新的CPU名称，旧的CPU性能：联想Slim 7 Pro Ryzen 7 7735HS笔记本电脑评测
联想今年刷新了其超轻薄7 Pro系列，用新的Zen 3+ Ryzen 7 7735HS CPU取代去年的Core i7-12700H和Ryzen 9 6900HS选项。图形也略有升级，从4GBGeForce RTX 3050升级到同一GPU的6GB版本。然而，除了一些内部变化之外，外部机箱几乎完全保持不变。我们建议查看我们现有的两篇评论，关于 瑜伽瘦身7i Pro X和 Slim 7 Pro X以了解更多关于该系列的物理特征。
SKU的范围从Ryzen 7 7735HS到Ryzen 7 7840HS CPU，14.5英寸2.5K（2560 x 1600）或3K（3072 x 1920）IPS触摸屏，分别覆盖sRGB和DCI-P3。目前，所有选项都带有16GB焊接的LPDDR5内存和6GBGeForce RTX 3050 GPU。我们的特定配置是低端SKU，在百思买零售价为1200美元。
Slim 7 Pro的竞争者包括其他中高档14英寸多媒体笔记本电脑，如 华硕VivoBook 14, Honor 魔法书系列,戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus 7420，或13.5英寸的HP Spectre x360 13.5.
更多联想评论：
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.2 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 R7 7735HS, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 | Alternative specs
USD 499.99
|
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | Alternative specs
USD 1,099.99
|
| 89.3 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.25 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | Alternative specs
USD 938.00
|
| 89.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.4 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | Alternative specs
USD 974.99
|
| 86.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | LG Gram 14Z90Q i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 980 g | 16.8 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | Alternative specs
USD 579.00
|
| 87.2 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 18.87 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 | Alternative specs
USD 889.95
|
外壳 - 同款超薄眼镜
笔记本电脑右边缘的USB-A端口和电源按钮的位置已经被调换。此外，沿左侧边缘的一个USB-C端口现在支持USB4，意味着与大多数外部GPU扩展坞的原生兼容性。否则，端口选项保持不变。
沟通
联发科Wi-Fi 6E MT7922标配6GHz Wi-Fi 6E和蓝牙5.1连接，而不是通常的英特尔AX系列。不幸的是，我们的特定审查单位会有问题识别我们的华硕AXE11000 Wi-Fi 6E网络，即使经过多次重试，所以我们只能记录其Wi-Fi 6性能。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
网络摄像头
200万像素网络摄像头、红外传感器和电子快门再次成为标准配置。然而，图像质量似乎比以前更模糊了。惠普的竞争机型，如 Spectre 13.5相比之下，惠普的竞争机型，如Spectre 13.5，配备了质量更高的5MP网络摄像头。
维护
底部面板只需一把Torx螺丝刀就能比较容易地拆下来。用户可以升级M.2固态硬盘和WLAN模块，而LPDDR5内存模块则被焊接起来。
显示器 - 2.5K 90 Hz标准
我们的评测单元采用了较低分辨率的2.5K 2560 x 1600面板，而不是去年的3K 3072 x 1920面板。Slim 7 Pro X即便如此，对比度也一样好，光面屏幕仍然非常清晰，没有颗粒感问题。响应时间稍快，重影也较少，但最大亮度略显暗淡；联想宣传2.5K面板的亮度为350尼特，而3K选项为400尼特。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 344.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 1112:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88, calibrated: 0.83
ΔE Greyscale 4.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
74.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 LEN89C1, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 CSOT T3 MNE507ZA1-1, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Samsung SDC4192 (ATNA40YK14-0), OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | LG Gram 14Z90Q LG LP140WU1-SPF1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 InfoVision 140NWHE, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -6% | 24% | 19% | 17% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 72.9 | 66 -9% | 99.9 37% | 99.8 37% | 98.4 35% | 68.8 -6% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.2 | 98.5 0% | 100 2% | 100 2% | 99.9 2% | 99.3 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 74.6 | 67.7 -9% | 98.3 32% | 88.7 19% | 85.9 15% | 69.5 -7% |
