联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 G9 评测--配备 AMD Zen 5 和 120Hz OLED 的强大多媒体笔记本电脑
联想的 Yoga Pro 7 14 系列包括 14.5 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑。新的 G9 型号采用了 AMD 最新的 Zen 5 处理器,即 Ryzen AI 9 365-以及集成的 Radeon 880M iGPU.此外,它还配备了 32 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 以及 120 Hz、2.8K OLED 屏幕和全 P3 覆盖。我们的测试设备零售价约为 1,780 美元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.1 % | v8 | 09 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M | 1.5 kg | 18 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
84.9 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
89.6 % | v8 | 09 / 2024 | Honor MagicBook Art 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1 kg | 12.9 mm | 14.60" | 3120x2080 | |
86.4 % | v8 | 08 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 1.3 kg | 15 mm | 14.50" | 2944x1840 | |
85.5 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
85.1 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.5 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.6 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
请注意:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.
外壳 - 坚固的铝制外壳
总的来说,我们已经对 Yoga Pro 7 14 的外壳有所了解,只是在前代机型的基础上做了一些改动。例如,现在 Yoga 的书写位置从盖子移到了掌托的右下角。与其他联想笔记本电脑相比,摄像头的驼峰没有那么明显,而底部显示屏边框则相当宽。灰色的机身看起来超级时尚,在专业环境中使用也不会显得突兀。指纹痕迹在这款设备上不是大问题。
在质量方面,我们没有什么可抱怨的--它的制造质量很好,铝制外壳的稳定性也不错。键盘的中间区域可以轻微按入,而试图扭转则会受到笔记本的抵制。显示屏盖本身相当稳定,铰链也调整得很好,只有轻微晃动。它的最大开启角度接近 180 度。
Yoga Pro 7 是我们对比领域中最大的笔记本电脑之一,不过两者之间的差距并不大。联想规定的机身高度为 1.6 厘米,但这只是设备正面的高度。在背面(不包括橡胶脚垫),我们测得的高度为 1.8 厘米,是目前设备中最厚的机型之一。它的重量略高于 1.5 千克,100 瓦的电源还增加了 446 克。
连接性 - 配备 USB 4.0 的 AMD Yoga
联想只给 Yoga Pro 7 配备了一个现代 USB 4.0 端口,而另一个 USB-C 连接则符合 3.2 Gen 2 标准。不过,由于这个接口可能只用于为设备充电,因此这个限制在实际使用中不会有太大影响。右侧有一个普通的 USB-A 端口,在日常使用中还是很方便的。我们希望能看到另一个 USB-C 端口,这样就能从两侧为笔记本电脑充电了。
交流
WLAN 模块由联发科制造(MT9722),支持 Wi-Fi 6E 标准和蓝牙 5.3。与华硕的参考路由器配合使用,其传输速率高且稳定。在测试过程中,我们从未遇到过任何信号质量问题。
Networking | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
网络摄像头
联想安装了一个普通的 1080p 网络摄像头(电子快门),包括一个红外传感器,用于通过 Windows Hello 进行图像识别。但其画质一般。虽然新的 AMD 处理器配备了功能强大的 NPU,但这款笔记本电脑还不支持所有 Copilot+ 功能,不幸的是,这还包括网络摄像头的 Studio Effects。值得庆幸的是,AMD 和微软已经宣布将在年内进行更新。
维护
机箱底盖由 Torx 螺钉(T5)固定,可以轻松取下。从内部可以看到紧凑型 M.2 2242 固态硬盘、无线局域网模块、风扇以及旋入式电池。另一方面,内存是焊接上去的,无法升级。
可持续性
Yoga Pro 7 14 的包装完全由可回收材料制成,联想宣称抵消了 0.5 吨二氧化碳。该设备还符合能源之星 8.0 和 EPEAT Gold 标准。
输入设备 - 1.5 毫米键程
Yoga Pro 7 14 的键盘键程为 1.5 毫米,打字时总体感觉舒适。不过,按键声音有点大,尤其是较大的按键,如回车键或空格键。键盘上还有一个 "Copilot "键,但你可以争论一下这个键有多大用处。除此之外,键盘布局清晰,但垂直方向键有点窄。键盘具有两级背光,可根据环境光线条件自动调节。
点击板的尺寸为 13.5 x 8 厘米,手感舒适顺滑,我们在使用过程中没有发现任何问题。也可以通过机械方式点击键盘底部,但会发出非常响亮和廉价的声音。
显示屏 - 120 赫兹 OLED
新款 Yoga Pro 714 G9 独家配备了 14.5 英寸 OLED 面板(3,072 x 1,920,16:10)。从主观上看,它的画质非常出色,即使是浅色表面也不会出现颗粒感,而动画效果则得益于其更高的刷新率(120 Hz)。它的响应速度超快,而且我们没有发现任何背光出血现象。不过,它的亮度和色温都不能自动调节。此外,我们还测量到在所有亮度水平下,PWM 闪烁频率均为 240 Hz。
在 SDR 工作模式下,屏幕的最大亮度略高于 400 cd/m²,这是一个不错的结果。加上较低的黑色值,它提供了 OLED 面板典型的出色对比度。在 HDR 工作模式下,我们注意到在显示小图像摘录时的最大亮度为 604 cd/m²,而在显示几乎全白的屏幕时的最大亮度约为 500 cd/m²。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 400 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 LEN145WQ+, OLED, 3072x1920, 14.5", 120 Hz | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA ATNA40CT02-0 (SDC41A0), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Honor MagicBook Art 14 EDO14.44, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.6", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 LEN145WQ+, OLED, 2944x1840, 14.5", 90 Hz | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Lenovo LEN145-3K (LEN8AAF), IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 4% | -1% | 1% | -15% | -16% | -0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 98 | 99.9 2% | 95.9 -2% | 97.3 -1% | 70.3 -28% | 70.1 -28% | 98.4 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 99.7 0% | 97.7 -2% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 88.1 | 97.2 10% | 86.5 -2% | 90.8 3% | 72.1 -18% | 72.3 -18% | 86.9 -1% |
