联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16 G9 笔记本电脑评测:配备 1200 尼特和酷睿 9 处理器的 MiniLED 笔记本电脑
Yoga Pro 9i 16 是联想最好的消费类多媒体笔记本电脑。凭借高分辨率 mini LED 面板和良好的性能,它成为 2023 年最佳多媒体设备之一。对于新的 G9 机型,它有了一些变化,包括采用了英特尔最新的流星湖处理器,并将迷你 LED 面板从反射式改成了哑光式,亮度可达 1200 尼特。显卡从GeForce RTX 4000 型号到 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑配备 100 瓦 TGP。
我们的测试设备(型号为 83DN006HGE)是高端型号,售价 2700 欧元(约合人民币 2875 元),包含 酷睿至尊 9 185H和 GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑以及 32 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 和明亮的迷你 LED 面板。性能较弱的型号配备 酷睿至尊 7 155H和 GeForce RTX 4060 笔记本电脑的价格为 2300 欧元(2450 美元),但其他硬件完全相同。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.7 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
88.6 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Dell XPS 16 9640 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 18.7 mm | 16.30" | 3840x2400 | |
90 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 17.9 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 | |
90.4 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 17 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.6 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Framework Laptop 16 R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7700S | 2.4 kg | 20.95 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.6 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.6 kg | 17.1 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 铝和薄底板
表壳设计与旧款 旧机型深灰色(也有绿松石色)的铝制外壳看起来不错,但与目前的 IdeaPad Pro 16 在视觉上没有太大区别。设计看起来很现代,只有大尺寸的摄像头驼峰多少会扰乱人们的印象。
在质量方面,测试设备给人的总体印象不错。只有仍然很薄的底板偶尔会发出嘎吱嘎吱的声音。不过,底座本身非常稳固,只有中间区域在受到压力时会有轻微变形。屏幕盖的弹性稍好一些,但我们无法看到任何图像失真。铰链调节良好,最大开启角度为 180 度。
Yoga Pro 的重量刚刚超过 2 千克,位于中场位置,但占地面积比新的 戴尔 XPS 16为例。170 瓦的电源重 566 克。
设备 - Thunderbolt 4 和 HDMI 2.1
虽然去年的型号在 HDMI 端口方面仍有局限,但现在已配备了现代的 HDMI 2.1 端口。此外,还配备了 Thunderbolt 4 和足够的 USB 端口。所有视频输出都通过 iGPU 连接,因此在使用外接显示器时,GeForce GPU 无需一直运行,从而降低了功耗。
SD 读卡器
右侧的读卡器与我们的参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60)配合使用时,平均传输速率为 80-90 MB/s。插入的卡突出机壳约 1.5 厘米。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
交流
英特尔的 AX211 WLAN 模块采用焊接工艺,支持 WiFi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3。在测试中,我们没有发现 WLAN 稳定性方面的问题,而且与华硕的参考路由器配合使用,传输速率总体上非常不错。联想没有提供 WiFi 7 模块。
Networking | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
网络摄像头
500 万像素摄像头可提供不错的图像质量,还有一个红外传感器,可通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。结合处理器的 NPU,某些工作室效果(模糊、头部跟踪等)可直接在 Windows 中使用,与应用程序无关。网络摄像头有一个电子快门,按钮位于机身右侧。
维护
底盖用 Torx 螺钉(T5)固定,易于拆卸。内部布局与旧款相比有所改变,部分原因是为了给更大的电池腾出空间。内存和 WLAN 模块仍采用焊接方式。M.2 2280 固态硬盘仍有两个插槽,你既可以清洁风扇,也可以更换电池(如有必要)。
输入设备 - 1.5 毫米行程和数字键盘
除了新的 Copilot 键(取代右侧的 Ctrl 键)外,输入设备保持不变。舒适的键盘具有足够长的键程(1.5 毫米),可以轻松输入长文本。两段式白色照明通过传感器自动启动。
点击板的尺寸保持不变,仍为 15 x 9.5 厘米,但联想似乎采纳了我们的批评意见,对机械结构进行了修改。旧型号的点击声听起来响亮而廉价,而现在的点击声则更加低沉,给人留下了非常优质的印象。滑动性能一如既往地出色。总的来说,点击板的可用性完全没有问题。
显示屏 - 哑光微型 LED 面板
联想为 Yoga Pro 9i 16 G9 提供了多种面板,我们的测试设备配备了分辨率为 3200 x 2000 的哑光迷你 LED 屏幕。我们测试的是光面触摸屏版本,分辨率为 3200 x 2000。 前代产品仍然可用。得益于高刷新率,屏幕的移动非常流畅,色彩也非常鲜艳。尽管是哑光显示屏,但即使是明亮的表面也不会出现颗粒感。微型 LED 面板以 4800 Hz 的恒定频率闪烁,这对绝大多数用户来说应该不成问题。响应时间比旧款稍慢,但在日常使用中不会出现重影。
迷你 LED 面板的表现与你想象的不同。在 SDR 模式下,该面板的功能与普通的 IPS 屏幕类似,这里的黑色并非全黑。平均亮度为 670 cd/m²,黑度较低,为 0.22 cd/m²,最大对比度略低于 3000:1。
只有当 HDR 模式启动时,面板才会切换到局部调光模式,此时黑色才是真正的黑色,不过在暗背景上的亮物体也会出现明显的光晕效果。HDR 的最大亮度为 1230 cd/m²,无论是在小幅图像上还是在几乎全白的图像上都是如此。这是一个典范,但 Windows 的 HDR 实现仍然存在问题:HDR 模式必须手动激活,而且不适合连续运行,因为正常的 SDR 内容(如 Windows 桌面)会比在 SDR 模式下显得苍白得多。
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 651 cd/m²
