联想 ThinkBook 16 G7 IML 笔记本电脑评测:经济实惠又专业
适合有预算意识的家庭办公室。
如果你不需要传统 ThinkPad 的所有花哨而昂贵的功能,那么 ThinkBook 16 G7 可以为你省下一大笔钱,尤其是在中小企业应用中。其高效的酷睿Ultra 5处理器是一大亮点,而基本的1200p面板则需要升级。Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
结论 - 优化满足基本办公需求
ThinkBook 16 G7 并没有什么特别令人兴奋的功能,但这并不影响它的价格。它是一款安静的机器,具备所有办公基本功能,包括集成数字键盘、隐私快门、各种端口、Kensington 锁、易维护性以及英特尔和 AMD 的现代 CPU。此外,它的外观时尚轻巧,适合偶尔外出旅行,在专业环境中也不会显得过于华丽或显眼。对于大多数用户来说,这些功能可能足以满足他们的日常需求。
不过,作为一款经济型笔记本电脑,该机型仍然存在一些常见的问题,包括色彩覆盖范围有限和图形性能较弱,尤其是在基本配置水平上。因此,升级到 1600p 显示屏可能是值得的,但如果用户需要更宽广的 P3 色彩,则必须另寻他处,如价格更高的 ThinkPad 或 XPS 系列.我们认为,在不影响系统价格的情况下,还可以改进的一个方面是键盘,因为对于一款专为办公任务和文字处理而设计的机型来说,键盘的按键反馈太浅、太软。其他经济型替代产品,如 华硕 VivoBook 系列 甚至 惠普Pavilion Plus 系列在这方面做得更好。
Pros
Cons
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $778.40 List Price: 750 USD | 1.8 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP AMD Ryzen 5 7530U ⎘ AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $698.75 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP 2... 2. $1,339.00 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP L... 3. $899.00 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP L... List Price: 749€ | 1.8 kg | 17.5 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: $1,539.53 List Price: 1600 USD | 2.1 kg | 16.85 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $899.00 ASUS Vivobook S 15 Laptop; C... 2. $999.00 ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED Lapt... 3. $831.49 ASUS Vivobook S 15 S5506MA L... | 1.6 kg | 16 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $146.99 LCDOLED Replacement for HP E... 2. $49.91 Original New for HP Envy x36... 3. $805.00 HP Envy X360 16" Ultra 7 AI ... List Price: 1300 USD | 1.8 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,499.99 List Price: 1300 USD | 2.2 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
ThinkBook 16 G7 直接取代了 ThinkBook 16 G6将 Alder Lake 和 Zen 3 U 系列处理器换成速度更快的 Meteor Lake 和 Zen 3 HS 系列处理器。除此之外,两款机型在外观上完全相同。
我们的测试机是低端配置,配备酷睿至尊 5 125U 和 1200p IPS 显示屏,售价约 750 美元。更高端的英特尔配置包括酷睿至尊 7 155H,配备速度更快的集成 Arc 8 图形处理器和分辨率更高的 1600p 120 Hz 显示屏。
ThinkBook 16 G7 的替代产品包括其他面向预算的办公或多媒体笔记本电脑,如 惠普Pavilion 16华硕 Vivobook S16 或 戴尔 Inspiron 16.
更多联想评论:
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
案例 - 适合办公室使用
我们的 关于 ThinkBook 16 G6 的评论也适用于 ThinkBook 16 G7,因为机身保持不变。双色铝盖设计与其他 ThinkBook 机型一致,与颜色更深、更专业的 ThinkPad 机型形成鲜明对比。不过,底座采用了更多的塑料材质,当你真正打开原本美观的盖子时,会有一种廉价的感觉。
尺寸和重量在 16 英寸机型中属于中等水平。不过,在尺寸和重量几乎相同的情况下,还有更多功能的 16 英寸可转换机可供选择,如 HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16.