Response Times | -97% | -22% | 15% | -4862% | -4836% | -4956% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.44 ? | 1.3 ? -195% | 0.58 ? -32% | 0.39 ? 11% | 32.7 ? -7332% | 31.1 ? -6968% | 34.1 ? -7650% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.61 ? | 1.2 ? -97% | 0.52 ? 15% | 0.71 ? -16% | 15.2 ? -2392% | 17.1 ? -2703% | 14.4 ? -2261% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 240 ? 0% | 120 -50% | 360 ? 50% | |||
Screen | -17% | 3% | -17% | -17% | -76% | 7% | |
Brightness middle | 400 | 385 -4% | 477 19% | 472 18% | 418 5% | 466 17% | 464 16% |
Brightness | 403 | 382 -5% | 480 19% | 475 18% | 408 1% | 467 16% | 456 13% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 95 -2% | 92 -5% | 97 0% | 90 -7% | 94 -3% | 90 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.03 | 0.3 | 0.29 | 0.36 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1 | 1.99 -99% | 1 -0% | 1.4 -40% | 1.6 -60% | 2.5 -150% | 0.9 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.8 | 3.69 -32% | 2 29% | 4.1 -46% | 2.5 11% | 6.1 -118% | 2.32 17% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 0.8 38% | 1.9 -46% | 2 -54% | 2 -54% | 4.1 -215% | 1.4 -8% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.204 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.21 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.218 99% |
CCT | 6586 99% | 6474 100% | 6178 105% | 6493 100% | 6851 95% | 7386 88% | 6669 97% |
Contrast | 12833 | 1393 | 1607 | 1289 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.79 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 0.35 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -37% /
-32% | -7% /
-5% | -0% /
-5% | -1631% /
-898% | -1643% /
-925% | -1650% /
-897% |
* ... smaller is better
我们还使用专业的 CalMAN 软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)对面板进行了分析。联想提供了多种配置文件,标准配置为 "原生"。不过,它已经提供了很好的描绘效果,但色彩看起来有些过度饱和,导致色彩显得有些鲜艳。如果你希望色彩尽可能准确,那么你应该使用 Display P3 配置文件,在该配置文件中,所有色彩偏差都低于 3 的重要限制。
此外,还有一个超精确的 AdobeRGB 配置文件,但该大色彩空间并未完全覆盖,而 sRGB 和 P3 空间则完全覆盖。此外,摄影师还可以从 sRGB/Rec709 配置文件中获益。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.61 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.33 ms rise | |
↘ 0.28 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.22 ms rise | |
↘ 0.22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 56 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
闪亮的显示屏在室外有反光问题,但我们对其视角稳定性没有任何负面评价。
性能 - AMD Zen 5,32 GB 内存
Yoga Pro 7 14 G9 AMD 目前只配备了 Ryzen AI 9 365、Radeon 880M 和 32 GB 内存(LPDDR5x-7500,不可升级)。专用显卡(RTX 4050 Laptop)只适用于英特尔版本的 Yoga Pro 7。新的 AMD CPU 提供了性能高达 50 TOPS 的强大 NPU,这意味着该设备符合微软 Copilot+ 指定的要求,但目前并不支持所有功能。随着年底的更新,这种情况应该会有所改变。
测试条件
联想允许用户选择三种能源配置文件(省电 模式、自动模式、性能模式),可通过预装的 Vantage 应用程序或 Fn+Q 组合键进行切换。我们在下表中汇总了各个配置文件的数据。在测试中,我们将自动配置文件作为标准配置使用,在该配置文件下,笔记本电脑的性能非常好,但风扇的声音也会非常大。特别是在执行简单的日常任务时,你也可以毫不犹豫地使用省电 模式,在该模式下几乎听不到风扇的声音。我们希望能有更大的差异,因为两个配置文件的自动和性能非常接近。
能源概况 | CPU TDP | CB R23 Multi | Time Spy 图形 | 最大风扇噪音排放 |
---|---|---|---|---|
省电模式 | 32 -> 25 瓦 | 13,698 点 | 3,155 点 | 30.3 dB(A) |
自动 | 60 -> 54 瓦 | 18,748 点 | 3,423 点 | 44.6 dB(A) |
