Notebookcheck Logo

Apple iPad Pro 13 (2024) 评测--几乎只能用 "超级 "来形容的平板电脑

比空气还轻

大型 iPad Pro 现在比以前更薄、更轻。尽管如此，它仍有足够的空间容纳最先进的Apple M4 芯片，现在还拥有 OLED 显示屏。Apple 似乎在其产品系列中拥有一款超级平板电脑。请阅读我们的深度评测，了解有关该设备的所有信息。
Apple iPad Pro iPad Thunderbolt Touchscreen Tablet
iPad Pro 13 与 iPhone 15 Pro Max（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）

Apple iPad Pro 13（2024 年）是 iPad Pro 12.9（2022 年）的直接继任者。 iPad Pro 12.9（2022 年）的直接后续机型。 iPad Pro 11一样，首次采用了 OLED 显示屏。

与前代产品相比，新款 iPad Pro 明显更轻、更薄，甚至比 iPad Air 更轻、更薄。 iPad Air.最新的 Pro 机型也是首批采用新的Apple 产品。 M4 处理器。.我们的评测机型采用了功能更强大的 M4 处理器，CPU 增加了一个性能核心。

Apple 苹果公司已经停产了 128 GB 机型，并将其他存储配置的价格略微下调了约 30 至 70 欧元（33 至 76 美元）。5G 选项需要额外支付 250 欧元（200 美元），比上一代产品增加了 50 欧元（55 美元）。如果选择纳米纹理显示屏玻璃，价格将再增加 130 欧元（100 美元），这意味着 iPad Pro 13 的售价可能高达 3,139 欧元（2,599 美元）。下表为定价概览：

存储 价格（Wi-Fi 机型） 5G 选件的成本 纳米纹理玻璃选件的成本
256GB 1,549 欧元（1,299 美元） +250 欧元（200 美元） -
512GB €1,799 (US$1,499) +€250 (US$200) -
1,024 GB €2,279 (US$1,899) +€250 (US$200) +€130 (US$100)
2,048 GB €2,759 (US$2,299) +€250 (US$200) +€130 (US$100)
iPad Pro 13 (2024)
Processor
Apple M4 (10 cores) 10 x 2.9 - 4.5 GHz
Graphics adapter
Apple M4 10-core GPU
Memory
16 GB 
Display
13.00 inch 4:3, 2752 x 2064 pixel 265 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, Tandem OLED, Antireflective coating, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
1 TB NAND Flash, 1024 GB 
, 987.13 GB free
Connections
1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 3.0 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Digital compass, iBeacon, Three-axis Gyro, Accelerometer, Barometer, Face ID, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.1 x 281.6 x 215.5
Battery
38.99 Wh, 10209 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 3.82 V, two cells
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Apple iPadOS 17.5
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.8) + LiDAR Scanner
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: Quad, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB-Cabel, 12 Months Warranty, HDR: HLG, HDR10, Dolby Vision, fanless
Weight
579 g
Price
2279 Euro
Amazon
$1,099.00
Links
Apple homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Version
Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
v889.2 %
07 / 2024
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU		579 g5.1 mm13.00"2752x2064
v7 (old)90.6 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740		732 g5.5 mm14.60"2960x1848
v7 (old)89.3 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		590 g6.26 mm12.40"3048x2032
v885.7 %
06 / 2024
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2, M2 10-Core GPU		617 g6.1 mm13.00"2732x2048
v874.8 %
06 / 2024
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4		615 g6.9 mm12.70"2944x1840
v7 (old)89.6 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910		580 g5.5 mm13.20"2880x1920

注：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息请点击https://www.notebookcheck.net/Our-new-rating-system-v8-explained-Lower-but-more-realistic-scores-together-with-sustainability-assessment.853123.0.html.

外壳 - 超薄、超轻，但无 IP 认证

Apple iPad Pro 13 有银色和太空灰两种颜色，根据其规格，厚度仅为 5.1 毫米（0.2 英寸）。在我们的测量中，该设备甚至薄了半毫米。摄像头凸起突出了 2.3 毫米（0.09 英寸），导致某些位置的最大厚度达到 7.35 毫米（0.29 英寸）。新款 iPad Pro 13 重 579 克（1.28 磅），比前代产品轻 103 克（0.23 磅）。 轻 103 克（0.23 磅甚至比 iPad Air 13 还轻 38 克（0.08 磅 iPad Air 13.

