Notebookcheck Logo

Aorus 16X (2024) 评测:酷睿 i9 和 RTX 4070 售价 2,000 美元

动力室。

Aorus 16X (2024) 配备了酷睿 i9-14900HX 和GeForce RTX 4070,可用于视频编辑、游戏和渲染。此外,还配备了明亮的 16 英寸显示屏(16:10、2560 x 1600 像素、G-Sync)、32 GB 内存、两个各 1 TB 存储空间的固态硬盘以及一个雷电 4 端口。
Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Wi-Fi 7 Windows

Aorus 16X ASG 的主要优势在于游戏、渲染和内容创建。Raptor Lake 和 Ada Lovelace 提供了所需的性能。其竞争对手包括 Alienware m16 R2, HP Omen Transcend 16, XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23), 华硕 TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI联想Legion Pro 5 16IRX9.

Aorus 16X 2024 (16X Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 120 W PL2 / Short Burst, 90 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2175 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDRR6, 31.0.15.5186, Advanced Optimus + MUX-Switch
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, Dolby Vision, G-Sync, Pantone Validated, glossy: no, HDR, 165 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 1810 GB free
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 0 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Headset combined port, Card Reader: MicroSD, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 20 x 356 x 254
Battery
99 Wh, 6215 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: FHD IR
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Microsoft OneNote (Trial), Microsoft 365 (Trial), 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.333 kg, Power Supply: 564 g
Price
1999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
87.4 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
90.2 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg23.5 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
85.6 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg25.4 mm17.30"1920x1080
87.9 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.3 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.95 mm16.00"2560x1600

外壳 - LED 灯带增添乐趣

这款笔记本电脑的技术装备采用深灰色外壳,表面磨砂处理。总的来说,技嘉采用了更为简约的外观设计。除了键盘的背光之外,设备背面的两条 LED 灯带也为其外观增添了几分多彩的乐趣。底座由塑料制成,盖子则采用铝质材料。拆下机箱底部后,就可以看到电池(用螺丝固定,而非胶粘)以及笔记本电脑的其他内部结构。

我们没有发现任何制造错误,所有缝隙都排列整齐。机盖和底座可以轻微扭动,但这并不影响正常使用。铰链将盖子牢牢固定到位,但在调整角度时,盖子会有轻微反弹。其最大开启角度约为 130 度。单手即可打开。

Aorus 16X (2024)
Aorus 16X (2024)
Aorus 16X (2024)
Aorus 16X (2024)
Aorus 16X (2024)
Aorus 16X (2024)
Aorus 16X (2024)
Aorus 16X (2024)
Aorus 16X (2024)
Aorus 16X (2024)
Aorus 16X (2024)
Aorus 16X (2024)
Aorus 16X (2024)
Aorus 16X (2024)

Aorus 16X 是同类产品中最紧凑、最轻便的设备之一。

尺寸比较

395 mm 264 mm 25.4 mm 2.5 kg363.4 mm 261.75 mm 26.95 mm 2.5 kg363.9 mm 249.4 mm 23.5 mm 2.5 kg359.5 mm 273 mm 19.9 mm 2.6 kg356 mm 254 mm 20 mm 2.3 kg356 mm 269 mm 20 mm 2.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 技嘉笔记本电脑采用 Thunderbolt 4 技术

16X 有两个 USB-A 端口(USB 3.2 Gen 2)和两个 USB-C 端口(1 个 USB 3.2 Gen 2、1 个 Thunderbolt 4)。TB4 端口支持 Power Delivery,两个 USB-C 接口均可输出 DisplayPort 信号。这款笔记本电脑总共配备了三个视频输出接口(1 个 HDMI 接口,2 个 DP 接口)。一个音频插孔和一个千兆以太网端口使整套配置更加完善。

技嘉将所有连接都放在了设备左右两侧的中间位置。Pam 托架旁边的区域一般没有线缆。

左侧:电源连接、千兆以太网、HDMI、USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A)、Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C;Power Delivery、DisplayPort)
左侧:电源连接、千兆以太网、HDMI、USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A)、Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C;Power Delivery、DisplayPort)
右侧:音频组合、存储卡读卡器(MicroSD)、USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C;DisplayPort)、USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A)
右侧:音频组合、存储卡读卡器(MicroSD)、USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C;DisplayPort)、USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A)

SD 读卡器

该设备的 MicroSD 读卡器(参考卡:AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)是速度较快的型号之一,最大传输速率为 186 MB/s(传输 250 张 jpg 图像,每张图像大小约为 5 MB)和 188 MB/s(复制较大的数据块)。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
186 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s -48%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
86 MB/s -54%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
75.3 MB/s -60%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
205.32 MB/s +9%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
188 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=87, last 2 years)
120.4 MB/s -36%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
90 MB/s -52%

交流

在最佳条件下(附近没有 WLAN 设备,笔记本电脑和服务器电脑之间的距离很短),我们注意到 WiFi 数据传输率非常高。16X 在发送数据时表现不佳可能是由于驱动程序问题。技嘉笔记本电脑使用的是 WiFi 7 芯片(英特尔 BE200)。有线连接由 Realtek 制造的控制器(RTL8168/8111;1 GBit/s)负责。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1411 (1327min - 1472max) MBit/s +201%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1386 (708min - 1471max) MBit/s +196%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=147, last 2 years)
1227 MBit/s +162%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202
1205 (875min - 1438max) MBit/s +157%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
  (469 - 1642, n=20)
1192 MBit/s +154%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
Realtek RTL8852BE
875 (812min - 916max) MBit/s +87%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
636 (485min - 769max) MBit/s +36%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
469 (304min - 548max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1714 (1696min - 1727max) MBit/s +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1697 (849min - 1712max) MBit/s +8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1577 (1237min - 1665max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=147, last 2 years)
1390 MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
  (838 - 1701, n=20)
1358 MBit/s -14%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202
1227 (1074min - 1317max) MBit/s -22%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1040 (739min - 1218max) MBit/s -34%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
Realtek RTL8852BE
843 (621min - 906max) MBit/s -47%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø469 (304-548)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1205 (875-1438)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1411 (1327-1472)
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø875 (812-916)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1362 (708-1471)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø636 (485-769)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1576 (1237-1665)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1227 (1074-1317)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1668 (849-1712)
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø843 (621-906)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1714 (1696-1727)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1039 (739-1218)

网络摄像头

网络摄像头(210 万像素,最大 1,920 x 1,080 像素,红外)只能提供一般质量的图像。色彩精确度是它的不足之处:偏差约为 10,未能达到目标值(DeltaE 低于 3)。不过,它支持 Windows Hello。不过,它没有机械盖。

ColorChecker
9.2 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
17 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
12 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Aorus 16X 2024: 10.15 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 16.95 ∆E

配件

除了常规文件(快速入门指南和保修信息)外,笔记本电脑没有随附其他配件。

维护

拧下设备底部的所有螺丝后,可以使用扁铲或拨子弹帮助拆下机箱底部。随后,就可以访问内存库(均已占用)、两个固态硬盘(PCIe 4、M.2-2280)、WLAN 模块、风扇、BIOS 电池和普通电池。

