联想 ThinkBook 16 G7+ 评测--配备 AMD Zen 5 和 3.2K 显示屏的 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑升级版

Name: Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD
Brand: Lenovo

大量改进

联想推出的 ThinkBook 16 G7+ 是普通版 ThinkBook 16 的升级版，配备 AMD Zen 5 处理器，散热性能大幅提升，电池容量更大，3.2K 显示屏的 P3 覆盖率和 165 Hz 频率也更高。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 01/22/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AI AMD Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Wi-Fi 7 Windows Zen 5

结论：ThinkBook 16 G7+ 几乎在所有方面都更胜一筹

联想推出的 ThinkBook 16 G7+ 是其 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑的重大改进版。首先是更紧凑、更稳定的金属外壳，其次是更好的输入设备，包括出色的触觉触摸板、改进的 Wi-Fi 7 连接性以及为全新 AMD Zen 5 处理器配备的更强大的冷却系统。这款笔记本电脑拥有强劲的动力、快速的 iGPU 和 NPU，是一款具备所有先进人工智能功能的 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑。

虽然显示屏是普通 ThinkBook 16 G7 的薄弱环节之一，但全新的 3.2K IPS 雾面面板几乎在所有方面都令人印象深刻：P3 色彩空间（包括 sRGB 模式）、哑光表面、良好的图像质量、无 PWM 闪烁、快速响应时间和 165 Hz 频率。唯一可以改进的是亮度（约 400 cd/m²）。随着电池容量的增加，即使使用高分辨率显示屏，运行时间也还不错。

Test device courtesy of campuspoint.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

机箱提供两个完整的固态硬盘插槽，但内存是焊接的，无法扩展。大多数用户使用 32 GB 内存应该没有问题。我们对立体声扬声器有点失望，它看起来很薄，而且功率也不是特别大。总之，ThinkBook 16 G7+ 的整体性能还是不错的，优点多于缺点。

Pros

+ 坚固的金属外壳

+ 快速的 Zen 5 处理器

+ 出色的图像质量，无需 PWM

+ P3 色彩空间和 165 赫兹

+ 良好的键盘和出色的触觉触摸板

+ Wi-Fi 7 和 TB4

+ 2x M.2 2280 SSD

+ 良好的电池续航能力

Cons

- 焊接的内存

- 立体声扬声器效果差

- 不支持 HDR

- 1x USB 2.0

价格和供应情况

我们的联想 ThinkBook 16 G7+ 评测机型目前在亚马逊无货。

可能的替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Height	Display
1. 86.6%	Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $879.00 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 ARP 2... 2. $534.95 Lenovo 21MW0001US Thinkbook ... 3. $699.00 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 Busin... List Price: 1399€	1.9 kg	16.9 mm	16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI IPS
2. 81.9%	MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	List Price: 1599 Euro	2 kg	17.35 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS
3. 84.1%	Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $1,859.00 HIDevolution [2024] ASUS Zen... 2. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film ... 3. $1,899.00 ASUS Zenbook Pro 16 Laptop 1... List Price: 1700 EUR	1.5 kg	12.9 mm	16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED
4. 76.7%	Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $15.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector... 2. $15.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... 3. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film ... List Price: 1299 Euro	1.6 kg	17.8 mm	16.00" 3840x2400 283 PPI OLED
5. 89.7% ^{v7 (old)}	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $15.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... 2. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film ... 3. $20.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Clear Protecto... List Price: 957€	1.9 kg	15.9 mm	16.00" 3072x1920 226 PPI IPS

结论：ThinkBook 16 G7+ 几乎在所有方面都更胜一筹
规格
外壳和功能
输入设备--触觉触摸板
显示屏 - 165 Hz、3.2K IPS 面板，P3 覆盖率
性能 - AMD Zen 5，32 GB 内存
排放与能源
Notebookcheck 总体评分

联想推出的 ThinkBook 16 G7+ 是其大型多媒体笔记本电脑的改进版。虽然设计不变，但几乎所有其他组件都得到了改进。其中包括 AMD 的 Strix Point 处理器、高分辨率 3.2K 显示屏、散热更好的机箱和更大的电池。我们的评测设备配备了 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365并包括 Radeon 880M32 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘和 3.2K IPS 显示屏。

规格

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD

Processor

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 10 x 2 - 5 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 50 W PL1 / Sustained, Strix Point (Zen 5)

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon 880M, Core: 2900 MHz, RAM: 937 MHz, Adrenalin 24.12.1

Memory

32 GB

, LPDDR5x-7500, Dual-Channel, onboard

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 3200 x 2000 pixel 236 PPI, LEN160-3.2K, IPS, glossy: no, 165 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, 1024 GB

, 890 GB free

Soundcard

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 16.9 x 356 x 248

Battery

85 Wh, 5450 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: 1080p + IR with Privacy Shutter
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo (2x 2W), Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 100W PSU, Lenovo Vantage, 36 Months Warranty

Weight

1.913 kg, Power Supply: 406 g

Price

1399 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳和功能

从设计角度来看，ThinkBook 16 G7+ 与普通的 ThinkBook 16 G7不过，Plus 机型的底座也是铝制的。不过，Plus 机型的底座也是铝制的，这使设备具有更高的质感和稳定性。此外，Plus 机型的机身也更加紧凑，因为机壳没有那么深。整个内部结构也有所不同，因为除了更强的散热（包括第二个风扇）外，还安装了更大的电池。机箱内有两个 M.2 2280 固态硬盘空间，但内存是焊接的。

ThinkBook 提供足够数量的端口，包括 Thunderbolt 4 和 HDMI 2.1。Plus 机型在一个用于 USB 加密狗（如外接鼠标）的挡板后增加了一个 USB 2.0 端口。Wi-Fi 模块现在支持 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 5.4，在我们的标准化 Wi-Fi 测试中记录的传输速度非常出色。

