联想ThinkPad X13s G1笔记本电脑评论。高通骁龙8cx第三代的介绍
直到现在，ThinkPad和x86架构一直紧密相连。除了90年代在IBM标签下对PowerPC的短暂探索，ThinkPad笔记本电脑一直使用英特尔或AMD处理器。但科技领域正在发生变化，高通公司正试图从PC领域的顶级公司手中夺取一些市场份额。
到目前为止，ARM上的Windows还没有获得成功，除了性能不足之外，这主要是由于应用程序兼容性不好。虽然后者在Windows 11中略有改善，但在性能方面，现在有了高通骁龙8cx第三代，这是在联想ThinkPad X13s中首次引入。这也是联想的第一款ARM ThinkPad和第一款无风扇设计，这也可能使这款13.3英寸的笔记本电脑成为有趣的竞争对手，也是被动冷却的Apple MacBook Air 。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.7 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690 | 1.1 kg | 13.4 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1200 | |
| 90.6 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE R5 PRO 5650U, Vega 7 | 1.4 kg | 18.19 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1200 | |
| 92.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2, M2 8-Core GPU | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" | 2560x1664 | |
| 91 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | HP Elite Dragonfly G3 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 16.3 mm | 13.50" | 1920x1280 | |
| 88.2 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.2 kg | 14 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
| 88.9 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 958 g | 14.4 mm | 13.00" | 2160x1350 |
外壳。深灰色的镁合金ThinkPad
在早些时候，X系列的s型产品的设计几乎与普通的同类产品相同，而联想为ThinkPad X13s采用了独特的设计，它在其他ThinkPads中明显突出，如 ThinkPad X13 G2.一个共同点是，联想目前对几乎所有的ThinkPads都采用了深灰色的外壳颜色。与老款ThinkPads的黑色外壳相比，这导致外壳上的指纹不那么明显。
但相似之处已经在设计语言上结束。X13s的外壳整体更加圆润，有圆角和边缘。与目前许多其他ThinkPad笔记本电脑相比，它也不是朝前倾斜的。这也是X13s与 笔记本Z13，就像显示屏盖子上的摄像头凸起一样，这也是一个打开盖子的实用把手。然而，ThinkPad X13s的显示屏开启角度被限制在135度，这对ThinkPad来说是不寻常的。
外壳由玻璃纤维塑料和镁合金混合制成，这也是ThinkPad经常使用的。但有趣的是，联想使用这一概念的方式与普通的 ThinkPad X13，比如说。在ThinkPad X13s中，不是显示屏盖子，而是部分基本单元由玻璃纤维制成。显示屏盖由黑色漆面的镁合金制成，这使得显示单元相当坚固，可以抵抗翘曲。 就其稳定性而言，基本单元也没有什么理由抱怨，即使铝制设计在抵抗翘曲的硬度方面有一些优势。
由于其纤细的显示屏边框，联想ThinkPad X13s比许多竞争对手略显紧凑。但只有 戴尔XPS 13 9315才真正小得多。就重量而言，ThinkPad X13s G1也是较轻的设备之一，尽管 ThinkPad X1 Nano甚至更轻。
设备。没有HDMI但有5G的联想笔记本电脑
与普通的ThinkPad X13相比，ThinkPad X13s放弃了USB-A和HDMI等传统的端口。取而代之的是，连接设备的数量也类似于 削减了连接设备，与ThinkPad X1 Nano，ThinkPad X13s也没有提供Thunderbolt或USB 4。ARM ThinkPad提供的最大限度是USB 3.2 Gen 2.但至少，两个USB-C端口也可用作DisplayPort或为设备充电。
沟通
两个通信模块中的第一个是高通WCN685x。这个2x2模块应该支持WiFi 6E标准，但在我们的测试装置中，相应的基准测试结果是极低的数值，所以WiFi 6E模式并没有真正正常工作。幸运的是，至少常规的WiFi 6可以顺利工作，联想ThinkPad X13s在这里实现了高传输率。
作为连接互联网的第二个选择，还有高通X55 5G调制解调器形式的WWAN。虽然一般有mmWave和Sub6型号，但这里的X13s并没有mmWave。此外，你必须注意，也有没有WWAN的型号，如果一开始没有包括5G，之后就不能安装。
网络摄像头
凭借其专用的凸起，摄像头是联想ThinkPad X13s的一个突出的设计特点。它的分辨率为500万像素，是目前ThinkPad中分辨率最高的产品之一。录像的质量确实值得一看，对于笔记本电脑来说，它是一个很好的网络摄像头。
安全问题
除了这里集成在电源按钮上的强制性指纹识别器之外，联想ThinkPad X13s还在右侧提供了一个Kensington锁，与相应的锁结合起来可以保护笔记本电脑不被盗。显示屏盖上还有一个红外摄像头，可用于通过Windows Hello安全登录，作为指纹识别器的替代。
辅料
除了ThinkPad笔记本电脑，盒子里只包括65瓦的充电器。在对接方面。由于笔记本电脑缺乏Thunderbolt，你不能使用这个标准的底座。在其 "Smartfind "配件网站上，联想只列出了一个与ThinkPad X13s兼容的USB-C底座（ThinkPad Universal USB-C Dock).
