Notebookcheck Logo

戴尔 XPS 16 9640 评测--配备 4K OLED 和恼人触控条的多媒体笔记本电脑

设计重于性能

XPS 16 9640 是戴尔新推出的多媒体旗舰产品,取代了老款 XPS 15。除了更大的 16 英寸显示屏外,它还采用了当前的流星湖处理器和GeForce 显卡,但遗憾的是,其 GPU 性能尤其一般。
AI

戴尔公司用两款新机型取代了其著名的多媒体笔记本电脑 XPS 15:首先是更小巧的 XPS 14。-我们已经对它进行了全面测试,它的概念为我们揭示了许多问题。今天,我们将看看更大的 16 英寸机型,即 XPS 16。一般来说,它的配方是相同的,除了英特尔的新流星湖处理器外,它还使用了 Nvidia 的专用显卡,但这次也是 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的更强大型号。另外还有一些不同之处,我们将在本次评测中详细讨论。

我们的测试设备配置精良,采用Core Ultra 7 155HRTX 4070 笔记本电脑 、32 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 以及高分辨率 OLED 触摸屏,售价 2899 美元。因此,XPS 16 与其他高品质多媒体笔记本电脑和游戏/多媒体混合型产品竞争,如ROG Zephyrus G16

Dell XPS 16 9640 (XPS 16 9600 Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 100 W PL2 / Short Burst, 85 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2300 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 60 W TDP, GDDR6, 551.86, Advanced Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, LPDDR5x-7467, Dual-Channel, onboard, max. 64 GB
Display
16.30 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 139 PPI, capacitive, SDC4196, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, 1024 GB 
, 834 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 3 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18.7 x 358.18 x 240
Battery
99.5 Wh Lithium-Ion, 6-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Quad speakers (10W), Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 130W PSU, Mini-Docking station (USB-A, HDMI), 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.313 kg, Power Supply: 410 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
88.6 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Dell XPS 16 9640
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg18.7 mm16.30"3840x2400
90.4 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg17 mm16.00"2880x1800
90 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg17.9 mm16.00"3072x1920
92.3 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg16.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg18.2 mm16.00"3200x2000
88.6 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1.6 kg17.1 mm16.00"2560x1600
90.3 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3456x2160

外壳 - 坚固的铝制外壳

戴尔为当前 XPS 系列的所有三个变体采用了相同的基本设计,其灵感来源于 XPS 13 Plus及其宽大、连续的玻璃掌托和包括触摸条在内的非同寻常的键盘。除了我们的浅色版本,戴尔还提供深灰色版本的笔记本电脑。它的四边边框都很纤薄,外观现代感十足。由于占地面积较大,XPS 16 看起来不像较小的 XPS 14 那么笨重。 较小的 XPS 14.

我们的测试设备在 USB-C 端口之间有一个小缺陷。
我们的测试设备在 USB-C 端口之间有一个小缺陷。

不过,我们注意到测试设备左侧的两个 USB-C 端口之间有一个小缺陷。屏幕也非常稳定,在调整打开角度(最大 135 度)时,盖子只会轻微弹起。不过,由于正面边缘的形状,单手很难打开盖子。

如前所述,16 英寸机型的新设计看起来比 XPS 14 更漂亮,与竞争对手相比也没有什么大的差别,尤其是在占地面积和机壳厚度方面。与目前的 Yoga Pro 9 16 2024(见下面的对比图片)相比,XPS 的优势在于边框更纤薄。不过,XPS 16 的重量为 2.313 千克,仍然是我们对比组中最重的设备。

戴尔 XPS 16 9640 对比联想 Yoga Pro 9 16 2024
戴尔 XPS 16 9640 对比联想 Yoga Pro 9 16 2024

潜在的竞争对手比较 尺寸比较

362.5 mm 245 mm 18.2 mm 2.2 kg358.18 mm 240 mm 18.7 mm 2.3 kg355 mm 250 mm 17 mm 1.8 kg354 mm 241 mm 17.9 mm 1.9 kg353.7 mm 245.3 mm 17.1 mm 1.6 kg354 mm 246 mm 16.4 mm 1.8 kg345 mm 230 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 最快的 XPS 16,仅配备 2x Thunderbolt 4

XPS 16 的连接选项与较小的 XPS 14戴尔将额外的空间留作闲置。总共有 3 个 USB-C 端口和一个读卡器,仅此而已。更糟糕的是,配备快速 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的机型只有左侧的两个端口支持 Thunderbolt 4,而右侧仅支持 USB-C 3.2 Gen 2。相比之下,速度较慢机型的三个端口均支持 Thunderbolt 4。此外,所有 USB-C 输出均通过 iGPU 连接。供货范围还包括一个带有 USB-A 端口和 HDMI 输出的小型扩展坞。

左:2x USB-C 4.0,带 Thunderbolt 4(40 GBit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery)
左:2x USB-C 4.0,带 Thunderbolt 4(40 GBit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery)
右:microSD 读卡器、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2(10 GBit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery)、3.5 毫米音频
右:microSD 读卡器、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2(10 GBit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery)、3.5 毫米音频

SD 读卡器

microSD 读卡器(弹簧装置)位于设备的右侧,几乎可以完全读取紧凑型存储卡。与我们的参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60)配合使用时,其传输速率最高可达 204 MB/s,而在复制图像文件时,我们测得的传输速率为 148 MB/s。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
153.8 MB/s +4%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
148 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years)
102.1 MB/s -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
78.8 MB/s -47%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
78.7 MB/s -47%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
74.6 MB/s -50%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
23.3 MB/s -84%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
204.3 MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182 MB/s -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years)
142.7 MB/s -30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
89.9 MB/s -56%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
87.2 MB/s -57%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
82.9 MB/s -59%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
26.1 MB/s -87%

交流

与较小的 XPS 14相比,戴尔在 XPS 16 中安装了英特尔的 Wi-Fi-7 模块。它还支持蓝牙 5.4。我们还不能测试它的 Wi-Fi 7 性能,但结合我们的华硕参考路由器,它的性能比 XPS 14 的 Wi-Fi 6E 模块稍差一些。尽管如此,你应该不会注意到任何限制,在测试过程中,我们没有发现任何连接问题。

Networking
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1580 (min: 1483) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1591 (min: 1476) MBit/s ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1625 (min: 1476) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1715 (min: 1675) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1648 (min: 1598) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1681 (min: 1645) MBit/s ∼98%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1654 (min: 1599) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1600 (min: 1564) MBit/s ∼93%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1618 (min: 1527) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1547 (min: 1409) MBit/s ∼90%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1630 (min: 1571) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1687 (min: 1665) MBit/s ∼98%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
894 (min: 804) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1235 (min: 676) MBit/s ∼72%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Dell XPS 16 9640; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1580 (1483-1663)
Dell XPS 16 9640; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1590 (1476-1622)

网络摄像头

戴尔在显示屏顶部边框安装了一个 1080p 网络摄像头,另外还有一个红外摄像头,用于通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。在光线充足的条件下,网络摄像头的质量还不错。此外,作为操作系统的一部分,摄像头还支持工作室特效(背景柔焦、眼球跟踪、自动取景),这意味着无论当前使用的是什么应用程序,它都能正常工作。

ColorChecker
18 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
20 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
14 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Dell XPS 16 9640: 11.65 ∆E min: 2.75 - max: 20 ∆E

维护

机箱底盖通过 Torx 螺钉(T5)固定,可以轻松取下。内部结构主要是冷却装置和电池。你只能对 M.2-2280 固态硬盘进行维护和清洁笔记本的风扇,此外,如果需要,你还可以更换电池。所有其他组件,包括无线局域网模块和内存,都是焊接上去的。