iPad Pro 采用铝制一体成型机身设计，给人的感觉就像整个机身由一整块金属模压而成。显示屏玻璃与机身之间的缝隙也紧密而均匀。按键安装非常牢固，行程短，反馈清晰。当我们尝试扭动平板电脑时，它没有发出任何嘎吱嘎吱的声音，不过确实有些弯曲。总体而言，平板电脑的制造质量非常出色。

iPad Pro 13 没有 SIM 卡插槽，因为它只支持 eSIM 卡。但它也有一个缺点：与三星的高端平板电脑不同，iPad 没有任何 IP 保护等级。

尺寸比较

❌
326.4 mm 208.6 mm 5.5 mm 732 g293.4 mm 190.8 mm 6.9 mm 615 g289.1 mm 196.1 mm 5.5 mm 580 g281.6 mm 215.5 mm 5.1 mm 579 g280.6 mm 214.9 mm 6.1 mm 617 g278.7 mm 191.58 mm 6.26 mm 590 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

可持续性 -Apple 展示透明度

Apple 为客户提供了大量与可持续发展相关的信息。例如， ，称一体式机身外壳完全由可回收铝材制成，整个 iPad Pro 13 含有超过 20% 的可回收材料。根据该公司的计算，256 GB 和 512 GB iPad Pro 机型在整个生命周期内的碳足迹分别为 107 kgApple CO2e和 120 kgCO2e。 没有提供任何有关纳米纹理玻璃、可选蜂窝模块和更高存储容量机型的影响数据。 Apple

iPad Pro 还强调在包装中避免使用塑料，其包装含有 36% 的可回收成分。此外，该产品还使用了回收的稀土元素和金属，如锡、金和铜。有关该平板电脑对环境影响的详细信息，请参阅产品环境报告。.

规格：配备多功能 USB-C 端口的 iPad Pro

USB 端口对于 iPad 来说并不陌生。不过，Apple 在这个小巧的接口中融入了大量技术，使其能够支持 USB4 传输速度（高达 40 Gbit/s）、Thunderbolt 3 以及到外接显示器的有线视频输出。使用 DisplayPort，iPad Pro 可以处理高达 60Hz 的 6K 分辨率。AirPlay 还可实现最高 4K 分辨率的屏幕镜像。

在我们的拷贝测试中，iPad Pro 通过 USB-C 接口实现了 510.59 MB/s 的速度。这里的限制因素是我们的外置存储设备，它最多只能支持 USB 3.2 Gen 2（最大 10 Gbit/s）。iPad Pro 兼容 FAT、FAT32、exFAT、APFS 或 MacOS Extended 格式的存储设备。

摄像头模块配有激光雷达扫描仪。在平板电脑的背面，你还可以找到用于连接可选键盘的触点。

iPad Pro 既不支持 NFC，也不支持 UWB。

左：扬声器、麦克风、扬声器
左：扬声器、麦克风、扬声器
顶部边缘音量控制、Pencil 充电连接器、麦克风
顶部边缘音量控制、Pencil 充电连接器、麦克风
下边缘
下边缘
右侧扬声器、USB 接口、扬声器
右侧扬声器、USB 接口、扬声器

软件 - iPadOS 17.5 并非最佳系统

Apple iPad Pro 13 (2024) 预装了 iPadOS 17.5。像往常一样，可以从 App Store 下载应用程序。消费者通常可以预期 iPad 将获得至少 5 年的更新，实际支持期通常会稍长一些。特别是 Pro 机型，由于其芯片功能强大，很可能成为更新的对象。

App Store 不仅提供种类繁多的应用程序，而且Apple 还免费提供许多基本程序。这些程序包括完整的办公套件（iWorks）、强大的音频制作工具（GarageBand）和基本的视频编辑程序（iMovie）。

舞台管理器（Stage Manager）--你可能会从 macOS 中认出它--为多任务处理提供了便利。此外，用户还可以在分屏视图中显示应用程序，或使用 "滑过 "功能让一个应用程序以较小的窗口悬浮在另一个应用程序之上。尽管如此，考虑到 iPadOS 及其应用程序在使用上的局限性，我们还是希望Apple 平板电脑能配备成熟的 macOS 系统，以提高真正的工作效率。这里的重点显然是创意用途和娱乐。

