带 0.5 升机箱的 Geekom A7 评测：配备 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS、32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB SSD 的高级迷你 PC
Geekom A7 是一款具有现代设计风格的时尚迷你电脑。制造商并非只是简单地更新产品，而是对外壳进行了全新的开发。凭借高品质的材料和出色的功能，这款迷你电脑是一款出色的设备，也能处理耗电量大的应用。在基本配置中，一台 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS配备 32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD。而顶级型号则配备了 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS配备 32 GB 内存和 2 TB SSD。这一配置也是本次评测的基础。就价格而言，我们测试样品的 899 欧元似乎有点高，尽管类似配置的设备也处于类似水平。如果你觉得太贵，也可以选择配备 Ryzen 7 的基本设备，价格为 749 欧元。
制造商目前为购买 Geekom A7 提供了诱人的折扣。使用 Core BKOSUIPD（有效期至 2024 年 3 月 10 日）通过亚马逊可以节省 5%，使用代码NBCA20
在内部商店可以节省 20 欧元。
在本次评测中，我们选择了在功能和价格方面类似的竞争对手。您可以在下表中找到概览。
注：原始评论的作者指的是亚马逊网站上的折扣，但 Geekom miniPC 目前在亚马逊网站上的售价约为 639 欧元。
Geekom A7
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 8 x 4 - 5.2 GHz, 60 W PL2 / Short Burst, 35 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon 780M, Core: 2800 MHz, Adrenalin 24.1.1
Memory
32 GB
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Acer N5000, 2048 GB
, M.2-2280, NVMe, 1900 GB free
Weight
417 g, Power Supply: 221 g
Price
899 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82.6 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | 417 g | 38 mm | |
| 87.3 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 750 g | 52.3 mm | |
| 82.8 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | 666 g | 52.3 mm | |
| 82.8 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | 753 g | 58 mm | |
| 83.1 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 558 g | 37 mm | |
| 82.3 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Geekom Mini IT12 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 572 g | 45.6 mm | |
| 82 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | 874 g | 188.5 mm | |
| 78.8 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Khadas Mind i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 438 g | 20 mm |
Geekom A7 详细信息
外壳 - 0.5 升铝制整体机身
Geekom 将 A7 迷你电脑的硬件安装在高品质的金属外壳中。从外观上看，它与 Mac mini 有几分相似。Geekom A7 的尺寸更加紧凑。银色的外观设计极具质感，不仅在视觉上给人留下深刻印象，触感也达到了顶级水平。虽然 Geekom A7 的尺寸相比之下最小，重量也只有 417 克，但设备却非常稳定。
设备 - 带 USB4 的 Geekom A7
尽管设计简约，但 Geekom A7 拥有现代化的连接功能。接口数量尚可，对大多数用户来说应该足够了。Geekom A7 的最大优势可能是 USB4 端口。在接下来的测试过程中，我们将结合外置显卡（可通过该接口连接）来考察其 3D 性能。Geekom A7 还有两个 HDMI 接口。由于两个 USB4 端口也适用于此，这款小型计算设备甚至可以同时控制多达四个屏幕。接口分布合理。由于设计紧凑，机身背面的接口非常靠近，这可能会给大型插头或宽大的 U 盘带来麻烦。反面是倾斜的电源插头，遮住了旁边的 HDMI 接口；正面是快速 SD 读卡器，位于左侧。
SD 读卡器
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Khadas Mind (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Geekom A5 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Geekom A7 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Geekom Mini IT13 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (15.1 - 214, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Khadas Mind (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Geekom A7 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Geekom A5 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Geekom Mini IT13 | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (18.2 - 221, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070C (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
交流
无线通信由联发科 Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 WLAN 模块负责。它可以在 2.4 GHz、5 GHz 和 6 GHz 频率范围内工作。我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器进行了测试测量。原则上，Geekom A7 可以达到很好的传输速率，尽管其竞争对手通常可以提供更好的传输速率。在正常的日常使用中，您不会注意到明显的差异。不过，如果可能的话，应选择 6 GHz 无线网络，以获得最佳性能。
Geekom A7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1367 (1268-1443)
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1106 (177-1337)
Geekom A7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1352 (688-1438)