连接性
与去年搭载 AMD 技术的 G6 机型不同,我们的 G7 机型支持 Thunderbolt 4 设备。我们很高兴有多个 USB-A、USB-C 和视频输出端口,这样在办公室里连接配件就更方便了。
SD 读卡器
SD 读卡器性能保持在 90 MB/s。将 1 GB 的照片从我们的 UHS-II 测试卡移动到桌面大约需要 13 秒,比许多其他廉价笔记本电脑(如华硕 Vivobook S16)要快 2 倍或 3 倍以上。
需要注意的是,与大多数其他笔记本电脑不同,SD 卡插入时会突出一半以上的长度。因此,建议将卡取出,以免在运输过程中损坏。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M |
交流
英特尔 AX203 标配 Wi-Fi 6 和蓝牙 5.2 连接。不支持 Wi-Fi 6E 和 Wi-Fi 7 可能是为了节省成本。
网络摄像头
摄像头质量保持不变,最高可达 200 万像素或 1080p30 视频。私人快门是标准配置,而红外则是可选配置,以节省成本。
维护
塑料底板由九颗十字螺丝固定,便于拆卸。如下图所示,ThinkBook 16 G7 和 G6 机型的内部差异不大。
可持续性
联想宣称,在制造电池组外壳、键帽、扬声器和 USB-C 交流适配器时,分别使用了 25%、50%、30% 和 90% 的 PCC 可回收塑料。尽管笔记本电脑和线缆采用了塑料包装,但包装还是通过了 FSC 认证。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外,没有其他附件。如果在美国购买,制造商通常提供一年有限保修。
输入设备
键盘和触摸板
我们对 ThinkBook 16 G6 键盘和触控板的评价也适用于 G7 机型。令人遗憾的是,打字体验更接近于 IdeaPad 系列,而不是卓越的 ThinkPad 系列这意味着键程和反馈分别较浅和较弱。同样,点击触控板的反馈也是软绵绵的,让人感觉很不满意。
显示屏 - 1200p 选项并不出众
有以下三种显示方式可供选择。我们的测试机配备了黑体选项。
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,60 Hz,60% sRGB,300 nits,非触摸屏
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,60 Hz,60% sRGB,300 nits,触摸屏
- 2560 x 1600,IPS,120 赫兹,100% sRGB,350 尼特,非触摸屏
1200p 选项似乎与 ThinkBook 16 G6 随附的选项相同。虽然黑白响应时间还算不错,但色彩覆盖范围窄,原生刷新率为 60 Hz,是一款经济型面板。我们建议尽可能升级到 1600p 选项,以获得色彩更丰富、更清晰的观看体验,尤其是如果你打算编辑照片或视频的话。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 321.2 cd/m²
Contrast: 868:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.82
ΔE Greyscale 9.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
43% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.83
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG AU Optronics B16QAN02.N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 AU Optronics B160QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Samsung ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | 98% | 109% | 75% | 108% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.6 | 40.4 -3% | 96.8 133% | 99.6 139% | 76 83% | 98.7 137% |
sRGB Coverage | 61.2 | 59.8 -2% | 99.8 63% | 100 63% | 99.8 63% | 99.7 63% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43 | 42 -2% | 84.7 97% | 96.5 124% | 76.7 78% | 96.5 124% |
Response Times | -62% | 38% | 96% | -23% | 58% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 18.4 ? | 32.8 ? -78% | 12.9 ? 30% | 0.8 ? 96% | 25.6 ? -39% | 0.68 ? 96% |
Response Time Black / White * | 16.5 ? | 23.9 ? -45% | 8.9 ? 46% | 0.89 ? 95% | 17.6 ? -7% | 13.2 ? 20% |
PWM Frequency | 491.8 ? | 240 ? | ||||
Screen | -5% | 44% | 44% | 37% | 26% | |
Brightness middle | 321.2 | 310 -3% | 475.4 48% | 399.4 24% | 314.7 -2% | 353 10% |
Brightness | 319 | 290 -9% | 440 38% | 405 27% | 291 -9% | 354 11% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 86 -7% | 89 -3% | 98 7% | 89 -3% | 98 7% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.22 41% | 0.36 3% | 0.28 24% | ||
Contrast | 868 | 1409 62% | 1321 52% | 1124 29% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.7 | 6.2 29% | 2.99 66% | 4.05 53% | 1.62 81% | 4.23 51% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.85 | 24.7 -24% | 7.64 62% | 6.69 66% | 2.94 85% | 7.13 64% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.82 | 5.3 -191% | 0.74 59% | 1.02 44% | 1.08 41% | 2.42 -33% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.2 | 3.8 59% | 2.9 68% | 1.1 88% | 1.3 86% | 2.5 73% |
Gamma | 2.83 78% | 2.22 99% | 2.31 95% | 2.27 97% | 2.26 97% | 2.4 92% |
CCT | 6200 105% | 6011 108% | 6472 100% | 6419 101% | 6385 102% | 6642 98% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -23% /