AMD 处理器的 NPU 使这款电脑成为 Copilot+ PC，其中包括额外的人工智能功能，如网络摄像头的实时字幕和演播室特效。1080p 网络摄像头的图像质量仍然一般。除了用于面部识别的红外传感器外，还安装了机械快门。

尺寸比较

MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Medion S10 OLED Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W DIN A4 ❌

左：USB-C 3.2 Gen.2（10 Gbit/s、DisplayPort Alt 模式 1.4、Power Delivery）、USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 Gbit/s 供电）、HDMI 2.1、带 Thunderbolt 4 的 USB-C 4.0（40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort Alt 模式 1.4、Power Delivery 3.0）、3.5 毫米音频插孔

右侧USB-A 2.0（盖子后面）、SD 读卡器、USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 Gbit/s）、千兆以太网、Kensington Nano 安全系统

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	198 MB/s +137%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	121.6 (100.3^min - 135.39^max) MB/s +45%
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=61, last 2 years)	102.8 MB/s +23%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	83.6 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	260 MB/s +197%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	197.44 MB/s +125%
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=61, last 2 years)	142.9 MB/s +63%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	87.6 MB/s

Networking
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1819 (min: 1668) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1753 (min: 1704) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Qualcomm FastConnect 7800
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1613 (min: 800) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1753 (min: 1729) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1559 (min: 1508) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1725 (min: 1696) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	983 (min: 529) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1689 (min: 1670) MBit/s ∼96%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1177 (min: 955) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1651 (min: 1601) MBit/s ∼94%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	671 (min: 610) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	901 (min: 877) MBit/s ∼51%

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1819 (1668-1976)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1752 (1704-1775)

ColorChecker Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD: 8.4 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 13.87 ∆E

可持续性

ThinkBook 16 G7+ 通过了多项环保认证，如 "能源之星"（Energy Star）或 "EPEAT Gold"（EPEAT Gold），但联想没有提供任何有关碳足迹的信息。此外，该设备的包装是环保的，某些部分还使用了可回收材料。没有提供维护手册。

输入设备--触觉触摸板

基本上，发光键盘（也通过传感器）与普通的 ThinkBook 16 G7不过，更稳定的底座单元让打字更舒适。反馈精确而清晰，这意味着即使是较长的文本也能轻松输入。键盘布局有专门的上下翻页键和大尺寸方向键，专用数字键盘也不会引起任何问题。电源键位于键盘右上方，同时也是指纹扫描仪。

触摸板也进行了升级，采用了更大的玻璃表面触觉触摸板（13.5 x 8 厘米）。轻扫手势实现得非常漂亮，触摸板上的每个区域都可以点击，而且反馈和音量始终保持不变。

显示屏 - 165 Hz、3.2K IPS 面板，P3 覆盖率

显示屏是一块 16 英寸、宽高比为 16:10 的 IPS 面板，分辨率为 3,200 x 2,000 像素。这块磨砂屏幕的图像质量非常好（即使是明亮的区域也只会出现很小的颗粒），比普通的 ThinkBook 16 G7 有了很大的改进。所有内容都显示得非常清晰，色彩也很鲜艳，尽管与 OLED 面板相比还略显不足。不过，在反光或 PWM 闪烁方面没有任何问题。响应时间很快，由于频率为 165 Hz，运动也非常流畅。在黑暗的表面上，可以看到边缘有轻微的光渗出。

我们可以确认联想指定的亮度为 400 尼特，但微星或小米的竞争对手在这方面提供了更好的数值。黑色值为 0.3 cd/m²，对比度约为 1,400:1。亮度可根据环境自动调节，但色温无法调节。


394 cd/m²	401 cd/m²	407 cd/m²
397 cd/m²	422 cd/m²	401 cd/m²
400 cd/m²	409 cd/m²	399 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LEN160-3.2K tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 422 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 403.3 cd/m² Minimum: 4.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 422 cd/m²
Contrast: 1407:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9, calibrated: 0.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD LEN160-3.2K, IPS, 3200x2000, 16", 165 Hz	MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AUO28B2 (B160QAN02.N), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz	Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W ATNA60CL10-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz	Medion S10 OLED Samsung SDC4174, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 60 Hz	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, 3072x1920, 16", 165 Hz	Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz
Display		-2%	4%	6%	2%	-49%
Display P3 Coverage	96.3	94.6 -2%	99.8 4%	99.9 4%	98.8 3%	41.6 -57%
sRGB Coverage	100	99.7 0%	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%	61.2 -39%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	86.9	83.4 -4%	94.6 9%	98.6 13%	89.9 3%	43 -51%
Response Times		-9%	94%	83%	-157%	-97%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	13.9 ?(6.7, 7.2)	5.6 ?(1.8, 3.8) 60%	0.4 ?(0.3, 0.1) 97%	1.7 ?(0.9, 0.8) 88%	39.2 ?(15.8, 18.4) -182%	18.4 ?(10, 8.4) -32%
Response Time Black / White *	6.3 ?(2.5, 3.8)	11.2 ?(5.8, 5.4) -78%	0.6 ?(0.3, 0.3) 90%	1.4 ?(0.7, 0.7) 78%	14.6 ?(4.4, 10.2) -132%	16.5 ?(8.5, 8) -162%
PWM Frequency			480	60 ?(100)
Screen		-42%	142%	214%	-28%	-161%
Brightness middle	422	488 16%	391 -7%	307 -27%	520 23%	321.2 -24%
Brightness	403	444 10%	391 -3%	307 -24%	510 27%	319 -21%
Brightness Distribution	93	86 -8%	98 5%	96 3%	93 0%	92 -1%
Black Level *	0.3	0.36 -20%	0.02 93%	0.01 97%	0.35 -17%	0.37 -23%
Contrast	1407	1356 -4%	19550 1289%	30700 2082%	1486 6%	868 -38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.7	3.45 -103%	1.42 16%	2.1 -24%	2.9 -71%	8.7 -412%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.4	6.77 -99%	4.69 -38%	4.87 -43%	6.2 -82%	19.85 -484%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.7	1.35 -93%	1.49 -113%	2.08 -197%	1.1 -57%	1.82 -160%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.4	4.16 -73%	1.5 37%	0.9 62%	4.3 -79%	9.2 -283%
Gamma	2.19 ^100%	2.52 ^87%	2.199 ^100%	2.197 ^100%	2.19 ^100%	2.83 ^78%
CCT	6989 ^93%	6832 ^95%	6684 ^97%	6513 ^100%	7422 ^88%	6200 ^105%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-18% / -28%	80% / 106%	101% / 151%	-61% / -40%	-102% / -128%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对面板进行了分析，联想为我们提供了各种配置文件。P3 和 sRGB 配置文件都能提供良好的图像质量，色彩偏差较小，但色温有点过冷，还能看到轻微的蓝色色调。通过我们自己的校准（该配置文件可在上面免费下载），我们能够显著改善显示效果。加上完全覆盖 P3 和 sRGB 色彩空间，该面板还适用于编辑图像。

