Teclast P50 评测--适合沙发冲浪者的经济型 11 英寸平板电脑

Name: Teclast P50
Brand: Teclast

高清艺人。

200 美元以下的平板电脑在性能和连接性方面往往有很多不足之处。如果你选择 Teclast P50，你也必须做出一些妥协，但作为回报，你将得到一款冲浪和多媒体平板电脑，它拥有不错的存储空间、良好的运行时间和 4G 功能。由于支持 Widevine L1，您还可以获得高清流媒体网络内容。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/19/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Tablet Touchscreen

由中国制造商 Teclast 生产的 P50 是一款经济实惠的平板电脑，主要用于多媒体用途。虽然 Teclast 平板电脑的 10.95 英寸 IPS 显示屏只能显示 1280 x 800 像素，但它的亮度很高。此外，它还支持 DRM Widevine L1，可以高清播放 Netflix 等流媒体。

尽管 Teclast P50 的官方售价超过 300 美元，但你只需 100 多美元就能买到它，而且它还能提供相对丰富的功能。它使用Android 14 运行，拥有 128 GB 存储空间和 4G 手机调制解调器，支持双卡双待。

Test device courtesy of Teclast Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Teclast P50

Processor

Unisoc T7200 (T606) 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP1

Memory

6 GB

, LPDDR4

Display

10.95 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 138 PPI, capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB

, 115 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Sensors: gravity sensor, hall sensor, Camera2 API Limited

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (Band 2, 3, 5, 8), 3G (Band 1, 2, 5, 8), 4G (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 258 x 170

Battery

8000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 10 watt charging

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED flash, 1080p@30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix videos up to 720p@30fps

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 10W charger (5V/2A), USB-C cable, SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty card, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

545 g, Power Supply: 41 g

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
73.8 %	06 / 2024	Teclast P50 T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1	545 g	8.6 mm	10.95"	1280x800
83.4 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2024	Lenovo Tab M11 Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2	465 g	7.2 mm	11.00"	1920x1200
84.2 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2024	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	480 g	6.9 mm	11.00"	1920x1200
81.7 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2024	Teclast T50 HD T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1	500 g	7.9 mm	10.95"	1920x1200
81.5 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2023	Telekom T Tablet Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2	490 g	7.8 mm	10.40"	2000x1200
83.5 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE SD 680, Adreno 610	481 g	7.36 mm	11.00"	1920x1200

外壳 - 坚固耐用的铝制外壳

Teclast P50 采用铝制外壳，圆润的边缘和浅蓝色的磨砂后盖使其外观极具质感。单从外观上看，你根本看不出这只是一款入门级平板电脑。背面有一个塑料条，可以改善蜂窝模块的连接。摄像头模块上方的 AI 摄像头标签表明它采用了先进的技术，但遗憾的是，除了快照质量外，该设备并不能提供更多的功能。

约 1 厘米宽的边框赋予了 Teclast 平板电脑相当现代的外观。P50 重 545 克，拿在手上非常舒适，但比同类产品要重一些。您无需使用很大的力气就可以凹陷和扭转 P50，但在这样做的时候，您不会从它身上感受到任何图像伪影或吱吱嘎嘎的声音。P50 没有 IP 认证。

尺寸比较

连接性 - P50 内置 6GB RAM 和 128GB 存储空间

Teclast P50 提供 6GB LPDDR4 内存和 128GB UFS 2.2 存储空间。其内部存储空间可通过 microSD 卡进行扩展，最大容量可达 1 TB。如果不扩展存储空间，也可以在混合插槽中插入两张 nano SIM 卡。

Teclast P50 的 USB-C 端口支持 USB OTG，因此可以用来连接键盘、鼠标或 U 盘等 USB 外围设备。外部音频设备可通过 3.5 毫米插孔连接到平板电脑。此外，还配备了立体声扬声器。

