联想Yoga 9i 14 G8 2023敞篷车回顾:英特尔猛禽湖让人失望
联想在Yoga 9i 14中提供了一款高端的14英寸敞篷车,现在已经进入第八代。从外观上看,新的Yoga 9i 14 G8仍然忠实于它的前辈,但使用了英特尔猛禽湖一代(第13代)的新移动处理器,即Core i7-1360P。这里评测的是配备2.8K OLED屏幕的机型,但我们去年评测的配备4K OLED的变体也可供选择。我们的测试设备配备512GB SSD存储,目前在美国的联想网站上售价为1,499.99美元;配备4K OLED和1TB SSD存储的机型售价为1,749.99美元。
在以下评论中,我们主要关注新的英特尔处理器和2.8K OLED面板。关于外壳和输入设备的详细信息,我们参考了去年对Yoga 9i 14 G7的广泛评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.3 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.25 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.8 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.3 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
90.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.20" | 3120x2080 | |
90 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 1.4 kg | 17.4 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
93.4 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry M2 Pro 10-Core, M2 Pro 16-Core GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" | 3024x1964 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例与设备
联想 去年完全重新设计了去年,Yoga 9 14的底盘完全重新设计,所以现在的设计与以前的版本相比主要是更圆。还有一些对比鲜明的元素,如抛光的周围边缘或显示屏铰链,它也容纳了部分音响系统。除了我们测试设备的风暴灰之外,还有一个银色的型号。
尽管采用了16:10的面板,但特别是显示屏的底部边缘仍然非常宽,这对屏占比(78%)和外壳的整体深度都有负面影响。此外,当笔记本电脑折叠时,箱子的两半并不完全平齐。
做工和稳定性都非常好,我们在此没有批评意见。特别是中央铰链调整得非常好,将相对较大的盖子非常牢固地固定在位置上。指纹和污垢对哑光金属表面来说其实并不是什么问题。在端口、WLAN模块和网络摄像头方面,与2022年的机型相比没有任何变化。
Networking | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
维护
进入Yoga 9 14的内部仍然是不必要的复杂,在后部橡胶脚下有三个小螺丝,是用胶水粘住的。一旦底盖被拆下,两个风扇可以被清洁,M.2 2280固态硬盘也可以被更换。
输入设备 -Precision 笔2包括在内
我们还参考了我们对前代产品输入设备,因为这里没有任何区别。键程相对较短,但键盘仍然提供精确和清晰的反馈,因此总体上有非常好的打字感觉。此外,键盘背光可以通过传感器激活,效果也不错。然而,你必须习惯于右侧的额外栏目。
点击板的工作无懈可击,但点击的声音听起来仍然非常响亮和廉价。Yoga 9i 14还默认配备了联想Precision Pen 2,该笔不能收进机箱,但提供了普通笔的人体工程学设计,总体来说效果非常好。
显示屏 - 2.8K OLED,90 Hz
联想为Yoga 9 14提供两种不同的光面OLED触摸屏。我们在2022年型号中测试的4K OLED触摸屏仍然可以选择,但默认安装的是2.8K OLED触摸屏。根据规格表,这提供了2,880 x 1,800的稍低分辨率,但频率较高,为90赫兹。这在移动图像的情况下效果很好,但2.8K OLED也显示摩尔纹效果,即轻微的网格(在子像素图像上不可见)。这在明亮的表面和短距离的坐姿上特别明显。在正常的坐姿距离下,这不应该是一个问题,但如果你想避免这种现象,为了安全起见,你应该为4K面板支付250美元的附加费。
这两块面板的核心值是相当的,因为我们确定SDR的最大亮度约为380cd/m²,在HDR模式下最大约为570cd/m²,但Windows的HDR实现仍需改进。HDR模式必须在设置中手动激活,然后色彩管理也不再起作用。正如预期的那样,黑电平极低,导致对比度非常高。背光出血在OLED面板中并不存在,但频率为360赫兹的PWM会从86%或更低的亮度开始启动。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 378 cd/m²
Contrast: 12600:1 (Black: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.9
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti MNE007ZA1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2" | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P LEN140WQUXGA, OLED, 3840x2400, 14" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -17% | -6% | -0% | -0% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 74.1 -26% | 94.6 -5% | 99.9 0% | 98.7 -1% | 99.2 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 97.4 -3% | 99.5 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.3 | 75.3 -23% | 86.5 -12% | 97.2 -1% | 98.5 0% | |
Response Times | -2178% | -2021% | -0% | -133% | -644% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.04 ? | 31.5 ? -2929% | 25.4 ? -2342% | 1 ? 4% | 2.8 ? -169% | 35.2 ? -3285% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.95 ? | 14.5 ? -1426% | 17.1 ? -1700% | 1 ? -5% | 2.8 ? -195% | 26.4 ? -2679% |
PWM Frequency | 360 ? | 360 ? 0% | 239.2 ? -34% | 14880 ? 4033% | ||
Screen | -121% | -113% | -14% | 352% | 37% | |
Brightness middle | 378 | 421 11% | 603 60% | 386 2% | 361 -4% | 500 32% |
Brightness | 379 | 416 10% | 586 55% | 389 3% | 362 -4% | 489 29% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 89 -9% | 91 -7% | 98 0% | 98 0% | 94 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.03 | 0.28 -833% | 0.39 -1200% | 0.05 -67% | 0.001 97% | 0.02 33% |
Contrast | 12600 | 1504 -88% | 1546 -88% | 7720 -39% | 361000 2765% | 25000 98% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 3.2 -28% | 1.1 56% | 2.6 -4% | 2.8 -12% | 1.2 52% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.7 | 5.5 -17% | 2.2 53% | 4.8 -2% | 5.8 -23% | 2.6 45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.9 | 2 -5% | 1.2 37% | 1.8 5% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 4.4 -132% | 1.5 21% | 2.3 -21% | 1.9 -0% | 1.7 11% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.22 99% | 2.17 101% | 2.21 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 6222 104% | 6384 102% | 6549 99% | 6121 106% | 6181 105% | 6791 96% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -772% /
