Notebookcheck Logo

索尼Xperia 1 IV评论。首款具有真正光学变焦、4K OLED和插孔的智能手机

口袋里的单反相机替代品？

索尼的Xperia 1 IV配备了可变变焦镜头，从而在智能手机中利用了真正的光学变焦。除相机外，这款旗舰手机还具有其他不寻常的功能，如状态指示灯、微型SD插槽、耳机插孔和快门按钮。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾

在Xperia 1 III的双长焦镜头之后，索尼在其2022年的旗舰机上又进一步。这款Xperia 1 IV首次在智能手机中使用潜望镜镜头，允许真正的可变光学变焦。与之相比 Galaxy S22 Ultra，索尼手机不仅使用固定焦距进行变焦，而且可以在85毫米和125毫米之间连续放大拍摄对象。

也就是说，Xperia 1 IV提供的不仅仅是卓越的相机硬件。这款日本旗舰机采用6.5英寸21:9的OLED显示屏，具有4K分辨率和120赫兹，支持microSD卡和3.5毫米耳机插孔，与高端智能手机领域的竞争对手相比，它走的路线略有不同。

但Xperia 1 IV确实与竞争对手有一个共同点：价格高。这款索尼智能手机以其 骁龙8代1大体上有12GB内存和256GB存储空间，建议零售价在1250-1399美元之间（取决于你的位置），因此比其 前代产品.在美国，512GB的版本售价为1,599.99美元。

Sony Xperia 1 IV (Xperia 1 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 730
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.50 inch 21:9, 3840 x 1644 pixel 643 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 219 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1TB, exFAT Support , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G: 850, 900, 1800, 1900; 3G: 2.100 (Band 1), 1.900 (Band 2), 1.700 (Band 4), 850 (Band 5), 800 (Band 6), 900 (Band 8), 800 (Band 19); 4G: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66; 5G: n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n77, n78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 165 x 71
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.7, 24mm, 1/1.7", 1.8µm) + 12MP (3.5x-5.2x optical zoom, f/2.3, 85mm, f/2.8, 125mm ) + 12MP ( f/2.2, 16mm) + 0.3MP TOF, camera2API: Level3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.0, 24mm, 1/2.9)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Virtual, USB cable, Sony UI, 24 Months Warranty, widevine L1, SAR value: 0.880W/​kg Head, 0.920W/​kg Body, fanless, waterproof
Weight
185 g
Price
1399 Euro
Links
Sony homepage
Sony notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
87.7 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2022
Sony Xperia 1 IV
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		185 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.50"3840x1644
89.2 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2022
Oppo Find X5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		221 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
89.4 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920		228 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3088x1440
87.6 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2022
Xiaomi 12 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		204 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.73"3200x1440
87.5 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2022
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		204 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"2480x1116
88.6 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Honor Magic4 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		215 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.81"2848x1312

案例--没有缺口的索尼智能手机

白色的索尼Xperia 1 IV
白色的索尼Xperia 1 IV
黑色的索尼Xperia 1 IV
黑色的索尼Xperia 1 IV

Xperia 1 IV的玻璃和金属外壳以其非常好的制造质量给人留下了深刻印象。对于2022年的旗舰智能手机来说，尽管电池容量高达5000毫安时，但Xperia 1 IV相对较轻，只有185克，而且由于其拉长的21:9显示屏，它相当苗条，只有71毫米。然而，8.2毫米薄且通过IP68认证的大猩猩玻璃Victus夹层外壳由于采用平坦的黑色而显得棱角分明，因此与高端领域的其他代表相比，不太符合人体工程学。

平坦的6.5英寸OLED面板受限于薄薄的侧边，但显示屏和设备正面之间的尺寸比仅为84.2%，因为上下显示屏的边缘相当大。例如，三星的Galaxy S22 Ultra，更有效地利用可用的表面，超过90%。至少索尼的旗舰机在正面没有凹槽或打孔。

除了通常的音量和电源按钮，Xperia 1 IV还有一个专门的快门按钮，可以启动相机应用程序，并可用作快门释放。

索尼Xperia 1 IV的紫罗兰色
索尼Xperia 1 IV的紫罗兰色
测试索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机
测试索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机
测试索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机
测试索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机
测试索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机
测试索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机
测试索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机

尺寸比较

❌
165 mm 71 mm 8.2 mm 185 g163.6 mm 74.7 mm 9.15 mm 215 g163.6 mm 74.6 mm 8.66 mm 204 g163.3 mm 77.9 mm 8.9 mm 228 g163.7 mm 73.9 mm 8.5 mm 221 g163.28 mm 73.56 mm 8.41 mm 204 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - Xperia 1 IV，带3.5毫米插孔

