![Teaser](fileadmin/_processed_/8/e/csm_surfacefeature_2278f4cb9a.jpg)
微软 Surface Laptop 7 15 骁龙笔记本电脑评测:终于更容易维修了
现在,它的可维护性得到了改善。
最新的 Surface Laptop 7 解决了该系列在可持续性和可维修性方面长期存在的一些问题。不过,对于一款基于 ARM 的 Windows PC 来说,1500 美元左右的价格可以说过于昂贵。Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
结论 - Windows ARM 非常出色,但并非适合所有人
与 AMD 替代产品和目前市场上的大多数英特尔产品相比,具有非常特殊的使用场景和 ARM 优化应用程序的用户会发现 Surface Laptop 7 15 更安静、更持久、更省电。在不需要对程序进行仿真的情况下,基于骁龙处理器的微软 PC 会大放异彩。否则,该系统并不比价格便宜一半的传统 x86 笔记本电脑快多少。
至于硬件本身,Surface Laptop 7 15 不仅配备了令人印象深刻的 IPS 显示屏,而且维修性也比以前更好。不过,极高的核心温度、薄弱的铰链以及缺少网络摄像头快门等问题证明,该产品的整体设计还需要全面改进,才能更好地与联想、惠普和其他大厂商的旗舰产品竞争。运行英特尔Lunar Lake或更新处理器的笔记本电脑也开始提供与骁龙处理器类似的每瓦性能和电池续航时间优势,而不会出现ARM平台Windows系统通常存在的仿真或兼容性问题。从这个角度来看,考虑到 Surface Laptop 7 15 的高昂起价,它对大多数用户来说可以说并不引人注目。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
亚马逊现已开始销售 Surface Laptop 7 15,配备骁龙 X Elite 12 核、32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD,售价 1600 美元。用户也可以直接从微软购买https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/store/configure/Surface-Laptop-for-Business-Copilot-PC-Snapdragon/8tkcbz02bdvk?crosssellid=&selectedColor=86888a配备 16GB 内存和 256GB 存储空间,起价 1400 美元。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,239.99 List Price: 1100 USD | 1.7 kg | 18.29 mm | 15.00" 2496x1664 200 PPI IPS | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $872.18 Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 N... 2. $1,379.99 Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 1... 3. $1,199.99 Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 L... List Price: 2079€ | 1.6 kg | 14.7 mm | 15.00" 2496x1664 200 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $924.98 Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X Copilot ... 2. $15.88 MUBUY-GOL Anti Blue Light Sc... 3. $23.99 Alapmk Protective Case for L... List Price: 1380 USD | 1.5 kg | 13.9 mm | 15.30" 2880x1800 222 PPI IPS | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $729.00 ASUS Vivobook S 15 Business ... 2. $699.00 ASUS Vivobook S 15 15" 3K OL... 3. $779.00 ASUS Vivobook S 15 Business ... List Price: 1149€ | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 15.60" 2880x1620 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $799.00 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 Busin... 2. $544.95 Lenovo 21MW0001US Thinkbook ... 3. $649.00 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 Busin... List Price: 1399€ | 1.9 kg | 16.9 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI IPS | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $3,131.00 DELL XPS 9530 Laptop 15.6 in... 2. $692.01 Replacement for Dell XPS 15 ... 3. $599.00 Replacement for Dell XPS 15 ... List Price: 2800 USD | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" 3456x2160 261 PPI OLED |
微软正在大力扶持高通公司,这一点从其在 Surface 系列和 Co-Pilot Plus 等主要终端和功能中分别采用骁龙处理器就可见一斑。最新的设备是2024 Surface Laptop 7 15,它与较小的 Surface Laptop 7 13.8同时推出。与较小的 13.8 英寸同类产品一样,它也配备了类似的硬件功能,但外形尺寸更大,为 15 英寸。
我们的测试机为低端配置,配备 256 GB 固态硬盘和 16 GB 内存,售价约为 1400 美元。由于骁龙 X Elite X1E-80-100 处理器和 2496 x 1664 IPS 触摸屏在整个产品系列中保持不变,因此目前的配置仅在颜色、存储和内存方面有所不同。
Surface Laptop 7 15 的替代产品包括其他旗舰商务/多媒体笔记本电脑,如 联想 Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura, 华硕 VivoBook S 15, 惠普精英系列或 戴尔 XPS 15 系列.