-393% | -713% /
-362% | -5% /
-8% | 73% /
173% | -203% /
-136% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)对显示器进行了测量,在出厂状态下,画质已经很不错了,尤其是在灰阶方面。没有看到偏色;只有色温略微过暖。然而,在颜色上有一些偏差,我们无法明显改善,即使是用我们自己的校准。与4K面板一样,尽管色彩空间覆盖率很高,但Yoga 9 14因此不适合用于图像/视频编辑。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.95 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.48 ms rise | |
↘ 0.47 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.57 ms rise | |
↘ 0.57 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 360 Hz | ≤ 86 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 86 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
高反射的触摸屏在户外是有问题的。OLED面板的高对比度有帮助,但反射很快就成为一个问题。在可视角度的稳定性方面,基本上没有限制,但在某些角度可以看到轻微的蓝色偏光,这是OLED屏幕的典型特征。
性能 - 英特尔猛禽湖
新的Yoga 9i 14 G8目前只提供了新的英特尔酷睿i7-1360P和16GB LPDDR5-5200内存。只有硬盘容量有不同选择,即512GB和1TB。
测试条件
除了Windows中的性能设置外,预装的联想Vantage应用程序提供了三种不同的配置文件(电池保护器、智能冷却和高性能),可以在应用程序中或通过Fn+Q组合键选择。我们使用高性能 模式进行了以下基准测试和测量。
处理器 - 酷睿i7-1360P
与新的移动HX CPU相比,猛禽湖一代的U和P系列与旧的Alder Lake型号相比没有什么变化。除了最高时钟略高之外,新的酷睿i7-1360P也对应于旧的酷睿i7-1260P(4个性能核心和8个效率核心),我们已经在我们的 广泛的分析.在Yoga 9i 14 G8中(正如在 前身在Yoga 9i 14 G8中(和前代产品一样),在短时间内运行的功率高达64瓦,而持续运行的功率高达38瓦,这就是为什么我们在这里也有一个直接的比较。因此,Yoga 9i 14应该再次成为今年最快的猛禽湖P笔记本之一,而且我们还看到比Core i7-1260P领先8%。 酷睿i7-1260P在我们所有的CPU基准测试中,我们还看到比旧版Yoga 9i 14的Core i7-1260P领先8%。然而,这也意味着,新的猛禽湖只是刚刚领先于旧的 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U和小型 Apple M2 Pro(10个核心)例如,在Cinebench R23 Multi中,而拥有12个核心的M2 Pro则明显更快。只有在单核测试中,英特尔仍有优势,但我们稍后会讨论效率问题。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
在我们的Cinebench R15多循环中,新的Raptor-Lake移动处理器的优势很快就消失了,它只比采用Alder-Lake芯片的老款Yoga 9i 14非常轻微地领先。至少在电池模式下性能保持稳定。
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro -6! | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry -5! | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average of class Convertible |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (6390 - 12637, n=16) | |
Average of class Convertible (616 - 18698, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1596 - 1909, n=16) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average of class Convertible (308 - 1980, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (2474 - 4887, n=16) | |
Average of class Convertible (242 - 7303, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (611 - 736, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 781, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1079 - 2214, n=16) | |
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (180 - 271, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 302, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average of class Convertible (175 - 1059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (268 - 496, n=17) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (26534 - 52959, n=16) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (4647 - 5973, n=16) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (7549 - 10817, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1435 - 1871, n=17) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average of class Convertible (319 - 2062, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (6.9 - 14.2, n=16) | |
Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 22.4, n=62, last 2 years) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (40.3 - 57.2, n=16) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (0.445 - 0.583, n=16) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
* ... smaller is better
我们还看了一下新猛禽湖酷睿i7-1360P的效率,据此,为了消除内部显示器的影响,我们用外部显示器进行了测量。由于我们已经看到,酷睿i7-1360P提供的性能略高于 酷睿i7-1260P在旧版Yoga 9i 14中,在相同的功率限制下,效率也略有提高,在单核和多核测试中都是如此。然而,英特尔仍然明显落后于去年的 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U以及Apple's current M2 Pro芯片。
Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (468 - 29594, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (5610 - 11188, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Convertible (2644 - 114033, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (29251 - 56942, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (182 - 4841, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (1444 - 2728, n=16) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (65324 - 89266, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average of class Convertible (10502 - 120368, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Convertible (659 - 16315, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (4370 - 7269, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Convertible (1420 - 61249, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (14104 - 28019, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (30391 - 99244, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (1279 - 169089, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (61.4 - 1243, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (420 - 807, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (254 - 16065, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (2906 - 5957, n=16) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (29108 - 49328, n=16) | |
Average of class Convertible (5136 - 53406, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
系统性能
正如预期的那样,新的Yoga 9i 14 G8是一台反应非常迅速的笔记本电脑,所有的输入都在实践中实现,没有重大的延迟或挂起。合成基准测试结果也非常好,测试期间没有出现任何问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average of class Convertible (1486 - 7963, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5360 - 6281, n=14) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9883 - 12059, n=14) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average of class Convertible (3975 - 12059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Convertible (2764 - 10800, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6572 - 8161, n=14) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (811 - 12360, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5723 - 7612, n=14) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1527 - 1891, n=15) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (310 - 1912, n=60, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1503 - 1842, n=15) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average of class Convertible (389 - 1790, n=60, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1558 - 2003, n=15) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (252 - 2183, n=60, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1311 - 1899, n=15) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (295 - 1868, n=60, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 Score | 6195 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (16353 - 108544, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (44299 - 72748, n=16) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (44751 - 68945, n=16) | |
Average of class Convertible (12706 - 125359, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (45887 - 93331, n=16) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (10177 - 117920, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average of class Convertible (7.4 - 173, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1360P (85 - 110.5, n=16) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
在我们的标准化延迟测试中(网页浏览、YouTube 4K播放、CPU负载),测试设备显示了目前BIOS版本的局限性,因此不适合无限制地使用实时音频应用程序。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
联想再次为目前的Yoga 9i 14配备了快速的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘,在我们的案例中,使用了存储容量为512GB的SKhynix PC801。传输速率总体上非常好,最重要的是,该驱动器可以在长时间的负载下轻松保持其性能。在首次启动后,用户有420GB的容量可供支配。更多的SSD基准测试可在这里.
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
谈到集成显卡,新的Raptor Lake移动处理器令人失望,因为它们仍然使用众所周知的Iris Xe Graphics G7的96个EUs。,这一点我们已经从旧的Tiger Lake 处理器中熟悉了。最大时钟略有增加,但在合成基准测试中比老款Yoga 9i 14中的Core i7-1260P的领先优势可以忽略不计,只有1%。在这方面,英特尔既无法跟上集成的 AMD的Radeon 680MApple但Xe Graphics G7仍足以满足日常使用,播放高分辨率视频也没有问题,但AMD的新iGPU计划在未来几个月内发布。
Xe Graphics G7在游戏方面也明显落后于集成的Radeon 680M,在许多游戏中不可能有超过中等程度的细节。目前要求很高的游戏(如《赛博朋克2077》)用英特尔GPU几乎无法玩。至少GPU性能在恒定负载和电池电量下都保持稳定。更多的GPU基准测试被列在 我们的技术部分.
