VAIO FE14笔记本电脑评论。避开酷睿i5-1235U,选择酷睿i7-1255U
与更高端的Vaio SX系列、超薄的Vaio Z系列或平板电脑Vaio A系列不同,Vaio FE系列是预算到中档的选择,具有更广泛的市场吸引力。FE系列目前有14.1英寸的FE14和15.6英寸的FE15型号可供选择。
我们审查的FE14型号配备了最新的英特尔12代酷睿i5-1235U CPU。该系统的其余部分对于其700美元的价格范围来说相当典型,包括1080p IPS显示屏,集成Iris Xe图形,以及16GB内存。更高端的配置可使用更快的酷睿i7-1255U。
这个领域的竞争者包括其他预算到中档的14英寸笔记本电脑,如 盖特威超薄14.1, 戴尔Inspiron 14 7420, 联想IdeaPad 3 14, 或 华硕VivoBook S14.
更多Vaio评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.6 kg | 19.8 mm | 14.10" | 1920x1080 | |
87.2 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.1 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
78 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.6 kg | 20.3 mm | 14.10" | 1920x1080 | |
83.7 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.86 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
79.2 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE Celeron 6305, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | 1.4 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
81.5 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2021 | Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 Pentium N6000, UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) | 1.3 kg | 14.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 朴实的外观
与光滑闪亮的SX12不同,FE14是一个更传统的预算设计,与联想IdeaPad或华硕Vivobook的视觉水平相似。然而,在机箱的刚性方面,我们的测试装置会表现出更多的翘曲和吱吱作响,即使对于一个廉价的模型来说也是如此。扭动底座的四角会导致可听到的吱嘎声,对掌托或键盘中心施加压力会使表面明显变形。竞争者惠普Pavilion 14相比之下,感觉设计更强。
与Vaio SX14或华硕Zenbook 14系列等价格较高的旗舰型14英寸笔记本电脑相比,FE14又大又重,但与其他经济型笔记本电脑相比,它在其他方面相当标准,如 联想IdeaPad 3 14或Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1。但我们确实希望它能更轻,因为1.6公斤的重量和许多15.6英寸超极本一样重。
连接性 - 不支持Thunderbolt
有一个健康的集成端口选择,包括3个USB-A和甚至一个千兆RJ-45端口。然而,令人费解的是,当大多数其他这种尺寸的超极本已经完全过渡到USB-C充电时,制造商继续集成一个专有的AC适配器桶状端口。我们希望有两个USB-C端口,而不是一个USB-C和一个AC适配器桶形端口。
不支持Thunderbolt。不过,USB-C充电和DisplayPort over USB-C都支持。
SD卡阅读器
集成的SD读卡器很慢,只有17MB/s。从我们的UHS-II卡向桌面传输1GB的图片几乎需要整整一分钟。此外,SD卡必须颠倒着插入,即使完全插入,也有三分之二的卡从边缘突出,这使得在不首先取出卡的情况下运输不安全。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 (AV Pro V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 (AV Pro V60) | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
沟通
英特尔AX201的标准配置是Wi-Fi 6和蓝牙5.2连接。当与我们的华硕测试路由器配对时,我们经历了一致的传输速率。不支持Wi-Fi 6E。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 |
网络摄像头
该系统集成了一个200万像素的网络摄像头,而不是更典型的100万像素,以获得更清晰的图像。然而,在我们的测试中,颜色很差,而且过紫。
有一个物理快门用于保护摄像头。红外线是不可用的,因此不支持Windows Hello。
维护
底部面板由15颗飞利浦螺钉固定。虽然螺丝本身很容易拆卸,但面板实际上非常困难,因为它的一个角很容易粘到RJ-45端口上。这是一个糟糕的设计,使简单的升级如内存或存储变得比它应该的要难得多。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外,盒子里没有其他额外的东西。如果在美国购买,则适用一年的标准有限保修。
输入设备--令人惊讶的舒适性
键盘
我们发现打字体验非常好,因为按键的反馈清晰、均匀,比其他大多数预算和中档超极本(如联想IdeaPad或华硕VivoBook系列)更强。缺点是,由于按键没有那么松软,所以咔嚓声比较大,音调也比较高。
触摸板
触摸板很小,仅有9.5 x 5厘米,而戴尔的触摸板为11.5 x 8厘米。 戴尔Inspiron 14 7420二合一.用于光标控制的可用表面区域甚至更小,因为左上角被保留给了指纹识别器。滑动性能是可靠的,即使它比我们希望的要稍微粘一些。
FE14是为数不多的仍在使用专用鼠标按钮的14英寸笔记本电脑之一,这也是触摸板尺寸小的原因。与其他大多数没有专用鼠标按钮的触摸板相比,其反馈是咔嚓咔嚓的,更容易实现拖放操作。即便如此,滚动和多点触摸输入还是感觉很拥挤。
显示 - 在预算范围内还算不错
我们的Vaio FE14采用了类似于奇美的IPS面板,就像在14 5420上发现的那样。 Latitude 14 5420或 联想ThinkBook 14(N140HCA-EAD vs. N140HCA-EAC)。由于其狭窄的69%sRGB色彩空间和平均响应时间,这是一个预算面板。同时,相对于其他预算和中档超极本,对比度和亮度都很不错。总的来说,画质比你在价格较高的超极本上得到的东西要低一个档次。VAIO SX14但对于这个价格来说,它仍然是非常好的。
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 278.1 cd/m²
Contrast: 1030:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.12
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
47.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
45.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL Chi Mei N140HCA-EAD, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.1" | VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K Sharp LQ140M1JW55, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 BOE CQ NV140FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.1" | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 BOE NV14N42, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE AU Optronics B140HAN04.E, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 Chi Mei N140HCA-EAC, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 44% | -9% | -16% | -20% | -9% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 45.7 | 66.8 46% | 41.4 -9% | 38.6 -16% | 36.6 -20% | 41.4 -9% |
