联想ThinkPad X1 Nano第二代回顾。史上最小的X1笔记本电脑
对ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 1的最大抱怨之一是其缓慢的处理器。当大多数其他子笔记本运行在成熟的28W酷睿i5-1135G7或i7-1165G7第11代CPU时,Nano Gen 1却坚持使用15Wi7-1160G7 。该机型可能是超轻量级的,但它给人的感觉是低重量直接影响了性能水平。新的ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2通过将i7-1160G7换成适当的12代28W i7-1280P vPro选项来解决这个问题,这应该使X1 Nano Gen 2成为最快的13.0英寸商务笔记本电脑之一,至少在纸面上是如此。
除了CPU的升级,第2代机型还带来了其他一些变化,包括更高分辨率的网络摄像头,更快的Wi-Fi和5G广域网支持。外观设计在其他方面与2021年的第1代机型相同,因此我们建议查看我们的现有的评论 ,以了解更多关于该笔记本电脑的物理特性。
这一领域的竞争者包括其他超轻量级的13英寸商务笔记本电脑,如HP Elite Dragonfly G3 ,戴尔Latitude 13 7330 ,LG Gram系列,或Dynabook Portege X30L 。
更多联想评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.9 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 958 g | 14.4 mm | 13.00" | 2160x1350 | |
89.8 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 946 g | 16 mm | 13.00" | 2160x1350 | |
91 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | HP Elite Dragonfly G3 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 16.3 mm | 13.50" | 1920x1280 | |
89 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Dell Latitude 13 7330 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 16.96 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
85.1 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.85 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2021 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.6 mm | 13.90" | 3000x2000 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
沟通
WLAN模块已经从英特尔AX201升级到AX211,支持Wi-Fi 6E。在与我们的6GHz网络配对时,我们没有遇到连接问题。
LTE 5G Cat 20或4G CAT 9是可选的WWAN升级。如果配置了该功能,将有一个Nano-SIM卡插槽。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P |
网络摄像头
戴尔将网络摄像头从第一代机型的720p更新为今年第二代版本的1080p。画面因此不那么浑浊,但色彩仍然不理想。
为了保护隐私,红外和物理网络摄像头快门都是标准配置。
维护
底部面板只需一把飞利浦螺丝刀就能轻松卸下。如下面的图片所示,除了重新定位的M.2 2242固态硬盘和其他小的调整外,内部结构与第一代机型基本相同。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件之外,盒子里没有任何额外的东西。考虑到该模型的高起价,一年的制造商有限保修是令人失望的。3年的保修应该是标准的。
显示
我们的第2代测试装置采用了与第1代原始版本不同的IPS面板(P101ZFZ-BH2与MND007ZA1-2)。尽管如此,它们的核心属性仍然几乎相同,基本上是相同的观看体验。用户仍然得到一个450尼特的面板,具有全sRGB覆盖和>1000:1的对比度。黑白和灰白的响应时间可能会更好,但对于浏览或办公室类型的工作负荷来说,这不是一个问题。
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 469.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 1269:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.85 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.22
ΔE Greyscale 5.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
68.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P P101ZFZ-BH2, IPS, 2160x1350, 13" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE MND007ZA1-2, IPS, 2160x1350, 13" | HP Elite Dragonfly G3 Chi Mei CMN13C0, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Dell Latitude 13 7330 LG Philips 133WF9, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel BOE CQ NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 TIANMA XM, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5% | 2% | -1% | 4% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.2 | 70.4 6% | 68 3% | 66.1 0% | 69.9 6% | 64.9 -2% |
sRGB Coverage | 96.1 | 99.9 4% | 98.3 2% | 93.5 -3% | 99.4 3% | 94.4 -2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.3 | 72 5% | 69.9 2% | 68.2 0% | 71.1 4% | 66.3 -3% |
Response Times | -8% | -28% | -14% | 7% | 6% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.6 ? | 46.8 ? -7% | 50.8 ? -17% | 48.4 ? -11% | 34.7 ? 20% | 37.6 ? 14% |
Response Time Black / White * | 25.6 ? | 28 ? -9% | 35.2 ? -38% | 29.6 ? -16% | 27.5 ? -7% | 26.4 ? -3% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 29% | 19% | 24% | 13% | 26% | |
Brightness middle | 469.6 | 460 -2% | 387.2 -18% | 460.1 -2% | 449.6 -4% | 502 7% |