内部建设
内部建设

输入设备 - 键盘需要一些时间适应,功能键也很恼人

正如前面提到的 XPS 14戴尔还在较大的 XPS 16 机型上采用了与旧款 XPS 13 Plus 相同的键盘设计,各个按键之间没有空隙。它没有数字键盘,键盘旁边的空间用于笔记本的扬声器。键盘本身略微凹陷,打字时感觉非常舒适,按键精准。不过,我们也注意到了偶尔出现的问题,因为我们经常会不小心按错键,所以你肯定需要一些时间来适应这个键盘。我们还发现,用较大的手指敲击细小的垂直方向键很不方便,而且较大按键(空格键、回车键)的敲击声也更大。电源键位于右上方(包括指纹扫描仪),而你通常会认为删除键应该在这里,这就带来了下一个问题。

功能键被安装成了触摸条,这不仅没有为用户增加任何附加价值,而且还相当恼人。因此,你甚至不能盲目地点击删除键,而必须一直看着按键。它的背光也同样令人讨厌,因为它在不活动时会关闭,但在连续观看视频数小时后却不会关闭,即使你没有触碰任何按键。此外,当背光关闭时,你不知道该按哪里,这意味着你可能会按错键,直到背光重新激活。白色背光本身是通过传感器不断调整的,你根本无法影响其强度,至少我们找不到影响强度的选项。传感器也不关心你之前是否手动关闭了背光,一旦光线条件发生变化,背光就会被重新激活。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘背光
键盘背光
红外图像显示了触摸板的尺寸。
红外图像显示了触摸板的尺寸。

触摸板完全与掌托融为一体,没有明显的边界。触摸板使用掌托的整个高度,宽度从左 Fn 键的中心延伸到左箭头键的中心。总的来说,触摸板运行良好,点击均匀流畅,但如果离开触摸板区域或开始动作时稍稍偏离实际触摸板区域,我们偶尔会遇到一些问题。不过,与触摸条相比,这只是一个小问题。选配的 OLED 面板也配备了电容式触摸屏,而且效果非常好。

显示屏 - 90-Hz 4K OLED

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

戴尔为其新款 XPS 16 提供两种不同的 16.3 英寸反射面板。标准配置是不带触摸屏的 1080p 型号(500 cd/m²),但只需额外支付 300 美元,就可以获得三星公司提供的分辨率为 3,840 x 2,400 像素的 OLED 触摸屏,这也是我们测试设备上安装的面板。尽管 XPS 16 的主观画质不错,但与三星最新一代的 OLED 屏幕(例如安装在Galaxy Book4 Ultra 上的 OLED 屏幕)相比,XPS 16 的面板显示出一些缺点,尽管其分辨率更高。首先,它的刷新率只有 90 Hz,而不是 120 Hz,当显示明亮的内容时,仔细观察会发现光栅效应。在最大 SDR 亮度方面,戴尔 XPS 16 也略逊一筹,平均亮度约为 367 cd/m²。其黑色值为 0,因此对比度极高。我们注意到,在 HDR 模式下(必须手动激活),最大亮度可达 580 cd/m²。在 0-90% 的所有亮度范围内,我们都能检测到频率为 360 Hz 的 PWM。

369
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
372
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
372
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
SDC4196 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 372 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 367.2 cd/m² Minimum: 21.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 366 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
Dell XPS 16 9640
SDC4196, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.3"
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
TL160MDMP01, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
LEN160-3.2K, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16"
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Samsung 156XG01, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.6"
Display
0%
1%
4%
2%
-17%
5%
Display P3 Coverage
98.3
98.6
0%
98.8
1%
99.9
2%
97
-1%
68.8
-30%
99.8
2%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.9
0%
100
0%
100
0%
99.8
0%
98.8
-1%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
87.8
88.5
1%
89.1
1%
96.9
10%
95.1
8%
70
-20%
98.4
12%
Response Times
7%
-614%
104%
-359%
-1212%
-89%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.82 ?(0.43, 0.39)
0.54 ?(0.29, 0.25)
34%
6.3 ?(2.5, 3.8)
-668%
0.22 ?(0.11, 0.11)
73%
14 ?(7.5, 6.5)
-1607%
13.7 ?(6.7, 7)
-1571%
1.68 ?(0.8, 0.88)
-105%
Response Time Black / White *
0.85 ?(0.46, 0.39)
0.69 ?(0.39, 0.3)
19%
5.6 ?(1.6, 4)
-559%
0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12)
71%
9.2 ?(2.2, 7)
-982%
8.1 ?(3.8, 4.3)
-853%
1.94 ?(0.97, 0.97)
-128%
PWM Frequency
360 ?(90)
240 ?(100)
-33%
960 ?(60)
167%
5800 ?(100)
1511%
239
-34%
Screen
6%
5%
4%
22%
-58%
-64%
Brightness middle
366
390
7%
551
51%
416
14%
539
47%
384
5%
389.5
6%
Brightness
367
393
7%
524
43%
418
14%
546
49%
371
1%
392
7%
Brightness Distribution
96
98
2%
91
-5%
96
0%
96
0%
88
-8%
98
2%
Black Level *
0.52
0.18
0.3
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
1.4
-8%
1.7
-31%
1.6
-23%
1.4
-8%
3.4
-162%
4.95
-281%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.6
2.7
25%
4.1
-14%
2.1
42%
2.1
42%
9.2
-156%
8.65
-140%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1
1
-0%
1.3
-30%
1.53
-53%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
2.1
5%
2.4
-9%
2.7
-23%
2.2
-0%
3.4
-55%
2
9%
Gamma
2.14 103%
2.27 97%
2.2 100%
2.16 102%
2.19 100%
2.16 102%
2.27 97%
CCT
6680 97%
6431 101%
6842 95%
6331 103%
6479 100%
7462 87%
6265 104%
Contrast
1060
2994
1280
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / 5%
-203% / -99%
37% / 29%
-112% / -78%
-429% / -240%
-49% / -54%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN 灰度(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 灰度(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 饱和度(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 饱和度(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:Vivid,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 灰度(配置文件:Internet,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
CalMAN 灰度(配置文件:Internet,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
CalMAN 饱和度(配置文件:Internet,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
CalMAN 饱和度(配置文件:Internet,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:Internet,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:Internet,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)对面板进行了分析。戴尔提供了不同的色彩配置文件,而预选配置文件Vivid已经提供了非常准确的色彩,只有灰色调仍有一些轻微偏差。使用我们自己的校准软件(您可以在上面免费下载相应的配置文件),我们可以进一步改善色彩描绘。如果你喜欢编辑照片,那么你会喜欢精确的配置文件Internet,它将色彩空间限制为 sRGB。

CalMAN 灰度校准(目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 灰度校准(目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 饱和度校准(目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 饱和度校准(目标色彩空间:P3)
已校准 CalMAN ColorChecker(目标色彩空间:P3)
已校准 CalMAN ColorChecker(目标色彩空间:P3)
对比 sRGB
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对 P3
对比 AdobeRGB
对比 AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.85 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.46 ms rise
↘ 0.39 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.82 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.43 ms rise
↘ 0.39 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 360 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

PWM 闪烁(亮度为 0)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 0)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 20)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 20)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 40)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 40)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 60)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 60)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 80)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 80)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 100)
PWM 闪烁(亮度为 100)


在阳光下
在阳光下
室外(晴天)
室外(晴天)

触摸屏非常容易反光,在室内也可能会出现反光问题。在室外,您也必须尽量避免光源或明亮表面的反射。在阴天使用笔记本电脑是可行的,但在阳光充足的大晴天可能会出现问题。它的视角稳定性通常很好,但如果屏幕中心偏离较大,就会出现典型的 OLED 蓝色光泽。

视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - 配备高级 Optimus 和最高 64 GB 内存的 XPS 16

