Notebookcheck Logo

XMG Fusion 15(提前 24 天)评测:专为游戏玩家和创作者打造的紧凑型 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑

动力室。

轻巧、紧凑的 XMG Fusion 15 没有采用传统的屏幕尺寸:它没有采用 16 英寸或 15.6 英寸显示屏,而是配备了 16:10 宽高比的 15.3 英寸面板(2560 x 1600 像素,240 Hz)。酷睿 i9 处理器、RTX 4070、Thunderbolt 4 和非常出色的运行时间为其提供了全面的配置。
Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Nvidia Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Windows

XMG Fusion 15(早期 24)是一款面向游戏玩家和创作者的 15.3 英寸笔记本电脑,基于同方的裸机(GM5IX7A)。Raptor Lake、Ada Lovelace 和 32 GB 内存为这款笔记本电脑提供了流媒体、渲染和游戏功能。目前这款产品的售价约为 2,500 美元。竞争对手包括 Aorus 16X (2024), Alienware m16 R2, HP Omen Transcend 16联想Legion Pro 5 16IRX9.

SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (XMG Fusion 15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 170 W PL2 / Short Burst, 160 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2175 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.5222, Optimus + MUX-Switch
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Display
15.30 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 197 PPI, BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1, IPS, sRGB, glossy: no, 240 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 894 GB free
Soundcard
Conexant SN6140
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Audiokombo, Card Reader: SD, SDXC, SDHC, TPM 2.0
Networking
Motorcomm YT6801 (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 21.9 x 342.5 x 245
Battery
99.8 Wh, 6450 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, USB Thundrive (drivers, manuals), stickers, mousepad, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.13 kg, Power Supply: 864 g
Price
2293 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
88.9 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg21.9 mm15.30"2560x1600
87.4 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
90.2 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg23.5 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.3 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.95 mm16.00"2560x1600

外壳 - XMG 笔记本电脑配有铝制外壳

申克采用了光滑的哑光黑色铝制外壳,表面光滑。这款笔记本电脑没有任何引人注目的设计元素或 LED 灯带,只有键盘背光(RGB)为设备增添了几分色彩。在专业环境中,这款笔记本电脑几乎不会引人注目。

我们注意到没有任何材料突出,所有缝隙都完全吻合。底座和盖子可以轻微扭动,但这并不奇怪。按压盖子的背面也不会产生任何画面变化。坚硬的铰链允许最大打开角度为 180 度。单手即可打开。

XMG Fusion 15(24 岁出头)
XMG Fusion 15(24 岁出头)
XMG Fusion 15(24 岁出头)
XMG Fusion 15(24 岁出头)
XMG Fusion 15(24 岁出头)
XMG Fusion 15(24 岁出头)
XMG Fusion 15(24 岁出头)
XMG Fusion 15(24 岁出头)
XMG Fusion 15(24 岁出头)
XMG Fusion 15(24 岁出头)
XMG Fusion 15(24 岁出头)
XMG Fusion 15(24 岁出头)
XMG Fusion 15(24 岁出头)

毫不奇怪:在同类产品中,Fusion 是最小巧的设备,显示屏最小。同时,它也是所有设备中最轻巧的。

尺寸比较

363.4 mm 261.75 mm 26.95 mm 2.5 kg363.9 mm 249.4 mm 23.5 mm 2.5 kg356 mm 254 mm 20 mm 2.3 kg356 mm 269 mm 20 mm 2.3 kg342.5 mm 245 mm 21.9 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 配备 Thunderbolt 4 的 Fusion 15

Fusion 配备三个 USB-A 端口(USB 3.2 Gen 1)和两个 USB-C 端口(1 个 USB 3.2 Gen 1、1 个 Thunderbolt 4)。TB4 端口支持 Power Delivery 并可输出 DisplayPort 信号。笔记本电脑总共有两个视频输出接口(1 个 HDMI 接口,1 个 DP 接口)。一个音频插孔和一个千兆以太网端口完善了其连接选项。视频输出和电源连接位于设备背面。相应的电缆将从背面伸出,因此不会碍事。

左侧电缆锁插槽、USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)、USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C)、音频组合
左侧电缆锁插槽、USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)、USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C)、音频组合
右侧SD 读卡器,2 个 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
右侧SD 读卡器,2 个 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
背面雷电 4(USB-C、DisplayPort、Power Delivery)、HDMI、千兆以太网、电源连接
背面雷电 4(USB-C、DisplayPort、Power Delivery)、HDMI、千兆以太网、电源连接

SD 读卡器

SD 读卡器(参考卡:AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)的传输速率为 81 MB/s(传输 250 张 jpg 图像,每张 5 MB)和 82 MB/s(复制大数据块),速度一般。竞争对手大多提供速度更快的读卡器。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
186 MB/s +130%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
81 MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
75.3 MB/s -7%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
205.32 MB/s +150%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
188 MB/s +129%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=87, last 2 years)
120.4 MB/s +47%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
82 MB/s

交流

Fusion 采用了 WiFi 6E 芯片(英特尔 AX211),在最佳情况下(附近没有 WiFi 设备,笔记本电脑和服务器之间距离较近),数据传输率非常高。有线连接由 Motorcomm 公司的千兆以太网控制器(YT6801)负责,这是我们以前从未遇到过的制造商。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1444 (1378min - 1489max) MBit/s
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1411 (1327min - 1472max) MBit/s -2%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (64 - 1921, n=242)
1231 MBit/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=147, last 2 years)
1227 MBit/s -15%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202
1205 (875min - 1438max) MBit/s -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
636 (485min - 769max) MBit/s -56%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
469 (304min - 548max) MBit/s -68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1697 (849min - 1712max) MBit/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1632 (1454min - 1700max) MBit/s
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1577 (1237min - 1665max) MBit/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=147, last 2 years)
1390 MBit/s -15%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=242)
1382 MBit/s -15%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202
1227 (1074min - 1317max) MBit/s -25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1040 (739min - 1218max) MBit/s -36%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1631 (1454-1700)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1576 (1237-1665)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1227 (1074-1317)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1668 (849-1712)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1039 (739-1218)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1444 (1378-1489)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø469 (304-548)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1205 (875-1438)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1411 (1327-1472)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø636 (485-769)