| Response Times | -42% | 96% | 90% | -38% | -11% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 31.8 ? | 42.8 ? -35% | 1.04 ? 97% | 2.4 ? 92% | 47.5 ? -49% | 32.8 ? -3% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 19.3 ? | 28.7 ? -49% | 0.95 ? 95% | 2.4 ? 88% | 24.5 ? -27% | 22.8 ? -18% |
| PWM Frequency | 360 ? | 300 | ||||
| Screen | 20% | 125% | 68% | -3% | 9% | |
| Brightness middle | 344.7 | 426.5 24% | 378 10% | 423 23% | 341 -1% | 331.1 -4% |
| Brightness | 334 | 414 24% | 379 13% | 427 28% | 305 -9% | 326 -2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 88 -4% | 98 7% | 98 7% | 87 -5% | 85 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.3 3% | 0.03 90% | 0.1 68% | 0.26 16% | 0.29 6% |
| Contrast | 1112 | 1422 28% | 12600 1033% | 4230 280% | 1312 18% | 1142 3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.01 | 2.07 31% | 2.5 17% | 0.55 82% | 3.11 -3% | 2.23 26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.3 | 4.76 24% | 4.7 25% | 1.15 82% | 8.29 -32% | 5.44 14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.83 | 0.63 24% | 1.9 -129% | 1.15 -39% | 0.83 -0% | 0.63 24% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 3.2 30% | 1.9 59% | 0.69 85% | 5.3 -15% | 3.6 22% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.18 101% | 2.2 100% | 2.42 91% | 2.037 108% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6420 101% | 6142 106% | 6222 104% | 6479 100% | 7571 86% | 6022 108% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -9% /
6% | 82% /
99% | 59% /
61% | -8% /
-4% | -2% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
虽然它开箱后的校准效果并不差，但色彩准确性还有待提高，特别是由于它完全覆盖了sRGB。默认情况下，平均灰度和色彩DeltaE值分别为4.6和3.01。在用X-Rite色度计进行适当校准后，我们能够将这些DeltaE值分别减少到1.4和0.83。用户可以应用我们上面的校准过的ICM配置文件来提高色彩准确性。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 31.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8549 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
室外能见度在阴凉处是可以接受的，因为那里的眩光是可以容忍的。如果在较亮的条件下，眩光会变得更难以忽视，屏幕上的内容会显得过于冲淡。惠普在一些14英寸EliteBook机型上提供了亮度超过2倍的显示屏。 14英寸EliteBook机型如果户外能见度是一个问题的话。
性能 - 新Ryzen 7 7735HS CPU
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前，我们通过Windows将我们的设备设置为性能模式，并通过联想Vantage设置为极限性能模式。联想今年重新设计了其Vantage软件，因此所有的设置和切换都被重新安排，令人厌烦。例如，三个性能配置文件被放在两个不同的子菜单下。
高级优化和G-Sync不被支持。
我们的设备遇到了一个错误，系统有时不能正确地从睡眠中唤醒。然后需要硬重启。
处理器
与高端Zen 4一样令人印象深刻 Ryzen 7 7945HX可能是令人印象深刻的，较小的中端Zen 3 Ryzen 7 7735HS感觉像是去年的Ryzen 7 6800H的简单重塑。 Ryzen 7 6800H.多线程性能介于较慢的Ryzen 9 6900HS和较快的 酷睿i7-12700H.单线程性能更令人失望，它落后于Core i7-12700H 30%的差距。即使是更省电的英特尔 酷睿i7-1260P在单线程工作负载中也能超过Ryzen 7 7735HS。
尽管如此，性能的可持续性还是非常好。当循环运行CineBench R15 xT时，最终得分将在整个过程中保持稳定，而戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus中的Core i7-12700H则是一个很好的例子。 戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus或Alienware x14中的酷睿i7-12700H将经历更陡峭的性能下降，如下面的对比图所示。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
系统性能
PCMark结果略低于去年使用酷睿i7-12700H的型号，因为第12代英特尔CPU仍然是比我们的Ryzen 7 7735HS更快的整体处理器。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6437 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (30324 - 52012, n=15) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示，在打开我们的主页的多个浏览器标签时存在DPC问题。在我们长达1分钟的测试视频中，以60 FPS播放4K视频也是不完美的，有4个丢帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 只有一个驱动器
我们的测试装置带有一个1TBSK Hynix PC801PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘，连续读取和写入速度分别高达7200 MB/s和5000 MB/s，对三星PM9A1系列具有竞争力。性能的可持续性非常好，在压力下不会随着时间的推移出现节流现象。安装了一个固态硬盘热垫，帮助散热到底部面板。
