Teclast P26T 评测--关于这款经济型平板电脑众说纷纭

Name: Teclast P26T
Brand: Teclast

负担得起还是已经太便宜了？

100 欧元（约合 108 美元）的平板电脑，这能行得通吗？面对众多经济实惠的竞争对手，我们肯定能给出肯定的答案。但对于 Teclast P26T 而言，尽管价格实惠，但几个缺点的组合让我们怀疑这款 10.1 英寸平板电脑是否划算。我们的测试表明，对于哪些人来说，这款产品仍然值得购买。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 02/02/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Tablet Touchscreen

中国制造商 Teclast 推出的 P26T 是一款价格非常实惠的Android 平板电脑。这款 10.1 英寸平板电脑的官方售价为 100 美元，在亚马逊等网站（德国）上的售价甚至低于 100 欧元。

对于经济型平板电脑来说，性能、电池寿命和显示屏方面的一些限制往往是必然的。但乍一看，Teclast P26T 提供了相当可靠的设备，它配备了Android 13、Allwinner A523、Teclast P26T 和 Teclast P26T。全志 A523八核 SoC、4 GB 内存、128 GB 存储空间、IPS 面板和 6000 毫安时电池。我们的测试显示了 Teclast P26T 的实际能力，以及它可能适合哪些人使用。

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Teclast P26T

Processor

Allwinner A523 8 x 0.5 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP1

Memory

4 GB

Display

10.10 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 149 PPI, 10 point multitouch, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB

, 109 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm headphone jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Sensors: accelerometer, hall, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Limited, Wi-Fi Direct

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 10.2 x 245.8 x 153.4

Battery

6000 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 5 MPix LED Flash
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 10W charger (5V/2A), USB cable, protective case, quick start guide, warranty card, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

511 g, Power Supply: 42 g

Price

100 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
75.2 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2024	Teclast P26T A523, Mali-G57 MP1	511 g	10.2 mm	10.10"	1280x800
80.4 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Blackview Tab 80 T7200, Mali-G57 MP1	484 g	7.5 mm	10.10"	1280x800
80 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 T610, Mali-G52 MP2	460 g	8.5 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
79.4 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Teclast M50 HD T7200, Mali-G57 MP1	435 g	8 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
81.2 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2	477 g	7 mm	10.40"	2000x1200
83.5 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE SD 680, Adreno 610	481 g	7.36 mm	11.00"	1920x1200

外壳 - 蓝色塑料，带波浪图案

Teclast P26T 的重量为 511 克（约 18 盎司），略高于价格相近的同类设备，例如联想 Tab M10 Gen 3.显示屏边框并不小，短边为 1.4 厘米（约 0.55 英寸），长边为 0.8 厘米（约 0.31 英寸），但它们有助于避免在触摸屏上意外输入。Teclast 为自拍摄像头选择了一个不同寻常的位置，它位于显示屏左侧顶部下方。

亮蓝色后盖是 Teclast P26T 最突出的设计特点。磨砂后盖采用波浪形纹理，可根据不同的视角反射不同的光线，看起来相当美观。波浪形纹理可以清晰地感觉到，也使握持更加安全。Teclast 没有提供其他颜色版本。

P26T 没有通过 IP 认证，因此没有特别的防尘或防水功能。平板电脑在尝试扭动时会发出吱吱嘎嘎的声音。IPS 面板也不能很好地应对一些较强的压力，会产生一些图像伪影。但总的来说，P26T 给人的印象相当稳定，做工也不错。

尺寸比较

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Teclast P26T Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Blackview Tab 80 Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Teclast M50 HD DIN A5 ❌

设备 - Teclast P26T 的存储空间很大

Teclast P26T 拥有 4 GB 内存和 128 GB 存储空间，考虑到其价格，它提供了相当可靠的存储设备。制造商甚至提到了最高 8GB 的内存，不过这只能通过交换到闪存中的文件来实现，而闪存的运行速度要比内存慢得多。

实际上，"可扩展内存 "功能几乎没有任何意义，只有在仍有足够存储空间的情况下才能使用。在新配置的 P26T 中，存储空间为 109 GB。如果关闭默认激活的内存扩展功能，则可再增加 4 GB。