性能 | 70 -> 60 瓦 | 19,091 分 | 3,458 分 | 47.7 分贝(A) |
处理器 - Ryzen AI 9 365
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365共有 10 个 CPU 内核(4x Zen 5 + 6x Zen 5c),因此比 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 少两个 5c 内核。 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.有关该处理器的更多技术细节 请点击.笔记本电脑制造商实际上可以在 28-54 瓦的范围内运行 Zen 5 处理器,但在 Yoga Pro 7 中,它的最大功耗高达 70 瓦。不过,看看我们的能耗曲线表也能发现,54 瓦以上几乎没有任何额外性能。
它的基准测试结果整体上非常出色,仅次于华硕 Vivobook S 14 中的 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370,功率限制与之相似。与搭载了 Ryzen 7 7840HS在所有 CPU 基准测试中领先 11%,比 酷睿至尊 7 155H的 17%。配备 骁龙 X Elite只是在本地 Cinebench 2024 测试中表现出色。
此外,CPU 的性能在持续负载下几乎保持不变,这也适用于电池运行。更多 CPU 基准测试可在 技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA -2! | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 -2! | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 -2! |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (590 - 996, n=4) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (148 - 1162, n=44, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (35 - 142, n=27, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (11462 - 18748, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (1942 - 1992, n=2) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (5247 - 7346, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (758 - 782, n=2) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (1950 - 2855, n=2) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=63, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (293 - 303, n=2) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (194 - 270, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (47754 - 65071, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (5928 - 6012, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (12627 - 14118, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 15220, n=55, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (2778 - 2815, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3130, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (9599 - 13009, n=2) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=57, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (2065 - 2095, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (18.6 - 20.5, n=2) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (50.8 - 54.9, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (0.4201 - 0.4272, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (17096 - 29902, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (61976 - 114482, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (2951 - 4803, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (85333 - 93045, n=2) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (11586 - 16039, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (33409 - 61298, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (47468 - 64702, n=2) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (706 - 1227, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (9061 - 16159, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (47654 - 50517, n=2) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 53954, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
系统性能
在日常使用中,Yoga 是一款响应速度极快的笔记本电脑。在我们的测试中,系统稳定性也没有任何问题。AMD Yoga 在合成基准测试中的表现同样出色。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (7045 - 7641, n=2) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=49, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (10421 - 11140, n=2) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=49, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (10150 - 10293, n=2) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (8973 - 10559, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=49, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M () | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M () | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M () | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (255 - 263, n=3) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=63, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M (445 - 456, n=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7641 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (88985 - 90113, n=2) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=56, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (89012 - 99376, n=2) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=56, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (98687 - 100507, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 112837, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (116.3 - 119.5, n=2) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=56, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试(网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时显示出轻微的限制。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Yoga Pro 7 14 使用的是 PCIe 4.0 连接的紧凑型 M.2 2242 SSD,在我们的例子中是 Micron 2550,容量为 1 TB。首次启动设备后,用户有 898 GB 的可用空间。固态硬盘的传输速率完全正常,即使在持续负载的情况下,整体也非常稳定。更多固态硬盘基准测试请点击 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
集成的 Radeon 880M GPU有 10 个计算单元,最高时钟频率为 2.9 GHz,因此性能低于配备 12 个计算单元的 Radeon 890M。不过,结合快速内存,其性能仍然非常出色,几乎与 Vivobook S 14 配备的 890M.根据功率限制,配备 8 个 Xe 内核的英特尔 Arc Graphics 图形处理器在合成测试中遥遥领先,但配备 Adreno X1-85 GPU 图形处理器的 Vivobook S 14 则在合成测试中处于劣势。 Adreno X1-85 GPU(骁龙 X Elite 芯片的 Adreno X1-85 GPU(3.8 TFLOPS)明显落后。
但在游戏基准测试中,情况发生了变化,Radeon 880M 明显领先于英特尔的竞争对手,甚至击败了 Vivobook 中的 890M。这也可能是由于驱动程序版本不同造成的。总的来说,作为一款 iGPU,它的游戏性能非常出色,即使在长时间的游戏过程中,我们也没有发现性能下降。即使在电池供电的情况下,图形处理器的性能也能保持稳定。更多基准测试 这里.
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 50845 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 14856 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 38530 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8716 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3810 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 571 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3325 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon 880M (300 - 429, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Art 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 173.3 | 165 | 81.6 | 32.7 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 176 | 55 | 34.6 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 164.8 | 137.4 | 101.2 | 90.5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 90.5 | 46.4 | 32 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 82.5 | 65.9 | 49.5 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 95 | 58 | 53 | 50 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 191.4 | 77.4 | 66 | 55.7 |
F1 23 (2023) | 94.3 | 84.7 | 61.8 | 14.4 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 41.1 | 32.7 | 27.2 | 26.6 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 41.4 | 32.4 | 24.2 | 21 |
F1 24 (2024) | 95.2 | 82.7 | 59.5 | 14.4 |
排放 - 负载时风扇噪音大
噪音排放
