申克 Vision 14 M23 评测--配备GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 的镁合金超极本
我们已经测试过目前申克 Vision 14 的 iGPU 版本,所以现在要评测的只剩下使用GeForce RTX 3050(刷新,6 GB VRAM)取代GeForce RTX 3050 Ti(4 GB VRAM)的型号。但这真的是升级吗?与现在主要使用新版GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑的竞争对手相比,差距有多大?我们的测试设备配备了酷睿 i7-13700H、GeForce RTX 3050、32 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘和雾面 3K IPS 显示屏,价格约为 2200 美元。
与我们之前测试过的 iGPU 版本相比,它在机箱、连接、输入设备、屏幕和扬声器等许多方面都没有任何差异。因此,在本次评测中,我们将重点关注这款笔记本电脑的性能以及专用 GPU 对其排放的影响。欲了解更多信息,请访问我们的Vision 14 M23 iGPU 评测 。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.2 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | 1.3 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.8 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 17.6 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
90.2 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Acer Swift X SFX14-71G i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.50" | 2880x1800 | |
85.6 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.4 kg | 18.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.4 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
与 iGPU 型号的区别
我们目前测试的设备是 Vision 14 的黑色版本,其外壳(镁合金)与之前测试的 iGPU 型号完全相同。 之前测试的 iGPU 型号完全相同。主观而言,我们更喜欢银色版本,因为它更不容易沾染灰尘和指纹。在机身内部,冷却系统也有所改动,当然还安装了专用的 Nvidia GPU。因此,它的重量增加了约 80 克,总重约为 1.35 千克。此外,dGPU 版本配备了功率更大的 150 瓦电源,实际上比 120 瓦版本更紧凑、更轻巧。
与竞争对手相比,Vision 14 dGPU 仍然是最紧凑、最轻便的设备,此外,由于它有两个内存插槽,因此在连接和维护选项方面具有很多优势。
性能 - Raptor Lake 和 RTX 3050
测试条件
预装的控制中心提供两个配置文件--安静和性能,其中 性能配置文件有两个子配置文件,即均衡和发烧。我们在下表中总结了这些配置文件的效果。如果你的目标是最大限度地提高 GPU 性能,那么你应该使用性能/发烧配置文件,我们在下面的基准测试和测量中就是这样做的。在较简单的任务中,您也可以轻松使用 "安静"配置文件。
配置文件 | CPU 负载 | CB R23 Multi | GPU 负载 | Time Spy 图形 | W3 Ultra | 最大风扇噪音排放 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
静音 | 15 瓦 | 5,509 分 | 35 瓦 | 3,811 分 | 36.7 fps | 35.7 dB(A) |
性能 (平衡型) |
45 瓦 | 12,692 分 | 35 瓦 | 3,814 分 | 37.2 fps | 46.9 dB(A) |
性能 (发烧级) |
45 瓦 | 13,401 分 | 50 瓦 | 4,501 分 | 43.7 fps | 49.1 dB(A) |
处理器 - 酷睿 i7-13700H
酷睿 i7-13700H 酷睿 i7-13700H(Raptor Lake)共有 14 个内核(6 个性能内核、8 个效率内核),可同时处理 20 个线程。在当前版本的 Vision 14 中,处理器在短时间内的最大功耗为 45 瓦,随后降至 40 瓦。总的来说,这比前一代的 前代相比,功耗限制为 60/40 瓦。因此,配备 酷睿 i7-12700H的旧机型在多核负载的最初几分钟内速度稍快,但总的来说,这被其较差的单核性能所抵消。这使得它的性能总体上还不错,但我们希望能再好一些。在电池使用情况下,该处理器的最大功耗为 36 瓦,导致其多核性能降低约 15%。更多的 CPU 基准测试可 技术部分。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average of class Subnotebook |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (5890 - 20034, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=63, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1323 - 1914, n=28) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=63, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2322 - 7674, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=59, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (508 - 741, n=28) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=59, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (905 - 2982, n=28) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=65, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (213 - 278, n=28) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (169 - 555, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (27322 - 76344, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=56, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4825 - 6238, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6165 - 14215, n=28) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1362 - 1919, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6.72 - 21.2, n=28) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=58, last 2 years) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=57, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (31.3 - 62.4, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (0.4308 - 0.607, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4986 - 18908, n=28) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (25360 - 92359, n=28) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1339 - 4224, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (68763 - 107159, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4800 - 11050, n=28) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12321 - 45118, n=28) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (28769 - 151254, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (389 - 1215, n=28) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2540 - 10135, n=28) | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12872 - 52727, n=28) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
系统性能