Contrast: 2959:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.6
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 LEN160-3.2K, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16" | Dell XPS 16 9640 SDC4196, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.3" | Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 TL160MDMP01, IPS, 3072x1920, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Framework Laptop 16 2560x1600, 16" | SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 LEN160-3.2K, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 2% | 1% | 0% | -16% | 3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97 | 98.3 1% | 98.8 2% | 98.6 2% | 97.7 1% | 68.8 -29% | 97 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.7 0% | 98.8 -1% | 99.8 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.6 | 87.8 1% | 89.1 3% | 88.5 2% | 87 0% | 70 -19% | 95.1 10% |
Response Times | 33% | 70% | 33% | 34% | 45% | 34% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 22.2 ? | 0.82 ? 96% | 6.3 ? 72% | 0.54 ? 98% | 14.6 ? 34% | 13.7 ? 38% | 14 ? 37% |
Response Time Black / White * | 17 ? | 0.85 ? 95% | 5.6 ? 67% | 0.69 ? 96% | 11.3 ? 34% | 8.1 ? 52% | 9.2 ? 46% |
PWM Frequency | 4840 ? | 360 ? -93% | 240 ? -95% | 5800 ? 20% | |||
Screen | -11% | -30% | 3% | -23% | -57% | 11% | |
Brightness middle | 651 | 366 -44% | 551 -15% | 390 -40% | 504.8 -22% | 384 -41% | 539 -17% |
Brightness | 673 | 367 -45% | 524 -22% | 393 -42% | 490 -27% | 371 -45% | 546 -19% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 96 3% | 91 -2% | 98 5% | 84 -10% | 88 -5% | 96 3% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.52 -136% | 0.41 -86% | 0.3 -36% | 0.18 18% | ||
Contrast | 2959 | 1060 -64% | 1231 -58% | 1280 -57% | 2994 1% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 1.3 32% | 1.7 11% | 1.4 26% | 1.23 35% | 3.4 -79% | 1.4 26% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.2 | 3.6 14% | 4.1 2% | 2.7 36% | 3.74 11% | 9.2 -119% | 2.1 50% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.6 | 1 -67% | 1 -67% | 1.1 -83% | 1.3 -117% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 2.2 27% | 2.4 20% | 2.1 30% | 2 33% | 3.4 -13% | 2.2 27% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.14 103% | 2.2 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.22 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.19 100% |
CCT | 6738 96% | 6680 97% | 6842 95% | 6431 101% | 6670 97% | 7462 87% | 6479 100% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 8% /
2% | 14% /
-9% | 12% /
10% | 4% /
-10% | -9% /
-34% | 16% /
14% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)对面板进行了分析,我们惊讶地发现联想 Vantage 软件不再提供不同色彩空间的色彩配置文件。联想仍在宣传 AdobeRGB,但唯一可用的配置文件是 P3 色彩空间。这种限制的原因尚不清楚,但绝对令人讨厌。开箱即用的显示屏已经相当不错了,但我们还是通过自己的校准(配置文件可在上面免费下载)大大提高了画质。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.2 ms rise | |
↘ 8.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
22.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.6 ms rise | |
↘ 12.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 4840 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 4840 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 4840 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
哑光版微型 LED 面板在户外的表现自然要好于反光触摸屏。如果避免直接光源的反射,该设备在非常明亮的环境中使用也没有问题。可视角度的稳定性也无可挑剔。
性能 - 配备高级优化处理器的 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑
联想为 Yoga Pro 9i 16 G9 专门配备了英特尔新款流星湖处理器(酷睿 Ultra 7 或 9)和两款GeForce RTX 4060/4070 笔记本电脑型号。标配 32 GB 内存(LPDDR5x-7467),但如果选择 酷睿至尊 9 185H.