维护
打开联想ThinkPad X13s G1是比较容易的。底部总共有6颗螺丝需要卸下。螺丝留在底盖中，所以不会丢失。服务盖也是用背面的几个夹子固定的，但这些夹子可以用塑料撬具轻松松开。
由于工作存储器是焊接在一起的，所以ThinkPad笔记本电脑没有提供很多升级选项。M.2-2242固态硬盘可以被替换，但只能用模块底部没有芯片的型号。在交付状态下，固态硬盘和5G模块隐藏在铜制散热片下面，但只要松开2颗螺丝就可以轻松地拆下来。
与ThinkPad X13第三代不同的是：X13s的键盘不能被用户轻易更换。
担保
默认情况下，联想ThinkPad X13s包括一个标准的3年保修期，其中包括提货和退货服务。在需要服务的情况下，设备将由制造商取回并进行维修。作为一款商务设备，除了事故保险和延长电池保修期外，还可选择升级现场服务。 保修期还可延长至五年。(在德国购买时）X13s的保修主要只在德国（即你购买的国家）有效，但作为商务笔记本，ThinkPads在保修期内也有一个国际带入保修。
输入设备。ThinkPad TrackPoint有一些不寻常的问题
键盘
就像普通的ThinkPad X13和ThinkPad X1 Nano G2一样，联想ThinkPad X13s Gen 1也有一个缩小了95%尺寸布局的键盘。这意味着右侧一些按键的宽度明显减少，顶部一排按键的高度降低，键盘上的按键比14英寸ThinkPad少了一个（插入键），所有按键总体上都小了很多。就打字体验而言，X13s的背光键盘与X1 Nano相比，更符合X13的要求，因为按键行程为1.35毫米（约0.05英寸）。因此，X13s在目前的ThinkPad产品系列中处于低端。但是不要误解我的意思--这是一个优秀的键盘。它只是不大能够跟上那些较大的ThinkPad，因为它只是缺少一点深度。
触摸板和TrackPoint
触摸板为11.5 x 5.6厘米（约4.5 x 2.2英寸），相对较大。ClickPad的表面由麦拉塑料制成，联想称之为 "类似玻璃"。它确实非常光滑，至少看起来像玻璃，而且让你的手指非常容易滑动。 机械装置也得到了类似的良好评价。可以在底部区域点击ClickPad，点击声很低，而且触摸板不会晃动。软件功能（准确性、手势）也没有理由抱怨。这是一块好的触摸板，即使它没有达到最高水平。
另外，还有TrackPoint，允许你通过按压红色指点杆来移动鼠标指针。触摸板上方的三个键属于TrackPoint。像往常一样，一旦你习惯了，这就是触摸板的一个非常好的替代品。然而，在ThinkPad X13s中，TrackPoint并不像其他ThinkPad那样好：不幸的是，至少在我们的测试设备中，鼠标指针略微摇晃，并不完全流畅。
联想ThinkPad的显示屏可以更亮一些
与ThinkPad笔记本电脑一样，ThinkPad X13s也有多种显示屏选择。然而，所有可用的16:10格式的13.3英寸显示屏都具有相同的分辨率，即WUXGA（1920 x 1080像素）。此外，所有的面板都有一个共同的哑光表面。差异在于细节。
- 选项1：300 cd/m²，100% sRGB
- 选项2：300 cd/m², 72% NTSC, on-cell multi-touch
- 选项3：400 cd/m², 100% sRGB, 低功耗
到目前为止还不错，我们测试设备的基本面板只是勉强达到了承诺的300cd/m²。只有293cd/m²，它是我们比较中最暗的显示屏，所以联想显然在显示屏上走了一些弯路。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 307 cd/m²
Contrast: 1335:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE NV133WUM-N61 , a-Si IPS LED, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE NV133WUM-N61, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6" | HP Elite Dragonfly G3 Chi Mei CMN13C0, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U Sharp SHP1548 LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P P101ZFZ-BH2, IPS, 2160x1350, 13" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | ||||||
| Display P3 Coverage | 70.1 | 98.4 | 68 | 69 | 66.2 | |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 99.9 | 98.3 | 100 | 96.1 | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.3 | 87.6 | 69.9 | 71 | 68.3 | |
