宏碁 Swift Edge 16 评论：配备 OLED 显示屏的轻量级 16 英寸笔记本电脑
身材苗条。
传统上，16 英寸笔记本电脑只是部分用于频繁出差或旅行的便携伴侣。不过，宏碁的 Swift Edge 16 显示，事情可以做得不一样。我们的评测将揭示这款相当罕见的 Ryzen 5 8640U 能带来什么。Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
评价：总体而言超级便携，但运行时间较短
如果您正在寻找一款重量特别轻、显示屏尺寸适中的笔记本电脑，那么您可能会喜欢宏碁的 Swift Edge 16。这款 16 英寸笔记本电脑的重量只有 1.2 千克多一点，不仅适合放在办公桌上使用，而且在移动时也非常轻便。另一方面，它安装的 OLED 面板也面临着常见的优缺点。虽然它的黑度、对比度和响应时间令人印象深刻，但其闪烁和高反射表面可能会对某些人造成困扰。与此同时，专业用户会对其丰富的色彩空间覆盖范围（几乎完全覆盖 AdobeRGB 和 DCI-P3）感到满意。
它的连接性也不落后于竞争对手，例如，它配备了 2x USB 4。这款笔记本的输入设备性能不错，但并不出众。它的外壳质量也差不多。与此同时，我们尚未测试的 Ryzen 5 8640U 在 CPU 基准测试和 iGPU 值（Radeon 760M）方面都有不错的表现。在扬声器音效、废气排放和电池寿命方面还有改进的余地，因为该设备的闲置耗电量出奇地高。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
价格方面，宏碁 Swift Edge 16 的不同配置差异很大，我们的测试配置通常售价在 1000 美元左右。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 81.3%  | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV AMD Ryzen 5 8640U ⎘ AMD Radeon 760M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1000 EUR | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED |
2. 88.6% v7 (old)  | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,029.99 List Price: 1300 USD | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED |
3. 77.3%  | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng AMD Ryzen 5 8540U ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $980.00 HP Pavilion Plus 16 inch Lap... List Price: 730 EUR | 1.7 kg | 18.6 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
4. 74.7%  | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Intel Core 7 150U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $609.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9... 2. $969.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9... 3. $969.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9... List Price: 800 USD | 1.8 kg | 16.9 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
5. 85.5% v7 (old)  | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U Intel Core i5-1335U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: $989.00 List Price: 780 USD | 1.8 kg | 19.85 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
Table of Contents
规格
案例
Swift Edge 16 的设计更加低调，由于尺寸（关键词：高度）较小，对于一款 16 英寸设备来说显得相当紧凑。它的表面既没有廉价感，也没有极高的品质感，整体上具有坚实的稳定性。我们对它的铰链也没有什么负面评价。Acer offspring 的重量为 1.24 千克，明显低于我们在本文中选择的竞争对手的设备。有关其外壳（及其内部结构）的更多信息，请参阅我们对外观相同的 前代机型Ryzen 7 7840U。
连接性
宏碁为其 16 英寸笔记本电脑配备了 4 个 USB 端口（2x Type-C 4（含 DisplayPort）和 2x Type-A 3.0）、一个音频插孔、一个 HDMI 2.1 输出口和一个 Kensington 锁开口。不幸的是，该设备集成的 microSD 读卡器只能达到 USB 2 的低速水平。联发科（MediaTek）的无线模块（RZ616）的情况要好一些，至少在接收数据时能达到很好的数值。
它的网络摄像头分辨率为 1,440p，明显高于大多数同类产品，以笔记本电脑的标准来看，它能提供相当清晰的图像--尽管在色彩准确度方面有些欠缺。该设备的附件是一个非常轻便小巧的 65 瓦电源适配器（USB-C）。宏碁不仅使用纸板作为包装材料，还使用了一些塑料。
SD 读卡器
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U (AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U (AV Pro V60) | |
交流
网络摄像头
输入设备
正如开头提到的，这款笔记本电脑的输入设备非常出色。它的键盘有白色背光（两个强度级别）和一个专用数字键盘，尽管它不得不使用较窄的按键和三列而不是四列。我们认为它的打字手感（反馈等）还不错。
触摸板大小适中，约为 12.5 x 8 厘米。其光滑的表面通常能做出精确的反应，并提供良好的滑动感。在我们的测试过程中，下边缘的点击区域触发可靠，但听起来比较不稳定。
显示屏
OLED 面板一直是一个品味问题。一方面，与 IPS 等其他类型的面板相比，OLED 拥有出色的对比度和丰富的黑色，但另一方面，敏感的用户可能难以忍受 OLED 的典型闪烁现象（在本例中为 120 至 240 Hz）。由于其表面反光，户外使用也可能成为一个问题，尽管其 400 cd/m² 左右的平均亮度还算不错。不过，它的亮点之一是色彩空间覆盖面大，没有任何不足之处。另一方面，游戏玩家会对其较短的响应时间感到满意。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 407 cd/m²
Contrast: 407000:1 (Black: 0.001 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.27 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89, calibrated: 2.17
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.231
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng CMN1640, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U R160NW41 R2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -51% | -51% | -50% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 41.6 -58% | 41.5 -58% | 42 -58% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 62.4 -38% | 61.2 -39% | 62.6 -37% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98 | 100 2% | 43 -56% | 42.9 -56% | 43.3 -56% |
