联想ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9评测--配备120Hz OLED且无TrackPoint按键的高端商务可折叠电脑
多年来,ThinkPad X1 Yoga 一直是联想 ThinkPad 系列中的旗舰敞篷机型,但很显然,Yoga 这个名字现在已被完全移至私人客户领域,第九代敞篷机型现在被简单地称为 ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9。这款新机型的外壳经过了彻底改造,现在还使用了英特尔最新的流星湖移动处理器--不过仅限于性能较弱的 U 系列机型。
我们的测试样品名为 ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE,配备酷睿至尊 7 165H(包括 iGPU)、32 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘以及分辨率为 2,880 x 1,800 像素、刷新率为 120 Hz 的新型 OLED 触摸屏。该机型目前售价 3948 美元。配备 64 GB 内存和 2 TB 固态硬盘的顶级机型售价为 4 708 美元,笔记本电脑的入门价格为 3 456 美元起(酷睿 Ultra 5、16 GB 内存、512 GB 固态硬盘、全高清 IPS 显示屏)。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.4 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.3 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.53 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.3 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.6 kg | 16.28 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
91.4 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.5 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90.5 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 现在没有放置触控笔的空间
尽管联想为新款 X1 2in1 G9 换上了全新的外壳,但其总体设计语言却保持不变。这意味着这款灰色的可折叠机型继续与黑色的 ThinkPad 机型区分开来,同时其表面也不易留下指纹痕迹。不过,最大的变化可能与输入笔有关,它现在比以前大得多了。反过来,现在也无法将笔存放在笔记本电脑的外壳内。取而代之的是,你只能通过磁力将它吸附在设备的两侧。这并不能完全代替原来的设计,因为笔很容易从外壳上脱落,尤其是当你把笔记本放在包里运输时。
对于 X1 convertible 的质量,我们没有任何负面评价,因为它的铝制外壳(底座底部为镁铝合金)非常稳固,我们无法看到凹痕,也无法听到任何吱吱嘎嘎的声音。盖子也是如此,我们尤其喜欢它的铰链,因为它能牢牢固定屏幕,几乎完全避免了调整角度时屏幕的晃动。
当然,你也可以将显示屏完全翻转过来,这样就可以实现 X1 2in1 的各种操作模式。不过,在帐篷或演示模式下使用时,摄像头驼峰(现在几乎所有联想笔记本电脑都采用这种设计)会显得特别明显。这是因为在这种情况下,设备实际上是坐在摄像头驼峰上的,看起来很奇特。值得庆幸的是,这样做没有任何功能限制。
在对比设备中,ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 的占地面积最大,但差异很小。反过来,它也是最薄的机型,厚度仅为 15.5 毫米。它的重量为 1.35 千克,随附的 65 瓦电源又增加了 329 克。
连接性 - 配备 Thunderbolt 和 HDMI 的 X1 2in1
ThinkPad X1 2in1 在连接选项方面没有任何缺陷--除了现代的 Thunderbolt 4 端口外,它还配备了普通的 USB-A 端口以及功能齐全的 HDMI 输出。另一方面,联想没有安装 SD 读卡器。左侧的两个 USB-C 接口都向前移动了一些,这可能会增加访问背面 USB-A 接口的难度。除此之外,没有布局方面的问题。
交流
新的 X1 2in1 已经可以配置现代的 Wi-Fi 7 模块,但我们的测试配置只采用了英特尔著名的 AX211 卡,它支持 Wi-Fi 6E(6 GHz)和蓝牙 5.3。在我们使用华硕参考路由器进行的测试中,其传输速率很高而且很稳定--此外,我们在测试期间没有发现任何连接问题。
我们的测试设备支持 WWAN,并且已经安装了蜂窝模块所需的天线和 nano SIM 卡插槽。此外,新款 X1 2in1 是多年来首批可以通过制造商的配置器订购支持 WWAN 的设备之一--通常只有特定的 Campus 型号才支持。
Networking | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
网络摄像头
您可以选择为联想笔记本电脑配备带机械盖的 800 万像素摄像头,我们的机型也配备了该摄像头。与普通的 1080p 机型相比,更高的分辨率尤其有利于图像的清晰度。加上流星湖处理器,该设备的操作系统支持工作室特效(柔焦、头部跟踪等)。此外,还配备了红外摄像头,可通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。
维护
机箱底盖通过普通的飞利浦螺钉固定,拆卸非常方便。在内部,你可以清洁风扇,如果需要,还可以更换电池或 M.2 2280 SSD。还可以安装 WWAN 模块,而内存和 WLAN 模块是焊接上去的。
输入设备 - 无 TrackPoint 按钮的触觉触摸板
ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 的键盘键程仍为 1.5 毫米,打字时总体感觉舒适,不过其质量已无法与老款机型的键程相比--与 2018 年的 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 相比,我们总是会注意到这一点。此外,与竞争对手相比,ThinkPad 在这方面不再具有优势。它的键盘上新增了指纹扫描仪按钮,但你不得不放弃新的 Copilot 键。另外,两级键盘背光不能自动激活也很恼人。
在当前的 ThinkPad X1 2in1 上,联想让用户选择是要带有三个 TrackPoint 专用按钮的经典点击式触摸板,还是要没有任何专用按钮的触觉触摸板。我们的测试设备安装的是后者,只有中间的 TrackPoint 按钮能用光点感觉到。基本上,触控板没有活动部件,反馈是通过振动电机模拟的。这样做的好处是,各点的反馈都是一样的,在我们的测试中,其操作效果非常好。不过,那些主要使用 TrackPoint 的用户可能不应该选择触觉垫,因为触觉垫无法替代专用按键,而且操作起来也不是最好的。我们还可以使用随附的活动联想超薄笔进行输入,在实际操作中没有发现任何问题。
显示屏 - 光栅效果 OLED
我们的测试设备使用的是可选的 OLED 触摸屏,分辨率为 2,880 x 1,800 像素。该面板由三星制造,主观而言,其画质非常出色--尽管在显示浅色内容时可以看到轻微的光栅效应。它的亮度值约为 400 cd/m²,这表明三星目前采用的是 OLED 技术,不过,尽管采用了触摸屏,最新的Galaxy Book Pro 机型并没有出现这种光栅效应。色彩看起来超级鲜艳,屏幕的响应速度也非常快。此外,120 Hz 的较高刷新率也有助于描绘运动。亮度和色温都不能自动调节。