测试条件
联想提供了各种能耗配置文件,我们在下表中总结了相应的 TDP/TGP 值。我们在性能 模式下进行了基准测试和测量。
能源概况 | CPU 负载 | CB R23 Multi | GPU 负载 | Time Spy 图形 | 赛博朋克 2077 QHD Ultra |
最大风扇容量 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
电池 | 40 -> 30 瓦 | 12,824 点 | 22 瓦 | 2,655 点 | 10.3 FPS | 30.9 dB(A) |
自动 | 78 -> 65 瓦 | 18,849 点 | 65 瓦 | 10,032 点 | 38.6 FPS | 44.9 dB(A) |
性能 | 115 -> 80 瓦 | 点 | 100 瓦 | 12,181 点 | 47.8 FPS | 53.9 dB(A) |
处理器 - Core Ultra 9 185H
核心 Core Ultra 9 185H的继任者 酷睿 i9-13900H提供 16 个内核(22 个线程)。与 酷睿至尊 7 155H、185H 的最大时钟频率高达 5.1 GHz。得益于较高的功耗限制,性能表现非常不错,但你也可以看到,多核性能仅比老款 Raptor Lake 芯片略胜一筹。在所有 CPU 基准测试中,酷睿至尊 9 平均仅比前代酷睿 i7-13705H 领先 2%。在持续负载情况下,性能也非常稳定。
在电池模式下,处理器的最大功耗为 80 瓦,因此性能仅略低于电源模式。更多的 CPU 基准测试可在我们的 技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) -2! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (12688 - 19851, n=18) | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1166 - 1912, n=18) | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Framework Laptop 16 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4843 - 7651, n=18) | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (442 - 735, n=18) | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1582 - 3165, n=20) | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (191.9 - 281, n=18) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (163 - 285, n=18) | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (51738 - 76331, n=18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4199 - 5781, n=18) |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 25760, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9140 - 14540, n=18) | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1490 - 2573, n=18) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9330 - 14230, n=18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (986 - 1902, n=18) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (14.1 - 22.7, n=18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (34.5 - 62, n=18) | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (0.4313 - 0.759, n=19) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9220 - 18676, n=18) | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (48865 - 96463, n=18) | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (2394 - 4534, n=18) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (66785 - 95241, n=18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (7255 - 11392, n=18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (24004 - 48020, n=18) | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (53116 - 154066, n=18) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (678 - 1341, n=18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Framework Laptop 16 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4428 - 10078, n=18) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (44809 - 53918, n=18) | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) |
系统性能