| Response Times | -4% | -5471% | -3746% | -8000% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.4 ? | 0.57 ? -43% | 30.7 ? -7575% | 20.7 ? -5075% | 46.4 ? -11500% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 0.6 ? | 1 ? -67% | 20.8 ? -3367% | 15.1 ? -2417% | 27.6 ? -4500% |
| PWM Frequency | 120 ? | 238.8 99% | |||
| Screen | -7% | -2285% | -4213% | -3269% | |
| Brightness middle | 407 | 379.8 -7% | 324 -20% | 313.3 -23% | 318.6 -22% |
| Brightness | 405 | 383 -5% | 295 -27% | 308 -24% | 302 -25% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 98 0% | 88 -10% | 91 -7% | 91 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.001 | 0.2 -19900% | 0.37 -36900% | 0.29 -28900% | |
| Contrast | 407000 | 1620 -100% | 847 -100% | 1099 -100% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.27 | 4.7 -107% | 5.13 -126% | 8.42 -271% | 3.73 -64% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.46 | 7.51 -68% | 16.11 -261% | 19.09 -328% | 16.51 -270% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.17 | 0.55 75% | 2.99 -38% | 2.16 -0% | 2.03 6% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 0.8 65% | 4.24 -84% | 8.3 -261% | 3.2 -39% |
| Gamma | 2.231 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.3 96% | 2.83 78% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 6443 101% | 6381 102% | 7318 89% | 6296 103% | 6780 96% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
-4% | -2602% /
-2261% | -2670% /
-3254% | -3773% /
-3255% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8596 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
Swift Edge 16 的目标用户是那些寻求多功能便携设备的用户，这些设备适合典型的日常应用，如办公、视频和网络工作。(偶尔）游戏玩家不会对它的 Radeon 760M iGPU 感到非常满意，我们稍后就会看到。
测试条件
您可以通过制造商的 AcerSense 工具在 "安静"、"正常 "和 "性能 "配置文件之间进行选择。虽然其 TDP 和 CPU 性能没有或几乎没有差异，但 GPU 性能和噪音发展却存在偏差。除电池测试外，所有测量均使用性能配置文件进行。
| AcerSense 模式 | 静音 | 正常 | 性能 |
| 赛博朋克 2077 噪音 | 37 dB(A) | 41 dB(A) | 43 dB(A) |
| 赛博朋克 2077》性能（FHD/超高清） | 12.5fps | 14.1fps | 16.2fps |
| Cinebench R15 Multi Score | 1614 分 | 1639 分 | 1647 分 |
| CPU PL1 | 25 瓦 | 25 瓦 | 25 瓦 |
| CPU PL2 | 30 瓦 | 30 瓦 | 30 瓦 |
处理器
与其前代产品一样 Ryzen 5 7640U-的 Ryzen 5 8640U一样，Ryzen 5 8640U 包含六个内核，可通过 SMT 并行处理多达 12 个线程。此外，它还配备了 16 MB 三级缓存，并采用了 4 纳米制造工艺（Zen 4 架构）。就 Edge 16 而言，Ryzen 5 8640U 的速度与英特尔 酷睿 7 150U而 Ryzen 7 7840U则平均快 10%多一点。它的持续功率输出值得称赞（见 Cinebench 循环），这并不总是理所当然的事情。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (763 - 31245, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (4113 - 125394, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (287 - 5398, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (404 - 18321, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (2075 - 66922, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Office (78 - 1366, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (432 - 17834, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
系统性能
其系统性能也令人印象深刻。在 PCMark 10 中，新 Swift Edge 在对比设备中名列第二。这款笔记本电脑能轻松应对日常任务。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (2463 - 7578, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Office (2049 - 11108, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M (272 - 272, n=2) | |
| Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| Average of class Office (399 - 1966, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M (551 - 551, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6456 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Average of class Office (7.6 - 185.2, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
有些用户可能会对它有时极高的延迟感到不满，因为它的延迟比竞争对手要严重得多。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
美光公司的 512GB M.2 固态硬盘也并非尽善尽美。虽然它的读写速度一般都相当不错，但随着时间的推移，DiskSpd 循环有时会出现大幅下降。前代型号也出现了这种情况。在这方面，宏碁应该在散热上下功夫。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