高功率限制不仅体现在笔记本电脑的性能上,还体现在其风扇的表现上。在闲置模式下,风扇通常处于关闭状态,但一旦处理器或 iGPU 承受较大压力,两个风扇的声音就会清晰可闻。我们在游戏时测得的噪音约为 35 分贝(A),这还算正常,但在 CPU 负载较高和压力测试时,噪音很快就达到了 44 分贝(A)。这已经非常大了,而且明显高于英特尔版 Yoga Pro 7 14。通过使用省电模式,可将最大音量限制在更舒适的 30 分贝(A)。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.8 / 23.8 / 23.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 44.6 / 44.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.8 dB(A) |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2550 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TGE | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Honor MagicBook Art 14 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | 7% | 6% | -2% | -5% | -2% | -1% | |
off / environment * | 23.8 | 24 -1% | 24 -1% | 24.1 -1% | 23.8 -0% | 25.7 -8% | 24 -1% | 24.3 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.8 | 24 -1% | 24 -1% | 24.1 -1% | 23.8 -0% | 25.7 -8% | 25 -5% | 24.3 -2% |
Idle Average * | 23.8 | 25 -5% | 24 -1% | 24.1 -1% | 23.8 -0% | 25.7 -8% | 27 -13% | 24.3 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.8 | 27 -13% | 25.7 -8% | 24.1 -1% | 27.1 -14% | 25.7 -8% | 30 -26% | 27.9 -17% |
Load Average * | 44.6 | 40 10% | 28.5 36% | 25.3 43% | 34.9 22% | 36.2 19% | 36 19% | 36.7 18% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 35.9 | 39 -9% | 34 5% | 38.6 -8% | 43.7 -22% | 43.6 -21% | ||
Load Maximum * | 44.6 | 40 10% | 35.2 21% | 40.5 9% | 43.7 2% | 43.6 2% | 38 15% | 44.2 1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38 | 44.2 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Yoga Pro 7 的机箱在空转和执行日常任务时几乎不会发热。在负载情况下,高转速风扇的优势就显现出来了,因为其表面温度整体保持在非常低的水平,我们甚至在热点(顶部中间区域)测得了 42 °C的最高温度。因此,在使用过程中没有任何限制。
在 CPU/GPU 综合负载压力测试中,处理器很快稳定在 54 瓦,并保持在这一水平。GPU 的工作频率约为 1.3 GHz,CPU 内核的平均时钟频率为 2.9 GHz。SoC 温度保持在约 76 °C。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.9 °C / -5.3 F).
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M | Honor MagicBook Art 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -15% | -5% | -10% | -6% | -4% | 4% | -2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 49 -17% | 44.2 -5% | 44.9 -7% | 43.7 -4% | 44.6 -6% | 43 -2% | 42.1 -0% |
Maximum Bottom * | 40.6 | 59 -45% | 47.9 -18% | 51.5 -27% | 49.4 -22% | 50.9 -25% | 42 -3% | 49.7 -22% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28.2 | 28 1% | 27.7 2% | 28.9 -2% | 27.7 2% | 26.5 6% | 25 11% | 25.7 9% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.9 | 29 -0% | 28.2 2% | 29.4 -2% | 28.6 1% | 26.3 9% | 26 10% | 27.3 6% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Yoga 的音响系统共有 4 个模块(2 个高音扬声器、2 个低音扬声器),每个模块的功率为 2 瓦。效果一般,处于同类产品的一般水平,但仍有改进的余地。它并没有发挥出全部潜能,尤其是在最大音量和低音覆盖方面--这反映在音量上。
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor MagicBook Art 14 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 运行时间短
耗电量
尽管采用了 OLED 面板,但新 Yoga Pro 7 14 在空闲时还是相当省电。不过,在负载情况下,它的高功率限制就变得很明显了,我们测得的最大功率为 95 瓦,在压力测试的进一步过程中,功率降至 89 瓦。游戏时,我们测得的功率略高于 60 瓦。所提供的 100 瓦电源装置大小足够。
Off / Standby | 0.42 / 0.52 Watt |
Idle | 5.5 / 7.6 / 7.9 Watt |
Load |
77.9 / 94.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, Micron 2550 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TGE, OLED, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Honor MagicBook Art 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, YMTC PC300-1TB, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.6" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, OLED, 2944x1840, 14.5" | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, YMTC PC300-1TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | Average AMD Radeon 880M | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -12% | 18% | 24% | -6% | -8% | 3% | -3% | 1% | 13% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.5 | 6 -9% | 5.1 7% | 5.1 7% | 4.4 20% | 4.8 13% | 4 27% | 5.6 -2% | 5.75 ? -5% | 4.49 ? 18% |