主观上,Vision 14 表现出了出色的性能,在合成基准测试中,它没有表现出任何问题--尽管配备 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑的竞争对手大多表现得更好。另一方面,在日常使用中,你可能不会注意到这些差异。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (6290 - 6597, n=2) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=50, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (9943 - 10112, n=2) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (8803 - 8950, n=2) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=50, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (7590 - 8752, n=2) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=50, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (1504 - 1752, n=2) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=56, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (1417 - 1657, n=2) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=56, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (1711 - 1970, n=2) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=56, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (1220 - 1458, n=2) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (286 - 300, n=2) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (273 - 325, n=2) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=56, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (490 - 496, n=2) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6290 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=58, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (24334 - 78081, n=28) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (23681 - 79656, n=28) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 117898, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (22986 - 99898, n=28) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (82.4 - 136.8, n=28) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试(网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时显示出轻微的限制。此外,在视频播放过程中还出现了许多跳帧现象(3,683 帧中有 111 帧跳帧)。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们测试的 Vision 14 配备了 1-TB 版本的三星 990 Pro。PCIe-4.0 固态硬盘的传输速率非常高,而且在长时间负载的情况下仍能保持稳定的性能。总的来说,它的性能略逊于 iGPU 版本稍差、虽然在日常使用中不会受到任何限制。首次启动设备后,有 873 GB 的空间可供自由使用。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
申克更换了 RTX 3050 Ti(4 GB)换成了 RTX 3050刷新版,配备 6GB VRAM。这是一个相当大的惊喜,因为按照逻辑,它肯定会换成新的 RTX 4050 Laptop(这也是其竞争对手的做法)。得益于额外的 RAM,该 GPU 在更高分辨率方面具有优势,但在合成基准测试中,其性能实际上略逊于旧版 RTX 3050 Ti。尽管它的 TGP 达到了 50 瓦。根据 TGP 的不同,新的 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑要快得多(33%-87%)。
在游戏基准测试中,我们的发现得到了证实,在 1080p 和最大细节的标准化测试中,RTX 3050 6 GB 再次略低于旧版 RTX 3050 Ti。RTX-4050笔记本电脑的竞争对手都做得更好,使它们更具有未来性。在目前的游戏中,如《赛博朋克 2077》,要想流畅地玩游戏,就必须在 1080p 下做到没有最大细节。
在永久负载下,其图形性能至少保持稳定。在电池模式下,GPU 的最大功耗为 35 瓦,性能下降了 17%。更多 GPU 基准测试,请访问移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 。
3DMark 11 Performance | 15844 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10765 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4933 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (68 - 72, n=3) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (107 - 115, n=3) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=60, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (384 - 434, n=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 |
* ... smaller is better
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Acer Swift X SFX14-71G | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=55, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 178.2 | 172.6 | 95.3 | 53 | 36.5 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 187 | 118 | 71 | 43.7 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 152.8 | 137.8 | 112.6 | 99.5 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 111.6 | 59.9 | 44.2 | 32 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 144.7 | 116.2 | 97.1 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 132 | 76 | 70 | 65 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 210 | 96.5 | 80.9 | 70.7 | |
F1 2021 (2021) | 218 | 127.4 | 104.8 | 61.9 | 40 |
F1 22 (2022) | 110.9 | 106.1 | 85.5 | 30.7 | 18.1 |
F1 23 (2023) | 113.9 | 109 | 86.9 | 20.5 | 10.6 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 55.2 | 43.7 | 36.6 | 31.4 |
排放与动力
噪音排放
笔记本电脑风扇的噪音排放和活动取决于您使用的能源配置文件。如果您使用的是性能配置文件,那么即使在执行简单的任务时,您也会发现风扇在呼呼作响。因此,我们建议在日常使用时使用 "安静"配置文件。检查游戏时的性能也很有意义,因为许多游戏主要依靠 GPU。在负载情况下和运行游戏时,声音会变得相当大--我们测得约为 49 dB(A)。在使用两种较弱的模式时,我们测得最大噪音为 46.9 dB(A)(性能/平衡)和 35.7 dB(A)(安静)。我们没有注意到任何额外的电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.5 / 23.5 / 26 dB(A) |
Load |
| 43.6 / 49.1 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.5 dB(A) |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Acer Swift X SFX14-71G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -6% | -11% | -0% | -5% | -2% | 0% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 23.5 | 24.8 -6% | 24.8 -6% | 21.46 9% | 24 -2% | 24.4 -4% | 24.5 -4% | 22.9 3% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.5 | 24.8 -6% | 28.2 -20% | 22.08 6% | 24 -2% | 24.4 -4% | 24.5 -4% | 22.9 3% |
Idle Average * | 23.5 | 24.8 -6% | 31.8 -35% | 22.08 6% | 24 -2% | 24.4 -4% | 24.5 -4% | 22.9 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 26 | 24.8 5% | 31.8 -22% | 22.08 15% | 35.71 -37% | 27.8 -7% | 30.4 -17% | 36.8 -42% |
Load Average * | 43.6 | 47.4 -9% | 38.2 12% | 52.98 -22% | 43.3 1% | 39.5 9% | 43.7 -0% | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.7 | 52.9 -9% | 50 -3% | 52.7 -8% | 40.22 17% | 48.2 1% | 41.7 14% | 46.2 5% |
Load Maximum * | 49.1 | 52.9 -8% | 52.2 -6% | 52.67 -7% | 51.93 -6% | 48.8 1% | 44.9 9% | 46.2 6% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在低负载情况下,Vision 14 的表面温度完全正常,但一旦对组件提出更高的要求,散热就会接近极限。我们在底座顶部测得的温度超过 45 °C,底部中间测得的温度超过 50 °C。此时,应避免将设备放在大腿上。
在压力测试中,显卡更受青睐,因为它一直以 50 瓦的最大功率运行。而处理器则以 45 瓦开始测试,然后立即平衡到 35 瓦。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.5 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.8 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.3 °C / 79.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+2 °C / 3.6 F).
