联想 ThinkPad T16 G2 AMD 笔记本电脑评测:搭载 Ryzen 7040 的大型 ThinkPad 更加出色
2022 年 联想 ThinkPad T16 第一代作为第一款将 AMD CPU 与超过 14 英寸的屏幕结合在一起的 T 系列 ThinkPad 进入市场--在此之前,面向企业客户的大 T 系列只能采用英特尔芯片。在 2024 年,联想似乎想 "回归本源",因为 新款联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3将只采用英特尔酷睿 Ultra。我们有足够的理由看看搭载 AMD Ryzen 7040U 的联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2,因为我们不知道 Ryzen 何时会再次登陆大型办公机器的主板。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.9 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.8 kg | 23.8 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
90 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.8 kg | 20.5 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
90.2 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE R5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M | 1.8 kg | 20.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M | 1.9 kg | 19.2 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.6 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 17.1 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
底盘:橡胶塑料,镁合金内核
即将上市的联想 ThinkPad T16 G3 采用了全新的机身设计,而联想 ThinkPad T16 G2 则保留了既有的机身设计。与 2024 机型不同的是,机身外部依然是深灰色,而不是新版本的纯黑色。屏幕边框仍然稍宽,不过这也意味着该机屏幕上没有出现备受争议的网络摄像头凸起,这也是新款 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑的特点。
联想笔记本采用了经典的 ThinkPad 结构和材料:虽然外壳由塑料制成,但底座内部采用了镁合金核心。这样既控制了重量,又提供了高度的稳定性和坚固性,同时还不会过多增加成本。屏幕和底座都可以稍稍用力扭转,键盘边框没有松动,强力按压显示屏背面也不会使画面变形。有一点小麻烦:虽然与其他 ThinkPad 相比,它的材料比较容易脏。
与更小巧的 T ThinkPad 相比,下拉式铰链的金属盖更宽。它们允许 180 度的打开角度,这也是 ThinkPad 的一贯风格,不过不能单手打开。反过来,屏幕也不会晃动。
关于 惠普 EliteBook 865 G10与惠普 EliteBook 865 G10 相比,最接近的竞争对手联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 AMD 更轻巧,但更大更厚。
连接性ThinkPad T16 AMD 现配备 USB4
与 联想 ThinkPad T16 G1 AMD相比,端口选择没有变化,但有一个例外:两个 USB C 端口中的一个现在支持 USB4。这仍然让拥有双 Thunderbolt 4 端口的英特尔 T16 G2 占据优势,但无论如何,这都是一个不错的改进。
ThinkPad T 系列的一个特殊功能是 RJ45 以太网,这是 HP EliteBook 865 G10所缺乏的。
交流
联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 AMD 采用的是高通公司的 WiFi 6E 解决方案,其运行完美无瑕。上传速率低于下载速率,但下载速度极快。
除了必备的蓝牙 5.3,我们的评测设备还包含一个 4G LTE 模块(Quectel EM05-G)。这是一个 Cat 4 模块,是一种慢速 LTE 变种。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Average Qualcomm WCN685x (521 - 1838, n=21) | |
Average of class Office (47.8 - 1793, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average Qualcomm WCN685x (852 - 1777, n=21) | |
Average of class Office (104.2 - 1775, n=89, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average Qualcomm WCN685x (623 - 1961, n=22) | |
Average of class Office (713 - 1961, n=48, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average Qualcomm WCN685x (886 - 1790, n=22) | |
Average of class Office (1065 - 1790, n=48, last 2 years) |
网络摄像头
联想配备了一个 500 万像素的网络摄像头。在光线充足的情况下,摄像头的质量足以满足视频会议的需要。在光线不足的条件下,尽管摄像头的分辨率不错,但其质量却相当糟糕。
安全
与通常的商务设备一样,联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 具有许多消费类笔记本电脑所不具备的安全功能。其中包括专用的 TPM 芯片、智能卡读卡器和 Kensington 锁插槽。此外,联想笔记本电脑还配备了机械相机快门,以提高私密性。
红外摄像头和指纹识别器在消费类笔记本电脑上更为常见,可用于快速生物识别登录。ThinkPad 拥有这两项功能,指纹识别器位于电源按钮中。
配件
除了 65 瓦充电器外,包装盒内没有其他配件。
维护
松开背面和侧面的八颗固定螺丝和几个卡扣后,联想 ThinkPad T16 G2 露出了它的内部。值得注意的是风扇的一侧有很多空位,联想只是在更大的机箱中使用了与较小的 ThinkPad T14 G4 相同的部件。内存完全焊接在机身上,与新款联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 3 形成鲜明对比。WiFi 解决方案也是如此,而 WWAN 模块和 M.2 2280 固态硬盘则是模块化的。内置电池也可以升级,因为还有更大的 86 Wh 版本。
ThinkPad T 系列的一个特殊功能是用户可更换键盘。这项功能曾是大多数笔记本电脑的标准配置,但最近已变得越来越少。
保修
该机型保修三年。如果出现缺陷,必须将设备送回。保修不仅限于原产国德国,也适用于全球。如需额外收费,保修期可延长至五年,并可增加额外选项,如延长电池保修期和现场服务。
输入设备ThinkPad 的典型品质
键盘
