申克 Vision 14 2023 评测:电池续航时间超长的镁合金超极本
申克公司升级了其紧凑型 Vision 14 超极本,配备了英特尔最新的 Raptor-Lake 处理器和可选的 GeForce RTX 3050 Refresh。我们的评测样品是 iGPU 机型,配备了 酷睿 i7-13700H32 GB 内存、快速 1 TB 固态硬盘和 14 英寸哑光 IPS 面板(16:10),分辨率为 2,880 x 1,800,频率为 90 Hz。Vision 14 的起价为 1,549 欧元,我们的测试配置价格约为 1,680 欧元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.9 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 987 g | 16.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.5 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.50" | 2880x1800 | |
89 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 | |
90.2 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
85.6 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
箱子和设备
与去年相比,Vision 14 的外壳没有任何变化,仍然使用镁合金,有银色和黑色两种。除了颜色之外,没有任何区别,但黑色版本更容易沾染指纹。底座的稳定性非常好,但盖子非常薄,在扭转压力下会有一点扭曲,但不会产生嘎吱声或图像错误。今年的薄弱环节再次出现在铰链上,因为盖子会明显晃动。最大开启角度约为 160 度。
底盖仅用五颗十字螺丝固定,很容易拆卸。WLAN 模块、两个内存模块和 M.2 2280 固态硬盘均可更换。不过,由于采用了 99 Wh 的大容量电池,因此不再有第二个 M2 插槽。
与前几代产品不同的是,Vision 14 只提供配备 99 Wh 大容量电池的机型,而不再提供配备 53 Wh 电池的更薄(1 毫米)、更轻(约 1.1 千克)的机型,因此重量增加到 1.27 千克(配备 RTX GPU 的机型约为 1.31 千克)。尽管如此,Vision 14 仍然是较轻的机型之一。只有LG Gram Style 14 明显更轻,不到 1 千克,但有些设备更重,达到 1.5-1.6 千克。
根据 GPU 的选择,Vision 14 配备了 130 瓦或 150 瓦的电源。150 瓦充电器更现代、更小巧,但重量都在 500 克左右,而且都使用专有的充电端口。
在端口方面,几乎没有什么可诟病的,因为日常生活所需的一切都一应俱全。借助右侧的 Thunderbolt 4 端口,您还可以连接外置显卡。在我们的 iGPU 版本中,左侧 USB-C 端口不支持Display Port ALT 功能;只有配备 Nvidia GPU 的 Vision 14 才支持该功能。支持 USB-C 电源(最小 65 瓦,最大 100 瓦)。
与去年的机型相比,功能齐全的 SD 卡读卡器速度变慢了,现在似乎是通过 USB 2.0 连接的,因为我们测定的传输速率只有 20 多 MB/s。WLAN 模块(英特尔 AX201)也没有变化,性能稳定。Vision 14 的天线配置不支持 6 GHz 网络(Wi-Fi 6E),因此没有提供相应的模块。1080p 网络摄像头发挥了作用。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
Networking | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
输入设备 - 背光键盘和玻璃触摸板
输入设备与去年相比没有变化 背光键盘提供了舒适的键入感,长时间打字也没有问题。背光键盘提供了舒适的键入感觉,长篇文字也不成问题,但在我们的评测样本中,按键略有晃动。大尺寸玻璃触摸板也运行良好,只是咔嗒声仍然有些过大。
显示屏 - 90 Hz 的 IPS 面板
关于显示屏,我们可以再次简单介绍一下,因为它仍然是 16:10 格式的哑光 3K IPS 显示屏(2,880 x 1,800)。主观画质非常好,明亮的表面没有颗粒感。移动流畅,没有重影效果,尽管响应时间不是最快的。没有检测到 PWM 闪烁。
申克公司规定的亮度为 380 cd/m²,我们的测试也证实了这一点。不过,亮度值略低于前代产品,这与正常的系列分散性相符。黑色值为 0.27 cd/m²,最大对比度接近 1,500:1,非常不错。我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对面板进行了测量,其数值在交付状态下已经非常不错。没有偏色现象,除了 100% 红色之外,其他颜色的偏差也低于重要的 DeltaE-2000 偏差 3。该面板完全覆盖了 sRGB 色彩空间。
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 402 cd/m²
Contrast: 1489:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
75.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
74.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 CSOT T3 MNE007ZA1-3, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Samsung SDC417F ATNA40YK10-1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Samsung, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 LEN145WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 LEN145-3K, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Samsung ATNA40CU02-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 14" | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti MNE007ZA1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 20% | 19% | -3% | 16% | 20% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 74.7 | 99.92 34% | 99 33% | 71.8 -4% | 98.7 32% | 99.7 33% | 74.1 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.6 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.2 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 97.4 -2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 75.8 | 94.71 25% | 95 25% | 73.1 -4% | 87.6 16% | 95.7 26% | 75.3 -1% |
