宏碁Swift X 14 2023 OLED评测--配备RTX 4050的多媒体笔记本电脑仅在纸面上令人印象深刻
宏碁Swift X 14声称是一款快速的多媒体笔记本电脑,今年宏碁的设备已经得到了广泛的更新。它现在有一个更大的14.5英寸OLED屏幕,一个更快的英特尔H45系列的芯片作为笔记本电脑的处理器。旧的GeForce RTX 3050已经被一个新的RTX 4050笔记本电脑,与此同时,它使用更多的电力。
我们的测试设备带有Swift X SFX14-71G-77BA的名字,由宏基公司出售,价格约为1400美元。对于这个价格,你会得到一个120-Hz的OLED屏幕,它有2.8K的分辨率,英特尔的Core i7-13700H ,Nvidia的GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop,16GB内存和1TB NVMe SSD。另外,你可以购买带有32GB内存的设备,但这个版本会让你多花几百美元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Acer Swift X SFX14-71G i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.50" | 2880x1800 | |
90.2 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
89.2 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 R7 7735HS, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.4 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.8 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.3 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - Swift X 14采用新的铝制外壳
与去年的 Swift X 14,宏碁已经完全改造了它的外壳。铝制外壳的形状更直,总的来说,这台灰色的笔记本电脑看起来更脱胎换骨一些。当然,总有一些点缀--黑色的键盘和屏幕框架在颜色上与其他部分有一些不同。唯一令人讨厌的是底座上的所有赞助贴纸。机箱在两侧变细,导致整体外观更加纤细。边框也非常纤细,所以总的来说,该设备看起来相当现代。指纹痕迹在笔记本电脑的光滑表面上似乎不是一个大问题。
底部设备很好,很稳定--只有在键盘上施加相当大的压力才会使其轻微弯曲。盖子则更灵活一些,但由于它的OLED面板,屏幕没有显示图像错误。两个铰链都很好地完成了它们的工作--你可以用一只手轻松地打开笔记本电脑,它们可以有效地防止盖子晃动。其最大打开角度约为135度。
4毫米高,它的后脚比平均水平要高一点,这意味着笔记本的坐姿有一点角度。Swift X 14是所有对比设备中最厚的,其占地面积也是如此。它的重量约为1.53公斤,属于平均水平。其紧凑的100瓦电源的重量增加了365克,当你携带笔记本电脑时应该考虑到这一点。
连接性 - Wi-Fi 6E & Thunderbolt 4
笔记本电脑的连接选项包括一切重要的东西:通常的USB-A端口以及现代的USB-C连接,包括支持Thunderbolt 4。不过,我们无法通过USB-C端口将外部显示器连接到Swift X 14上--相反,我们不得不使用其HDMI端口。因此,它的Nvidia GPU一直处于活动状态,导致在日常使用中出现不必要的功耗增加。
SD卡阅读器
与其相比 前代产品,新的宏碁模型已经配备了一个microSD读卡器,使用我们的参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60)达到了80-85 MB/s的传输速率。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
沟通
安装了WLAN模块的杀手AX1675i负责无线网络连接,它已经支持现代6-GHz网络。使用我们来自华硕的参考路由器,传输速率很高而且很稳定。WLAN模块没有被焊接起来,如果需要,可以被换掉。
Networking | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
网络摄像头
在良好的照明条件下,1080p的网络摄像头仍然可以实现体面的照片。此外,还安装了一个红外模块,能够通过Windows Hello进行面部识别。
维护
底部的外壳由一排Torx螺钉(T5)固定,但这些螺钉可以很容易地被拆下。你必须小心,因为电池只由两个导针固定,所以它实际上是在机箱内松动。因此,你应该确保在设备平躺在桌子上时打开盖子。内存是焊接在一起的;M.2固态硬盘、WLAN模块以及风扇可以被访问。然而,上一代产品的第二个M.2插槽已经从这个设备上被砍掉。
输入设备--拥有出色键盘的雨燕
这款笔记本电脑的键盘与前代产品一样,具有精确和清晰的感觉--此外,其敲击噪音也很好,很安静。总的来说,这是一个很好的键盘,只有两个垂直方向键相当小。指纹扫描仪被集成在电源键上,它位于右上方,很容易与删除键混淆。在黑暗的照明条件下,你可以选择两个级别的白色背光。点击板(12.6 x 7.8厘米)工作得很好,它的点击有相当高质量的感觉,因为它们微妙而安静。
显示屏 - 120-Hz OLED
显示屏是这台笔记本电脑最大的变化之一,即14英寸的IPS面板在它的前代产品上发现了。 前辈已被一个更大的OLED面板取代,其对角线尺寸为14.5英寸。其分辨率为2880×1800像素,其表面确实相当反光。主观上,我们喜欢这块屏幕的外观;它显示出良好的对比度,颜色也显得漂亮而鲜艳。此外,它以120赫兹的高刷新率运行。
该显示屏的测量值在现代OLED面板的通常值范围内。它的SDR亮度约为390cd/m²,黑值为0,这导致了一个非常高的对比度。我们没有注意到OLED面板上有任何背光渗出,而且该显示器支持HDR--尽管这必须在设置中手动激活。在描绘包含少量光内容的特定图像时,屏幕可以描绘出高达610 cd/m²的亮度水平,当笔记本电脑显示完全白色的屏幕时,它可以达到480 cd/m²的数值。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 388 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.9
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G ATNA45AF03-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 LEN145-3K, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 LEN89C1, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Samsung SDC4192 (ATNA40YK14-0), OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti MNE007ZA1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 NV140DRM-N62, IPS-LED, 2240x1400, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -3% | -17% | -3% | -17% | -19% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 98.7 -1% | 72.9 -27% | 99.8 0% | 74.1 -26% | 70.21 -30% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 98.2 -2% | 100 0% | 97.4 -3% | 99.04 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 96.2 | 87.6 -9% | 74.6 -22% | 88.7 -8% | 75.3 -22% | 72.59 -25% |