右：3.5 毫米耳机插孔、扬声器、USB-C 2.0、混合 SIM 卡/microSD 卡插槽

microSD 读卡器

使用我们的 microSD 参考卡 Angelbird AV Pro V60，测试设备内的 microSD 读卡器在复制测试中实现了良好的传输速率，平均为 39.8 MByte/s。在对比设备中，三星三星Galaxy Tab A9+做得最好，数值约为 47 MByte/s。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	47.18 MB/s +19%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	41.2 MB/s +4%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	39.8 MB/s
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	34.4 MB/s -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	28.92 MB/s -27%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	17.02 MB/s -57%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø40.2 (31.3-47.2)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.8 (29.7-46.3)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.7 (21.9-44.3)

Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.5 (39.3-80.5)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78 (60.4-86.2)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø64.6 (36.3-77.6)

软件 -Android 14 无臃肿软件

Teclast P50 可运行Android 14 原版系统，因为平板电脑上没有预装第三方应用程序。这也意味着预装系统不会占用设备太多空间。首次开机后，用户可从初始的 128 GB 存储空间中获得 115 GB 的可用空间。

在测试时（2024 年 6 月中旬），Teclast P50 收到了1.05_20240525 版本的操作系统更新，其最新的Android 安全补丁是从 4 月 5 日开始的。Teclast 还没有说明 P50 将在多长时间内接受更新以及更新的频率。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 5 和带 4G 功能的双 SIM 卡

WiFi 5、蓝牙 5.0 和 4G 蜂窝数据是 Teclast P50 与外界连接的三种方式。它支持的 4G 频段有 1、3、5、7、8、20、34、38、39、40 和 41，频率覆盖范围很广，因此至少在欧盟范围内的信号质量不会有问题，这也是本次测试的目的所在。

在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 作为参考路由器进行的 WLAN 测试中，P50 实现了良好而稳定的 WiFi 5 数据吞吐量，峰值达到 357 MBit/s。价格相近的对比设备的传输速率都不相上下。

Networking
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	318 (min: 280) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	357 (min: 337) MBit/s ∼96%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	304 (min: 283) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	360 (min: 353) MBit/s ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	340 (min: 172) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	369 (min: 356) MBit/s ∼99%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	320 (min: 196) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	358 (min: 340) MBit/s ∼96%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	371 (min: 365) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	372 (min: 358) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	307 (min: 284) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	369 (min: 179) MBit/s ∼99%

Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606), ARM Mali-G57 MP1; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø317 (280-333)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø333 (172-350)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø307 (284-322)

Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606), ARM Mali-G57 MP1; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø357 (337-370)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (356-387)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (179-379)

P50 可以使用卫星导航服务 GPS、Glonass 和北斗（均为单波段模式）来确定用户的位置。

在建筑物内，平板电脑需要相当长的时间才能确定自己的位置，而且即使确定了，定位也不是很准确。在室外，其精确度从 13 米提高到 5 米，但在这种情况下，你也需要等待很长时间才能显示出半精确的位置。

在我们的导航测试中，P50 给人的印象好坏参半。它只能非常不准确地记录我们 5 公里的城市旅行。相反，平板电脑在乡村路线上的表现要好得多。其精确度几乎不亚于我们的导航参考设备--Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表。

照相机 - 可拍摄快照

在大多数廉价平板电脑上，摄像头通常是应急解决方案，Teclast P50 也不例外。它的 500 万像素自拍摄像头只能拍摄出模糊和噪点较多的图像。录制视频时的画质也差不多，最高只能达到 720p。这对于视频通话来说已经足够了。