迚ケ谿オ譎る俣 Radeon 760MiGPU 在市场上已有数年历史，其性能往往有目共睹。不过，在合成基准测试中，与竞争对手相比，情况仍然相对较好。在 3DMark 测试中，入门级机型几乎比 Radeon 740M或 Iris Xe Graphics G7高出近 40%。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 34649 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 9948 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 139754 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 26354 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6086 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2541 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在游戏测试中，情况就不那么乐观了。虽然前面提到的 iGPU 仍然落后，但差距明显缩小，Radeon 760M 的表现比我们之前确定的平均水平低了约 7%。虽然老游戏或要求不高的游戏，如 波斯王子：失落的王冠有时即使在更高分辨率和设置下也能流畅运行，但 16 英寸设备在运行当前或要求更高的游戏时却经常失败，如 潜行者 2在 1,920 x 1,080 像素和最低设置（甚至包括 FSR）下也无法运行。
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 760M (16.2 - 17.7, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (6.65 - 28.2, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average of class Office (7.96 - 28.9, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Radeon 760M (n=1) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
| Average AMD Radeon 760M (17.3 - 18.3, n=3) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (3.98 - 47.8, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 760M (28.9 - 33.2, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (4.35 - 50.5, n=43, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 760M (22.8 - 26, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (3.33 - 39.6, n=37, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average AMD Radeon 760M (17.8 - 19.1, n=2) | |
| Average of class Office (5.71 - 32.4, n=38, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 126.9 | 122.7 | 52.7 | 17.3 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 127.6 | 105.4 | 41.2 | 39 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 61.7 | 28.7 | 21.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 41.4 | 29.9 | 25.6 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 135.9 | 55.2 | 45.1 | 37.8 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 27.2 | 22.6 | 18.3 | 16.3 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 28.9 | 22.8 | 19.1 | 16.2 |
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 135.7 | 102.5 | 96.8 | |
| Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) | 13.3 | 10.5 | ||
| Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 7.15 | 5.71 | 4.5 | |
| Space Marine 2 (2024) | 14.3 | 10.6 | 10.1 | |
| Final Fantasy XVI (2024) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | |
| Until Dawn (2024) | 26.7 | 16.5 | 11 | |
| Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) | 36 | 33 | 20 | |
| Stalker 2 (2024) | 14.3 | 11 | 8.19 | |
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 16.6 | 0 () | ||
| Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 17.4 | 13.2 | 10.9 | |
| Civilization 7 (2025) | 62.6 | 34.8 | 14.5 |
另一个值得批评的地方是它在较长时间内的 3D 性能。在我们用 赛博朋克 2077的测试中，它的帧速率在一段时间后明显下降（对比图表）。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
排放量
噪音排放
它的噪音排放让人喜忧参半。只要 Swift Edge 16 只在静音模式下运行，它的两个机箱风扇就会相对安静。然而，从正常模式开始，16 英寸设备在负载情况下的噪音就变得非常明显，有时甚至会在空闲模式下发出不必要的轰鸣声，在性能模式下更是如此。在测试过程中，竞争对手的设备（更厚）更安静。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 26 / 29 / 39 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 45 / 45 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV R5 8640U, Radeon 760M | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 13% | 15% | 14% | 17% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 23.4 6% | 24 4% | 23 8% | 24.6 2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 26 | 24.1 7% | 24 8% | 23 12% | 24.6 5% |
| Idle Average * | 29 | 24.3 16% | 25 14% | 23 21% | 24.6 15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 39 | 28 28% | 26 33% | 23 41% | 24.6 37% |
| Load Average * | 45 | 41 9% | 38 16% | 43.3 4% | 32.7 27% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 43 | 37 14% | 40.8 5% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 45 | 40.9 9% | 39 13% | 40.9 9% | 39.2 13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.9 | 34.7 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
薄型设计对温度也有负面影响。在这种情况下，Swift Edge 16 在 3D 模式下的温度高于对比设备，机箱顶部最高温度为 48 °C，底部最高温度为 60 °C。在空闲模式下，情况要好一些--23 至 31 °C绰绰有余。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-5.4 °C / -9.7 F).
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV R5 8640U, Radeon 760M | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 7% | 14% | 17% | 9% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 48 | 41.6 13% | 42 12% | 35.4 26% | 44 8% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 60 | 46.6 22% | 44 27% | 33 45% | 50.4 16% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 30.4 -9% | 26 7% | 30.2 -8% | 27.2 3% |
| Idle Bottom * | 31 | 31 -0% | 28 10% | 30.2 3% | 27.8 10% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行的压力测试中，CPU 被大幅节流，平均温度略高于 60 °C。我们在赛博朋克测试中也测得了类似的温度值。
发言人
其 2.0 系统的音质一般。与往常一样，它在低音方面存在一些缺陷。如果要更频繁地欣赏媒体，应尽可能连接耳机或外置系统。
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电源管理
耗电量
在空闲模式下，它的功耗出奇地高。8 到 15 瓦的功耗与旧款 Swift Edge 16 相近，但竞争对手有时会节俭得多，这可能与笔记本电脑使用的显示技术等有关。另一方面，在负载情况下，这款 16 英寸设备并没有偏离正轨。
| Off / Standby | 1.1 / 3.8 Watt |
| Idle | 8 / 10 / 15 Watt |
| Load |
42 / 49 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV R5 8640U, Radeon 760M | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -6% | 26% | 9% | 12% | 16% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 8 | 7.1 11% | 4 50% | 3.3 59% | 4.9 39% | 4.51 ? 44% |
| Idle Average * | 10 | 10.1 -1% | 5 50% | 7.5 25% | 8.3 17% | 7.48 ? 25% |
| Idle Maximum * | 15 | 18.6 -24% | 6 60% | 7.8 48% | 8.6 43% | 9 ? 40% |
| Load Average * | 42 | 45.3 -8% | 40 5% | 56.9 -35% | 42.9 -2% | 42.5 ? -1% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 42.8 | 39.1 9% | 41.2 4% | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 44.4 | 43 3% | 48.7 -10% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 49 | 52.9 -8% | 46 6% | 62.4 -27% | 67 -37% | 62.2 ? -27% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.5 | 44.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
这款笔记本电脑的空闲耗电量高于平均水平，而电池容量仅为 54 瓦时（尽管竞争对手的电池容量仅为 47 至 59 瓦时），这两个因素的结合并不能确保其运行时间特别长。在亮度降低到约 150 cd/m² 的情况下，通过 WLAN 上网只需不到 5 个小时，这对于这样一款便携设备来说是相当糟糕的，也降低了它的整体评分。
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV R5 8640U, Radeon 760M, 54 Wh | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M, 59 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRU9 Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G1 Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 47 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 16% | 136% | 162% | 8% | 118% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 290 | 336 16% | 684 136% | 761 162% | 314 8% | 632 ? 118% |
| Reader / Idle | 1568 | 1315 ? | ||||
| Load | 94 | 114 ? |
Notebookcheck 总评分
宏碁 Swift Edge 16 是一款不错的轻型 16 英寸全能机，不过在电池续航时间方面还需要改进。
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV
- 02/25/2025 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