sRGB Coverage | 68.6 | 97.7 42% | 61.8 -10% | 56.2 -18% | 54.7 -20% | 61.8 -10% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 47.2 | 67.9 44% | 42.8 -9% | 39.9 -15% | 37.8 -20% | 42.9 -9% |
Response Times | -59% | -10% | 25% | -13% | 15% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34.8 ? | 54 ? -55% | 36.4 ? -5% | 27.2 ? 22% | 44 ? -26% | 29 ? 17% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28.4 ? | 46.4 ? -63% | 32.4 ? -14% | 20.8 ? 27% | 28 ? 1% | 20 ? 30% |
PWM Frequency | 25250 ? | 25000 ? -1% | ||||
Screen | 35% | -16% | -23% | -15% | -3% | |
Brightness middle | 278.1 | 373.4 34% | 213.9 -23% | 269.4 -3% | 368 32% | 295 6% |
Brightness | 256 | 376 47% | 208 -19% | 260 2% | 332 30% | 265 4% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 82 -6% | 89 2% | 83 -5% | 85 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.23 15% | 0.21 22% | 0.41 -52% | 0.47 -74% | 0.31 -15% |
Contrast | 1030 | 1623 58% | 1019 -1% | 657 -36% | 783 -24% | 952 -8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.01 | 2.99 25% | 6.97 -74% | 6.53 -63% | 6.14 -53% | 5.43 -35% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.76 | 5.29 72% | 18.69 -0% | 19.76 -5% | 17.76 5% | 9.51 49% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.12 | 0.49 84% | 2 36% | 3.13 -0% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 4.3 -23% | 6.2 -77% | 5.4 -54% | 4.44 -27% | 4.19 -20% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.02 109% | 2.16 102% | 2.05 107% | 2.73 81% | 2.11 104% |
CCT | 7247 90% | 6537 99% | 8084 80% | 6007 108% | 5979 109% | 7084 92% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
23% | -12% /
-14% | -5% /
-15% | -16% /
-15% | 1% /
-0% |
* ... smaller is better
色温在~7200时略微过冷,导致平均DeltaE值较高。一旦正确校准,平均灰度和彩色deltaE值可分别低至1.7和3.12。蓝色和洋红色的颜色明显比其他测试的颜色更不准确,正如我们下面的CalMAN测量结果所示。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 12 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25250 Hz | ≤ 24 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 25250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 24 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25250 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
户外能见度有限,因为显示屏的亮度不足以克服大多数自然光。在明亮或阳光灿烂的日子里,图像几乎会被完全洗掉。哑光覆盖层有助于减少眩光,以便在阴凉处获得更好的观看体验。
性能 - 酷睿i5-1235U配置
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们通过Windows将我们的设备设置为性能。似乎没有任何预装的Vaio专用命令中心软件。
处理器
整体的CPU性能与上一代非常接近 酷睿i5-1135G7.事实上,多线程结果几乎等同于 LG Gram 14T90P而在单线程基准测试中仅领先10%。用户可能想考虑升级到酷睿i7-1255U配置,根据我们对戴尔Inspiron 14 7420二合一电脑的经验,它的多线程性能比Core i5-1235U大约快60%。否则,i5-1235U可以说是令人失望的,因为它比11代Tiger Lake-U没有提供多少东西。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
HP ProBook 445 G8-3Z6Q8ES | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (1783 - 3537, n=8) | |
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
LG Gram 14T90P | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (566 - 651, n=8) | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
HP ProBook 445 G8-3Z6Q8ES | |
LG Gram 14T90P | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
LG Gram 14T90P | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (366 - 662, n=8) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
HP ProBook 445 G8-3Z6Q8ES | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
HP ProBook 445 G8-3Z6Q8ES | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (20166 - 38643, n=8) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