已校准 CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：P3，目标色彩空间：P3）

CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.5 ms rise
6.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.7 ms rise
13.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8684 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在室外，哑光面板的表现非常出色，但在非常明亮的环境中亮度可以更高一些。应避免直接光源或阳光的反射，但视角稳定性非常好。

性能 - AMD Zen 5，32 GB 内存

目前，ThinkBook 16 G7+ 只配备了 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365搭配无法扩展的 32 GB 内存（LPDDR5x-7500）。集成的 Radeon 880M GPU负责图形计算，不提供专用 GPU。

测试条件

联想提供了各种能源配置文件，它们也与 Windows 设置同步。我们使用自适应能耗模式（自动）进行了以下基准测试和测量，该模式默认为激活状态。如果你需要最大限度地发挥 CPU 多核性能，性能模式值得一试。不过，对于日常任务来说，省电模式完全足够，而且风扇噪音也明显降低。

能耗简介	CPU TDP	CB R23 Multi	Time Spy 图形	最大风扇容量
省电模式	29 瓦	14,868 分	3,131 分	32.5 分贝(A)
自适应节能模式（自动）	65/50 瓦	17,414 点	3,464 点	40.1 分贝(A)
性能	71/65 瓦	20,210 分	3,429 分	45.2 分贝(A)

处理器

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365属于当前的 Strix Point 代，总共使用了 10 个 Zen 5 核心，最高主频为 5 GHz（4x Zen 5 + 6x Zen 5c）。CPU 性能非常出色，最重要的是非常稳定，这意味着评测设备在自动模式下也领先于其他竞争对手。处理器酷睿至尊 7 155H在多核性能方面明显优于基准测试。使用电池供电时，该处理器的最大功耗为 52/35 瓦，因此多核性能下降了约 7%。其他 CPU 基准测试可在我们的技术部分。

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365: Ø2787 (2766.44-2842.32)

MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365: Ø2688 (2563.28-2772.58)

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365: Ø1724 (1686.84-1949.7)

Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2345 (2300.97-2382.8)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2433 (2259.12-2745.18)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U: Ø1495 (1392.95-1639.81)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	85.7 pt
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	82.7 pt
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	82.3 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	78.9 pt
Average of class Multimedia	74.8 pt
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	73.7 pt
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	71.8 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	54.3 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	18069 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	17414 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17401 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (11462 - 18748, n=5)	16878 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=105, last 2 years)	15824 Points -9%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	15564 Points -11%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	11462 Points -34%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	10096 (9532.62^min - 10096.1^max) Points -42%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	1998 Points
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	1992 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (1942 - 1998, n=5)	1981 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	1942 Points -3%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1801 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=97, last 2 years)	1774 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1759 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	1561 Points -22%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	7284 Points
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	7057 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (5247 - 7346, n=5)	6847 Points -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6671 Points -8%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6164 Points -15%
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11924, n=90, last 2 years)	5824 Points -20%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	5247 Points -28%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	3962 Points -46%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	787 Points
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	785 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (758 - 787, n=5)	779 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	758 Points -4%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	691 Points -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	667 Points -15%
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=90, last 2 years)	654 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	606 Points -23%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	2842 (2766.44^min - 2842.32^max) Points
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	2773 (2563.28^min - 2772.58^max) Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2745 (2259.12^min - 2745.18^max) Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (1950 - 2855, n=5)	2652 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 5224, n=97, last 2 years)	2489 Points -12%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2383 Points -16%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	1950 (1686.84^min - 1949.7^max) Points -31%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	1640 (1392.95^min - 1639.81^max) Points -42%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	306 Points
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	305 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (293 - 306, n=5)	302 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	293 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=92, last 2 years)	260 Points -15%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	259 Points -15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	256 Points -16%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	227 Points -26%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	328 Seconds * -87%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	270 Seconds * -54%
Average of class Multimedia (100 - 502, n=88, last 2 years)	248 Seconds * -42%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	203 Seconds * -16%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (175 - 270, n=5)	203 Seconds * -16%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	202 Seconds * -15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	190 Seconds * -9%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	175 Seconds *