舞台监督
分屏
侧翻

连接性 - 仅支持 5G 的 iPad Pro 才支持 GNSS

Apple iPad Pro 13 (2024) 支持 Wi-Fi 6E，因此也支持 6GHz Wi-Fi，但遗憾的是，Wi-Fi 7 仍然不可用。与 2022 机型在连接到华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器时，新款 iPad Pro 的 Wi-Fi 速度大大加快，但稳定性仍有待提高。不过，这在日常使用中并不明显。

iPad Pro 可以配置可选的 5G 模块，该模块还支持卫星定位。不过，物理 SIM 卡插槽已成为过去，因为 5G iPad 只能使用 eSIM 卡。

iPad Pro 13 是视频会议的理想之选。它的广角摄像头与 Center Stage 相结合，可让设备自动将用户保持在画面中。你还可以选择使用 iPhone作为网络摄像头。此外，平板电脑上的麦克风可确保用户的声音听起来清晰。

Networking
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
607 (min: 509) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
658 (min: 447) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1196 (min: 901) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
978 (min: 615) MBit/s ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
738 (min: 702) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
952 (min: 490) MBit/s ∼96%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
778 (min: 542) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
953 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1620 (min: 1070) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1437 (min: 1239) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000
801 (min: 769) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
823 (min: 583) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1482 (min: 1401) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1336 (min: 1285) MBit/s ∼93%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
673 (min: 516) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
873 (min: 734) MBit/s ∼88%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
438 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
990 (min: 465) MBit/s ∼100%
0701402102803504204905606307007708409109801050112011901260Tooltip
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1196 (901-1327)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø977 (615-1142)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø606 (509-661)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø737 (702-792)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø658 (447-820)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø936 (490-980)

摄像头 - iPad Pro 13 的实用设置

使用 iPad Pro 13 (2024) 自拍
使用 iPad Pro 13 (2024) 自拍

前置超宽 TrueDepth 摄像头非常适合视频通话，即使平板电脑前方有几个人时也是如此。启用跟踪模式后，平板电脑就会将焦点对准说话的人。摄像头的成像质量在拍照时还不错，但即使在光线良好的条件下，噪点也已经相当高了。前置摄像头能够以高达 60 fps 的速度拍摄全高清视频。

iPad Pro 背面配备了一个 1200 万像素摄像头和一个 LiDAR 扫描仪，可用于创建空间和物体的 3D 图像。前置摄像头拍摄的照片可用于文档记录和视频通话。同样，该摄像头拍摄的图像会显示出一丝噪点，因此会显得有些颗粒感。

后置摄像头可以拍摄高达 60 fps 的超高清视频。ProRes 视频录制功能也可用，但您需要从 App Store 下载相应的应用程序才能使用该功能，因为Apple的相机应用程序不支持该功能，而且此类应用程序通常需要支付昂贵的订阅费用。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain camera5x zoomLow-light
ColorChecker
2.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPad Pro 13 2024: 3.9 ∆E min: 1.47 - max: 6.93 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
54 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
61.2 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
75.3 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
42 ∆E
88.5 ∆E
70.3 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPad Pro 13 2024: 46.67 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 88.45 ∆E

配件和保修 - 仍只有 12 个月的保修期

可选择 AppleCare+。
可选择 AppleCare+。

Apple iPad Pro 13 (2024) 只提供 12 个月的保修服务，但零售商的保修服务不受此影响。保修期可通过 AppleCare+ 计划延长，该计划涵盖无限次的意外损坏事件。每次事故的免赔额为：屏幕损坏 29 欧元（29 美元），其他意外损坏 99 欧元（99 美元）。AppleCare+ 两年计划的一次性费用为 179 欧元（169 美元），月费为 8.99 欧元（8.49 美元）。保修条款和条件可能因地区而异。

包装盒内容相当简约。除了 iPad Pro 本体之外，你只能找到一根织物包裹的 USB-C 数据线、一些文件和一张必填的Apple 贴纸。

输入设备和操作 - iPad，支持 Face ID 和 Pencil

iPad Pro 13 的电容式触摸屏手感非常顺滑，对整个显示屏的输入响应迅速而准确。你不一定需要用手指与屏幕互动，因为 iPad 还支持Apple Pencil (USB-C) 和全新的 Pencil Pro。

该设备采用 Face ID 进行生物识别身份验证。由于这种方法使用 3D 人脸识别，因此被认为非常安全。不过，平板电脑上只能配置一个 Face ID，而且用户配置文件管理只能在教育环境中使用，因此很难与其他用户共享 iPad。

你可以选择连接外置键盘。遗憾的是，为旧机型制造的键盘与当前的 2024 款 iPad Pro 不兼容。

iPad 没有振动电机。

显示屏 - 适用于 iPad Pro 13 的明亮串联 OLED 显示屏

子像素结构
子像素结构

13 英寸显示屏（对角线长 33.02 厘米，面积 523.4 平方厘米）首次采用串联式 OLED 技术。这意味着面板由两层 OLED 组成，不仅提高了亮度和寿命，还降低了功耗。与前代 iPad Pro 的屏幕类似，该显示屏支持高达 120Hz 的刷新率，但在需要时可以降至 10Hz。