它的平均亮度为 411 cd/m²,加上较低的黑色值,使其具有极高的对比度。在 HDR 模式下,当显示小幅图像摘录时,其最大亮度为 630 cd/m²,而当显示几乎全白的屏幕时,我们注意到其亮度为 510 cd/m²。在亮度为 99% 及以下时,我们测得的闪烁频率为 240Hz PWM。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 412 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.9
ΔE Greyscale 1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE ATNA4ßYK20-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U BOE NE140WUM-N62, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -20% | -12% | -3% | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 69.3 -31% | 80.6 -19% | 99.8 0% | 99.8 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 98.6 -1% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.6 | 71.1 -27% | 80.1 -18% | 89.3 -9% | 97.3 0% |
Response Times | -5238% | -7365% | 22% | -25% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.61 ? | 43.1 ? -6966% | 59.6 ? -9670% | 0.77 ? -26% | 0.8 ? -31% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.69 ? | 24.9 ? -3509% | 35.6 ? -5059% | 0.75 ? -9% | 1 ? -45% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 480 100% | 240.5 ? 0% | ||
Screen | -92% | -19% | -3% | -56% | |
Brightness middle | 412 | 425.2 3% | 501.4 22% | 378 -8% | 371.6 -10% |
Brightness | 411 | 381 -7% | 491 19% | 384 -7% | 373 -9% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 87 -11% | 88 -10% | 97 -1% | 99 1% |
Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.32 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 3.29 -73% | 2.52 -33% | 1.4 26% | 4.91 -158% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.9 | 8.55 -119% | 4.87 -25% | 2.2 44% | 8.33 -114% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.9 | 0.57 70% | 0.45 76% | 1.59 16% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1 | 6.1 -510% | 2.8 -180% | 1.7 -70% | 2.2 -120% |
Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.17 101% | 2.17 101% | 2.25 98% |
CCT | 6361 102% | 6925 94% | 6270 104% | 6256 104% | 6120 106% |
Contrast | 1849 | 1567 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1783% /
-932% | -2465% /
-1241% | 5% /
3% | -27% /
-36% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件(X-Rite i1 Pro2)对面板进行了分析,其开箱即用的设置已经相当不错。我们注意到没有色差,色彩偏差也还可以。联想也没有提供 sRGB 色彩空间的配置文件。虽然覆盖了 P3,但该面板并不是编辑照片的理想选择。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.69 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.35 ms rise | |
↘ 0.34 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.61 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.31 ms rise | |
↘ 0.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
从外观上看,该设备当然得益于其极高的对比度,但屏幕的强反射表面在大多数情况下会导致反光。OLED 面板的视角稳定性非常好。
性能 - Meteor Lake 和最高 64GB 内存
联想只提供配备英特尔新一代流星湖 U 系列移动处理器的全新 ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9,您可以选择酷睿至尊 5 和酷睿至尊 7(以及相应的 vPro 版本)。Core Ultra 5 型号和 酷睿至尊 7 155U可配置 16 或 32 GB,Core Ultra 7 165U 可配置 16、32 或 64 GB。
测试条件
在 ThinkPad 机型上,联想没有提供额外的能源配置文件,而是自动链接到 Windows 设置中。以下测试和基准测试均使用最高性能 模式进行。
处理器 - Core Ultra 7 165H
酷睿至尊 7 165U 酷睿至尊 7 165U属于英特尔最新一代流星湖处理器,与之相比 酷睿至尊 7 155U相比,它的最高时钟频率略高,可达 4.9 GHz,并支持 vPro。U 系列芯片只提供两个快速性能内核,其多核性能与旧版的 酷睿 i7-1355U尽管其 TDP 较高,达到 40/30 瓦,但总的来说,其性能相当低。在电池模式下,该处理器的最大功耗为 35 瓦,因此在这种情况下,其多核性能降低了约 8%。更多 CPU 基准测试请参见我们的 技术部分。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U -3! | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE -2! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (616 - 18070, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (8498 - 10797, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (1507 - 1709, n=4) | |