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	70309 MIPS
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	68254 MIPS -3%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (47754 - 70309, n=5)	62627 MIPS -11%
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 130368, n=82, last 2 years)	61456 MIPS -13%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	60226 MIPS -14%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	58874 MIPS -16%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	47754 MIPS -32%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	39575 MIPS -44%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	6062 MIPS 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	6043 MIPS
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	6012 MIPS -1%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (5790 - 6062, n=5)	5967 MIPS -1%
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=82, last 2 years)	5737 MIPS -5%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5562 MIPS -8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5486 MIPS -9%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	4550 MIPS -25%

Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	14262 Points
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	14189 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (12627 - 14513, n=5)	13942 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 25760, n=72, last 2 years)	13825 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13501 Points -5%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	12627 Points -11%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11581 Points -19%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	8476 Points -41%

Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	2830 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (2778 - 2830, n=5)	2804 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	2782 Points
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	2778 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=68, last 2 years)	2715 Points -2%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2464 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2414 Points -13%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	2129 Points -23%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13276 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	13115 Points
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	12660 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (9599 - 13172, n=5)	12311 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=89, last 2 years)	12260 Points -7%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11269 Points -14%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	9599 Points -27%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	7672 Points -42%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (2062 - 2095, n=5)	2072 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	2070 Points
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	2066 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	2065 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=89, last 2 years)	1837 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1801 Points -13%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1796 Points -13%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	1581 Points -24%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	22.7 fps
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (18.6 - 22.7, n=5)	20.7 fps -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.5 fps -14%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	19.5 fps -14%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	18.6 fps -18%
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 34.3, n=81, last 2 years)	16.8 fps -26%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.7 fps -26%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	11.5 fps -49%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	59.5 s * -7%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	55.6 s *
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	54.9 s * +1%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (50.8 - 59.5, n=5)	54.6 s * +2%
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=84, last 2 years)	49.2 s * +12%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	48.2 s * +13%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	47.2 s * +15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45.7 s * +18%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U	0.555 sec * -32%
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=82, last 2 years)	0.4818 sec * -15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4692 sec * -12%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4675 sec * -11%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	0.4272 sec * -2%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (0.4142 - 0.4272, n=5)	0.4204 sec * -0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	0.4194 sec *
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	0.4142 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2842 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

253 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

306 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

7284 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

787 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1998 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

17414 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

115.8 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

1029 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	98 pt
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	96.1 pt
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	92 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	74.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia	72.8 pt
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69.6 pt
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	66.5 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	29420 KRay/s
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	28614 KRay/s -3%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (17096 - 29902, n=5)	26925 KRay/s -8%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	17096 KRay/s -42%
Average of class Multimedia (5121 - 50388, n=79, last 2 years)	15345 KRay/s -48%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	14712 KRay/s -50%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	14272 KRay/s -51%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	110908 Points
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	108501 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (61976 - 114482, n=5)	101980 Points -8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	77094 Points -30%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	76175 Points -31%
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 201874, n=80, last 2 years)	75932 Points -32%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	61976 Points -44%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	4786 MB/s
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	4676 MB/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (2951 - 4841, n=5)	4411 MB/s -8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3545 MB/s -26%
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 8623, n=80, last 2 years)	3511 MB/s -27%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3508 MB/s -27%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	2951 MB/s -38%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 181505, n=80, last 2 years)	91330 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (85333 - 93045, n=5)	88875 Points +3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	88106 Points +2%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	87502 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	86546 Points
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	85333 Points -1%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	78009 Points -10%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	16103 Points
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	15987 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (11586 - 16315, n=5)	15206 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	11586 Points -28%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10012 Points -38%
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=80, last 2 years)	9784 Points -39%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9030 Points -44%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	58762 Points
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	57916 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (33409 - 61298, n=5)	54527 Points -7%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	38466 Points -35%
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 105740, n=79, last 2 years)	37943 Points -35%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	37438 Points -36%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	33409 Points -43%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=80, last 2 years)	76149 MB/s +11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	72068 MB/s +5%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69238 MB/s +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	68484 MB/s
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	67856 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (47468 - 69801, n=5)	63662 MB/s -7%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	47468 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	1236 MB/s
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	1159 MB/s -6%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (706 - 1243, n=5)	1114 MB/s -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1041 MB/s -16%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1004 MB/s -19%
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 2022, n=80, last 2 years)	962 MB/s -22%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	706 MB/s -43%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	15940 KRay/s
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	15341 KRay/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (9061 - 16159, n=5)	14513 KRay/s -9%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	9061 KRay/s -43%
Average of class Multimedia (2759 - 26875, n=80, last 2 years)	8318 KRay/s -48%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7936 KRay/s -50%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7584 KRay/s -52%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	52218 MPixel/s +5%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	49843 MPixel/s 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	49841 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (47654 - 50517, n=5)	49623 MPixel/s 0%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	47654 MPixel/s -4%
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=80, last 2 years)	41249 MPixel/s -17%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	39025 MPixel/s -22%

系统性能

在日常使用中，ThinkBook 16 G7+ 的响应速度非常快，这一点也反映在基准测试结果中。在测试过程中，我们没有遇到任何系统稳定性问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	7596 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	7504 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (7045 - 7641, n=5)	7481 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7045 Points -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	6994 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=75, last 2 years)	6840 Points -9%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	6247 Points -17%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	11027 Points +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	10964 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (10421 - 11140, n=5)	10852 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	10562 Points
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=75, last 2 years)	10521 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10421 Points -1%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	9459 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	10186 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10150 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (9841 - 10293, n=5)	10107 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	10063 Points
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=75, last 2 years)	8981 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	8470 Points -16%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	8215 Points -18%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	10789 Points
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	10589 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (8973 - 10976, n=5)	10377 Points -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	9999 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=75, last 2 years)	9325 Points -14%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	8973 Points -17%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	8513 Points -21%