LG Gram 14T90P | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
HP ProBook 445 G8-3Z6Q8ES | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (4371 - 5233, n=8) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
LG Gram 14T90P | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (5528 - 8571, n=10) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
HP ProBook 445 G8-3Z6Q8ES | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
LG Gram 14T90P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (1426 - 1643, n=10) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
LG Gram 14T90P | |
HP ProBook 445 G8-3Z6Q8ES | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
HP ProBook 445 G8-3Z6Q8ES | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (4.99 - 9.43, n=8) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
LG Gram 14T90P | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
HP ProBook 445 G8-3Z6Q8ES | |
LG Gram 14T90P | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (42.4 - 65.5, n=8) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE | |
LG Gram 14T90P | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021 AMD | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5425 6VPKR | |
HP ProBook 445 G8-3Z6Q8ES | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (0.4986 - 0.603, n=8) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (3078 - 7457, n=8) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (15838 - 37760, n=8) | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (978 - 2072, n=8) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (45680 - 62404, n=8) | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (3099 - 4644, n=8) | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (8046 - 18819, n=8) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (23386 - 67140, n=8) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (329 - 633, n=8) | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (1670 - 3928, n=8) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (15933 - 41909, n=8) | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 |
系统性能
PCMark 10的结果略微落后于更昂贵的VAIO SX14,但在其他方面与Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1相似。盖特威超薄14.1.有趣的是,CrossMark的结果更接近戴尔Inspiron 14 7420二合一产品及其Core i7-1255U CPU,而不是上述的Gateway。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4528 - 5543, n=8) | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (9143 - 11273, n=8) | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6440 - 7354, n=8) | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4220 - 5839, n=8) | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (983 - 1644, n=8) | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1026 - 1676, n=8) | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1032 - 1618, n=8) | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (746 - 1867, n=8) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 |
PCMark 10 Score | 4878 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (24653 - 61921, n=8) | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (24441 - 66108, n=8) | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (25156 - 75808, n=8) | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (76.3 - 119, n=8) | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示,在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签或以60 FPS播放4K视频时,DPC问题非常严重。因此,在我们长达1分钟的视频测试中,我们记录了16个丢帧,而它应该是0。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL | |
Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 没有二级托架
我们的设备包括一个经济型中档的1TB PCIe3 x4 NVMe SSD,来自于 的1TB PCIe3 x4 NVMe固态硬盘。 提供连续读取和写入率分别为2000MB/s和1100MB/s。像三星PM981a这样价格较高的驱动器往往具有更快的传输速率,接近3000MB/s。然而,当考虑到FE14的目标受众时,Netac在速度方面已经足够了。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - Iris Xe 80 EUs