| Response Times | -27% | -33% | -96% | -38% | -55% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 27 ? | 34 ? -26% | 32.9 ? -22% | 50.8 ? -88% | 40 ? -48% | 43.6 ? -61% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 17.3 ? | 22 ? -27% | 24.9 ? -44% | 35.2 ? -103% | 22 ? -27% | 25.6 ? -48% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | -4% | 12% | -15% | -30% | -64% | |
| Brightness middle | 307 | 309 1% | 526 71% | 387.2 26% | 466 52% | 469.6 53% |
| Brightness | 293 | 297 1% | 486 66% | 360 23% | 442 51% | 460 57% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 81 -13% | 87 -6% | 80 -14% | 89 -4% | 94 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.26 -13% | 0.38 -65% | 0.26 -13% | 0.4 -74% | 0.37 -61% |
| Contrast | 1335 | 1188 -11% | 1384 4% | 1489 12% | 1165 -13% | 1269 -5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.6 -14% | 1.3 7% | 2.36 -69% | 3.03 -116% | 4.85 -246% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.4 | 3 32% | 2.7 39% | 4.79 -9% | 6.68 -52% | 7.62 -73% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 2 -18% | 2 -18% | 3 -76% | 3.12 -84% | 5.7 -235% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.17 101% | 2.41 91% | 2.13 103% |
| CCT | 6630 98% | 6315 103% | 6858 95% | 6137 106% | 6418 101% | 6931 94% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.63 | 2.34 | 1.22 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-9% | -11% /
3% | -56% /
-31% | -34% /
-32% | -60% /
-62% |
* ... smaller is better
由于缺乏驱动程序，我们很遗憾无法校准联想ThinkPad X13s的显示屏。使用CalMan和X-Rite i1Pro 2色度计进行的基本测量效果良好。至少，在交付状态下，与理想值的偏差不是非常高，因此，即使没有校准，Delta-E值也变得相对较低。
我们也不得不放弃对色彩空间值的定期测量。然而，使用CalMan，我们测量到99.7%的sRGB色彩空间的覆盖率，但只是在不太宽的二维联盟中。
在户外，显示屏的低亮度值已经使事情变得很困难，即使有磨砂的表面。你肯定应该避免阳光直射。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
从侧面或从顶部或底部的角度看它，显示屏会失去一些亮度。否则，IPS液晶屏的视角稳定性不会给人任何抱怨的理由。
性能。高通公司取得了一些进展，但还没有突破性进展
对于X86 ThinkPads，客户几乎总是可以在各种处理器中进行选择。然而，联想ThinkPad X13s G1的情况并非如此，它总是包括 高通骁龙8cx第三代.其集成图形芯片处理图形加速。工作内存是焊接而成的，有8、16或32GB的LPDDR4X存储。一块M.2-2242固态硬盘作为存储解决方案。
测试条件
联想ThinkPad X13s Gen 1没有提供任何不同的电源模式，而且你也不能像往常一样用HWiNFO读取处理器的TDP。根据高通公司的说法，该处理器的TDP为7瓦。
与之前所有的Windows on ARM（WoA）设备一样，有几个基准测试不工作。但至少我们可以说，有了Windows 11和64位模拟，现在能够运行的基准测试明显增多。
处理器
随着高通骁龙8xc第三代这款由高通公司专门为PC设计的处理器进入了第三代，就像它的名字一样。与目前的英特尔Alder Lake CPU一样，这种ARM处理器也有两种内核。4个性能核心（最高3GHz）和4个效率核心（最高2.4GHz）。你可以在我们的《CPU列表》中找到与其他处理器更深入的基准比较 CPU列表.