CrossMark / Overall
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1771 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1743 Points
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	1742 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (1658 - 1743, n=4)	1719 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=93, last 2 years)	1719 Points -1%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1699 Points -3%

CrossMark / Productivity
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1704 Points +7%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1656 Points +4%
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2042, n=93, last 2 years)	1626 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1599 Points
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	1596 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (1508 - 1599, n=4)	1574 Points -2%

CrossMark / Creativity
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	2073 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2070 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (2044 - 2074, n=4)	2065 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=93, last 2 years)	1938 Points -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1916 Points -7%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1803 Points -13%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1572 Points +17%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1539 Points +14%
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2094, n=93, last 2 years)	1435 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1347 Points
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	1345 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (1124 - 1360, n=4)	1294 Points -4%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (309 - 336, n=4)	321 Points +2%
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=89, last 2 years)	319 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	315 Points
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	309 Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	279 Points -11%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	256 Points -19%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	330 Points +28%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (255 - 330, n=6)	271 Points +5%
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=81, last 2 years)	263 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	257 Points
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	255 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	255 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	252 Points -2%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	234 Points -9%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	573 ms * -33%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	573 ms * -33%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	528 ms * -23%
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=93, last 2 years)	501 ms * -17%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	456 ms * -6%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	456 ms * -6%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (430 - 456, n=6)	443 ms * -3%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	433 ms * -1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	430 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		7504 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	93443 MB/s +7%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	90113 MB/s +3%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (87648 - 90113, n=5)	88927 MB/s +1%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	88745 MB/s +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	87648 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=80, last 2 years)	69824 MB/s -20%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	66880 MB/s -24%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	97880 MB/s
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	97219 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (89012 - 99376, n=5)	96452 MB/s -1%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	89012 MB/s -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	85824 MB/s -12%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	73708 MB/s -25%
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=80, last 2 years)	71145 MB/s -27%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	100507 MB/s +4%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (93627 - 100507, n=5)	96934 MB/s +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	96185 MB/s
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	95663 MB/s -1%
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=80, last 2 years)	70978 MB/s -26%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69181 MB/s -28%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	66061 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	140.2 ns * -21%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	139.9 ns * -21%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	129.8 ns * -12%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (116 - 129.8, n=5)	120.5 ns * -4%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	116.3 ns * -0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	116 ns *
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=80, last 2 years)	107.8 ns * +7%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试（上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，采用当前 BIOS 版本的评测设备在使用实时音频应用程序时显示出轻微的限制。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3298 μs * -112%
Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2995.3 μs * -93%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1554.3 μs *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	600.7 μs * +61%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	366.6 μs * +76%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

ThinkBook 16 G7+ 提供两个 PCIe 4.0 x4 连接的 M.2 2280 插槽。评测设备配备了一个小巧的三星 M.2 2242 固态硬盘（PM9C1a），存储容量为 1 TB。初始启动后，用户可使用 890 GB。三星固态硬盘的传输速度一般，即使在较长的负载情况下也能保持稳定。其他固态硬盘基准测试这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6181 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3821 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 477 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 431 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 70.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 157.9 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 383 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 638 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	85.5 pt
Average of class Multimedia	80.5 pt
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	71.1 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	69.9 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	68.9 pt
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	66.3 pt
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	58 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	3191 (3164.39^min - 3191.45^max) MB/s +60%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (1993 - 3434, n=11)	2965 MB/s +49%
Average of class Multimedia (888 - 4861, n=79, last 2 years)	2942 MB/s +48%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2421 (2387.4^min - 2420.55^max) MB/s +21%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2254 (2201.38^min - 2254.23^max) MB/s +13%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2049 (2028.99^min - 2049.34^max) MB/s +3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1993 (1977.4^min - 1993.34^max) MB/s
seq write
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	3259 (2970.55^min - 3258.99^max) MB/s +19%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	3229 (3069.6^min - 3229.15^max) MB/s +18%
Average of class Multimedia (463 - 5711, n=79, last 2 years)	3089 MB/s +13%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (2568 - 3445, n=11)	2939 MB/s +7%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2738 (2539.91^min - 2737.86^max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2729 (2601.73^min - 2729.02^max) MB/s 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2330 (2272.26^min - 2329.73^max) MB/s -15%
seq q8 t1 read
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (2467 - 6188, n=11)	5407 MB/s +119%
Average of class Multimedia (944 - 7126, n=79, last 2 years)	5352 MB/s +117%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	5093 (4325.8^min - 5093.35^max) MB/s +106%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	5035 (4487.49^min - 5035.47^max) MB/s +104%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3727 (3040.66^min - 3726.94^max) MB/s +51%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	3645 (2982.87^min - 3645.22^max) MB/s +48%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2467 (2389.7^min - 2466.67^max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Multimedia (555 - 6898, n=79, last 2 years)	4112 MB/s +27%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (3237 - 4698, n=11)	4065 MB/s +26%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3626 (3509.49^min - 3625.77^max) MB/s +12%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	3513 (3437.28^min - 3513.15^max) MB/s +9%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	3269 (3263.59^min - 3269^max) MB/s +1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	3237 (3057.86^min - 3237.16^max) MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2409 (2377.61^min - 2408.59^max) MB/s -26%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	66.3 (63.38^min - 66.31^max) MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 97.7, n=79, last 2 years)	63.3 MB/s -5%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (46.5 - 83.6, n=11)	61.5 MB/s -7%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	60.5 (59.69^min - 60.52^max) MB/s -9%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	55.9 (55.19^min - 55.86^max) MB/s -16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	54.8 (51.93^min - 54.84^max) MB/s -17%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	32.8 (32.29^min - 32.8^max) MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 write
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	206 (197.33^min - 206.13^max) MB/s +42%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	193 (186.4^min - 192.95^max) MB/s +33%
Average of class Multimedia (69.4 - 378, n=79, last 2 years)	169.9 MB/s +17%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	144.9 (135.4^min - 144.87^max) MB/s
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	144.3 (128.92^min - 144.27^max) MB/s 0%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	139.3 (133.75^min - 139.27^max) MB/s -4%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (69.4 - 165.9, n=11)	123.8 MB/s -15%
4k q32 t16 read
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1947 (1678.71^min - 1946.99^max) MB/s +267%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1684 (1639.23^min - 1684.06^max) MB/s +217%
Average of class Multimedia (295 - 4881, n=79, last 2 years)	1380 MB/s +160%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (387 - 1444, n=11)	815 MB/s +53%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	531 (520.88^min - 530.91^max) MB/s
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	529 (509.41^min - 528.85^max) MB/s 0%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	470 (452.58^min - 469.76^max) MB/s -11%
4k q32 t16 write
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2441 (2399.8^min - 2440.79^max) MB/s +656%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1142 (1093.19^min - 1142.3^max) MB/s +254%
Average of class Multimedia (192.1 - 4074, n=79, last 2 years)	1017 MB/s +215%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (230 - 613, n=11)	425 MB/s +32%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	328 (306.9^min - 328.4^max) MB/s +2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	323 (308.28^min - 323.04^max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	271 (259.81^min - 271.42^max) MB/s -16%