启用环境光线传感器后，显示屏在显示纯白图像时已经变得非常明亮，达到了Apple 承诺的水平（1,000cd/m2）。HDR 内容也是如此，在我们的测量中，面板亮度达到了 1,619 cd/m2。屏幕的峰值手动亮度为 569cd/m2。

我们检测到Apple的串联 OLED 闪烁。当屏幕处于最低亮度时，闪烁频率为 240Hz，当手动亮度超过 80% 时，闪烁频率加倍。虽然闪烁幅度不是很大，但由于频率相对较低，敏感的人可能还是会遇到一些问题。

平板电脑还有纳米纹理玻璃可供选择。这是一种亚光表面，据说可以提高屏幕在户外的可读性并消除反光。遗憾的是，我们没能拿到评测机进行测试，但有机会在Apple 商店里看到了这款产品。我们建议您在选择此选项之前也这样做。尽管纳米纹理玻璃能达到预期效果，但与标准玻璃相比，屏幕的对比度更高，哑光表面的黑色显得更灰暗。

1014
cd/m²		1006
cd/m²		1012
cd/m²
1002
cd/m²		1000
cd/m²		1017
cd/m²
1013
cd/m²		1012
cd/m²		1010
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1017 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1009.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.52 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1000 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Tandem OLED, 2752x2064, 13"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED, 2960x1848, 14.6"		Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
IPS, 3048x2032, 12.4"		Apple iPad Air 13 2024
IPS, 2732x2048, 13"		Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
LTPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"		Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
OLED, 2880x1920, 13.2"
Screen
-41%
-57%
-31%
-106%
-1%
Brightness middle
1000
621
-38%
867
-13%
631
-37%
148
-85%
806
-19%
Brightness
1010
620
-39%
810
-20%
589
-42%
139
-86%
803
-20%
Brightness Distribution
98
98
0%
87
-11%
88
-10%
90
-8%
93
-5%
Black Level *
0.58
0.62
0.3
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1.9
-90%
2
-100%
1.5
-50%
3.59
-259%
0.9
10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.5
4.6
-84%
5.5
-120%
3
-20%
5.52
-121%
1.9
24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.6
6%
3
-76%
2.2
-29%
3
-76%
1.6
6%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.12 104%
2.29 96%
2.24 98%
2.243 98%
2.24 98%
CCT
6661 98%
6602 98%
6957 93%
6918 94%
7115 91%
6699 97%
Contrast
1495
1018
493

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz
Amplitude: 25.86 %

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25% 显示屏亮度
25%
50% 显示亮度
50%
75% 显示亮度
75%
最大手动亮度
100%

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

我们的分析证实，iPad Pro 13 显示屏的色彩准确度非常高，没有任何可检测到的异常值。即使关闭了根据环境光线调整显示屏白平衡的 "真实色调"（True Tone）功能，显示屏在默认情况下也略显偏暖。不过，这在日常使用中可能根本不会察觉。

灰度（禁用真实色调，目标色域：sRGB）
灰度（禁用真实色调，目标色域：sRGB）
色彩（禁用真实色调，目标色域：sRGB）
色彩（禁用真实色调，目标色域：sRGB）
色彩空间（禁用 True Tone，目标色域：sRGB）
色彩空间（禁用 True Tone，目标色域：sRGB）
饱和度（禁用真实色调，目标色域：sRGB）
饱和度（禁用真实色调，目标色域：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
0.69 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.304 ms rise
↘ 0.3845 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.606 ms rise
↘ 1.784 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

即使没有纳米纹理玻璃，iPad Pro 13 的屏幕在户外大多数光线条件下也能轻松阅读。唯一的问题是，反光有时会干扰观看体验，尤其是在明亮的阳光下。

使用Apple iPad Pro 13 户外版
室外
使用Apple iPad Pro 13 户外版
使用

Apple iPad Pro 13 (2024) 的可视角度极佳。从不同角度观看显示屏时，我们没有发现任何色彩偏移，但亮度略有降低。

Apple iPad Pro 13 (2024) 的闪烁稳定性
Apple iPad Pro 13 (2024) 的闪烁稳定性

性能 -Apple M4 和最高 16GB 内存

与其较小的同胞兄弟相似 iPad Pro 11iPad Pro 13 配备了 Apple M4.购买 1 TB 或 2 TB 版本的用户将获得配备 10 个（而不是 9 个）CPU 内核的 M4 版本。 九个 CPU 内核以及比基本型号多一倍的内存（16 GB）。我们的评测机是 1 TB 机型。Apple 没有提供使用何种存储的具体信息。但考虑到 M 系列芯片现在配备了内置 SSD 控制器，这很可能就是 iPad Pro 的存储类型。值得注意的是，PassMark 存储测试中超过 3500 MB/s 的写入速度表明情况确实如此。