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1012 (571-1177)
Geekom A7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø858 (827-886)
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø762 (347-841)
Geekom A7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø831 (755-940)
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø768 (738-792)
配件
供货范围不是很广。除了微型电脑本身外，包装盒内还有一个 120 瓦的电源。此外，还包括一根 HDMI 电缆和 Geekom 必送的感谢卡。
维护
由于设计极为紧凑，任何维护工作都能保持在最低限度。此外，Geekom A7 始终预配置有内存和固态硬盘。不过，如果您想更换内存或大容量存储器，也是可以的，因为这些组件都是可拆卸的。底部的螺丝隐藏在胶粘的橡胶脚垫下。通常情况下，拆卸后橡胶脚垫有可能无法正常粘合。拧下四颗螺丝后，底板就可以轻松取下了。不过还是要小心，因为 WLAN 天线线缆的活动空间不大。然后就可以在另一块金属板下轻松取下已安装的组件。必要时，还可以更换 WLAN 模块。要清洁 CPU 风扇，必须拆下包括冷却装置在内的整个电路板。而 CPU 风扇是用四颗螺丝固定在机壳上的。拆卸电路板非常简单，无需特殊工具即可完成。
性能 - AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS，配备 Zen4 内核
Geekom 在 A7 中安装了 AMD 基于 Zen4 的强大 8 核处理器。在我们的测试样本中 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS并支持 32GB DDR5 内存。Geekom 还内置了 2 TB 存储空间的固态硬盘。另外，Geekom A7 也可以配备 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS.由于与顶级机型相似，因此在性能上仅有些许损失。两款处理器都是原生 8 核 16 线程。
测试条件
我们使用平衡
电源计划进行了所有性能测试。BIOS 中没有更改 SoC 的性能和 iGPU 的 RAM 分配（512 MB），而是保持出厂设置。根据我们的测试标准，节能方案仅用于功耗和噪音测量。 测试标准.
处理器
Geekom A7 基于 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS处理器。该 SoC 拥有 8 个内核和 16 个线程，具有良好的多线程性能，同时还采用了 AMD 的 Zen4 架构。由于设备尺寸小巧，该处理器的性能并不理想。尽管如此，该处理器在实际使用中仍能提供相当不错的性能。Geekom A7 可以轻松赶上竞争对手。在完全使用多线程的情况下，我们测试样品的 SoC 不得不向 Minisforum 的两位竞争对手认输。考虑到 Geekom A7 的尺寸，我们预计它的性能会大打折扣。尽管散热能力有限，但制造商似乎已经找到了将 SoC 运行在良好性能极限的好方法。
更多比较和基准测试，请参阅我们的 CPU 对比表.
Performance Rating | Cinebench 2024 | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | Blender | wPrime 2.10 | X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 | WinRAR | TrueCrypt | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 5.0 | Geekbench 4.4 | 3DMark 11 | 7-Zip 18.03 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | R Benchmark 2.5 | LibreOffice | WebXPRT 3 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | 3DMark
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| Geekom A7 | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Khadas Mind | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Khadas Mind | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Geekom A7 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| WinRAR - Result | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Geekom A7 | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Khadas Mind | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Geekom A7 | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Khadas Mind | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| Geekom A7 | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Khadas Mind | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Khadas Mind | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Geekom A7 | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Geekom A7 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| Khadas Mind | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Geekom A7 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Khadas Mind | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Geekom A7 | |
| Khadas Mind | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Geekom A7 与 Cinebench R15 多循环对比
极其紧凑的设计在 Cinebench R15 连续循环测试中遭到了报复。尽管如此 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS的 Geekom A7 仍能提供足够的性能。不过，在连续负载方面，我们的测试样本与 Minisforum 毫无胜算。不到 10% 的性能损失还是可以接受的。在遥测数据的图形分析中，我们看到性能略有下降，这是 CPU 最高温度造成的。不过，性能在后半段又趋于稳定。随着功耗的略微降低，CPU 温度也随之下降，尽管结果仍处于较高水平，达到 2330 点。
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2410 (2285.58-2581.81)
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2605 (2564.1-2649.53)
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2646 (2612.16-2667.2)