Yoga Pro 9i 16 的合成基准测试结果很好,在日常使用中速度非常快。只是在切换到专用显卡时会有短暂的延迟,但这对于配备高级优化处理器的设备来说是正常的。在系统性能测试中没有发现其他问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7490 - 7761, n=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10192 - 11133, n=3) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9067 - 9435, n=3) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (11369 - 13194, n=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1663 - 1917, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Framework Laptop 16 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1573 - 1849, n=3) | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Framework Laptop 16 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1872 - 2008, n=3) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1338 - 1856, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=87, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (240 - 295, n=3) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (248 - 268, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (494 - 526, n=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=91, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7547 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (69929 - 95718, n=18) | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (64619 - 87768, n=18) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Framework Laptop 16 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (51114 - 93871, n=18) | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (121.4 - 259, n=18) | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试(网页浏览、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,我们的测试设备在当前 BIOS 版本下运行实时音频应用程序没有任何问题。虽然有一个驱动程序有点问题,但重要的 "中断到进程延迟 "值非常低。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
联想在我们的测试设备中安装了一块来自 SK Hynix 的 1 TB PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘,其中 877 GB 在首次启动时可用。虽然基准测试结果一般,但这在日常使用中不成问题。至少在持续负载下性能依然稳定。Yoga Pro 还为 PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘提供了第二个插槽。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
在专用显卡方面没有任何变化,因为 Yoga Pro 仍可配备 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060 笔记本电脑或 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑。不过,现在集成了用于图形切换的高级 Optimus,而旧型号则没有。在我们的测试设备中安装了速度更快的 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑,其 TGP 为 100 瓦,基准测试结果整体上非常不错。显卡还可以选择超频。
Yoga 在游戏基准测试中也表现出色,即使是现代游戏也能以 QHD 分辨率下的最高细节进行游戏,而且在长时间游戏过程中性能保持完全稳定。
在电池模式下,显卡的最大功率为 65 瓦,因此性能降低了约 18%。更多 GPU 基准测试请参见我们的 技术部分.
3DMark 11 Performance | 34118 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 26981 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 12105 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Average of class Multimedia (19 - 105, n=46, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18 - 30, n=64) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 181, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 181, n=66) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Average of class Multimedia (167 - 946, n=87, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (158 - 440, n=63) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) | |
Framework Laptop 16 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=81, last 2 years) |
Horizon Forbidden West | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (53.2 - 76.7, n=9) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 | |
Average of class Multimedia (12.4 - 65.4, n=5, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (40.3 - 59.1, n=8) | |
Average of class Multimedia (40.3 - 56.1, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 16 9640 |
Witcher 3 FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 171.4 | 110.9 | 90.4 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 242 | 107.8 | 89 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 171.7 | 155.7 | 148.1 | 139 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 189.6 | 156.2 | 115.7 | 85.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 133.9 | 118.7 | 90.5 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 156 | 133 | 130 | 116 | 109 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 418 | 300 | 244 | 213 | 139 |