更多微软评论:
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
案例 - 同样的设计,更友好的服务
Surface 系列因其明亮的哑光灰色金属设计而广为人知,基于 ARM 的机型也延续了这一趋势。遗憾的是,这也意味着 Surface Laptop 7 15 存在一些我们在早期机型上注意到的问题,包括有限的最大上盖角度(约 135 度)、相对较弱的铰链以及在操作时容易发出嘎吱声。可以说,它的坚固程度不如其他一些流行的办公笔记本电脑,如 ThinkPad X1或 惠普 EliteBook 系列尽管它的设计很吸引人。
长度和宽度均小于旧款 2023 Surface Laptop 5 15的厚度和重量都有所增加。重量增加的部分原因是电池尺寸更大,维修更方便,但整体便携性与上一代机型相比并没有明显的优劣之分。更轻的选择包括 LG Gram 超薄 15相比之下,它的重量不到 1 千克。
连接性
端口选项与 13.8 英寸 Surface Laptop 7 完全相同,外加一个 MicroSD 读卡器。这有点令人失望,因为微软本可以利用更大的机身面积来增加 HDMI 等端口,从而更好地与其他 15 英寸笔记本电脑竞争,例如 联想 Yoga Slim 7 15 Aura.
SD 读卡器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
GPD Win 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
GPD Win 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Acer TravelMate Spin B3 TMB311RN-31-P5KK (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
交流
网络摄像头
微软已将网络摄像头从 2023 年 Surface Laptop 15 的 100 万像素提升到最新 Surface Laptop 7 系列的 200 万像素。与之竞争的笔记本电脑,如 ThinkPad T14 Gen 5 或 惠普 EliteBook Ultra 等同类笔记本电脑标配 500 万像素传感器,画面更清晰。如果你打算经常进行视频会议,那么肯定会有更好的选择。
更糟糕的是,微软系统根本没有集成摄像头快门,尽管这种功能在大多数笔记本电脑上已经变得很普遍。至少,Hello 支持标配了红外功能。
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/1/6/csm_WIN_20250206_08_31_57_Pro_e9998a5c15.jpg)
维护
可持续性
微软宣称,在制造最新的 Surface 笔记本电脑阵容时,100% 采用了可回收的铝合金和稀土金属,与不采取可持续发展措施的同类产品相比,碳排放量减少了 78%,而且许多供应商还增加了无碳污染电力(CFE)。包装本身也是纸和纸板,没有塑料的痕迹。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了交流适配器和一些小文件外,没有其他附件。如果在美国购买,制造商通常提供一年有限保修。
输入设备 - 相同按键,新字体
键盘
Surface 笔记本电脑的键盘每年的变化都很小,因此对于上一代机型的用户来说,打字体验应该不会陌生。尽管如此,按键的手感确实比旧款机型更硬一些,按下时的反馈也更清晰或更锐利。键帽的颜色也略深,字体更大,与亮银色机身形成更好的对比。
触摸板
尽管我们的屏幕尺寸为 15 英寸,但点击板尺寸(12 x 8 厘米)与较小的 13.8 英寸 Surface Laptop 7 相同。触觉反馈也是通过振动来实现的,而不是物理点击,因此不会产生噪音。反过来说,反馈的力度和满意度远不及传统的鼠标按键,如ThinkPad T 系列.
显示屏 - 120 Hz IPS,带 HDR
Surface 笔记本电脑系列一直采用高品质显示屏,尽管选择非常有限。例如,如果买家想要 OLED 而不是 IPS 或更高或更低的分辨率,机型通常不会提供多种选择。对于我们的骁龙机型,夏普 LQ150P1JX61 触摸屏面板是 2023 Surface Laptop 5 上夏普 LQ150P1JX51 面板的升级版,具有更高的原生刷新率(120 Hz 对 60 Hz)、更亮的背光(~550 nits 对 ~400 nits),并支持 HDR 和 Windows DRR(低至 60 Hz)。对于 IPS 面板来说,对比度也相当高,超过 1500:1,而大多数其他面板的对比度通常低于 1000:1。
遗憾的是,该显示器在黑白响应时间和色彩覆盖率方面存在不足。前者意味着在使用过程中会出现更明显的重影,而后者则仅限于 sRGB 模式。微软宣传其色彩 "鲜艳",但在我们的测试中,色彩的质量和深度几乎没有变化。不完美的黑阶和较窄的色彩空间使得 HDR 体验不如采用 OLED 技术的竞争对手,如 VivoBook S 15.
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 597.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 1706:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.96 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
Gamma: 2.13
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite Sharp LQ150P1JX61, IPS, 2496x1664, 15", 120 Hz | Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U LQ150P1JX51, IPS, 2496x1664, 15", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura CSOT T3 MNF307ZB1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD LEN160-3.2K, IPS, 3200x2000, 16", 165 Hz | Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Samsung 156XG01, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.6", 60 Hz | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon ATNA56AC03-0, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | ||||||
Display P3 Coverage | 68.1 | 98.8 | 96.3 | 99.8 | ||
sRGB Coverage | 97.3 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.3 | 87.5 | 86.9 | 98.4 | ||
Response Times | -7% | 40% | 74% | 95% | 99% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44.4 ? | 52.4 ? -18% | 27 ? 39% | 13.9 ? 69% | 1.68 ? 96% | 0.61 ? 99% |
Response Time Black / White * | 30.3 ? | 28.7 ? 5% | 17.9 ? 41% | 6.3 ? 79% | 1.94 ? 94% | 0.67 ? 98% |
PWM Frequency | 22000 ? | 239 | 240 ? | |||
Screen | 0% | -37% | -32% | -130% | 130% | |
Brightness middle | 579.9 | 397 -32% | 509 -12% | 422 -27% | 389.5 -33% | 378 -35% |
Brightness | 576 | 399 -31% | 479 -17% | 403 -30% | 392 -32% | 379 -34% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 85 -8% | 90 -2% | 93 1% | 98 7% | 98 7% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.29 15% | 0.32 6% | 0.3 12% | 0.02 94% | |
Contrast | 1706 | 1369 -20% | 1591 -7% | 1407 -18% | 18900 1008% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.96 | 0.8 17% | 2.47 -157% | 1.7 -77% | 4.95 -416% | 1 -4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.39 | 1.4 41% | 4.73 -98% | 3.4 -42% | 8.65 -262% | 2.6 -9% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.1 21% | 1.5 -7% | 2.4 -71% | 2 -43% | 1.2 14% |
Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.18 101% | 2.19 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.19 100% |
CCT | 6407 101% | 6705 97% | 6790 96% | 6989 93% | 6265 104% | 6460 101% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.06 | 0.7 | 1.53 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-1% | 2% /
-21% | 21% /
-10% | -18% /
-74% | 115% /
124% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.9 ms rise | |
↘ 14.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.3 ms rise | |
↘ 23.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8623 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 从良好到卓越
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为最佳性能模式。令人讨厌的是,通常的 "安静"、"平衡 "和 "性能 "电源配置文件已分别更改为 "推荐"、"更好的性能 "和 "最佳性能"。
处理器
与传统的英特尔或 AMD CPU 不同,处理器的性能会因应用程序的不同而大相径庭。如果程序必须进行仿真,那么原始多线程性能并不比老式的 酷睿 i7-1255U或 Ryzen 7 7730U.如果程序原生支持 ARM,那么原始性能就会超过新的 酷睿至尊 7 256V的 1.5 倍,从而与 Ryzen AI 9 365.
鉴于我们在下面压力测试部分的核心温度调查结果,性能的可持续性还有待提高,这并不奇怪。例如,在反复运行 CineBench R15 xT 时,仅第一个循环后性能就会下降 15%。
该机型配备了完全相同的 12 核 骁龙 X Elite X1E-80-100处理器。与 13.8 英寸版本不同的是,没有速度更慢的 10 核处理器可供选择。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench 2024: CPU Single Core | CPU Multi Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 -4! | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 -2! | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura -2! | |
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) -2! | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ -2! | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite -2! | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 -2! | |
Acer Aspire Vero AV15-53P -2! | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U -4! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core -2! | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 15 AMD TFF_00028 -4! | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 -14! | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 -6! |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (122 - 123, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (621 - 927, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 Gen 4 21H70021GE |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench 2024: CPU Single Core | CPU Multi Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (2184 - 7339, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (5687 - 26391, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (2607 - 2949, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (67219 - 69762, n=6) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (1521 - 2357, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (10117 - 15669, n=6) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (39956 - 71089, n=6) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (398 - 802, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (2581 - 4044, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (28474 - 38707, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core |