与较小的 XPS 14新款 XPS 16 可以不配置专用显卡,但必须与 16GB 内存(LPDDR5x-6400)配合使用。32 GB 内存只能与专用图形处理器一起使用,而速度更快的 LPDDR5x-7467 内存只能与 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑.如果您想要 64GB 内存,还必须选择 酷睿至尊 9 185H和至少 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑.XPS 16 配备了 MUX 交换机和高级 Optimus 图形交换机。

 
 
 

测试条件

戴尔允许用户选择各种能耗配置文件,这些配置文件还可以与 Windows 性能设置相结合。默认配置文件为 "优化",但只有使用 "超性能"模式才能充分发挥显卡的性能。由于使用这两种配置文件时风扇噪音排放非常相似,因此我们选择超性能模式进行基准测试和测量。

能源概况 CPU 负载 CB R23 Multi GPU 负载 Time Spy 图形 赛博朋克 2077
QHD Ultra
最大风扇噪音排放
安静型 80 -> 75 瓦 18,296 点 50 瓦 8,186 点 30.8fps 43.3 dB(A)
优化型 80 -> 75 瓦 18,248 分 50 瓦 8,532 分 37.4fps 48.1 dB(A)
超高性能 100 -> 85 瓦 18,518 点 60 瓦 9,638 点 39.6fps 49.7 dB(A)

在测试过程中,我们遇到了图形切换过程中的一个错误,因为在全屏模式下,V-Sync 始终处于激活状态。而在窗口模式下,以及在图形驱动程序中手动选择 Nvidia GPU 时,就不会出现这个问题。在连接外接显示器时,正常的 Optimus 切换处于激活状态(因为所有 Thunderbolt 端口都通过英特尔 GPU 运行),问题也可以在这里找到。

处理器 - Core Ultra 7 155H

酷睿至尊 7 155H 酷睿至尊 7 155H是英特尔当前新一代流星湖处理器的一部分,取代了旧的 酷睿 i7-13700H.它拥有 16 个内核(22 个线程),最高内核时钟频率可达 4.8 GHz。此外,由于其功耗限制较高(100/85 瓦),其整体多核性能也非常出色。不过,与老款 Raptor Lake 芯片相比,其性能几乎没有优势,单个设备之间的差异是由不同的功耗限制造成的。另一方面,在单核性能方面,新的 Meteor Lake 芯片与旧的 Raptor Lake 型号(如 13700H)相比略有劣势。在电池使用情况下,处理器允许消耗 75/45 瓦特(其中 75 瓦特可以保持相当长的时间),其多核性能仅下降约 4%。反过来,在长时间负载的情况下,差异会更大。更多 CPU 基准测试请参见 我们的技术部分。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
Dell XPS 16 9640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2707 (2643.06-2817.5)
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2195 (2134.59-2575.83)
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2672 (2597.07-2848.6)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2533 (2383.65-2679.17)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H: Ø2816 (2725.35-2987.08)
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2126 (2076.41-2253.14)
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2169 (2072.22-2636.96)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
82.9 pt
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
78.4 pt
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
78.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
75.3 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 -2!
Intel Core i7-13700H
72.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
72.6 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
70.7 pt
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) -2!
Intel Core i7-13700H
70.6 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
68.9 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
19675 Points +7%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19007 Points +3%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
18433 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17267 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
15698 Points -15%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
15474 (14020.7min - 15473.8max) Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6936 - 30789, n=99, last 2 years)
15450 Points -16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9769 - 19007, n=47)
14916 Points -19%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
14760 Points -20%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
1885 Points +5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
1879 Points +5%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
1836 Points +3%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1791 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1789 Points 0%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1757 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2290, n=90, last 2 years)
1757 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1496 - 1815, n=47)
1726 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1681 Points -6%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
7529 Points +5%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7409 Points +4%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7146 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6682 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6085 Points -15%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
5986 Points -16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3798 - 7409, n=45)
5791 Points -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2681 - 11768, n=85, last 2 years)
5708 Points -20%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
5672 Points -21%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
732 Points +9%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
729 Points +8%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
696 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
693 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
693 Points +3%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
689 Points +3%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
672 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (601 - 696, n=45)
665 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 853, n=85, last 2 years)
652 Points -3%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
2987 (2725.35min - 2987.08max) Points +6%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2848.6 (2597.07min - 2848.6max) Points +1%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2818 (2643.06min - 2817.5max) Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2679 (2383.65min - 2679.17max) Points -5%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
2637 (2072.22min - 2636.96max) Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2576 (2134.59min - 2575.83max) Points -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1932 - 2880, n=51)
2445 Points -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1252 - 4774, n=89, last 2 years)
2445 Points -13%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
2253 (2076.41min - 2253.14max) Points -20%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
276 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
274 Points +5%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
270 Points +4%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
268 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
264 Points +2%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
260 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
259 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.6 - 323, n=85, last 2 years)
257 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (99.6 - 268, n=47)
249 Points -4%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 502, n=83, last 2 years)
252 Seconds * -41%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (175 - 381, n=43)
234 Seconds * -31%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
223 Seconds * -25%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
220 Seconds * -23%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
217 Seconds * -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
193 Seconds * -8%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
190 Seconds * -6%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
179 Seconds *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
172 Seconds * +4%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
78446 MIPS +12%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
70074 MIPS
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
69955 MIPS 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68500 MIPS -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
62513 MIPS -11%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
61921 MIPS -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30592 - 121228, n=78, last 2 years)
60549 MIPS -14%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
59413 MIPS -15%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (41739 - 70254, n=45)
58973 MIPS -16%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
6224 MIPS +14%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
6124 MIPS +12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
5924 MIPS +8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7545, n=78, last 2 years)
5726 MIPS +5%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5540 MIPS +1%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5539 MIPS +1%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5474 MIPS
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5439 MIPS -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (4795 - 5621, n=45)
5343 MIPS -2%
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
14502 Points +6%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13656 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (7592 - 22544, n=61, last 2 years)
13504 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13323 Points -2%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13122 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12517 Points -8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (7732 - 13656, n=50)
12279 Points -10%
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (1534 - 3927, n=57, last 2 years)
2659 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
2588 Points +7%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2458 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2436 Points +1%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2418 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2410 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1901 - 2473, n=47)
2378 Points -2%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
14521 Points +7%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13556 Points
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
13241 Points -2%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13173 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12905 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12463 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4990 - 23059, n=85, last 2 years)
12023 Points -11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (10017 - 13556, n=47)
12016 Points -11%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
11808 Points -13%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
1900 Points +7%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
1885 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1824 Points +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (891 - 2342, n=85, last 2 years)
1821 Points +3%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1809 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
1791 Points +1%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1775 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1755 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1462 - 1824, n=47)
1753 Points -1%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
21.3 fps +2%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
20.8 fps
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
20.7 fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.9 fps -4%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
17.6 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17.1 fps -18%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
16.6 fps -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.26 - 30.5, n=77, last 2 years)
16.5 fps -21%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (9.93 - 21.2, n=45)
16.4 fps -21%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
49.6 s * -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 146.7, n=79, last 2 years)
49.3 s * -10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (40.9 - 79.2, n=44)
49 s * -9%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
47.7 s * -6%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
47.6 s * -6%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
46.6 s * -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
46.6 s * -4%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
44.8 s *
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
43.5 s * +3%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3604 - 0.947, n=78, last 2 years)
0.4837 sec * -0%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4828 sec *
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (0.4457 - 0.53, n=44)
0.4819 sec * -0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4682 sec * +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4654 sec * +4%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4609 sec * +5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
0.4571 sec * +5%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.4384 sec * +9%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.434 sec * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
260 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2818 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
166.7 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7146 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
672 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1791 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
18433 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1001 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
104 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
95.6 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
94.6 pt
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.3 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.7 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
78.1 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
77.1 pt
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75.8 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
75.2 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
17568 KRay/s +3%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
17156 KRay/s +1%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
17015 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
16431 KRay/s -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4906 - 36957, n=75, last 2 years)
14517 KRay/s -15%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13869 KRay/s -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
13541 KRay/s -20%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13486 KRay/s -21%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (6670 - 18470, n=45)
13101 KRay/s -23%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
93181 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
92250 Points +5%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88083 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85461 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14528 - 147248, n=76, last 2 years)
73152 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
71791 Points -18%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70104 Points -20%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (40905 - 93181, n=45)
69488 Points -21%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69120 Points -22%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
4436 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
4189 MB/s +1%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4134 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3814 MB/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1529 - 6698, n=76, last 2 years)
3407 MB/s -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
3251 MB/s -21%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1940 - 4436, n=45)
3244 MB/s -22%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3200 MB/s -23%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3146 MB/s -24%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
106736 Points +19%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
103652 Points +15%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
99961 Points +11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 141074, n=76, last 2 years)
91281 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90347 Points +1%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89747 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
84280 Points -6%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
84062 Points -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (64698 - 94181, n=45)
83491 Points -7%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
11077 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10641 Points 0%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
10625 Points 0%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10607 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
9696 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1240 - 19021, n=76, last 2 years)
9385 Points -12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (5639 - 10647, n=45)
9119 Points -14%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8982 Points -15%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8714 Points -18%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
43496 Points
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
43427 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
42686 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41806 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9903 - 75780, n=75, last 2 years)
36390 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
34862 Points -20%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
33848 Points -22%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (18236 - 47685, n=45)
33738 Points -22%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
33488 Points -23%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
152179 MB/s +80%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
85118 MB/s +1%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84332 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
79475 MB/s -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (45713 - 152179, n=45)
78240 MB/s -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (31432 - 169946, n=76, last 2 years)
76459 MB/s -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
68288 MB/s -19%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66616 MB/s -21%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
62599 MB/s -26%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1250 MB/s +3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1226 MB/s +1%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1208 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1128 MB/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
968 MB/s -20%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (557 - 1250, n=45)
960 MB/s -21%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
948 MB/s -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (454 - 1973, n=76, last 2 years)
939 MB/s -22%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
918 MB/s -24%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
9166 KRay/s +3%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8899 KRay/s
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
8776 KRay/s -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8449 KRay/s -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2738 - 20608, n=76, last 2 years)
7884 KRay/s -11%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
7475 KRay/s -16%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
7240 KRay/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
7087 KRay/s -20%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3569 - 9802, n=45)
6848 KRay/s -23%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
52257 MPixel/s 0%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
52123 MPixel/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
50926 MPixel/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49238 MPixel/s -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (32719 - 54223, n=45)
46541 MPixel/s -11%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
46208 MPixel/s -11%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44545 MPixel/s -15%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44101 MPixel/s -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 53918, n=76, last 2 years)
40705 MPixel/s -22%

