Zotac GamingGeForce RTX 4070 AMP Airo评论：RTX 3080的性能，比RTX 3070高出200美元
这是一个现场审查，并将随着我们的工作进行而更新。.
尽管自从RTX 4070 Ti发布以来，只有几个月的时间。 RTX 4070 Ti推出后，Nvidia再次以RTX 4070的形式推出了进一步缩小的AD104 GPU。
与RTX 4070 Ti不同的是，Nvidia为599美元的RTX 4070提供创始者版显卡，其禁售令昨天与其他类似价格的附加板（AiB）合作伙伴模型一起解除。
不过，今天是充实的RTX 4070卡的亮相时间。我们有Zotac GamingGeForce RTX 4070 AMP Aimo供我们评测。
虽然RTX 4070 Ti的特点是具有7,680个CUDA核心的全脂AD104芯片，但它的特点是：1.
Zotac RTX 4070 AMP Aimo的售价为70,199英镑或699美元。在印度，该卡有五年的保修期：标准保修期为三年，可再延长两年。
在这篇评论中，我们测试了Zotac的高端RTX 4070产品，看看它与RTX 4070 Ti相比如何，并评估它是否有胆量令人信服地取代GeForce RTX 3080和Radeon RX 6900 XT.
Zotac Gaming RTX 4070 AMP Aimo与其他Nvidia GPU的比较
| 规格 | RTX 4090 FE | RTX 4080 FE | 华硕TUF RTX 4070 Ti | ZotacRTX 4070 AMP Aimo | RTX 3090 Ti FE | RTX 3090 FE | RTX 3080 Ti FE | RTX 3080 FE | RTX 3070 FE | TitanRTX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 芯片 | AD102 | AD103 | AD104 | AD104 | GA102 | GA102 | GA102 | GA102 | GA104 | TU102 |
| FinFET工艺 | 定制4N | 定制4N | 定制4N | 定制4N | 8纳米 | 8纳米 | 8纳米 | 8纳米 | 8纳米 | 12纳米 |
| CUDA核心 | 16,384 | 9,728 | 7,680 | 5,888 | 10,752 | 10,496 | 10,240 | 8,704 | 5,888 | 4,608 |
| 纹理单元 | 512 | 304 | 240 | 184 | 336 | 328 | 320 | 272 | 184 | 288 |
| 张量核心 | 512 第四代 | 304 第四代 | 240 第四代 | 184 第四代 | 336 第三代 | 328 第三代 | 320 第三代 | 272 第三代 | 184 第三代 | 576 第二代。 |
| RT核心 | 128 第三代 | 76 第三代 | 60 第三代 | 46 第三代 | 84 第二代 | 82 第二代 | 80 第二代 | 68 第二代 | 46 第二代 | 72 |
| GPU基础时钟 | 2,235 MHz | 2,205 MHz | 2,310 MHz | 1,920MHz | 1,560 MHz | 1,395 MHz | 1,365 MHz | 1,440 MHz | 1,500 MHz | 1,350 MHz |
| GPU提升时钟 | 2,520 MHz | 2,505 MHz | 2,760 MHz | 2,535 MHz | 1,860 MHz | 1,695 MHz | 1,665 MHz | 1,710 MHz | 1,750 MHz | 1,770 MHz |
| 内存总线 | 384位 | 256位 | 192位 | 192位 | 384位 | 384位 | 384位 | 320位 | 256位 | 384位 |
| 内存带宽 | 1,008 GB/s | 716.8 GB/s | 504 GB/s | 504 GB/s | 1,008 GB/s | 936 GB/s | 912 GB/s | 760 GB/s | 448 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| 视频存储器 | 24 GB GDDR6X | 16 GB GDDR6X | 12 GB GDDR6X | 12 GB GDDR6X | 24 GB GDDR6X | 24 GB GDDR6X | 12 GB GDDR6X | 10 GB GDDR6X | 8 GB GDDR6 | 24 GB GDDR6 |
| 功耗 | 450 W | 320 W | 285 W | 200 W | 450 W | 350 W | 350 W | 320 W | 220 W | 280 W |
测试台：RTX 4070 AMP Aimo与英特尔酷睿i9-13900K配对使用
我们的测试台仍然与我们以前用于RTX 40评测的台子一样，包括RTX 4090 FE、RTX 4080 FE和RTX 4070 Ti。规格包括：
- Cooler MasterFrame 700测试台
- 英特尔酷睿i9-13900K
- Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Master主板
- 用于基准测试和游戏的技嘉Aorus 4代2TB NVMe SSD
- 2个16GB金士顿Fury Renegade DDR5-6400内存，定时32-39-39-80，电压1.40V
- Gigabyte M28U 4K 144 Hz显示器
- Cooler Master MasterLiquid ML360L V2 ARGB AIO 散热器
- Thermaltake ToughPower Grand RGB 850
- 重新安装Windows 11 22H2和最新的补丁，并提供测试的Game Ready驱动版本531.42。
合成的基准测试：RTX 3080级别的性能，远远落后于RTX 4070 Ti
Zotac RTX 4070 AMP Aimo的位置仅高于 AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT的整体合成基准性能，并领先于 RTX 3080平均约6%。RTX 4070 AMP Airo落后于 RTX 4070 Ti平均落后19%。
尽管RTX 4070 Ti紧跟在Radeon RX 7900 XT的后面。 Radeon RX 7900 XT在累积的合成测试中，AMD的第二梯队旗舰产品与RTX 4070 AMP Aimo相比，有34%的领先优势。
Zotac最好的RTX 4070产品在3DMarkFire Strike Graphics中设法比RTX 3080平均水平有一个体面的领先优势，但在测试的Ultra和Extreme变体中没有明显的优势。
在Time Spy Graphics中，RTX 4070 AMP Aimo只能以微弱的优势超越RX 6800 XT。相对于RTX 4070 Ti的性能似乎有22%的缺陷。
在Unigine叠加测试中，RTX 4070 AMP Aimo试图缩小与RTX 4070 Ti在720p下的平均差距，但该卡在更高的分辨率下受到了打击。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 47838 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 272162 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 80436 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 36970 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 20698 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 18120 points | |
Help | ||
计算性能：在选定的测试中比安培旗舰机有良好的提升
计算基准显示出与以前类似的趋势，在V-Ray 5中，RTX 4070 AMP Aimo落后于RTX 4070 Ti的平均水平，差距高达20%。然而，V-Ray 4.1 GPU看到Zotac的最新产品非常接近于 Aorus RTX 4070 Ti Master导致比RTX 3080平均水平高出51%的巨大收益。
Zotac的RTX 4070卡设法在教室Optix中以半秒的时间击败RTX 3080 Ti 的平均值。
LuxMark看到RTX 4070 AMP Aimo令人信服地甩在了后面，甚至超过了 Radeon RX 7900 XTX而比RTX 4080 Founders Edition慢了29%左右。 RTX 4080 Founders Edition.然而，AMD RDNA 2卡继续在Sala GPU的排行榜上占据优势。
| V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition (v4.10.07 ) | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Average of class Desktop (70 - 1886, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti (1056 - 1076, n=3) | |
| Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Master (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 AMP Airo (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti AMP Extreme Holo (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (781 - 877, n=17) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti (854 - 855, n=3) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (636 - 643, n=2) | |
| Average NVIDIA Titan RTX (386 - 439, n=16) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure (v4.10.07 ) | |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
光线追踪性能
| Control - 1920x1080 High Quality Preset & High Ray Tracing Preset (DX12) | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti AMP Extreme Holo | |
| Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Master | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti (123.5 - 129.1, n=4) | |
| Average of class Desktop (101.8 - 134.7, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti (111 - 120.6, n=3) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (91.4 - 122.6, n=5) | |
| Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 AMP Airo | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (98.1 - 103, n=2) | |
| Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure | |
| Average NVIDIA Titan RTX (63 - 120, n=3) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (SAM ENABLED) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
| Watch Dogs Legion - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing (DX12) | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Master | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti (98.9 - 99.4, n=2) | |
| Average of class Desktop (75.3 - 99.9, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti AMP Extreme Holo | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (75.7 - 110, n=3) | |
| Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 AMP Airo | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti () | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (70.9 - 71.3, n=2) | |
| Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (SAM ENABLED) | |
| Average NVIDIA Titan RTX () | |
| The Callisto Protocol - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (without FSR Upscaling) + Full Ray-Tracing | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 () | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| Average of class Desktop (82 - 97.6, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti (82.1 - 97.5, n=4) | |
| Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Master | |
| Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 AMP Airo | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti () | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 () | |
| Average NVIDIA Titan RTX () | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 188.3 | 188.1 | 187.3 | 161.7 | 138.4 | 145.7 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 350 | 168.6 | 116.9 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 281.8 | 255.9 | 244.3 | 229.9 | 210.7 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 237 | 230 | 175.8 | 133.7 | 74 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 244 | 214 | 162.9 | 136.5 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 611 | 478 | 375 | 321 | 222 | 121 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 256 | 239 | 162.6 | 83.7 | ||
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 159.4 | 129.4 | 103.8 | 65 | ||
| Control (2019) | 159.5 | 101.8 | 50.2 | |||
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 183.2 | 154.5 | 110.8 | 58.8 | ||
| Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) | 207 | 141.1 | 72.3 | |||
| Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 163.7 | 124.4 | 93.3 | 49.5 | ||
| F1 2021 (2021) | 617 | 530 | 421 | 218 | 160.3 | 89.7 |
| Far Cry 6 (2021) | 188 | 172 | 133 | 74 | ||
| Dying Light 2 (2022) | 135.2 | 92.7 | 45.8 | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 139.3 | 124.9 | 80.9 | 36.7 | ||
| Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) | 264 | 261 | 165.4 | 73.6 | ||
| F1 22 (2022) | 378 | 372 | 296 | 111.8 | 71.9 | 36.7 |
| Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022) | 124.7 | 121.4 | 92.8 | 54.8 | ||
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 149 | 143 | 103 | 62 | ||
| The Callisto Protocol (2022) | 185 | 121.6 | 89.6 | 52 | ||
| The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) | 141.3 | 120.4 | 75.2 | 38.4 |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