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø1878 (1825.15-2068.58)
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1753 (1686.77-2083.33)
Geekom Mini IT12 Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1280 (1241-1619.37)
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2050 (2014.91-2082.68)
Khadas Mind Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Core i7-1360P: Ø1443 (1386.82-1627.54)
系统性能
在系统性能测试中，Geekom A7 的表现始终令人信服。与竞争对手相比，它只需与 Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX在某些方面。尽管使用的是 AMD 处理器，但 Geekom A7 在 Crossmark 测试中的表现同样令人信服，因为英特尔处理器在这里往往占据优势。Geekom 使用 32 GB DDR5 内存，内存速度为 5,600 MT/s。该系统在 AIDA64 测试中也表现出色。
在对 Geekom A7 的测试过程中，我们对其工作速度的主观印象始终是正面的。系统运行速度极快，没有明显的中断现象。
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在延迟方面，Geekom A7 的表现并不令人信服。即使在简单上网时，我们也达到了最大值。在播放 4K 测试视频和短期压力测试时，延迟没有进一步增加。迷你电脑在视频播放方面没有任何问题。iGPU 的使用率仅略低于 30%，只有在开始时才会出现掉帧现象。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Geekom A7 | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Minisforum Neptune Series NAD9 | |
| Maxtang MTN-FP750 | |
| Acemagic AM20 | |
| Morefine M600, 6600U | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储
Geekom 在 A7 的顶级配置中安装了 2 TB 固态硬盘。我们的测试样本包含宏碁（Acer）的一个型号，它也连接了 PCIe 4.0 x4。基准测试结果与所使用的接口相符。我们的测试设备没有发现任何散热问题。Geekom A7 以稳定的性能完成了续航测试。制造商在底部使用了一块金属板进行散热，这样可以将固态硬盘的热量分散到更大的区域。紧凑型设计的缺点是只能容纳一个大容量存储设备。不过，Geekom A7 拥有 2 TB 的存储空间，配置十分丰富。
更多比较和基准，请参阅我们的比较表 。
Acer N5000
Sequential Read:
3677 MB/s
Sequential Write:
3389 MB/s
512K Read:
1081 MB/s
512K Write:
2083 MB/s
4K Read:
33.63 MB/s
4K Write:
104.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
537.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
549.7 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Geekom A7 Acer N5000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4848 (4561.2-4857.36)
Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4795 (3366.33-4823.24)
Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0): Ø6430 (5686.85-6828.93)
Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G: Ø1820 (713.49-2039.48)
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ: Ø5462 (4797.39-5479.86)
Geekom Mini IT12 Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0: Ø2178 (1555.46-2595.65)
ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G: Ø2845 (145.88-3195.22)
Khadas Mind WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00: Ø5222 (4952.01-5235.75)
显卡 - AMD Radeon 780M，带 Navi 基因
使用 AMD Radeon 780M，AMD 再次提高了 iGPU 的性能。作为 AMD Radeon 680MAMD Radeon 780M 基于 AMD 的 Navi 架构，拥有 768 个着色器单元。由于 iGPU 没有自己的 VRAM，因此安装的 RAM 有一部分是留给图形适配器的。在我们的配置中，Geekom 为 A7 提供了高达 32 GB 的内存。不过，默认情况下只为 iGPU 分配了 512 MB，有点少。这个值可以在 BIOS 中手动调整。不过，我们将设备保持在交付状态。
AMD Radeon 780M 在 Geekom A7 上实现了稳定的性能。尽管如此，它还不足以击败所有竞争对手。英特尔之前的 iGPU（Iris Xe 96 EU）也不具竞争力。只有新的英特尔 Arc iGPU（随 Meteor Lake 一起推出）才能在一定程度上缩小与 AMD 的差距。
有关进一步的比较和基准测试，请参阅我们的GPU 比较表 。
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | Unigine Valley 1.0 | Unigine Superposition | ComputeMark v2.1 | LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | Affinity Photo 2
| Geekom A7, AMD Radeon 780M R9 7940HS | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX, AMD Radeon 780M R7 7840HS | Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro, AMD Radeon 780M R9 7940HS | Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX, AMD Radeon 680M R9 6900HX | Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i7-1360P | Geekom Mini IT12, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i7-1260P | ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro, AMD Radeon 680M R9 6900HX | Khadas Mind, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i7-1360P | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPECviewperf 12 | -1% | 3% | 19% | -61% | -66% | 33% | -64% | -24% | |