Response Times | 91% | 91% | -51% | -1% | 99% | 4% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32.2 ? | 2 ? 94% | 2 ? 94% | 43.2 ? -34% | 31.5 ? 2% | 0.5 ? 98% | 31.5 ? 2% |
Response Time Black / White * | 15.4 ? | 2 ? 87% | 2 ? 87% | 25.9 ? -68% | 15.8 ? -3% | 0.1 ? 99% | 14.5 ? 6% |
PWM Frequency | 350 | 250 ? | 240 ? | ||||
Screen | 31% | 270% | -54% | 27% | 283% | -32% | |
Brightness middle | 402 | 384 -4% | 372 -7% | 386 -4% | 441 10% | 409 2% | 421 5% |
Brightness | 371 | 388 5% | 376 1% | 366 -1% | 453 22% | 410 11% | 416 12% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 97 13% | 98 14% | 91 6% | 92 7% | 99 15% | 89 3% |
Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.054 80% | 0.01 96% | 0.26 4% | 0.34 -26% | 0.01 96% | 0.28 -4% |
Contrast | 1489 | 7111 378% | 37200 2398% | 1485 0% | 1297 -13% | 40900 2647% | 1504 1% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 2.47 -37% | 2.01 -12% | 3.8 -111% | 0.6 67% | 2.36 -31% | 3.2 -78% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.6 | 4.33 -20% | 4.05 -13% | 9.1 -153% | 1.3 64% | 4.07 -13% | 5.5 -53% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.5 | 2.81 -87% | 2.17 -45% | 1.2 20% | 0.6 60% | 3.16 -111% | 2 -33% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 2.63 -46% | 1.84 -2% | 6.2 -244% | 0.8 56% | 3.06 -70% | 4.4 -144% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.18 101% | 2.39 92% | 2.09 105% | 2.2 100% | 2.49 88% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6695 97% | 6279 104% | 6488 100% | 6618 98% | 6597 99% | 6882 94% | 6384 102% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 47% /
37% | 127% /
191% | -36% /
-42% | 14% /
21% | 134% /
200% | -10% /
-21% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
15.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.6 ms rise | |
↘ 9.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
32.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.9 ms rise | |
↘ 17.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Vision 14 的哑光显示屏在户外也能舒适使用,在视角稳定性方面没有大问题。从以上角度观察时,面板只会稍微变亮。
性能 - Raptor Lake-H45
Vision 14 M23 仅配备猛禽湖酷睿 i7-13700H。如前所述GeForce RTX 3050 Refresh与去年的型号相比,现在使用的是 DDR5-4800 内存,而不是 DDR4-3200 内存。
测试条件
申克公司在预装的控制中心提供两种不同的性能配置文件:静音 和高性能。在"静音"模式下,处理器的最大 TDP 降至 20 瓦,而在 "性能 "模式(以及 "平衡 "和"发烧"两个子模式)下,最大 TDP 为 45 -> 40 瓦。这与前代产品相比有所降低,前代产品允许处理器在短时间内消耗高达 60 瓦的功率,然后在 40 瓦时趋于平稳。我们选择Enthusiast 配置文件进行以下基准测试和测量。
处理器 - 酷睿 i7-13700H
酷睿 i7-13700H 酷睿 i7-13700H是去年的 酷睿 i7-12700H(Alder Lake)的直接继承者,性能值最终完全相同。不过,在当前的 Vision 14 M23 中,处理器只允许短时间消耗 45 瓦,而不是去年机型的 60 瓦,这就是新机型多核性能最初较差的原因。在持续负载情况下,两者的运行功耗均为规定的 40 瓦,实际上不相上下。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
虽然酷睿 i7-13700H 是一款 45 瓦的处理器,但它很少作为 45 瓦处理器使用,在极端情况下功耗可超过 120 瓦。因此,人们可能会认为 Raptor-Lake P 处理器(4 个 P 核心)是更好的选择,但事实并非如此。通过与酷睿 i7-1360P 处理器的直接比较,我们可以清楚地看到这一点。酷睿 i7-1360P的 联想 Yoga 9 14由于短期功耗较高,i7-1360P 最初的运行速度较快,但在 38 瓦的功耗下,它明显落后于 40 瓦的 i7-13700H(约 13%)。
在电池供电情况下,处理器的最大功耗为 40 瓦(实际功耗达到 40 瓦需要几秒钟的时间),这就是多核性能降低约 14% 的原因。更多 CPU 基准测试这里.