Brightness | 460 | 434 -6% | 360 -22% | 445 -3% | 431 -6% | 474 3% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 92 -2% | 80 -15% | 89 -5% | 90 -4% | 89 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.27 27% | 0.26 30% | 0.31 16% | 0.31 16% | 0.33 11% |
Contrast | 1269 | 1704 34% | 1489 17% | 1484 17% | 1450 14% | 1521 20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.85 | 1.1 77% | 2.36 51% | 2.42 50% | 2.76 43% | 1.35 72% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.62 | 4.5 41% | 4.79 37% | 3.97 48% | 7.96 -4% | 3.67 52% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.22 | 1 18% | 0.63 48% | 0.77 37% | 0.58 52% | 1.2 2% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 1.6 72% | 3 47% | 2.3 60% | 5.2 9% | 1.7 70% |
Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.2 100% | 2.17 101% | 2.23 99% | 2.23 99% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 6931 94% | 6475 100% | 6137 106% | 6262 104% | 6475 100% | 6440 101% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65.7 | 61.1 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.9 | 94.3 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
18% | -2% /
9% | 3% /
13% | 8% /
10% | 10% /
17% |
* ... smaller is better
该面板开箱后没有得到很好的校准。我们自己校准它将大大改善平均灰度和色彩deltaE值,从5.7和4.85分别提高到2.3和1.22。我们建议最终用户进行校准,以更好地利用该面板的全部sRGB覆盖范围。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
43.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 21.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
由于联想没有为今年的机型提高显示屏的亮度或对比度,因此户外可视性和可视角度与第一代机型基本相同。
业绩
测试条件
在运行以下任何性能基准之前,我们通过Windows将我们的设备设置为 "最佳性能 "模式。建议用户熟悉预装的Vantage软件,因为许多联想特有的软件更新和用户存在感等功能都是在这里切换的,如下面的屏幕截图所示。
处理器
CPU性能是一个混合包。最初的CineBench R15多线程得分很高,达到2118分,但在接下来的连续运行后,这个分数急剧下降到1485分,代表涡轮增压的可持续性很差,而且比大多数其他笔记本电脑的节流更陡峭。事实上,正如我们下面的CineBench R15 xT循环测试所显示的那样,多线程性能在压力下可以下降48%。笔记本电脑 框架笔记本电脑采用所谓的较慢的 酷睿i7-1260P能够超过我们的i7-1280P在更长时间内的表现。换句话说,用户可以在联想的i7-1280P上享受最初的短暂速度爆发,然后再从悬崖上掉下来。
尽管性能有些令人失望,但X1 Nano Gen 2中的i7-1280P CPU仍然比以下产品快得多 酷睿i7-1160G7即使考虑到任何节流问题,X1 Nano Gen 1中的i7-1280P CPU仍然比Core i7-1160G7快了约80%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core i7-1280P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average Intel Core i7-1280P (7466 - 13068, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average Intel Core i7-1280P (5880 - 8571, n=6) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average Intel Core i7-1280P (18907 - 32766, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average Intel Core i7-1280P (4006 - 7184, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average Intel Core i7-1280P (36663 - 48416, n=6) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 |
系统性能
由于采用了酷睿P系列CPU,PCMark 10的结果始终高于第一代机型和其他大多数13.0英寸笔记本电脑。差异在数字内容创作分测试中最为明显。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Average Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5410 - 5994, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9719 - 10920, n=4) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6301 - 7453, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6450 - 7180, n=4) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1677 - 1773, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1585 - 1709, n=4) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1849 - 1928, n=4) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1394 - 1746, n=4) | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
PCMark 10 Score | 5482 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1280P (56337 - 73486, n=6) | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1280P (63221 - 73719, n=6) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1280P (58729 - 68247, n=6) | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core i7-1280P (93.1 - 153.3, n=6) | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示了在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题。在60 FPS下的4K视频播放可能会更好,因为在我们长达1分钟的视频测试中,我们能够记录到56个丢帧,即使是在截至本发布日期的最新图形驱动程序上。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P | |
