-1%
6.2
29%
Idle Maximum *
9
11.6
-29%
5.1
43%
8.4
7%
9.3
-3%
7.5
17%
Load Average *
44.7
34.5
23%
42.5
5%
34.3
23%
45.4
-2%
33.6
25%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
51.1
24.4
52%
43.5
15%
45.8
10%
49.4
3%
39
24%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
49.3
26.2
47%
40.2
18%
41
17%
44.8
9%
38.9
21%
Load Maximum *
64.6
37.5
42%
64.4
-0%
65.2
-1%
66.3
-3%
69.3
-7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
29.9

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Efficiency
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 268V, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB
0.544 fps per Watt
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00
0.4975 fps per Watt -9%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V
0.3549 fps per Watt -35%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
0.3171 fps per Watt -42%

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø58.4 (51.5-64.6)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.18 (4.83-5.96)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø51.1 (45.4-55.9)

Power consumption with external monitor

0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø50.4 (47-59.5)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø56.8 (56.1-57.4)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø19.7 (15.9-24.7)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø52.2 (45.2-57.4)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø36.5 (33.8-44.1)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.7 (3.57-4.54)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø49.3 (44.5-51.4)

运行时间

在无线局域网测试中，英特尔测试设备的表现略好于 骁龙版本(都是 64 Wh）。在 150 cd/m² 的条件下，我们测得的时间为 17:41 小时，比 Snapdragon 型号多出近 3 个小时，而在全亮度条件下，我们测得的时间略低于 9 小时。在设备开启的情况下，充满电需要 125 分钟（约 60 分钟后达到 80%）。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
17h 41min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
8h 47min
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V, 64 Wh
1061 min
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 80 Wh
1048 min -1%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 70 Wh
1025 min -3%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 66.5 Wh
988 min -7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 64 Wh
889 min -16%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 70 Wh
783 min -26%
Average of class Office
  (230 - 1614, n=92, last 2 years)
641 min -40%
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 80 Wh
569 min +8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V, 64 Wh
527 min
Average of class Office
  (291 - 945, n=46, last 2 years)
491 min -7%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 70 Wh
459 min -13%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 66.5 Wh
405 min -23%

Notebookcheck 总评分

Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake - 03/23/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
85%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
74 / 80 → 92%
Weight
67 / 20-75 → 86%
Battery
91%
Display
87%
Games Performance
56 / 75 → 75%
Application Performance
85 / 92 → 92%
Temperature
89%
Noise
88%
Audio
84%
Camera
39 / 75 → 52%
Average
72%
87%
Office - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
50%
Materials
50%
Packaging
100%
Power Use
87.1%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 58.2%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Height
Display
1.
87.4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V ⎘
Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD		Amazon:
1. $1,048.99
Microsoft Surface Laptop (20...
2. $1,770.99
Microsoft Surface Laptop 6 1...
3. $23.95
mCover Case ONLY Compatible ...
List Price: 2760€		1.7 kg18.3 mm15.00"
2496x1664
200 PPI
IPS
2.
91.2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4
Apple M4 (10 cores) ⎘
Apple M4 10-core GPU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD		Amazon:
1. $1,149.00
Apple 2025 MacBook Air 15-in...
2. $1,599.95
Apple 2025 MacBook Air 15-in...
3. $1,799.95
Apple 2025 MacBook Air 15-in...
List Price: 1999€		1.5 kg11.5 mm15.30"
2880x1864
224 PPI
IPS
3.
90.1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘
Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD		Amazon:
1. $1,541.86
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Gen 1 ...
2. $39.99
Smatree Hard EVA Protective ...
3. $34.95
BoxWave Screen Protector Com...
List Price: 1989€		1.4 kg17.7 mm15.30"
2880x1800
222 PPI
OLED
4.
84.3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘
16 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD		Amazon: $1,379.99
List Price: 1100 USD		1.7 kg18.29 mm15.00"
2496x1664
200 PPI
IPS
5.
84.3%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘
Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘
16 GB Memory		Amazon:
1. $10.99
KEANBOLL 3 Pack Designed for...
2. $15.88
MUBUY-GOL Anti Blue Light Sc...
3. $949.00
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X Copilot ...
List Price: 1380 USD		1.5 kg13.9 mm15.30"
2880x1800
222 PPI
IPS
6.
83.3%
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 ⎘
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD		Amazon:
1. $719.99
ASUS Vivobook S 15 15" 3K OL...
2. $849.99
ASUS Vivobook S 15 Laptop; C...
3. $799.00
ASUS Vivobook S 15 Business ...
List Price: 1299€		1.4 kg15.9 mm15.60"
2880x1620
212 PPI
OLED

More articles related to this device

Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake (Surface Laptop Series)
Review
•
微软 Surface Laptop 7 15 骁龙笔记本电脑评测：终于更容易维修了

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 微软 Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake 评测--ARM 架构 Windows 系统的一记耳光
Andreas Osthoff, 2025-03-25 (Update: 2025-03-25)