在基准测试中，10 核 M4 的性能比 9 核版本有明显提升。在 Geekbench 的多核测试中，iPad Pro 13 的性能大幅提升了 10%。不过，单核性能的差异很小，只有 1%。但这并不重要，因为 M4 芯片的性能对于平板电脑来说绰绰有余。如果您打算使用Apple 平板电脑进行视频编辑或复杂的照片编辑，那么额外的内存将发挥更关键的作用。

Geekbench 6.3 | Antutu v10 | CrossMark | Geekbench ML
Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Average Apple M4 (10 cores) (14690 - 15173, n=4)
15016 Points +2%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
14690 Points
Apple iPad Pro 11 2024
13350 Points -9%
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
10120 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
5534 Points -62%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
5176 Points -65%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
4088 Points -72%
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=70, last 2 years)
3544 Points -76%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
2408 Points -84%
Single-Core
Average Apple M4 (10 cores) (3673 - 3838, n=4)
3752 Points +1%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
3715 Points
Apple iPad Pro 11 2024
3662 Points -1%
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
2605 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
2079 Points -44%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
1924 Points -48%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
1174 Points -68%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=70, last 2 years)
1111 Points -70%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
964 Points -74%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
2716980 Points
Average Apple M4 (10 cores) ()
2716980 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2024
2547454 Points -6%
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
1966791 Points -28%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
1516127 Points -44%
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=37, last 2 years)
781418 Points -71%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
503958 Points -81%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Points -100%
CrossMark - Overall
Average Apple M4 (10 cores) (1944 - 2066, n=3)
2020 Points +4%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
1944 Points
Apple iPad Pro 11 2024
1880 Points -3%
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
1468 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
1263 Points -35%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
1153 Points -41%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
834 Points -57%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
773 Points -60%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
656 Points -66%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
4617 Points
Average Apple M4 (10 cores) ()
4617 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (137 - 4617, n=8, last 2 years)
1014 Points -78%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
863 Points -81%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
486 Points -89%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
6806 Points
Average Apple M4 (10 cores) ()
6806 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (66 - 6806, n=8, last 2 years)
1160 Points -83%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
309 Points -95%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
203 Points -97%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (112 - 834, n=6, last 2 years)
380 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
279 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
274 Points
0.6 Core ML Neural Engine
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
9283 Points
Average Apple M4 (10 cores) ()
9283 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (6978 - 9283, n=2, last 2 years)
8131 Points -12%
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
6978 Points -25%

Legend

 
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU, 1 TB NAND Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
 
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
 
Apple iPad Pro 11 2024 Apple M4 (9 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU, 256 GB NVMe
 
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, HiSilicon Maleoon 910, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Average Apple M4 (10 cores)
 
Average of class Tablet

Apple M4 的集成 GPU 无疑是同类产品中最好的之一。它不仅毫不费力地粉碎了甚至是 Adreno 740Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 的 Adreno 740，而且 M4 的图形处理性能也比 iPad Air 13's M2 芯片.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Steel Nomad Light Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
8889 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
6316 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3489 Points -61%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3088 Points -65%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1030 Points -88%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
616 Points -93%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
8689 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
6406 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3563 Points -59%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3421 Points -61%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1051 Points -88%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
623 Points -93%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
32525 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
23597 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14789 Points -55%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12952 Points -60%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3785 Points -88%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2236 Points -93%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
15576 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
7806 Points -50%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4887 Points -69%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
14922 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
8084 Points -46%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4876 Points -67%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
3583 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
2532 Points -29%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
237 Points -93%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
3737 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
2217 Points -41%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
235 Points -94%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
144 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
120 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
51 fps -57%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
758.2 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
708 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
421 fps -44%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
397 fps -48%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
270 fps -64%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
100 fps -87%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps -12%
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -56%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -75%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
530 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
489.4 fps -8%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
249 fps -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
226 fps -57%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps -76%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
65 fps -88%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
106.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps -28%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps -35%
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -44%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -69%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -84%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
399.5 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
324 fps -19%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
169 fps -58%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -75%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps -89%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
84.1 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48 fps -43%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps -50%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17 fps -80%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -88%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
283.9 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
198.1 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
112 fps -61%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps -63%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -85%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -91%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
60 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
58 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39 fps -35%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps -42%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps -77%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.9 fps -88%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
114.5 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
97.4 fps -15%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49 fps -57%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps -82%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -90%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
99.8 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -40%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps -47%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -77%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -88%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
339.7 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
243.1 fps -28%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
146 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -65%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -83%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -91%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
55.1 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
42.8 fps -22%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26 fps -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -56%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8.8 fps -84%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps -91%