网络摄像头

它的网络摄像头(210 万像素)质量一般。在色彩准确度方面,该机表现不佳:偏差约为 9,未达到目标值(DeltaE<3)。不过,它支持 Windows Hello。此外,它还配有一个机械盖。

ColorChecker
8.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24): 8.97 ∆E min: 2.36 - max: 15.16 ∆E

配件

笔记本电脑随附 U 盘(驱动程序、手册)、贴纸和鼠标垫。

维护

拧下设备底部的所有螺丝后,就可以非常轻松地取下底壳部分--你可能只需要一个拨子弹或一个平铲来协助操作。随后,您可以访问内存组(两个都占用)、固态硬盘(PCIe 4,M.2-2280)、第二个固态硬盘插槽(PCIe 4,M.2-2280)、WLAN 模块、风扇、BIOS 电池和笔记本电池。

硬件 XMG Fusion 15(2024 年初)
硬件 XMG Fusion 15(2024 年初)
硬件 XMG Fusion 15(2024 年初)
硬件 XMG Fusion 15(2024 年初)
硬件 XMG Fusion 15(2024 年初)

保修

该设备的基本保修期为两年,包括取货服务和 6 个月的快速维修服务(48 小时内维修)。您可以付费将保修期延长至 36 个月。

输入设备 - 单键 RGB 背光

键盘

这款 Chiclet 键盘的按键(四级 RGB 背光)键程适中,按压点清晰。按键的阻力可以更小一些,但这是个人喜好的问题。键盘在键入时会有轻微的晃动,但在我们的测试过程中并不令人讨厌。正面:四个方向键不仅大小合适,而且与其他按键分开。

触摸板

多点触摸点击板(约 12.3 x 7.8 厘米)取代了鼠标,光滑的表面便于手指滑动。它的特点是提升距离短,压力点清晰。

键盘 XMG Fusion 15(早期 24)
键盘 XMG Fusion 15(早期 24)

显示屏 - sRGB 覆盖范围的明亮面板

申克为 Fusion 配备了长宽比为 16:10 的 15.3 英寸屏幕(2560 x 1600 像素)。240-Hz 的哑光面板具有自适应同步、无 PWM 闪烁、响应时间短和亮度高的特点。不提供替代显示器。

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
无明显背光出血
无明显背光出血
467
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 491 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 460 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 491 cd/m²
Contrast: 1045:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.14
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
75% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
73.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.204
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3"
Aorus 16X 2024
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Alienware m16 R2
BOE NE16NYH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
BOE NE160QDM-NYC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display
-7%
-3%
22%
-5%
Display P3 Coverage
73.5
67.2
-9%
71
-3%
99.8
36%
69.3
-6%
sRGB Coverage
100
96.7
-3%
100
0%
100
0%
99.4
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
75
69.3
-8%
71.4
-5%
97
29%
70.1
-7%
Response Times
-27%
-41%
96%
-105%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
5 ?(2.3, 2.7)
7.5 ?(3.3, 4.2)
-50%
5.7 ?(2.6, 3.1)
-14%
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
96%
11.9 ?(5.5, 6.4)
-138%
Response Time Black / White *
5.2 ?(1.5, 3.7)
5.4 ?(1.5, 3.9)
-4%
8.7 ?(4.6, 4.1)
-67%
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
96%
8.9 ?(4.8, 4.1)
-71%
PWM Frequency
120 ?(100)
Screen
-1%
11%
182%
17%
Brightness middle
491
542
10%
345.8
-30%
390
-21%
384
-22%
Brightness
460
504
10%
337
-27%
392
-15%
366
-20%
Brightness Distribution
89
86
-3%
87
-2%
98
10%
91
2%
Black Level *
0.47
0.45
4%
0.3
36%
0.02
96%
0.35
26%
Contrast
1045
1204
15%
1153
10%
19500
1766%
1097
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.16
2.73
-26%
1.99
8%
1.94
10%
0.97
55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.44
5.29
-19%
3.52
21%
4.26
4%
3.57
20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.14
1.32
-16%
0.62
46%
4.21
-269%
0.77
32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.3
2.9
12%
2.1
36%
1.5
55%
1.5
55%
Gamma
2.204 100%
2.192 100%
2.32 95%
2.221 99%
2.24 98%
CCT
6286 103%
6173 105%
6369 102%
6395 102%
6709 97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-12% / -6%
-11% / 1%
100% / 135%
-31% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

显示器开箱即显示出良好的色彩显示效果:偏差约为 2.2,达到了目标值(DeltaE < 3)。对显示器进行校准后,偏差降低到 1.14,灰阶色调更加均衡。面板能够完全覆盖 sRGB 色彩空间,但不能覆盖 AdobeRGB 或 DCI P3 色彩空间。这与大多数竞争对手的屏幕并无不同。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
CalMAN:色彩饱和度
CalMAN:色彩饱和度
CalMAN: 色彩检查器
CalMAN: 色彩检查器
CalMAN:灰度(校准)
CalMAN:灰度(校准)
CalMAN: 色彩饱和度(校准)
CalMAN: 色彩饱和度(校准)
CalMAN:色彩校验器(已校准)
CalMAN:色彩校验器(已校准)
XMG Fusion 15 E24 对比 sRGB
XMG Fusion 15 E24 对比 sRGB
XMG Fusion 15 E24 与 AdobeRGB 的对比
XMG Fusion 15 E24 与 AdobeRGB 的对比
XMG Fusion 15 E24 与 DCI-P3 的对比
XMG Fusion 15 E24 与 DCI-P3 的对比

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.5 ms rise
↘ 3.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.3 ms rise
↘ 2.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

该设备的可视角度稳定的 IPS 面板在任何角度都清晰易读。在室外,只要阳光不是太强烈,你就可以阅读显示屏上的内容。

外面的 Fusion。
外面的 Fusion。
Fusion 15(早期 24)的视角
Fusion 15(早期 24)的视角

性能 - Raptor Lake 和 Ada Lovelace 为笔记本电脑提供动力

功能强大、结构紧凑的 XMG Fusion 15(早期 24)面向游戏玩家和创作者。Raptor Lake 和 Ada Lovelace 提供了必要的性能。该笔记本电脑可通过Schenker 在线商店进行个性化配置。.目前的型号价格约为 2,500 美元。更便宜的型号起价约为 1,700 美元。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
英伟达系统信息
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 