Teclast 平板电脑的 USB-C 端口以 USB-2.0 的速度运行，支持 USB-OTG，可以连接外部存储介质等。您还可以使用 microSD 插槽扩展存储空间，该插槽位于机身左侧，可接受最大 1 TB 的存储卡。此外，还有一个专用的 3.5 毫米音频接口用于音频输出。P26T 不支持 NFC。

microSD 读卡器

在使用我们的 Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD 参考卡时，读卡器只能达到 25.3 MB/s 的相当低的传输速度，但这在同价位产品中并不罕见。

在连续读写时，microSD 读卡器的运行速度更慢。最高分别为 56.6 和 37.1 MB/s，不仅与 Angelbird AV Pro V60 的性能相去甚远，而且还被几款对比设备的读卡器所超越，例如

三星Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022为例。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	35.2 MB/s +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	28.92 MB/s +14%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	26.6 MB/s +5%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	25.3 MB/s
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	21.3 MB/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	20.9 MB/s -17%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø28.8 (20.9-37.1)

Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.2 (18.7-44.8)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34 (17.4-45.3)

Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.1 (30.7-46.7)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.5 (12.9-44.1)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.7 (21.9-44.3)

Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø49.1 (29.5-56.4)

Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø77 (38.6-86.6)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.3 (43.6-81.3)

Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.2 (41.4-81.8)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.6 (44.2-82)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø64.6 (36.3-77.6)

软件 - PureAndroid 13 和 DRM Widevine L1

这款来自 Teclast 的经济型平板电脑包含Android 13，没有添加任何来自第三方厂商的广告应用程序，因此可以有效利用存储空间。制造商也没有对Android 用户界面做任何改动，因此买家不必习惯新的用户界面。此外，高清流媒体还支持 DRM Widevine L1。

在 1 月底进行本次测试时，Teclast P26T 收到了 V1.07.20240102 版本的系统更新，使其Android 安全补丁达到了 2023 年 11 月 5 日的水平。因此，尽管获得了最新的软件更新，它们仍然不是很新。Teclast 没有说明该平板电脑将在多长时间内收到安全更新，更新间隔是多久，也没有说明该平板电脑是否会收到任何操作系统更新。当我们询问更多信息时，Teclast 也没有做出回应。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Wi-Fi 5 连接问题严重

Teclast P26T 使用蓝牙 5.2 和 Wi-Fi 5 进行无线通信。当连接到华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器时，平板电脑的最高传输速度仅为 184 Mb/s。传输速率差异也很大，有时甚至完全无法接收。

我们还多次遇到 GT-AXE11000 的连接问题，这些问题在日常操作中非常明显。我们测试的其他路由器也出现了同样的问题。例如，P26T 无法识别 Fritzbox 7490 路由器的 5 GHz 网络，只有在我们选择 2.4 GHz 频段后才能与其建立连接。另一方面，重启后平板电脑又能顺利识别路由器的 5 GHz 频段。

由于 Teclast P26T 没有 GPS 模块，因此不适合用于导航任务。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	319 (310^min - 325^max) MBit/s +354%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	317 (251^min - 326^max) MBit/s +351%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	307 (284^min - 322^max) MBit/s +337%
Teclast M50 HD	305 (259^min - 319^max) MBit/s +334%
Teclast P26T	70.3 (2^min - 157^max) MBit/s
Blackview Tab 80	44.1 (27^min - 57^max) MBit/s -37%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	369 (179^min - 379^max) MBit/s +198%
Teclast M50 HD	358 (336^min - 370^max) MBit/s +189%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	351 (333^min - 366^max) MBit/s +183%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	218 (172^min - 258^max) MBit/s +76%
Teclast P26T	124 (99^min - 184^max) MBit/s
Blackview Tab 80	47.8 (32^min - 60^max) MBit/s -61%

Teclast P26T Allwinner A523, ARM Mali-G57 MP1; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø72.7 (2-157)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø317 (251-326)

Teclast P26T Allwinner A523, ARM Mali-G57 MP1; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø124.1 (99-184)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø218 (172-258)

摄像头 - 500 万像素主摄像头，图像模糊

在大多数情况下，你不可能对经济型平板电脑的摄像头模块寄予厚望。Teclast P26T 也是如此。它的自拍摄像头只有 2 百万像素的分辨率，即使在光线良好的条件下，照片也不是很清晰或明亮。