压力测试
运行苛刻负载时的核心温度比我们希望的要高。例如,在运行《赛博朋克 2077》时,CPU 在 "更佳性能 "和 "最佳性能 "模式下的温度分别稳定在 86 C 和 94 C,在节流的情况下开销很小。当设置为 "更佳性能 "模式而非 "最佳性能 "模式时,CPU 还能更动态地降频至 2.3 GHz。相比之下,在联想 Yoga Slim 上重复同样的测试 联想 Yoga Slim 7 15 Aura会导致核心温度明显降低,仅为 66 C。
在最佳性能模式下运行 Prime95 时,CPU 将稳定在 3.4 GHz,核心温度高达 95 C,比大多数同类办公笔记本电脑要高得多。
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 32 |
Prime95 压力 | 3.4 | -- | 95 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.9 | 744 | 73 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力(更佳性能模式) | ~2.3 | 1250 | 86 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力(最佳性能模式) | 3.4 | 1250 | 94 |
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark / Overall | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1356 - 1443, n=6) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1271 - 1375, n=6) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1492 - 1537, n=6) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1237 - 1401, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (430 - 455, n=6) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (295 - 324, n=6) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (391 - 422, n=6) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (44795 - 63495, n=6) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (58855 - 125604, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (37270 - 45265, n=6) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (7.4 - 8.8, n=6) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
存储设备
我们的设备配有一个短 三星 M.2 2242 固态硬盘就像较小的 13.8 英寸 Surface Laptop 7 一样。传输速率只有较大的三星 PM9A1 的一半,约为 3600 MB/s,但性能至少是稳定的,没有发现明显的节流问题。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
集成 SD X Adreno X1-85GPU 的性能也是好坏参半,具体取决于应用。如果运行模拟软件,图形性能可与老化的Iris Xe Graphics G7 96 EUs.但如果运行本机软件,3DMark Wild Life Extreme 预测其性能水平将接近 Radeon 780M或 880M 系列是纸面上速度更快的集成解决方案之一。
电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
最佳性能模式 | 6311 | 18944 | 2674 |
性能更佳模式 | 5730 (-9%) | 18497 (-2%) | 2635 (-0%) |
电池电量 | 6299 (-0%) | 18979 (-0%) | 2690 (-0%) |
请注意,根据我们的Fire Strike 结果表,在 "更佳性能 "模式而非 "最佳性能 "模式下运行,图形性能最多会受到 10% 的影响。
3DMark 11 Performance | 6884 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25367 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6105 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Surface 系列不是为游戏玩家设计的,我们的 ARM 机型更是如此。不仅《孤岛惊魂 5》(Far Cry 5)等游戏无法启动,大多数游戏在最低的 1080p 设置下也几乎无法运行,对于《赛博朋克 2077》(Cyberpunk 2077)等要求更高的游戏,甚至连 720p 也无法运行。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 102.4 | 91.6 | 49.1 | 21.8 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 89.5 | 70.9 | 64.9 | 57.7 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 57.7 | 24.9 | 15.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 37.5 | |||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 140.7 | 50.9 | 42.2 | |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 44.7 | 33.7 | 22.3 | 17.9 |
F1 22 (2022) | 62.6 | 55.4 | 37.8 | 28.7 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 24.2 | 20.7 | 17.8 | 17.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 25.1 | 20.3 | 15.3 |
排放--最安静的地面选择之一
系统噪音
与 2023 英特尔机型相比,这款笔记本的风扇更安静,也更慵懒,这意味着在运行高负载时,风扇需要更长的时间来提升转速。例如,在运行3DMark 06的第一个基准场景时,噪音水平几乎不会达到 26 dB(A),而 2023 Surface Laptop 5 15 在运行相同测试时则会达到 35 dB(A)。主观而言,在典型的办公环境中,风扇在日常负载下几乎不会被察觉。
我们能记录到的最大噪音水平略高于 33 dB(A),明显低于大多数其他 15 英寸笔记本电脑,包括 Vivobook S 15 OLEDVivobook S 15 OLED)相比要安静得多。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.3 / 23.3 / 23.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 25.7 / 33.2 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ | Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -9% | -11% | -17% | -7% | -12% | |
off / environment * | 23.3 | 23.3 -0% | 23.2 -0% | 24.5 -5% | 23.1 1% | 24.3 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.3 | 23.3 -0% | 23.2 -0% | 24.5 -5% | 23.1 1% | 24.3 -4% |
Idle Average * | 23.3 | 23.3 -0% | 23.2 -0% | 24.5 -5% | 23.1 1% | 24.3 -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.3 | 23.3 -0% | 26.1 -12% | 25.9 -11% | 24.2 -4% | 26.2 -12% |
Load Average * | 25.7 | 35 -36% | 30.9 -20% | 36.2 -41% | 27.1 -5% | 32.5 -26% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 31.1 | 34.1 -10% | 40.1 -29% | 35.2 -13% | ||
Load Maximum * | 33.2 | 38.1 -15% | 44.3 -33% | 40.1 -21% | 44.6 -34% | 39.8 -20% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.1 | 40.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于键盘采用金属结构,底盖上没有任何通风栅,因此表面温度可能会很高。在运行要求较高的负载时,键盘中心和底部的热点温度可分别达到 40 摄氏度和 37 摄氏度以上,而联想 Yoga Slim 7 的热点温度为 41 摄氏度至 47 摄氏度。 联想 Yoga Slim 7 15.在使用过程中,掌托的温度会明显升高,但还不至于让人感到不舒服或分心,因为发热点一般都在机身后部。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.2 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.6 °C / 79.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+1 °C / 1.8 F).