硬件 Aorus 16X (2024)
硬件 Aorus 16X (2024)
硬件 Aorus 16X (2024)
硬件 Aorus 16X (2024)
硬件 Aorus 16X (2024)
硬件 Aorus 16X (2024)

保修

16 英寸设备的标准保修期为 12 个月。没有延长保修期的选项。

输入设备 - Aorus 笔记本电脑配有背光键盘

键盘

木巧键盘上的按键(三段式 RGB 照明)具有适中的升力和清晰的压力点。按键阻力尚可。键入时键盘会略微倾斜,但尚未证明会造成困扰。不错:四个方向键均为全尺寸。技嘉决定不安装数字键盘。总之,制造商提供了一款适合日常使用的键盘。

触摸板

多点触摸点击板(约 13.3 x 9 厘米)可替代鼠标,其光滑的表面便于手指滑动。它的特点是提升距离短,压力点清晰。

键盘 Aorus 16X (2024)
键盘 Aorus 16X (2024)

显示屏 - 明亮、16:10、sRGB

子像素
子像素

技嘉安装了 165-Hz 面板,支持 G-Sync。后者可动态调整显示器和 GPU 的刷新率,以创建尽可能流畅的画面,尤其是在游戏时。

在任何亮度设置下,我们都没有发现 PWM 闪烁的迹象。16:10 雾面 16 英寸面板(2,560 x 1,600 像素)的亮度和对比度都达到了各自的目标(大于 300 cd/m² 或 1,000:1)。其高亮度尤其值得一提。

483
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
547
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 547 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 504 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 542 cd/m²
Contrast: 1204:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.73 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.32
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.192
Aorus 16X 2024
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Alienware m16 R2
BOE NE16NYH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
BOE NE160QDM-NYC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display
4%
31%
-40%
2%
2%
Display P3 Coverage
67.2
71
6%
99.8
49%
39.7
-41%
69.4
3%
69.3
3%
sRGB Coverage
96.7
100
3%
100
3%
59.1
-39%
98.2
2%
99.4
3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.3
71.4
3%
97
40%
41
-41%
70.1
1%
70.1
1%
Response Times
-19%
97%
-409%
-53%
-62%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.5 ?(3.3, 4.2)
5.7 ?(2.6, 3.1)
24%
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
97%
39 ?(18, 21)
-420%
12.2 ?(5.9, 6.3)
-63%
11.9 ?(5.5, 6.4)
-59%
Response Time Black / White *
5.4 ?(1.5, 3.9)
8.7 ?(4.6, 4.1)
-61%
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
96%
26.9 ?(13.8, 13.1)
-398%
7.7 ?(4, 3.7)
-43%
8.9 ?(4.8, 4.1)
-65%
PWM Frequency
120 ?(100)
Screen
11%
162%
-50%
-9%
17%
Brightness middle
542
345.8
-36%
390
-28%
255.9
-53%
349
-36%
384
-29%
Brightness
504
337
-33%
392
-22%
248
-51%
348
-31%
366
-27%
Brightness Distribution
86
87
1%
98
14%
91
6%
93
8%
91
6%
Black Level *
0.45
0.3
33%
0.02
96%
0.21
53%
0.32
29%
0.35
22%
Contrast
1204
1153
-4%
19500
1520%
1219
1%
1091
-9%
1097
-9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.73
1.99
27%
1.94
29%
4.51
-65%
1.98
27%
0.97
64%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.29
3.52
33%
4.26
19%
20.77
-293%
7.56
-43%
3.57
33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.32
0.62
53%
4.21
-219%
1.82
-38%
1.45
-10%
0.77
42%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
2.1
28%
1.5
48%
3.2
-10%
3.3
-14%
1.5
48%
Gamma
2.192 100%
2.32 95%
2.221 99%
2.08 106%
2.137 103%
2.24 98%
CCT
6173 105%
6369 102%
6395 102%
6054 107%
6672 97%
6709 97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1% / 6%
97% / 124%
-166% / -99%
-20% / -13%
-14% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

开箱后,屏幕就显示出良好的色彩描绘效果:偏差约为 2.7,达到了目标(DeltaE < 3)。校准后,偏差减小到 1.3,确保了更均衡的灰度。面板可以完全再现 sRGB 色彩空间,但不能再现 AdobeRGB 和 DCI P3 色彩空间。这与大多数竞争对手的显示器并无不同。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
CalMAN:色彩饱和度
CalMAN:色彩饱和度
CalMAN: 色彩检查器
CalMAN: 色彩检查器
CalMAN:灰度(校准)
CalMAN:灰度(校准)
CalMAN: 色彩饱和度(校准)
CalMAN: 色彩饱和度(校准)
CalMAN:色彩校验器(已校准)
CalMAN:色彩校验器(已校准)
Aorus 16X 与 sRGB
Aorus 16X 与 sRGB
Aorus 16X 与 AdobeRGB
Aorus 16X 与 AdobeRGB
Aorus 16X 与 DCI-P3
Aorus 16X 与 DCI-P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.5 ms rise
↘ 3.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.3 ms rise
↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

视角稳定的 IPS 面板在任何角度都清晰易读。在室外,只要阳光不是太强烈,您就可以从面板上阅读。

外面是 Aorus 16 X。
外面是 Aorus 16 X。
视角
视角

性能 - Raptor Lake 和 Ada Lovelace 为设备提供动力

技嘉的 Aorus 16X 是一款面向游戏玩家和创作者的笔记本电脑。Raptor Lake 和 Ada Lovelace 提供了必要的计算能力。目前该机型的售价约为2,000 美元。也有更便宜的型号。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Nvidia 系统信息
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 

测试条件

16X 提供六种制造商特定的性能模式(见表),可通过技嘉控制中心(笔记本电脑的控制中心)进行切换。我们使用了标准模式(基准测试)和节能静音模式(电池测试)。Turbo(加速)、Gaming(游戏 )和 Creator(创作 )模式只能在笔记本连接电源的情况下使用。

注意:技嘉控制中心内的可用性能设置传达得不是很清楚。全系统性能配置文件可在 "AI Boost "部分找到。AI Power Gear "部分仅涉及 dGPU 的运行状态(仅 dGPU 或关闭,图形切换)。

标准 Creator Turbo Gaming Meeting 节能静音
功率限制 1 (HWInfo) 90 瓦 110 瓦 125 瓦 110 瓦 65 瓦 65 瓦
功率限制 2 (HWInfo) 120 瓦 135 瓦 150 瓦 135 瓦 100 瓦 100 瓦
技嘉控制中心
技嘉控制中心
技嘉控制中心
技嘉控制中心
技嘉控制中心
技嘉控制中心
技嘉控制中心
技嘉控制中心