联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 的键盘符合最新的 ThinkPad 标准。在键盘上打字非常舒适,因为键盘在柔软和清晰的键入感之间取得了很好的平衡。 1.5 毫米的键程对于 ThinkPad 来说不算大,但比许多其他现代笔记本电脑都要大。符合人体工程学的 U 键形状和微凹键帽是它的另一个优点。这款键盘在输入长文本时非常舒适。
在布局方面,应该指出的是,联想与大多数 16 英寸笔记本电脑一样,配备了专用的数字键盘。数字键盘位于键盘字母部分的右侧,而字母部分又略微偏左。键盘布局的其他部分也没什么可抱怨的。分组 F 键是 ThinkPad 的一个明显优势,专用导航键(主页、结束、上一页/下一页)也是如此。对德国 ISO 布局有一点小小的不满:回车键左侧的按键略显拥挤。我们宁愿看到联想缩小数字键盘,而不是键盘的主要部分。
触摸板和 TrackPoint
联想 ThinkPad T16 G2 的触摸板长 11.5 厘米,宽 6.7 厘米。这是一块机械式触摸板,只能按压表面的底部。机械结构不会晃动,点击感觉良好,压点清晰。与联想 ThinkPad T 笔记本电脑一样,触控板表面由塑料制成,光滑且具有良好的滑动特性。它的质量不如玻璃触控板。总的来说,尽管有更好的输入设备,但触控板还是非常实用,并能很好地完成任务。
键盘中间的红色 TrackPoint 是触摸板的替代品。带有红色橡胶盖的指点杆可用于控制鼠标指针的方向,用户只需对橡胶盖施加压力即可。触摸板上方的三个专用鼠标键是为 TrackPoint 而设,中间的按键用于滚动。触控板用户需要适应这个按键,但它在执行拖放操作、火车或飞机等近距离操作或戴手套使用时具有优势。在 ThinkPad T16 G2 中,它的功能没有任何问题。在 Windows 设置中,有一项针对 TrackPoint 的特殊设置。
显示屏:磨砂、可用屏幕
联想在 T16 G2 中销售五种不同的 16:10 16 英寸屏幕:
- WUXGA(1,920 x 1,200),IPS,300 cd/m²,45 % NTSC,哑光
- WUXGA(1,920 x 1,200),IPS,300 cd/m²,45 % NTSC,无光泽,On-Cell 触摸屏
- WUXGA(1,920 x 1,200),IPS,400 cd/m²,100 % sRGB,亚光,低功耗
- WUXGA(1,920 x 1,200),IPS,500 cd/m²,100 % sRGB,哑光,隐私保护
- WQUXGA(3,840 x 2,400),OLED,400 cd/m²,100 % DCI-P3,半光泽/半亚光,HDR
这里使用的屏幕可能是个人买家的最佳选择,除非需要更高质量的 OLED 面板。446 cd/m² 的屏幕亮度很有竞争力,只有HP EliteBook 865 G10 的屏幕亮度更高,不过 Sureview 面板也有其他缺点。
ThinkPad 笔记本电脑的友达面板显示速度相对较慢,不适合显示快速运动。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 446 cd/m²
Contrast: 1593:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.6
ΔE Greyscale 6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
77.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
75.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE B160UAN01.K, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Lenovo MNG007JA1-2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE MNG007DA1-C, IPS-LED, 2560x1600, 16" | HP EliteBook 865 G10 InfoVision IVO3E94 (X160NV42 R0), IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1 , IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -8% | -8% | -2% | -5% | 21% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 75.9 | 67 -12% | 66.7 -12% | 72.8 -4% | 70 -8% | 99.9 32% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.2 | 96.9 -1% | 95.7 -3% | 99.9 2% | 99.3 1% | 100 2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 77.2 | 69.3 -10% | 69.1 -10% | 75 -3% | 71.2 -8% | 100 30% |
Response Times | 24% | 26% | -11% | 72% | 98% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40.8 ? | 32 ? 22% | 32.1 ? 21% | 48 ? -18% | 11 ? 73% | 0.57 ? 99% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26.9 ? | 20 ? 26% | 18.9 ? 30% | 27.6 ? -3% | 8 ? 70% | 1 ? 96% |
PWM Frequency | 550 | 238.8 | ||||
Screen | 23% | 20% | 10% | 20% | 18% | |
Brightness middle | 446 | 446 0% | 417 -7% | 865 94% | 356 -20% | 379.8 -15% |
Brightness | 425 | 414 -3% | 388 -9% | 724 70% | 349 -18% | 383 -10% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 86 -5% | 81 -11% | 47 -48% | 93 2% | 98 8% |
Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.32 -14% | 0.24 14% | 0.34 -21% | 0.28 -0% | |
Contrast | 1593 | 1394 -12% | 1738 9% | 2544 60% | 1271 -20% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 1.5 59% | 1.7 54% | 4.86 -31% | 1.7 54% | 4.7 -27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.8 | 2.2 75% | 3.5 60% | 11.58 -32% | 3 66% | 7.51 15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.6 | 1 37% | 1.4 12% | 1.05 34% | 1 37% | 0.55 66% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6 | 1.6 73% | 2.4 60% | 8 -33% | 1.3 78% | 0.8 87% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.16 102% | 2.66 83% | 2.1 105% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6499 100% | 6482 100% | 6924 94% | 6636 98% | 6625 98% | 6381 102% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 13% /