Apple iPad Pro 13 (2024) 的网页浏览体验流畅而迅捷。浏览器基准测试似乎证实了这一点，因为这款平板电脑在每项测试中都名列前茅。

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Apple M4 (10 cores) (334 - 357, n=3)
349 Points +5%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
333.7 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 (Safari 17)
254.587 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)
192.313 Points -42%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
176.366 Points -47%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)
111.2 Points -67%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)
108.8 Points -67%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
91.258 Points -73%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Apple M4 (10 cores) (315 - 334, n=3)
327 Points +4%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
315 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 (Safari 17)
246 Points -22%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
167 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)
151 Points -52%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)
107 Points -66%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)
106.9 Points -66%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
99 Points -69%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average Apple M4 (10 cores) (572 - 791, n=3)
712 runs/min +24%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
572 runs/min
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 (Safari 17)
445 runs/min -22%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
225 runs/min -61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)
191 runs/min -67%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)
121.9 runs/min -79%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)
99.8 runs/min -83%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
67.9 runs/min -88%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average Apple M4 (10 cores) (32 - 48.3, n=3)
42.1 runs/min +32%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
32 runs/min
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 (Safari 17)
25.7 runs/min -20%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=26, last 2 years)
13.1 runs/min -59%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
12.2 runs/min -62%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)
6.37 runs/min -80%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Apple M4 (10 cores) (105178 - 113823, n=3)
109939 Points +5%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
105178 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 (Safari 17)
78736 Points -25%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
64638 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)
62837 Points -40%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)
34656 Points -67%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
33982 Points -68%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)
29371 Points -72%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)
3734 ms * -1071%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)
1263.6 ms * -296%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
1202.4 ms * -277%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)
634.3 ms * -99%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
602 ms * -89%
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 (Safari 17)
441.7 ms * -39%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
318.8 ms *
Average Apple M4 (10 cores) (262 - 319, n=3)
282 ms * +12%

* ... smaller is better

在 iPad Pro 13 上以高达 120 帧/秒的速度尽情享受游戏乐趣

Apple iPad Pro 13 (2024) 在最高图形设置下以高达 120 帧/秒的速度运行游戏毫无问题。 AppleM4 SoC在任何时候都没有被逼到极限。不过，在我们使用GameBench 进行测试时的测试中，我们发现支持 120 帧/秒的游戏并不能始终以最大刷新率运行。相反，系统会根据需要动态调整刷新率。

除此之外，iPad Pro 13 始终能达到预期的帧率。只有在启用高清设置时，《PUBG Mobile》才能以最高 40 帧/秒的速度运行，而不是通常的 60 帧/秒。另一方面，在最低设置下也能以 120 帧/秒的速度运行。

iPad 不仅性能出众，还拥有出色的音效和充足的屏幕空间。

暗黑破坏神不朽
暗黑破坏神不朽
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø80.9 (58-118)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 4.7.0: Ø79.8 (59-120)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø76.5 (60-95)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.2.0: Ø80.5 (60-119)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.2.0: Ø38.2 (29-40)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.2.0: Ø38.2 (30-40)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024; Diablo Immortal; 3.0.0: Ø58.3 (43-60)

排放 - 四个扬声器发出美妙的声音

温度

Apple iPad Pro 13 的表面温度始终保持在可接受的范围内。即使在长时间负载的情况下，平板电脑的触感也只是在某些地方发热。

考虑到该设备在如此纤薄的机身中装载了如此大的能量，这不禁让人怀疑Apple 的散热系统设计得有多好。在 3DMark 压力测试中，很早就出现了性能下降。虽然这在日常使用中可能并不重要，因为 iPad 在最后一次运行后的性能要高于冷却后的性能。 骁龙 8 代 3的性能还要高。普通的 3DMark Wild Life 并没有给 iPad Pro 带来足够的压力，导致该设备在整个测试过程中都达到了 60 fps 的最高帧率。