处理器

酷睿 i9-14900HX 酷睿 i9-14900HXRaptor Lake)的 24 个 CPU 内核(8P + 16E = 32 个线程)的最高时钟频率为 5.8 GHz(P)和 4.1 GHz(E)。连续多线程负载(CB15 Loop)导致其时钟频率从第四次运行下降到第五次运行。之后,它保持了相当稳定的水平。TurboGamingCreator配置文件使性能水平持续上升。

其基准测试成绩与 CPU 的平均水平相当。在电池模式下,其单线程性能(187 分;CB15)的下降幅度小于多线程性能(1,533 分;CB15)。

有关酷睿 i9 的更多信息,请参阅我们的分析文章。

多线程(与电源连接)
多线程(与电源连接)
单线程(与电源连接)
单线程(与电源连接)

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0230460690920115013801610184020702300253027602990322034503680391041404370Tooltip
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3877 (3701.99-4280.82)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2777 (2743.86-2839.9)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø2840 (2582.31-3904.72)
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2784 (2741.98-2817.3)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2574 (2525.07-2739.09)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4230 (4151.1-4590.84)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX; Turbo: Ø4520 (4498.43-4537.72)
CB15 回路(标准)
CB15 回路(标准)
CB15 循环(涡轮增压)
CB15 循环(涡轮增压)
CB15 Loop(创作者/游戏)
CB15 Loop(创作者/游戏)
CB15 河套地区(会议)
CB15 河套地区(会议)
CB15 回路(节能静音型)
CB15 回路(节能静音型)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
86.8 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
83.5 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
82.4 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
81.5 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
71.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
66.4 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
61.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
61.3 pt
Alienware m16 R2 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60.4 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Turbo)
30284 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
29686 (26317.7min - 29686max) Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17078 - 36249, n=38)
28781 Points +3%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27818 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)
21994 Points -21%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
20702 Points -26%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
18419 (18019.3min - 18419.5max) Points -34%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
17706 Points -36%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
17623 (17398.8min - 17622.8max) Points -37%
Single Core
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Turbo)
2206 Points +1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2188 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2182 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1720 - 2245, n=39)
2146 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2122 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
1927 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)
1894 Points -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1832 Points -16%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1749 Points -20%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Turbo)
11634 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11319 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6579 - 13832, n=37)
10930 Points +3%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10655 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8427 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)
8352 Points -22%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7050 Points -34%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6894 Points -35%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
6773 Points -36%
CPU (Single Core)
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
841 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Turbo)
840 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
836 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (657 - 859, n=37)
824 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
812 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
735 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)
727 Points -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
714 Points -15%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
674 Points -20%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4591 (4151.1min - 4590.84max) Points +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Turbo)
4538 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 5589, n=38)
4424 Points +3%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4280 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3905 (2582.31min - 3904.72max) Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)
3440 Points -20%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2840 (2743.86min - 2839.9max) Points -34%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2817 (2741.98min - 2817.3max) Points -34%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
2739 Points -36%
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Turbo)
318 Points +2%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
312 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (247 - 323, n=37)
305 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
299 Points -4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
298 Points -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
287 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
278 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)
278 Points -11%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
256 Points -18%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
186 Seconds * -48%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
183 Seconds * -45%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)
169.4 Seconds * -34%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
164 Seconds * -30%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
126 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (91 - 206, n=37)
121.2 Seconds * +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
113 Seconds * +10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Turbo)
111 Seconds * +12%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Turbo)
118593 MIPS +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
115585 MIPS +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (66769 - 136645, n=37)
111239 MIPS +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
106866 MIPS
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
88012 MIPS -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)
85738 MIPS -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
72749 MIPS -32%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
68491 MIPS -36%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
67581 MIPS -37%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Turbo)
7333 MIPS 0%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7297 MIPS
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7142 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (5452 - 7545, n=37)
7021 MIPS -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6776 MIPS -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6642 MIPS -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
6458 MIPS -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)
6322 MIPS -13%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5037 MIPS -31%
Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
18126 Points +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Turbo)
17781 Points +2%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
17408 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13158 - 19665, n=37)
17321 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
16011 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=112, last 2 years)
14207 Points -18%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
14090 Points -19%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
12670 Points -27%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (6.2.1)
12447 Points -28%
Single-Core
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Turbo)
3082 Points +1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
3054 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2419 - 3129, n=37)
2967 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
2889 Points -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
2800 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (6.2.1)
2730 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3129, n=112, last 2 years)
2651 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
2645 Points -13%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
2383 Points -22%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
21299 Points +9%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Turbo)
20367 Points +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19607 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 23194, n=37)
19449 Points -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17612 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)
15098 Points -23%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
13072 Points -33%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12328 Points -37%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
11399 Points -42%
Single-Core
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2183 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Turbo)
2126 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2210, n=37)
2092 Points -4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2053 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2046 Points -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2014 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)
1898 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
1861 Points -15%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1741 Points -20%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Turbo)
31.8 fps +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.1 fps +11%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (16.8 - 38.9, n=37)
29.3 fps +9%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)
23.6 fps -13%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
22.7 fps -16%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
21.8 fps -19%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
21.2 fps -21%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
18.9 fps -30%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
53.1 s * -38%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.3.4.2)
49.8 s * -29%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (6.3.4.2)
49.4 s * -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)
48.1 s * -25%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (31.4 - 199, n=37)
47.5 s * -23%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
44.2 s * -15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
40.7 s * -6%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
38.5 s *
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2, Turbo)
33.9 s * +12%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.487 sec * -29%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4412 sec * -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)
0.4366 sec * -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
0.4278 sec * -13%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3955 sec * -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3917 sec * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=37)
0.385 sec * -2%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3782 sec *
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Turbo)
0.3743 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
4280 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
262 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
312 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
10655 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
841 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
27818 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2188 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1456 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
130.7 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
97.6 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
93.7 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
92.5 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.4 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
78.1 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
68.5 pt
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
65.8 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
28889 KRay/s +25%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Turbo)
27486 KRay/s +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
25072 KRay/s +9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13098 - 33474, n=36)
24763 KRay/s +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
23082 KRay/s
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)
21963 KRay/s -5%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
18470 KRay/s -20%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
17244 KRay/s -25%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
16419 KRay/s -29%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Turbo)
134014 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
129169 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (67573 - 166040, n=36)
124114 Points +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
123214 Points +5%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
116836 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)
106952 Points -8%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
92996 Points -20%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
88537 Points -24%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
83334 Points -29%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Turbo)
6720 MB/s +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
6285 MB/s +10%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3589 - 7979, n=36)
6130 MB/s +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
5723 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
5119 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)
4920 MB/s -14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
4267 MB/s -25%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
4242 MB/s -26%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
3809 MB/s -33%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
142503 Points +2%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Turbo)
139725 Points 0%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
139355 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148966, n=36)
138261 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
121191 Points -13%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
118405 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)
117347 Points -16%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
104502 Points -25%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
84180 Points -40%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Turbo)
15831 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
15511 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
15401 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (10475 - 18517, n=36)
15241 Points +3%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
14830 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)
13290 Points -10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
12217 Points -18%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
10617 Points -28%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
10361 Points -30%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Turbo)
66739 Points +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
66238 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
62567 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (32543 - 83662, n=36)
61081 Points +6%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
57633 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)
53819 Points -7%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
47685 Points -17%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
43302 Points -25%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
40932 Points -29%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
141059 MB/s +25%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=36)
139038 MB/s +23%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Turbo)
128648 MB/s +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
120213 MB/s +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
112833 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)
109208 MB/s -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
91719 MB/s -19%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
86964 MB/s -23%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
82757 MB/s -27%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Turbo)
1936 MB/s +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1866 MB/s +12%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1054 - 2292, n=36)
1791 MB/s +8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1662 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)
1369 MB/s -18%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1265 MB/s -24%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1219 MB/s -27%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1152 MB/s -31%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
1088 MB/s -35%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
15675 KRay/s +27%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Turbo)
14576 KRay/s +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13776 KRay/s +12%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6809 - 18349, n=36)
13332 KRay/s +8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
12355 KRay/s
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)
11830 KRay/s -4%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
9802 KRay/s -21%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
9170 KRay/s -26%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
8955 KRay/s -28%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49676 MPixel/s +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49507 MPixel/s +1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Turbo)
49228 MPixel/s 0%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49217 MPixel/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
47412 MPixel/s -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (23903 - 54702, n=36)
46878 MPixel/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)
40303 MPixel/s -18%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
39532 MPixel/s -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
33407 MPixel/s -32%