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (5890 - 20034, n=28) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=63, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1323 - 1914, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2322 - 7674, n=28) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (508 - 741, n=28) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (905 - 2982, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (213 - 278, n=28) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (169 - 555, n=28) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (27322 - 76344, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4825 - 6238, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6165 - 14215, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1362 - 1919, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6.72 - 21.2, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=58, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=57, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (31.3 - 62.4, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (0.4308 - 0.607, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4986 - 18908, n=28) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (25360 - 92359, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=58, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1339 - 4224, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (68763 - 107159, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=58, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4800 - 11050, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12321 - 45118, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (28769 - 151254, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (389 - 1215, n=28) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=58, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2540 - 10135, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12872 - 52727, n=28) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
系统性能
我们对其性能的主观印象非常好,在日常使用中,所有输入都能顺利实现。测试过程中也没有出现任何问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5531 - 6247, n=4) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9961 - 11401, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=50, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=50, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7072 - 7691, n=4) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6413 - 7727, n=4) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1548 - 1868, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=56, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1500 - 1787, n=4) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1620 - 2009, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=56, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1456 - 1715, n=4) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
PCMark 10 Score | 5687 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=58, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (24334 - 78081, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (23681 - 79656, n=28) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 117898, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (22986 - 99898, n=28) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (82.4 - 136.8, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试(网页浏览、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,我们的测试设备在当前 BIOS 版本下运行实时音频应用程序时显示出了局限性。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
你可以在配置器中选择不同的固态硬盘,我们的测试设备包含 1 TB 版本的三星 990 Pro,这是一款高速 PCIe 4.0 硬盘。传输速率极高,高达 7 GB/秒,而且即使在长时间负载的情况下也能保持稳定,这一点是毋庸置疑的。我们的技术部分.
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
图形输出仍由英特尔集成的Iris Xe Graphics G7 处理。选择可选专用GeForce GPU 的用户现在将获得配备 6 GB 内存的刷新版GeForce RTX 3050 ;去年的型号是配备 4 GB 内存的 RTX 3050 Ti。两款 dGPU 的性能应该大致相当,但由于增加了 VRAM,新的 RTX 3050 Refresh 在高细节或高分辨率方面的限制更少。
不出意外,Iris Xe Graphics G7 的性能保持不变,当然足以满足高分辨率视频播放等日常活动的需求,但那些想用 Vision 14 玩游戏的用户一定要多花 275 欧元购买专用 GPU,否则即使是旧版游戏,也会受限于低/中细节。至少在长时间的游戏过程中,性能会保持稳定。
在电池供电的情况下,GPU 性能会降低约 10%。更多基准测试这里.