测试条件

笔记本电脑提供三种制造商特定的性能模式(见表),可使用单独的按钮(电源按钮旁边)在三种模式之间快速切换。可以使用预装的控制中心软件创建个人配置文件。例如,可以调整 CPU 的功率限制、GPU 的 TGP 和/或设备的温度上限。

我们在测试中使用了 "发烧友"模式(基准测试)和 "平衡"模式(电池测试)。GPU 模式设置为混合(= Optimus)。

发烧友 超增压 平衡
功率限制 1 (HWInfo) 160 瓦 160 瓦 160 瓦
功率限制 2 (HWInfo) 170 瓦 170 瓦 170 瓦
噪音 (Witcher 3) 51 dB(A) 53 dB(A) 39 dB(A)
性能 (Witcher 3) 128 fps 130 fps 14-128 fps
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心

欠压

处理器可以在低于制造商预期电压的情况下运行(欠压)。因此,设备的功耗和热量排放都会降低。但要小心:过度降低电压会导致系统不稳定或出现故障。在这种情况下,必须逆转变化--必须自行承担降压风险。

BIOS XMG Fusion 15
BIOS XMG Fusion 15
BIOS XMG Fusion 15
BIOS XMG Fusion 15

处理器

酷睿 i9-14900HX 酷睿 i9-14900HX(Raptor Lake) 的 24 个 CPU 内核(8P + 16E = 32 个线程)可实现 5.8 GHz (P) 和 4.1 GHz (E) 的最高时钟频率。永久多线程负载(CB15 Loop)可实现稳定的时钟频率--其水平取决于所选的电源模式。

Enthusiast提供的基准值低于 CPU 平均值,而Overboost则大大高于平均值--这主要适用于笔记本电脑的多线程性能。在使用所有三种配置文件时,其单线程性能处于较高且非常接近的水平。

有关酷睿 i9 的更多信息,请参阅我们的分析文章

多线程(与电源连接)
多线程(与电源连接)
单线程(与电源连接)
单线程(与电源连接)

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0230460690920115013801610184020702300253027602990322034503680391041404370Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3246 (3155.57-3458.12)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3877 (3701.99-4280.82)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2777 (2743.86-2839.9)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø2840 (2582.31-3904.72)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4230 (4151.1-4590.84)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX; Overboost: Ø4247 (4169.27-4354.93)
CB15 Loop(爱好者)
CB15 Loop(爱好者)
CB15 循环(超增压)
CB15 循环(超增压)
CB15 回路(平衡)
CB15 回路(平衡)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
86.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
82.7 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
81.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
80.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
74.5 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
70.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
65.5 pt
Alienware m16 R2 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60.2 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
30709 Points +33%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
29686 (26317.7min - 29686max) Points +28%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17078 - 36249, n=38)
28781 Points +24%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27818 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
23124 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)
21994 Points -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
20702 Points -10%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
18419 (18019.3min - 18419.5max) Points -20%
Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
2211 Points +8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2188 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2182 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1720 - 2245, n=39)
2146 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2122 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2043 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)
1894 Points -7%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1749 Points -14%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
11673 Points +38%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11319 Points +34%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6579 - 13832, n=37)
10930 Points +29%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10655 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8465 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8427 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)
8352 Points -1%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7050 Points -17%
CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
844 Points +8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
841 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
836 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (657 - 859, n=37)
824 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
812 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
779 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)
727 Points -7%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
674 Points -13%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4591 (4151.1min - 4590.84max) Points +33%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
4557 Points +32%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 5589, n=38)
4424 Points +28%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4280 Points +24%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3905 (2582.31min - 3904.72max) Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3458 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)
3440 Points -1%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2840 (2743.86min - 2839.9max) Points -18%
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
312 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
312 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (247 - 323, n=37)
305 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
299 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
298 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
287 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)
278 Points -3%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
256 Points -11%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)
169.4 Seconds * -23%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
164 Seconds * -19%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
138 Seconds *
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
126 Seconds * +9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (91 - 206, n=37)
121.2 Seconds * +12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
113 Seconds * +18%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
110 Seconds * +20%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
121665 MIPS +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
115585 MIPS +18%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (66769 - 136645, n=37)
111239 MIPS +14%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
106866 MIPS +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
97929 MIPS
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
88012 MIPS -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)
85738 MIPS -12%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
67581 MIPS -31%
7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7508 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
7409 MIPS -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7297 MIPS -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7142 MIPS -5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (5452 - 7545, n=37)
7021 MIPS -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6776 MIPS -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)
6322 MIPS -16%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5037 MIPS -33%
Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
18126 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost)
18056 Points +11%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
17408 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13158 - 19665, n=37)
17321 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
16196 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
16011 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=112, last 2 years)
14207 Points -12%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
12670 Points -22%
Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
3081 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
3054 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost)
3032 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2419 - 3129, n=37)
2967 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
2889 Points -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
2800 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3129, n=112, last 2 years)
2651 Points -14%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
2383 Points -23%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
21299 Points +24%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
20994 Points +22%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19607 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 23194, n=37)
19449 Points +13%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17612 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17214 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)
15098 Points -12%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12328 Points -28%
Single-Core
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2183 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
2152 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2107 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2210, n=37)
2092 Points -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2053 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2046 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)
1898 Points -10%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1741 Points -17%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
32.4 fps +35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.1 fps +25%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (16.8 - 38.9, n=37)
29.3 fps +22%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27 fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
24 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)
23.6 fps -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
22.7 fps -5%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
21.2 fps -12%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
53.1 s * -37%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.3.4.2)
49.8 s * -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)
48.1 s * -24%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (31.4 - 199, n=37)
47.5 s * -22%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
40.7 s * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
38.9 s *
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
38.5 s * +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2, Overboost)
36.1 s * +7%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.487 sec * -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)
0.4366 sec * -20%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3955 sec * -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3917 sec * -7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=37)
0.385 sec * -5%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3782 sec * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
0.3684 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.365 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3458 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
276 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
287 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
8465 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
779 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
23124 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2043 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1342 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
120.1 Points
Help
Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
99.4 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
88.7 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
80.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
75.2 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67.6 pt
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63.6 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
27412 KRay/s +36%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
25072 KRay/s +24%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13098 - 33474, n=36)
24763 KRay/s +22%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
23082 KRay/s +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)
21963 KRay/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
20224 KRay/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
18470 KRay/s -9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
17244 KRay/s -15%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
137215 Points +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
129169 Points +24%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (67573 - 166040, n=36)
124114 Points +19%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
116836 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)
106952 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
104545 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
92996 Points -11%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
88537 Points -15%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
6905 MB/s +30%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
6285 MB/s +19%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3589 - 7979, n=36)
6130 MB/s +16%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
5723 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
5293 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)
4920 MB/s -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
4267 MB/s -19%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
4242 MB/s -20%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
142503 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
139673 Points +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
139355 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148966, n=36)
138261 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
131076 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
118405 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)
117347 Points -10%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
84180 Points -36%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
15756 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
15401 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (10475 - 18517, n=36)
15241 Points +10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
14830 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13913 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)
13290 Points -4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
12217 Points -12%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
10617 Points -24%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
68400 Points +34%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
62567 Points +22%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (32543 - 83662, n=36)
61081 Points +20%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
57633 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)
53819 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
51088 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
47685 Points -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
43302 Points -15%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
236096 MB/s +24%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
190740 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=36)
139038 MB/s -27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
120213 MB/s -37%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
112833 MB/s -41%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)
109208 MB/s -43%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
86964 MB/s -54%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
82757 MB/s -57%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
1957 MB/s +32%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1866 MB/s +26%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1054 - 2292, n=36)
1791 MB/s +21%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1662 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1485 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)
1369 MB/s -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1265 MB/s -15%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1219 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
14882 KRay/s +35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13776 KRay/s +25%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6809 - 18349, n=36)
13332 KRay/s +21%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
12355 KRay/s +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)
11830 KRay/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
11009 KRay/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
9802 KRay/s -11%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
9170 KRay/s -17%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49676 MPixel/s +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49507 MPixel/s +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49217 MPixel/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
47721 MPixel/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
47411 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (23903 - 54702, n=36)
46878 MPixel/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)
40303 MPixel/s -15%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
39532 MPixel/s -17%