Average of class Convertible (308 - 1970, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average of class Convertible (242 - 6954, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (3254 - 4176, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (604 - 661, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 755, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (1428 - 1667, n=4) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (220 - 252, n=4) | |
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Average of class Convertible (193 - 1059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (310 - 454, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (30898 - 43441, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (4644 - 4960, n=4) |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (3257 - 14267, n=39, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (9308 - 9944, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Convertible (1216 - 2696, n=39, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (2275 - 2359, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (8028 - 8719, n=4) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (1714 - 1740, n=4) | |
Average of class Convertible (319 - 2003, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (9.06 - 12.3, n=4) | |
Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 20.1, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (43.5 - 56.4, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (0.4881 - 0.555, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Convertible | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Convertible (468 - 25226, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (6218 - 9685, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Convertible (2644 - 106512, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (32054 - 47555, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (1739 - 2694, n=4) | |
Average of class Convertible (182 - 4764, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Convertible (10502 - 120368, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (45867 - 47345, n=4) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (659 - 14835, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (4547 - 5776, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Convertible (1420 - 56839, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (15677 - 23352, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (1279 - 169089, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (36912 - 50177, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (518 - 794, n=4) | |
Average of class Convertible (61.4 - 1088, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Convertible (254 - 13175, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (3182 - 4965, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (41747 - 49113, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Average of class Convertible (5136 - 53406, n=62, last 2 years) |
系统性能
在合成系统测试中,我们的测试设备表现并不突出,但即便如此,它在日常使用中仍是一款反应迅速的笔记本电脑,在测试过程中没有给我们带来任何问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (5893 - 6421, n=4) | |