图形性能相对较差,比我们数据库中配备同样集成的笔记本电脑慢10%至15%。 Iris Xe 80 EUsGPU。升级到Iris Xe 96 EUs可以提供20%至40%的性能,如果图形功率是一个问题。
游戏性能甚至更差,比预期的要慢20%到30%。我们的设备在空转时似乎也有问题,以维持稳定的帧率。 Witcher 3正如我们下面的图表所显示的。帧率会持续地从45FPS范围下降到30FPS范围,似乎没有任何理由。这绝对不是休闲游戏所需的配置。
3DMark 11 Performance | 4579 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13306 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2750 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1097 points | |
Help |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 - 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (9.1 - 17.8, n=7) | |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 50 | 46.2 | 11.9 | 5.69 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 41.8 | 26.5 | 14.7 | 8.4 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 84.8 | 57.5 | 34.1 | 31.2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 21.8 | 13.5 | 9.48 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 37.5 | 26.3 | 24.1 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 50.9 | 22.3 | 18.5 | 15.4 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 9.1 |
排放
系统噪音 - 相当安静
风扇噪音比许多其他14英寸超极本更安静。例如,运行3DMark 06的第一个基准场景,将导致风扇噪音略低于29 dB(A),而安静的背景为24 dB(A)。相比之下,VAIO SX14或Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1在类似条件下会在30dB(A)以上的范围。更高的负载,如游戏,将使风扇噪音达到最大的37 dB(A),这仍然比许多竞争对手的噪音要小得多。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.8 / 23.8 / 23.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 28.6 / 37.3 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.8 dB(A) |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, Netac S930E 1TB | VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1195G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, W800S W800SHMQ 512GB SSD | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-512G | Acer TravelMate P6 TMP614P-52-724G Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX016N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -19% | -7% | -7% | -9% | |
off / environment * | 23.8 | 23.8 -0% | 23.1 3% | 23.1 3% | 25.4 -7% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.8 | 24.3 -2% | 23.3 2% | 24.7 -4% | 25.4 -7% |
Idle Average * | 23.8 | 24.3 -2% | 23.3 2% | 24.7 -4% | 25.4 -7% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.8 | 31.3 -32% | 23.3 2% | 24.7 -4% | 25.4 -7% |
Load Average * | 28.6 | 36.6 -28% | 39.7 -39% | 27.7 3% | 38 -33% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.1 | 49.6 -34% | 40.5 -9% | 45.1 -22% | |
Load Maximum * | 37.3 | 51.5 -38% | 40.7 -9% | 45.1 -21% | 35.2 6% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
键盘的最中心是Vaio FE的热点,这通常是不理想的。幸运的是,系统的温度并不高,所以热点的触感并不令人感到不舒服。我们能够记录到G键上的热点只有34摄氏度到35摄氏度,当运行苛刻的负载超过一个小时时。
底部表面可以变得更热,几乎达到40摄氏度,而Vaio SX14是49摄氏度,Gateway是32摄氏度。盖特威超薄型14.1.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 20.3 °C / 69 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.2 °C / 75.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+4.6 °C / 8.2 F).
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K Intel Core i7-1195G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE Intel Celeron 6305, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 Intel Pentium Silver N6000, Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -9% | -4% | -15% | -24% | -16% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 34.4 | 36.2 -5% | 36.2 -5% | 38.2 -11% | 38.6 -12% | 38.9 -13% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42 | 50.2 -20% | 32.2 23% | 45.6 -9% | 41 2% | 43.3 -3% |
Idle Upper Side * | 21.6 | 21.4 1% | 26.4 -22% | 27.4 -27% | 32.6 -51% | 28.5 -32% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.2 | 27.8 -10% | 28.4 -13% | 28.4 -13% | 33.9 -35% | 29.6 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当运行Prime95对CPU施加压力时,时钟频率和主板功耗将分别提升到3.5GHz和55W,仅在最初的几秒钟内,直到核心温度达到100C。此后,时钟频率和主板功耗将分别下降到850MHz和15W,以保持核心温度低于70C。