Max. Load
 30 °C34.3 °C31.9 °C 
 31.3 °C36.7 °C34.7 °C 
 29.7 °C30.7 °C30.7 °C 
Maximum: 36.7 °C
Average: 32.2 °C
31.7 °C34.8 °C33.3 °C
32.9 °C35.7 °C33 °C
31.3 °C32.1 °C30.2 °C
Maximum: 35.7 °C
Average: 32.8 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test

05101520253035404550Tooltip
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash: Ø37.5 (34.3-51.6)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.4 (18.2-23.4)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; 1.1.4.1: Ø18 (17.9-19.5)
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.3 (23.7-37)
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.74 (3.73-3.75)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.29 (6.28-6.32)

3DMark Solar Bay & Steel Nomad Stress Tests

05101520253035404550Tooltip
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø38.8 (36.3-50.9)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø14 (14-14)
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.5 (15.7-21.2)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø20.4 (18.9-27.8)
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.3 (12.6-18.5)

3DMark Stress Tests

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
99.5 (3.73min - 3.75max) % +50%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
99.3 (6.28min - 6.32max) % +49%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
91.3 (17.9min - 19.5max) % +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
77.6 (18.2min - 23.4max) % +17%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
66.5 (34.3min - 51.6max) %
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
64 (23.7min - 37max) % -4%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
99.8 (14min - 14max) % +40%
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
74 (15.7min - 21.2max) % +4%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
71.3 (36.3min - 50.9max) %
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
100 (60min - 60max) %
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
99.8 (59.9min - 60max) % 0%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
99.5 (12.9min - 13max) % 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
99.1 (23.4min - 23.6max) % -1%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
91.9 (63.3min - 68.9max) % -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
74.7 (56.7min - 76max) % -25%

Legend

 
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU, 1 TB NAND Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
 
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
 
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, HiSilicon Maleoon 910, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

发言人

iPad Pro 13 的四个扬声器具有出色的音场，在中等音量下就能发出包括真实低音在内的美妙音效。不过，将音量开到最大会使扬声器的声音变得更加低沉，并导致平板电脑剧烈震动。

你可以通过 USB-C 接口或蓝牙无线连接外部音频设备到 iPad Pro，但这款平板电脑仍然不支持高分辨率编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.244.42531.841.23118.2364023.433.35032.437.16319.429.68018.839.810017.653.912513.862.716015.967.5200166525016.466.631515.169.940013.871.350012.977.163013.878.580013.576.7100013.176125013.874.3160012.576.420001372.7250013.271.4315014.567.7400013.464.750001465.9630015.270.980001569.51000013.664.4125001760.11600015.555.4SPL2685.3N0.767.1median 13.8median 69.5Delta14.33339.130.938.919.426.927.329.13736.526.934.91944.318.446.31556.616.165.515.965.414.268.612.171.91470.214.774.21572.413.773.914.175.413.674.713.17212.870.213.370.113.475.713.880.81479.514.175.413.576.313.77213.661.313.162.82687.70.777.5median 13.8median 720.74.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPad Pro 13 2024Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 -Apple iPad Pro 充电功率高达 45 瓦

耗电量

尽管 iPad Pro 13 拥有超大显示屏，但其耗电量却相当低。相比之下，虽然 三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra的显示屏在手动模式下的亮度（360 cd/m²）不如Apple 平板电脑的显示屏（569 cd/m²）。

iPad Pro 13 可通过电缆以高达 45 瓦（USB-PD）的功率充电。在测试中，我们使用了一台 MacBook Pro 14 的 65 瓦电源。 MacBook Pro 14因为没有随附充电器。Apple 平板电脑在 140 分钟内充满电，30 分钟后电池电量达到 32%，一小时后达到 62%，90 分钟后达到 82%，两小时后达到 95%。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.26 / 0.16 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.94 / 5.02 / 5.05 Watt
Load midlight 8.71 / 16.93 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
10209 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
11200 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
10000 mAh		Apple iPad Air 13 2024
 mAh		Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
5050 mAh
Power Consumption
-18%
-22%
-39%
-40%
Idle Minimum *
1.94
3.17
-63%
1.22
37%
2.23
-15%
3.58
-85%
Idle Average *
5.02
3.68
27%
7.18
-43%
8.45
-68%
7.67
-53%
Idle Maximum *
5.05
3.91
23%
8.22
-63%
8.53
-69%
7.77
-54%
Load Average *
8.71
15.83
-82%
13.63
-56%
12.52
-44%
11.86
-36%
Load Maximum *
16.93
15.84
6%
14.56
14%
16.76
1%
11.88
30%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 (10 cores): Ø6.82 (2.9-16.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy: Ø9.63 (3.89-15.7)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 (10 cores); 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø16.8 (15.8-16.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13.2 (8.89-14.4)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 (10 cores); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.68 (2.58-2.79)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.63 (3.57-3.74)