即使高通公司在这方面取得了一些进展，但在追赶英特尔、AMD和Apple ，这家CPU制造商仍有许多工作要做。在单核性能方面的差异尤其明显，所有其他对比笔记本电脑的速度都是其两倍以上。x86芯片和ARM CPU在几个核心的负载下的性能也明显更快。即使是戴尔XPS 13 9315的英特尔酷睿-1230U，在Cinebench-R23多核测试中被限制在10瓦以内，仍然快了约25%。
在电池运行中，CPU的性能没有额外的限制。
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry -5! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U -4! | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (3534 - 3709, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (559 - 608, n=3) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (810 - 1258, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (199 - 222, n=3) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (1059 - 1600, n=3) | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (16223 - 24505, n=3) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (3874 - 3946, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (4457 - 7522, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (1486 - 1690, n=2) | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (1.5 - 2.68, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (115.5 - 121.5, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (1.011 - 1.013, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (343 - 2627, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (13729 - 14650, n=3) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (453 - 1144, n=3) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (15447 - 27474, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (1161 - 1257, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (7085 - 7704, n=3) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (638 - 1279, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (398 - 412, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (204 - 1379, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (7622 - 14660, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
系统性能
虽然PCMark 10基准没有运行，但联想ThinkPad X13s Gen 3能够完成CrossMark基准的测试。在这个我们用来衡量一般系统性能的基准中，ARM笔记本电脑的速度只有其最接近的X86竞争对手的一半左右。然而，我们并不认为ThinkPad X13在日常操作中显得很慢，如网上冲浪和Office操作。对于这些简单的应用场景，它的速度足够快，而且ThinkPad在后台播放4K UHD视频时也能顺利运行。
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690 (627 - 718, n=2) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690 (586 - 685, n=2) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690 (740 - 776, n=2) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690 (468 - 652, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (40599 - 42710, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (33013 - 33757, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 117897, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (49100 - 49815, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (10.2 - 18.8, n=3) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U | |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
与目前的英特尔和AMD平台相比，高通骁龙8cx第三代还不支持PCIe 4.0。这里使用的512GB容量的M.2-2242固态硬盘是由制造商UMIS制造的，不得不使用PCIe 3.0。这在基准测试中也很明显，因为在我们的比较中，这种固态硬盘显然是最慢的，这在复制大量数据时应该变得特别明显。
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
就其性能而言，联想ThinkPad X13s G1的集成高通GPU大约对应于英特尔UHD图形芯片。有了这一点，其性能足以满足日常操作，但对于更困难的任务来说还不够。大多数游戏甚至不会在ThinkPad X13s上运行，也许除了Windows商店的游戏。如果图形性能是你的重点，那么ThinkPad笔记本电脑显然是错误的设备。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3115 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 15415 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 11034 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2758 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 909 points | |