尽管自拍摄像头的成像质量基本满足视频聊天的要求，但你也必须愿意接受一些妥协。要使用自拍摄像头，应纵向握持 P26T。由于摄像头位于显示屏的左侧，因此只有在横向握持平板电脑时才能看到自己。这可能会让人感到不舒服，尤其是在长时间视频聊天时。

主摄像头分辨率为 500 万像素，配有 LED 闪光灯。位于下方的第二个镜头看起来完全一样，但只用作深度传感器。它的分辨率为 0.3 百万像素，可收集用于模糊效果的额外信息。

由于主摄像头明显缺乏一定的锐度，所以模糊也可以用来描述图像质量。图像整体显得苍白，经常出现色彩边缘或斑点区域。另一方面，色彩还原显得很自然。500 万像素摄像头在光线较弱的情况下完全失灵，只能拍出暗淡和模糊的照片。

主摄像头能以每秒 30 帧的速度录制最高分辨率为 1080p 的视频。但是，由于图像苍白模糊，录制的视频几乎无法使用。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1 Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2 Lowlight-Aufnahme

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

我们再次详细查看了主摄像头在可控光线条件下的表现。但结果并没有显示出任何改进。即使在最佳光照条件下，拍摄的照片也很模糊，而在仅有 1 Lux 的剩余光照条件下，测试图中再也看不到任何东西。

ColorChecker Teclast P26T: 9.86 ∆E min: 3.47 - max: 16.63 ∆E

附件和保修 - 含对开盖

Teclast P26T 的包装盒包括一个 10 瓦充电器（5V/2A）、一条 USB 数据线、一个对开式外壳和一些简要说明。盒内没有附带 SIM 卡工具，但您不需要，因为 microSD 插槽没有盖子，可以直接插入。

Teclast 为 P26T 提供 12 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 2D 人脸识别需要大量光线

Teclast P26T 的 16:10 触摸屏执行输入相对较快。但在操作过程中，你很快就会发现全志 A523并非性能冠军。尽管平板电脑拥有 4 GB 内存，但在日常操作中还是会反复出现小延迟和等待时间。有时，你还需要第二次点击某些项目才能得到响应。在 60Hz 的刷新率下，滚动手势和其他动画显得不流畅。

要解锁平板电脑，除了图案、PIN 码或密码外，还可以使用自拍摄像头进行 2D 人脸识别。不过，这只有在周围光线充足的情况下才能快速可靠地实现。在我们的测试中，即使在光线稍暗的房间里，比如窗帘拉下时，摄像头也无法再识别我们。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 深色色调的 IPS 面板

Teclast P26T 的 IPS 面板分辨率为 1280x800 像素，在经济型产品中属于较低水平。这导致 16:10 显示屏的像素密度仅为 140 PPI，屏幕清晰度不高。显示屏不支持 HDR。

在其余显示参数方面，Teclast 平板电脑与目前同价位的设备相比也处于下风。在白色背景下，IPS 面板的最大亮度可达 262 cd/m²，而在图像明暗区域分布均匀的情况下（APL18 测量），最大亮度为 258 cd/m²。一些竞争对手（如Blackview Tab 80 ）的这一数值要高得多。

620:1 的微弱对比度使图像内容显得不是很生动。此外，色彩明显偏蓝，这进一步加深了血色图像的印象。另一方面，即使在很低的亮度设置下，P26T 也没有使用脉宽调制（PWM），因此即使对 PWM 非常敏感的用户也非常适合使用 P26T。


262 cd/m²	242 cd/m²	211 cd/m²
245 cd/m²	248 cd/m²	219 cd/m²
241 cd/m²	239 cd/m²	219 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 262 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 236.2 cd/m² Minimum: 27.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 248 cd/m²
Contrast: 620:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.62 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 10.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.438

	Teclast P26T IPS, 1280x800, 10.1"	Blackview Tab 80 LCD, 1280x800, 10.1"	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Teclast M50 HD IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"
Screen		48%	36%	13%	20%	74%
Brightness middle	248	425 71%	343 38%	246 -1%	322 30%	473 91%
Brightness	236	423 79%	332 41%	227 -4%	303 28%	449 90%
Brightness Distribution	81	83 2%	94 16%	88 9%	89 10%	85 5%
Black Level *	0.4	0.4 -0%	0.31 22%	0.33 17%	0.45 -13%	0.28 30%
Contrast	620	1063 71%	1106 78%	745 20%	716 15%	1689 172%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	8.62	5.11 41%	5.9 32%	6.28 27%	7.02 19%	3 65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	17.81	9.8 45%	11.2 37%	14.1 21%	10.38 42%	6 66%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	10.1	2.8 72%	7.9 22%	8.8 13%	7.1 30%	2.7 73%
Gamma	2.438 ^90%	2.183 ^101%	2.184 ^101%	2.277 ^97%	2.179 ^101%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	10183 ^64%	7136 ^91%	9198 ^71%	8024 ^81%	8730 ^74%	6589 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