| 1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05) | 84.7 | 85 0% | 77.3 -9% | 75.3 -11% | 41 -52% | 38.7 -54% | 87.4 3% | 37.8 -55% | 75.4 ? -11% |
| 1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) | 89 | 89.8 1% | 65.5 -26% | 70.3 -21% | 35.4 -60% | 38.5 -57% | 77.3 -13% | 39.4 -56% | 64.2 ? -28% |
| 1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) | 55.4 | 51.1 -8% | 48.2 -13% | 45.2 -18% | 27.4 -51% | 7.52 -86% | 51.3 -7% | 7.37 -87% | 37 ? -33% |
| 1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) | 20.7 | 20.1 -3% | 40.9 98% | 76.1 268% | 0.32 -98% | 0.41 -98% | 80.4 288% | 0.46 -98% | 13.3 ? -36% |
| 1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) | 69.7 | 73.4 5% | 60.8 -13% | 58.3 -16% | 39.2 -44% | 36.5 -48% | 73.2 5% | 41.3 -41% | 64 ? -8% |
| 1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) | 60.5 | 61.7 2% | 65 7% | 44 -27% | 11.5 -81% | 11.2 -81% | 51.3 -15% | 12 -80% | 28.5 ? -53% |
| 1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) | 30.3 | 30.1 -1% | 28.1 -7% | 30.1 -1% | 17.7 -42% | 16.7 -45% | 33.6 11% | 21.2 -30% | 35.3 ? 17% |
| 1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) | 116 | 113 -3% | 103 -11% | 88.8 -23% | 46 -60% | 43.7 -62% | 108 -7% | 41.6 -64% | 72.4 ? -38% |
| SPECviewperf 13 | 4% | -13% | -16% | -59% | -60% | -6% | -57% | -18% | |
| 3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | 83.9 | 86.1 3% | 77.9 -7% | 76.7 -9% | 40.5 -52% | 37.9 -55% | 87.6 4% | 39 -54% | 74.8 ? -11% |
| Catia (catia-05) | 130 | 132 2% | 94.4 -27% | 105 -19% | 49 -62% | 56.3 -57% | 118 -9% | 57.1 -56% | 91.4 ? -30% |
| Creo (creo-02) | 93.4 | 93.6 0% | 81.7 -13% | 78.4 -16% | 39.5 -58% | 36.8 -61% | 83.5 -11% | 37.5 -60% | 73 ? -22% |
| Energy (energy-02) | 23.8 | 25.8 8% | 21.9 -8% | 13.9 -42% | 4.32 -82% | 4.29 -82% | 14.6 -39% | 4.34 -82% | 17.7 ? -26% |
| Maya (maya-05) | 107 | 108 1% | 91.1 -15% | 99 -7% | 47.2 -56% | 42.9 -60% | 109 2% | 46.3 -57% | 97.5 ? -9% |
| Medical (medical-02) | 77.6 | 79.8 3% | 53.2 -31% | 44.9 -42% | 15.2 -80% | 14 -82% | 63.1 -19% | 16 -79% | 37.6 ? -52% |
| Showcase (showcase-02) | 25.4 | 30 18% | 28.1 11% | 30.4 20% | 18.1 -29% | 16.8 -34% | 33.6 32% | 21.4 -16% | 35 ? 38% |
| Solidworks (sw-04) | 109 | 107 -2% | 98.4 -10% | 95 -13% | 55.8 -49% | 54.1 -50% | 101 -7% | 53.7 -51% | 76.6 ? -30% |
| SPECviewperf 2020 | 2% | -22% | -7% | -66% | -62% | -9% | -64% | -12% | |
| 3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 11.1 | 12 8% | 7.51 -32% | 8.59 -23% | 2.66 -76% | 3.37 -70% | 12.1 9% | 2.67 -76% | 7.85 ? -29% |
| 3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 14.1 | 15.4 9% | 11.2 -21% | 16.9 20% | 3.03 -79% | 7.39 -48% | 7.98 -43% | 2.97 -79% | 11.3 ? -20% |
| 3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 31.4 | 31.4 0% | 26.1 -17% | 28.9 -8% | 15.1 -52% | 15.1 -52% | 31 -1% | 16.9 -46% | 30.7 ? -2% |
| 3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 24.8 | 24.4 -2% | 19.7 -21% | 20.4 -18% | 7.87 -68% | 8.23 -67% | 21.3 -14% | 8.82 -64% | 18.6 ? -25% |
| 3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 20.9 | 21 0% | 14 -33% | 17.5 -16% | 9.81 -53% | 9.65 -54% | 19.1 -9% | 10.1 -52% | 22.5 ? 8% |
| 3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 61.4 | 61.5 0% | 52.3 -15% | 58.5 -5% | 6.2 -90% | 6.23 -90% | 59.7 -3% | 6.01 -90% | 37.2 ? -39% |
| 3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 47 | 47.2 0% | 39 -17% | 47.4 1% | 24.7 -47% | 23.7 -50% | 47.5 1% | 27.8 -41% | 58.9 ? 25% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
2% | -11% /
-10% | -1% /
-1% | -62% /
-62% | -63% /
-63% | 6% /
7% | -62% /
-61% | -18% /
-18% |