系统性能

运行流畅的系统并不缺乏计算能力。游戏、流媒体和渲染不会给笔记本电脑带来任何重大挑战。内存的传输速率在 DDR5-5600 内存的正常范围内。PCMark 测试结果也不错。

内存以双通道模式运行。
内存以双通道模式运行。
PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8550 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8522 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
8389 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7768 - 8550, n=8)
8193 Points -4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
7866 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)
7813 Points -8%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7761 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11815 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11286 Points -4%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
11071 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10104 - 11815, n=8)
10896 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years)
10836 Points -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10621 Points -10%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10330 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
11103 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10731 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9577 - 11103, n=8)
10431 Points -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10268 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10139 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years)
9909 Points -8%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9422 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
14827 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
13247 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12114 - 14827, n=8)
13160 Points -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
13036 Points -2%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13035 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years)
12168 Points -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
12114 Points -9%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2312 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2203 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2002 - 2312, n=7)
2186 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2002 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=144, last 2 years)
1910 Points -13%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1762 Points -20%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2191 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2109 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1827 - 2191, n=7)
2066 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1827 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=144, last 2 years)
1809 Points -14%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1684 Points -20%
CrossMark / Creativity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2458 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2258 - 2458, n=7)
2363 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2358 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2287 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=144, last 2 years)
2099 Points -11%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1913 Points -19%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2259 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1734 - 2330, n=7)
2056 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2049 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1769 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=144, last 2 years)
1707 Points -17%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1576 Points -23%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
342 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
342 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
330 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
322 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (269 - 342, n=8)
322 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=160, last 2 years)
304 Points -11%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
294 Points -14%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
301 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (291 - 304, n=6)
298 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
291 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.4 - 328, n=149, last 2 years)
268 Points -11%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
257 Points -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
546 ms * -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 674, n=175, last 2 years)
502 ms * -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
449 ms * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (431 - 469, n=8)
448 ms * -4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 ms * -2%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
436 ms * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
431 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
8522 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78979 MB/s +2%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78854 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78330 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77669 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (38028 - 83392, n=36)
75105 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)
65546 MB/s -16%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63008 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86538 MB/s +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86376 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85867 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85070 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43306 - 87568, n=36)
81377 MB/s -5%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76370 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)
69486 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77579 MB/s +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77406 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77346 MB/s +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (37146 - 80589, n=36)
72406 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72287 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)
67309 MB/s -7%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66009 MB/s -9%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.2 ns * -52%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)
93.8 ns * -13%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 ns * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (76.1 - 105, n=36)
84.7 ns * -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.4 ns * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.1 ns *
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.5 ns * +1%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

标准延迟监控测试(网上冲浪、4K 视频播放、Prime95 高负载)发现了一些异常情况。该系统似乎不适合实时视频和音频编辑。未来的软件更新可能会带来改进,甚至恶化。

延迟监控器
延迟监控器
延迟监控器
延迟监控器
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2037.7 μs * -192%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1566 μs * -124%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
1162.9 μs * -66%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
989.1 μs * -42%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
698.6 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

Fusion 共可容纳两个 M.2-2280 格式的 PCIe-4 SSD。支持 RAID-0/1。我们测试设备的三星固态硬盘(1TB)提供了出色的数据传输速率。正面:我们没有注意到任何热节流现象。

笔记本电脑可容纳两个 PCIe-4 固态硬盘。
笔记本电脑可容纳两个 PCIe-4 固态硬盘。
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7119 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6895 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 790 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 550.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2954 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4529 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 65.05 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 281.6 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
89.9 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
 