电池寿命

虽然 iPad Pro 13 (2024) 在续航时间方面没有打破任何记录，但它在我们的电池续航时间测试中始终保持了良好甚至优秀的成绩。

特别是在 Wi-Fi 网页浏览测试中，在显示屏亮度设置为 150 cd/m² 的情况下，该设备仍有一些改进的余地，其性能超过了 小米平板 6S Pro.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
30h 14min
WiFi Websurfing (Safari Mobile 17.5)
12h 32min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Safari Mobile 17.5)
7h 56min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 34min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 26min
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
10209 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
11200 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
10000 mAh		Apple iPad Air 13 2024
 mAh		Lenovo Tab P12 Paper
10200 mAh		Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
5050 mAh
Battery Runtime
-21%
1%
-16%
-8%
-14%
Reader / Idle
1814
1043
-43%
2565
41%
1519
-16%
H.264
1174
704
-40%
773
-34%
783
-33%
WiFi v1.3
752
623
-17%
959
28%
771
3%
692
-8%
647
-14%
Load
326
376
15%
224
-31%
272
-17%

Pros

+ 速度极快的 M4
+ 极其轻薄
+ 超长电池续航时间
+ 明亮准确的显示屏
+ 出色的扬声器

Cons

- 无 IP 认证
- 不适合多用户使用轻微的
- 轻微的 PWM 闪烁
- 保修期仅为 12 个月

评语：史上最快的 iPad

Apple iPad Pro 13 (2024) 评测。评测机由 notebooksbilliger.de 慷慨提供。
Apple iPad Pro 13 (2024) 评测。评测机由 notebooksbilliger.de 慷慨提供。

Apple iPad Pro 13 并没有太多值得抱怨的地方。在评测过程中，其快如闪电的 M4 处理器出色的电池续航时间、明亮准确的显示屏和活泼的扬声器给我们留下了深刻印象。你还可以为该设备配置可选的 5G 模块或哑光显示屏，并添加键盘和Apple pencil。

Apple iPad Pro 13 是一款纤薄、轻巧、快速的平板电脑，拥有强大的硬件。

不过，iPad Pro 仍不能真正取代 MacBook。iPadOS 的局限性对于许多应用来说太大了。相反，Apple ，这款平板电脑更像是针对创意人士的额外工具，也可以只作为娱乐设备使用。不用说，对于后一种使用情况来说，这款平板电脑的价格非常昂贵，尤其是考虑到存储升级的因素。

如果只是想购买大尺寸平板电脑，还可以考虑 14.6 英寸的 Galaxy 平板电脑或 12.4 英寸 Tab S9+这两款平板电脑都具有防水功能，并在包装盒中附带一支触控笔。官方定价 700 欧元（约合 760 美元）的 12.4 英寸 小米平板 6S Pro的性价比确实无与伦比。在Apple 生态系统中，iPad Air 13 是配备无闪烁 IPS 面板的更实惠的选择。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

iPad Pro 13 (2024) 可直接从Apple 或亚马逊等在线零售商处购买。基本型号的起价为1,199 欧元（约合 919 美元）。

德国的读者也可以从notebooksbilliger.de 购买这款平板电脑。该公司友好地为我们提供了评测机。

注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请点击https://www.notebookcheck.net/Our-new-rating-system-v8-explained-Lower-but-more-realistic-scores-together-with-sustainability-assessment.853123.0.html.

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 - 07/12/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
87 / 98 → 89%
Keyboard
70 / 80 → 88%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
60 / 69 → 87%
Weight
82 / 40-88 → 87%
Battery
89%
Display
93%
Games Performance
48 / 65 → 74%
Application Performance
93 / 92 → 100%
AI Performance
91%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
81 / 91 → 89%
Camera
69 / 90 → 77%
Average
81%
89%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
81.2%
Materials
80%
Packaging
95%
Power Use
91.9%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
83.5%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 78.6%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Apple iPad Pro 13 (2024) 评测--几乎只能用 "超级 "来形容的平板电脑
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-07-17 (Update: 2024-08-15)