3DMark 11 Performance | 7781 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5591 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2047 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
Average of class Subnotebook (302 - 548, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (336 - 1259, n=101) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=60, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 43.7, n=52, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=55, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG | |
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 122.2 | 109.9 | 25.6 | 10.6 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 94 | 63 | 36 | 14.8 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 96 | 72.3 | 63.1 | 56.2 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 44 | 26.1 | 18.2 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 47.8 | 39.4 | 35.5 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 55 | 30 | 28 | 26 | 18 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 84.9 | 41.9 | 33.6 | 27.7 | |
F1 2021 (2021) | 101.5 | 52.1 | 40.4 | 28.9 | |
F1 22 (2022) | 45.7 | 41.3 | 30.4 | ||
F1 23 (2023) | 42.4 | 37.7 | 26.6 |
排放与能源
噪音
遗憾的是,在日常使用中,两个风扇的启动速度相当快,这也适用于静音 模式。虽然音量不是很大,但还是有点恼人。在负载情况下,风扇转速很快就会达到 42-45 dB(A),这对于一款纯 iGPU 机型来说是相当高的,因为它还使用了液态金属来实现更好的散热,而且与前代 RTX 3050 Ti 相差无几,当时我们记录到的最高噪音略低于 49 dB(A)。在静音 模式下,两个风扇的最大噪音为 36.4 分贝(A)。没有检测到其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.5 / 24.5 / 30.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 39.5 / 44.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.5 dB(A) |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 Radeon 680M, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 6% | 0% | 7% | -4% | -5% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 24.5 | 25 -2% | 25.2 -3% | 24.2 1% | 22.9 7% | 25.2 -3% | 24.4 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.5 | 25 -2% | 25.2 -3% | 24.2 1% | 22.9 7% | 25.2 -3% | 24.4 -0% |
Idle Average * | 24.5 | 25 -2% | 25.2 -3% | 24.2 1% | 22.9 7% | 25.2 -3% | 24.4 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.4 | 25 18% | 26.5 13% | 24.2 20% | 36.8 -21% | 32 -5% | 27.8 9% |
Load Average * | 39.5 | 37 6% | 39.8 -1% | 36.2 8% | 43.7 -11% | 45.25 -15% | 43.3 -10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.7 | 37 11% | 42.7 -2% | 46.2 -11% | 48.2 -16% | ||
Load Maximum * | 44.9 | 40.62 10% | 45.5 -1% | 36.2 19% | 46.2 -3% | 45.3 -1% | 48.8 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Vision 14 的表面温度从未达到临界值。正常使用时,机箱始终保持凉爽宜人的温度,我们在压力测试中仅在少数几个地方测得超过 40 °C的温度。最热的地方在键盘中上部,打字时也很明显,但这并不会造成任何限制。即使在负载情况下,将笔记本放在大腿上也没有问题。
在综合 CPU/GPU 负载的压力测试中,处理器最初的工作功率为 45 瓦,几分钟后降至 40 瓦。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.1 °C / 1.9 F).
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 7% | -10% | 4% | -5% | -12% | -13% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45.8 | 36.3 21% | 38.9 15% | 39.2 14% | 41.6 9% | 43.9 4% | 48.4 -6% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42 | 36.8 12% | 43.4 -3% | 49.8 -19% | 55.7 -33% | 50.7 -21% | 57.1 -36% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.5 | 29.2 -6% | 33.5 -22% | 24.2 12% | 25.9 6% | 30.8 -12% | 28.1 -2% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.1 | 27.4 -1% | 35.3 -30% | 25.1 7% | 28 -3% | 31.6 -17% | 29 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
与去年的型号相比,我们在立体声扬声器上看到了不同之处:尽管声音仍然有些单薄,但整体质量有所提高。至少,Vision 14 现在可以与其他竞争对手媲美,如Yoga Pro 7 14.