| 3DMark 05 Standard | 53727 points | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 42323 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 41622 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13642 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 162902 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36908 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7733 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 4174 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3324 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
虽然 AMD Radeon 780M虽然只是 iGPU，但该机型的 3D 性能不俗。使用 Geekom A7 可以以可用的帧速率运行许多游戏。不过，性能差异很大，不能一概而论地适用于所有游戏。如果偶尔想用 Geekom A7 玩游戏，应增加分配给 iGPU 的内存。可以在 BIOS 中选择游戏模式，然后将 AMD Radeon 780M 分配给 4 GB 的已安装内存。
要详细了解 iGPU 与其他显卡相比的性能，请参阅我们的GPU 游戏列表 。
The Witcher 3 | Borderlands 3 | GTA V | Far Cry 5 | Far Cry New Dawn | Dota 2 Reborn | F1 2020 | GRID Legends | Shadow of the Tomb Raider
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Geekom A7 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Khadas Mind | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Geekom A7 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
| Khadas Mind | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| GTA V | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
| Geekom A7 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| Khadas Mind | |
| 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Geekom A7 | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Khadas Mind | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| F1 2020 | |
| 1280x720 Ultra Low Preset | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Geekom A7 | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX | |
| Geekom A7 | |
| ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro | |
| Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 | |
Witcher 3 FPS chart
Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M: Ø25.7 (20-33)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 167.5 | 157.4 | 66.6 | 25.7 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 154.6 | 99.3 | 49.6 | 32.5 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 155.8 | 120.6 | 87.6 | 81 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 70.3 | 33.4 | 25 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 67.6 | 48.2 | 40.7 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 86 | 47 | 43 | 41 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 96.7 | 37.1 | 32.1 | 35.6 |
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 75 | 44 | 41 | 39 |
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 89 | 34.5 | 27.5 | |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 100.5 | 38.6 | 25.8 | 22 |
| F1 2020 (2020) | 199.1 | 100.3 | 78.7 | 54 |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 225 | 113.4 | 79.5 | 36.5 |
| God of War (2022) | 32 | 25.8 | 20.5 | 15.1 |
| GRID Legends (2022) | 104.4 | 81.7 | 62.5 | 49.2 |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 48.8 | 36.2 | 29.9 | 26.5 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 96.9 | 88.4 | 65.1 | 18.5 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 72.1 | 54.4 | 49.2 | 13.9 |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 90.8 | 65.1 | 54.1 | 46.9 |
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 175.8 | 134.9 | 130.5 |
配备两个 eGPU 的 Geekom A7 性能测试
由于 Geekom A7 有一个 USB4 端口，因此可以连接外置显卡来提高 3D 性能。我们测试了 Geekom A7 与 GPD G1以及一次与 Razer Core X 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 的组合测试。在这两种配置下，3D 性能的提升都非常明显。现代游戏也能在 1440p 下流畅运行。不过，必须接受 USB4 接口的限制，因为 PCIe 3.0 x4 最多只能用于外置显卡。相比之下，Geekom A7 与 Razer Core X 和 英伟达GeForce RTX 3060 Ti取得了优异的成绩。GPD G1 eGPU 与我们的测试样品的组合也令人信服。不过，我们也可以看到，由于使用了 USB4 连接，性能略有下降。如果通过 OCuLink 接口使用 GPD G1，性能有望提高约 10%。原生 OCuLink 接口由 Minisfoum EliteMini UM780 XTX.