83.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.5 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
78.4 pt
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
77.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
68.3 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
57.7 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4480 (4426.62min - 4479.73max) MB/s +23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4037 (3964.04min - 4036.7max) MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3645 (3579.03min - 3644.85max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)
3477 MB/s -5%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2556 - 4234, n=19)
3283 MB/s -10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3102 (3080.64min - 3101.78max) MB/s -15%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2620 (2556.56min - 2619.76max) MB/s -28%
seq write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3598 - 5842, n=19)
4816 MB/s +11%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4757 (4720.06min - 4757.31max) MB/s +10%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4371 (4342.15min - 4371.09max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4342 (4320.81min - 4342.28max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4093 (4016.82min - 4092.8max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)
3818 MB/s -12%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3038 (2862.26min - 3038.15max) MB/s -30%
seq q8 t1 read
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7079 (6575.14min - 7078.73max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7011 (6063.46min - 7010.81max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4958 - 7148, n=19)
6979 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6636 (6205.02min - 6635.75max) MB/s -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
6388 (5544.27min - 6387.72max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)
6318 MB/s -10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
5181 (4323.23min - 5181.35max) MB/s -26%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6897 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (6531 - 6898, n=19)
6796 MB/s -1%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5250 (5191.5min - 5250.22max) MB/s -24%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5234 (5167.11min - 5234.47max) MB/s -24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4949 (4932.28min - 4948.61max) MB/s -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)
4859 MB/s -30%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4821 (4606.6min - 4820.72max) MB/s -30%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
92.7 (91.49min - 92.68max) MB/s +29%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
83.5 (82.8min - 83.52max) MB/s +16%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (55.3 - 99, n=19)
77.1 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
71.8 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
51.3 (50.48min - 51.25max) MB/s -29%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
47.2 (45.9min - 47.16max) MB/s -34%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
340 (329.38min - 339.78max) MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
290 (278.05min - 290.22max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
251 (249.74min - 251.16max) MB/s -13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (133.9 - 343, n=19)
235 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)
223 MB/s -23%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
198.1 (195.9min - 198.06max) MB/s -32%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
128.1 (123.78min - 128.05max) MB/s -56%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4915 (4860.82min - 4914.87max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4055 (4044.11min - 4055.48max) MB/s -17%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3630 (3471.35min - 3629.9max) MB/s -26%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (818 - 4926, n=19)
3398 MB/s -31%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3302 (3194.22min - 3302.44max) MB/s -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)
2565 MB/s -48%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
900 (832.36min - 900.34max) MB/s -82%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3542 (3491.17min - 3541.69max) MB/s +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3443 (3007.99min - 3443.05max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3406 (3365.94min - 3405.88max) MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3003 (2991.33min - 3002.71max) MB/s -12%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (413 - 4683, n=19)
2584 MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)
2128 MB/s -38%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 (405.08min - 437.5max) MB/s -87%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9475 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
8778 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8364 Points -12%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (5405 - 10591, n=19)
8285 Points -13%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8059 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)
6733 Points -29%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5138 Points -46%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3530 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3233 Points -8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3152 Points -11%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3005 Points -15%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1349 - 4721, n=19)
2874 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)
2440 Points -31%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1458 Points -59%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4145 Points
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2308 - 4852, n=19)
4041 Points -3%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4006 Points -3%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3573 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3543 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)
3109 Points -25%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3029 Points -27%
Seq Read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5760.15 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5625.54 MB/s -2%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5592.15 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5355.36 MB/s -7%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4362 - 5760, n=19)
5223 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)
4948 MB/s -14%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4161.31 MB/s -28%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5243.63 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3376 - 5651, n=19)
4740 MB/s -10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4431.76 MB/s -15%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4431.18 MB/s -15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3950.35 MB/s -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)
3759 MB/s -28%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3587.95 MB/s -32%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
82.62 MB/s +29%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (52.7 - 90.9, n=19)
71.9 MB/s +13%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
71.52 MB/s +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)
65 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
63.85 MB/s
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
61.86 MB/s -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
49.79 MB/s -22%
4K Write
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
283.44 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
242.28 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (172.3 - 306, n=19)
221 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
213.76 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)
212 MB/s -12%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
191.79 MB/s -21%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
179.15 MB/s -26%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2982.47 MB/s
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2673.76 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2615.17 MB/s -12%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2374.63 MB/s -20%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (787 - 3182, n=19)
2235 MB/s -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)
1874 MB/s -37%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
845.48 MB/s -72%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3413.79 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1592 - 4090, n=19)
3352 MB/s -2%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3279.44 MB/s -4%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2951.09 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2933.74 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)
2524 MB/s -26%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2478.06 MB/s -27%
Access Time Read
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
0.088 ms * -76%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)
0.05551 ms * -11%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.054 ms * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.05 ms *
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.047 ms * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.042 ms * +16%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.018 - 0.074, n=19)
0.03384 ms * +32%
Access Time Write
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.07 ms * -268%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.059 ms * -211%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)
0.04751 ms * -150%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.02 ms * -5%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.012 - 0.053, n=19)
0.01995 ms * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.019 ms *
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
0.015 ms * +21%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6988 (6262.46-7033.01)
Aorus 16X 2024 Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5164 (4823.45-5192.86)
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7063 (6446.85-7107.46)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6318 (5640.08-6341.89)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5723 (3286.38-6614.84)

图形卡

申克允许笔记本电脑的 GeForce RTX 4070的最大 TGP 为 140 瓦(115 瓦 + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost)--Nvidia 并不建议超过此值。GPU 可以访问 8 GB VRAM(GDDR6)--对于当今的需求来说有点偏低。基准测试的结果高于 RTX-4070 的平均水平(Enthusiast),而Overboost只带来了微小的优势。在 dGPU 和 Optimus 之间切换需要重新启动。