Average of class Convertible (1486 - 7963, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (10937 - 11238, n=4) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average of class Convertible (3975 - 12059, n=59, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (7722 - 8751, n=4) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Convertible (2764 - 10800, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (811 - 12360, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (6229 - 7325, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1471 - 1539, n=3) | |
Average of class Convertible (310 - 1912, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1448 - 1479, n=3) | |
Average of class Convertible (389 - 1790, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1555 - 1685, n=3) | |
Average of class Convertible (252 - 2183, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (1305 - 1337, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average of class Convertible (295 - 1868, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (261 - 399, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Convertible (84.2 - 407, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (242 - 314, n=3) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average of class Convertible (49.4 - 314, n=59, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Convertible (407 - 2676, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (407 - 562, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 5893 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (69844 - 84739, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average of class Convertible (16353 - 108544, n=62, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Average of class Convertible (12706 - 125359, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (52264 - 59571, n=4) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (10177 - 117920, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (56033 - 64848, n=4) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 165U (137.8 - 146.4, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Average of class Convertible (7.4 - 173, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试(网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时没有显示出任何限制。虽然有一个驱动程序出现了偏差,但重要的 "中断到进程延迟 "值很低。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们测试设备中的 1-TB SSD(PCIe 4.0,M.2 2280)由 Kioxia(XG8)制造,首次启动设备后,用户有 887 GB 的可用空间。这是一款速度非常快的存储设备,传输速率超过 6 GB/s。它在连续负载下的性能几乎完全稳定。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
在 ThinkPad X1 2in1 中,图形计算由处理器的 iGPU 负责,新一代 Meteor Lake U 系列芯片不使用快速的 iGPU。 配备 8 个 Xe 内核的 Arc Graphics-的快速 Arc Graphics。 酷睿至尊 7 155H例如,与酷睿 Ultra 7 155H 搭配使用的是配备 8 个 Xe 内核的快速 Arc Graphics,而只使用了配备 4 Xe 内核的较慢型号.因此,其性能明显落后于配备 Core Ultra 7 155H 的设备,仅比旧版的 Iris Xe 图形处理器前几年的旧版 Iris Xe 图形处理器稍快一些。
当然,如果你打算下班后玩玩游戏,这也会影响设备的游戏性能。在这方面,新款 X1 2in1 也只是略微领先于旧款机型,你将只能玩一些较老或要求不高的游戏--在很多情况下,你仍然需要减少细节。至少,它的图形性能在长时间负载和电池模式下都保持稳定。更多 GPU 基准测试请访问移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 。
3DMark 11 Performance | 7589 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5118 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2285 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Average Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (592 - 904, n=14) | |