凭借其Xperia 1系列，索尼继续走高端手机的不寻常道路。没有其他旗舰智能手机提供由状态LED、3.5毫米耳机插孔和通过microSD卡扩展的内部存储器组成的包装。后者的容量为256GB，尽管由于操作系统和预装应用程序的原因，实际可用存储空间较低，为219GB。

5,000毫安时的电池通过USB 3.2规格的Type-C端口充电，在测试中通过USB OTG识别外部外围设备（如记忆棒）没有问题。此外，USB端口允许图像传输（通过USB-C到HDMI适配器电缆），最高可达4K60。通过Miracast或Google Cast将显示内容无线传输到外部显示器也是可能的。来自流媒体服务的视频内容可以以高清质量观看，因为该智能手机已经经历了Widevine L1的认证过程。

箱子的左侧
箱子的左侧
箱体右侧（按钮）
箱体右侧（按钮）
箱子的底部（USB端口，麦克风）
箱子的底部（USB端口，麦克风）
外壳顶部（3.5毫米插孔，麦克风）。
外壳顶部（3.5毫米插孔，麦克风）。

微型SD卡读卡器

集成的microSD插槽可以掌握当前的SDHC和SDXC标准，最高可达1TB。结合我们的AV PRO V60参考卡，microSD在跨平台磁盘测试中的性能是有限的；尤其是读取率很低。Xperia 1 IV的复制速度不到15MB/s，也低于平均水平。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Sony Xperia Pro-I
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
22.7 MB/s +54%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
14.7 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø27 (20.2-30.1)
Sony Xperia Pro-I Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.8 (29.7-46.1)
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.4 (28.4-71)
Sony Xperia Pro-I Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78.6 (58.6-120)

软件--索尼智能手机与Android 12

Xperia 1 IV搭载了Android 12，据索尼称，在最初发布后的至少三年内，将提供安全更新和两个Android 升级。考虑到价格范围，这是非常少的。三星的顶级机型例如，应该在四年内收到新的Android 操作系统，甚至在未来有五年的安全更新。

像往常一样，这家日本制造商将Android 系统与它的内部用户界面，即索尼UI，5.71版相结合。在审查期间，安全补丁是从2022年6月开始的。

索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾
索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾
索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾
索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾

通信与GNSS - Xperia 1 IV with WiFi 6E

对于家庭无线局域网，Xperia 1 IV提供了快速的802.11ax标准和WiFi 6E，这确保了我们测量中非常高的传输速率。我们结合华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器，在6GHz频段注册了超过1700MBit/s。这款智能手机在5GHz频率范围内也能达到非常强大的1600MBit/s。这些数值总体上是稳定的，即使在我们的测量中启动阶段比较低。

除了快速的WLAN，索尼的旗舰机还利用了蓝牙5.2、双SIM卡和5G（但不支持毫米波）以及用于非接触支付的NFC芯片。在5G标准之上，Xperia 1 IV还支持接入总共24个LTE频段--包括28频段在内的德语区所有相关LTE频率都被覆盖。这款Xperia手机也为出国旅行做好了准备，比如在美国。

Networking
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1226 (min: 590) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1590 (min: 1449) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1748 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1459 (min: 723) MBit/s ∼86%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
820 (min: 799) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
890 (min: 433) MBit/s ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
716 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
521 (min: 311) MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1704 (min: 852) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1702 (min: 1642) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1465 (min: 1307) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1214 (min: 516) MBit/s ∼76%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
900 (min: 844) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
831 (min: 428) MBit/s ∼52%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1369 (min: 720) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1499 (min: 1195) MBit/s ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
719 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
736 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1444 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1377 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼81%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Sony Xperia 1 IV; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1720 (870-1823)
Sony Xperia 1 IV; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1434 (723-1535)
Sony Xperia 1 IV; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1206 (590-1346)
Sony Xperia 1 IV; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1590 (1449-1712)
在室内定位
在室内定位
在户外定位
在户外定位

为了更好地评估日常使用中的定位精度，我们带着索尼智能手机进行了一次短途旅行，并与Garmin Venue 2串联记录了路线，以进行比较。Xperia 1 IV的定位模块使用从GPS（L1）、GLONASS、QZSS到Galileo（E1）的卫星系统进行定位，但只是单频的。基于卫星的补充系统SBAS也开始发挥作用