配备 GPD G1 的 Geekom A7（AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT）
Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Unigine Superposition | Unigine Valley 1.0 | Unigine Heaven 4.0 | ComputeMark v2.1
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 3DMark | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Unigine Superposition | |
| 1280x720 720p Low | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p High | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
| Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Extreme Preset DX11 | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| ComputeMark v2.1 | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Score | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
| GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT (120 Watt, OCuLink @PCIe x4 4.0) | |
| Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 177.5 | 170.8 | 146.4 | 82.8 | 62.5 | 69.6 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 170.3 | 124.1 | 113.2 | 98.7 | 72.4 | 52.8 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 93.1 | 70.7 | 67.8 | 55.7 | 54.4 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 201 | 129.4 | 82.9 | 56.6 | 31 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 73.4 | 52.3 | 38.7 | 29.3 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 114 | 98 | 93 | 86 | 81 | 48 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 231 | 182.2 | 164.9 | 151 | 108.5 | 61 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 167.7 | 128 | 121.4 | 106.1 | 67.8 | 30.2 |
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 106 | 89 | 79 | 69 | 65 | 51 |
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 55.5 | 31.9 | 30.7 | 29.2 | 27.3 | 10.7 |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 108.4 | 95 | 85.7 | 76.5 | 59 | 31.5 |
| F1 2020 (2020) | 302 | 194.8 | 162.4 | 113.8 | 90.9 | 56.2 |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 237 | 196.8 | 132.9 | 85 | 66.5 | 34.4 |
| Far Cry 6 (2021) | 96.5 | 83.8 | 72.7 | 62.2 | 50.4 | |
| God of War (2022) | 76 | 75.8 | 74.6 | 65.3 | 53 | 33.7 |
| GRID Legends (2022) | 99.4 | 78.6 | 61.8 | 55.3 | 51.7 | 44.5 |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 171.5 | 126.7 | 86.2 | 68.5 | 50.1 | 27.1 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 118.8 | 112.9 | 88.2 | 43.1 | 29.8 | |
| F1 23 (2023) | 131.5 | 128.8 | 107.9 | 32.7 | 18.5 | |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 290.8 | 144.5 | 108.2 | 81.9 | 59 | 31.9 |
| Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 41 | 33 | 26 | 21 | 14 | 6 |
配备 Razer Core X 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 的 Geekom A7
Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Unigine Superposition | Unigine Valley 1.0 | Unigine Heaven 4.0 | ComputeMark v2.1
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 3DMark | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Unigine Superposition | |
| 1280x720 720p Low | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p High | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
| Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Extreme Preset DX11 | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| ComputeMark v2.1 | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Score | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
| Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) | |
| Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Intel NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Minisforum Venus Series UM690 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3) | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 184.4 | 179.7 | 171.7 | 109.9 | 93.2 | 101.9 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 257 | 175.9 | 130.6 | 66.6 | 58.1 | 68.3 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 171 | 157.7 | 150.8 | 141.9 | 111.3 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 212 | 145.3 | 100.6 | 77.4 | 48.8 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 141.3 | 121.9 | 96.6 | 83.3 | |||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 151 | 126 | 121 | 113 | 99 | 59 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 234 | 183 | 175.9 | 165.8 | 133.5 | 86.2 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 155 | 121.2 | 118.3 | 113.5 | 91.4 | 53 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 120 | 108 | 104 | 94 | 88 | 60 | |
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 139 | 89.7 | 68 | 51.3 | 44.9 | 33.2 | |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 149.9 | 128.3 | 104 | 85.2 | 65.5 | 38.5 | |
| F1 2020 (2020) | 232 | 138.4 | 138.7 | 110.1 | 92.2 | 62.6 | |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 156.5 | 121.1 | 78.9 | 59 | 55.5 | 46.5 | |
| Far Cry 6 (2021) | 80.6 | 69.1 | 57.6 | 50.5 | 49 | ||
| GRID Legends (2022) | 126.1 | 97.6 | 81 | 68.7 | 62.3 | 50.1 | |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 178.4 | 141.1 | 101.2 | 82 | 62.1 | 36.3 | |
| F1 22 (2022) | 71.7 | 64.3 | 50.7 | 32.2 | 30.7 | 19.8 | |
| F1 23 (2023) | 77.9 | 77.8 | 63.1 | 39.5 | 34.6 | 27.4 | 12.4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 95.6 | 80.2 | 70.6 | 63.4 | 44.2 | 22.1 | |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 302.5 | 174.9 | 104.3 | 79 | 63.3 | 39.5 | |
| Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 70 | 64 | 57 | 45 | 32 | 11 |
排放 - 经济型 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
噪音排放
Geekom A7 是一款极其小巧的迷你电脑，同时还配备了现代高端处理器。内置的冷却装置旨在控制 SoC 温度，但相对较小。开机后仅能短时间静音运行。不过，设备升温很快，即使在空闲状态下，风扇也必须转动。Geekom A7 的噪音约为 34 dB(A)，工作时非常安静。在平均负载和压力测试中，声压级差别不大。我们测试样本的峰值为 43.3 dB(A)。不过，这并不意味着 Geekom A7 是声音最大的设备。ACEMagician AM08Pro 和 Khadas Mind 的音量要大得多。英特尔 NUC 13 Pro 的噪音为 42 dB(A)，也明显低于我们的测试设备。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 33.3 / 33.6 / 33.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 43.3 / 43.3 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.4 dB(A) | ||
| Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Geekom Mini IT12 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | Khadas Mind i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 15% | 10% | 1% | 9% | 11% | -3% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 25.4 | 24.8 2% | 29.7 -17% | 30 -18% | 25.2 1% | 29.8 -17% | 30 -18% | 25.2 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 33.3 | 28.5 14% | 31.7 5% | 33.2 -0% | 28.1 16% | 29.9 10% | 31.3 6% | 34.4 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 33.6 | 28.5 15% | 31.7 6% | 33.6 -0% | 28.2 16% | 30.1 10% | 31.3 7% | 34.4 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33.7 | 28.7 15% | 31.7 6% | 33.6 -0% | 28.3 16% | 30.2 10% | 31.4 7% | 34.5 -2% |
| Load Average * | 43.3 | 32.4 25% | 32.8 24% | 36.8 15% | 42 3% | 32.1 26% | 47.6 -10% | 44.7 -3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.2 | 32.7 24% | 32.8 24% | 49 -13% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 43.3 | 39.6 9% | 35.2 19% | 39.8 8% | 42.1 3% | 32.5 25% | 47.8 -10% | 50.4 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在压力测试中，铝制外壳保持相对低温，仅偶尔超过 40 °C。Geekom 为 A7 设计了复杂的散热概念。新鲜空气从两侧吸入，直接从机身后部吹出。因此，我们看到机身后部的温度最高。最高温度为 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS在 Prime95 压力测试中达到 95.3 ℃。开始时，SoC 会短暂达到 60 瓦，这也导致了最高温度。随着测试的进行，功耗不得不有所降低，随后处理器的功耗稳定在 35 瓦。不过，CPU 温度仅略有下降，略低于 90 °C。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Mini PC.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.7 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.7 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.