Response Times | -5154% | -5484% | -258% | -5046% | -7400% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.4 ? | 31.5 ? -7775% | 31.8 ? -7850% | 2.4 ? -500% | 31.5 ? -7775% | 42 ? -10400% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.6 ? | 15.8 ? -2533% | 19.3 ? -3117% | 2.4 ? -300% | 14.5 ? -2317% | 27 ? -4400% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 300 25% | ||||
Screen | 39% | -43% | 36% | -43% | -35% | |
Brightness middle | 388 | 441 14% | 344.7 -11% | 423 9% | 421 9% | 344 -11% |
Brightness | 390 | 453 16% | 334 -14% | 427 9% | 416 7% | 330 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 92 -6% | 92 -6% | 98 0% | 89 -9% | 81 -17% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.31 | 0.1 | 0.28 | 0.21 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 0.6 73% | 3.01 -37% | 0.55 75% | 3.2 -45% | 2.39 -9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.9 | 1.3 67% | 6.3 -62% | 1.15 71% | 5.5 -41% | 5.24 -34% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.9 | 0.6 68% | 0.83 56% | 1.15 39% | 2 -5% | 0.99 48% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 0.8 43% | 4.6 -229% | 0.69 51% | 4.4 -214% | 4.31 -208% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.2 100% | 2.28 96% | 2.42 91% | 2.22 99% | 2.46 89% |
CCT | 6380 102% | 6597 99% | 6420 101% | 6479 100% | 6384 102% | 6573 99% |
Contrast | 1297 | 1112 | 4230 | 1504 | 1638 | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1706% /
-837% | -1848% /
-943% | -75% /
-41% | -1702% /
-870% | -2485% /
-1259% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro2)对面板进行了测量,其描述在交付状态下已经很好,没有色差。然而,与P3参考色彩空间相比,有几种颜色高于3的重要偏差值。宏碁没有提供任何带有额外配置文件的软件,即使在我们校准之后(我们可以通过校准来改善色彩描述),某些颜色的偏差值仍然高于3。加上完整的P3覆盖,仍然可以在这台笔记本电脑上编辑图像,但它的色彩描述远非完美。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3 ms rise | |
↘ 0.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.2 ms rise | |
↘ 0.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
三星OLED面板受到频率为240赫兹的PWM的影响--然而,在40-100%的亮度范围内,宏碁利用了一种称为直流调光的功能,这使得闪烁的干扰减少了很多。你必须考虑到在屏幕亮度低于40%的情况下,可能会出现有害的PWM。在撰写本文时,目前还没有软件解决方案可以减轻PWM的影响,例如,在某些华硕产品中可以看到。
在外面,新的Swift X 14的表现要比它的前辈的哑光IPS面板差很多。即使在多云的日子里,强烈镜像的OLED显示屏上的反射也往往是一个问题。它的视角稳定性很好;只有极端角度才会导致OLED屏幕上常见的蓝雾。
性能 - 猛禽湖H和RTX 4050笔记本电脑
测试条件
宏碁提供各种性能配置(静音、正常、性能、涡轮),你可以通过组合键Fn+F或通过快速启动软件来选择。然而,必须指出的是,你必须首先知道这个软件的存在--据推测,大多数人根本就不会利用它。我们使用性能模式进行基准测试和测量,因为它构成了性能和噪音排放之间的最佳折衷。
处理器 - 酷睿i7-13700H
除了更新到英特尔当前的猛禽湖处理器外,宏碁还采取了进一步的措施:新版本的Swift X 14没有使用旧型号中的P芯片,而是使用了45瓦的处理器酷睿i7-13700H.这款处理器具有两个额外的性能核心,然而,它的冷却有时有点不堪重负,笔记本电脑只能在短时间内保持在80瓦的最大TDP。过了一会儿,其消耗量下降到40瓦,在后来的过程中,它有时只消耗20瓦。总的来说,新的Swift X 14在连续负荷下只比它的前辈快一点,而它的竞争对手在这方面也做得更好。当然,它的酷睿i7-13700H在短时间内的负载是很快的,但这对它的冷却装置造成了损失。
在电池使用中,该处理器最多允许消耗29瓦,这就是为什么它的多核性能要差30%左右。进一步的CPU基准测试可以在这里.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=104, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (5890 - 20034, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1323 - 1914, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=95, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2322 - 7674, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11924, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (508 - 741, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 5224, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (905 - 2982, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (213 - 278, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (100 - 502, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (169 - 555, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 130368, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (27322 - 76344, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4825 - 6238, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6165 - 14215, n=28) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1362 - 1919, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6.72 - 21.2, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 34.3, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (31.3 - 62.4, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (0.4308 - 0.607, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 50388, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4986 - 18908, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 201874, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (25360 - 92359, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 8623, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1339 - 4224, n=28) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (68763 - 107159, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 181505, n=78, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4800 - 11050, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 105740, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12321 - 45118, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (28769 - 151254, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 2022, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (389 - 1215, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 26875, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2540 - 10135, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12872 - 52727, n=28) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
系统性能
主观上,Swift X 14的性能非常好,由于其快速的组件,这并不是一个很大的惊喜。公平地说,你必须注意到,几乎任何现代多媒体笔记本电脑都可以这样说,在日常使用中,你很可能无法注意到每个型号之间有那么大的差异。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (6822 - 7556, n=7) | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=73, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (10283 - 11549, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=73, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (8368 - 9836, n=7) | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=73, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (9527 - 10643, n=7) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1205 - 1937, n=9) | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=91, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1158 - 1877, n=9) | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=91, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1293 - 2044, n=9) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1097 - 1929, n=9) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 |
PCMark 10 Score | 7271 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (24334 - 78081, n=28) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (23681 - 79656, n=28) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (22986 - 99898, n=28) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (82.4 - 136.8, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
在我们的标准化延迟测试中(网页浏览、YouTube 4K播放、CPU负载),测试设备在目前的BIOS版本下显示出强烈的限制,这就是为什么Swift X 14不适合使用这种形式的实时音频应用。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
宏碁已经安装了一个快速的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘--我们测试设备中的这个是由三星制造的。PM9A1(980 Pro的OEM版本)的存储容量为1TB,其中约900GB在首次启动后仍可自由使用。其超过6GB/s的传输率非常好,在连续负载时,其性能确实大幅下降(有时会降至500MB/s以下),这在大型复制任务中会产生很大的差异。一个稍慢的PCIe 3.0固态硬盘--但可以保持低温的--会是一个更好的解决方案。更多的SSD基准测试可以在这里.