3DMark 11 Performance | 7946 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5283 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2046 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (336 - 1259, n=101) | |
Average of class Convertible (269 - 2067, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
Average of class Convertible (607 - 880, n=6, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Convertible (23 - 31, n=3, last 2 years) |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Convertible (37 - 142, n=4, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (10 - 123.3, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (7.07 - 114.3, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (4.48 - 107.1, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (10.8 - 196.9, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 | |
Average of class Convertible (5.4 - 158.3, n=63, last 2 years) |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 118 | 101.8 | 25.1 | 10.7 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 108 | 65 | 37 | 14.8 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 124.3 | 91.1 | 68.9 | 62.7 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 46.4 | 24.8 | 24.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 59.2 | 44.1 | 38.6 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 58 | 33 | 30 | 28 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 102.3 | 43.7 | 35 | 28.3 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 113.6 | 56.5 | 44.7 | 30.8 |
F1 22 (2022) | 50.9 | 46.1 | 33.7 | 25.7 |
排放和能源管理
噪声
在日常使用中,风扇经常处于静止状态,但即使是低的CPU负载也会迅速导致两个风扇启动,特别是在高性能 模式下。由于高功率限制,处理器变得非常热,非常快,这时当然要进行冷却。这在实践中很快就会变得很烦人,所以如果你不需要完全的性能,你应该使用一个较弱的性能配置文件来完成简单的任务。在较高的负载下,两个风扇也很快达到了45 dB(A)的最大值,从性能水平来看,这简直是太吵了。没有发现其他电子噪音,如线圈啸叫。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.6 / 23.6 / 24.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 45 / 45 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.6 dB(A) |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT1T02 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -5% | 7% | -2% | 7% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 23.6 | 24.4 -3% | 23.5 -0% | 24.5 -4% | 23.6 -0% | 24.1 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.6 | 24.4 -3% | 23.5 -0% | 24.5 -4% | 23.6 -0% | 24.1 -2% |
Idle Average * | 23.6 | 24.4 -3% | 23.5 -0% | 24.5 -4% | 23.6 -0% | 24.1 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.6 | 27.8 -13% | 25.9 -5% | 28.1 -14% | 23.6 4% | 30 -22% |
Load Average * | 45 | 43.3 4% | 33.8 25% | 42.8 5% | 24.2 46% | 39.4 12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 45 | 48.2 -7% | 35.4 21% | 42.8 5% | 39.4 12% | |
Load Maximum * | 45 | 48.8 -8% | 40.6 10% | 42.8 5% | 47.5 -6% | 39.4 12% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在日常使用中,Yoga 9i 14的金属底盘几乎不发热,即使在负载下,表面温度也不会出现问题。键盘在负载下仍然相当舒适,可以无限制地打字。热点位于底部的后部中央区域,处理器也位于那里。在压力测试中,我们在这里测得的最高温度为45℃,所以你可以把敞篷车放在你的大腿上而不必担心。
在压力测试中,功耗从最大的64瓦迅速下降到30-36瓦,尽管随着测试的进行,功耗会周期性地波动。压力测试后的性能没有下降。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.4 °C / 77.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+2.6 °C / 4.7 F).
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -17% | -7% | -3% | 5% | -12% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39.7 | 48.4 -22% | 43.1 -9% | 42.3 -7% | 47 -18% | 47.5 -20% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45.4 | 57.1 -26% | 42 7% | 45.4 -0% | 42.8 6% | 52.2 -15% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25.7 | 28.1 -9% | 29.4 -14% | 26.2 -2% | 22.3 13% | 27.1 -5% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.4 | 29 -10% | 29.4 -11% | 26.6 -1% | 21.7 18% | 28.5 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