我们使用 Calman 分析软件和光谱光度计进行的测试表明，IPS 面板再现的色彩非常失真，尤其是过度使用蓝色和绿色色调。此外，色彩空间的整体覆盖率也很低。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.6 ms rise
25.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.1 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 33.7 ms rise
60.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

由于其 IPS 面板亮度较低，Teclast P26T 几乎不适合在户外使用。即使在一月份阴霾的天空下，也很难看到显示屏上的内容。这意味着在夏天的阴凉处阅读屏幕内容会更加困难。显示屏的可视角度比较稳定。

性能 - 全志 SoC，性能储备很少

全志全志 A523处理器保证了 Teclast P26T 的正常运行。这款入门级八核 SoC 采用两个四核集群，每个集群由 4 个 Cortex-A55 内核组成。速度较快的四核集群的运行时钟频率高达 1.8 GHz，而第二个四核集群的运行时钟频率则高达 1.4 GHz。全志 A523 配备了 ARM Mali-G57 MC1作为图形处理器。

日常运行中的表现也得到了基准测试的证实：全志 A523 的性能并不强劲。八核 SoC 使 P26T 成为了一款速度低于平均水平的平板电脑，即使从预算标准来看也是如此。不过，如果您对这款 10.1 英寸平板电脑的负载不是很高，并使用要求很高的应用程序，那么在大多数情况下，一切运行速度都会令人满意。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=70, last 2 years)	712 Points +326%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	384 Points +130%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	373 Points +123%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	346 Points +107%
Blackview Tab 80	309 Points +85%
Teclast M50 HD	305 Points +83%
Average Allwinner A523 (167 - 171, n=2)	169 Points +1%
Teclast P26T	167 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=70, last 2 years)	2508 Points +222%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1684 Points +116%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	1345 Points +73%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1267 Points +63%
Blackview Tab 80	1245 Points +60%
Teclast M50 HD	1191 Points +53%
Average Allwinner A523 (778 - 815, n=2)	797 Points +2%
Teclast P26T	778 Points

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=69, last 2 years)	1121 Points +394%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	413 Points +82%
Blackview Tab 80	377 Points +66%
Teclast M50 HD	372 Points +64%
Average Allwinner A523 (227 - 231, n=2)	229 Points +1%
Teclast P26T	227 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=69, last 2 years)	3575 Points +319%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1439 Points +69%
Teclast M50 HD	1392 Points +63%
Blackview Tab 80	1298 Points +52%
Teclast P26T	854 Points
Average Allwinner A523 (852 - 854, n=2)	853 Points 0%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=48, last 2 years)	469872 Points +271%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	213115 Points +68%
Teclast M50 HD	202973 Points +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	201810 Points +59%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	199786 Points +58%
Average Allwinner A523 (126757 - 136065, n=2)	131411 Points +4%
Teclast P26T	126757 Points

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=72, last 2 years)	9873 Points +89%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	7404 Points +42%
Teclast M50 HD	7259 Points +39%
Blackview Tab 80	7178 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	7068 Points +35%
Average Allwinner A523 (5224 - 5749, n=2)	5487 Points +5%
Teclast P26T	5224 Points