主摄像头分辨率为 1300 万像素，与自拍摄像头不同的是，它配有 LED 闪光灯和自动对焦功能。乍一看，它甚至还能拍出相当不错的照片，但照片的颜色很淡，细节也不多。放大后的照片噪点较多，在弱光环境下，主体会被黑暗遮挡。主摄像头最高可录制 1080p 30fps 的视频。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1 Daylight photo 2 Low-light photo

click to load images

Teclast P50

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 15

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

click to load images

Teclast P50

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 15

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

click to load images

Teclast P50

Canon EOS 600D

Apple iPhone 15

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

在受控照明条件下，主相机显示，即使在最佳照明条件下，其色彩描绘和图像清晰度也会受到影响。1 勒克斯的残余光线太少，不足以让测试图和 ColorChecker 卡曝光到足以辨认。

配件和保修 - Teclast P50 配有 10 瓦电源

Teclast P50 的供货范围包括一个 10 瓦电源（5V/2A）、一条 USB 线缆（A 型至 C 型）、一个 SIM 卡工具、一本简短的使用手册以及一张保修卡。您还可以通过 Teclast 网站购买该设备的对开保护套。

制造商为平板电脑提供 12 个月的标准保修。

输入设备和操作 - 不带指纹传感器的 Teclast P50

Teclast P50 的触摸屏对边缘输入反应迅速。不过，由于面板刷新率较低，仅为 60 Hz，因此显示效果并不流畅。

Teclast 平板电脑没有指纹传感器。你只能通过 2D 面部识别技术进行生物解锁，只要有足够的环境光线，这种技术就能可靠地工作。此外，您还可以使用图案、PIN 码和密码来解锁设备。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 无 PWM 的 IPS 面板

Teclast P50 的 10.95 英寸 IPS 面板分辨率为 1280 x 800 像素，像素密度仅为 138 PPI。

在播放视频时，你可能不会注意到这一点，但在显示静态内容（如菜单或网站）时，16:10 的画面看起来并不太清晰，仔细观察倾斜的边缘，你可以看到像素。同价位的对比设备显示的画面更清晰，因为它们的分辨率至少达到了 1920 x 1200 像素。

在亮度方面，IPS 屏幕表现出色。在显示白色背景时，其平均亮度为 415.8 cd/m²，而在显示均匀分布的明暗图像摘录时（APL18 测量值），其亮度水平上升到 466 cd/m²。测试设备在这些结果上表现出色，因为对比设备的亮度水平都差不多。P50 没有配备亮度传感器。

IPS 面板无需使用脉宽调制即可调节亮度。这意味着它非常适合对 PWM 闪烁敏感的用户。


409 cd/m²	420 cd/m²	417 cd/m²
407 cd/m²	441 cd/m²	421 cd/m²
396 cd/m²	422 cd/m²	409 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 441 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 415.8 cd/m² Minimum: 16.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 441 cd/m²
Contrast: 1103:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
78.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3

	Teclast P50 IPS, 1280x800, 11"	Lenovo Tab M11 IPS, 1920x1200, 11"	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"	Teclast T50 HD IPS, 1920x1200, 11"	Telekom T Tablet TFT-LCD, 2000x1200, 10.4"	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"
Screen		-13%	-4%	13%	-33%	27%
Brightness middle	441	431 -2%	493 12%	500 13%	529 20%	473 7%
Brightness	416	405 -3%	460 11%	457 10%	486 17%	449 8%
Brightness Distribution	90	88 -2%	90 0%	86 -4%	87 -3%	85 -6%
Black Level *	0.4	0.4 -0%	0.35 12%	0.33 17%	0.56 -40%	0.28 30%
Contrast	1103	1078 -2%	1409 28%	1515 37%	945 -14%	1689 53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.01	9.72 -94%	6 -20%	4.64 7%	9.6 -92%	3 40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.57	11.59 -35%	11.7 -37%	9.02 -5%	14.4 -68%	6 30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.8	3.6 38%	8.2 -41%	4.1 29%	10.5 -81%	2.7 53%
Gamma	2.3 ^96%	2.194 ^100%	2.21 ^100%	2.016 ^109%	2.17 ^101%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	8477 ^77%	7348 ^88%	9131 ^71%	7316 ^89%	10482 ^62%	6589 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