系统性能

在日常使用中,新款 XPS 16 9640 的响应速度非常快,我们在合成基准测试中也没有发现异常。我们在测试过程中没有遇到任何问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7084 - 7761, n=4)
7418 Points +5%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7368 Points +4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7301 Points +3%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
7253 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7123 Points +1%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
7084 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6973 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4542 - 8670, n=71, last 2 years)
6807 Points -4%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
6800 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
11449 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10994 Points +6%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10753 Points +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=71, last 2 years)
10532 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10446 Points +1%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10393 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10038 - 10393, n=4)
10259 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10038 Points -3%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
9476 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9511 Points +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9192 - 9518, n=4)
9335 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9208 Points 0%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
9192 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9152 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6089 - 10742, n=71, last 2 years)
8941 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8858 Points -4%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
8501 Points -8%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
8461 Points -8%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10100 - 13035, n=4)
11610 Points +15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10849 Points +7%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10691 Points +6%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
10643 Points +5%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
10637 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10612 Points +5%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10100 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9624 Points -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3651 - 13548, n=71, last 2 years)
9232 Points -9%
CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1896 Points +3%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1888 Points +2%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1848 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1835 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1687 - 1848, n=4)
1755 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1740 Points -6%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1723 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1721 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years)
1703 Points -8%
CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1822 Points +4%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1754 Points 0%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1750 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1698 Points -3%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1677 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1589 - 1750, n=4)
1662 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1659 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1624 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years)
1616 Points -8%
CrossMark / Creativity
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2137 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2104 Points +4%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2014 Points
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2012 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1942 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1860 - 2014, n=4)
1932 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1930 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years)
1909 Points -5%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1811 Points -10%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1789 Points +6%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1683 Points
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1627 Points -3%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1608 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1424 - 1683, n=4)
1548 Points -8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1535 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1467 Points -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years)
1435 Points -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1424 Points -15%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
321 Points +13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (136.4 - 545, n=83, last 2 years)
313 Points +11%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
301 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
299 Points +6%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
287 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
283 Points 0%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
283 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
281 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (264 - 294, n=4)
281 Points -1%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
277 Points +9%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
274 Points +8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
264 Points +4%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
262 Points +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (133.2 - 353, n=76, last 2 years)
259 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
258 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
256 Points +1%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
254 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (247 - 257, n=4)
254 Points 0%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (546 - 568, n=3)
554 ms *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
548 ms *
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
522 ms *
Average of class Multimedia
  (254 - 1016, n=87, last 2 years)
510 ms *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
505 ms *
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
496 ms *
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
494 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
416.4 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7084 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
92745 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
90918 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89414 MB/s -4%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
84014 MB/s -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (62397 - 96791, n=45)
83293 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
78047 MB/s -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20549 - 104459, n=76, last 2 years)
69001 MB/s -26%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66025 MB/s -29%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
65071 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
89474 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86576 MB/s +3%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83887 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (60544 - 90647, n=45)
79984 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
77976 MB/s -7%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
76398 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70707 MB/s -16%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70378 MB/s -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 125604, n=76, last 2 years)
69991 MB/s -17%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
95196 MB/s +30%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
75899 MB/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
75813 MB/s +3%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73377 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73337 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (58692 - 93451, n=45)
72558 MB/s -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 117933, n=76, last 2 years)
70079 MB/s -4%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67424 MB/s -8%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67041 MB/s -9%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (120.2 - 233, n=45)
144.2 ns * -6%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
141.6 ns * -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
141.4 ns * -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
140 ns * -2%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
136.6 ns *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
115 ns * +16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 346, n=76, last 2 years)
106.9 ns * +22%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.9 ns * +36%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.2 ns * +38%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试(网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备仅在使用实时音频应用程序时表现出轻微的限制。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4358.5 μs * -382%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2484.4 μs * -175%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1657 μs * -83%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1083.5 μs * -20%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
903.7 μs *
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
893 μs * +1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
596.3 μs * +34%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的测试设备中安装了 1TB 版本的 Kioxia XG8,用户首次启动笔记本电脑后可使用 834 GB。PCIe-4.0 固态硬盘的性能非常好,最重要的是非常稳定。没有额外的固态硬盘插槽。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.

Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7041 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5405 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 549 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 381 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 72.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 215 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1480 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2002 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
94.8 pt
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
85 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
75.9 pt
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
71.6 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
67.9 pt
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
 
66.4 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
65.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
55.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
47.2 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
4156 (4146.28min - 4156.42max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3770 (3740.06min - 3770.26max) MB/s -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3712 (3688.85min - 3711.75max) MB/s -11%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (2735 - 4156, n=9)
3471 MB/s -16%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
3459 (3401.28min - 3459.04max) MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3202 (3129.61min - 3201.93max) MB/s -23%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3077 (2170.13min - 3076.66max) MB/s -26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1629 - 4861, n=75, last 2 years)
2970 MB/s -29%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2511 (2497.5min - 2511.13max) MB/s -40%
seq write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5155 (4427.3min - 5155.43max) MB/s +7%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
4833 (4624.01min - 4832.66max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4152 (3343.49min - 4151.61max) MB/s -14%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (3038 - 4893, n=9)
3943 MB/s -18%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
3923 (3558.45min - 3922.64max) MB/s -19%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3845 (3754.57min - 3844.71max) MB/s -20%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3340 (3237.37min - 3340.31max) MB/s -31%
Average of class Multimedia
  (463 - 5711, n=75, last 2 years)
3079 MB/s -36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2526 (2498.97min - 2525.81max) MB/s -48%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7121 (6367.95min - 7120.69max) MB/s +2%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
6985 (6183.66min - 6984.69max) MB/s
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (6169 - 6985, n=9)
6644 MB/s -5%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6570 (5809.83min - 6569.96max) MB/s -6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6555 (5758.8min - 6554.54max) MB/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5759 (4945.05min - 5758.78max) MB/s -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2132 - 7126, n=75, last 2 years)
5490 MB/s -21%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
5145 (4433.23min - 5144.94max) MB/s -26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5008 (4421.01min - 5007.74max) MB/s -28%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6761 (6735.84min - 6761.33max) MB/s +25%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
6104 (6052.8min - 6104.18max) MB/s +12%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5426 (5242.67min - 5425.96max) MB/s
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (5144 - 5667, n=9)
5420 MB/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5032 (4977.28min - 5031.91max) MB/s -7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4937 (4926.84min - 4936.71max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (555 - 6898, n=75, last 2 years)
4167 MB/s -23%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
4055 (3954.18min - 4054.84max) MB/s -25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3230 (3169.22min - 3230.03max) MB/s -40%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
85.3 (84.45min - 85.25max) MB/s +27%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
83.7 (81.88min - 83.66max) MB/s +24%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
78.6 (77.75min - 78.62max) MB/s +17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
78.3 (76.54min - 78.34max) MB/s +16%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
73.6 (72.25min - 73.56max) MB/s +9%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
67.3 (66.55min - 67.32max) MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 97.7, n=75, last 2 years)
62.7 MB/s -7%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (51.3 - 69.6, n=9)
59.2 MB/s -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
52.9 (51.15min - 52.91max) MB/s -21%
4k q1 t1 write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
267 (266.37min - 267.43max) MB/s +25%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
254 (251.14min - 254.13max) MB/s +19%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
214 (212.24min - 213.72max) MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
175.2 (173.12min - 175.17max) MB/s -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (69.4 - 378, n=75, last 2 years)
169.5 MB/s -21%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (116.4 - 219, n=9)
164.7 MB/s -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
164.2 (156.89min - 164.15max) MB/s -23%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
141 (138.88min - 140.96max) MB/s -34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
128.4 (126.56min - 128.36max) MB/s -40%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4358 (4325.31min - 4358.41max) MB/s +14%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3811 (3808.17min - 3810.83max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2181 (2156.61min - 2181.46max) MB/s -43%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (561 - 3829, n=9)
2173 MB/s -43%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1985 (1758.24min - 1985.03max) MB/s -48%
Average of class Multimedia
  (295 - 4881, n=75, last 2 years)
1337 MB/s -65%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
996 (952.75min - 996.41max) MB/s -74%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
681 (654.71min - 680.72max) MB/s -82%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
604 (565.74min - 603.6max) MB/s -84%
4k q32 t16 write
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3101 (2756.05min - 3100.73max) MB/s +16%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3090 (3060.74min - 3090.41max) MB/s +15%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2682 (2675.9min - 2682.13max) MB/s
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
2328 (2118.19min - 2328.38max) MB/s -13%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (365 - 2682, n=9)
1414 MB/s -47%
Average of class Multimedia
  (192.1 - 4074, n=75, last 2 years)
1005 MB/s -63%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
510 (500.59min - 509.88max) MB/s -81%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
457 (451.8min - 456.79max) MB/s -83%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
402 (389.17min - 402.07max) MB/s -85%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9172 Points +12%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
8212 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7043 Points -14%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (4465 - 8212, n=9)
6264 Points -24%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5903 Points -28%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5792 Points -29%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
5273 Points -36%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2033 - 9972, n=72, last 2 years)
5039 Points -39%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3272 Points -60%
Score Read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3369 Points +2%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3310 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2413 Points -27%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (1359 - 3403, n=9)
2277 Points -31%
Average of class Multimedia
  (669 - 3501, n=72, last 2 years)
1617 Points -51%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1496 Points -55%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
1494 Points -55%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1433 Points -57%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1020 Points -69%
Score Write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4082 Points +26%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3834 Points +18%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3631 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3462 Points +7%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3244 Points
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
3001 Points -7%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (2518 - 3244, n=9)
2908 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (656 - 4813, n=72, last 2 years)
2658 Points -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1808 Points -44%
Seq Read
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5730 MB/s
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (5197 - 5837, n=9)
5560 MB/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5351 MB/s -7%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5128 MB/s -11%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
5103.97 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5048 MB/s -12%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
4414 MB/s -23%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1718 - 5730, n=72, last 2 years)
4247 MB/s -26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3662 MB/s -36%
Seq Write
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5175 MB/s
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5101 MB/s -1%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
4365 MB/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3925 MB/s -24%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (2824 - 5175, n=9)
3759 MB/s -27%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
2808.19 MB/s -46%
Average of class Multimedia
  (414 - 5651, n=72, last 2 years)
2728 MB/s -47%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2623 MB/s -49%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1921 MB/s -63%
4K Read
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
76 MB/s +20%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
75.8 MB/s +20%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
68.88 MB/s +9%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
67 MB/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
65.3 MB/s +3%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
63.3 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (28.7 - 98.5, n=72, last 2 years)
61.6 MB/s -3%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (49.8 - 65.6, n=9)
59.3 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
42.2 MB/s -33%
4K Write
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
247.17 MB/s +29%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
233 MB/s +21%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
231 MB/s +20%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
193 MB/s +1%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
191.9 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (66.5 - 328, n=72, last 2 years)
189.7 MB/s -1%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (147.9 - 224, n=9)
189 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
157.9 MB/s -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
153.2 MB/s -20%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2780 MB/s +4%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2673 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1813 MB/s -32%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (773 - 2766, n=9)
1661 MB/s -38%
Average of class Multimedia
  (350 - 2989, n=72, last 2 years)
1131 MB/s -58%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
985 MB/s -63%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
915 MB/s -66%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
853.63 MB/s -68%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
612 MB/s -77%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3341 MB/s +32%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
3305.51 MB/s +30%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3176 MB/s +25%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2916 MB/s +15%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2535 MB/s
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (2083 - 2535, n=9)
2344 MB/s -8%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
2332 MB/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (411 - 4265, n=72, last 2 years)
2196 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1458 MB/s -42%
Access Time Read
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (0.037 - 0.126, n=9)
0.07367 ms * -75%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.018 - 0.15, n=72, last 2 years)
0.05465 ms * -30%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.042 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.033 ms * +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.032 ms * +24%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.03 ms * +29%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
0.026 ms * +38%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.021 ms * +50%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.018 ms * +57%
Access Time Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.013 - 0.414, n=72, last 2 years)
0.06164 ms * -194%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
0.053 ms * -152%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (0.018 - 0.071, n=9)
0.03678 ms * -75%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.027 ms * -29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.023 ms * -10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.021 ms * -0%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.021 ms *
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.017 ms * +19%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
0.017 ms * +19%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035070010501400175021002450280031503500385042004550490052505600595063006650Tooltip
Dell XPS 16 9640; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6924 (6101.03-6957.02)

图形卡

GPU-Z NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑
GPU-Z NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑

我们的测试设备配备了 GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑配备 8GB VRAM,其 TGP 为 50-60 瓦,具体取决于所选的能耗配置文件。XPS 16 配备了一个 MUX 开关,并通过高级 Optimus 支持图形切换--简单的图形计算由集成的 英特尔弧形图形.