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=58, last 2 years)	4238 Points +208%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	2551 Points +85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	2550 Points +85%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	2283 Points +66%
Teclast M50 HD	1923 Points +40%
Blackview Tab 80	1887 Points +37%
Teclast P26T	1378 Points
Average Allwinner A523 ()	1378 Points 0%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=58, last 2 years)	7305 Points +176%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	5580 Points +111%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	5507 Points +108%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	4777 Points +81%
Teclast M50 HD	4335 Points +64%
Blackview Tab 80	4335 Points +64%
Teclast P26T	2642 Points
Average Allwinner A523 ()	2642 Points 0%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=58, last 2 years)	4900 Points +257%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	3412 Points +149%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	3178 Points +131%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	3120 Points +127%
Teclast M50 HD	2805 Points +104%
Blackview Tab 80	2675 Points +95%
Teclast P26T	1373 Points
Average Allwinner A523 ()	1373 Points 0%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=58, last 2 years)	9295 Points +668%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	2179 Points +80%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	2124 Points +76%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1497 Points +24%
Teclast P26T	1210 Points
Average Allwinner A523 ()	1210 Points 0%
Blackview Tab 80	1076 Points -11%
Teclast M50 HD	1011 Points -16%
Web
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=58, last 2 years)	1272 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	1138 Points +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1116 Points +36%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1114 Points +36%
Teclast M50 HD	1112 Points +35%
Blackview Tab 80	1034 Points +26%
Teclast P26T	822 Points
Average Allwinner A523 ()	822 Points 0%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)	7290 Points +5183%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	348 Points +152%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	304 Points +120%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	302 Points +119%
Teclast M50 HD	279 Points +102%
Blackview Tab 80	256 Points +86%
Average Allwinner A523 (138 - 162, n=2)	150 Points +9%
Teclast P26T	138 Points

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=56, last 2 years)	11456 Points +316%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	4150 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	4094 Points +48%
Average Allwinner A523 (2757 - 2824, n=2)	2791 Points +1%
Teclast P26T	2757 Points
Teclast M50 HD	2690 Points -2%
Blackview Tab 80	2678 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	1662 Points -40%

Legend

Teclast P26T Allwinner A523, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Blackview Tab 80 Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Teclast M50 HD Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Average Allwinner A523

Average of class Tablet

ARM Mali-G57 MC1 ARM Mali-G57 MC1与竞争对手相比，Teclast P26T 在合成基准测试中的表现更胜一筹。正如 GFXBench 的 T-Rex 基准测试所显示的那样，每秒 30 帧左右的数值在游戏时非常真实。这款平板电脑的主要优势在于其 1280x800 像素的低显示分辨率，这意味着它需要计算的像素要比许多竞争对手少得多。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	185 Points +36%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	136 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	132 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	121 Points -11%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	104 Points -24%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	100 Points -26%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	189 Points +35%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	140 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	135 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	123 Points -12%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	101 Points -28%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	90 Points -36%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	722 Points +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	574 Points +15%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	522 Points +4%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	500 Points
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	424 Points -15%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	421 Points -16%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	721 Points +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	589 Points +16%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	524 Points +3%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	508 Points
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	432 Points -15%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	425 Points -16%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1527 Points +48%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1429 Points +39%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1146 Points +11%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1029 Points
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	989 Points -4%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	978 Points -5%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1332 Points +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1309 Points +39%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	979 Points +4%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	942 Points
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	829 Points -12%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	822 Points -13%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3124 Points +106%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2848 Points +88%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2650 Points +75%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2593 Points +71%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2105 Points +39%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1517 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	38 fps +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	37 fps +23%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	34 fps +13%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31 fps +3%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	30 fps
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps -27%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps +95%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps +95%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	32 fps +52%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps +5%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps 0%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	27 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24 fps +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps 0%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	19 fps -10%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps -33%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	26 fps +73%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps +47%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	20 fps +33%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps -7%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps -7%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	19 fps 0%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	19 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps -26%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps -42%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps -54%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +50%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps +20%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	10 fps
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps -13%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.7 fps -13%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps 0%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8.8 fps -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	7.5 fps -32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.4 fps -42%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps -53%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.7 fps +64%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.1 fps +37%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.6 fps +12%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.9 fps
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.7 fps -3%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.4 fps -8%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	7.9 fps
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	7 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5.9 fps -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.3 fps -33%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4.5 fps -43%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.4 fps -57%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3.7 fps +54%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.3 fps +38%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2.7 fps +13%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2.4 fps
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2.1 fps -12%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2 fps -17%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.4 fps -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9 fps -31%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.4 fps -43%
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.4 fps -58%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	10 fps +59%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9.8 fps +56%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7.8 fps +24%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	6.3 fps
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.5 fps -13%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.3 fps -16%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1.6 fps +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1.4 fps +40%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1.2 fps +20%
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1 fps
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	0.85 fps -15%
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash	0.8 fps -20%