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
正如我们在介绍中提到的,宏碁已经换掉了去年的GeForce RTX 3050换成了新的GeForce RTX 4050笔记本电脑,即45瓦的版本。在涡轮模式下,GPU的消耗量高达50瓦。它在GPU基准测试中表现非常好,Swift X 14甚至能够将自己置于其直接的多媒体竞争对手RTX 4050 Laptop之前。在GPU可以获得更多电力的游戏笔记本电脑中,RTX 4050笔记本电脑的表现要好得多。即便如此,这些结果对于这类设备和其前身中的老款RTX 3050型号来说是很好的,而RTX 3050 Ti中的Schenker Vision 14,显然被打败了。
与其处理器和固态硬盘相比,GPU在连续负载下似乎也没有任何性能问题,它轻松地通过了Time Spy 压力测试,结果为98.6 %。在电池使用中,GPU最大消耗40瓦,这似乎对其性能水平没有太大影响(-6 %)。进一步的GPU基准测试可以在我们的技术部分找到 。
3DMark 11 Performance | 18899 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15696 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 6062 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (19 - 105, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (25 - 37, n=37) |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 181, n=48, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (47 - 175, n=37) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (160 - 946, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (243 - 907, n=37) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
作为一台多媒体笔记本电脑,这当然包括Swift X 14运行游戏的能力--总的来说,这似乎工作得很好。根据不同的游戏,CPU的性能被扼杀的速度确实变得相当明显,例如在《远征5》中。总的来说,你可以在Swift X 14上以高/最大的细节流畅地玩目前的游戏,然而,它的直接多媒体竞争对手,如Yoga Pro 7或Aero 14 OLED尽管它们的PGU性能理论上较低,但在这方面做得略好。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 141.6, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=82, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 161.4 | 143.6 | 60.6 | 46.5 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 309 | 219 | 123 | 59.5 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 175 | 157.8 | 139.8 | 123.9 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 123.3 | 85.7 | 65.1 | 47.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 114.4 | 84 | 70.7 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 73 | 51 | 50 | 47 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 326 | 167.9 | 134.9 | 117 | 78 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 132.5 | 119.7 | 111.5 | 70.7 | 56.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 85 | 56 | 52 | 50 | 30 |
F1 22 (2022) | 100.9 | 101.8 | 94.4 | 40.7 | 25.1 |
排放物 - 恼人的风扇在日常使用中会引起骚动
噪声排放
它的冷却系统是Swift X 14的明显弱点,因为它的单风扇甚至在笔记本空闲时也在运转。只有在静音模式下,当笔记本空闲时,风扇才会关闭,但只要你做任何事情,它就会再次开始旋转。使用所有其他模式时,风扇一直处于活动状态--无论是在空闲模式还是尝试最简单的任务。在28-32 dB(A),你不能忽视它。在负载情况下,Swift X 14变得非常响亮,在50 dB(A),它是我们比较的所有设备中最响亮的设备之一;在压力测试中,它甚至达到了52 dB(A)。我们没有注意到任何电子噪音。
能源概况 | 3DMark 06 | Witcher 3 | 压力测试 |
---|---|---|---|
静音 | 32.2 dB(A) | 39.5 dB(A) | 45.2 dB(A) |
正常 | 35.2 dB(A) | 50 dB(A) | 52.2 dB(A) |
性能 | 38.2 dB(A) | 50 dB(A) | 52.2 dB(A) |