系统性能

运行流畅的系统并不缺乏计算能力。游戏、流媒体和渲染不会给笔记本电脑带来任何重大挑战。内存的传输速率达到了 DDR5-5600 内存的正常水平。

内存以双通道模式运行。
内存以双通道模式运行。
PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8550 Points +2%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
8389 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7768 - 8550, n=8)
8193 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
8092 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8010 Points -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
7866 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)
7813 Points -7%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7761 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11940 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11286 Points +2%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
11071 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10896 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10104 - 11815, n=8)
10896 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years)
10836 Points -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10621 Points -4%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10330 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
11103 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9577 - 11103, n=8)
10431 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10425 Points -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10268 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10139 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years)
9909 Points -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9693 Points -13%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9422 Points -15%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
14827 Points +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
13618 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12114 - 14827, n=8)
13160 Points +1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
13036 Points
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13035 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years)
12168 Points -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
12114 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11204 Points -14%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2312 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2002 - 2312, n=7)
2186 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2002 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1955 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=144, last 2 years)
1910 Points -17%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1797 Points -22%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1762 Points -24%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2191 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1827 - 2191, n=7)
2066 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1884 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1827 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=144, last 2 years)
1809 Points -17%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1740 Points -21%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1684 Points -23%
CrossMark / Creativity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2458 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2258 - 2458, n=7)
2363 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2287 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=144, last 2 years)
2099 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2028 Points -17%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1979 Points -19%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1913 Points -22%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2259 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1734 - 2330, n=7)
2056 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1952 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1769 Points -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=144, last 2 years)
1707 Points -24%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1576 Points -30%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1478 Points -35%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
342 Points +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
330 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
322 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (269 - 342, n=8)
322 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
320 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
319 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=160, last 2 years)
304 Points -8%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
294 Points -11%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (291 - 304, n=6)
298 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
291 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
271 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (176.4 - 328, n=149, last 2 years)
268 Points
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
257 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
546 ms * -25%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
505 ms * -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 674, n=175, last 2 years)
502 ms * -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
481 ms * -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
449 ms * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (431 - 469, n=8)
448 ms * -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 ms * -0%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
436 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
8389 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78979 MB/s 0%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78854 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78330 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (38028 - 83392, n=36)
75105 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70102 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)
65546 MB/s -17%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63008 MB/s -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
59740 MB/s -24%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86538 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86376 MB/s 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85070 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43306 - 87568, n=36)
81377 MB/s -6%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76370 MB/s -12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75433 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)
69486 MB/s -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
61456 MB/s -29%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77579 MB/s 0%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77406 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77346 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72700 MB/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (37146 - 80589, n=36)
72406 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72225 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)
67309 MB/s -13%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66009 MB/s -15%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.2 ns * -53%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)
93.8 ns * -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.8 ns * -11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.1 ns * -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 ns * -5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (76.1 - 105, n=36)
84.7 ns * -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.4 ns * -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.5 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

标准延迟监控器测试(网上冲浪、4K 视频播放、Prime95 高负载)发现了一些异常情况。该系统似乎不适合实时视频和音频编辑。未来的软件更新可能会带来改进,甚至恶化。

延迟监控器
延迟监控器
延迟监控器
延迟监控器
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2037.7 μs * -75%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1857.6 μs * -60%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1776.4 μs * -53%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1566 μs * -35%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
1162.9 μs *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
989.1 μs * +15%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

16X 配备了两块 PCIe 4 固态硬盘,每块的存储容量为 1 TB(M.2-2280)--它们没有组成 RAID 阵列。一个固态硬盘用作系统硬盘,另一个用作数据存储,两个固态硬盘的数据传输率都非常高。我们没有注意到由于热节流而导致的性能下降。

16X 通常支持 RAID。不过,首先必须在 BIOS 中激活相应的选项,然后重新安装 Windows。没有经验的人不建议使用此程序。

两个固态硬盘不组成 RAID 阵列。
两个固态硬盘不组成 RAID 阵列。
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 5206 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4828 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 772.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 549.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2712 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4813 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 50.35 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 328.6 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
90.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
78.2 pt
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
 