因此,它的性能比旧款 XPS 15它采用了 50 瓦版的 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑,但这一细分市场中的竞争对手提供的机型速度更快,因此 GPU 性能也更强。去年的 Yoga Pro 9 16配备了 100 瓦版 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑例如,它的速度并不慢。在这方面,本来可以做得更多。

它的图形性能在连续负载下保持稳定,但允许 GPU 在电池模式下最大消耗 50 瓦,导致性能降低略低于 10%。更多 GPU 基准测试见 这里.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
99.3 pt
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
98.6 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
94 pt
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
86.2 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
84.5 pt
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
79.9 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
62.6 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
55.3 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
48.8 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
40870 Points +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=59)
40410 Points +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
37313 Points +12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
35299 Points +6%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
33251 Points
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32054 Points -4%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
24229 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
22216 Points -33%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=76, last 2 years)
20172 Points -39%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
29801 Points +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12242 - 33451, n=62)
29041 Points +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
26568 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
25562 Points +5%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
24235 Points
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
24153 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16735 Points -31%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
16212 Points -33%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=79, last 2 years)
14506 Points -40%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5012 - 13391, n=60)
11603 Points +20%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
11496 Points +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10989 Points +14%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
9913 Points +3%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
9638 Points
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
9026 Points -6%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
6241 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6073 Points -37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=80, last 2 years)
5472 Points -43%
Geekbench 6.3 - GPU OpenCL
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (85488 - 129836, n=37)
113812 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
107953 Points +2%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
105731 Points
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
89578 Points -15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
87488 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60815 Points -42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9994 - 112310, n=56, last 2 years)
52285 Points -51%
Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
113949 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (17391 - 129366, n=61)
113893 Points +8%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
108736 Points +3%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
105102 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
100573 Points -4%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
95039 Points -10%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
94390 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68509 Points -35%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10769 - 122560, n=84, last 2 years)
60314 Points -43%
3DMark 11 Performance
29315 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
21848 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
9774 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Multimedia
  (19 - 99, n=44, last 2 years)
41.3 Seconds * -97%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32 Seconds * -52%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
28 Seconds * -33%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
25 Seconds * -19%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
23 Seconds * -10%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
23 Seconds * -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
22 Seconds * -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 30, n=60)
21.5 Seconds * -2%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
21 Seconds *
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Multimedia
  (32 - 181, n=45, last 2 years)
72.6 Seconds * -102%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
56 Seconds * -56%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
46 Seconds * -28%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
44 Seconds * -22%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
41 Seconds * -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 181, n=63)
40.6 Seconds * -13%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
36 Seconds *
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
35 Seconds * +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
34 Seconds * +6%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (189 - 946, n=83, last 2 years)
427 Seconds * -40%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
393 Seconds * -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
380 Seconds * -24%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
377 Seconds * -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
330 Seconds * -8%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
317 Seconds * -4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
307 Seconds * -0%
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
306 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 440, n=59)
290 Seconds * +5%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

在 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的支持下,XPS 16 9640 的游戏性能并不逊色--我们测试的所有游戏都可以在 QHD 分辨率下流畅运行,并获得最大细节。不过,对于 3840 x 2400 像素的原生分辨率屏幕来说,要么降低细节,要么使用 Nvidia 的 DLSS 等升频技术。与竞争对手相比,XPS 再次逊色于配备 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的机型和 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑的快速版本(例如:MagicBook Pro)。Honor MagicBook Pro, 联想 Yoga Pro 9 16).即使在长时间的游戏过程中,它的游戏性能也能保持稳定。

Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
98.3 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
92.7 pt
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
85.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.9 pt
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.3 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70.6 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
64.4 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
53.4 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105.4 (100min, 100P1) fps +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
98.6 (94min, 94P1) fps +12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
90.8 (87min, 88P1) fps +3%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.8 (77min, 83P1) fps
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
81.5 (78min, 78P1) fps -7%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69.8 (64min) fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
54.5 (51min, 52P1) fps -38%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)
54 fps -38%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
107.4 (4.68min, 66.7P1) fps +4%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
103.6 (5.17min, 71.4P1) fps
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
100.4 (2.7min, 58.8P1) fps -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
98.8 (3.78min, 58.8P1) fps -5%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
96.5 (4.91min, 66.7P1) fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
67.6 (4.78min, 43.5P1) fps -35%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63.5 (4.22min, 37P1) fps -39%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.09 - 126.3, n=79, last 2 years)
53.6 fps -48%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
109 fps +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
100.8 fps +8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
95.7 fps +3%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
93.1 fps
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
84.3 fps -9%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
56.7 fps -39%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.53 - 141.8, n=80, last 2 years)
51.1 fps -45%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
196.7 (34.8min, 146.3P1) fps +12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
184.1 (24min, 133P1) fps +5%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
175 fps
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
165 fps -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
129.3 (30.4min, 84.7P1) fps -26%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117.7 (64.5min, 88.7P1) fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
113 fps -35%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 233, n=79, last 2 years)
87.8 fps -50%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
143.8 (126.1min) fps +60%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
142.3 (118.3min) fps +59%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
139.5 (120.8min) fps +56%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137 (116.5min) fps +53%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
131.6 (114.5min) fps +47%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
126.8 (108.1min) fps +41%
Average of class Multimedia
  (26.3 - 179.9, n=81, last 2 years)
96.3 fps +7%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89.7 (83.8min) fps
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
109.7 fps +30%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
98.3 fps +16%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
91.4 fps +8%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.6 fps +7%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.7 fps
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.4 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
81.5 fps -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81.2 fps -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 141.1, n=81, last 2 years)
66.8 fps -21%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.8 - 133.7, n=55)
112.2 fps +28%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105.4 (100min, 100P1) fps +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
98.6 (94min, 94P1) fps +12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
90.8 (87min, 88P1) fps +3%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.8 (77min, 83P1) fps
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
81.5 (78min, 78P1) fps -7%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69.8 (64min) fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
54.5 (51min, 52P1) fps -38%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)
54 fps -38%
2560x1440 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (47 - 93.1, n=14)
83.9 fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.4 fps +13%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73 fps
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
68 fps -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (37 - 89, n=12, last 2 years)
61 fps -16%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
46 fps -37%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (30.7 - 90.7, n=29)
79.6 fps +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69 fps +7%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64.3 (53.3min) fps
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
60.1 (49.6min) fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
39.4 (32.4min) fps -39%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8.26 - 80.7, n=49, last 2 years)
34.6 fps -46%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24.8 - 57.1, n=28)
49.1 fps +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
43.7 fps +10%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
39.6 (32.7min) fps
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
36.7 (31.1min) fps -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.21 - 49.4, n=17, last 2 years)
32.4 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
23.3 (19.7min) fps -41%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (92 - 158, n=34)
127.2 fps +11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
127 fps +10%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
120 fps +4%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
112 fps -3%
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
112 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
80 fps -30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (17 - 145, n=58, last 2 years)
68.6 fps -40%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (79 - 128, n=31)
108.8 fps +16%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
108 fps +15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
97 fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94 fps 0%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94 fps
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
80 fps -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (26 - 117, n=31, last 2 years)
71.2 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
58 fps -38%
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (66.7 - 128.5, n=20)
103 fps +12%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.8 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.1 - 117.7, n=37, last 2 years)
43.9 fps -52%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (54.4 - 89.6, n=18)
73.9 fps +16%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63.8 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.4 - 79.8, n=12, last 2 years)
49.2 fps -23%
Horizon Forbidden West
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (53.2 - 76.7, n=9)
65.3 fps +23%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
53.2 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (12.4 - 65.4, n=5, last 2 years)
50 fps -6%
2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (40.3 - 59.1, n=8)
52 fps +29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (40.3 - 56.1, n=3, last 2 years)
48.8 fps +21%
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
40.3 fps