Average of class Convertible (326 - 2067, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Convertible (10 - 123.3, n=49, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Convertible (7.07 - 114.3, n=49, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Convertible (4.48 - 107.1, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Convertible (5.4 - 158.3, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 139.1 | 123.9 | 21.9 | 9 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 91 | 57 | 31 | 16.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 91.8 | 72.2 | 60.4 | 56.9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 48.1 | 26 | 18.2 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 40 | 29.7 | 24.8 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 48 | 25 | 23 | 21 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 115 | 50 | 40 | 32 |
F1 23 (2023) | 43.8 | 39.8 | 26 | 7.14 |
排放物 - 烦人的风扇
噪音排放
它的散热系统经过了改进,仍然由两个风扇组成,但新设计并不完全成功,因为新款 ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 在日常使用中噪音相当大,因为即使在执行简单任务时,风扇也会很快启动。这在实际使用中非常恼人,而且从其较低的整体性能来看也难以自圆其说。只要稍稍用力,笔记本电脑的噪音很快就会达到最大值,略低于 42 分贝(A),与上一代产品相当。至少在我们的测试设备上没有电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.5 / 28 / 29.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 41.7 / 41.7 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.5 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WDC PC SN810 512GB | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV2T04 | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 14% | 5% | 18% | 8% | |
off / environment * | 24.5 | 22.7 7% | 23.9 2% | 23.4 4% | 23.2 5% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.5 | 22.8 7% | 23.9 2% | 23.4 4% | 23.6 4% |
Idle Average * | 28 | 22.8 19% | 23.9 15% | 23.4 16% | 23.6 16% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.8 | 22.8 23% | 23.9 20% | 25.6 14% | 25 16% |
Load Average * | 41.7 | 29.4 29% | 36.4 13% | 25.6 39% | 34.8 17% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.7 | 35.5 15% | 44.7 -7% | 30.9 26% | 37.7 10% |
Load Maximum * | 41.7 | 42 -1% | 44.7 -7% | 32.6 22% | 46.2 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在测试过程中,我们测试设备的机箱在空闲模式和低负载情况下保持凉爽,但在高负载情况下,机箱表面会大面积发热,我们测得多处温度超过 40 °C。在日常使用中没有任何限制,使用也不受限制,但这也绝不是出色的性能。在综合 CPU/iGPU 负载的压力测试中,处理器的功耗曾一度高达 50 瓦,但随后迅速降至 40 瓦,然后又降至 22 瓦左右。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.3 °C / 84.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-1.2 °C / -2.1 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -16% | 2% | 3% | -16% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42.9 | 41.6 3% | 35.4 17% | 39.3 8% | 40 7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43.6 | 47.6 -9% | 37.8 13% | 45 -3% | 43 1% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.4 | 30.6 -25% | 27.2 -11% | 23.8 2% | 32 -31% |
Idle Bottom * | 24.9 | 33.2 -33% | 28.2 -13% | 24 4% | 35.2 -41% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
新款 ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 的扬声器不再位于键盘旁边,在我们的测量中,两个立体声模块(每个 2 瓦)的表现也稍显薄弱。不过,你不会听出区别,而且在实际使用中,它们的声音也很饱满响亮,但戴尔和惠普的竞争对手也表明,它们可以做得更好。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - OLED 和 120 Hz 成本运行时间
耗电量
我们对测试设备的耗电量进行了测量,没有发现任何意外情况,不过其闲置耗电量当然会因 OLED 面板上显示的背景而异。因此,您应该使用深色 Windows 设计和尽可能深色的壁纸,以尽可能降低耗电量。在使用联想默认壁纸的情况下,我们测得空闲模式下的最大功耗略高于 10 瓦,考虑到屏幕的高分辨率,这个值还是比较合理的。在负载模式下,最大功耗曾一度达到 64 瓦,一分钟后稳定在 42 瓦左右。因此,随机附带的 65 瓦电源足以满足需要。