Fire Strike (发烧友,连接电源)
Fire Strike (发烧友,连接电源)
Fire Strike (发烧友,电池模式)
Fire Strike (发烧友,电池模式)
Fire Strike (超增压,与电源连接)
Fire Strike (超增压,与电源连接)
Fire Strike (平衡,与电源连接)
Fire Strike (平衡,与电源连接)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
100 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
96.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
96.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
95.8 pt
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
94.4 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
89.6 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
87.8 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
85.3 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
46434 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
44902 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)
43891 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
43689 Points -3%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
42296 Points -6%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
41457 Points -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=64)
40454 Points -10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
39424 Points -12%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
32533 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)
31461 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
31274 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
31105 Points -1%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
30932 Points -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
29156 Points -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12242 - 33451, n=68)
29100 Points -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
28461 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
13391 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13336 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)
13142 Points +4%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12997 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12682 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12048 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5012 - 13391, n=66)
11617 Points -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
11181 Points -12%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
63892 points
3DMark 11 Performance
36008 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
26661 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
13067 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
23 Seconds * -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 30, n=65)
21.5 Seconds * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
21 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)
20.8 Seconds * +1%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3.3.3)
20 Seconds * +5%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
20 Seconds * +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost)
20 Seconds * +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
19 Seconds * +10%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 181, n=67)
40.2 Seconds * -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=184, last 2 years)
36.9 Seconds * -15%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
36 Seconds * -13%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3.3.3)
33 Seconds * -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
32 Seconds * -0%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
32 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
32 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost)
32 Seconds * -0%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
298 Seconds * -23%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3.3.3)
296 Seconds * -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)
293 Seconds * -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 440, n=64)
289 Seconds * -19%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
243 Seconds *
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
227 Seconds * +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
205 Seconds * +16%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost)
185 Seconds * +24%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
129366 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
128643 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 237138, n=188, last 2 years)
127665 Points -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
126537 Points -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
118601 Points -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (17391 - 132836, n=65)
114214 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
112841 Points -13%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
111153 Points -14%
Vulkan Score 5.5
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
93143 Points +32%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
75575 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (7995 - 163089, n=119, last 2 years)
72853 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
70440 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (8146 - 102618, n=36)
67413 Points -4%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
65414 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
58476 Points -17%
Geekbench 6.3
GPU OpenCL
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
129836 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost)
129433 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
120468 Points -7%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
120176 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4321 - 207373, n=111, last 2 years)
116410 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
115718 Points -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (85488 - 129836, n=41)
114102 Points -12%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
112875 Points -13%
GPU Vulkan
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost)
120033 Points +14%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
110951 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
105334 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
104883 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
90584 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (4286 - 196201, n=106, last 2 years)
82352 Points -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7760 - 120033, n=38)
70796 Points -33%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=112, last 2 years)
2199 mpaths +25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1868 mpaths +6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, Overboost)
1854 mpaths +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1758 mpaths
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5.0.1)
1738 mpaths -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1737 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (171 - 1872, n=37)
1650 mpaths -6%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=114, last 2 years)
1580 mpaths +25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1333 mpaths +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, Overboost)
1325 mpaths +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1266 mpaths
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5.0.1)
1259 mpaths -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1256 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (120 - 1356, n=37)
1195 mpaths -6%
CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, Overboost)
20388 mpaths +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
19077 mpaths +23%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
17465 mpaths +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
15556 mpaths
Average of class Gaming
  (3562 - 26944, n=116, last 2 years)
15186 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9339 - 20388, n=36)
14421 mpaths -7%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5.0.1)
12776 mpaths -18%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=150, last 2 years)
715 mpaths +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
675 mpaths +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07, Overboost)
635 mpaths +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (434 - 686, n=49)
603 mpaths 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
602 mpaths
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
596 mpaths -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
587 mpaths -2%
CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07, Overboost)
30730 ksamples +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
28791 ksamples +23%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
26677 ksamples +14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
23407 ksamples
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
21634 ksamples -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (5413 - 37629, n=150, last 2 years)
21586 ksamples -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12638 - 35173, n=49)
21145 ksamples -10%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

该硬件适用于高至最高设置下的 QHD 游戏。通过使用 DLSS 3 和 "帧生成",您可以在更高分辨率和最高设置下玩游戏,包括光线追踪,但仅限于支持这些功能的游戏。我们注意到,帧率高于 RTX-4070 的平均水平(Enthusiast),Overboost带来了微小的优势。

Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
99.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
98 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95.9 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
87.5 pt
Alienware m16 R2 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
81 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
133.7 (126min) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
133 fps +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years)
128.5 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
128 (110min) fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
122 fps -5%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
121.3 (115min) fps -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
114 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.8 - 133.7, n=56)
112.5 fps -12%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
140.5 (9.33min, 90.9P1) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137.6 (8.45min, 90.9P1) fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
127.2 (5.17min, 83.3P1) fps -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.8 (21.8min, 83.3P1) fps -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)
113.8 fps -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (48.3 - 141.6, n=60)
111.2 fps -19%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
107.2 (4.31min, 71.4P1) fps -22%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost)
131.9 fps +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
131 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
124.6 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)
120.1 fps -4%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
119.3 fps -4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
111.5 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41 - 131.9, n=62)
111.1 fps -11%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
108.3 fps -13%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
234 (27.8min, 175.8P1) fps +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)
229 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost)
222 (29.4min, 167.7P1) fps +4%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
219 (38.5min, 163.7P1) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
214 (38.2min, 161.4P1) fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
204 (69.2min, 153P1) fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (76.3 - 234, n=62)
196.3 fps -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
194.2 (59.2min, 144.5P1) fps -9%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
187.5 (160.5min) fps +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
185.3 (161min) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
182.1 (158.8min) fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
180.9 (156.5min) fps -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
154.1 (133.3min) fps -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)
151.2 fps -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (89.7 - 191.2, n=64)
148.1 fps -19%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
139.7 (120.9min) fps -23%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
138.4 fps +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137.6 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
136.9 fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.4 fps -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
114.9 fps -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)
108.5 fps -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (52.1 - 147.9, n=66)
104.6 fps -24%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.8 fps -34%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02, Overboost)
90.7 (67.4min) fps +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
87.1 (52.5min) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
87 (55.2min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=80, last 2 years)
86.5 fps -1%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
83.1 (28.4min) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (30.7 - 90.7, n=35)
79.4 fps -9%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
75.8 (32.9min) fps -13%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Gaming
  (24.8 - 110, n=71, last 2 years)
65.2 fps +24%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02, Overboost)
55.6 (42.5min) fps +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
52.8 (33.2min) fps 0%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
52.7 (40.5min) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
52.6 (39.5min) fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
49.4 (29.5min) fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24.8 - 57.1, n=33)
49.2 fps -6%
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02, Overboost)
46.8 (23.6min) fps +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.9 - 77.7, n=55, last 2 years)
45.5 fps +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
44.8 (15.7min) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
43.8 (34.3min) fps
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
42.4 (28.4min) fps -3%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
40.9 (21.5min) fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (19.1 - 46.8, n=20)
40.6 fps -7%
Dragon's Dogma 2
1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
80 (32.5min, 42.2P0.1, 60.3P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (61.3 - 80, n=5)
67.8 fps -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (49.5 - 80, n=8, last 2 years)
64.5 fps -19%
2560x1440 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
61.3 (37.3min, 38.9P0.1, 48.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (47.7 - 61.3, n=5)
55.3 fps -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (34.6 - 61.3, n=5, last 2 years)
51.8 fps -15%
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
128.5 fps +22%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
125.6 fps +20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105 (60.3min, 63.9P0.1, 89.7P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (34.5 - 208, n=45, last 2 years)
103.5 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (66.7 - 128.5, n=25)
101.3 fps -4%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89.6 fps +9%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88.3 fps +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 155.2, n=34, last 2 years)
82.2 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.1 (30.4min, 49.4P0.1, 68.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (54.4 - 89.6, n=21)
73.4 fps -11%
Alone in the Dark
1920x1080 Cinematic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (13.6 - 189.9, n=6, last 2 years)
126.3 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126 (31.5min, 37.7P0.1, 88.8P1) fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
124.7 (21.3min, 36.4P0.1, 57.1P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (105.5 - 126, n=5)
119.2 fps -5%
2560x1440 Cinematic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (64.7 - 133.6, n=4, last 2 years)
91.6 fps +20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76.6 (24.8min, 34.2P0.1, 53.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (37.4 - 76.6, n=5)
65.2 fps -15%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64.7 (22.8min, 23.8P0.1, 30.9P1) fps -16%
Alan Wake 2
1920x1080 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (17.1 - 123.3, n=18, last 2 years)
70.8 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70.1 (30.2min, 35.2P0.1, 41.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (65.1 - 71, n=6)
68.7 fps -2%
2560x1440 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (22.5 - 87.1, n=13, last 2 years)
62 fps +45%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
42.8 (10.4min, 22.7P0.1, 29.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (40.2 - 44.5, n=6)
42.5 fps -1%
The Witcher 3 v4.00
1920x1080 Ultra Preset / On AA:FX
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 150, n=16, last 2 years)
87.3 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 (7.86min, 52.7P0.1, 64.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (85 - 86.5, n=2)
85.8 fps -1%
1920x1080 RT Ultra Preset / On AA:FX
Average of class Gaming
  (12.9 - 66, n=10, last 2 years)
44.1 fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
40.4 (8.77min, 13.8P0.1, 30.3P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (36 - 40.4, n=2)
38.2 fps -5%