75.7 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
74.9 pt
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
74.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
66 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
56.3 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
43 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4480 (4426.62min - 4479.73max) MB/s +71%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4037 (3964.04min - 4036.7max) MB/s +54%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)
3477 MB/s +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3426 (3325.1min - 3425.77max) MB/s +31%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3157 (2968.73min - 3157.45max) MB/s +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3102 (3080.64min - 3101.78max) MB/s +18%
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (2366 - 2981, n=3)
2656 MB/s +1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2620 (2556.56min - 2619.76max) MB/s
seq write
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4757 (4720.06min - 4757.31max) MB/s
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (4659 - 4772, n=3)
4729 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4698 (3640.45min - 4697.66max) MB/s -1%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4371 (4342.15min - 4371.09max) MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4093 (4016.82min - 4092.8max) MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)
3818 MB/s -20%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3038 (2862.26min - 3038.15max) MB/s -36%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3019 (2871.34min - 3019.1max) MB/s -37%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7090 (6633.87min - 7089.84max) MB/s +37%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7079 (6575.14min - 7078.73max) MB/s +37%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6636 (6205.02min - 6635.75max) MB/s +28%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
6388 (5544.27min - 6387.72max) MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)
6318 MB/s +22%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
5181 (4323.23min - 5181.35max) MB/s
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (4897 - 5181, n=3)
5077 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5018 (4387.69min - 5018.48max) MB/s -3%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6770 (6323.06min - 6770.24max) MB/s +40%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5250 (5191.5min - 5250.22max) MB/s +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5234 (5167.11min - 5234.47max) MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4949 (4932.28min - 4948.61max) MB/s +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)
4859 MB/s +1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4821 (4606.6min - 4820.72max) MB/s
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (4775 - 4821, n=3)
4804 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3288 (3266.73min - 3287.63max) MB/s -32%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
92.7 (91.49min - 92.68max) MB/s +96%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
83.5 (82.8min - 83.52max) MB/s +77%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s +40%
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (47.2 - 81.5, n=3)
61.6 MB/s +31%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
55.3 (53.37min - 55.32max) MB/s +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
54.3 (54.05min - 54.29max) MB/s +15%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
51.3 (50.48min - 51.25max) MB/s +9%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
47.2 (45.9min - 47.16max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
343 (338.95min - 343.03max) MB/s +1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
340 (329.38min - 339.78max) MB/s
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (298 - 340, n=3)
323 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
251 (249.74min - 251.16max) MB/s -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)
223 MB/s -34%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
198.1 (195.9min - 198.06max) MB/s -42%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
143.7 (139.68min - 143.66max) MB/s -58%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
128.1 (123.78min - 128.05max) MB/s -62%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4923 (4891.68min - 4922.98max) MB/s +49%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4055 (4044.11min - 4055.48max) MB/s +23%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3630 (3471.35min - 3629.9max) MB/s +10%
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (3293 - 3485, n=3)
3360 MB/s +2%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3302 (3194.22min - 3302.44max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)
2565 MB/s -22%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1189 (1150.47min - 1189.25max) MB/s -64%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
900 (832.36min - 900.34max) MB/s -73%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4394 (3486.17min - 4394.19max) MB/s +28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3542 (3491.17min - 3541.69max) MB/s +3%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3443 (3007.99min - 3443.05max) MB/s
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (3074 - 3443, n=3)
3237 MB/s -6%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3003 (2991.33min - 3002.71max) MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)
2128 MB/s -38%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
480 (467.08min - 480.46max) MB/s -86%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 (405.08min - 437.5max) MB/s -87%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10265 Points +17%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
8778 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8364 Points -5%
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (7807 - 8778, n=3)
8252 Points -6%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8059 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)
6733 Points -23%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5138 Points -41%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4092 Points -53%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4721 Points +50%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3233 Points +3%
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (3051 - 3323, n=3)
3175 Points +1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3152 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3005 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)
2440 Points -23%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1571 Points -50%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1458 Points -54%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4652 Points +16%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4006 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3573 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3543 Points -12%
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (3133 - 4006, n=3)
3443 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)
3109 Points -22%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3029 Points -24%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1792 Points -55%
Seq Read
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5625.54 MB/s +35%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5592.15 MB/s +34%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5355.36 MB/s +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)
4948 MB/s +19%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4797.97 MB/s +15%
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (4161 - 4215, n=3)
4196 MB/s +1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4161.31 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4011.35 MB/s -4%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4668.7 MB/s +5%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4431.76 MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4431.18 MB/s 0%
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (4234 - 4432, n=3)
4314 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3950.35 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)
3759 MB/s -15%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3587.95 MB/s -19%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2390.9 MB/s -46%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
82.62 MB/s +34%
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (61.9 - 98.9, n=3)
79.7 MB/s +29%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
76.81 MB/s +24%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
71.52 MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)
65 MB/s +5%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
61.86 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
49.86 MB/s -19%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
49.79 MB/s -20%
4K Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
306.26 MB/s +8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
283.44 MB/s
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (255 - 284, n=3)
274 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
213.76 MB/s -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)
212 MB/s -25%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
191.79 MB/s -32%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
179.15 MB/s -37%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
171.2 MB/s -40%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3164.36 MB/s +18%
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (2551 - 2803, n=3)
2676 MB/s 0%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2673.76 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2615.17 MB/s -2%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2374.63 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)
1874 MB/s -30%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1120.03 MB/s -58%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
845.48 MB/s -68%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3878.76 MB/s +18%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3279.44 MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2951.09 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2933.74 MB/s -11%
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (2421 - 3279, n=3)
2738 MB/s -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)
2524 MB/s -23%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2478.06 MB/s -24%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1381.35 MB/s -58%
Access Time Read
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.09 ms * -2%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
0.088 ms *
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (0.048 - 0.088, n=3)
0.06767 ms * +23%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.064 ms * +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)
0.05551 ms * +37%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.054 ms * +39%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.047 ms * +47%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.042 ms * +52%
Access Time Write
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.073 ms * -387%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.07 ms * -367%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.059 ms * -293%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)
0.04751 ms * -217%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.02 ms * -33%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
0.015 ms *
Average Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
  (0.015 - 0.015, n=3)
0.015 ms * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.012 ms * +20%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
Aorus 16X 2024 Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5164 (4823.45-5192.86)
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7063 (6446.85-7107.46)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6318 (5640.08-6341.89)
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5009 (4724.46-5021.44)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB: Ø7081 (6350.81-7114.2)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5723 (3286.38-6614.84)

图形卡

技嘉将已安装的 GeForce RTX 4070的最大 TGP 为 140 瓦(115 瓦 + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost)--Nvidia 并未规定更大的功率。该 GPU 有 8 GB VRAM(GDDR6)可用--对于当今的需求来说有点偏低。其基准测试结果略高于 RTX-4070 的平均水平(标准),更强大的配置文件最多只能带来微弱的提升。在 dGPU 和 Optimus 之间切换无需重启系统。支持高级 Optimus。

Fire Strike (标准,与电源连接)
Fire Strike (标准,与电源连接)
Fire Strike (创造者,与电源连接)
Fire Strike (创造者,与电源连接)
Fire Strike (涡轮增压,与电源连接)
Fire Strike (涡轮增压,与电源连接)
Fire Strike (游戏,与电源连接)
Fire Strike (游戏,与电源连接)
Fire Strike (会议,与主电源连接)
Fire Strike (会议,与主电源连接)
Fire Strike (静音节能型,与电源连接)
Fire Strike (静音节能型,与电源连接)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
99 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
99 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
98.5 pt
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
96.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
92.6 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
92 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
90.1 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
87.6 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
44546 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)
43891 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
43689 Points +5%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
42296 Points +2%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
41457 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
41432 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=64)
40454 Points -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
39424 Points -5%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)
31461 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
31105 Points +7%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
30932 Points +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
30438 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
29892 Points +3%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
29156 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12242 - 33451, n=68)
29100 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
28461 Points -2%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13336 Points +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
13166 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)
13142 Points +9%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12997 Points +8%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12048 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
11972 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5012 - 13391, n=66)
11617 Points -4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
11181 Points -7%
3DMark 11 Performance
35473 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
23487 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
12612 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
23 Seconds * -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 30, n=65)
21.5 Seconds * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
21 Seconds * -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)
20.8 Seconds * -4%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
20 Seconds * -0%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
20 Seconds *
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
19 Seconds * +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
19 Seconds * +5%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 181, n=67)
40.2 Seconds * -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=184, last 2 years)
36.9 Seconds * -15%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
36 Seconds * -13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
34 Seconds * -6%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
33 Seconds * -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
32 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
32 Seconds * -0%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
32 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
326 Seconds * -44%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
298 Seconds * -31%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
296 Seconds * -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)
293 Seconds * -29%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
291 Seconds * -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 440, n=64)
289 Seconds * -27%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
227 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
205 Seconds * +10%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 237138, n=188, last 2 years)
127665 Points +1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
126537 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
120585 Points -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
118601 Points -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
117251 Points -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (17391 - 132836, n=65)
114214 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
112841 Points -11%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
111153 Points -12%
Vulkan Score 5.5
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
88210 Points +17%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
75575 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (7995 - 163089, n=119, last 2 years)
72853 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (8146 - 102618, n=36)
67413 Points -11%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
65414 Points -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
62491 Points -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
58476 Points -23%
Geekbench 6.3
GPU Vulkan
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
110951 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
109205 Points +21%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
107747 Points +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
105334 Points +16%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
90584 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (4286 - 196201, n=106, last 2 years)
82352 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7760 - 120033, n=38)
70796 Points -22%
GPU OpenCL
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
120852 Points +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
120468 Points 0%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
120176 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
117792 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (4321 - 207373, n=111, last 2 years)
116410 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
115718 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (85488 - 129836, n=41)
114102 Points -5%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
112875 Points -6%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=112, last 2 years)
2199 mpaths +27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
1868 mpaths +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1749 mpaths +1%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1738 mpaths 0%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
1737 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (171 - 1872, n=37)
1650 mpaths -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
1643 mpaths -5%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=114, last 2 years)
1580 mpaths +26%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
1333 mpaths +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1259 mpaths 0%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1259 mpaths 0%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
1256 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (120 - 1356, n=37)
1195 mpaths -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
1180 mpaths -6%
CPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
19077 mpaths +9%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
17465 mpaths
Average of class Gaming
  (3562 - 26944, n=116, last 2 years)
15186 mpaths -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9339 - 20388, n=36)
14421 mpaths -17%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12776 mpaths -27%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12383 mpaths -29%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
11943 mpaths -32%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=150, last 2 years)
715 mpaths +22%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
675 mpaths +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (434 - 686, n=49)
603 mpaths +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
596 mpaths +2%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
587 mpaths
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
579 mpaths -1%
CPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
28791 ksamples +8%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
26677 ksamples
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
21634 ksamples -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (5413 - 37629, n=150, last 2 years)
21586 ksamples -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12638 - 35173, n=49)
21145 ksamples -21%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
18346 ksamples -31%
SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Gaming
  (47.1 - 515, n=20, last 2 years)
313 fps +15%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
271.1 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (250 - 271, n=5)
258 fps -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
253.3 fps -7%
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.3 - 231, n=25, last 2 years)
38.9 fps +59%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
24.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (21.4 - 25.5, n=8)
23.2 fps -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
22.1 fps -9%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 59.9, n=25, last 2 years)
41.2 fps +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32.2 - 39, n=8)
35.8 fps +3%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
34.8 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
32.2 fps -7%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming
  (99.8 - 687, n=24, last 2 years)
430 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (355 - 472, n=8)
408 fps +3%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
396 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
390 fps -2%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Average of class Gaming
  (21.3 - 76.5, n=25, last 2 years)
49.8 fps +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41.3 - 44, n=8)
42.2 fps 0%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
42 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
41.3 fps -2%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
121.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (95.9 - 122, n=8)
113.4 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
110.7 fps -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 141.9, n=25, last 2 years)
109.8 fps -9%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.8 - 117.2, n=25, last 2 years)
75 fps +12%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
66.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (61.4 - 70.2, n=8)
66 fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
64 fps -4%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 221, n=25, last 2 years)
128.9 fps +32%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
99.7 fps +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (95.3 - 102, n=8)
98.5 fps +1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
97.8 fps

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

图形核心允许在高至最高设置下进行 QHD 游戏。这使得帧率高于之前 RTX 4070 的平均水平(标准);更强大的配置文件最多只能带来微小的提升。使用 DLSS 3 和 "帧生成 "功能,还可以在更高分辨率下实现包括光线追踪在内的最高设置,但仅限于支持这些功能的游戏。

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
100 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
89.3 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.8 pt
Alienware m16 R2 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.4 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
82.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 -1!
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
80.7 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
133.7 (126min) fps +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years)
128.5 fps +5%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
122 fps
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
121.3 (115min) fps -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
120.7 (114min) fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
118.4 (103min) fps -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
114 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.8 - 133.7, n=56)
112.5 fps -8%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
127.2 (5.17min, 83.3P1) fps +19%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
125.4 (4.46min, 83.3P1) fps +17%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.8 (21.8min, 83.3P1) fps +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)
113.8 fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (48.3 - 141.6, n=60)
111.2 fps +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
107.2 (4.31min, 71.4P1) fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
131 fps +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
121.9 fps +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)
120.1 fps +8%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.3 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.5 fps +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41 - 131.9, n=62)
111.1 fps 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
108.3 fps -3%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
234 (27.8min, 175.8P1) fps +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)
229 fps +12%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
219 (38.5min, 163.7P1) fps +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
214 (24.3min, 160.5P1) fps +5%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
204 (69.2min, 153P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
202 (47.3min, 151P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (76.3 - 234, n=62)
196.3 fps -4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
194.2 (59.2min, 144.5P1) fps -5%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
185.3 (161min) fps +2%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
180.9 (156.5min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
162.8 (140.6min) fps -10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
154.1 (133.3min) fps -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)
151.2 fps -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (89.7 - 191.2, n=64)
148.1 fps -18%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
139.7 (120.9min) fps -23%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
130 (113.9min) fps -28%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137.6 fps +9%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.4 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.5 fps -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
114.9 fps -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)
108.5 fps -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (52.1 - 147.9, n=66)
104.6 fps -17%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.8 fps -28%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
80.7 fps -36%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
XMG Pro 15 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89.5 (53min) fps +18%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.01)
87.9 (48.6min) fps +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
87.1 (52.5min) fps +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=80, last 2 years)
86.5 fps +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
86.3 (61.1min) fps +14%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02, Turbo)
84 (35.6min) fps +11%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
83.1 (28.4min) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (30.7 - 90.7, n=35)
79.4 fps +5%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
75.8 (32.9min) fps
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.9 - 77.7, n=55, last 2 years)
45.5 fps +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
44.8 (15.7min) fps +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
43.6 (33.4min) fps +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02, Turbo)
43.4 (16.1min) fps +6%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
42.4 (28.4min) fps +4%
XMG Pro 15 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41.2 (30min) fps +1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
40.9 (21.5min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (19.1 - 46.8, n=20)
40.6 fps -1%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Gaming
  (24.8 - 110, n=71, last 2 years)
65.2 fps +32%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.01)
57.1 (30.3min) fps +16%
XMG Pro 15 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
55.4 (43min) fps +12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
52.8 (33.2min) fps +7%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
52.7 (40.5min) fps +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02, Turbo)
51.9 (32.6min) fps +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
51.8 (39.2min) fps +5%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
49.4 (29.5min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24.8 - 57.1, n=33)
49.2 fps 0%
Horizon Forbidden West
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.1 (30.5min, 44P0.1, 51.9P1) fps
XMG Pro 15 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70.3 (55.5min, 56.1P0.1, 58.3P1) fps -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.7 - 125.2, n=10, last 2 years)
66.7 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (53.2 - 76.7, n=9)
65.3 fps -8%
2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (24.1 - 98, n=9, last 2 years)
57.1 fps +5%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
54.5 (41.8min, 42.4P0.1, 45P1) fps
XMG Pro 15 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
54 (44.2min, 45.2P0.1, 47.1P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (40.3 - 59.1, n=8)
52 fps -5%
Alone in the Dark
1920x1080 High Preset
XMG Pro 15 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
178 (72min) fps +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (125.8 - 196.5, n=5)
167.4 fps +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (16.7 - 216, n=6, last 2 years)
156.4 fps +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
151.1 (31.4min, 49.8P0.1, 75.8P1) fps
2560x1440 Cinematic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (64.7 - 133.6, n=4, last 2 years)
91.6 fps +42%
XMG Pro 15 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72 (29min) fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (37.4 - 76.6, n=5)
65.2 fps +1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64.7 (22.8min, 23.8P0.1, 30.9P1) fps
Skull & Bones
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81 (30min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (31 - 118, n=12, last 2 years)
78.2 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (75 - 81, n=3)
77.7 fps -4%
XMG Pro 15 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75 (39min) fps -7%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (37 - 98, n=8, last 2 years)
71.6 fps +14%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63 (24min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (56 - 63, n=3)
59.3 fps -6%
XMG Pro 15 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
59 (35min) fps -6%
Last Epoch
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
XMG Pro 15 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
140 (22.6min, 100.3P0.1, 107.9P1) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (133.8 - 140, n=2)
136.9 fps +2%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
133.8 (14.8min, 64.3P0.1, 104P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 204, n=9, last 2 years)
96.9 fps -28%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (15.3 - 145.5, n=5, last 2 years)
86.3 fps +7%
XMG Pro 15 E23
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81.1 (21.3min, 55.2P0.1, 66.3P1) fps +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (80.4 - 81.1, n=2)
80.8 fps 0%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
80.4 (13min, 23.6P0.1, 62.3P1) fps

为了检查设备的帧速率是否在较长时间内基本保持稳定,我们以全高清分辨率和最高质量设置运行了约 60 分钟游戏 Witcher 3 。游戏角色没有移动。帧速率没有明显下降。

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Aorus 16X 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; FPS: Ø118.6 (114-123)
Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø110 (97-116)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø113.2 (109-118)
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø111.2 (105-118)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø116.1 (103-121)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø118.3 (114-125)
Witcher 3 标准
Witcher 3 标准
Witcher 3 (涡轮)
Witcher 3 (涡轮)
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 187.5 187 176.5 107.2 90.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 435 338 223 122 88.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 233 208 199.1 180.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 176.6 139.1 111.5 85.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 194.4 163 126.4
Far Cry 5 (2018) 184 124 114 109 98
Strange Brigade (2018) 455 277 233 204 136.2
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 90.2 81.6 76.9 75.8 49.4
Skull & Bones (2024) 107 101 94 81 63
Last Epoch (2024) 169.7 156 155.9 133.8 80.4
Alone in the Dark (2024) 185.9 157.3 151.1 124.7 64.7
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) 92.3 77.3 73.4 71.1 54.5

排放 - Aorus 笔记本电脑的温度并不高

噪音排放

在满载情况下,笔记本电脑产生的噪音最高可达 55 dB(A)。通过 "会议"和"节能静音"能源配置文件,可以获得更安静的整体体验--但会牺牲部分性能。此外,还可通过四个风扇配置文件(在技嘉控制中心内)控制风扇活动。如果需要,您还可以创建自定义风扇曲线。在闲置和日常使用(办公、上网)时,笔记本电脑一般运行安静,有时甚至是静音运行。有时,风扇会开始快速转动。

Noise Level

Idle
26 / 32 / 38 dB(A)
Load
54 / 55 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs205249.142.240.2442539.544.438.241.540.13145.151.352.951.450.74034.436.237.336.535.35030.733.647.744.242.963433230.329.443.48049.822.526.224.751.210028.51827.721.430.912528.821.927.729.233.316030.624.929.125.533.720031.325.128.323.532.725033.120.325.221.23531533.919.223.516.234.940038.322.126.51438.850040.622.927.414.341.663040.62327.515.741.180040.721.826.412.541100042.321.726.911.741.9125043.622.628.211.644160045.522.327.811.945.720004319.224.812.343.3250042.418.223.812.843.1315043.119.325.113.343.5400043.116.42714.143.8500042.615.319.713.742.9630042.614.918.51443.5800040.414.516.413.840.81000036.513.414.813.237.71250032.313.214.712.933.81600026.812.814.312.428.1SPL54.53237.626.554.9N10.11.62.80.810.6median 40.6median 19.3median 26.4median 13.8median 41Delta5.63.63.73.54.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAorus 16X 2024
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise
12%
9%
4%
9%
10%
off / environment *
26
24.7
5%
24
8%
27.9
-7%
25
4%
23.9
8%
Idle Minimum *
26
25.3
3%
29
-12%
28.5
-10%
26
-0%
24.3
7%
Idle Average *
32
25.3
21%
30
6%
29.8
7%
29
9%
24.3
24%
Idle Maximum *
38
25.3
33%
31
18%
29.8
22%
34
11%
28.9
24%
Load Average *
54
31.7
41%
45
17%
34.8
36%
43
20%
45.8
15%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50
53.8
-8%
44
12%
57.1
-14%
48
4%
51
-2%
Load Maximum *
55
62
-13%
47
15%
57.3
-4%
48
13%
56.6
-3%

* ... smaller is better

温度

压力测试和 Witcher 3测试只导致笔记本电脑稍微发热。在某些情况下,我们测得的数值在 40 摄氏度上下。在日常使用中(办公、上网),数值基本保持在绿色区域,但高于平均值。

Max. Load
 38 °C39 °C41 °C 
 37 °C38 °C35 °C 
 28 °C26 °C24 °C 
Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 34 °C
41 °C41 °C41 °C
33 °C33 °C31 °C
27 °C25 °C27 °C
Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 33.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  51 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat
-10%
-8%
21%
-19%
-7%
Maximum Upper Side *
41
44.8
-9%
49
-20%
40
2%
55
-34%
43.8
-7%
Maximum Bottom *
41
48
-17%
63
-54%
33.6
18%
66
-61%
55.4
-35%
Idle Upper Side *
37
37.2
-1%
30
19%
26.6
28%
33
11%
32.8
11%
Idle Bottom *
38
42
-11%
29
24%
24.4
36%
35
8%
36
5%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

极限压力测试场景(Prime95 和 Furmark 连续运行)检查了系统在满负荷情况下的稳定性。CPU 时钟在 1 至 3 GHz 之间波动了很长时间,但一段时间后又稳定在较低水平。图形核心高速运行。

Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

发言人

笔记本电脑的立体声扬声器整体音效不错。使用耳机或外置扬声器可以获得更好的音效体验。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.238.12541.5373151.448.54036.534.55044.244.46329.432.98024.739.210021.449.112529.258.216025.563.320023.564.625021.26731516.267.24001470.650014.377.663015.777.880012.574.7100011.770.2125011.666.9160011.970.5200012.369.3250012.872.9315013.370.8400014.176.8500013.770.963001465.5800013.868.21000013.270.11250012.971.61600012.465.8SPL26.584.5N0.865.9median 13.8median 70.1Delta3.53.138.634.438.631.726.331.728.225.728.227.822.627.82825.52826.425.426.429.226.929.228.825.928.830.419.430.444.917.844.957.518.657.565.617.165.66619.56668.917.568.969.814.769.870.712.670.774.711.974.773.61173.670.810.570.87010.37070.610.670.66910.96966.411.566.465.311.865.368.112.368.167.812.767.871.912.771.973.212.673.269.612.769.666.512.466.582.424.782.457.70.657.7median 68.9median 12.6median 68.95.63.15.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus 16X 2024Alienware m16 R2
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Aorus 16X 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Alienware m16 R2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 拥有出色续航能力的游戏笔记本电脑

耗电量

对于已安装的硬件而言,该设备的功耗处于正常水平。虽然 Witcher 3 测试运行时功耗保持不变,但在压力测试的前几分钟,笔记本电脑的功耗波动很大。电源装置(240 瓦)的功率足够大。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 /  Watt
Idledarkmidlight 13 / 18 / 35 Watt
Load midlight 138 / 222 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
12%
7%
17%
23%
5%
Idle Minimum *
13
8.1
38%
10
23%
6.2
52%
8
38%
Idle Average *
18
13
28%
18
-0%
21.8
-21%
12
33%
Idle Maximum *
35
40.3
-15%
32
9%
22
37%
23
34%
Load Average *
138
79
43%
128
7%
59.2
57%
94
32%
Witcher 3 ultra *
172.6
188.1
-9%
148.4
14%
189.7
-10%
181.5
-5%
Load Maximum *
222
254.9
-15%
242
-9%
247.8
-12%
215
3%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Aorus 16X 2024; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø172.6 (167.4-181.2)
Aorus 16X 2024; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø174.2 (112.2-227)
Aorus 16X 2024; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø18.4 (12.8-34.8)

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Aorus 16X 2024; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø147.2 (140.8-189.5)
Aorus 16X 2024; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø183.2 (174.2-187)
Aorus 16X 2024; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø162.1 (152.6-169.2)
Aorus 16X 2024; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø165.8 (148.9-169.3)
Aorus 16X 2024; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø26.2 (22-35.2)

运行时间

在 WLAN 测试(使用脚本访问网站)和视频测试(循环播放短片 Big Buck Bunny(H.264 编码,FHD))中,16 英寸设备的运行时间分别为 8:01 小时和 9:01 小时。总而言之,Aorus 16X 的表现非常出色。不过,没有一台对比电脑的续航能力接近华硕 A17。

Aorus 16X 的电池容量为 99.2 Wh。
Aorus 16X 的电池容量为 99.2 Wh。
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
12h 33min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 123)
8h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 01min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 40min
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-13%
-39%
25%
-16%
-40%
-21%
Reader / Idle
753
758
1%
1180
57%
403
-46%
H.264
541
WiFi v1.3
481
483
0%
292
-39%
548
14%
405
-16%
290
-40%
Load
100
60
-40%
103
3%
65
-35%

Pros

+ 明亮的 QHD+ 屏幕,16:10 格式(165 Hz、G-Sync、杜比视界)
+ 高系统性能
+ 高级 Optimus
+ 两个固态硬盘,每个 1 TB(PCIe 4,M.2-2280)
+ 可更换/扩展内存
+ 快速读卡器
+ WiFi 7
+ 雷电 4
+ 电力传输
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 负载时噪音大
- 空转时风扇偶尔转动
- 电源选项不明确

结论:一款全面的中高档游戏笔记本电脑

Aorus 16X (2024),技嘉德国提供的测试样品。
Aorus 16X (2024),技嘉德国提供的测试样品。

Aorus 16X 针对 QHD+ 游戏、流媒体和渲染进行了优化。处理器 酷睿 i9-14900HXGeForce RTX 4070提供了必要的性能。CPU 和图形核心始终以高时钟频率运行。两个快速 PCIe-4 SSD(每个 1 TB)确保了较短的加载时间。

技嘉的 Aorus 16X (2024) 是一款功能强大、装备精良的笔记本电脑,适合游戏玩家和创作者使用,似乎没有任何重大缺陷。

这款笔记本电脑在负载情况下不会特别发热,但会产生相当大的噪音。更安静的运行是以牺牲一定的计算性能为代价的。安装的 IPS 屏幕(16 英寸,2,560 x 1,600 像素,165 Hz)采用适合工作的 16:10 宽高比,给我们留下了良好的印象。它的亮度尤其出色。

两个 USB-C 端口(1 个 Thunderbolt 4 端口、1 个 USB 3.2 Gen 2 端口)可以轻松将笔记本电脑集成到现有的工作场所设置中,并提供更多扩展选项(外置 GPU、扩展坞)。两个端口均可输出 DisplayPort 信号,其中一个端口还支持 Power Delivery。该设备的运行时间令人印象深刻。

Aorus 16X 的替代产品可能是 联想Legion Pro 5 16IRX9.它采用相同的 CPU/GPU 配置,图形性能略胜一筹,但只配备了一个固态硬盘,仍使用 WiFi 6E 模块(Aorus:WiFi 7)。

价格和供应情况

目前,Aorus 16X ASG 在亚马逊的售价为1,949.99 美元

Aorus 16X 2024 - 04/09/2024 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
77 / 98 → 78%
Keyboard
79%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
67 / 80 → 84%
Weight
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Battery
79 / 95 → 84%
Display
91%
Games Performance
99%
Application Performance
95%
Temperature
88 / 95 → 93%
Noise
60 / 90 → 66%
Audio
89%
Camera
46 / 85 → 54%
Average
78%
87%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Aorus 16X (2024) 评测:酷睿 i9 和 RTX 4070 售价 2,000 美元
Sascha Mölck, 2024-04-14 (Update: 2024-04-14)