索尼旗舰机的定位能力并不总是完美的。对于高端智能手机来说，GPS记录的详细视图中的偏差是相当大的，所以经常可以看到轻微的不准确。但这种偏差对于汽车导航来说应该不是一个大问题。

索尼Xperia 1 IV VS. Garmin Venu 2
索尼Xperia 1 IV VS. Garmin Venu 2

电话和语音质量 - 索尼Xperia 1 IV双卡双待功能

索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾
索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾

Xperia 1 IV的语音质量没有什么可批评的。声音再现得很清楚，我们的对话伙伴也认为它们很清晰。需要双SIM卡功能的用户，除了物理nanoSIM卡外，还可以将eSIM卡连接到索尼的旗舰机上。

由于有了Wi-Fi通话功能，Xperia Phone可以在移动接收受限时通过Wi-Fi网络进行通话。此外，还可以通过LTE网络使用VoLTE功能进行通话。

相机 - Xperia 1 IV配备了三重摄像头

索尼Xperia 1 IV的人像模式
索尼Xperia 1 IV的人像模式

拥有内部IMX663的1200万像素前置摄像头可以拍出可靠的自拍，但它们相对模糊。曝光功能不好，特别是在人像模式下，图像的明亮区域曝光过度。此外，主体显得非常强烈的 "过滤"（即 "更漂亮"）的前作品。

IMX557被安装在主摄像头中，正如在 前代产品.镜头是光学稳定的，在日光下提供良好的效果，即使被摄对象被大量地调整。在黑暗的环境中，照片被合理地照亮，但有很多噪音，图像清晰度不是很明显--对于这个价格范围来说，这不是真正的理想。另一方面，图像质量仍然可以通过非常广泛的相机软件进行优化。与Xperia 1 III一样，目前的Xperia旗舰机不仅提供了大量的参数调整，还提供了众所周知的Alpha相机功能，如带有实时物体跟踪的眼睛自动对焦和20帧/秒的连续HDR拍摄。

索尼旗舰机的亮点显然是85毫米和125毫米之间无损变焦的可变潜望镜光学系统。可变长焦镜头背后是一个光学稳定的1/3.5英寸传感器，在3.5倍和5.2倍的放大率之间无级工作。然而，我们对图像质量印象不深。锐度可以好得多，细节也不突出。即使是 iPhone 13 Pro5倍混合变焦（3倍光学变焦）也比Xperia 1 IV的测试对象产生更清晰的图片。

Xperia 1 IV的16毫米超广角摄像头具有良好的动态效果和坚实的锐度水平。然而，带有EIS的相机光学元件也产生了一些图像缺陷，其他高端智能手机在细节方面提供了更多的东西。

索尼旗舰机的突出之处在于摄像，因为所有三个镜头都允许以UHD质量录制高达120帧的视频，而且前置摄像头现在允许拍摄4K HDR视频。Xperia 1 IV还提供了Xperia Pro-I中已知的Videography Pro应用程序，以获得更专业的视频和一系列的调整设置。你也可以在运行中的视频录制过程中切换镜头，但用主摄像头和超广角摄像头拍摄的对象比用潜望镜镜头拍摄的对象显示得更温馨。

超广角
广角
3.5倍变焦
5.2倍变焦
15.6倍变焦（最大）
索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾
索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾
索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾
索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾
索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angleWide angleLow LightUltra wide angleZoom 5x
orginal image
click to load images

我们使用ColorChecker passport来检查背面1200万像素主摄像头在受控照明条件下的色彩校准。我们分析了在标准化条件下与实际参考色的色彩表现--一次是在全影棚照明下，一次是在1勒克斯的光线强度下。

对于一款智能手机来说，颜色的再现非常好。没有出现严重的缺陷：只有两个超过10的DeltaE偏差。然而，白平衡仍有改进的余地，黑色调也有灰雾。

ColorChecker
6.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
0.5 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Sony Xperia 1 IV: 6.23 ∆E min: 0.48 - max: 10.29 ∆E
ColorChecker
27 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
54.5 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
55 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
41 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
58.5 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Sony Xperia 1 IV: 37.51 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 58.53 ∆E

配件和保修 - 索尼智能手机不含电源适配器

Xperia 1 IV的配套风格盖板
Xperia 1 IV的配套风格盖板

索尼没有在购买其旗舰智能手机时提供配套的30瓦电源适配器（建议零售价：约50美元）。一条USB线和通常的信息资料都包括在内。与Xperia Pro-I类似，Vlog Monitor（建议零售价：约200美元）作为Xperia 1 IV的配件提供，有了它，后置摄像头就可以用来拍摄视频了。此外，制造商的主页还提供了一个带有支架的配套风格的盖子（建议零售价：约35美元）和一个带有无线遥控器的录音手柄（建议零售价：约200美元）。

索尼在德国为Xperia 1 IV提供24个月的保修。这可能因地区而异，所以在购买前一定要向你的供应商查询。

输入设备和操作 - 索尼智能手机，120赫兹

6.5英寸OLED显示屏上的输入迅速而准确地实现，直到触摸屏的角落。120赫兹的高刷新率也确保了滚动时图像的流畅变化。内置的振动马达提供了良好的触觉反馈，使打字非常愉快。

Xperia 1 IV在OLED屏幕下方没有光学或基于超声波的指纹传感器。相反，手指可以放在电源按钮上，生物识别功能迅速且非常可靠。没有通过前置摄像头的面部识别解锁选项。据推测，索尼认为通过2D方法的FaceUnlock功能是不安全的。

索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾
索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾
索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾

显示屏 - 带有 "4K "面板的Xperia 1 IV

子像素网格的表示方法
子像素网格的表示方法

Xperia 1 IV拥有一个6.5英寸OLED屏幕，分辨率为3840x1644，最大刷新率为120赫兹。想要节省能源的用户也可以在60赫兹下运行索尼的旗舰机。然而，Xperia 1 IV不提供自适应调整，如LTPO面板，这对运行时间有负面影响。

不仅是超过600 ppi的像素密度，而且实现的亮度也非常好。这款来自索尼的高端智能手机在全白显示的情况下平均达到890cd/m²。然而，在APL18的测量中，这略微下降到870 cd/m²--一个 三星Galaxy S22 Ultra在这里达到了1,788 cd/m²。因此，Xperia 1 IV的面板对于渲染HDR内容来说是足够明亮的，但不是最适合的。

由于采用了OLED技术，我们观察到屏幕的闪烁在161和481赫兹之间变化。在设置中似乎没有直流调光模式。

896
cd/m²		882
cd/m²		907
cd/m²
898
cd/m²		890
cd/m²		903
cd/m²
898
cd/m²		893
cd/m²		909
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 909 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 897.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.88 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 890 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Sony Xperia 1 IV
OLED, 3840x1644, 6.5"		Oppo Find X5 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.8"		Xiaomi 12 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"		ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.8"		Honor Magic4 Pro
OLED, 2848x1312, 6.8"
Screen
-2%
6%
-12%
-53%
-68%
Brightness middle
890
746
-16%
1077
21%
959
8%
682
-23%
956
7%
Brightness
897
744
-17%
1093
22%
977
9%
683
-24%
959
7%
Brightness Distribution
97
97
0%
97
0%
96
-1%
94
-3%
94
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.9
0.9
-0%
1.2
-33%
1.1
-22%
1.8
-100%
2.4
-167%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.4
1.6
33%
2
17%
3.1
-29%
4.7
-96%
5.2
-117%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
1.6
-14%
1.3
7%
1.9
-36%
2.4
-71%
3.3
-136%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.23 99%
2.37 93%
2.22 99%
2.16 102%
2.26 97%
CCT
6320 103%
6499 100%
6526 100%
6498 100%
6634 98%
6804 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 480.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 480.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 480.5 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小面板亮度
分钟。
25%的面板亮度
25%
50%的面板亮度
50%
75%的面板亮度
75%
最大的手动面板亮度
100%

用固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置进行一系列的测量

显示设置
显示设置

索尼Xperia 1 IV的用户界面提供了手动白平衡以及著名的 "创造者模式"，该模式与大型BT.2020色彩空间和10位色彩兼容。此外，可单独配置的应用程序的标准模式可以通过BT.2020色域进行扩展，这意味着与其他标准相比，支持人类可感知的明显更大的色谱部分。

我们用CalMAN分析软件检查了OLED面板的色彩校准。在创造者模式下，sRGB色彩空间几乎被完全覆盖。大色彩空间可能只在某些应用中得到支持（视频编辑等）。DeltaE值表示颜色的微小偏差，只有在蓝色调中可以看到最小的差异。灰度的表示也非常准确。


色彩准确性（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：创造者模式）。
色彩准确性（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：创造者模式）。
色彩空间（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：创造者模式）。
色彩空间（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：创造者模式）。
灰度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：创造者模式）。
灰度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：创造者模式）。
色彩饱和度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：创造者模式）。
色彩饱和度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：创造者模式）。

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.07 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5245 ms rise
↘ 0.543 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.75 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5745 ms rise
↘ 1.17 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

这款Xperia手机为户外使用提供了良好的装备。它的高亮度能很好地抵御明亮的环境光线。只有高度反光的表面妨碍了在阳光直射下更好的可读性。不幸的是，Xperia 1 IV没有像S22 Ultra那样的大亮度储备。Galaxy S22 Ultra.

AMOLED显示屏的可视角度稳定性非常好。在平视角度下可以看到典型的亮度下降，我们还注意到OLED面板上有淡淡的紫雾。

索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾
索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾
索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾

性能--采用Snapdragon SoC的索尼智能手机

索尼使用高通Snapdragon 8 Gen 1用于其旗舰机。这款4纳米SoC基于一个由三个集群组成的低温CPU，构成了一个主要核心（Cortex X2）、三个性能核心（Cortex A710）和四个省电单元（Cortex A510）。该CPU单元还可以利用集成的 Adreno 730进行图形处理。

正如预期的那样，Xperia 1 IV中的Snapdragon 8 Gen1在我们的电池基准测试中表现非常好。该智能手机在长时间的负载下没有部署过热保护，即使在夏季温度下也是如此，所有的基准测试都能顺利进行。与配备高通的竞争对手相比，Xperia 1 IV在CPU测试中并不显眼。只有Antutu V9的得分相当低。

Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | AImark
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1257 Points +2%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1237 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1181 - 1298, n=21)
1231 Points 0%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1226 Points -1%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1217 Points -2%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1192 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1154 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
1012 Points -18%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3738 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3560 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (3269 - 3839, n=21)
3548 Points +2%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3489 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3488 Points 0%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3377 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)
3370 Points -3%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3289 Points -6%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
962824 Points +39%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
940036 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (692924 - 1041980, n=18)
928953 Points +34%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
922942 Points +33%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
856953 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=105, last 2 years)
810387 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
704479 Points +2%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
692924 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14283 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
14267 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (10140 - 17025, n=21)
13216 Points -7%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13131 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 26863, n=192, last 2 years)
13052 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
12579 Points -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12144 Points -15%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10745 Points -25%
CrossMark - Overall
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1079 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (749 - 1169, n=14)
993 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
990 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
956 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
942 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2044, n=160, last 2 years)
894 Points -10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
811 Points -18%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
749 Points -24%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7665 Points +5%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7567 Points +4%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7277 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6007 - 7665, n=15)
6951 Points -4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6799 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)
6363 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6319 Points -13%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6007 Points -17%
System
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11338 Points
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10990 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10464 Points -8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10340 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (9273 - 11338, n=15)
10312 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)
10203 Points -10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10006 Points -12%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
9873 Points -13%
Memory
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
8906 Points +22%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7806 Points +7%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7293 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)
6843 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5125 - 8906, n=15)
6787 Points -7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6523 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6212 Points -15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5125 Points -30%
Graphics
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21944 Points +9%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
21737 Points +8%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
21650 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (15216 - 22308, n=15)
20338 Points +1%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20093 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
17343 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17104 Points -15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
15216 Points -24%
Web
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1813 Points +5%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1758 Points +2%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1728 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1669 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1291 - 1888, n=15)
1659 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)
1569 Points -9%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1444 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1434 Points -17%
AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
72572 Points +1057%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1046 - 96317, n=14)
17097 Points +173%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6602 Points +5%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6442 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6273 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6217 Points -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5982 Points -5%

在图形测试中，Xperia 1 IV的数值明显低于AlphaGo的数值。小米12 Pro。由于4K面板，屏幕上的结果会更低，这是可以预期的，但GFX基准的屏幕外数值的巨大差距却不是。索尼旗舰机的废热似乎在这里产生了负面影响。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2585 Points +27%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2523 Points +24%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2513 Points +23%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2188 Points +7%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2038 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1916 Points -6%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2639 Points +27%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2609 Points +26%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2575 Points +24%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2528 Points +22%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2073 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2044 Points -1%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10384 Points +31%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10317 Points +30%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10175 Points +28%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9593 Points +21%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7932 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7288 Points -8%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9927 Points +26%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9826 Points +24%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7901 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7236 Points -8%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4150 Points +82%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4033 Points +77%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3957 Points +73%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3902 Points +71%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3801 Points +66%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2283 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18581 Points +68%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18090 Points +63%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14143 Points +28%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13950 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12972 Points +17%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11082 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10005 Points +67%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9968 Points +67%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9149 Points +53%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9083 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8612 Points +44%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5983 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12123 Points +79%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11556 Points +70%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11000 Points +62%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10958 Points +62%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10415 Points +54%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6784 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25324 Points +66%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25285 Points +66%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20842 Points +37%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20795 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18689 Points +22%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15268 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4296 Points +92%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4153 Points +86%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4120 Points +84%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4085 Points +83%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3981 Points +78%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2237 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +34%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps +31%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 fps +27%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -33%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
439 fps +45%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
426 fps +41%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
425 fps +40%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
380 fps +25%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
303 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps 0%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +43%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps +39%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps +37%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps +29%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -29%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
251 fps +50%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
193 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
187 fps +12%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
182 fps +9%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
181 fps +8%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
167 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps +85%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps +68%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +18%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -7%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
169 fps +51%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps +13%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps +3%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps -1%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps +33%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +21%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -19%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -19%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -25%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps +47%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +8%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +3%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -5%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +2%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -39%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps -47%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps +59%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps +38%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +17%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +3%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps +33%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +18%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -7%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -26%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps +55%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps +29%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps +26%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80 fps +10%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -7%

Xperia 1 IV在日常使用和浏览时给人留下了极好的印象，因为散热问题在这里并不明显。系统性能和基准值是一流的。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
130.189 Points +5%
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)
124.37 Points
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)
121.7 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (72.8 - 134.6, n=16)
107.9 Points -13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
103 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
96.8 Points -22%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
84.1 Points -32%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
77.337 Points -38%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)
139.5 runs/min +25%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
118.5 runs/min +6%
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)
112 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
108 runs/min -4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
104 runs/min -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (64.4 - 129.3, n=16)
104 runs/min -7%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
73.5 runs/min -34%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
65.5 runs/min -42%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)
161 Points
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (79 - 193, n=15)
142.9 Points -11%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
133 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
124 Points -23%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
119 Points -26%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
101 Points -37%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
99 Points -39%
Octane V2 - Total Score
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
47182 Points +2%
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)
46339 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (27730 - 50626, n=17)
42391 Points -9%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
38407 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years)
37643 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
34055 Points -27%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
29750 Points -36%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
27730 Points -40%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)
1551 ms * -83%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
1440.1 ms * -70%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
1330 ms * -57%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
1259 ms * -49%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
1125 ms * -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (814 - 1440, n=16)
1010 ms * -19%
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)
847.4 ms *
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
813.5 ms * +4%

* ... smaller is better

索尼旗舰机的UFS存储的写入和读取速度与其他竞争性高端智能手机相当。尤其是读取速度非常强，几乎达到2000MB/s。

Sony Xperia 1 IVOppo Find X5 ProSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5GXiaomi 12 ProZTE Axon 40 UltraHonor Magic4 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-33%
-10%
11%
-11%
1%
-7%
-1%
Sequential Read 256KB
1982.56
1410
-29%
1653
-17%
1620
-18%
1638.15
-17%
1868.5
-6%
1749 ?(950 - 2037, n=101)
-12%
1863 ?(226 - 4512, n=194, last 2 years)
-6%
Sequential Write 256KB
1262.21
894
-29%
1074
-15%
1465
16%
1065.13
-16%
1367.48
8%
1163 ?(452 - 2004, n=101)
-8%
1446 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=194, last 2 years)
15%
Random Read 4KB
293.95
183.7
-38%
322.3
10%
324.9
11%
313.35
7%
268.76
-9%
286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=101)
-3%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=194, last 2 years)
-5%
Random Write 4KB
334.19
210.4
-37%
273.1
-18%
448.9
34%
273.19
-18%
366.13
10%
319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=102)
-5%
309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=194, last 2 years)
-8%

游戏--索尼智能手机管理60帧

索尼也想到了游戏玩家，提供了240赫兹的触摸采样率，游戏优化器，以及骁龙精英游戏功能。除了基准测试外，我们还用Play Store中的Android 游戏检查了Xperia 1 IV的图形性能。在游戏过程中，我们用GameBench工具记录游戏过程中的帧率。

在良好的显示质量（高清）下，《PUBG Mobile》始终以60帧渲染。一个非常稳定的40帧也使它在UltraHD中可以播放。即使在最高的图形设置下，帧率的强烈下降也不是很明显。然而，Armajet的数值出奇地弱，可能是由于日本制造商的限制。在这里，我们本以为会超过每秒100帧，至少在短时间内是这样。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG动员
PUBG动员
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Sony Xperia 1 IV; Armajet: Ø59.6 (23-61)
Sony Xperia 1 IV; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø58.9 (43-61)
Sony Xperia 1 IV; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø59.1 (44-61)
Sony Xperia 1 IV; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.2 (46-61)
Sony Xperia 1 IV; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.8 (36-42)

排放 - Xperia 1 IV发热

温度

GFX测试没有结果
GFX测试没有结果

机箱的表面温度超过40℃，这一点很明显。我们使用3DMark压力测试来检查Xperia 1 IV的表现是否稳定。在两个测试场景中， 骁龙8代1和高通竞争对手一样，都出现了明显的节流现象。在高负荷情况下，刷新率也会降低，这在长时间游戏过程中可能会成为一个问题。

Max. Load
 39.2 °C38.5 °C38.3 °C 
 40.3 °C37.9 °C37.7 °C 
 34.8 °C38.6 °C35.9 °C 
Maximum: 40.3 °C
Average: 37.9 °C
35.3 °C36.9 °C37.3 °C
33.5 °C37.9 °C37.9 °C
32.9 °C35.1 °C36.1 °C
Maximum: 37.9 °C
Average: 35.9 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 % +5%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.6 %
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.5 % -2%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47.2 % -21%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 % 0%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.5 %
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.8 % -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
% -100%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø10.4 (9.54-15.3)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.64-15.4)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø9.2 (7.76-12.6)
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø36.8 (31.8-53.4)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø41.7 (37.2-59.4)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.2 (25.9-44.2)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø37.8 (27.4-58)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø43.7 (38.1-60.9)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø32.3 (26.8-43.4)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø49.5 (34.8-61.7)
索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾
索尼Xperia 1 IV智能手机回顾

发言人

Xperia 1 IV的立体声扬声器听起来非常好，声音足够大。除了High-Res Audio、DSSE Ultimate和360 Reality Audio之外，还为用户提供了Music Pro，这是一种录音服务，可以用来录制音乐，而无需任何外部设备。然而，就后者而言，基于云的音频功能是基于订阅的。

通过两个正面发射的扬声器输出的音乐几乎没有任何低音，但中音是线性的。在粉红噪声图中可以看到超高音调的凹陷。

Xperia 1 IV的音频插孔提供了一个坚实的噪音水平，SNR值为81。通过蓝牙5.2的音乐播放，可以实现从SBC、AAC aptX、AAC、LHDC到LDAC的编解码。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.640.2252928.73127.832.14025.8305032.535.16322.424.38024.525.610019.433.912516.541.616018.451.320012.851.72509.956.631511.360.840013.163.250011.471.66301173.680011.676.2100012.376.112501277.3160012.473.7200012.274.225001376.3315012.877.3400013.274.9500013.475.2630013.871.5800013.370.11000013.366.71250013.565.51600013.155.5SPL24.986.7N0.669.7median 13median 71.5Delta0.88.23533.93030.921.926.822.832.334.842.524.331.623.23327.831.514.733.720.950.221.250.717.55513.46114.164.113.167.511.571.413.175.511.780.511.879.21380.212.180.612.180.812.380.412.577.41378.113.272.71367.213.768.813.569.314.266.425.190.20.779.8median 13.1median 71.41.511.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSony Xperia 1 IVSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Sony Xperia 1 IV audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--带无线充电的索尼手机

消耗功率

5,000毫安时的电池通过USB-C-PD充电的最大功率为30瓦，无线充电的最大功率为15瓦。功耗不是特别有效，但也没有明显的高。平均为1.7瓦，我们仍然看到有改进的余地，特别是在空转时。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.15 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.06 / 1.71 / 1.89 Watt
Load midlight 4.99 / 8.91 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia 1 IV
5000 mAh		Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh		ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
5000 mAh		Honor Magic4 Pro
4600 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
15%
15%
12%
10%
-1%
-12%
1%
Idle Minimum *
1.06
1.24
-17%
0.58
45%
0.94
11%
0.88
17%
0.87
18%
1.255 ?(0.7 - 3.18, n=15)
-18%
0.885 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Average *
1.71
1.39
19%
0.71
58%
1.24
27%
1.57
8%
2.04
-19%
2.02 ?(1.04 - 4.38, n=15)
-18%
1.451 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Maximum *
1.89
1.42
25%
1.16
39%
1.34
29%
1.6
15%
2.26
-20%
2.21 ?(1.15 - 4.45, n=15)
-17%
1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years)
15%
Load Average *
4.99
3.58
28%
7.07
-42%
5.7
-14%
5.06
-1%
4.97
-0%
5.49 ?(3.58 - 8.04, n=15)
-10%
6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years)
-31%
Load Maximum *
8.91
6.99
22%
11.32
-27%
8.12
9%
7.91
11%
7.46
16%
8.75 ?(6.67 - 11.3, n=15)
2%
9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years)
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø6.98 (1.297-12.1)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø5.27 (0.963-10.9)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.42 (6.85-11.9)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.58 (7.9-10.8)
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.51 (1.406-1.71)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.933 (0.856-1.058)

电池寿命

由于永久的120赫兹和高分辨率，Xperia 1 IV的运行时间不是很长。我们的对比设备在调整后的显示亮度为150cd/m²的情况下，效果最好。在实际的WLAN测试中，索尼的旗舰机在无休止的视频播放过程中，在禁用WLAN模块的情况下，只能管理7小时和10.5小时。

Xperia 1 IV在满负荷的情况下也有低于平均水平的续航能力，但与Xperia 1 IV的区别在于奥普Find X5 Pro或 小米12 Pro的差别并不明显。使用索尼旗舰机拍摄大量照片并在白天偶尔玩玩Android 游戏的用户将无法避免对5000毫安时的电池进行中间充电。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
16h 19min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 103)
7h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 37min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 57min
Sony Xperia 1 IV
5000 mAh		Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh		ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
5000 mAh		Honor Magic4 Pro
4600 mAh
Battery Runtime
55%
77%
57%
103%
47%
Reader / Idle
979
1269
30%
1973
102%
2036
108%
2446
150%
1346
37%
H.264
637
1142
79%
1078
69%
788
24%
1468
130%
995
56%
WiFi v1.3
424
788
86%
844
99%
766
81%
975
130%
687
62%
Load
297
367
24%
410
38%
337
13%
296
0%
389
31%

Pros

+ 在120赫兹下明亮的4K OLED
+ 良好的立体声扬声器
+ 设备（插孔，状态LED）。
+ 通过usb-c端口进行图像输出
+ 更快的SoC
+ 吸引人的做工
+ 丰富的相机软件

Cons

- 只能通过单频定位
- 缓慢的microSD插槽
- 只有3年的更新时间
- 运行时间短
- 只有30瓦的快速充电

对索尼Xperia 1 IV的评判

在审查中。索尼Xperia 1 IV。评论样本由cyberport.de提供
在审查中。索尼Xperia 1 IV。评论样本由cyberport.de提供

Xperia 1 IV是高端智能手机领域的个人主义者。索尼的旗舰产品是高质量和非常好的装备，但它的性能与Xperia 1 IV不在同一水平上。 三星Galaxy S22 Ultra 或 奥普Find X5 Pro在某些方面（摄像头、电池寿命、显示屏亮度）。另一方面，Xperia 1 IV迎合了3.5毫米插孔和内存扩展爱好者的需求--至少在这个价格范围内。此外，索尼在顶部抛出了几乎被遗忘的状态LED。非常漂亮的OLED面板及其高分辨率也是Xperia 1 IV的独特卖点，但它不得不向LTPO竞争者认输，例如 小米12 Pro在亮度和能源效率方面。

Xperia 1 IV做了很多与竞争对手不同的事情。

由于高质量的摄像头和广泛的软件，用户的装备非常灵活，特别是在视频录制领域。此外，博客作者将受益于广泛的可调设置与可选配件的结合，这再次迎合了一个小众市场。然而，与竞争对手相比，Xperia 1 IV不太适合拍摄点对点照片，因为自动模式下的照片仅有部分令人满意--尤其是可变变焦有些令人失望。只想按下快门按钮的用户不会对Xperia 1 IV的结果感到满意。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

在美国，索尼Xperia 1 IV的512GB版本可通过亚马逊进行预购，价格为 $1,599.99.

否则，索尼Xperia 1 IV的可用性似乎因地而异。例如，我们发现，我们审查的配置可通过亚马逊英国，价格为 £1,299.00,法国亚马逊为 1 398,98€和 西班牙亚马逊为 1.249,00€.通过亚马逊在加拿大、印度和澳大利亚的网站搜索被证明是不成功的，尽管这并不意味着该智能手机不能通过其他分销商获得。

价格截止到2022年8月6日，可能会有变化。

Sony Xperia 1 IV - 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 91%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
70 / 70 → 99%
Weight
89%
Battery
81%
Display
94%
Games Performance
54 / 64 → 84%
Application Performance
92 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
83 / 90 → 92%
Camera
79%
Average
83%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 索尼Xperia 1 IV评论。首款具有真正光学变焦、4K OLED和插孔的智能手机
Marcus Herbrich, 2022-08- 7 (Update: 2024-08-15)