Dell Latitude 13 7330 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试装置配备了 桥夏KBG5AZNT1T02PCIe3 NVMe固态硬盘,最大持续读取率高达2700 MB/s。考虑到ThinkPad X1 Nano的高价,结账时没有PCIe4选项,这令人失望,但至少该型号的SSD上有一块铜板,有助于散热。
请记住,不支持全长的2280 M.2驱动器。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
尽管有上面提到的陡峭的CPU性能节流,但图形性能还是不错的。3DMark的分数是相对于其他具有相同性能的笔记本电脑而言的。 Iris Xe 96 EUsGPU,但在运行实际游戏时,节流就开始了。例如,在最低768p设置下,空闲时的帧率 Witcher 3 在最低的768p设置下,在测试开始时帧率可以高达106 FPS,然后在几分钟后迅速下降到只有80 FPS,如下图所示。
在考虑到任何性能节流之前,总体图形性能仍然比去年的第一代机型快30%左右。
3DMark 11 Performance | 7141 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20344 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4967 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1906 points | |
Help |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 97.2 | 82.3 | 21.9 | 9.84 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 107.2 | 67.3 | 35 | 15.1 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 106.1 | 76 | 55.6 | 49 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 35.8 | 20.7 | 20.7 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 38.8 | 39.9 | 35.4 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 88.1 | 41 | 32 | 25.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 18.3 | 16.1 | 12.3 | 9.5 |
排放
系统噪音
风扇噪音与联想Vantage的三个电源配置文件有关。安静、平衡或智能冷却和最佳性能。即使在默认的智能冷却模式下,系统也比预期的要安静。例如,当运行3DMark 06的第一个基准场景时,内部风扇在整个场景中保持非常安静,就像我们在Dragonfly G3上看到的那样。 蜻蜓G3或MateBook X Pro在类似条件下观察到的情况。然而,当设置为最佳性能时,当运行更高的负载(如游戏)时,预计风扇的脉冲会更频繁,最高可达40 dB(A)。否则,我们建议在大多数情况下坚持使用智能冷却。
值得注意的是,我们的测试设备在桌面上空转时,会出现电子噪音或线圈啸叫。当运行3DMark 06时,噪音会暂时消失,这就解释了为什么我们在运行基准测试时的噪音测量值低于我们在桌面上空转时的噪音测量值(23.9对23.3 dB(A))。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 23.3 / 40.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.3 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1280P, Kioxia BG5 KBG5AZNT1T02 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G | HP Elite Dragonfly G3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | Dell Latitude 13 7330 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -11% | 6% | -8% | -18% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 23.3 | 24.9 -7% | 22.8 2% | 23.4 -0% | 22.8 2% | 25.4 -9% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.9 | 24.9 -4% | 23.2 3% | 23.4 2% | 23 4% | 25.6 -7% |
Idle Average * | 23.9 | 26.3 -10% | 23.2 3% | 23.4 2% | 23 4% | 25.6 -7% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.9 | 31.8 -33% | 23.2 3% | 23.4 2% | 23 4% | 25.6 -7% |
Load Average * | 23.3 | 34.3 -47% | 25.1 -8% | 37.8 -62% | 47.3 -103% | 28.7 -23% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.9 | 34.3 16% | 32 22% | 39.2 4% | 47.3 -16% | 32 22% |
Load Maximum * | 40.9 | 37.5 8% | 35.2 14% | 43 -5% | 49.8 -22% | 38.2 7% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
事实上,底部的热点更冷,只有40摄氏度,而去年的型号是48摄氏度,可能是由于上面提到的陡峭的性能节流。正如下面的温度图所示,预计键盘的左半部分总是比右半部分更热,因为CPU位于机箱的左侧。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.9 °C / -3.5 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE Intel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Elite Dragonfly G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell Latitude 13 7330 Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 1% | 2% | 8% | 4% | -7% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42.4 | 42.2 -0% | 39 8% | 38.6 9% | 36.8 13% | 42.2 -0% |
Maximum Bottom * | 40.2 | 47.5 -18% | 42.2 -5% | 42 -4% | 42.4 -5% | 40.4 -0% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.8 | 24.3 13% | 26.8 4% | 23.8 14% | 24.2 13% | 31.2 -12% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.8 | 25.3 9% | 28.2 -1% | 24.6 12% | 29 -4% | 32.2 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当在Prime95下受压时,CPU时钟速率和板卡功耗将分别飙升至3GHz和64W。然而,温度也会飙升到惊人的97摄氏度,因此这种最大的涡轮增压最多只能持续几秒钟,然后时钟频率和电路板功耗就会分别下降到1.3GHz和23W,核心温度也会略微降低到85摄氏度。 框架笔记本电脑装备的i7-1260P CPU上进行同样的测试,将导致更高的稳定时钟速率,相比之下,约为2.5 GHz。