Off / Standby | 0.25 / 0.67 Watt |
Idle | 7.3 / 10.1 / 10.4 Watt |
Load |
45.7 / 64.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN810 512GB, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, , IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV2T04, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Average Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 12% | 10% | 27% | -4% | 24% | 7% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.3 | 2.9 60% | 3.2 56% | 3.2 56% | 4.2 42% | 3.61 ? 51% | 5.21 ? 29% |
Idle Average * | 10.1 | 5.4 47% | 6.4 37% | 4.2 58% | 7.1 30% | 6.44 ? 36% | 8.16 ? 19% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.4 | 9.6 8% | 10.8 -4% | 4.9 53% | 12.9 -24% | 8.24 ? 21% | 11.1 ? -7% |
Load Average * | 45.7 | 55.9 -22% | 54.6 -19% | 40.5 11% | 58.9 -29% | 41 ? 10% | 46.2 ? -1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.2 | 42.6 -21% | 35.5 -1% | 37.9 -8% | 49.5 -41% | ||
Load Maximum * | 64.1 | 65.3 -2% | 70.2 -10% | 68.6 -7% | 66.7 -4% | 63.6 ? 1% | 67 ? -5% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
这款笔记本的电池容量为 57 Wh,没有任何变化,在高分辨率 OLED 面板下的整体运行时间也很一般。在 150 cd/m²(相当于测试设备最大 SDR 亮度的 68%)的 WLAN 测试中,X1 2in1 在 60 Hz 下的运行时间为 8.5 小时,在 120 Hz 下的运行时间略低于 7 小时。在全 SDR 亮度下,我们发现 60 Hz 时仅为 6:17 小时,120 Hz 时为 5:46 小时。竞争对手在这方面取得了更好的成绩,部分原因是他们的电池容量更大。在 150 cd/m² 下的视频测试中,我们测得的时间为 9 小时,而在满负荷情况下,电池可在 1.5 小时后耗尽。在设备开启的情况下,充满电需要 115 分钟,约 64 分钟后可恢复 80% 的电量。
如果您希望获得最长的电池续航时间,您一定要为 X1 2in1 配置一个 IPS 面板(1920 x 1200 像素、400 尼特、sRGB)。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G8 i7-1355U i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, 60 Wh | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 68 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -21% | 61% | 46% | 11% | 30% | |
H.264 | 540 | 999 85% | 773 ? 43% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 509 | 403 -21% | 815 60% | 555 9% | 600 18% | 594 ? 17% |
Load | 89 | 143 61% | 129 45% | 93 4% | 114.9 ? 29% |
Pros
Cons
判决--新表壳设计有利有弊
除了新名字之外,联想在新款 ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 上还做了很多改变,包括采用了全新的外壳。但问题是,用户几乎无法从中受益,在某些方面,该设备甚至比上一代产品更弱。对于外壳的质量,我们总体上没有什么负面评价,它非常稳定--此外,现在的铰链也比以前更好了。另一方面,联想取消了小型手写笔的插槽,现在提供的是一支更大的笔,也许可以通过磁力与外壳连接,但这并不能为笔记本电脑的外出携带提供一个非常坚固的解决方案。
该设备的新触觉触摸板效果不错,但如果你主要使用 TrackPoint,使用起来就不是很有趣了,因为我们只是缺少了旧版 TrackPoint 按键的反馈。不过,旧版本至少还可以进行配置。它的电源按钮被移到了侧面,这就是为什么现在指纹扫描仪牺牲了一个按钮的原因。键盘本身不错,至少以目前联想的标准来看是这样。不过,与竞争对手相比,它在质量上已不再具有优势。
联想为 ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 配备了新的外壳,但对消费者来说,这带来的问题多于优势。它可能拥有高达 64 GB 的内存,而且敞篷版还支持 WWAN,但你不得不忍受没有集成手写笔的烦恼,而且 Meteor Lake U 处理器的性能仍与前代产品处于同一水平。
虽然新的 Meteor Lake 处理器可以轻松提供足够的性能满足日常办公需求,但你还是不禁要问,为什么制造商一开始就选择了 U 系列处理器?目前的机型只有两个性能核心,几乎没有竞争力,而且 U 系列芯片只配备了速度较慢的 iGPU,拥有 4 个 Xe 核心,与旧款 Xe Graphics G7 相比只能提供很少的额外性能。考虑到其功耗限制,联想应该直接选择同样配备更快 iGPU 的 H 系列芯片。此外,笔记本的风扇在日常使用中也很烦人,因为它们经常会突然启动,而且声音很大。可选的 OLED 触摸屏除了有轻微的光栅效应外,画质还不错,但标配的 IPS 面板则需要更新。
这一切听起来都非常负面,但当你在谈论如此昂贵的设备时,你必须解决这些问题。即便如此,ThinkPad 在许多其他方面的出色表现还是给人留下了深刻印象,而且还取得了一些积极进展,例如配备了 8 百万像素摄像头,X1 2in1 是多年来首批支持 WWAN 的 ThinkPad 机型之一(除 Campus 限量版外)。此外,你还可以选择最大 64GB 内存,其附加费用也很公道。总而言之,这款笔记本电脑的性价比仍然很低,虽然获得了 "非常好 "的评分,但其整体性能却越来越差,而且发展方向也不对。
价格和供应情况
新款 ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 可通过联想网站直接配置和订购。价格从 3,456 美元起。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2in1 G9 21KE004AGE
- 06/03/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.