当运行 Witcher 3代表高负载时,GPU时钟速率和温度将分别稳定在848 MHz和67 C,而Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1在类似条件下为1000 MHz和54 C。我们的Vaio比Gateway的运行速度更慢,温度更高,尽管两者都使用了相同的Core i5-1235U CPU。
用电池供电运行并不限制性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试会得到大致相同的分数。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 42 |
Prime95压力 | 1.0 | -- | 69 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 0.8 | 449 | 69 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 1.1 | 848 | 67 |
发言人
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功耗 - 对于Alder Lake CPU来说非常出色
功耗与我们在Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1上记录的非常接近,因为两款机型都使用了相同的处理器。这款 Inspiron 14 7420二合一使用更快的酷睿i7-1255U,但在运行CPU重的任务时,它的要求也要高得多,大约为45%。
在运行极端负载时,我们能够从小型(约6.5 x 6.5 x 3厘米)的60瓦交流适配器中记录到56瓦的最大功耗。然而,由于该型号的Turbo Boost潜力有限,这一比率只是暂时的,如下图所示。用户可以预期在运行最紧张的情况下,消耗约为29W。
Off / Standby | 0.21 / 0.86 Watt |
Idle | 3.5 / 5.7 / 7.9 Watt |
Load |
30.1 / 55.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Netac S930E 1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.1" | VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, W800S W800SHMQ 512GB SSD, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.1" | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE Celeron 6305, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, SK Hynix BC711 HFM128GD3HX015N, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-P6U1 Pentium N6000, UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU), 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -67% | 4% | -34% | 6% | 47% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 3.3 6% | 3.5 -0% | 5.2 -49% | 3.7 -6% | 2.4 31% |
Idle Average * | 5.7 | 13.9 -144% | 5 12% | 8.2 -44% | 7.1 -25% | 4.1 28% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.9 | 15.9 -101% | 7.7 3% | 9.9 -25% | 8.2 -4% | 4.7 41% |
Load Average * | 30.1 | 54 -79% | 32 -6% | 44.4 -48% | 26 14% | 13.6 55% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 28.4 | 46.6 -64% | 30.2 -6% | 35 -23% | 24.3 14% | 14.3 50% |
Load Maximum * | 55.8 | 66 -18% | 45.7 18% | 62.5 -12% | 31.4 44% | 12.1 78% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
运行时间是可敬的,在充满电的情况下,实际使用WLAN的时间刚刚超过8小时,与VAIO SX14或Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1相当。从空电到满电大约需要90分钟。
如果你在旅行中碰巧丢失或忘记携带专有的桶形充电器,该系统可以通过USB-C充电。
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 55 Wh | VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K i7-1195G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh | Gateway Ultra Slim 14.1 GWTC51427 i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 51 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 54 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 82H700CCGE Celeron 6305, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 38 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 38% | -16% | 5% | -11% | |
Reader / Idle | 789 | 2046 159% | 954 21% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 483 | 532 10% | 405 -16% | 455 -6% | 429 -11% |
Load | 128 | 58 -55% | 127 -1% |
Pros
Cons
评语--开始显示其年龄
Vaio FE14感觉像是一台停留在过去的笔记本电脑。虽然我们知道它应该是一个经济实惠的机型,但这并不意味着它应该仍然带有被今天的标准所淘汰的功能。更具体地说,FE14应该完全过渡到USB-C充电,并有一个支持指纹的电源按钮,而不是在已经很小的触摸板上占用宝贵空间的指纹识别器。价格相近的 联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 14或 华硕Vivobook 14系列在这方面是更强的选择,它们也更容易服务。
还有一些额外的小抱怨,这些抱怨加起来。颠倒的SD读卡器,弱小的扬声器,明显的屏幕出血,以及尖锐的DPC问题都对用户体验产生了负面影响。
Vaio FE14可能搭载了最新的英特尔CPU,但机箱可以使用一些重大的更新,以更多地与竞争的预算到中档超极本相媲美。
至于处理器,酷睿i5-1235U的性能非常接近于 酷睿i5-1135G7买家可以通过选择上一代CPU配置来省钱,而不会失去任何显著的性能提升。否则,我们建议考虑快得多的 酷睿i7-1255U配置,如果12代CPU是必须的。
Vaio在其辩护中做了几件事,包括舒适的键盘和考虑到价格的广泛的端口选项。然而,毫无疑问,还有很多改进的余地。
价格和可用性
沃尔玛 目前正在运送配备Core i5-1235U CPU和8GB内存的Vaio FE14,售价700美元,或16GB内存,售价800美元。.酷睿i7-1255U版本也是,运费为950美元。.
VAIO FE 14.1 VWNC51429-SL
- 07/30/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo