联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 评测--配备 120Hz OLED 和 RTX 4050 的多媒体笔记本电脑 笔记本电脑
提升 GPU 性能
联想的 Yoga Pro 7 14 是一款快速的多媒体笔记本电脑,可以选择配备专用的GeForce GPU。我们测试了配备 Meteor Lake Core Ultra 7 155H、32 GB 内存、120 Hz OLED 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑的版本。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论 - Yoga Pro 7 14 的 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑拥有更好的 GPU 性能
联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 是一款不错的多媒体笔记本电脑,其专用GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑的图形性能是 iGPU 配置的两倍。其最大 TGP 为 60 瓦的性能发展还算不错,笔记本电脑的酷睿 7 155H 处理器性能也同样不错(70 瓦)。不过,它的高功率限制导致风扇声音很大,而与 AMD 变体相比,Ryzen AI 9 365 能以更低的功率提供更高的性能。因此,AMD/Nvidia 组合实际上是更好的选择。
Yoga 的外壳(包括端口)令人印象深刻,键盘也非常舒适。此外,它还配备了出色的扬声器。可选的 120-Hz OLED 屏幕可提供出色的画质,联想还提供了 P3 和 sRGB 的精确配置文件。不过,面板的反射率也很高,我们注意到在 240 Hz 频率下会出现持续的 PWM 闪烁。
除了风扇噪音大之外,这款笔记本电脑的弱点还包括运行时间,不幸的是,它的运行时间充其量只能算一般。此外,它的电源装置也不够大。在负载很高的情况下,必须使用电池来满足设备的耗电量。这是没有必要的,当然对电池也没有好处。联想应该配备一个 130 瓦的电源装置。更不用说它的内存无法升级,而且由于专用 GPU 的存在,你只能安装一个小巧的 M.2-2242 SSD。
Pros
Cons
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,989.00 Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16"" Lapt... 2. $1,797.00 Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i Laptop, I... 3. $1,349.00 Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AHP9-202... List Price: 1699€ | 1.6 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.50" 2880x1800 234 PPI OLED | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $68.99 PowerHOOD 20V AC/DC Adapter ... List Price: 1890€ | 1.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,359.00 List Price: 2949€ | 1.8 kg | 19 mm | 14.50" 3200x2000 260 PPI OLED | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,199.49 List Price: 1030 USD | 1.5 kg | 16.5 mm | 14.00" 2240x1400 189 PPI IPS | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $122.99 14" 2880(RGB)*1800 90Hz EDP ... 2. $132.99 14.0" 2880(RGB)*1800 90Hz ED... 3. $132.99 14.0" 2880(RGB)*1800 90Hz ED... List Price: 1985€ | 1.3 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,349.00 Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AHP9-202... 2. $1,549.00 Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 ... 3. $52.00 WODBAO for Laptop Lenovo Yog... List Price: 1300 EUR | 1.6 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.50" 3072x1920 250 PPI IPS |
联想为其 Yoga Pro 7 14 提供了多种配置,我们已经测试了 AMD Zen5和 英特尔机型(均配备集成显卡)。不过,也有配备 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑的更强大变体(尤其是 GPU)。我们目前的测试设备的 MRSP 略高于 1700 美元,配备了流星湖酷睿 7 155H 处理器、32 GB 内存、120 Hz 的 2.8K OLED 屏幕和专用的 英伟达GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑.
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
外壳和连接
总的来说,我们测试设备的外壳设计与我们已经测试过的 AMD Zen5 或英特尔版本基本相同,但它的配色不是潮灰色,而是潮茶色,即绿松石色外壳。金属外壳的稳定性和制造质量无可挑剔,表面也不容易留下指纹痕迹。与其他一些联想笔记本电脑相比,该机的摄像头驼峰非常隐蔽,如果要打开机盖,单手就能轻松完成。
内存是焊接上去的,因此维护选项仅限于 WLAN 模块、紧凑型 M.2-2242 SSD(iGPU 版本为 M.2-2280)和清洁风扇。必要时还可以更换旋入式电池。所有重要端口都已配备(包括 Thunderbolt 4),1080p 网络摄像头(包括红外传感器和电子快门)支持 Windows Studio Effects。Wi-Fi 模块符合 Wi-Fi 6E 标准,在我们的测试中实现了较高的传输速率;不过,这款笔记本电脑没有读卡器。
Networking | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
可持续性
联想没有提供任何有关 Yoga Pro 7 14 生产过程中二氧化碳排放量的信息,但该设备至少获得了 EPEAT Gold 和能源之星认证。它的包装完全不使用塑料,底座和屏幕盖都使用了 50% 的回收铝。
输入设备 - 1.5 毫米键程
笔记本键盘的键程为 1.5 毫米,反馈精确,因此打字感觉很舒适。不过,较大的按键声音尤其大。尽管键盘采用蓝色配色,但按键的可视性很好,两级白色背光(也可通过传感器自动激活)在黑暗环境中也能提供帮助。ClickPad 原则上运行良好,但下部区域的机械咔哒声非常响亮,给人一种廉价的感觉。
显示屏 - 2.8K OLED,120 Hz
我们测试设备的 14.5 英寸 OLED 屏幕(2880 x 1800 像素,16:10)拥有非常出色的主观画质,不再像联想之前的 2.8K OLED 屏幕那样存在光栅效应问题。它的刷新率为 120 Hz,动作看起来超级流畅,而且响应速度极快。OLED 面板不会出现背光出血现象,但会以 240 Hz 的频率持续闪烁。它的亮度和色温都不能根据环境光线自动调节。它没有触摸屏。
在 SDR 模式下,它的亮度约为 400 cd/m²,再加上低黑度,因此对比度极高。在 HDR 模式下,我们测得显示小幅图像时的最大亮度为 650 cd/m²,显示几乎全白图像时的最大亮度为 520 cd/m²。不过需要注意的是,HDR 模式必须手动激活,否则色彩配置文件将不再工作。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 398 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 LEN145WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5", 120 Hz | SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED SDC41A2, OLED, 3200x2000, 14.5", 120 Hz | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 BOE0C9E, IPS, 2240x1400, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Lenovo LEN145-3K (LEN8AAF), IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5", 120 Hz | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 CSOT T3 MNE007ZA1-3, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 90 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -16% | -0% | -18% | -1% | -13% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 98 | 70.3 -28% | 98.5 1% | 67.1 -32% | 98.4 0% | 74.7 -24% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 97.4 -3% | 100 0% | 99 -1% | 100 0% | 99.6 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 88.8 | 72.4 -18% | 87.2 -2% | 68.9 -22% | 86.9 -2% | 75.8 -15% |
Response Times | -6393% | 4% | -6370% | -5046% | -4907% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.43 ? | 38.5 ? -8853% | 0.7 ? -63% | 35.9 ? -8249% | 34.1 ? -7830% | 32.2 ? -7388% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.61 ? | 24.6 ? -3933% | 0.77 ? -26% | 28 ? -4490% | 14.4 ? -2261% | 15.4 ? -2425% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 480 100% | ||||
Screen | -17% | -13% | -19% | 20% | -8% | |
Brightness middle | 398 | 325 -18% | 351 -12% | 359.5 -10% | 464 17% | 402 1% |
Brightness | 402 | 317 -21% | 353 -12% | 361 -10% | 456 13% | 371 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 94 -4% | 97 -1% | 92 -6% | 90 -8% | 86 -12% |
Black Level * | 0.12 | 0.27 | 0.36 | 0.27 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.8 -29% | 1.7 -21% | 1.64 -17% | 0.9 36% | 1.8 -29% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.7 | 3.4 8% | 2.2 41% | 4.68 -26% | 2.32 37% | 3.6 3% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 2.5 -39% | 3.1 -72% | 2.6 -44% | 1.4 22% | 1.8 -0% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.15 102% | 2.12 104% | 2.22 99% | 2.218 99% | 2.27 97% |
CCT | 6609 98% | 7017 93% | 6616 98% | 6388 102% | 6669 97% | 6695 97% |
Contrast | 2708 | 1331 | 1289 | 1489 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.97 | 0.35 | 1.5 | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2142% /
-1176% | -3% /
-6% | -2136% /
-1173% | -1676% /
-907% | -1643% /
-900% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对面板进行了分析。联想在 Vantage 应用程序中提供了各种配置文件,选择 P3 配置文件后,显示效果已经相当出色。无论是灰阶还是色彩,我们都没有发现超过重要偏差值 3 的异常值,也没有发现偏色现象。用户还可以使用精确的 sRGB 配置文件。P3 和 sRGB 色彩空间均已完全覆盖。我们无法通过自己的校准进一步改善显示效果。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.61 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.33 ms rise | |
↘ 0.28 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.22 ms rise | |
↘ 0.21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 50 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8687 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
屏幕非常容易反光,这在室外很快就会成为一个问题。另一方面,它的视角稳定性非常好。
表演 - 流星湖-H
我们的测试设备配备了 32GB LPDDR5x-7467 内存,对于大多数用户来说应该足够了。不过,没有扩展选项。
测试条件
联想提供了多种能耗配置文件,可以通过 Vantage 软件或组合键 Fn+Q 进行切换。我们使用最高性能模式进行了以下基准测试和测量,以充分发挥 CPU 和 GPU 的性能。
节能模式 | CPU TDP | CB R23 Multi | GPU TGP | Time Spy 图形 | 最大风扇噪音排放 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
省电模式 | 50/15 瓦 | 12,648 分 | 13 瓦 | 1,251 分 | 29.8 分贝(A) |
自适应节电模式(自动) | 70/65 瓦 | 17,539 分 | 50 瓦 | 6,461 分 | 45 dB(A) |
性能 | 75/70 瓦 | 18,184 点 | 60 瓦 | 7,342 点 | 49.1 dB(A) |
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H作为笔记本电脑的处理器。它共有 16 个内核(22 个线程),运行功耗范围为 28-115 瓦。在我们的测试中,Yoga Pro 7 14 的最大功耗为 75 瓦,随后稳定在 70 瓦。因此,它的多核性能总体良好且稳定,尽管 Ryzen AI 9 365虽然 Ryzen AI 9 365 的功耗略低(60/54 瓦),但却取得了更好的成绩。此外,其性能在电池模式下也保持稳定。更多 CPU 基准测试可在我们的 技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=49) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1815, n=49) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=47) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11924, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (601 - 696, n=47) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=88, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 5224, n=95, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1932 - 2880, n=53) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (99.6 - 268, n=49) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (100 - 502, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (175 - 381, n=45) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 130368, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (41739 - 70254, n=47) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (4795 - 5621, n=47) |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 25760, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (7732 - 13656, n=52) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=66, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1901 - 2473, n=49) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10017 - 13556, n=49) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1462 - 1824, n=49) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 34.3, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=47) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (37.5 - 79.2, n=46) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.4457 - 0.53, n=46) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (5121 - 50388, n=77, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=47) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 201874, n=78, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=47) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 8623, n=78, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=47) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 181505, n=78, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=47) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=78, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=47) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 105740, n=77, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=47) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=47) | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=78, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=47) | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 2022, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (2759 - 26875, n=78, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=47) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=47) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=78, last 2 years) |
系统性能
Yoga 在系统基准测试中表现出色,在日常使用中反应灵敏。我们的测试设备在系统稳定性方面没有任何问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (6537 - 6973, n=4) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (10044 - 10446, n=4) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (8769 - 9272, n=4) | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=73, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (8602 - 9624, n=4) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1552 - 1740, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2042, n=91, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1459 - 1659, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=91, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1811 - 1930, n=4) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2094, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1167 - 1467, n=4) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=87, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (278 - 285, n=4) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (255 - 260, n=4) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (416 - 537, n=4) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6941 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=47) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=78, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=47) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=78, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=47) | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=78, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (116.2 - 233, n=47) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=78, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试(上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,我们的测试设备在当前 BIOS 版本下没有出现任何问题。其中一个驱动程序确实有点故障,但重要的 "中断到进程延迟 "值很低。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
如上所述,配备专用 GPU 的 Yoga Pro 7 14 只能使用一个紧凑型 M.2-2242 SSD。我们的测试设备中安装的是 1 TB 版本的三星 PM9C1a,我们测量的 PCIe 4.0 SSD 的传输速率还不错。在持续负载的情况下,其性能略有波动,但不会造成任何问题。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
除了处理器集成的 Intel Arc Graphics 外,我们的测试设备还使用了专用的 英伟达GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑配备 6GB VRAM,通过 Optimus 技术进行图形切换。4050 笔记本电脑的最大 TGP 为 60 瓦(45 瓦 + 15 瓦 Dynamic Boost),因此无法充分发挥 4050 笔记本电脑的全部性能。在合成图形基准测试中,Yoga Pro 7 14 的两个 iGPU 型号的性能都翻了一番。戴尔 XPS 14(30 瓦 TGP)内的 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑速度明显较慢,而 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑则更快。
这些结果在实际游戏测试中得到了证实,Yoga Pro 7 14 可以应对当前高分辨率和全高清分辨率下的游戏。不过,在 QHD 分辨率下,情况就有些紧张了。但总的来说,它还是取得了不错的成绩。其 GPU 和游戏性能在长期负载下保持不变。在电池模式下,GPU 的功耗被限制在 45 瓦,性能降低了约 12%。更多 GPU 基准测试 这里.
3DMark 11 Performance | 24470 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17998 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 7757 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 1561 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 7254 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (19 - 105, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (25 - 37, n=38) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 181, n=48, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (47 - 175, n=38) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (160 - 946, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (243 - 907, n=38) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8.26 - 86, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 | |
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 141.6, n=83, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 133.5 | 84.9 | 63.7 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 163.1 | 148.7 | 143.9 | 133.8 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 156 | 99 | 71.9 | 52.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 127.9 | 113.6 | 89.9 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 385 | 178 | 146 | 129 | 86 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 95.9 | 74.4 | 53.3 | 49.8 | 35.7 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 88.9 | 70.5 | 59.3 | 50.8 | 31.4 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
冷却装置的两个风扇在空转和低负载时通常保持静音或发出低噪音(约 30 dB(A))。但是,一旦处理器或显卡处于负载状态,由于功率限制较高,噪音很快就会变得清晰可闻。我们在游戏和压力测试时都测得了 49.1 dB(A),从长远来看,这可能会令人讨厌。在自适应模式(自动)下,我们测得的噪音为 45 分贝(A),仍然非常清晰可闻。我们本希望噪音分布更广一些,达到 40 分贝(A)左右。只有在省电模式下,噪音才会明显降低,最高可降至 29.8 分贝(A)--但此时笔记本电脑的性能也会明显降低,例如无法再玩游戏。我们的测试设备没有发出其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.4 / 25.4 / 29.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 39.3 / 49.1 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.4 dB(A) |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N | SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2550 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TGE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -10% | 4% | 10% | 4% | 5% | 9% | |