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Dell XPS 16 9640 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø87.8 (77-95)
CPU/GPU 数据Witcher 3 循环(超强设置,1080p)
CPU/GPU 数据Witcher 3 循环(超强设置,1080p)
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 177 170.7 103.6 81.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 399 327 195 87.8 73
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 89.8 89.6 89.5 89.7 115.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 150.2 123.2 93.1 70
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 125.1 108.5 84.7 68.9
Far Cry 5 (2018) 140 126 122 115 94
Strange Brigade (2018) 423 258 202 175 116
F1 23 (2023) 214 189.7 175.1 55.5 35.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 135.7 107.1 93.5 91.8 63.8
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 112 87.6 74.7 64.3 39.6
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) 96.6 83.7 58.5 53.2 40.3

排放 - 戴尔在 XPS 16 中安装了蒸气室

噪音排放

相比之下 较小的 XPS 14的传统散热器相比,戴尔在较大的 XPS 16 中安装了带两个风扇的 Vapor Chamber 冷却装置。特别是在低负载情况下,风扇经常保持关闭或非常安静的状态,但在高负载情况下,风扇的声音还是会很快变大。我们对优化配置文件(最大 48.1 dB(A))和超高性能配置文件(最大 49.7 dB(A))之间的微小差异感到特别惊讶,两者都太吵了,以至于不需要耳机也能玩游戏。Quiet 配置文件的最大音量为 43.3 dB(A),实际上一点也不安静。不少竞争对手,如 MagicBook ProZephyrus G16等不少竞争对手都能以更低的噪音提供更好的性能。我们在测试样本中没有发现任何额外的电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle
24.5 / 24.5 / 27.5 dB(A)
Load
39.6 / 49.7 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.441.741.142.939.641.12532.534.332.533.332.533.7313433.530.628.229.230.94032.733.131.934.133.533.75031.132.829.930.832.532.76332.430.32931.92829.88031.625.724.125.62325.310030.72524.92223.324.412528.325.623.322.622.224.516027.225.224.123.523.524.920028.925.424.423.321.72525029.429.922.723.821.823.931531.525.819.319.917.42040033.827.518.319.714.118.450035.126.517.418.512.118.263034.425.41617.213.41980037.327.415.618.410.718.4100039.329.81618.910.218.4125039.429.415.718.510.115.916004030.21618.910.418.9200041.131.116.118.910.620.2250040.129.714.51710.819.7315038.927.613.41511.217400035.824.212.713.511.814.5500034.421.912.812.911.915.2630031.819.612.71312.114.6800029.320.312.712.912.113.91000025.215.712.712.912.214.11250022.714.312.812.912.314.51600016.912.91212.211.413SPL49.739.627.529.224.529.9N6.73.111.20.61.3median 33.8median 25.6median 16median 18.5median 12.1median 18.4Delta4.84.44.243.33.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseDell XPS 16 9640
Dell XPS 16 9640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
Noise
7%
8%
1%
-3%
-10%
13%
off / environment *
24.5
24.2
1%
24
2%
23.9
2%
24.7
-1%
25.9
-6%
23.1
6%
Idle Minimum *
24.5
24.2
1%
24
2%
23.9
2%
24.7
-1%
25.9
-6%
23.1
6%
Idle Average *
24.5
24.2
1%
24
2%
27.8
-13%
26.2
-7%
25.9
-6%
23.1
6%
Idle Maximum *
27.5
24.2
12%
27.2
1%
30.1
-9%
26.2
5%
32
-16%
24.2
12%
Load Average *
39.6
37.9
4%
29
27%
34.2
14%
39.7
-0%
47.2
-19%
27.1
32%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49.7
41.7
16%
42.1
15%
46.4
7%
53.2
-7%
53.1
-7%
40.1
19%
Load Maximum *
49.7
41.7
16%
45
9%
46.4
7%
53.2
-7%
53.1
-7%
44.6
10%

* ... smaller is better

温度

笔记本的表面温度表明,戴尔可以提高部件的性能或降低风扇的转速,因为即使在压力测试中,我们测得的温度也从未超过 40 °C。在执行简单任务和空转时,铝制外壳几乎没有升温。在使用 CPU/GPU 综合负载的压力测试中,显卡的功率稳定在 60 瓦,而处理器的功率仅为 20 瓦。

CPU/GPU 数据压力测试
CPU/GPU 数据压力测试
Max. Load
 38.4 °C39.4 °C39.2 °C 
 31.9 °C36.4 °C31.3 °C 
 30.1 °C30.1 °C29.5 °C 
Maximum: 39.4 °C
Average: 34 °C
36.6 °C36.9 °C36.8 °C
35.7 °C36.9 °C34.8 °C
30.8 °C32.5 °C31.4 °C
Maximum: 36.9 °C
Average: 34.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  51 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.4 °C / -2.6 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(底部)
表面温度应力测试(底部)
Dell XPS 16 9640
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat
5%
3%
-17%
-10%
-15%
-18%
Maximum Upper Side *
39.4
38.5
2%
39.7
-1%
50.3
-28%
41.6
-6%
46.7
-19%
45.6
-16%
Maximum Bottom *
36.9
41.2
-12%
42.9
-16%
48
-30%
50
-36%
54.1
-47%
42
-14%
Idle Upper Side *
28.2
23.5
17%
23.7
16%
28.8
-2%
26.8
5%
26.5
6%
34.4
-22%
Idle Bottom *
27.4
24.1
12%
23.5
14%
29.8
-9%
27.9
-2%
26.8
2%
33.2
-21%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

XPS 16 的音响系统由四个扬声器组成,总输出功率为 10 瓦。所产生的音效很好,几乎不会让你失望,但竞争对手如 ROG Zephyrus G16等竞争对手的产品可以做得更好。根据我们的分析,新款 XPS 16 还略逊于旧款 XPS 15.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.6452532.536.63129.2334033.534.85032.537.8632839.2802339.410023.347.312522.253.116023.554.420021.760.825021.864.531517.47040014.176.750012.175.963013.474.980010.774100010.274.3125010.172.5160010.472200010.670.3250010.868.7315011.270.2400011.869.3500011.969.7630012.167800012.166.71000012.266.31250012.367.91600011.462.5SPL24.583.4N0.662.1median 12.1median 69.3Delta3.34.536.143.62639.829.441.436.64732.638.426.743.323.85022.461.62166.118.963.618.269.322.972.717.27213.772.711.971.211.472.710.372.510.3719.674.19.575.4107410.469.410.769.611.266.511.566.411.765.511.768.411.865.111.76211.259.723.983.30.661.9median 11.7median 69.42.73.741.340.333.230.929.926.233.133.127.629.125.731.821.440.42052.318.559.616.660.119.265.122.267.115.96913.765.512.662.311.568.51171.71167.511.466.310.966.611.672.511.771.512.170.712.364.912.564.912.864.712.961.712.961.412.76412.360.924.780.50.650.9median 12.6median 65.12.43.536.741.336.726.325.726.326.426.226.425.525.425.528.320.528.334.621.834.648.92448.959.120.359.161.319.361.366.71666.766.614.666.668.113.368.171.513.471.572.712.672.773.112.273.171.89.571.873.59.373.576.89.576.8759.17569.19.769.166.210.266.269.910.469.971.810.871.867.711.467.768.411.968.469.111.869.167.811.867.867.411.867.467.611.967.664.811.264.883.423.183.463.20.463.2median 68.4median 11.8median 68.42.81.62.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell XPS 16 9640Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MLenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell XPS 16 9640 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 99.5 瓦时电池提供充足的电量

耗电量

在我们的功耗测量中,高分辨率 OLED 触摸屏的节俭程度令人吃惊,因为尽管标准背景图像很暗,但 10.6 瓦的最大功耗对于 16.3 英寸的屏幕来说并不算高。在负载情况下,我们没有发现任何意外。在压力测试中,它的功耗曾一度达到 138 瓦左右,但 1.5 分钟后稳定在 125 瓦,之后又降至 115 瓦。虽然回旋余地不大,但总体而言,130 瓦的紧凑型电源大小足够。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.42 / 0.85 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7.7 / 10.3 / 10.6 Watt
Load midlight 76.5 / 138.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell XPS 16 9640
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.3"
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16"
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.6"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
22%
-20%
-11%
-58%
-16%
-57%
-67%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
7.7
4.8
38%
5.2
32%
8.3
-8%
10.9
-42%
8.6
-12%
20
-160%
12.1 ?(4.3 - 31, n=50)
-57%
Idle Average *
10.3
7.5
27%
14.4
-40%
12.5
-21%
22.6
-119%
12
-17%
20.7
-101%
17.1 ?(4.6 - 34.1, n=50)
-66%
Idle Maximum *
10.6
7.9
25%
15.4
-45%
12.8
-21%
23.5
-122%
12.4
-17%
22.4
-111%
23.9 ?(9 - 55.4, n=50)
-125%
Load Average *
76.5
79.3
-4%
105.4
-38%
71.3
7%
84.6
-11%
80
-5%
77.1
-1%
97.9 ?(59.2 - 178, n=50)
-28%
Witcher 3 ultra *
126.4
79.2
37%
107.6
15%
127.5
-1%
159.5
-26%
147.7
-17%
95.4
25%
Load Maximum *
138.5
125
10%
195.2
-41%
169.1
-22%
177.3
-28%
173.1
-25%
133.4
4%
222 ?(107 - 319, n=50)
-60%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Dell XPS 16 9640; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø126.4 (123.3-133.4)
Dell XPS 16 9640; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø130 (117.2-138.5)
Dell XPS 16 9640; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.46 (8.33-11.2)

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Dell XPS 16 9640; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø114.8 (103.5-138.3)
Dell XPS 16 9640; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø121.3 (116.5-131)
Dell XPS 16 9640; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø30.8 (23.5-58.2)
Dell XPS 16 9640; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø115.9 (107.9-132.6)
Dell XPS 16 9640; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø76.1 (63-86.8)
Dell XPS 16 9640; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø117.1 (113.3-121.6)
Dell XPS 16 9640; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.7 (4.71-7.3)

运行时间

戴尔为新款 XPS 16 安装了最大容量的电池,其容量为 99.5 Wh,总的来说,其运行时间非常出色。在 150 cd/m²(相当于测试设备最大 SDR 亮度的 57%)的 WLAN 测试中,我们测得在 60 Hz 下的运行时间为 10:29 小时(90 Hz 下为 09:56 小时),在全亮度和 60 Hz 下的运行时间略高于 8 小时(90 Hz 下约为 07:20 小时)。在 150 cd/m² 下的视频测试中,我们注意到 16.5 小时的出色表现,这得益于 Meteor Lake 处理器的两个低功耗内核。在全亮度条件下播放 HDR 视频可长达 6.5 小时以上,而在全负载条件下,测试仅进行了不到 1.5 小时就结束了。

XPS 16 提供两种充电速度:在普通模式下,设备开机后电池充满电需要 151 分钟(93 分钟后达到 80%);在快速模式下,需要 97 分钟(50 分钟后达到 80%)。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
10h 29min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
8h 13min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 28min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 27min
Dell XPS 16 9640
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.5 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh
Honor MagicBook Pro 16 2024
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 75 Wh
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 75 Wh
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
1%
-12%
-27%
-48%
-30%
-11%
-2%
H.264
988
1076
9%
784
-21%
671
-32%
449
-55%
470
-52%
WiFi v1.3
629
656
4%
734
17%
435
-31%
385
-39%
467
-26%
481
-24%
Load
87
78
-10%
58
-33%
71
-18%
44
-49%
77
-11%
89
2%

Pros

+ 精确的 120 赫兹 OLED 触摸屏
+ 吸引人的设计
+ 良好的系统性能
+ 优质稳定的金属外壳
+ 快速读卡器
+ 最高可配备 64GB 内存
+ 先进的 Optimus 和 Wi-Fi 7

Cons

- 显示屏显示光栅效果和持续的 PWM 闪烁
- 焊接 RAM
- 输入设备需要适应一段时间
- 触摸条没有增加任何价值
- 性价比不高

评语:全新 XPS 设计作为 16 英寸设备效果更佳

戴尔 XPS 16 9640 评测。测试设备由德国戴尔公司提供。
戴尔 XPS 16 9640 评测。测试设备由德国戴尔公司提供。

总的来说,新款戴尔 XPS 16 给人的印象要好于较小的 更小的 14 英寸机型。尽管重量很重,但这款笔记本电脑的设计并不会让人感觉非常笨重,而且由于边框纤薄,它的占地面积也比竞争对手要好。即便如此,你也必须注意到,这款机型也将设计放在了首位,尤其是采用了 60 瓦的 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的图形性能只能算一般。反过来,尽管流星湖处理器与旧款猛禽湖处理器相比没有任何优势,但它的 CPU 性能还是不错的。

该设备的 4K OLED 触摸屏显示出良好的画质和准确的色彩,但与目前最先进的 OLED 面板相比,在观看浅色内容时,你会发现明显的光栅效应,此外,其 90-Hz 的刷新率也不再完全与时俱进。它的新输入设备也不是最好的,因为键盘需要一些时间来适应,特别是触摸栏在日常使用中相当不便。在连接性方面,你只能使用三个 USB-C 端口,就像在较小的 XPS 14 上一样,而配备 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的较昂贵的 XPS 16 似乎只有 2x Thunderbolt 端口,两款较弱的机型都配备了 3x Thunderbolt 4 端口。

戴尔 XPS 16 在注重设计的同时也提供了良好的 CPU 性能,但其输入设备的人体工学设计和 GPU 性能却因此受到了影响。此外,2899 美元的售价也非常昂贵。

对于这款笔记本电脑的扬声器和运行时间,我们没有什么负面评价,总的来说,它的构造和外壳稳定性很好--尽管我们的测试样品在两个 USB-C 端口之间发现了一个小的构造缺陷。即使在负载情况下,其表面温度仍然很低,但风扇的声音很大,而且我们注意到所有能耗曲线之间没有太大差异。配置选项有很多限制,尤其是在内存方面。您最多可以选择 64 GB 内存,但只能与 Core Ultra 9 185H 结合使用。

你必须清楚一点,那就是性能并不是 XPS 16 的独特卖点--竞争对手提供的性能要高得多,尤其是在图形处理器领域。同时,戴尔 XPS 16 的售价高达 2,899 美元,性价比极高,而且很多竞争对手的性价比更高。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

新款 XPS 16 9640 目前可直接向戴尔公司订购,起价为1,699 美元

Dell XPS 16 9640 - 04/09/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
86 / 98 → 88%
Pointing Device
85%
Connectivity
70 / 80 → 87%
Weight
61 / 20-72 → 79%
Battery
89 / 95 → 94%
Display
79%
Games Performance
99 / 90 → 100%
Application Performance
96 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
91%
Noise
85 / 95 → 90%
Audio
90%
Camera
36 / 85 → 42%
Average
81%
89%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 戴尔 XPS 16 9640 评测--配备 4K OLED 和恼人触控条的多媒体笔记本电脑
Andreas Osthoff, 2024-04-12 (Update: 2024-04-12)