使用 P26T 上网冲浪通常既快速又流畅。不过，浏览器测试并没有反映出这一点，因为 P26T 在测试中总是最后一名。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=68, last 2 years)	109.8 Points +392%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	52.9 Points +137%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)	50.247 Points +125%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	49.8 Points +123%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)	47.753 Points +114%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	46.85 Points +110%
Average Allwinner A523 (22.3 - 26.9, n=2)	24.6 Points +10%
Teclast P26T (Chrome 114.0.5735.60)	22.32 Points

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=67, last 2 years)	105.2 Points +305%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	58 Points +123%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	57 Points +119%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	53 Points +104%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)	52 Points +100%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)	51 Points +96%
Average Allwinner A523 (26 - 30, n=2)	28 Points +8%
Teclast P26T (Chrome 114.0.5735.60)	26 Points

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=44, last 2 years)	151.7 Points +270%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	93 Points +127%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	93 Points +127%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)	78 Points +90%
Teclast P26T (Chrome 114.0.5735.60)	41 Points
Average Allwinner A523 ()	41 Points 0%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=62, last 2 years)	116.9 runs/min +492%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	53.5 runs/min +171%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)	39.3 runs/min +99%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chome 112)	38.16 runs/min +93%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)	36.9 runs/min +87%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chome 111)	34.43 runs/min +74%
Average Allwinner A523 (19.8 - 21.8, n=2)	20.8 runs/min +5%
Teclast P26T (Chrome 114.0.5735.60)	19.75 runs/min

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=85, last 2 years)	28868 Points +388%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 120)	14279 Points +142%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	12681 Points +115%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)	12397 Points +110%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	11952 Points +102%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)	11786 Points +99%
Average Allwinner A523 (5911 - 6314, n=2)	6113 Points +3%
Teclast P26T (Chrome 114.0.5735.60)	5911 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Allwinner A523 (8641 - 8772, n=2)	8707 ms * -1%
Teclast P26T (Chrome 114.0.5735.60)	8641.2 ms *
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=73, last 2 years)	3794 ms * +56%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)	3176.1 ms * +63%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)	3075.1 ms * +64%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)	3053.2 ms * +65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)	2895.3 ms * +66%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	2650.1 ms * +69%

* ... smaller is better

Teclast P26T 的 eMMC 闪存在这个价位的产品中很常见。它的速度并不快，无法实现短加载时间或高数据吞吐量。

	Teclast P26T	Blackview Tab 80	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	Teclast M50 HD	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	Average 128 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		148%	177%	122%	94%	328%	116%	622%
Sequential Read 256KB	237.62	266.71 12%	277.2 17%	266.2 12%	249 5%	297.47 25%	283 ?(106.7 - 511, n=76) 19%	1055 ?(163 - 3912, n=73, last 2 years) 344%
Sequential Write 256KB	137.55	235.98 72%	210.4 53%	192.3 40%	83 -40%	228.97 66%	194.6 ?(72.3 - 314, n=76) 41%	692 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=73, last 2 years) 403%
Random Read 4KB	63.08	65.11 3%	105.1 67%	70.4 12%	67.3 7%	102.41 62%	82.7 ?(8.63 - 247, n=76) 31%	191 ?(18.4 - 451, n=73, last 2 years) 203%
Random Write 4KB	11.69	70.74 505%	78.5 572%	61 422%	58.8 403%	146.92 1157%	55.1 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=76) 371%	191.4 ?(8.23 - 555, n=73, last 2 years) 1537%

游戏 - 《PUBG Mobile》接近 30-FPS 大关

在玩游戏时，Teclast P26T 给人的印象并不差，尤其是通过触摸屏进行控制的效果很好。但只有图形简单的游戏（如《地铁冲浪》）才能真正流畅地显示。从下面的 FPS 图表中可以看到的短暂下降是由于打开菜单造成的，因此可以忽略不计。

在要求更高的游戏中，如《Asphalt 9》（高图形质量）或《PUBG Mobile》（高清/高设置），P26T 的帧数接近每秒 30 帧。不过，这两款游戏的帧数也会反复出现明显下降。我们对《Asphalt 9》和《PUBG Mobile》两款游戏的整体印象介于 "卡顿 "和 "可接受 "之间。

我们使用Gamebench测试工具来确定游戏帧率。

Teclast P26T; Asphalt 9: Legends; 4.4.0k: Ø25.8 (11-37)

Teclast P26T; PUBG Mobile; 3.0.0: Ø28.4 (17-31)

Teclast P26T; Subway Surfers; 3.23.1: Ø60.9 (29-62)

排放 - 来自 Teclast P26T 的平面立体声音效

温度

Teclast P26T 在运行过程中几乎不会升温。在表面上，我们测得摄像头区域的最高温度为 47.8 °C（118 °F）。但这一数值是在平板电脑承受了一小时的高负荷 "Burnout "基准测试后才达到的。在正常使用情况下，表面温度要比这一数值低得多。

平板电脑能够有效地去除全志A523正如3DMark的Wild Life压力测试所显示的那样。即使在两个测试场景中运行了20次之后，帧率仍然与开始测试时一样高。

Max. Load

Idle


43.5 °C	28.5 °C	28.2 °C
46.2 °C	29.5 °C	28.6 °C
37.2 °C	29.8 °C	27.4 °C

Maximum: 46.2 °C
Average: 33.2 °C


28 °C	30.6 °C	43.3 °C
28 °C	30.6 °C	47.8 °C
27.8 °C	29.4 °C	36 °C

Maximum: 47.8 °C
Average: 33.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43.1 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.04 (3.03-3.05)

Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.52-2.56)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.14 (3.13-3.16)

Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.53-2.55)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.35 (4.34-4.36)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.5 (3.49-3.5)

Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.825 (0.817-0.835)

Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.619 (0.55-0.676)

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.799 (0.789-0.809)

Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.633 (0.547-0.721)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.117 (1.11-1.127)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.726 (0.72-0.741)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.52 (3.52-3.53)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	98.5 (1.11^min - 1.127^max) % +1%
Teclast P26T	97.8 (0.817^min - 0.835^max) %
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	97.5 (0.789^min - 0.809^max) % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	97.3 (0.72^min - 0.741^max) % -1%
Blackview Tab 80	81.3 (0.55^min - 0.676^max) % -17%
Teclast M50 HD	75.9 (0.547^min - 0.721^max) % -22%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	99.6 (3.49^min - 3.5^max) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022	99.4 (4.34^min - 4.36^max) % 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3	99.3 (3.13^min - 3.16^max) % 0%
Teclast M50 HD	99.3 (2.53^min - 2.55^max) % 0%
Teclast P26T	99.3 (3.03^min - 3.05^max) %
Blackview Tab 80	98.2 (2.52^min - 2.56^max) % -1%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	99.9 (3.52^min - 3.53^max) %

Legend

Teclast P26T Allwinner A523, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Blackview Tab 80 Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Teclast M50 HD Unisoc T7200, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

发言人

P26T 的两个扬声器都位于右侧短边，因此只有在纵向握持平板电脑时才能获得立体声效果。总的来说，没有低音的混音效果不是很平衡，使任何音乐听起来都很平淡。另一方面，声音听起来非常清晰。

您可以使用 3.5 毫米音频接口或蓝牙 5.2 连接外部音频设备。P26T 支持 AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC 和 SBC 蓝牙音频编解码器。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Teclast P26T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 电池寿命短，充电时间长

耗电量

Teclast 平板电脑配有 6000 毫安时电池，可使用随附的 10 瓦充电器充电。在我们的测试中，平板电脑完全充满电需要 4:12 小时。

P26T 的功耗并不明显，闲置时为 1.3 瓦，负载时为 4.6 瓦。但与之相比，诸如 Blackview Tab 80和 Teclast M50 HD的运行效率更高。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1 / 1.3 / 1.7 Watt
Load	4.6 / 8.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Teclast P26T 6000 mAh	Blackview Tab 80 7680 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh	Teclast M50 HD 6000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 7040 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh
Power Consumption		26%	-53%	10%	-14%	-98%
Idle Minimum *	1	0.8 20%	1.9 -90%	1.2 -20%	1.4 -40%	0.63 37%
Idle Average *	1.3	1 23%	2.1 -62%	1.3 -0%	1.6 -23%	4.25 -227%
Idle Maximum *	1.7	1.5 12%	2.5 -47%	1.5 12%	2 -18%	4.34 -155%
Load Average *	4.6	3.2 30%	7.6 -65%	3.6 22%	4.2 9%	10.24 -123%
Load Maximum *	8.7	4.9 44%	9 -3%	5.5 37%	8.7 -0%	10.47 -20%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast P26T Allwinner A523: Ø5.83 (4.15-8.74)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618: Ø6.22 (3.31-8.74)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast P26T Allwinner A523; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.79 (4.15-6.74)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.58 (5.39-6.32)

Teclast P26T Allwinner A523; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.165 (1.073-1.509)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.735 (1.657-2.28)

电池寿命

电池寿命是 Teclast P26T 最大的弱点之一。在调整亮度为 150 cd/m²（相当于显示设置中的 55%）的情况下进行模拟网上冲浪时，平板电脑的续航时间不到 7 小时。在持续循环播放视频时，它的续航时间要长约一小时。在负载情况下，不到 3 小时电池就会耗尽。

在这一点上，Teclast P26T 甚至比不上它的竞争对手。即使是两款 "最弱 "的对比设备，其续航时间也要长得多。尽管电池容量较小，但联想 Tab M10 Gen 3在网上冲浪时的续航时间是它的两倍多，而 Teclast M50 HD在播放视频时可达到 7 小时。Teclast P26T 与小米红米 Pad SE相差甚远，后者在网上冲浪和播放视频时的续航时间都大大超过了 16 小时。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		12h 26min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 43min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 59min

	Teclast P26T 6000 mAh	Blackview Tab 80 7680 mAh	Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh	Teclast M50 HD 6000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 7040 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh
Battery Runtime		168%	103%	79%	137%	192%
Reader / Idle	746	2591 247%	1952 162%	1774 138%	2869 285%	4236 468%
H.264	463	871 88%	1002 116%	785 70%	942 103%	997 115%
WiFi v1.3	400	1012 153%	861 115%	667 67%	874 119%	1017 154%
Load	179	508 184%	213 19%	249 39%	250 40%	231 29%

Pros

+ 相对较大的存储容量

+ microSD 插槽

+ DRM Widevine L1

+ 无 PWM

+ 纯Android 13

+ 附带对开盖

Cons

- 无线局域网速度慢且不稳定

- 保修期短，更新时间不明确

- 摄像头质量差

- 显示屏分辨率低，有色差

- 显示屏亮度低

- 几乎没有性能储备

- 扬声器效果一般

- 电池寿命短

- 充电速度慢

对 Teclast P26T 的评价

Teclast P26T 是一款可靠的入门级平板电脑，其外观并没有显示出 100 欧元（约合 108 美元）的价格。它的塑料外壳做工精良，背面的波浪形纹理带来了良好的握持感。蓝色的外壳看起来很优雅。平板电脑的重量为 511 克（约 18 盎司），略高于许多同类产品，但长时间握在手中仍不会感觉太重。

不过，为了换取低廉的购买价格，你也不得不接受一些妥协。不出所料，IPS 显示屏并不是最亮的，P26T 主要变成了室内使用的平板电脑。同样不足为奇的是，P26T 的摄像头并不出色，SoC 也几乎没有带来任何性能储备。但更重要的是，Teclast 没有说明其平板电脑的更新政策。

Teclast P26T 是一款非常实惠的入门级平板电脑，配备Android 13，通过许多妥协实现了其经济实惠的价格。

P26T 最大的两个缺点是其不稳定和蹩脚的 Wi-Fi 5，在测试过程中多次出现连接问题，以及电池续航时间非常短。不过，无线局域网的问题有可能在未来的更新中得到解决。

Teclast P26T 的替代产品有 Blackview Tab 80和联想 Tab M10 Gen 3为例。这两款产品价格相近，但无线局域网速度更快、更稳定，电池续航时间也明显更长。此外，Blackview 的 IPS 面板相当明亮，而联想 Tab 则采用金属外壳。联想 Tab M10 Gen 3 和 Blackview Tab 80 都支持 LTE。

价格和供应情况

制造商将Teclast P26T 的售价定为 99 美元。在亚马逊和阿里巴巴网站上都有销售。但是，美国亚马逊和英国亚马逊都显示目前无货。

Teclast P26T - 01/29/2024 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

77 / 98 → 79%

Keyboard

71 / 80 → 89%

Pointing Device

88%

Connectivity

32 / 70 → 46%

Weight

83 / 40-88 → 89%

Battery

73%

Display

71%

Games Performance

11 / 78 → 14%

Application Performance

45 / 92 → 49%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

68 / 91 → 75%

Camera

45 / 85 → 53%

Average

66%

75%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.