Help | ||
| low | med. | high | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 57.5 | 54.5 | 38.8 | 29.4 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start |
排放物。虽然音量很大，但温度却不高。
噪声排放
联想ThinkPad X13s是完全被动冷却的，所以没有风扇。我们也没有注意到任何其他恼人的噪音。
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE Vega 7, R5 PRO 5650U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z | HP Elite Dragonfly G3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1230U, Micron 3460 256 GB Soldered | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1280P, Kioxia BG5 KBG5AZNT1T02 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | ||||||
| off / environment * | 24.17 | 22.8 | 26 | 23.3 | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 24.17 | 23.2 | 26 | 23.9 | ||
| Idle Average * | 24.17 | 23.2 | 26 | 23.9 | ||
| Idle Maximum * | 24.17 | 23.2 | 27.5 | 23.9 | ||
| Load Average * | 29.92 | 25.1 | 39.5 | 23.3 | ||
| Load Maximum * | 31.52 | 35.2 | 39.6 | 40.9 | ||
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 32 | 39.6 | 40.9 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
如果没有主动冷却，联想ThinkPad X13s只能通过辐射热量来被动冷却。在低负载的情况下，这非常有效。然而，在满负荷的情况下，我们在本案例中用Prime95模拟（因为FurMark不起作用），联想ThinkPad X13s变得非常热。底部的最高温度为64.4 ºC（148 ºF），甚至可能导致一些轻微的灼伤。 当然，这种极端的压力测试情况不能与日常使用相比。 然而，它向我们展示了另一个原因，为什么ThinkPad X13s不适合高要求的任务。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 64.4 °C / 148 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.4 °C / 90.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690 | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU | HP Elite Dragonfly G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U Intel Core i5-1230U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 18% | 20% | 16% | -2% | 14% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 59 | 43.7 26% | 44.5 25% | 39 34% | 42.3 28% | 42.4 28% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 64.4 | 38 41% | 44.4 31% | 42.2 34% | 44.9 30% | 40.2 38% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 26.5 | 25.8 3% | 23.9 10% | 26.8 -1% | 32.5 -23% | 27.8 -5% |
| Idle Bottom * | 26.8 | 26.2 2% | 23.6 12% | 28.2 -5% | 38.2 -43% | 27.8 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
对于一台紧凑型笔记本电脑来说，联想ThinkPad X13s的扬声器还不错，尽管它们缺乏低音，也缺乏一些音量。扬声器ThinkPad X1 Nano G2提供了更好的扬声器。
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.49 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理。ThinkPad X13s的效率非常高
消耗功率
除了静音运行外，低功耗应该是ARM芯片的另一个优势。而事实上，所有其他竞争对手的平均耗电量都高于联想ThinkPad X13s。然而，他们的平均值被竞争对手的高负荷消耗扭曲了。再仔细看看，ThinkPad的ARM芯片也不是没有同行的。Apple M2芯片的最低空闲消耗明显低于高通CPU的消耗。芯片的 联想ThinkPad Z13采用Ryzen 6000也有较低的空闲消耗。
最大消耗在50瓦左右，所以65瓦的充电器尺寸足够大。
| Off / Standby |   0.41 / 0.43 Watt |
| Idle |  2.6 / 4.9 / 5.2 Watt |
| Load |
21.5 / 49.8 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ, a-Si IPS LED, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE R5 PRO 5650U, Vega 7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2, M2 8-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0256Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6" | HP Elite Dragonfly G3 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Micron 3460 256 GB Soldered, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Kioxia BG5 KBG5AZNT1T02, IPS, 2160x1350, 13" | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW R5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 13.3" | Average Qualcomm Adreno 690 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -33% | -27% | -47% | -23% | -85% | -32% | -23% | -73% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.6 | 3.82 -47% | 1.87 28% | 3.4 -31% | 3.6 -38% | 3.4 -31% | 2.4 8% | 2.87 ? -10% | 4.47 ? -72% |
| Idle Average * | 4.9 | 5.74 -17% | 9.2 -88% | 5.6 -14% | 6.8 -39% | 6.5 -33% | 4.6 6% | 6.13 ? -25% | 7.63 ? -56% |
| Idle Maximum * | 5.2 | 7.65 -47% | 9.3 -79% | 8.4 -62% | 6.8 -31% | 14.4 -177% | 5.1 2% | 9.53 ? -83% | 9.57 ? -84% |
| Load Average * | 21.5 | 35.79 -66% | 28.5 -33% | 40.8 -90% | 24 -12% | 54.5 -153% | 53.1 -147% | 22.7 ? -6% | 46.5 ? -116% |
| Load Maximum * | 49.8 | 45.04 10% | 31 38% | 68.4 -37% | 47 6% | 65.4 -31% | 63.7 -28% | 45.6 ? 8% | 68.5 ? -38% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.6 | 27.4 | 35.5 | 23.6 | 44 | 27.6 |
* ... smaller is better
电池寿命
联想从49.5瓦时的电池中获得了非常好的电池寿命：在WiFi测试中，在150cd/m²的显示亮度下，14小时是一个非常好的结果。然而，X13s仍然被以下产品所超越 Apple MacBook Air M2，尽管MacBook的CPU明显更强大。联想 联想Thinkpad Z13配备了AMD Ryzen 6000和戴尔XPS 13 9315也超过了它。
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690, 49.5 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE R5 PRO 5650U, Vega 7, 54.7 Wh | Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2, M2 8-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh | HP Elite Dragonfly G3 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 68 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9315, i5-1230U i5-1230U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 51 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 49.5 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW R5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M, 51.5 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -34% | -4% | 1% | -3% | -64% | -11% | -19% | |
| H.264 | 976 | 814 -17% | 989 1% | 979 0% | 911 ? -7% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 848 | 556 -34% | 910 7% | 706 -17% | 888 5% | 303 -64% | 863 2% | 727 ? -14% |
| Load | 177 | 86 -51% | 144 -19% | 209 18% | 157 -11% | 113 -36% | 115.7 ? -35% |
Pros
Cons
结论：ThinkPad X13s可能是更好的ARM未来的一个预兆
Windows和ARM，这种软件和硬件的结合到现在为止一直都不是爱情婚姻。为提高效率而设计的PC和RISC CPU还没有成为一个真正的好组合。通过Windows 11和ThinkPad X13s，微软和联想正在做出另一种努力。经过我们的审查，我们可以说这已经是迄今为止最好的尝试了。但它仍然不足以实现平台的突破。
这是由软件和硬件两方面造成的。即使Windows 11向前迈进了一大步，但仍有许多应用程序在仿真后仍无法运行。而在硬件方面，高通骁龙8xc第三代的速度比上一代快，但它的运行速度仍然无法与目前英特尔和AMD的x86芯片或Apple M系列的处理器相比。至少，在这一点上，其性能足以满足日常任务的需要，因此，实际可用性明显高于早期的ARM PC。看一眼ThinkPad X13s的电池寿命和噪音量也表明，ARM和Windows的结合在未来有潜力。它是完全静音的，并且有相当好的续航能力。然而，安静的运行是以负载下的高外壳温度为代价的。所以在这方面也有改进的余地。
除了平台之外，联想ThinkPad X13s是一款非常好的移动工作设备，适合商务旅行者。这也是联想的营销方式，该设备能够很好地服务于这个利基市场。 它非常轻，但仍然很坚固，提供5G，一个好的键盘，以及一个哑光显示屏，即使这可以更亮，键盘可以提供更长的行程。一个弱点在于连接设备，商业客户可能会特别怀念HDMI。此外，这款机型的TrackPoint对于ThinkPad来说一反常态地不精确。
轻巧、安静和长续航能力--这些优点使ThinkPad X13s成为一款非常好的副笔记本，但由于采用了ARM处理器，买家仍然不得不忍受一些限制。
然而，由于积极的特性总体上超过了消极的特性，而且ThinkPad X13s G1非常适合其作为副笔记本的目标用途，这仍然导致在积极范围内的评价。
另一方面，这个细分市场的竞争者具有非常高的质量，他们都有明显的性能和应用兼容性的共同点。Apple MacBook Air 也是静音的，仍然提供了非常好的性能和长的电池寿命。联想ThinkPad Z13 也有一些明显的性能优势，并提供类似的电池寿命，尽管它有一个风扇。不过这两款笔记本电脑都明显比ThinkPad X13s重。而且都不提供5G，MacBook甚至不包括LTE。联想ThinkPad X1 Nano G2 不存在这些缺点。它同样轻巧，并包括5G，但采用英特尔CPU的电池寿命比竞争对手低几个等级。戴尔XPS 13 ，它也可以用英特尔做得更好，但是，就像MacBook Air一样，它也没有WWAN。此外，SSD是焊接的，这是与Apple 设备的另一个共同点。另一个有趣的选择可能是HP Elite Dragonfly ，它也稍重，电池寿命较短，但包括WWAN。
价格和可用性
联想ThinkPad X13s G1目前可直接从联想购买，起价约为 995美元。配置为8GB内存和256GB固态硬盘。亚马逊提供的ThinkPad X13s的价格约为$1287，配备16GB内存。(关联链接)。
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE
- 10/26/2022 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