IPS 面板的色彩校准不是最好的。它显示出明显的偏蓝，而且只覆盖了约 79% 的小 sRGB 色彩空间。在色彩和灰度描绘方面，它与理想值的偏差控制在一定范围内，IPS 面板的对比度为 1103:1，因此也能以相当生动的方式显示内容。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.8 ms rise
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.9 ms rise
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Teclast P50 的视角稳定 IPS 面板亮度足以满足户外使用的要求。不过，其有限的亮度储备很快就用完了，如果阳光直接照射到显示屏上，那么它们很快就很难与由此产生的反光相抗衡。

性能 - 配备 Unisoc T606 的 Teclast P50

Teclast P50 Unisoc T606主要用于价格较低的平板电脑和智能手机。该 SoC 的性能与联发科 Helio G99的性能相当。联想 Tab M11和高通骁龙 680 4G内的小米红米 Pad SE.它足以满足视频、网上冲浪和玩简单游戏的需求。不过，在日常使用中可能会经常出现小的卡顿或延迟。

Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=70, last 2 years)	3544 Points +160%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	1993 Points +46%
Telekom T Tablet	1919 Points +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1439 Points +5%
Lenovo Tab M11	1379 Points +1%
Teclast P50	1364 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (1285 - 1482, n=11)	1364 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD	1319 Points -3%
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=70, last 2 years)	1111 Points +195%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	919 Points +144%
Telekom T Tablet	711 Points +89%
Lenovo Tab M11	436 Points +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	413 Points +10%
Teclast P50	377 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (368 - 380, n=11)	375 Points -1%
Teclast T50 HD	368 Points -2%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points +135%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	693 Points +130%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	384 Points +28%
Lenovo Tab M11	364 Points +21%
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (273 - 313, n=19)	306 Points +2%
Teclast P50	301 Points
Teclast T50 HD	300 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2494 Points +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	1768 Points +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1684 Points +35%
Lenovo Tab M11	1475 Points +18%
Teclast P50	1247 Points
Teclast T50 HD	1217 Points -2%
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (708 - 1324, n=19)	1206 Points -3%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=37, last 2 years)	781418 Points +218%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	422144 Points +72%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	287727 Points +17%
Teclast P50	245797 Points
Teclast T50 HD	245367 Points 0%
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (221540 - 245797, n=6)	237693 Points -3%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=48, last 2 years)	469872 Points +117%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	354299 Points +64%
Teclast T50 HD	236491 Points +9%
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (202973 - 238808, n=6)	221439 Points +2%
Teclast P50	216040 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	201810 Points -7%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	10550 Points +44%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9847 Points +34%
Lenovo Tab M11	9802 Points +34%
Telekom T Tablet	8329 Points +14%
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (6637 - 8303, n=19)	7338 Points 0%
Teclast P50	7327 Points
Teclast T50 HD	7321 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	7068 Points -4%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	773 Points +122%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	578 Points +66%
Telekom T Tablet	534 Points +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	402 Points +16%
Teclast T50 HD	362 Points +4%
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (339 - 362, n=5)	349 Points 0%
Teclast P50	348 Points

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4205 Points +118%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	3596 Points +87%
Telekom T Tablet	2839 Points +47%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	2551 Points +33%
Teclast P50	1925 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (1879 - 1954, n=7)	1913 Points -1%
Teclast T50 HD	1879 Points -2%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	7626 Points +82%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7265 Points +74%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	5580 Points +33%
Telekom T Tablet	4934 Points +18%
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (4009 - 4362, n=7)	4273 Points +2%
Teclast P50	4181 Points
Teclast T50 HD	4009 Points -4%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4862 Points +65%
Telekom T Tablet	3923 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	3872 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	3120 Points +6%
Teclast P50	2954 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (2675 - 3095, n=7)	2808 Points -5%
Teclast T50 HD	2679 Points -9%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9168 Points +798%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	4337 Points +325%
Telekom T Tablet	2667 Points +161%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	2179 Points +113%
Teclast T50 HD	1027 Points +1%
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (989 - 1076, n=7)	1023 Points 0%
Teclast P50	1021 Points
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	1307 Points +20%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points +16%
Telekom T Tablet	1258 Points +15%
Teclast T50 HD	1129 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	1116 Points +2%
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (1034 - 1129, n=7)	1098 Points +1%
Teclast P50	1090 Points