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9-14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Acer Swift X SFX14-71G Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Asus VivoBook 14X K3405 Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 0% | 4% | -16% | 5% | -4% | 7% | 3% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 48.5 | 41 15% | 46.4 4% | 49.2 -1% | 42 13% | 48.4 -0% | 45.8 6% | 41.6 14% |
Maximum Bottom * | 52.8 | 56.7 -7% | 49 7% | 54 -2% | 52 2% | 57.1 -8% | 42 20% | 55.7 -5% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.6 | 27.4 1% | 26.5 4% | 33.6 -22% | 26 6% | 28.1 -2% | 27.5 -0% | 25.9 6% |
Idle Bottom * | 27 | 29.1 -8% | 26.6 1% | 37.6 -39% | 27 -0% | 29 -7% | 27.1 -0% | 28 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
耗电量
测试设备的闲置功耗略高于 iGPU 版本但总的来说,两者的差距并不大。在压力测试中,Vision 14 的最大功耗为 121 瓦,然后很快平衡到 110 瓦,并保持在这一水平。因此,所提供的 150 瓦电源足够大,甚至还有一点回旋余地,可以在苛刻条件下为电池充电--如果需要的话。
Off / Standby | 0.53 / 0.78 Watt |
Idle | 5.2 / 7.8 / 9 Watt |
Load |
78.6 / 121.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
由于空闲消耗较高,其运行时间略低于 iGPU 版本相比 Vision 14(配备 RTX 3050 Ti相比,运行时间有所改善。在 WLAN 测试中,测试设备使用 99 瓦时电池,在 150 cd/m²(测试样本最大亮度的 35%)的适应亮度条件下实现了 12 小时的良好运行时间,即使在全亮度条件下,也能达到 09:40 小时。这些结果使 Vision 14 在同类设备中脱颖而出。
Pros
Cons
评语 - 申克 Vision 14 落后于竞争对手
全球国际货运代理 2022 型号的申克 Vision 14特别是它的英特尔-H45 处理器与 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 T--全部安装在一个小巧的机箱内,是一个极其出色的组合。其高品质的机箱、丰富的连接选项、良好的维护选项(两个内存插槽如今尤其值得称赞)、高分辨率显示屏以及超长的运行时间都是值得一提的积极方面。
不过,2023 型号现在已经开始慢慢显出老态。由于功耗限制降低,猛禽湖处理器 酷睿 i7-13700H甚至比前代 Alder-Lake 处理器还要稍慢一些,此外,其配备 6GB VRAM 的 "新 "GeForce RTX 3050 与配备 4GB VRAM 的旧GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 完全处于同一水平。最大的问题是,其多媒体竞争对手已经继续转向新的GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑,后者只是提供了更高的图形性能。
Vision 14 M23 在图形性能方面落后于竞争对手,因为它的GeForce RTX 3050 6GB 笔记本电脑跟不上新的GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑。
就其本身而言,配备 RTX 3050 Refresh 的 Vision 14 仍然是一款非常出色的子笔记本电脑,尤其是由于其良好的维护选项,它可以在竞争中脱颖而出。遗憾的是,竞争对手的性能更胜一筹,如果你正在寻找一款配备专用 GPU 的紧凑型子笔记本/多媒体笔记本,那么你最好选择这些设备中的一款。它最大的竞争对手可能是 Yoga Pro 7 14它配备了酷睿 i7-13700H、RTX 4050 笔记本电脑和刷新率为 120Hz 的 3K IPS 显示屏。它的价格也略低,但电池续航时间没有那么好,内存(16 GB)也无法扩展。
价格和供应情况
全球国际货运代理 Vision 14 M23 可通过Bestware 进行配置。配置,价格约为 1,500 美元起。
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050
- 01/11/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.