Idle Average * | 7.6 | 8 -5% | 8.4 -11% | 8.4 -11% | 9.2 -21% | 8.7 -14% | 5.5 28% | 8.8 -16% | 7.3 ? 4% | 7.66 ? -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.9 | 14 -77% | 8.9 -13% | 8.6 -9% | 9.6 -22% | 9.2 -16% | 11.8 -49% | 9 -14% | 10.5 ? -33% | 9.56 ? -21% |
Load Average * | 77.9 | 76 2% | 43.3 44% | 26.1 66% | 62.6 20% | 63.2 19% | 66 15% | 58.5 25% | 61 ? 22% | 46.6 ? 40% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 63 | 58.6 7% | 38.8 38% | 37.2 41% | 71.5 -13% | 81.3 -29% | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 61.5 | 61.9 -1% | 40.7 34% | 35.3 43% | 71.9 -17% | 80.2 -30% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 94.8 | 94 1% | 66.9 29% | 67.1 29% | 101.7 -7% | 94.5 -0% | 100 -5% | 100.6 -6% | 76.4 ? 19% | 68.6 ? 28% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 55 | 71 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
Yoga 配有 73 瓦时的电池,本身的续航时间还算不错,但几乎在所有情况下,竞争对手都更胜一筹。在 150 cd/m² 的 WLAN 测试中,它在 60 Hz 下甚至无法达到 9 小时(120 Hz 下为 8:16 小时),在全亮度下也只能维持 6 个多小时(60 Hz)或 5:40 小时(120 Hz)。在视频测试中,我们测得的时间略低于 11 小时。设备开机后,充满电仅需 85 分钟,44 分钟后即可恢复 80% 的电量。
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 73 Wh | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 75 Wh | Honor MagicBook Art 14 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 60 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 70 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 80 Wh | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 73 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 73 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 83% | 21% | 35% | 57% | -10% | 29% | 8% | 33% | |
H.264 | 649 | 832 28% | 1028 58% | 1251 93% | 612 -6% | 737 14% | 896 ? 38% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 527 | 990 88% | 576 9% | 892 69% | 888 69% | 571 8% | 680 29% | 618 17% | 719 ? 36% |
Load | 93 | 165 77% | 116 25% | 73 -22% | 101 9% | 64 -31% | 86 -8% | 116.6 ? 25% | |
Reader / Idle | 1902 | 1750 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论:配备 AMD Zen 5 的 Yoga Pro 7 性能出众,但电池续航能力较弱
最新的 Yoga Pro 7 14 G9 配备了全新的 AMD Zen 5 芯片,无论是处理器还是集成显卡,都能提供出色的性能。32 GB 的内存对大多数用户来说都绰绰有余,这也是为什么这款笔记本电脑的升级选项并不像 16 GB 的设备那样重要。它的连接性良好,输入设备舒适,铝制外壳完美无瑕。
这款笔记本电脑的 OLED 显示屏拥有出色的画质--无论是色彩描绘还是动画效果(得益于 120 Hz 的刷新率)。此外,联想还为该设备提供了非常精确的 P3、sRGB 和 Rec709 色彩配置文件,这意味着您可以毫无问题地编辑照片和视频。
由于采用了 AMD Ryzen AI 9 965,新款联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 G9 具有非常出色的性能和极其精确的 OLED 面板,但运行时间相对较短。
电池续航时间无疑是它的一个弱点。就其本身而言,它的续航时间尚可,但在大多数情况下,竞争对手的续航时间要好得多。此外,我们发现它的功率限制设置得有点过高,这对设备的风扇也有负面影响。此外,可用的能耗配置文件也没有很好地分级。自动配置文件过于接近性能模式,而应占据 40 瓦左右的区域。省电模式在日常使用中非常方便,可以控制风扇。
如果你能接受它的运行时间,那么你就可以期待一个良好的整体方案。联想自己的 Yoga Slim 7X采用骁龙 X Elite,机身更轻薄,运行时间也更长--但你不得不忍受 ARM Windows 带来的兼容性问题。华硕 华硕 Vivobook S 14配备 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 的华硕 Vivobook S 14 同样是一个有趣的竞争对手,但它只配备了分辨率更低的 60-Hz OLED 屏幕。Honor MagicBook Art 14另一方面,对于那些追求最轻便的笔记本电脑并能忍受性能略有下降的人来说,MagicBook Art 14 是一款值得关注的产品。
价格和供应情况
新款 Yoga Pro 7 G9 即将从联想直接发售,起价约为 1,780 美元。
请注意:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果无法与第 7 版的结果进行比较。更多信息 请点击此处.
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9
- 09/17/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.