Turbo | 41.5 dB(A) | 52.2 dB(A) | 52.2 dB(A) |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 28.2 / 31.8 / 31.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 38.2 / 52.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.8 dB(A) |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-1240P, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 6% | 13% | 9% | 7% | 2% | |
off / environment * | 24.8 | 22.9 8% | 22.7 8% | 24 3% | 24.4 2% | 25 -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 28.2 | 22.9 19% | 22.8 19% | 24 15% | 24.4 13% | 26.6 6% |
Idle Average * | 31.8 | 22.9 28% | 22.8 28% | 24 25% | 24.4 23% | 26.6 16% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.8 | 36.8 -16% | 22.8 28% | 35.71 -12% | 27.8 13% | 27.5 14% |
Load Average * | 38.2 | 43.7 -14% | 43.8 -15% | 43.3 -13% | 49.7 -30% | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 | 46.2 8% | 43.8 12% | 40.22 20% | 48.2 4% | |
Load Maximum * | 52.2 | 46.2 11% | 47.1 10% | 51.93 1% | 48.8 7% | 49.7 5% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
尽管在日常使用中,由于其持续的风扇活动,它不会与任何增加的表面温度作斗争,但在负载或玩游戏时,你确实开始注意到散热器达到其极限。主要是机箱的中间和左边发热;我们在键盘上测量了超过45℃的温度,包括非常重要的WASD区域。在游戏时你肯定会注意到这一点,而且长时间使用后很容易让人感到不舒服。在底部,我们甚至测量到了约50℃的峰值。在压力测试中,GPU显然被优先考虑,以恒定的45瓦运行,而处理器则迅速被节流到20瓦。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.8 °C / 91 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 Intel Core i5-1240P, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -2% | 6% | 1% | -9% | -21% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 46.4 | 41.6 10% | 42.2 9% | 42 9% | 48.4 -4% | 49.8 -7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 49 | 55.7 -14% | 49 -0% | 52 -6% | 57.1 -17% | 51 -4% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.5 | 25.9 2% | 24.4 8% | 26 2% | 28.1 -6% | 39.6 -49% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.6 | 28 -5% | 25.2 5% | 27 -2% | 29 -9% | 32.7 -23% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
除了其冷却系统,该笔记本电脑的扬声器是另一个明显的弱点。总的来说,它们的声音非常空洞,而且不是特别响亮。对于一台价格在1400美元左右的现代多媒体笔记本电脑来说,这根本不够。反正你在玩游戏的时候必须使用耳机,因为风扇的声音太大,但即使你只是看电影或听音乐,集成模块也几乎不适合使用。
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理--新雨燕的耐力大大降低
消耗功率
由于Swift X 14的OLED面板,其功耗在很大程度上取决于屏幕上描绘的内容。在其描绘的深色标准背景下,其闲置值实际上并不都是坏事。特别是浅色图片(通常是网页)导致了更高的消耗。在HDR模式下,我们测得的功率高达27瓦。在负载情况下,我们注意到最大的104瓦,这意味着电源被推向了它的极限--但消耗量又迅速下降,在压力测试过程中,它甚至达到了90瓦左右。因此,我们可以说,所提供的电源适配器是足够的。关机时,笔记本电脑的功耗约为0.58瓦,有点偏高。
Off / Standby | 0.58 / 0.68 Watt |
Idle | 8.4 / 11.5 / 11.9 Watt |
Load |
84.9 / 104.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 R7 7735HS, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, IPS-LED, 2240x1400, 14" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -13% | -5% | 11% | 2% | 12% | -37% | 1% | |
Idle Minimum * | 8.4 | 7.6 10% | 7.6 10% | 7.4 12% | 7.5 11% | 7.3 13% | 9.84 ? -17% | 6.83 ? 19% |