耗电量
就功耗而言，Geekom A7 是一款非常经济的设备。在空闲状态下，我们的测试样品是比较中最经济的设备之一：我们在插座处测得的功耗仅为 3.8 至 6.5 瓦。在平均负载情况下，我们测得的功率略低于 72 瓦，不过在短时间内也达到了约 95 瓦的峰值。Geekom A7 配备了 120 瓦的电源装置，在我们的测试过程中，它从未出现过供电问题。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 1.4 / 3 Watt |
| Idle | 3.8 / 4.8 / 6.5 Watt |
| Load |
71.9 / 94.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTX R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HX R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Geekom Mini IT12 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 Pro R9 6900HX, Radeon 680M | Khadas Mind i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Average AMD Radeon 780M | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -67% | -22% | -50% | -45% | -20% | -69% | -50% | -31% | -85% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.8 | 8.5 -124% | 4.6 -21% | 6.8 -79% | 7 -84% | 5 -32% | 9.6 -153% | 7.8 -105% | 6.11 ? -61% | 9.69 ? -155% |
| Idle Average * | 4.8 | 10.5 -119% | 6 -25% | 9.4 -96% | 9.2 -92% | 7 -46% | 9.9 -106% | 10.9 -127% | 8.32 ? -73% | 11.9 ? -148% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.5 | 12.9 -98% | 10.6 -63% | 13.7 -111% | 11.8 -82% | 10.7 -65% | 11.8 -82% | 11.8 -82% | 10.6 ? -63% | 15.2 ? -134% |
| Load Average * | 71.9 | 67.2 7% | 72.5 -1% | 45.3 37% | 45 37% | 50.3 30% | 77.5 -8% | 39.2 45% | 56.1 ? 22% | 59 ? 18% |
| Load Maximum * | 94.7 | 97.2 -3% | 94.6 -0% | 94.8 -0% | 97.2 -3% | 82 13% | 89.8 5% | 76.4 19% | 74.9 ? 21% | 100.5 ? -6% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 95.7 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption with external monitor
Geekom A7; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø70 (57.2-94.7)
Geekom A7; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø73 (64.8-85.1)
Geekom A7; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø72.8 (57.4-85.5)
Geekom A7; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø73.1 (66.4-82.2)
Geekom A7; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.81 (3.82-6.48)
Geekom A7; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø71.9 (56.1-82.9)
Geekom A7; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø28.7 (24.1-75.1)
Geekom A7; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø66.2 (63.5-84.2)
Pros
+ 极其紧凑的 0.5 升外壳
+ 高品质材料
+ AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS，8 核 16 线程
+ 高系统性能
+ 采用 RDNA3 架构的现代而强大的 iGPU
+ 高速内存（DDR5-5600 MT/s）
+ 多种连接选项，包括 USB4
+ 最多可同时使用四个屏幕
+ 功耗相对较低
+ 固态硬盘容量大，存储空间达 2 TB
+ 支持 UHS 的 SD 读卡器
+ 36 个月保修
Cons
- 冷却装置迅速达到极限
- 胶合橡胶脚垫
- 高 DPC 延迟
- 带角度的电源插头
评语：出色的设计和良好的性能有其价格优势
通过 A7，Geekom 在最小的空间内设计出了一款配备高端处理器的极其时尚的迷你电脑。处理器 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS凭借 8 个内核提供了出色的多线程性能，不过由于设计紧凑，在连续负载情况下性能略有下降。尽管如此，在 CPU 平均性能比对中，该制造商仍能与竞争对手媲美。小型散热装置在单项性能上对 Geekom A7 进行了报复，导致其性能略有下降。不过，在日常使用中，我们无法发现极其明显的性能损失。
Geekom A7 是一款现代迷你电脑，在狭小的空间内拥有卓越的性能。Geekom A7 的做工一流，在选材上也毫不吝啬，堪称高档迷你 PC。
Geekom A7 采用全新设计的高品质外壳。无论从视觉上还是触觉上，Geekom A7 都属于高端产品。Geekom A7 的其他设备也很合适，尽管体积小巧，但连接选项很多。Geekom A7 甚至配备了 USB4 接口，还可以同时使用四个屏幕，比其他大多数迷你 PC 提供了更多的功能。大家应该都清楚，这套设备并不便宜。不过，与竞争对手相比，我们测试配置中的 Geekom A7 899 欧元的价格并不昂贵。如果你想省点钱，A7 还可以配备 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS价格为 749 欧元。与顶级机型相比，性能应该只会略有下降。
在设计方面，制造商确实花了很多心思来开发一款优秀的产品。不过，由于机身小巧，也存在一些局限性。机身后部的外部接口非常靠近，而倾斜的电源插头也不一定有利于连接。冷却装置的性能也受到一定限制。虽然 Geekom A7 在日常使用中不会造成干扰，但在声音方面还是比较明显的。
Geekom A7
- 02/27/2024 v7 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Mini PC - Weighted Average
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