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)	7290 Points +2513%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	429 Points +54%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	348 Points +25%
Teclast P50	279 Points
Teclast T50 HD	275 Points -1%
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (256 - 280, n=6)	275 Points -1%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11323 Points +258%
Telekom T Tablet	9056 Points +186%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	5687 Points +80%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	4150 Points +31%
Teclast T50 HD	3441 Points +9%
Teclast P50	3164 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (2678 - 3748, n=7)	3026 Points -4%

Legend

Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Lenovo Tab M11 Mediatek Helio G88, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Teclast T50 HD Unisoc T7200 (T606), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Average Unisoc T7200 (T606)

Average of class Tablet

产品 Unisoc T606's ARM Mali-G57 MP1提供入门级 GPU 性能。只有图形要求不高的游戏，或图形设置降至最低的游戏才能在平板电脑上流畅运行。另一方面，正如 GFXBench 的 T-Rex 基准测试所显示的那样，它也能达到 30fps 以上的帧速率。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	361 Points +209%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	326 Points +179%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	179 Points +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	123 Points +5%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	117 Points 0%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	117 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1206 Points +185%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1171 Points +177%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	700 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	574 Points +36%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	423 Points
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	422 Points 0%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1216 Points +183%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1173 Points +173%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	702 Points +64%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	589 Points +37%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	429 Points
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	422 Points -2%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3075 Points +214%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2511 Points +156%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1429 Points +46%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1385 Points +41%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	980 Points
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	979 Points 0%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2991 Points +260%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2321 Points +180%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1309 Points +58%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1203 Points +45%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	830 Points 0%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	830 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3516 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3409 Points +29%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2935 Points +11%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2652 Points
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2647 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2105 Points -21%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	82 fps +134%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	51 fps +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	37 fps +6%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps -37%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	93 fps +323%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	61 fps +177%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	41 fps +86%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps 0%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	45 fps +67%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	34 fps +26%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	27 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps -22%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps -48%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps +236%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	38 fps +171%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	22 fps +57%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps +7%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	33 fps +74%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	23 fps +21%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps -26%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.8 fps -54%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps +295%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	24 fps +179%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +74%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.9 fps +3%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.6 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +73%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps +9%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	7.5 fps -32%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.3 fps -52%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +258%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +183%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.1 fps +53%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.4 fps +2%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.3 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps +78%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.3 fps +14%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.3 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.3 fps -27%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5 fps -32%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.4 fps -53%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.2 fps +310%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	5.2 fps +160%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.3 fps +65%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.3 fps +65%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2 fps 0%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps +91%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps +9%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9 fps -18%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.3 fps -25%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.4 fps -51%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps +307%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps +141%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9.8 fps +81%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.9 fps +65%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.5 fps +2%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.4 fps

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.6 fps +309%
Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2.2 fps +150%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1.4 fps +59%
Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1.4 fps +59%
Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	0.88 fps 0%
Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	0.88 fps