17% | 13% /
15% | -1% /
5% | 29% /
22% | 46% /
32% |
* ... smaller is better
出厂时,色彩偏向光谱的绿色部分。通过使用 X-Rite i1 Pro 2 和 X-Rite i1Profiler 进行校准,可以轻松纠正这一问题。Colorchecker deltaE 描述了与理想值的平均偏差,校准后为 1.6。我们创建的配置文件可以一如既往地在上面的灰色框中下载。
对于联想宣传的 100% sRGB 面板来说,色域符合预期。对于简单的照片编辑,这块屏幕当然是可用的。
在室外,联想ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 AMD表现出色,这要归功于磨砂表面和相对较高的屏幕亮度。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.7 ms rise | |
↘ 12.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.1 ms rise | |
↘ 21.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能:AMD 带来稳定性
联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 配备了两颗 CPU:AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7540U 和 AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7540U。 AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7540U和 AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 7840U.没有专用 GPU。图形处理器选项为 AMD Radeon 760M或 Radeon 780M取决于所选的处理器。
M.2 2280 固态硬盘(出厂容量可达 2 TB)可以升级,而内存则是焊接的。联想在主板上安装了最多 64 GB LPDDR5X-6400。
测试条件
联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 有三种性能模式:
- 最佳电池续航时间:PL1 13 W / PL2 13 W
- 平衡:PL1 27 瓦 / PL2 30 瓦
- 最佳性能:PL1 32 瓦 / PL2 37 瓦
可通过 Windows 设置选择配置文件。它们会影响功率限制 (PL),从而设定处理器的功耗。PL1 是指持续负载下的功耗,而 PL2 则是指短期提升性能。
处理器
......(英文 AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 7840U是 "凤凰 "一代处理器,拥有 8 个 Zen4 内核和 16 个线程。该处理器的最高时钟频率为 5.1 GHz,基本时钟频率为 3.3 GHz。作为 U 处理器,该芯片适用于至少能为处理器提供 15 至 30 W 功耗的笔记本电脑。 CPU 比较列表进行比较。
在联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 中,AMD Ryzen 可以很好地发挥其潜力。该芯片的运行速度比使用该处理器的所有测试笔记本电脑的平均运行速度快大约 6%。惠普 HP EliteBook 865 G10甚至更快,但它使用的是瓦数更高的 Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS.与 英特尔型号的 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2AMD 变体大约快 18%,在持续负载情况下,差异会越来越大。
使用电池供电时,我们没有发现任何性能限制。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE -2! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (11739 - 15074, n=10) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=92, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (1373 - 1742, n=10) | |
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (4469 - 5917, n=10) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=92, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (533 - 678, n=10) | |
Average of class Office (229 - 764, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (1025 - 2439, n=12) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (217 - 272, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=92, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (208 - 270, n=10) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (50087 - 62156, n=10) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=93, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (4657 - 6408, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (7310 - 11489, n=10) | |
Average of class Office (662 - 14767, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (1982 - 2562, n=10) | |
Average of class Office (457 - 2769, n=57, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (7399 - 10558, n=10) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (1355 - 1933, n=10) | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1989, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (14.4 - 18.6, n=10) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (43.4 - 67.1, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (0.4559 - 0.581, n=11) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (17924 - 25901, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (78360 - 109745, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (3519 - 4847, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (83206 - 114294, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=92, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (11969 - 14822, n=10) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (40720 - 58482, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (53018 - 166333, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average of class Office (7860 - 155900, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (801 - 1047, n=10) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (9347 - 13846, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (26622 - 38173, n=10) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
系统性能
在 PCMark10 的测试中,联想 ThinkPad T16 G2 击败了英特尔机型,而在 Crossmark 的测试中则基本打成平手。在日常性能方面,没有什么负面因素需要指出。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (5866 - 7157, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=86, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (9068 - 11081, n=10) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (7323 - 10099, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=86, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (7204 - 8987, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average of class Office (2126 - 9773, n=86, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1256 - 1804, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=86, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1261 - 1798, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=86, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1251 - 1835, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=86, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (1082 - 1775, n=10) | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (188.4 - 322, n=11) | |
Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (179.4 - 256, n=9) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Office (404 - 1966, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M (509 - 746, n=11) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6421 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (43255 - 70532, n=11) | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (37399 - 61602, n=10) | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 112436, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (49426 - 92289, n=12) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (90 - 137.2, n=11) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Average of class Office (8.3 - 185.2, n=93, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
这里的 DPC 延迟问题并不像比较中的英特尔笔记本电脑那么严重。在 Youtube 测试中,跳过了 14 帧,这并不是什么大问题。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
* ... smaller is better
存储
SK Hynix 为联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 生产了固态硬盘。M.2 2280 闪存的容量为 1 TB,通过快速 NVMe PCIe 4.0 标准连接。虽然还不够完美,但速度已经很不错了。相比之下,固态硬盘的速度有快有慢。
* ... smaller is better
Sustained performance read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
迚ケ谿オ譎る俣 AMD Radeon 780M是用于所有 Ryzen 7 和 Ryzen 9 APU(凤凰一代)的图形解决方案。iGPU 的性能比 英特尔 Xe 图形处理器的 T16 G2 英特尔iGPU 的性能比 T16 G2 英特尔的 Intels Xe Graphics 快得多,可用于要求更高的任务--即使性能与专用 GPU 相比仍然逊色。这款设备还可以玩休闲游戏,但这肯定不是商务笔记本电脑的核心使用模式。
3DMark 11 Performance | 12236 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 32949 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7078 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2930 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Average of class Office (3.8 - 34, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE | |
Average of class Office (3.35 - 47.8, n=78, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 136 | 125.2 | 56.6 | 24.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 129.5 | 83.2 | 42 | 24.9 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 115.1 | 92.7 | 76.2 | 65.8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 70.4 | 33.6 | 24.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 43.2 | 32.1 | 26.6 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 140.2 | 59.7 | 51 | 43.7 |
F1 23 (2023) | 74.1 | 65.9 | 46.1 | 9.98 |
排放:风扇噪音低
噪音
联想将 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 AMD 的风扇活动设置得相当低。在平均负载下(性能配置文件:平衡),主动冷却系统几乎听不到声音。只有在压力测试(性能配置文件:最佳性能)中推动设备时,ThinkPad 笔记本电脑的风扇才会变得明显,不过即使在这种情况下,它也比竞争对手安静,只有 35 至 37 dB(a)。尤其是惠普 EliteBook 865 G10 的风扇更强劲,声音更大。
联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 没有线圈啸叫的问题。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.5 / 24.5 / 24.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 26.6 / 35.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.5 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE Radeon 660M, R5 PRO 6650U, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK | HP EliteBook 865 G10 Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -3% | 3% | -0% | -14% | -12% | |
off / environment * | 24.5 | 24 2% | 23.1 6% | 23 6% | 25.5 -4% | 23.4 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.5 | 24 2% | 23.1 6% | 23 6% | 25.5 -4% | 24.1 2% |
Idle Average * | 24.5 | 24 2% | 23.1 6% | 23 6% | 28.7 -17% | 24.3 1% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.5 | 26.8 -9% | 23.1 6% | 23 6% | 29.1 -19% | 28 -14% |
Load Average * | 26.6 | 26.8 -1% | 25.4 5% | 29.17 -10% | 33.8 -27% | 41 -54% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.2 | 38.9 -5% | 35.93 3% | 38.91 -5% | 37.6 -1% | 40.9 -10% |
Load Maximum * | 35.5 | 38.6 -9% | 39.1 -10% | 39.46 -11% | 44.9 -26% | 40.9 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
热量
在最大负荷时,底部表面温度最高可达 52 摄氏度或 126 华氏度。当然,这种情况并不常见。这一热点也仅限于设备的背面,正面包括掌托区域都保持相当低的温度。
在 Prime95 和 Furmark 的 stresstest 测试中,没有出现节流现象。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.7 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-2.3 °C / -4.1 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, AMD Radeon 660M | HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M | SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 6% | 18% | -8% | 6% | -2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 48.7 | 40.5 17% | 34.6 29% | 45 8% | 41.1 16% | 41.6 15% |
Maximum Bottom * | 52 | 42.7 18% | 41.5 20% | 50 4% | 42 19% | 46.6 10% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.4 | 28.2 -7% | 22.6 14% | 30 -14% | 28.5 -8% | 30.4 -15% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.3 | 28 -6% | 24.5 7% | 34 -29% | 26.8 -2% | 31 -18% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 的上扬声器是典型的办公笔记本电脑扬声器:对于办公室的日常通话,它们已经足够。但在播放音乐时,它们缺乏底音和音量。惠普 EliteBook 865 G10 在这方面也好不了多少。外置解决方案是最佳选择。
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 865 G10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.09 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理:电池寿命长的 ThinkPad T16 G2
耗电量
尽管屏幕分辨率较低,但功耗却高于前者。 联想 ThinkPad T16 第 1 代 AMD.在这方面,英特尔变体笔记本电脑的效率也更高。
这款商务笔记本的最大功耗为 58 W,完全符合 65 W USB C 充电器的容量要求。
Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.9 Watt |
Idle | 3.7 / 7.2 / 8.7 Watt |
Load |
44.1 / 58.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE R5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK, IPS-LED, 2560x1600, 16" | HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Average AMD Radeon 780M | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 15% | 3% | -56% | -51% | -36% | -33% | -7% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.7 | 3.1 16% | 3.2 14% | 5.2 -41% | 6.3 -70% | 7.1 -92% | 6.2 ? -68% | 4.54 ? -23% |
Idle Average * | 7.2 | 6.4 11% | 8.1 -13% | 12.8 -78% | 14.4 -100% | 10.1 -40% | 8.44 ? -17% | 7.49 ? -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.7 | 6.8 22% | 8.6 1% | 14.1 -62% | 16.2 -86% | 18.6 -114% | 10.8 ? -24% | 9.14 ? -5% |
Load Average * | 44.1 | 29.3 34% | 45.4 -3% | 65 -47% | 46.2 -5% | 45.3 -3% | 56.3 ? -28% | 42.8 ? 3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.9 | 41.5 18% | 40 21% | 68.2 -34% | 49.4 3% | 39.5 22% | ||
Load Maximum * | 58.2 | 64.6 -11% | 59.6 -2% | 101.44 -74% | 85.2 -46% | 52.9 9% | 75.3 ? -29% | 61.3 ? -5% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption w/external monitor
电池寿命
interaö 52.5 Wh 电池容量保持不变。还可选配 86 Wh 大容量电池。使用小电池时,ThinkPad 笔记本电脑已经取得了不错的成绩。在 WiFi 测试(150 cd/m²)中,它能持续近 11 个小时。
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 52.5 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21HH003AGE i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52.5 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21CH004MGE R5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M, 52.5 Wh | HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, 76 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 90% | 6% | 47% | 75% | -49% | 51% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 658 | 690 5% | 635 -3% | 924 40% | 479 -27% | 336 -49% | 600 ? -9% |
Load | 56 | 154 175% | 64 14% | 86 54% | 155 177% | 118.1 ? 111% |
Pros
Cons
结论联想 ThinkPad T16 第 2 代 AMD 几乎是一款完美的工作笔记本电脑
即使采用英特尔 CPU,联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 也是商务笔记本电脑领域的有力竞争者。采用 AMD 内核的 ThinkPad 笔记本电脑则更加出色,因为 Ryzen 处理器速度更快,即使在持续负载的情况下也能保持性能。同时,ThinkPad T16 G2 AMD 非常安静,散热也相当出色,结合哑光、明亮的 16 英寸低功耗屏幕,电池续航时间也不错。此外,与 ThinkPad T16 G2 Intel 不同,该机型的内存始终以双通道模式运行,避免了性能损失。该系统的其他优势,如包括 numblock 在内的出色输入设备、坚固的机箱和丰富的可用端口,与英特尔版本完全相同。
当然,英特尔 T16 的大多数缺点也同样存在。其中之一就是升级能力有限:WiFi 卡是焊接的,只有一个固态硬盘插槽。更糟糕的是:与英特尔 T16 G2 不同,AMD 配置的内存是完全焊接的。出厂时,联想装入了 32 GB 内存,但由于这一因素,长期使用的可行性仍然有限。缺少 SD 读卡器是另一个弱点。此外,联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 只有一个 USB4 端口,而不是像英特尔机型那样有两个 Thunderbolt 端口,而且该机型使用的 WWAN 卡仅支持 LTE CAT4,是一种缓慢而过时的解决方案。
耐用、快速、持久:通过联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 AMD,联想为典型的办公人员打造了一款出色的笔记本电脑,尽管升级能力有所欠缺。
ThinkPad 最大的竞争对手是惠普 EliteBook 865 G10 - 虽然不是我们测试的那款,但采用了 U 处理器和低功耗屏幕。惠普笔记本的优势在于可升级内存。除此之外,这两款商务笔记本都非常相似,而联想 ThinkPad T16 G2 AMD 拥有 RJ45 以太网端口。联想 ThinkPad 和惠普 EliteBook 都是需要为办公人员提供生产力机器的企业客户的最佳选择。
定价和可用性
联想 ThinkPad T16 Gen 2 在美国的起价约为 950 美元。亚马逊报价约为 870 美元。
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE
- 05/27/2024 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.