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - 6GBGeForce RTX 3050
的 移动GeForce RTX 3050是Nvidia更令人失望的GPU之一，因为它的性能甚至比 GTX 1660 Ti多达15%。它当然比目前市场上的任何集成解决方案要好，但你的老 GeForce RTX 2060游戏笔记本电脑仍将轻松胜过移动RTX 3050。与4GB版本相比，我们的6GB版本只快了约5%。
值得注意的是，联想宣传的TGP为58W，而Nvidia控制中心声称为63W。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ -1! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G5-21DE003RGE -1! | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF -1! | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng -1! | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR -1! | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 -1! | |
| Honor MagicBook 14 2022 -1! | |
| Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21AJS00400 -1! | |
| Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 -1! | |
| LG Gram 14Z90Q -1! | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 17223 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 11330 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5182 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Slim Pro 7能够运行现代游戏，尽管它不是一台游戏笔记本电脑。尽管如此，相对较高的2.5K原生分辨率和较弱的GPU使该系统最适合玩要求不高的多人游戏，如《DOTA 2》或《守望先锋》 ，而不是图形密集型游戏。较新的单人游戏如《Returnal》 很难运行，除非将设置降低到900p或1080p。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 163.4 | 119.5 | 63.8 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 236 | 96.5 | 52.9 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 117.3 | 112.6 | 104.4 | 98 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 128.5 | 70.3 | 51.2 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 86.7 | 76 | 61.6 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 80.8 | 64.2 | 46.4 | 38.5 |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 113.3 | 89.7 | 59.2 | 46.4 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 163.5 | 151.5 | 109.7 | 33.6 |
| Returnal (2023) | 40 | 38 | 34 | 29 |
排放
系统噪音 - 迅速上升
在桌面上闲置时，风扇噪音为22.8 dB(A)，但在浏览网页或视频流时，它更经常徘徊在26 dB(A)左右。当更高的负载被引入时，它变得相当快，可能是因为薄的设计、H系列CPU和RTX级GPU。例如，当运行3DMark 06时，风扇在测试的60秒内就达到了44 dB(A)。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 22.8 / 22.8 / 22.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 43.8 / 47.1 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.7 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | LG Gram 14Z90Q Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | -3% | -13% | -0% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 22.7 | 23.2 -2% | 23.6 -4% | 24 -6% | 25 -10% | 23.2 -2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 22.8 | 23.3 -2% | 23.6 -4% | 24 -5% | 26 -14% | 23.2 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 22.8 | 23.3 -2% | 23.6 -4% | 24 -5% | 27 -18% | 23.2 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 22.8 | 23.3 -2% | 24.6 -8% | 35.71 -57% | 28 -23% | 23.2 -2% |
| Load Average * | 43.8 | 37.4 15% | 45 -3% | 35 20% | 47.5 -8% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.8 | 41.7 5% | 45 -3% | 40.22 8% | 36 18% | 51.7 -18% |
| Load Maximum * | 47.1 | 47.7 -1% | 45 4% | 51.93 -10% | 36 24% | 51.7 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于内部有对称的冷却解决方案，表面温度的发展是对称的。键盘中心最热的地方可以达到40摄氏度，这与我们在竞争产品上记录的情况相似。 戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus在类似条件下的温度。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.1 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.6 °C / 2.8 F).
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | LG Gram 14Z90Q Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -11% | 1% | -5% | -4% | 1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 42.2 | 41.6 1% | 39.7 6% | 42 -0% | 43 -2% | 40 5% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 49 | 49.2 -0% | 45.4 7% | 52 -6% | 45 8% | 36.4 26% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 24.4 | 29.8 -22% | 25.7 -5% | 26 -7% | 27 -11% | 27 -11% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25.2 | 31.2 -24% | 26.4 -5% | 27 -7% | 28 -11% | 29.2 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试 - 一个热的处理器
当运行Prime95时，CPU时钟速率和电路板功耗将分别飙升至3.8 GHz和52 W，然后随着时间的推移略微下降至3.6 GHz。然而，核心温度会非常高，达到100℃。
当运行 Witcher 3代表典型的游戏负载时，GPU时钟速率、温度和板卡功耗将分别稳定在1770 MHz、68 C和57 W。
| CPU时钟（GHz） | GPU时钟（MHz） | CPU平均温度（°C） | GPU平均温度（°C） | |
| 系统空闲 | -- | -- | 40 | 35 |
| Prime95压力 | 3.6 | -- | 100 | 58 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.8 - 3.4 | 1155 | 87 - 100 | 70 |
| Witcher 3 应力 | 1.8 | 1770 | 76 | 68 |
发言人
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - Zen 3+每瓦特性能
消耗功率
总体功耗几乎与我们在去年的Ryzen 9 6900HS型号上记录的相同。由于Ryzen 7 7735HS提供的性能与上面提到的大致相同，每瓦性能也大致保持不变。这些数据是有意义的，因为6900HS和7735HS的CPU都来自同一个Zen 3+系列。
当Prime95和FurMark都在运行时，我们能够从中小型（12.2 x 6.2 x 2.7厘米）140瓦的交流适配器中记录到136瓦的最大功耗。请注意，这款笔记本电脑是少数几个配备140W USB-C交流适配器的产品之一，因为大多数USB-C适配器的额定功率最多为100W。
| Off / Standby | 0.07 / 0.09 Watt |
| Idle | 7.6 / 12.2 / 12.8 Watt |
| Load |
76.5 / 135.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 R7 7735HS, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | LG Gram 14Z90Q i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | 23% | 16% | 47% | -12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7.6 | 7.4 3% | 7.8 -3% | 7.4 3% | 3 61% | 6.3 17% |
| Idle Average * | 12.2 | 11 10% | 9.3 24% | 8.3 32% | 6 51% | 10.3 16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 12.8 | 15 -17% | 9.8 23% | 8.7 32% | 12 6% | 20 -56% |
| Load Average * | 76.5 | 81.6 -7% | 62.8 18% | 76 1% | 40 48% | 106.2 -39% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 89.5 | 90 -1% | 46.5 48% | 70 22% | 36.5 59% | 96.1 -7% |
| Load Maximum * | 135.7 | 105.6 22% | 96 29% | 132 3% | 63 54% | 136.5 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
联想似乎已经解决了围绕Slim 7 Pro系列的电池问题。我们能够记录超过10小时的实际WLAN使用时间，或者当两个单位都设置为相同的平衡电源配置文件时，比去年的AMD模型长了近2倍。此外，现在从空电到满电的充电速度更快，约为90分钟，而上一代机型为2至3小时。
| Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8 R7 7735HS, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED BMF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 63 Wh | LG Gram 14Z90Q i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 72 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 64 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -44% | -25% | -27% | 13% | -31% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 628 | 351 -44% | 472 -25% | 457 -27% | 712 13% | 432 -31% |
| H.264 | 651 | |||||
| Load | 81 | 92 | 169 | 54 | ||
| Reader / Idle | 678 | 1736 | 712 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 新的处理器，同样的性能
年复一年的更新有时会带来性能上的重大改进，但更多时候只是带来最小的升级。不幸的是，2023年的Slim Pro 7在涉及到对去年的模型的改进时，是最小的。Ryzen 7 7735HS CPU和6 GBGeForce RTX 3050 GPU的性能几乎与老款Core i7-12700H和4 GB RTX 3050的性能相同。只有一小部分用户能真正受益于新的USB4支持和实际场景中额外的2GB的VRAM。
机箱的外观和感觉仍然很好，但新的CPU和GPU只是去年选项的翻版，在性能上没有明显的同比增长。
2023型号的最佳部分是 旧的2022型号因此现在更便宜了。由于它们的性能几乎相同，并带有类似的显示选项，用户有可能通过选择视觉上相同的2022型号而节省几百美元。
Lenovo Slim Pro 7 14ARP8
- 04/16/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