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
申克公司已经将空闲功耗降低了一些,因为新机型的最大功耗仅为 8 瓦,而不是前代产品的 11.4 瓦。当然,显示屏颜色稍深也是一个原因,但这并不能解释两者之间的巨大差异,这也是为什么必须进行进一步优化的原因。在负载情况下,我们测得的最大功率为 76 瓦,但几分钟后就稳定在 68 瓦左右。因此,附带的 130 瓦电源实际上过大了,如果使用更紧凑的 90 瓦型号就足够了。
Off / Standby | 0.63 / 1.1 Watt |
Idle | 4.2 / 7.4 / 8 Watt |
Load |
42.8 / 76 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | LG Gram Style 14Z90RS-G.AD7AG i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 14 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 14" | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -2% | -17% | -16% | -87% | -8% | -66% | -15% | -4% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 3.58 15% | 6 -43% | 4.1 2% | 7.6 -81% | 4.2 -0% | 7.5 -79% | 5.34 ? -27% | 4.43 ? -5% |
Idle Average * | 7.4 | 7.125 4% | 7 5% | 7.7 -4% | 13.3 -80% | 4.7 36% | 10.4 -41% | 8.55 ? -16% | 7.58 ? -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 8 | 12.1 -51% | 11.8 -48% | 7.9 1% | 13.7 -71% | 11.4 -43% | 11.4 -43% | 10.8 ? -35% | 9.43 ? -18% |
Load Average * | 42.8 | 40.67 5% | 44 -3% | 66.2 -55% | 88.2 -106% | 61.5 -44% | 83.3 -95% | 45.3 ? -6% | 45.8 ? -7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.9 | 42.6 11% | 61.5 -28% | 94.2 -97% | 55.1 -15% | 92.7 -94% | |||
Load Maximum * | 76 | 64.2 16% | 95 -25% | 84.3 -11% | 143 -88% | 64 16% | 110.3 -45% | 67.5 ? 11% | 68.7 ? 10% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
Vision 14 的电池续航能力非常出色,与前代产品相比,它的优化也非常明显。在 150 cd/m²(相当于最大亮度的 37%)的 WLAN 测试中,我们使用 99 Wh 的大容量电池记录了近 14 小时的续航时间。在全屏亮度下,这个时间仍然超过了 10 小时,这是一个显著的进步,只有 WQHD 版本的联想 Yoga 7 才有这样的表现。 联想 Yoga Pro 7 14才能跟上。在设备开启的情况下,充满电需要 2 个小时,而 70% 的电量只需不到 1 个小时即可恢复。
Pros
Cons
结论 - Vision 14 2023 以其强大的后劲令人信服
申克 Vision 14 的 2023 型号让人感觉非常熟悉。这款小巧的超极本近年来经历了多次变化,现在只有配备 99 Wh 大容量电池的基本型号,这也是早期型号的第二个 M.2 插槽不再可用的原因。现在的重量略低于 1.3 千克,显然已经脱离了 1 千克的型号。镁合金机身(可选银色或黑色)的质量依然令人印象深刻,维护选项也非常不错。只有铰链有些晃动,仍然是设计中的一个弱点。
与旧款 Alder Lake 处理器相比,新款 Raptor Lake 处理器的性能出人意料地略有下降,这是由于短期负载下的功率限制降低了。对于我们来说,这种下降是不可理解的,但整体性能仍然不错。在这个 40 瓦左右的性能级别中,目前的 AMD 处理器自然是更好的选择,而且还能提供更快的 iGPU,但目前还没有。90 Hz、3K 显示屏仍然不错,在日常生活中没有任何问题,但竞争品牌现在提供了许多 120 Hz 或 P3 显示屏的机型,因此申克需要尽快提升一个级别,以保持竞争力。
Schenker Vision 14 M23 配备了新的 Raptor Lake 处理器,如果选择 iGPU 变体,只能算是小幅升级。不过,它的整体性能还是不错的,电池续航能力有所提高,维护选项也不错,但日常工作中有些躁动的风扇可能会让人烦恼。
最大的优势当然是超长的电池续航时间,这不仅得益于 99 Wh 的电池,还得益于优化的功耗。即使在全屏亮度下,我们的 WLAN 测试也能运行 10 多个小时,而在调整亮度下,13-14 个小时也很容易实现。几乎所有竞争对手在这方面都明显处于劣势。事实上,iGPU 版本还配备了 130 瓦的大功率电源,这是没有必要的;更紧凑的 90 瓦型号就足够了。
不过,Vision 14 1549 欧元的基本售价并不便宜,这个价位的竞争产品很多。非常不错的 联想 Yoga Pro 7配备 AMD 处理器和 90 Hz 显示屏,售价约为 1,100 欧元(联想美国公司售价为 1050 美元),而配备酷睿 i7 处理器、Intel® Core™ 处理器、Intel® Radeon™ 处理器和 Intel® Core™ 处理器的 配备酷睿 i7 处理器、RTX 4050和 120 Hz 3K 显示屏的变体售价约为 1,700 欧元,显然比 Vision 14 的 dGPU 变体便宜。
价格和供应情况
Schenker Vision 14 2023 的起始配置价格为 1549 欧元。.该价格仅适用于欧洲客户;有兴趣的买家应仔细检查(通过价格下方的"含税不含运费"链接)是否可以将货物运至其所在国家,以及可能产生的费用。
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023
- 10/13/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.