Idle Average * | 11.5 | 13.3 -16% | 12.2 -6% | 8.3 28% | 10.4 10% | 8.3 28% | 14.8 ? -29% | 11.6 ? -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.9 | 13.7 -15% | 12.8 -8% | 8.7 27% | 11.4 4% | 13.1 -10% | 19.1 ? -61% | 13.7 ? -15% |
Load Average * | 84.9 | 88.2 -4% | 76.5 10% | 76 10% | 83.3 2% | 70 18% | 87.9 ? -4% | 71.9 ? 15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 83.6 | 94.2 -13% | 89.5 -7% | 70 16% | 92.7 -11% | 70.2 16% | ||
Load Maximum * | 104.2 | 143 -37% | 135.7 -30% | 132 -27% | 110.3 -6% | 95 9% | 179.6 ? -72% | 118.5 ? -14% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
它的电池容量可能从58.7Wh上升到76Wh,但它的运行时间比去年的型号差很多。如果你没有插座,那么你需要确保切换到60赫兹模式,因为使用120赫兹会导致更长的运行时间。在适应150cd/m²的亮度下(在我们的测试设备上,这是其最大SDR亮度的59%),我们的WLAN测试只持续了7.5小时多一点(在120赫兹~7小时),这意味着比其前辈少了3小时。使用全亮度时,其WLAN运行时间降至6小时左右(或使用120赫兹时5:15小时)。只有视频测试的结果是9.5小时的体面运行时间。
如果你在全亮度下观看HDR视频,那么你可以预期运行时间为4小时左右。给设备完全充电大约需要100分钟,56分钟后可使用其80%的容量。
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 R7 7735HS, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 63 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh | Acer Swift X SFX14-51G-5876 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 58.7 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 28% | 36% | 68% | 89% | 63% | 78% | |
H.264 | 571 | 742 30% | 666 17% | 739 29% | 847 ? 48% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 462 | 595 29% | 628 36% | 457 -1% | 607 31% | 643 39% | 638 ? 38% |
Load | 39 | 49 26% | 92 136% | 124 218% | 86 121% | 97.1 ? 149% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - Swift X 14因其风扇而失败
宏碁给他们的Swift X 14进行了一次大的更新,包括更强大的硬件,然而,该设备仍然只有一个风扇作为其冷却装置。该RTX 4050笔记本电脑的GPU性能良好且稳定,但其新的H系列处理器只能在短时间内表现出色,然后回落到去年的标准。Swift X 14配备酷睿i5 1240P的标准。当然,在数据表上,酷睿i7-13700H看起来要好得多,在许多(短暂的)基准测试中,它的性能也更好--但这在日常使用中不会带来什么。由于其80瓦的高功率限制(在所有能源模式下),笔记本电脑很快就会大幅升温,导致风扇活动增加。三星的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘也是如此--一个更冷的PCIe 3.0型号会是一个更好的选择。
改变显示器也给笔记本带来了很大的变化。从主观上讲,120赫兹的OLED面板的画质当然很好,但由于其反射表面,旧的Swift X 14的哑光IPS面板更适合在户外工作。此外,你不能忽视它的PWM闪烁。尽管直流调光在较高的显示亮度下有帮助,但这只在40%以下起作用--任何低于这个数值的都会受到通常的有害的PWM闪烁的影响。华硕目前没有提供任何软件解决方案来帮助缓解这个问题。
快速的组件并不自动等同于一个好的整体包装:在规格表上,新的宏碁Swift X 14似乎是一个伟大的设备,但在实践中,由于笔记本电脑的新OLED面板导致的风扇和短暂的运行时间确实相当令人讨厌。
问题的真正症结在于它的冷却系统,它继续只依赖一个风扇。除了CPU和SSD的性能下降之外,持续的风扇噪音在日常使用中也变得令人难以置信的嘈杂。自从我们上次评测具有这种水平的风扇管理不足的笔记本电脑以来,已经有相当一段时间了。除此以外,我们还希望看到笔记本电脑的能源概况有更大的分布。如果其CPU仍然使用高达80瓦的功率,最终导致极高的温度和更高的风扇活动,那么安静模式有什么用呢?
Swift X 14很快让人明白,快速的单个组件并不自动意味着一个好的整体包装。考虑到其良好的竞争对手,如联想Yoga Pro 7 14(得益于其无PWM的IPS面板)和Gigabyte Aero 14,我们发现更难推荐新的Swift X 14。此外,我们目前还在测试MSI Stealth 14 Studio此外,新更新的斯肯克视觉14可能很快就会上市。
价格和可用性
新的宏碁Swift X 14目前在美国还不能在线购买,但是你将能够在宏碁的网站上找到它。一旦有了。它的零售价约为1,400美元。
另外,你可以在亚马逊上找到去年的机型,价格为1099.99美元。
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G
- 07/04/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.