-12% | 60% /
54% | 83% /
69% | 30% /
36% | 64% /
52% |
* ... smaller is better
1200p 面板没有经过预校准。开箱后色温太低,平均 DeltaE 值也相当高。使用 X-Rite 色差计自行校准显示屏可将平均灰度和色彩 deltaE 值分别从 9.2 和 8.7 提高到 0.8 和 1.82。不过,正如上一节所述,由于色域有限,在饱和度较高的情况下,色彩仍然会变得越来越不准确。我们的校准 ICM 配置文件可在上面免费下载。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
16.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.5 ms rise | |
↘ 8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
18.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
↘ 8.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
户外能见度在经济型产品中属于中等水平。300 尼特的最大亮度与更昂贵的 ThinkPad T16 G2亮度可提高 50%。
性能 - 核心 U,只为基础
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 和 Vantage 都设置为性能模式。令人恼火的是,Vantage 上的电源模式与 Windows 上的电源模式并不同步,因此有可能将 Vantage 设置为 "节能 "模式,而将 Windows 设置为 "性能 "模式。请记住,Vantage 电源配置文件优先于 Windows 设置。用户应该熟悉预装的 Vantage 软件,因为它是调整联想特定功能和 BIOS 更新的中心。
处理器
酷睿至尊 5 125U 酷睿至尊 5 125U取代了上一代 酷睿 i5-1335U但期待它运行速度更快的用户可能会失望,因为它们之间的性能几乎相同。事实上,较早的酷睿 i5-1335U 在 联想 ThinkPad E16 G1在单线程负载下甚至可以快 10%。为了弥补这一不足,酷睿至尊 5 12U 集成了一个 NPU,用于加速人工智能应用,但第一代英特尔 NPU 与 Co-Pilot+ 不兼容,这一点是臭名昭著的。
在循环运行 CineBench R15 xT 时,时钟频率的可持续性很好,性能只会随着时间的推移而略有下降。需要更快处理器的用户可以考虑升级到 酷睿至尊 7 155U或 Core Ultra 7 155H配置,性能分别提高 10% 和 30%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (5784 - 9282, n=7) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (29578 - 47366, n=7) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (1565 - 2669, n=7) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (44976 - 47868, n=7) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (4390 - 5507, n=7) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (14563 - 24922, n=7) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (33640 - 48114, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (457 - 779, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (2904 - 4846, n=7) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (24082 - 47875, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
系统性能
PCMark 结果略低于竞争对手,因为如上所述,酷睿至尊 5 125U 的速度并不比大多数中端 U 系列 CPU 快多少。此外,由于我们使用的是 16 GB 单通道内存,AIDA64 内存性能较慢。幸运的是,用户可以根据需要添加第二根内存条,以获得双通道性能。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (5639 - 6052, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (9582 - 10827, n=7) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (7548 - 8306, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (6367 - 6690, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
CrossMark / Overall | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1363 - 1648, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1310 - 1382, n=7) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1433 - 1550, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1066 - 1244, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (237 - 253, n=7) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (224 - 231, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (579 - 594, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 5761 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (35467 - 82786, n=7) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (38849 - 63159, n=7) | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (36830 - 63484, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (125.5 - 149.8, n=7) | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开主页的多个浏览器标签页时,LatencyMon 会显示轻微的 DPC 问题。在其他方面,以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频非常完美,仅在测试开始时出现过一次丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG | |
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备配备了相同的 SK Hynix HFS512GEJ4X112NPCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘。 ThinkBook 14 二合一 G4.如下图所示,它甚至表现出相同的节流行为,表明其 5000 MB/s 的最大传输速率在受压时是不可持续的。因此,该硬盘可能需要使用散热器。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP | |
Asus Vivobook S16 S5606M -11! | |
MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG -11! | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
综合 弧形 4与 Iris Xe 96 EUs因此,如果用户升级到我们的酷睿 Ultra 5 125U 配置,性能不会有明显提升。事实上,即使是 Core Ultra 7 155U 配置,预计也只能带来 15% 到 20% 的图形性能提升。如果想获得更明显的升级,性能猎手或休闲游戏玩家可以考虑 Core Ultra 155H 配置,它配备了 弧 8性能提升 2 倍。
使用电池供电不会影响性能。Fire Strike 电池测试的结果与电源测试的结果基本相同。
3DMark 11 Performance | 6497 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20983 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3951 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1841 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
除非您主要玩DOTA 2 或LoL 等要求不高的游戏,否则 Arc 4 即使设置为最低,也不足以以可观的帧速率玩最新的游戏。不过,升级到 Arc 8 后,就能以 1080p 的低设置和 30 FPS 的帧数畅玩大多数游戏了。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 104.8 | 88.8 | 20.7 | 8.01 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 90.8 | 55.5 | 50.2 | 47 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 33.7 | 19.5 | 14.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 39.2 | 30.4 | 25.1 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 40 | 21 | 20 | 18 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 72.8 | 32.3 | 26.5 | 22.8 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 26.4 | 20.4 | 13.7 | 11.2 |
F1 22 (2022) | 39.2 | 36.8 | 27.6 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 15.1 | 12.4 | 10.5 | 10.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 18.8 | 15.1 | 12.4 | 11.1 |
排放量
系统噪音
低噪音风扇是该系统的一大亮点。在桌面上空转时,甚至在一段时间内运行中等负载(如3DMark 06 第一个 90 秒的基准测试场景)时,风扇几乎保持静音。当设置为 "性能 "模式,CPU 使用率为 100% 时,风扇噪音徘徊在 32 dB(A) 以上,在典型的办公环境中几乎听不到风扇噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.1 / 23.1 / 23.1 dB(A) |
Load |
| 23.2 / 32.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.1 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 125U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP Vega 7, R5 7530U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365 | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02 | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -13% | -34% | -6% | -17% | -34% | |
off / environment * | 23.1 | 24.3 -5% | 23.8 -3% | 22.9 1% | 23.8 -3% | 20.96 9% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.1 | 24.3 -5% | 25 -8% | 23 -0% | 24.2 -5% | 25.28 -9% |
Idle Average * | 23.1 | 24.3 -5% | 25 -8% | 23 -0% | 24.2 -5% | 25.28 -9% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.1 | 24.3 -5% | 29.5 -28% | 23 -0% | 24.2 -5% | 25.28 -9% |
Load Average * | 23.2 | 29.7 -28% | 37.5 -62% | 23.8 -3% | 28.9 -25% | 51.88 -124% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 29.2 | 46.5 -59% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 32.6 | 41.4 -27% | 56.1 -72% | 43.8 -34% | 51 -56% | 51.8 -59% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 32.1 | 43.8 | 51 | 49 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于冷却解决方案的位置,系统左半部分的温度高于右半部分。不过,键盘面(C 侧)的热点要比底盖(D 侧)的热点凉爽得多,在运行高负载时,两者的温差可高达 8 摄氏度。因此,在使用 ThinkBook 时,手掌和手指的温度不会让人感到不适。
相比之下,去年的 ThinkBook 16 G6的热点温度可高达 50 摄氏度。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.3 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 21.8 °C / 71.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+5.8 °C / 10.5 F).
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Intel Core Ultra 5 125U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -26% | -26% | -17% | -24% | -41% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 33.2 | 40.8 -23% | 52.8 -59% | 42.6 -28% | 43.4 -31% | 42.6 -28% |
Maximum Bottom * | 41.2 | 50.5 -23% | 42 -2% | 47.8 -16% | 41.6 -1% | 48.4 -17% |
Idle Upper Side * | 23.4 | 29.3 -25% | 30.6 -31% | 27.4 -17% | 32.8 -40% | 39.4 -68% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.6 | 35.2 -32% | 29.6 -11% | 27.8 -5% | 32.4 -22% | 39.8 -50% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在运行 Prime95 压力测试时,CPU 会升至 3.2 GHz、48 W 和高达 100 C,持续时间仅约 30 秒。U 系列处理器无法长时间维持较高的 Turbo Boost 时钟,但这也意味着要求更高的 Core Ultra 7 155H 配置可能会运行得更热或更响,或面临更严重的节流风险,因为我们的 U 系列 CPU 在负载下已经相当热了。
在运行《赛博朋克 2077》(Cyberpunk 2077)来代表典型的压力负载时,核心温度将稳定在 75 C 到 80 C 之间,而在性能更强的 AMD 处理器上,核心温度仅略低于 70 C。 HP Envy x360 16.
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 47 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.2 | -- | 80 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.9 | 1850 | 80 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 0.7 | 1800 | 75 |
发言人
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
我们在上文提到,酷睿至尊 5 125U 的速度并不比其 U 系列竞争对手快多少。不过,英特尔 CPU 的功耗普遍较低,因此仍能获得较高的每瓦性能。例如,运行 Prime95 平均耗电约 44 瓦,而使用 Ryzen 5 的 ThinkBook 16 G6尽管两款机型的性能水平相似。在运行 FurMark 对各自的集成 GPU 施加压力时,英特尔的功耗差距略大。
当 CPU 处于满载状态时,我们可以记录到小巧(约 9 x 4.5 x 2.6 厘米)的 65 W USB-C AC 适配器的最大功耗为 67 W。不过,由于散热限制,这一耗电量并不是无限的,如下图所示。
Off / Standby | 0.41 / 0.69 Watt |
Idle | 4.3 / 8.9 / 9.1 Watt |
Load |
31.7 / 66.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP R5 7530U, Vega 7, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, KIOXIA BG5 KBG50ZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 2% | -50% | -20% | -54% | -185% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.3 | 3.7 14% | 5.4 -26% | 5 -16% | 4.2 2% | 21.06 -390% |
Idle Average * | 8.9 | 7.1 20% | 11 -24% | 6.2 30% | 6.9 22% | 24.27 -173% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.1 | 7.7 15% | 11.2 -23% | 14.7 -62% | 15.2 -67% | 25.12 -176% |
Load Average * | 31.7 | 43.9 -38% | 76.6 -142% | 49.9 -57% | 70.4 -122% | 52.4 -65% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 35.2 | 49.2 -40% | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 39.4 | 61.1 -55% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 66.7 | 66.6 -0% | 91.8 -38% | 65 3% | 137.4 -106% | 146 -119% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.8 | 54.5 | 115.9 | 110.2 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
电池容量较小,只有 45 瓦时,尽管采用了 16 英寸的大尺寸电池,这对于像 ThinkBook 16 G7 这样的经济型机型来说是正常的。价格较高的 华硕 VivoBook Pro 16的电池容量要大 2 倍以上。不过,由于采用了高效的 Meteor Lake-U CPU,ThinkBook 的实际浏览时间达到了近 9 小时。升级到 H 系列配置的用户应预计电池续航时间会缩短几个小时。
从空电到满电的充电速度相对较快,只需不到 70 分钟。
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G6 ABP R5 7530U, Vega 7, 45 Wh | MSI Summit A16 AI Plus A3HMTG Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 82 Wh | HP Envy x360 2-in-1 16-ad0097nr R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 68 Wh | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 96 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 15% | 4% | 5% | 51% | 15% | |
Reader / Idle | 1150 | 935 -19% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 528 | 605 15% | 547 4% | 459 -13% | 799 51% | 606 15% |
Load | 79 | 116 47% | ||||
H.264 | 696 | 585 |
笔记本检查评级
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML
- 12/20/2024 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.