AS SSD
Score Total
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	6090 Points +60%
Average of class Multimedia (2033 - 9972, n=76, last 2 years)	5006 Points +32%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	4369 Points +15%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (3074 - 4794, n=11)	3920 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	3798 Points
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3398 Points -11%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	3137 Points -17%
Score Read
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2411 Points +137%
Average of class Multimedia (669 - 3501, n=76, last 2 years)	1612 Points +59%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1511 Points +49%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (887 - 1351, n=11)	1077 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1017 Points
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	951 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	936 Points -8%
Score Write
Average of class Multimedia (656 - 4813, n=76, last 2 years)	2629 Points +12%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2437 Points +4%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (1748 - 2825, n=11)	2346 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2343 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2107 Points -10%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2047 Points -13%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	1772 Points -24%
Seq Read
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	4484 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (837 - 5730, n=76, last 2 years)	4215 MB/s -6%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (2676 - 4734, n=11)	4091 MB/s -9%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	3976 MB/s -11%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3873.54 MB/s -14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3252 MB/s -27%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2868.99 MB/s -36%
Seq Write
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2908.39 MB/s +21%
Average of class Multimedia (414 - 5651, n=76, last 2 years)	2763 MB/s +15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2714 MB/s +13%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (1873 - 2934, n=11)	2620 MB/s +9%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	2412 MB/s
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2324.19 MB/s -4%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	2159 MB/s -10%
4K Read
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	68.68 MB/s +3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	66.5 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (56.9 - 75.5, n=11)	62.9 MB/s -5%
Average of class Multimedia (28.7 - 97.4, n=76, last 2 years)	61.4 MB/s -8%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	55.8 MB/s -16%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	48.19 MB/s -28%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	46.9 MB/s -29%
4K Write
Average of class Multimedia (66.5 - 328, n=76, last 2 years)	188.3 MB/s +1%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	186.11 MB/s 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	185.9 MB/s
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	184.1 MB/s -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	182.5 MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (148.9 - 228, n=11)	178.8 MB/s -4%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	178.65 MB/s -4%
4K-64 Read
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	2055.8 MB/s +310%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1138 MB/s +127%
Average of class Multimedia (350 - 2989, n=76, last 2 years)	1129 MB/s +125%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (350 - 815, n=11)	605 MB/s +21%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	502 MB/s
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	500.47 MB/s 0%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	498 MB/s -1%
4K-64 Write
Average of class Multimedia (411 - 4265, n=76, last 2 years)	2165 MB/s +13%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	1967.43 MB/s +3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	1916 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (1281 - 2365, n=11)	1908 MB/s 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1653 MB/s -14%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1628.92 MB/s -15%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	1372 MB/s -28%
Access Time Read
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.076 ms * -171%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	0.07 ms * -150%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (0.025 - 0.12, n=11)	0.06564 ms * -134%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	0.061 ms * -118%
Average of class Multimedia (0.018 - 0.15, n=76, last 2 years)	0.05462 ms * -95%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	0.028 ms *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.022 ms * +21%
Access Time Write
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.102 ms * -386%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.101 ms * -381%
Average of class Multimedia (0.013 - 0.414, n=76, last 2 years)	0.05939 ms * -183%
Average Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB (0.018 - 0.079, n=11)	0.04191 ms * -100%
Medion S10 OLED Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	0.028 ms * -33%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	0.022 ms * -5%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	0.021 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2422 (2235.14-2534.16)

图形卡

迚ケ谿オ譎る俣 Radeon-880M-GPU是一款快速的集成显卡，非常适合日常任务，包括播放高分辨率视频。合成基准测试结果符合预期，在连续负载和使用电池供电的情况下性能都很稳定。

880M GPU 也适用于游戏，当然，你不应对这方面抱有过高的期望。目前的游戏如《赛博朋克 2077》运行相当流畅，但你必须降低分辨率和细节。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	100 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	66.9 pt
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	66 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	64.3 pt
Average AMD Radeon 880M	60.9 pt
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	54.1 pt
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	44.3 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=81, last 2 years)	20888 Points +33%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	15744 Points
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	15428 Points -2%
Average AMD Radeon 880M (12321 - 15744, n=6)	14478 Points -8%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13381 Points -15%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	12439 Points -21%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9156 Points -42%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=84, last 2 years)	14961 Points +55%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	9651 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9650 Points 0%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	9462 Points -2%
Average AMD Radeon 880M (7404 - 9651, n=6)	8774 Points -9%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	7538 Points -22%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6365 Points -34%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=85, last 2 years)	5683 Points +64%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3656 Points +6%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	3464 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	3464 Points
Average AMD Radeon 880M (2300 - 3464, n=6)	3110 Points -10%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	2970 Points -14%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2643 Points -24%

3DMark 11 Performance		14998 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		8919 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		3856 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		572 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		3281 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	429 Seconds * -59%
Average of class Multimedia (160 - 946, n=90, last 2 years)	415 Seconds * -54%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	347 Seconds * -29%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	344 Seconds * -27%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	334 Seconds * -24%
Average AMD Radeon 880M (269 - 429, n=6)	332 Seconds * -23%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Radeon 880M, AMD Ryzen AI 9 365	270 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia	100 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	70.8 pt
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	58.5 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	55.7 pt
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	47 pt
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	39.7 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Multimedia (8.26 - 86, n=60, last 2 years)	35.7 fps +37%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	26.1 (21.1^min) fps
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	25.8 (21.5^min) fps -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	21.2 (12.2^min) fps -19%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	20 (16^min) fps -23%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	14.2 (11.8^min) fps -46%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Multimedia (9.1 - 117.7, n=48, last 2 years)	45.7 fps +48%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	30.9 fps
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	27 fps -13%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	17.6 (7.48^min, 8.78^P0.1, 12.3^P1) fps -43%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	14.7 (8.76^min, 8.87^P0.1, 9.07^P1) fps -52%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 141.6, n=85, last 2 years)	54.6 fps +64%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	33.3 (6.86^min, 23.3^P1) fps
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	31.2 (2.11^min, 21.7^P1) fps -6%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	27.5 (1.477^min, 18.2^P1) fps -17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	15.9 (2.93^min, 11.4^P1) fps -52%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	11.4 (1.718^min, 8.77^P1) fps -66%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=85, last 2 years)	52.9 fps +61%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	32.9 fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	30.6 fps -7%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	28.7 fps -13%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	25.1 fps -24%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	20.9 fps -36%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=84, last 2 years)	91.6 fps +60%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	57.1 (22.5^min, 30.7^P1) fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	53 fps -7%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	49.9 (15.3^min, 20.3^P1) fps -13%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	44.2 (7.8^min, 23^P1) fps -23%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	35.6 (5^min, 6.04^P1) fps -38%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 179.9, n=86, last 2 years)	97.4 fps +5%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	92.5 (80.4^min) fps
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	79.8 (51.5^min) fps -14%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	60.6 (38.4^min) fps -34%
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	45.9 (33.4^min) fps -50%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	29 (15.8^min) fps -69%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 141.1, n=84, last 2 years)	67.7 fps +34%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	50.4 fps
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	44.2 fps -12%
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	39.8 fps -21%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	32.4 fps -36%
Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	30.2 fps -40%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M: Ø25 (22.3-25.9)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	164.2	160.9	81	33.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	167.9	137.5	110.8	92.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	91.8	46	32.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	86	67	50.4
Strange Brigade (2018)	196	80.3	68.2	57.1
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	49.3	38.2	31.2	30.9
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	50.6	39.3	30.1	26.1

排放与能源

噪音排放

在运行简单任务时，ThinkBook 是一款非常安静的设备，即使在负载情况下，两个风扇的噪音也非常小。在自动模式下，我们在玩游戏和压力测试时测得的噪音为 40 dB(A)，虽然可以听到，但并不令人分心。在性能模式下，噪音为 45.2 dB(A)，而在省电模式下，我们测得的最大噪音为 32.5 dB(A)。评测设备没有发出其他噪音。

Noise Level

Idle		24.5 / 24.5 / 25.9 dB(A)
Load		36.2 / 40.1 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.5 dB(A)

	Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
Noise		0%	4%	-10%	3%
off / environment *	24.5	23 6%	24 2%	25 -2%	24.4 -0%
Idle Minimum *	24.5	23 6%	24 2%	26 -6%	24.4 -0%
Idle Average *	24.5	23 6%	25 -2%	27 -10%	24.4 -0%
Idle Maximum *	25.9	25.02 3%	26 -0%	28 -8%	24.4 6%
Load Average *	36.2	41.88 -16%	35 3%	43 -19%	32 12%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	40.1	39.79 1%	36 10%	42 -5%
Load Maximum *	40.1	41.88 -4%	36 10%	48 -20%	39.7 1%
Witcher 3 ultra *					30.6

* ... smaller is better

温度

联想成功地控制了表面温度。在空闲运行或执行简单任务时，表面几乎不会发热，即使是在游戏或压力测试中也是如此，虽然我们的记录从未超过 38 °C，但风扇的转速可以稍慢一些。在压力测试中，处理器的功耗很快就降到了 50 瓦，并保持稳定。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


36.6 °C	37.7 °C	32.6 °C
36.5 °C	38.2 °C	33 °C
30 °C	31.5 °C	29.2 °C

Maximum: 38.2 °C
Average: 33.9 °C


37.8 °C	37.9 °C	37.2 °C
32.8 °C	36.5 °C	36.2 °C
29.5 °C	32 °C	30.9 °C

Maximum: 37.9 °C
Average: 34.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 48.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


25.4 °C	25.3 °C	25.1 °C
24.4 °C	25.3 °C	24.8 °C
24.6 °C	24.1 °C	24.4 °C

Maximum: 25.4 °C
Average: 24.8 °C


25.7 °C	25.7 °C	25.7 °C
25.1 °C	25.4 °C	25.3 °C
24.4 °C	24.8 °C	24.8 °C

Maximum: 25.7 °C
Average: 25.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 28.7 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


35.2 °C	36.8 °C	32.5 °C
36.3 °C	38.5 °C	32 °C
30.1 °C	29.8 °C	29.1 °C

Maximum: 38.5 °C
Average: 33.4 °C


37.1 °C	37.9 °C	37.5 °C
33.8 °C	37 °C	37.3 °C
30 °C	32.4 °C	31.9 °C

Maximum: 37.9 °C
Average: 35 °C

Power Supply (max.) 47.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.5 °C / 88.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).

	Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M	Medion S10 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Heat		-18%	-28%	-36%	-10%
Maximum Upper Side *	38.2	52 -36%	48 -26%	55 -44%	40.3 -5%
Maximum Bottom *	37.9	44 -16%	53 -40%	55 -45%	45.9 -21%
Idle Upper Side *	25.4	28 -10%	31 -22%	32 -26%	26.3 -4%
Idle Bottom *	25.7	28 -9%	32 -25%	33 -28%	27.9 -9%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

立体声扬声器是 ThinkBook 16 G7+ 为数不多的弱点之一。高音和中音清晰，有助于语音重现，但模块缺乏冲击力和低音。这使得声音显得相当单薄，尤其是在音乐和电影方面。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.02 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Medion S10 OLED audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

耗电量

高分辨率屏幕在空闲时的功耗测量中可见一斑，因为在全亮度下，我们测得的功耗约为 14 瓦。在压力测试中，我们短暂测得 103 瓦，但很快就降到了 83 瓦左右。即使在玩游戏时，我们也测得约 80 瓦。因此，100 瓦的电源大小是合适的。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.35 / 0.56 Watt
Idle	6.4 / 14.1 / 14.3 Watt
Load	83.4 / 102.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB	MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW	Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	Medion S10 OLED Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB
Power Consumption		8%	33%	15%	11%
Idle Minimum *	6.4	6.9 -8%	6 6%	7 -9%	4.2 34%
Idle Average *	14.1	12 15%	7 50%	10 29%	11.6 18%
Idle Maximum *	14.3	12.5 13%	13 9%	19 -33%	12.3 14%
Load Average *	83.4	79.8 4%	44 47%	52 38%	61.9 26%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	79.8	62.5 22%	44.6 44%	53.2 33%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	77.5	74.5 4%		49.2 37%
Load Maximum *	102.9	96 7%	58 44%	95 8%	140.6 -37%
Witcher 3 ultra *					57

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø84.7 (82.8-102.9)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø10.4 (9.52-11.6)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø79.8 (69.9-83.2)

Power consumption with an external monitor

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø74.9 (73.1-92.7)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø83.2 (73.1-94.8)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31.6 (24.5-47.5)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø77.7 (74.1-95.7)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø66.5 (62.7-69.5)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø8.39 (7.43-9.67)

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø77.5 (71-79.8)

电池寿命

电池容量从 ThinkBook 16 G7增加到 Plus 机型的 85 Wh。因此，3.2K 显示屏更高的功耗完全可以得到补偿。在 150 cd/m²（相当于评测设备最大亮度的 69%）的 Wi-Fi 测试中，我们测得将近 11 个小时，比普通机型多出 2 个小时。我们在全亮度下记录了 7.5 小时，在视频测试中记录了近 14 小时。在对比组中，只有红米本 16 的续航时间明显更长。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		10h 49min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		7h 28min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 52min

	Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 85 Wh	MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 82 Wh	Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 78 Wh	Medion S10 OLED Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99 Wh	Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 45 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		-11%	11%	-33%	54%	-19%	-1%
H.264	832	609 -27%			1308 57%		842 ?(319 - 1481, n=56, last 2 years) 1%
WiFi v1.3	649	683 5%	722 11%	436 -33%	983 51%	528 -19%	631 ?(262 - 1204, n=90, last 2 years) -3%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Back to the verdict

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD - 01/19/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

87 / 98 → 89%

Keyboard

91%

Pointing Device

98%

Connectivity

83 / 80 → 100%

Weight

64 / 20-74 → 81%

Battery

89 / 95 → 93%

Display

87%

Games Performance

56 / 88 → 64%

Application Performance

86 / 92 → 94%

Temperature

92%

Noise

88 / 95 → 92%

Audio

70%

Camera

38 / 75 → 51%

Average

69%

87%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
100%

Power Use
80.8%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 48.9%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 119 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 482342 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想 ThinkBook 16 G7+ 评测--配备 AMD Zen 5 和 3.2K 显示屏的 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑升级版

Andreas Osthoff, 2025-01-22 (Update: 2025-01-22)

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparison
Asus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min) N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	91
...
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1022
Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1024
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-978P Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1027
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	1029
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-78-100,	1033
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, M3 Pro 18-Core GPU	1059
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	1062
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	14864
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US R5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M	14867
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	14890
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M	14998
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	15041
i9-14900K, Arc A380	15095
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	15153
...
(max) R7 9800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	77609

结论：ThinkBook 16 G7+ 几乎在所有方面都更胜一筹

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

可能的替代品比较

Table of Contents

规格

外壳和功能

尺寸比较

可持续性

输入设备--触觉触摸板

显示屏 - 165 Hz、3.2K IPS 面板，P3 覆盖率

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - AMD Zen 5，32 GB 内存

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

大容量存储器

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

排放与能源

噪音排放

温度

发言人

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD audio analysis

MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HMG-036 audio analysis

Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W audio analysis

Medion S10 OLED audio analysis

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 audio analysis

耗电量

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Power consumption with an external monitor

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Transparency