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M | Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -8% | -30% | -4% | -30% | -21% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45.4 | 44.6 2% | 46.2 -2% | 38.2 16% | 45.6 -0% | 43.6 4% |
Maximum Bottom * | 37.2 | 47.4 -27% | 41 -10% | 37.9 -2% | 42 -13% | 53.1 -43% |
Idle Upper Side * | 22.4 | 22.6 -1% | 34 -52% | 25.4 -13% | 34.4 -54% | 26.7 -19% |
Idle Bottom * | 22 | 23.3 -6% | 33.8 -54% | 25.7 -17% | 33.2 -51% | 27.2 -24% |
* ... smaller is better
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - ARM 效率
耗电量
Surface Laptop 7 15 ARM 采用与旧款 Surface Laptop 5 15 相同的电源包络线,每瓦性能卓越,尤其是在运行 ARM 本机应用程序时。例如,多线程性能比酷睿 i7-1255U 快 2.5 倍以上,而功耗仅高出几瓦。我们系统的效率也明显高于采用 Zen 5 处理器的 ThinkBook 16 G7+但在每瓦性能方面,配备最新酷睿至尊 7 256V 的 Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura 与我们的 Snapdragon 相比更具竞争力。
当 CPU 的利用率达到 100%时,我们可以通过小巧(约 9 x 5 x 2.5 厘米)的 65 瓦交流适配器记录到 65 瓦的最大功耗。不过,这只是暂时的,因为时钟频率会在几秒钟后自动回调,以控制温度,就像其他采用 U 系列 CPU 的笔记本电脑一样。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ, IPS, 2496x1664, 15" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N, IPS, 2496x1664, 15" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, , IPS, 2880x1800, 15.3" | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, IPS, 3200x2000, 16" | Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.6" | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -16% | -12% | -88% | -223% | 1% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3 | 3.8 -27% | 3.4 -13% | 6.4 -113% | 20 -567% | 4.4 -47% |
Idle Average * | 8.3 | 8.2 1% | 8.8 -6% | 14.1 -70% | 20.7 -149% | 6.2 25% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.4 | 8.4 -0% | 9.3 -11% | 14.3 -70% | 22.4 -167% | 7.5 11% |
Load Average * | 34.3 | 50.1 -46% | 45.4 -32% | 83.4 -143% | 77.1 -125% | 33.6 2% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 41 | 44.8 -9% | 77.5 -89% | 38.9 5% | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 45.8 | 49.4 -8% | 79.8 -74% | 39 15% | ||
Load Maximum * | 65.2 | 69.6 -7% | 66.3 -2% | 102.9 -58% | 133.4 -105% | 69.3 -6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.8 | 95.4 | 29.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
超长的运行时间是该机型的一大亮点,这也是搭载 ARM 处理器的系统所应具备的。我们可以记录下近 15 个小时的 WLAN 实际浏览时间,比联想 ThinkBook 16 G7+ 或更老的产品还要长几个小时。 Surface Laptop 5 15.与上一代产品相比,微软还提高了电池容量。尽管如此,采用最新英特尔Lunar Lake CPU的笔记本电脑,如 联想 Yoga Slim 7 15开始提供比许多搭载骁龙处理器的产品更长的电池续航时间。
遗憾的是,使用随附的交流适配器充电时,充电速度较慢,需要近 3 个小时,而大多数其他笔记本电脑只需约 90 分钟。
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 64 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 47.4 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 70 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 85 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 70 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -5% | 34% | -27% | -41% | -10% | |
Reader / Idle | 1902 | 2760 45% | 688 -64% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 889 | 517 -42% | 1025 15% | 649 -27% | 481 -46% | 783 -12% |
Load | 104 | 138 33% | 148 42% | 89 -14% | 97 -7% | |
H.264 | 584 | 976 | 832 | 885 |
笔记本检查评级
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite
- 02/14/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.