为了测试《Witcher 3》的帧速率是否能在较长时间内保持稳定,我们以全高清模式运行了约 60 分钟,并将设置调至最高。我们没有移动游戏角色。我们没有注意到帧速率的下降,但大约 50 分钟后,帧速率下降了百分之几(Enthusiast)。在激活配置文件 "超频 "的情况下,则不会出现这种情况。

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; FPS: Ø123.4 (111-129)
Aorus 16X 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; FPS: Ø118.6 (114-123)
Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø110 (97-116)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø113.2 (109-118)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø118.3 (114-125)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Overboost: Ø130.2 (125-135)
Witcher 3 (爱好者)
Witcher 3 (爱好者)
Witcher 3 超压
Witcher 3 超压
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 187.8 187 186.4 137.6 98.2
The Witcher 3 (2015) 603.3 418.4 246.2 128 92.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 234 207 196.5 182.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 226 175.5 124.6 90.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 205 173.3 136.9
Far Cry 5 (2018) 204 176 166 157 124
Strange Brigade (2018) 558 313 245 214 139.2
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) 271 215 176.2 86.5
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 157.2 121.2 106.1 105 82.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 156.6 124.5 103.6 87 52.6
Alan Wake 2 (2023) 74.3 71.4 70.1 42.8
Alone in the Dark (2024) 222 209 196.5 126 76.6
Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) 83.9 80 61.3

排放物 - 申克笔记本电脑温度很高

噪音排放

在日常使用和空转时,笔记本电脑的运行非常安静。虽然风扇一直处于激活状态(可通过 BIOS 关闭),但只有在非常安静的环境中才能听到风扇的声音。在负载情况下,情况很快就会发生变化:我们注意到风扇发出的噪音高达 53 dB(A)("发烧友"模式)。超频模式下的数值甚至更高。在使用平衡模式时,设备运行时的噪音要小得多,但也牺牲了一些性能。

Noise Level

Idle
27 / 28 / 33 dB(A)
Load
52 / 53 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.640.242.642.940.92534.736.639.140.936.73141.545.949.24645.5402729.331.532.932.15028.427.32825.227.96337.128.428.924.435.38044.725.218.817.543.810025.319.91916.826.112524.319.719.717.327.516027.622.419.918.429.620029.326.525.324.531.225030.325.521.419.431.231531.520.818.416.233.240034.921.217.613.135.850036.924.716.911.638.263038.923.516.711.339.480040.523.215.311.540.5100041.322.115.311.341.5125041.922.315.411.142.7160043.122.415.111.643.3200043.321.314.611.843.4250042.919.914.312.243.2315042.319.713.512.742.1400040.817.513.512.740.8500039.615.713.612.839.2630038.716.513.912.738.7800036.11613.813.236.11000033.416.91412.833.11250030.117.514.113.229.81600027.226.118.920.827.4SPL52.932.927.425.153.1N8.71.80.90.68.8median 36.9median 21.2median 15.3median 12.8median 38.2Delta5.82.52.22.45.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise
-5%
8%
5%
6%
off / environment *
25
26
-4%
24.7
1%
24
4%
23.9
4%
Idle Minimum *
27
26
4%
25.3
6%
29
-7%
24.3
10%
Idle Average *
28
32
-14%
25.3
10%
30
-7%
24.3
13%
Idle Maximum *
33
38
-15%
25.3
23%
31
6%
28.9
12%
Load Average *
52
54
-4%
31.7
39%
45
13%
45.8
12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
50
2%
53.8
-5%
44
14%
51
-0%
Load Maximum *
53
55
-4%
62
-17%
47
11%
56.6
-7%

* ... smaller is better

温度

压力测试和 Witcher 3测试导致笔记本电脑明显发热。有时会达到 50 摄氏度以上。在日常使用中(办公、上网),数值一般保持在绿色区域内。

Max. Load
 48 °C48 °C47 °C 
 43 °C44 °C42 °C 
 33 °C34 °C33 °C 
Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 41.3 °C
54 °C56 °C49 °C
50 °C51 °C41 °C
33 °C33 °C32 °C
Maximum: 56 °C
Average: 44.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  44 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat
-5%
-14%
-6%
-8%
Maximum Upper Side *
48
41
15%
44.8
7%
49
-2%
43.8
9%
Maximum Bottom *
56
41
27%
48
14%
63
-13%
55.4
1%
Idle Upper Side *
28
37
-32%
37.2
-33%
30
-7%
32.8
-17%
Idle Bottom *
29
38
-31%
42
-45%
29
-0%
36
-24%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

压力测试模拟的极端情况(Prime95 和 Furmark 连续运行)检查了系统在满负荷情况下的稳定性。CPU 时钟从略高于基本时钟频率的值缓慢持续下降到低于基本时钟频率的值。图形核心始终高速运行。

Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

发言人

笔记本电脑的立体声扬声器能产生不错的音效,但缺乏低音。连接耳机或外置扬声器可以获得更好的音效体验。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.9452540.939.5314650.94032.933.45025.232.86324.433.88017.527.410016.826.912517.339.916018.453.620024.564.525019.468.731516.268.440013.171.950011.68163011.380.480011.574100011.369.9125011.170.6160011.670.6200011.872.8250012.270315012.769.3400012.768.3500012.865.9630012.773.8800013.273.31000012.869.31250013.268.91600020.869.5SPL25.185.1N0.667median 12.8median 69.5Delta2.42.640.238.141.53751.448.536.534.544.244.429.432.924.739.221.449.129.258.225.563.323.564.621.26716.267.21470.614.377.615.777.812.574.711.770.211.666.911.970.512.369.312.872.913.370.814.176.813.770.91465.513.868.213.270.112.971.612.465.826.584.50.865.9median 13.8median 70.13.53.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)Aorus 16X 2024
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Aorus 16X 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - Fusion 15 的运行时间非常出色

耗电量

对于已安装的硬件而言,其电力需求基本正常。例外情况:尽管电池电量充足,但我们测得笔记本电脑在关机状态下的功耗值约为 20 瓦。这可能是一个错误。测试 Witcher 3测试和压力测试运行时,功耗值略有下降。电源(280 瓦)功率充足。

Power Consumption
Idledarkmidlight 8 / 14 / 26 Watt
Load midlight 118 / 244 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-21%
-3%
-10%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
8
13
-63%
8.1
-1%
10
-25%
Idle Average *
14
18
-29%
13
7%
18
-29%
Idle Maximum *
26
35
-35%
40.3
-55%
32
-23%
Load Average *
118
138
-17%
79
33%
128
-8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
192.7
172.6
10%
188.1
2%
148.4
23%
Load Maximum *
244
222
9%
254.9
-4%
242
1%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø192.7 (182.8-220)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø195.5 (184.9-229)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø13.5 (8.11-25.8)

Power consumption with external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø111.6 (110.9-114.8)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø109.5 (108.4-112.6)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø167.2 (164.2-172.9)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø187.8 (163.3-206)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø20.1 (16.6-24.4)

运行时间

在 WiFi 测试(通过脚本加载网站)和视频测试(循环播放短片 Big Buck Bunny(H.264 编码,FHD))中,我们测得的运行时间分别为 8:00 小时和 10:02小时。这些数值都非常不错。

电池容量为 99.8 Wh。
电池容量为 99.8 Wh。
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
15h 11min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 124)
8h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 44min
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-17%
-26%
-39%
-52%
-35%
Reader / Idle
911
753
-17%
758
-17%
403
-56%
H.264
602
541
-10%
WiFi v1.3
480
481
0%
483
1%
292
-39%
290
-40%
Load
164
100
-39%
60
-63%
65
-60%

Pros

+ 明亮的 QHD+ 屏幕,宽高比为 16:10(240 Hz、自适应同步、sRGB)
+ 高系统性能
+ 两个固态硬盘插槽(PCIe 4,M.2-2280)
+ 内存可交换/扩展
+ 单键 RGB 背光
+ 雷电 4
+ 电力传输
+ 良好的运行时间

Cons

- 满载时噪音大、温度高
- 8 GB VRAM 不太适合未来使用
- 没有高级擎天柱

评价:便携、强大、坚韧不拔

XMG Fusion 15(早期 24 型),申克公司提供的测试样品。
XMG Fusion 15(早期 24 型),申克公司提供的测试样品。

紧凑的尺寸和较轻的重量(约 2.1 千克)不会降低硬件性能。处理器 酷睿 i9处理器和 GeForce RTX 4070能够以稳定的高时钟频率工作。这款笔记本电脑将性能与便携性完美融合,可谓成功之作。

XMG Fusion 15(24 出头)--一款功能强大的便携式笔记本电脑,适合游戏玩家和创作者。

这款笔记本电脑在负载情况下温度较高,因此会产生大量噪音。如果噪音较小,则需要牺牲一些计算能力。它的 15.3 英寸屏幕(2560 x 1600 像素、IPS、240 Hz、自适应同步)采用 16:10 宽高比,整体效果令人印象深刻。其高亮度也值得一提。

一次充满电(99.8 瓦时)的实际运行时间约为 8-10 小时,非常不错。优点电池可通过 USB-C 电源(最小 100 瓦,20 V)充电,笔记本电脑的 TB4 端口支持 Power Delivery。因此,您不必一直携带专有电源(280 瓦)。

另一种选择是 Aorus 16X (2024).这款笔记本电脑的计算能力相当,运行时间也同样出色。

价格和供应情况

XMG Fusion 15(早期 24 型)可直接通过Schenker 在线商店进行配置和订购。.目前的测试设备价格约为 2,500 美元。起价约为 1,700 美元。

SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) - 05/01/2024 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
83 / 98 → 84%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
72 / 80 → 90%
Weight
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Battery
82 / 95 → 86%
Display
92%
Games Performance
99%
Application Performance
97%
Temperature
81 / 95 → 85%
Noise
68 / 90 → 76%
Audio
82%
Camera
46 / 85 → 54%
Average
79%
89%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > XMG Fusion 15(提前 24 天)评测:专为游戏玩家和创作者打造的紧凑型 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑
Sascha Mölck, 2024-05- 4 (Update: 2024-05- 4)