F1 23 (2023) | 229 | 239 | 209 | 68.9 | 44 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 166.3 | 136.6 | 119.9 | 117.7 | 79.8 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 129.6 | 106.8 | 90.5 | 76.9 | 47.8 |
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 110.5 | 104.2 | 75.4 | 65.4 | 56.1 |
排放 - 大功率风扇、顶部扬声器
噪音
在空闲模式和低负载情况下,大多数情况下风扇保持关闭或几乎听不到声音。但在负载情况下,无论是自动 模式还是性能 模式,风扇的声音都会迅速变大。我们在下表中总结了各种能耗曲线的结果。在电池模式下,设备始终保持非常安静,但性能大幅降低,不再足以满足游戏需求。我们的测试设备没有检测到线圈啸叫等电子噪音
能量曲线 | 3DMark 06 | Witcher 3 | 赛博朋克 2077 | 压力测试 |
---|---|---|---|---|
电池 | 29.5 dB(A) | 29.5 dB(A) | 29.5 dB(A) | 30.9 dB(A) |
自动 | 44.9 dB(A) | 44.9 dB(A) | 44.9 dB(A) | 44.9 dB(A) |
性能 | 48.1 dB(A) | 49.7 dB(A) | 49.7 dB(A) | 53.9 dB(A) |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.3 / 24.3 / 25.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 48.1 / 53.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.3 dB(A) |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | Dell XPS 16 9640 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Framework Laptop 16 Radeon RX 7700S, R9 7940HS, WDC PC SN810 1TB | SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 2% | 10% | 9% | 7% | -7% | -0% | |
off / environment * | 24.3 | 24.5 -1% | 24 1% | 24.2 -0% | 23.8 2% | 25.9 -7% | 24.7 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.3 | 24.5 -1% | 24 1% | 24.2 -0% | 23.9 2% | 25.9 -7% | 24.7 -2% |
Idle Average * | 24.3 | 24.5 -1% | 24 1% | 24.2 -0% | 23.9 2% | 25.9 -7% | 26.2 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.8 | 27.5 -7% | 27.2 -5% | 24.2 6% | 23.9 7% | 32 -24% | 26.2 -2% |
Load Average * | 48.1 | 39.6 18% | 29 40% | 37.9 21% | 28.5 41% | 47.2 2% | 39.7 17% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.7 | 49.7 -0% | 42.1 15% | 41.7 16% | 51.9 -4% | 53.1 -7% | 53.2 -7% |
Load Maximum * | 53.9 | 49.7 8% | 45 17% | 41.7 23% | 53.7 -0% | 53.1 1% | 53.2 1% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在执行简单的任务时,机箱仍能保持凉爽,负载情况下的最高温度也略低。不过,用户很可能会注意到底部温度超过 45 °C,因此不建议将设备放在大腿上。键盘和底座的温度仍然很低。在 CPU/GPU 综合负载压力测试中,显卡的持续运行功耗约为 87 瓦,处理器为 42 瓦。总体而言,性能非常稳定。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.2 °C / -4 F).
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Framework Laptop 16 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7700S | SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 4% | 9% | 10% | -3% | -7% | -3% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.7 | 39.4 6% | 39.7 5% | 38.5 8% | 42.4 -2% | 46.7 -12% | 41.6 -0% |
Maximum Bottom * | 46.3 | 36.9 20% | 42.9 7% | 41.2 11% | 40.8 12% | 54.1 -17% | 50 -8% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.2 | 28.2 -8% | 23.7 10% | 23.5 10% | 31.4 -20% | 26.5 -1% | 26.8 -2% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.2 | 27.4 -1% | 23.5 14% | 24.1 11% | 27.8 -2% | 26.8 1% | 27.9 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
配备 6 个模块的音响系统仍然是多媒体领域最好的机型之一,其性能优于许多竞争对手。在许多情况下,您可以不使用外置扬声器,但在游戏时,由于风扇声音较大,您将无法从扬声器中获益。建议使用耳机。
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 16 9640 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 电池容量更大,运行时间更长
耗电量
与前代产品相比,消耗量测量结果没有明显变化。 前.不过,这里还有一个问题:提供的 170 瓦电源不足以满足最大消耗量,设备必须使用电池。从下图中可以清楚地看到,这并不是短暂的,而是持续的。在压力测试中,电池容量在 75 分钟内下降了 12%。虽然我们的压力测试是最糟糕的情况,而且并非所有用户都会使用 "性能 "模式,但这显然是个问题,联想在这里是在偷工减料。Yoga Pro 9i 16 应该配备至少 200 瓦的电源。
Off / Standby | 0.2 / 0.83 Watt |
Idle | 10.3 / 21.9 / 22.4 Watt |
Load |
96.9 / 173.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16" | Dell XPS 16 9640 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.3" | Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00, IPS, 3072x1920, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Framework Laptop 16 R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7700S, WDC PC SN810 1TB, , 2560x1600, 16" | SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 32% | 21% | 47% | 8% | 22% | -1% | -7% | 37% | |
Idle Minimum * | 10.3 | 7.7 25% | 5.2 50% | 4.8 53% | 9.5 8% | 8.6 17% | 10.9 -6% | 12.4 ? -20% | 6.54 ? 37% |
Idle Average * | 21.9 | 10.3 53% | 14.4 34% | 7.5 66% | 17 22% | 12 45% | 22.6 -3% | 17.5 ? 20% | 11.3 ? 48% |
Idle Maximum * | 22.4 | 10.6 53% | 15.4 31% | 7.9 65% | 17.2 23% | 12.4 45% | 23.5 -5% | 24.2 ? -8% | 13.3 ? 41% |
Load Average * | 96.9 | 76.5 21% | 105.4 -9% | 79.3 18% | 96.2 1% | 80 17% | 84.6 13% | 97.6 ? -1% | 70.7 ? 27% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 159.6 | 126.4 21% | 107.6 33% | 79.2 50% | 171.9 -8% | 147.7 7% | 159.5 -0% | ||
Load Maximum * | 173.8 | 138.5 20% | 195.2 -12% | 125 28% | 175.7 -1% | 173.1 -0% | 177.3 -2% | 222 ? -28% | 116.1 ? 33% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
电池续航时间并不是旧机型的优势之一,这也是由于显示屏非常明亮。因此,联想将新款 G9 的电池容量从 75 瓦增至 84 瓦,从而提高了续航时间。特别是在亮度调整为 150 cd/m² 的情况下,新款 Yoga 的表现更出色,尽管竞争对手往往仍有优势。在 WLAN 测试中,我们测得在 60 Hz 时的运行时间为 8:46 小时(165 Hz 时约为 7.5 小时),但在全 SDR 亮度和 60 Hz 时仅为 4.5 小时(165 Hz 时为 4:10 小时)。在视频测试中,它的运行时间为 11.5 小时,表现非常出色,但在全亮度条件下,HDR 视频的运行时间仅为 2:40 小时,而在全负载条件下,它的运行时间在 73 分钟后结束。在设备开启的情况下,充满电需要 96 分钟。
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh | Dell XPS 16 9640 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.5 Wh | Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 75 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Framework Laptop 16 R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7700S, 85 Wh | SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 75 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 27% | 11% | 29% | 15% | -13% | -34% | 26% | |
H.264 | 692 | 988 43% | 784 13% | 1076 55% | 470 -32% | 449 -35% | 847 ? 22% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 526 | 629 20% | 734 40% | 656 25% | 548 4% | 467 -11% | 385 -27% | 640 ? 22% |
Load | 73 | 87 19% | 58 -21% | 78 7% | 92 26% | 77 5% | 44 -40% | 97.1 ? 33% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - Yoga Pro 9i 16 G9 不仅有改进之处
联想在多个方面改进了 Yoga Pro 9i 16 G9 多媒体笔记本。它安装了现代化的 HDMI 端口,搭载了高级 Optimus,并改进了 ClickPad 的机械结构。此外,电池容量更大了,续航时间也略有改善,但如果你把迷你 LED 面板的亮度调到最高,就不要指望会有奇迹发生了。
在性能方面,Yoga 依然表现出色,但新的 Core Ultra 9 185H但与旧款 Raptor Lake 芯片相比,新款酷睿 Ultra 9 185H 在性能上没有任何优势。游戏性能稳定,雾面迷你 LED 屏幕看起来非常不错,尤其是在 HDR 内容方面。但问题是,联想不再提供 sRGB 和 AdobeRGB 色彩配置文件,而旧款产品则是如此。
联想在 Yoga Pro 9 16 G9 中再次提供了一款非常出色的多媒体笔记本,它拥有快速的组件和极其明亮的迷你 LED 面板。不过,该机也存在一些缺点,如风扇噪音大、供电能力较弱以及在显示屏亮度达到最大值时电池续航时间较短。
在负载情况下,冷却风扇的声音仍然很大,电源供应不足也是一个问题,因为 Yoga 在长时间负载的情况下必须不断地使用电池。不过,总的来说,Yoga 的优点要多于缺点,而且在 Windows 领域,Yoga 的迷你 LED 面板几乎没有任何竞争对手。OLED 面板的亮度远不及 Yoga Pro,但 Windows 不佳的 HDR 实施仍然是个问题。尽管如此,Yoga Pro 仍明显优于其他多媒体竞争对手,如新的 戴尔 XPS 16 9640、尤其是在性能方面。
价格和供应情况
新款 Yoga Pro 9 16 G9 可以直接从联想公司进行配置和订购,基本型号的起价不到 1500 美元。
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9
- 04/20/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.