off / environment * | 25.4 | 25.5 -0% | 24.3 4% | 23.8 6% | 23.5 7% | 24 6% | 23.8 6% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.4 | 25.5 -0% | 24.3 4% | 24.9 2% | 23.5 7% | 25 2% | 23.8 6% |
Idle Average * | 25.4 | 26.5 -4% | 26.5 -4% | 24.9 2% | 23.5 7% | 27 -6% | 23.8 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.8 | 30.3 -2% | 28.5 4% | 24.9 16% | 26 13% | 30 -1% | 23.8 20% |
Load Average * | 39.3 | 49.3 -25% | 37 6% | 32.9 16% | 43.6 -11% | 36 8% | 44.6 -13% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 49.1 | 57.8 -18% | 40.9 17% | 35.9 27% | |||
Load Maximum * | 49.1 | 57.8 -18% | 43.3 12% | 43 12% | 49.1 -0% | 38 23% | 44.6 9% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.1 | 48.7 | 38 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
联想很好地控制了笔记本的表面温度,即使在满载的情况下,我们测得的最高温度也只有 43 °C。因此,在这种情况下,你可以把 Yoga 放在大腿上。整个机箱在低负载时也能保持良好的冷却状态。在压力测试过程中,图形处理器的工作功率为 45 瓦,而处理器的工作功率最初有些波动,最后稳定在 30 瓦。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.5 °C / 86.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Radeon 890M | SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -20% | 2% | -7% | -9% | 4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42.4 | 43.1 -2% | 40.5 4% | 40.4 5% | 48.5 -14% | 43 -1% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43.3 | 51.3 -18% | 42.6 2% | 43.6 -1% | 52.8 -22% | 42 3% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.5 | 33.2 -21% | 26.9 2% | 31 -13% | 27.6 -0% | 25 9% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.6 | 38.3 -39% | 27.8 -1% | 32.2 -17% | 27 2% | 26 6% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
它的闲置功耗值相当低,但在负载情况下,问题很快就显现出来。随机提供的 100 瓦电源不足以满足笔记本电脑在满载情况下的耗电量。在压力测试中,我们测得的功率略低于 111 瓦,而在其余测试中则约为 105 瓦。因此,在压力测试期间,电池每小时放电约 9%。即使在短时间的负载峰值期间,电池也总是需要短暂使用。这是不必要的节约成本措施,联想应该为 dGPU 版本提供 130 瓦的电源。
Off / Standby | 0.47 / 0.59 Watt |
Idle | 4.9 / 6.9 / 9.3 Watt |
Load |
79.7 / 110.9 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N | SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -46% | -22% | 31% | -5% | 8% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.9 | 5.8 -18% | 8.1 -65% | 2.7 45% | 5.2 -6% | 4 18% |
Idle Average * | 6.9 | 10.8 -57% | 9.9 -43% | 5.4 22% | 7.8 -13% | 5.5 20% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.3 | 11.1 -19% | 10.4 -12% | 5.5 41% | 9 3% | 11.8 -27% |
Load Average * | 79.7 | 87.4 -10% | 75.6 5% | 67.4 15% | 78.6 1% | 66 17% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 97.5 | 175.3 -80% | 67.9 30% | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 96.1 | 169.1 -76% | 67.8 29% | |||
Load Maximum * | 110.9 | 183 -65% | 107.1 3% | 68.3 38% | 121.2 -9% | 100 10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 65.6 | 86.8 | 55 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
73 瓦时的电池总体上只能提供一般的续航时间。在 150 cd/m²(相当于我们测试设备最大 SDR 亮度的 69%)和 60 Hz 的 WLAN 测试中,它的续航时间约为 8 小时(或在 120 Hz 时为 7 小时),在全 SDR 亮度下为 6:17 小时(或在 120 Hz 时为 05:40 小时)。在 150 cd/m² 下的视频测试中,该设备的续航时间超过了 13 小时,效果更好。
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Dell XPS 14 2024 OLED Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 69.5 Wh | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Radeon 890M, 68 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 14 M23 RTX 3050 i7-13700H, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 73 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 73 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -5% | -12% | 18% | 52% | 43% | -2% | 15% | |
H.264 | 794 | 635 -20% | 649 -18% | 842 ? 6% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 477 | 454 -5% | 465 -3% | 661 39% | 723 52% | 680 43% | 527 10% | 631 ? 32% |
Load | 91 | 79 -13% | 88 -3% | 93 2% | 96.3 ? 6% |
Notebookcheck 总评分
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, RTX 4050
- 01/10/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.