安装的音响系统(基座前面的2个低音单元和显示器铰链中的2个高音单元)产生了非常好的、充满房间的声音,并与华为平板电脑相媲美。华为MateBook X Pro以及 Apple MacBook Pro 14可以用预装的杜比软件选择不同的配置文件,设置也可以手动调整。
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
消耗功率
我们的测试设备采用2.8K OLED触摸屏,空闲时的功耗比前代产品的4K变体略低,但两者从根本上说处于同一水平。由于相同的功率限制,这也适用于负载下的消耗值。联想再次为这台敞篷车提供了一个100瓦的电源,这在这种情况下也是必要的。我们在压力测试开始时观察到最大96瓦,很快就在60瓦左右趋于平稳。因此,在这种情况下,仍有为电池充电的空间。
Off / Standby | 0.36 / 0.53 Watt |
Idle | 7.8 / 9.3 / 9.8 Watt |
Load |
62.8 / 96 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT1T02 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -29% | -16% | 18% | 10% | -3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.8 | 7.5 4% | 6.5 17% | 5.1 35% | 2.5 68% | 7.1 9% |
Idle Average * | 9.3 | 10.4 -12% | 13.7 -47% | 8.2 12% | 12.1 -30% | 10 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.8 | 11.4 -16% | 14.4 -47% | 8.7 11% | 12.3 -26% | 10.8 -10% |
Load Average * | 62.8 | 83.3 -33% | 64.6 -3% | 51.4 18% | 49.8 21% | 64 -2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.5 | 92.7 -99% | 57.2 -23% | 46.3 -0% | 46.6 -0% | 47.7 -3% |
Load Maximum * | 96 | 110.3 -15% | 90.9 5% | 64.8 32% | 71.4 26% | 97 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress Testing
Power Consumption with an External Monitor
电池寿命
只要你拔掉电源,设备就会默认切换回60赫兹(可以在设置中停用)。然而,2.8K屏幕在调整亮度为150cd/m²(相当于我们测试设备中最大SDR亮度的71%)时,似乎没有4K版本那么有效,因为Yoga 9i 14 2022的电池运行时间更长。在WLAN测试中,我们为新机型记录了略低于8小时的时间(90赫兹模式下约7:20小时),全亮度下略高于6小时(90赫兹模式下约5:30小时)。视频测试的结果是,在60赫兹和150cd/m²条件下,刚刚超过11小时。
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2022 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 71 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry M2 Pro 10-Core, M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, 70 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 28% | -4% | 26% | 58% | 16% | 28% | |
H.264 | 651 | 666 2% | 455 -30% | 762 17% | 982 51% | 758 16% | 770 ? 18% |
WiFi v1.3 | 472 | 607 29% | 451 -4% | 584 24% | 774 64% | 517 10% | 599 ? 27% |
Load | 81 | 124 53% | 100 23% | 110 36% | 98 21% | 113.1 ? 40% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 带有4K OLED的Yoga 9i 14是更好的选择
我们对新的联想Yoga 9i 14 G8的评价有分歧,因为它也是第一台采用新的英特尔猛禽湖P系列移动处理器的设备,即 酷睿i7-1360P.它的CPU性能比它的直接前辈略好(在我们的CPU基准测试中平均多出8%的性能),但集成显卡没有变化,因此新处理器总体上有些令人失望。此外,功率限制仍然很高,这也导致了更大的风扇活动。
另一方面,CPU性能仍然很好,是一个反应非常灵敏的设备。众所周知的优势 前代产品(优秀的外壳质量、良好的键盘、出色的扬声器)保持不变。然而,鉴于价格昂贵,我们建议采用4K OLED触摸屏,我们也在去年的机型中测试过这种触摸屏。 去年的型号.它提供了更好的主观图像质量,并且在我们的电池测试中略微更经济。2.8K OLED绝非不好,但它确实产生了轻微的网格效应(即摩尔纹),这在明亮的表面上特别明显。这一点的烦扰程度取决于你的主观感受,实际上在离屏幕正常的坐姿距离上不应该是太大的问题。两款机型的HDR能力相当,但Windows对HDR的实现仍有很多不足之处。
虽然新的Yoga 9i 14 2023提供了全新的英特尔猛禽湖酷睿i7-1360P,而且总体上是一款非常好的可折叠机,但与前一型号相比,性能提升不大,所以没有理由升级。相反,我们建议有兴趣的买家去买2022年的机型,它有阿尔德湖处理器和4K OLED。
除了新的处理器之外,没有任何真正的变化,这就是为什么我们强烈建议如果你真的感兴趣的话,购买带有Alder Lake处理器的老款机型。新的AMD移动处理器离我们还很远,而且也没有多少配备AMD硬件的高端敞篷车。另一个选择是 联想瑜伽7 14配有 Ryzen 7 6800U但你无法绕过2.8K屏幕。一个强大的笔记本替代品是华为MateBook X Pro 2022,它拥有出色的IPS显示屏(无PWM)。 华为MateBook X Pro 2022,它还提供了一个好的键盘和伟大的扬声器。如果你需要更多的性能,也喜欢玩游戏,你也应该看看 Schenker Vision 14,它的专用GeForce RTX 3050 Ti.对于更好的HDR功能,目前没有什么比 Apple MacBook Pro 14配备迷你LED屏幕。
价格和可用性
建议有兴趣的买家直接通过联想的网站(如适用)查询供货情况。例如,在美国,较便宜的型号(512GB,2.8K(2880 x 1800))售价为1499.99美元,而较贵的1TB和4K(3840 x 2400)型号售价为1749.99美元。
价格截止到2023年3月24日,可能会有变化。
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8
- 03/23/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.