Teclast P50 一般可以流畅地浏览互联网。浏览器基准测试证实了这一点，该平板电脑的性能值与大多数对比设备相当。即便如此，三星三星Galaxy Tab A9+要快得多。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)	111.2 Points +113%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	96.598 Points +85%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	58.17 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	52.9 Points +1%
Teclast T50 HD	52.862 Points +1%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)	52.153 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (38.1 - 52.9, n=8)	48.6 Points -7%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	107 Points +98%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)	106.9 Points +98%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	57 Points +6%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	56 Points +4%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)	56 Points +4%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)	54 Points
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (51 - 56, n=7)	52.6 Points -3%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)	155.2 Points +122%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	144 Points +106%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	93 Points +33%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)	86 Points +23%
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (70 - 86, n=4)	77.8 Points +11%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)	70 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)	121.9 runs/min +154%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	71.6 runs/min +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	53.5 runs/min +11%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)	52.1 runs/min +9%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)	48 runs/min
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (31.2 - 52.1, n=7)	40.8 runs/min -15%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)	29371 Points +118%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	29301 Points +118%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	21843 Points +62%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 120)	14279 Points +6%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)	13455 Points
Lenovo Tab M11 (Chrome 124)	13413 Points 0%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)	13211 Points -2%
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (2228 - 13455, n=14)	11332 Points -16%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)	3734 ms * -29%
Average Unisoc T7200 (T606) (2904 - 3187, n=7)	3045 ms * -5%
Teclast T50 HD (Chrome 124.0.6367.83)	2965.7 ms * -2%
Teclast P50 (Chrome 125.0.6422.113)	2903.5 ms *
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)	2650.1 ms * +9%
Telekom T Tablet (chrome 116)	2194.9 ms * +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)	1352.9 ms * +53%

* ... smaller is better

Teclast 为其平板电脑提供了 UFS 2.2 存储空间，这在这个价位的平板电脑中并不常见。在每次使用过程中，你都会发现该设备提供了比标准更多的存储空间，因为应用程序的加载速度相对较快。

	Teclast P50	Lenovo Tab M11	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	Teclast T50 HD	Telekom T Tablet	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-22%	29%	122%	-46%	-17%	59%	89%
Sequential Read 256KB	879.52	294.5 -67%	485.96 -45%	970.01 10%	287.1 -67%	297.47 -66%	728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71) -17%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 19%
Sequential Write 256KB	191.5	256.9 34%	476.37 149%	831.36 334%	188.3 -2%	228.97 20%	527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71) 175%	686 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) 258%
Random Read 4KB	122.95	95.6 -22%	130.67 6%	218.22 77%	52.8 -57%	102.41 -17%	191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71) 56%	189.4 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) 54%
Random Write 4KB	153.65	101.2 -34%	162.9 6%	257.68 68%	66.55 -57%	146.92 -4%	185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71) 21%	189.9 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) 24%

游戏 - 只有简单的游戏能流畅运行

我们使用Genshin Impact和PUBG Mobile测试了当前游戏在 Teclast P50 上的运行情况。遗憾的是，我们无法提供任何帧率，因为 Teclast 平板电脑不愿向我们的测试工具Gamebench提供相应的数值。在没有准确数据的情况下，我们仍然可以评估 P50 的游戏品质。

只有在运行图形简单的游戏时，P50 才能给人带来乐趣。玄心冲击》和《PUBG Mobile》不在其中，因为这两款游戏的系统要求都相当高。即使在最低图形设置下，Teclast P50 也无法流畅运行这两款游戏。

No graph data

排放 - Teclast 平板电脑上的立体声扬声器

温度

Teclast P50 在负载情况下非常稳定。3DMark 的 Wild Life 压力测试显示，它几乎可以在任何时候调用全部性能。在连续一小时的 "燃烧 "基准测试中，我们仅在平板电脑表面测得最高温度为 36.6 °C。

Max. Load

Idle


31.6 °C	36.6 °C	29.9 °C
32.3 °C	31.3 °C	29.6 °C
31 °C	29.9 °C	29.9 °C

Maximum: 36.6 °C
Average: 31.3 °C


31.5 °C	36 °C	32.2 °C
30.4 °C	32 °C	32.3 °C
30.1 °C	30.7 °C	31.1 °C

Maximum: 36 °C
Average: 31.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.5 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.1 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.57 (2.55-2.58)

Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.22 (4.19-4.23)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.23-7.27)

Teclast T50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.53-2.55)

Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.09 (7.07-7.1)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.5 (3.49-3.5)

Teclast P50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.699 (0.686-0.71)

Lenovo Tab M11 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.088 (1.072-1.097)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.14-2.16)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.726 (0.72-0.741)

Telekom T Tablet Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.02 (6.99-7.03)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.52 (3.52-3.53)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	99 (2.14^min - 2.16^max) % +3%
Lenovo Tab M11	97.8 (1.072^min - 1.097^max) % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	97.3 (0.72^min - 0.741^max) % +1%
Teclast P50	96.5 (0.686^min - 0.71^max) %
Teclast T50 HD	% -100%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	99.6 (3.49^min - 3.5^max) % +1%
Telekom T Tablet	99.6 (7.07^min - 7.1^max) % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+	99.5 (7.23^min - 7.27^max) % +1%
Teclast T50 HD	99.1 (2.53^min - 2.55^max) % 0%
Lenovo Tab M11	98.9 (4.19^min - 4.23^max) % 0%
Teclast P50	98.7 (2.55^min - 2.58^max) %
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE	99.9 (3.52^min - 3.53^max) %
Telekom T Tablet	99.5 (6.99^min - 7.03^max) %

Legend

Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Lenovo Tab M11 Mediatek Helio G88, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Teclast T50 HD Unisoc T7200 (T606), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Telekom T Tablet MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

发言人

Teclast 平板电脑的立体声扬声器在最大音量时声音高音很重。如果调低音量，声音会更加均衡，但由于缺乏低音，声音仍然比较平淡。不过，对于这个价位的产品来说，这样的效果还算不错。

外接音频设备可通过 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙 5.0 连接到平板电脑。Teclast P50 支持蓝牙编解码器 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、LC3 和 Opus。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Teclast P50 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 电池续航时间长，但充电速度慢

耗电量

Teclast P50 的最大充电功率为 10 瓦。平板电脑随附一个合适的电源。充电时，您只需稍有耐心。在我们的测试中，空电池需要 4:29 小时才能充满 100%的电量。如果达到 90%，那么充电时间将缩短至 3:48 小时。

在功耗方面，Teclast 平板电脑的表现堪称典范，因为它在负载和闲置模式下的功耗明显低于对比设备。P50 只面临内部竞争，因为 Teclast T50 HD更加节能。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.5 / 1.8 / 2.8 Watt
Load	4.3 / 9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Teclast P50 8000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 7040 mAh	Teclast T50 HD 8000 mAh	Telekom T Tablet 7000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh
Power Consumption		-67%	17%	-74%	-57%
Idle Minimum *	1.5	1 33%	1.6 -7%	1.28 15%	0.63 58%
Idle Average *	1.8	4.76 -164%	1.8 -0%	4.52 -151%	4.25 -136%
Idle Maximum *	2.8	4.79 -71%	2 29%	4.58 -64%	4.34 -55%
Load Average *	4.3	9.52 -121%	2.8 35%	10.5 -144%	10.24 -138%
Load Maximum *	9	9.92 -10%	6.4 29%	11.2 -24%	10.47 -16%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606): Ø6.55 (4.28-9.02)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø4.05 (1.974-6.6)

Teclast T50 HD Unisoc T7200 (T606): Ø3.86 (1.833-6.32)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606); 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.21 (4.15-5.71)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.41 (4.18-4.71)

Teclast T50 HD Unisoc T7200 (T606); 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.85 (2.59-3.31)

Teclast P50 Unisoc T7200 (T606); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.12 (3.05-3.5)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.02 (1.986-2.31)

Teclast T50 HD Unisoc T7200 (T606); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.701 (1.618-1.94)

运行时间

8000 毫安时电池为 Teclast P50 提供了良好的运行时间。在模拟网上冲浪测试中，我们将显示屏亮度设置为 150 cd/m²，平板电脑的运行时间略低于 12 小时。在相同的测试条件下连续循环播放高清视频时，P50 仅在 13:30 小时后才需要供电。

Teclast 平板电脑的电池续航时间与竞争对手相比还有差距。对比设备的电池几乎都能获得稍好的续航时间，其电池容量也高达 8000 毫安时。这一点尤其适用于小米红米 Pad SE在上网和播放视频时的续航时间远远超过 16 小时。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		45h 45min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 30min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 10min

	Teclast P50 8000 mAh	Lenovo Tab M11 7040 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 7040 mAh	Teclast T50 HD 8000 mAh	Telekom T Tablet 7000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8000 mAh
Battery Runtime		23%	-4%	-2%	6%	23%
Reader / Idle	2745		2275 -17%	1752 -36%		4236 54%
H.264	810		800 -1%	974 20%		997 23%
WiFi v1.3	728	896 23%	920 26%	895 23%	775 6%	1017 40%
Load	310		243 -22%	261 -16%		231 -25%

Pros

+ DRM Widevine L1

+ 16:10 IPS 显示屏

+ 无 PWM

+ 金属外壳

+ Android 14

+ 长续航

+ 4G 调制解调器和双卡双待

Cons

- 显示屏分辨率低

- 显示屏偏蓝

- 令人失望的摄像头

- 无指纹传感器

- 更新交付不明确

- 定位服务有时不准确

- 性能不佳

- 充电缓慢

对 Teclast P50 的评价

Teclast P50 是一款经济实惠的流媒体平板电脑，具有很多优点。除了光滑的铝制外壳外，它还支持 DRM Widevine L1、良好的存储配置、立体声扬声器和无任何臃肿软件的Android 14 系统。

由于配备了 4G 调制解调器，Teclast P50 还具有良好的电池续航能力和稳定的显示屏亮度，因此您还可以在旅途中使用它。由于 GPS 存在部分误差，这款平板电脑不太适合用作导航设备。

Teclast P50 是一款物美价廉的多媒体平板电脑，支持 DRM Widevine L1 并具有良好的运行时间，由于配备了 4G 调制解调器，它还可以在移动中使用。它的主要缺点是显示屏分辨率较低和 SoC 功能较弱。

这款 10.95 英寸设备的显示屏分辨率为 1280 x 800 像素，并不算高，幸好在其核心功能--播放视频时并不明显。另一方面，在运行应用程序和浏览菜单时，其像素化的显示效果会更加明显。

Teclast P50 除了多媒体用途和网上冲浪外，并不适合其他用途。由于其 Unisoc T606，它的性能储备勉强够用，只能流畅地描绘简单的游戏。如果你想用平板电脑拍照，那就只能忍受平庸的画质了。此外，充电速度慢和更新不明确也是它的缺点。

Teclast P50 的替代产品包括三星Galaxy Tab A9+和小米红米 Pad SE.这两款产品的价格相近，但速度都很快，并提供全高清显示屏。

价格和供应情况

在撰写本文时，Teclast P50 在许多网上商店都买不到。例如，您可以从阿里速卖通（AliExpress）购买，目前的价格为129.64 美元。.

Teclast P50 - 06/19/2024 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

78 / 98 → 80%

Keyboard

70 / 80 → 88%

Pointing Device

88%

Connectivity

39 / 69 → 56%

Weight

82 / 40-88 → 88%

Battery

89%

Display

69%

Games Performance

2 / 65 → 3%

Application Performance

43 / 92 → 47%

AI Performance

18%

Temperature

95%

Noise

100%

Audio

61 / 91 → 67%

Camera

51 / 90 → 57%

Average

47%

74%

Tablet - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
0%

Power Use
94.1%

Repairability
0%

Software Updates
0%

Total Sustainability Score: 15.7%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.