运行时的GPU时钟速率和温度 Witcher 3将分别稳定在948兆赫和69摄氏度,而上述Framework则为1396兆赫和83摄氏度。
如果用电池供电运行,性能不会降低。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将分别返回物理和图形分数13122和6668分,而在主电源上则为11415和6937分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 44 |
Prime95压力 | 1.3 | -- | 85 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 0.7 | 399 | 71 |
Witcher 3 应力 | ~0.5 | 948 | 69 |
发言人
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
消耗功率
该系统通常比其他13英寸的副笔记本要求更高,因为它是少数配备酷睿P系列CPU的产品之一。仅仅在桌面上空转就会消耗3W到15W,而 HP Dragonfly G3, Latitude 7330或原来的ThinkPad X1 Nano在类似条件下的最高功率仅为7W或9W。
在运行要求更高的负载时,功耗差异甚至进一步扩大。3DMark 06或 Witcher 3例如,需要44瓦至55瓦,明显高于上述惠普、戴尔或原始X1 Nano。酷睿i7-1280P CPU可能更快,但它肯定是有代价的。
我们能够从小型(约8.7 x 5.2 x 2.2厘米)的65瓦交流适配器中记录到65.4瓦的临时最大耗电,然后就开始节流了,如下图所示。
Off / Standby | 0.26 / 0.59 Watt |
Idle | 3.4 / 6.5 / 14.4 Watt |
Load |
54.5 / 65.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Kioxia BG5 KBG5AZNT1T02, IPS, 2160x1350, 13" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G, IPS, 2160x1350, 13" | HP Elite Dragonfly G3 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Dell Latitude 13 7330 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 25% | 16% | 21% | -11% | -11% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 3.3 3% | 3.4 -0% | 2.8 18% | 5.3 -56% | 6.7 -97% |
Idle Average * | 6.5 | 5.7 12% | 5.6 14% | 4.8 26% | 8.4 -29% | 10 -54% |
Idle Maximum * | 14.4 | 9.1 37% | 8.4 42% | 7.3 49% | 11.2 22% | 10.3 28% |
Load Average * | 54.5 | 29.6 46% | 40.8 25% | 48.1 12% | 57.4 -5% | 35.7 34% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 44 | 27.7 37% | 35.5 19% | 35.4 20% | 46.7 -6% | 32.7 26% |
Load Maximum * | 65.4 | 55.1 16% | 68.4 -5% | 63.6 3% | 61.2 6% | 67.6 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
运行时间比去年的型号短了近一半(!),即使是在平衡电源配置文件上,可能是由于更苛刻的Core P系列CPU。在实际的WLAN使用中只有5个小时,X1 Nano第二代不会像其他大多数副笔记本那样持续很长时间。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 49.5 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 48.2 Wh | HP Elite Dragonfly G3 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 68 Wh | Dell Latitude 13 7330 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 41 Wh | Framework Laptop 13.5 12th Gen Intel i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 97% | 133% | 64% | 48% | 108% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 303 | 596 97% | 706 133% | 497 64% | 447 48% | 629 108% |
H.264 | 925 | |||||
Load | 98 | 209 | 84 | 182 | ||
Reader / Idle | 2268 | 1314 | 1167 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 一个轻量级的短跑运动员,但不是一个马拉松选手
ThinkPad X1 Nano第二代是一个完美的例子,说明当你把原本设计为运行15W CPU的笔记本电脑上的15W CPU换成28W CPU时会发生什么。你会看到更快的性能,但由于冷却解决方案的限制,这种性能提升只能是短时间内的。因此,该系统在短时间内的高性能可以派上用场,如启动应用程序、偶尔的图片编辑或解压缩小文件时,处于最佳状态。然而,如果你打算使用笔记本电脑进行持续时间较长的CPU密集型工作,那么这里的CPU可能没有你所希望的那么快。请记住,这是迄今为止大多数(如果不是所有)超轻(<1公斤)笔记本电脑的一个共同缺点,如 蜻蜓G3, Latitude 7330, 或LG Gram.
另一个需要考虑的重要方面是,电池寿命被大幅削减,因为尽管采用了更新、更耗电的CPU,但电池容量基本没有变化。因此,你可能需要在旅行时更注意充电。
不可否认,ThinkPad X1 Nano第2代比原来的第1代机型更快,但这是以缩短运行时间和潜在性能节流为代价的。
尽管CPU的Turbo Boost可持续性有限,X1 Nano第二代仍然是一个比旧的第一代型号快得多的系统,而不需要改变任何关于机箱、显示器或重量的东西。希望最大限度地提高处理器性能的用户可能要考虑更重的笔记本电脑,并有更强的冷却解决方案,如 ThinkPad T系列而不是。
价格和可用性
ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2现已通过经销商广泛发售,例如:Amazon 和Newegg 如果配置Core i5和FHD显示器,价格为1700美元,如果配置Core i7和2K显示器,价格为2300美元。另外,用户可以直接从联想购买https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/p/laptops/thinkpad/thinkpadx1/thinkpad-x1-nano-gen-2-(13-inch-intel)/len101t0008?org.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2 Core i7-1280P
- 09/04/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo