华硕Zenbook Pro 14 Duo在审查。具有快速120赫兹OLED显示屏的双屏笔记本电脑
通过新的Zenbook Pro 14 Duo,华硕推出了一款具有两个屏幕的强大多媒体笔记本电脑。我们已经熟悉了老款的基本概念。 禅书双核14 UX482,但新的Pro 14 Duo具有一些重要的变化,总的来说,用户可以特别期待更多的性能。虽然前代产品仍然配备了英特尔Tiger Lake U处理器,但华硕现在使用的是新的Alder Lake一代更快的H45 CPU。一个专门的NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Ti也可选择使用。主显示屏是一个14.5英寸的4K OLED屏幕,第二个屏幕使用IPS面板;它们都以120赫兹的速度运行。
我们的评测单元采用UX8402Z型号,使用酷睿i7-12700H,结合16GB LPDDR5内存和512GB PCIe 4.0固态硬盘。然而,我们的设备必须没有专用的GeForce GPU;图形计算完全由处理器的集成式 Iris Xe Graphics G7.我们的配置价格约为1,899欧元(约合2,033美元),而配备RTX 3050 Ti和1TB SSD的型号价格为2,299欧元(约合2,462美元)。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.4 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 19.6 mm | 14.50" | 2880x1800 | |
89 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 19 mm | 14.40" | 2400x1600 | |
92.7 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" | 3024x1964 | |
90.6 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.25 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2400 | |
85.1 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 带有新铰链机制的Zenbook
相较于 笔记本双核14,华硕已经完全重新设计了外壳和提升第二块屏幕的铰链机制。这是一个全金属外壳,采用科技黑颜色的变体,整个外壳设计整体上相当谨慎。显示屏盖上有微妙的华硕新标志,同心圆图案仍然存在,但你必须仔细观察才能注意到它。根据华硕的说法,还有一个防污涂层,但你还是应该不时地擦拭盖子。
新的铰链机制给人留下了整体稳定的印象。只要你打开盖子,副显示屏也会升起。虽然这两根支撑杆看起来相当脆弱,但它们的工作做得相当好。主显示屏本身是通过两个铰链连接到ScreenPad上的,而不是直接连接到底座上的。这有助于华硕确保两个屏幕之间始终有一个干净的过渡,但铰链的稳定性并不令人满意,因为当你改变打开角度(最大约145-150度)时,主屏幕会明显晃动。不过,屏幕盖子本身非常稳定,即使是局部的压力也不会导致图像失真。这也适用于基本单元,而且键盘在打字时也不会弯曲。
说到占地面积,我们的对比设备几乎没有差别,但额外的屏幕也影响到建筑高度和重量。然而,这里也没有大的差别。在运输设备时,你仍然要考虑到420克的电源适配器。
连接性 - 带有Thunderbolt和USB-A的Zenbook
Zenbook Pro 14 Duo的端口分布在两边以及背面。USB端口都位于右侧,也相当在中间,这在每种情况下都不是很理想。专用电源接口、微型SD读卡器和HDMI输出都在背面。由于特殊的机制,在打开设备时,屏幕也被抬高了一些,所以背面的端口总是可以使用。
iGPU版本最多允许连接三个外部显示器,但只有在Zenbook的第二个屏幕被禁用的情况下。使用两个内置屏幕将外部显示器的数量限制为两个。
SD卡阅读器
背面的microSD读卡器使用了一个弹簧机制,能够完全容纳存储卡。使用我们的参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60),我们确定平均传输速率约为80 MB/s,与旧型号相比,这是一个实质性的增长。 旧型号.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry (AV PRO V60) | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB) |
沟通
用户将不得不没有以太网模块(但可以通过TB4适配器实现),但作为回报,英特尔内置的AX211E是最现代的WLAN模块之一。我们能够连接到华硕的参考路由器(GT-AXE11000)提供的6GHz网络(Wi-Fi 6E),没有任何问题,超过1.6GHz的传输速率非常高,也非常稳定。与更常见的Wi-Fi 6和Wi-Fi 5网络的连接也没有出现任何不正常情况。
网络摄像头
华硕仍然在屏幕的上边框使用了一个720p的网络摄像头。该摄像头完成了它的工作,但照片不是特别清晰,这里的东西当然可以做得更好。
维护
底部机箱盖用几颗Torx螺丝(T5)固定,可以拆卸。然而,维护工作仅限于清洁风扇和M.2 2280固态硬盘,后者可以被替换。
输入设备 - 无掌托的Zenbook
键盘
由于增加了显示屏,键盘被完全移到了前面,这就是为什么根本没有掌托。如果你有足够的空间(例如在办公桌上),这可以发挥作用,但如果不是这样的话,很快就会变得不舒服。此外,右侧的按键有点拥挤(只有一个单行回车键),特别是方向键非常小。这是一个遗憾,因为键盘本身提供了非常舒适的打字体验,加上其1.4毫米的键程,绝对适合长时间打字。白色背光可以分三档调节,还可以通过环境光传感器自动激活/关闭,效果很好,非常实用。
触摸板和触摸屏
触摸板已经移到了键盘的右边,在纵向模式下需要做一些妥协。滑动性能非常好,我们所有的输入都能顺利实现。然而,小的表面(5.3 x 7.8厘米)经常迫使你重新定位你的手指,即使是简单的指针移动。此外,仅由于空间有限,涉及两个以上手指的手势就非常困难。两个专用的鼠标按钮位于触摸板的下方(没有ClickPad),其行程相对较长,不会发出如此响亮的点击声。
当然,两个电容式触摸屏也可用于输入,我们在此没有任何批评,因为它们工作得非常好。据华硕称,还支持手写笔输入,但我们的评测样品没有配备。
显示屏 - Zenbook采用120赫兹OLED显示屏
首先,我们来看看主显示屏,华硕选择了一块14.5英寸的2.8K OLED面板。16:10的面板上分布着2880x1,800像素(234DPI),主观的图像质量非常好。图像和内容看起来非常生动和详细,运动中的图像印象也得益于高刷新率(120赫兹),不过你首先要手动激活。
华硕规定亮度最高为550cd/m²(也可以通过传感器自动调整),但你必须在这里区分SDR和HDR内容。在正常使用中,最大亮度 "只有 "360 cd/m²左右。这听起来并不多,但OLED面板的极高对比度在一定程度上弥补了这一点。只要你在设置中启用HDR并观看正确的内容,你还可以享受高达580 cd/m²的亮度值,我们能够在一个小的白色屏幕部分进行测量。在几乎完全白色的图像中,大约460cd/m²的亮度仍然是可能的。这些比率与目前笔记本电脑中的大多数OLED面板相当。然而,经常使用HDR内容的用户应该看一下 MacBook Pro 14它有一个迷你LED面板,可以自动检测HDR内容,并因此实现了超过1500cd/m²的亮度值。与Apple ,Zenbook的色温也可以通过传感器根据环境光线自动调整。在OLED显示器中没有屏幕出血现象。
|
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 356 cd/m²
Contrast: 17800:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA ATNA45AF01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5" | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti LQ144P1JX01, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.4" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P LEN140WQUXGA, OLED, 3840x2400, 14" | Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -13% | -1% | 0% | -20% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 80.6 -19% | 99.3 -1% | 98.7 -1% | 69 -31% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.9 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.1 -1% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.4 | 78.5 -19% | 98.5 1% | 71 -27% | |
Response Times | -417% | 728% | -11% | -2034% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.4 ? | 58.4 ? -2333% | 58.4 ? -2333% | 2.8 ? -17% | 56.4 ? -2250% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2.4 ? | 24 ? -900% | 40.4 ? -1583% | 2.8 ? -17% | 46 ? -1817% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 5000 ? 1983% | 14880 6100% | 239.2 ? 0% | |
Screen | -134% | 60% | 250% | -139% | |
Brightness middle | 356 | 497 40% | 489 37% | 361 1% | 361.8 2% |
Brightness | 357 | 491 38% | 479 34% | 362 1% | 351 -2% |
Brightness Distribution | 99 | 92 -7% | 94 -5% | 98 -1% | 90 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.02 | 0.29 -1350% | 0.01 50% | 0.001 95% | 0.28 -1300% |
Contrast | 17800 | 1714 -90% | 48900 175% | 361000 1928% | 1292 -93% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 1.2 54% | 0.8 69% | 2.8 -8% | 1.44 45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.5 | 2.8 38% | 1.3 71% | 5.8 -29% | 3.3 27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2 | 0.8 60% | 1.24 38% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 1.9 14% | 1.1 50% | 1.9 14% | 1.3 41% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.16 102% | 2.15 102% |
CCT | 6246 104% | 6821 95% | 6181 105% | 6411 101% | |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 64.9 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.3 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -188% /
-166% | 262% /
222% | 80% /
141% | -731% /
-384% |
* ... smaller is better
我们用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)分析了该面板,并在MyAsus应用程序中使用了Native预设(也对应于Display P3配置文件),但你也可以选择切换到sRGB。开箱后,性能已经非常好,只有少数孤立的颜色超过了重要的DeltaE 2000偏差3(与DCI-P3参考相比)。通过我们自己的校准(配置文件可在上面免费下载),我们可以进一步提高再现的质量。只有在100%的红色下,才会有略微升高的偏差。尽管如此,Zenbook Pro 14 Duo还是适用于图像编辑,P3色彩空间也被完全覆盖。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise | |
↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise | |
↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
我们必须更详细地讨论一下OLED显示器中的PWM主题。原则上,我们可以确定在所有亮度值中都有240赫兹的闪烁。然而,所谓的直流调光是在100%-60%的亮度范围内使用的,这对眼睛的问题要小得多。只要亮度降到60%以下,华硕就建议用户在眼睛疲劳的情况下休息一下。然而,制造商还在MyAsus应用程序中提供了另一种选择,制造商称之为 "无闪烁OLED调光"。OLED的调光水平可以在那里逐步调整(不过功耗保持不变),而且仍然使用直流调光。这很有意义,对于那些对OLED闪烁特别敏感的用户来说,这是一个不错的选择。
自然,光泽的OLED触摸屏在户外使用时有反射的问题。然而,高对比度仍然有帮助,只要你能避免直接的光源/反射,你应该仍然能够正常看到屏幕内容。OLED显示屏的视角稳定性也没有受到影响,但从某些角度看,你会得到熟悉的轻微蓝色色调。
ScreenPad Plus - 在120赫兹下运行的哑光IPS面板
现在我们来看看键盘上方的附加显示屏。这是一个无光泽的IPS触摸屏,分辨率为2880x864像素。不过,从主观上看,图像质量极差,让人想起10年前的哑光触摸屏。我们已经很久没有看到这样的颗粒状显示屏了(另见亚像素图片)。除了一些缩放问题(窗口大小总是改变),使用第二个显示器(有一个拖动窗口的按钮,但你也可以简单地用鼠标拖动窗口到第二个显示器上)效果相当好,我们可以看到第二个显示器如何根据工作流程真正有意义,但由于颗粒状的图像印象,使用起来并不完全令人愉快。
这是一个耻辱,因为它实际上是一个相当好的显示器,没有PWM,有快速的响应时间(也是120赫兹),甚至在我们的CalMAN分析中也有不错的表现。第二台显示器的最大亮度为600cd/m²,在HDR模式下甚至比OLED显示器更亮一些。
|
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 605 cd/m²
Contrast: 1315:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.2
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise | |
↘ 9.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise | |
↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 华硕选择了英特尔的45瓦CPU
测试条件
在MyAsus应用程序中,有三种不同的电源设置。低声模式、标准和性能,其中性能仅在插入时可用。这些模式既影响性能,也影响风扇音量。我们在下面的表格中列出了三种模式对应的TDP值。
MyAsus模式 | PL2 | PL1 | 最大风扇音量 |
---|---|---|---|
低音模式 | 60瓦 | 35瓦 | 29.2 dB(A) |
标准模式 | 80 瓦 | 60 -> 55 瓦 | 41.7 dB(A) |
性能模式 | 80 瓦 | 70 -> 62 瓦 | 48.8 dB(A) |
性能模式只影响CPU的多核性能。然而,与标准模式相比,优势不是很大,而且风扇的声音明显变大,这就是为什么我们也主要使用标准预设(华硕推荐的能源配置文件,Windows性能模式:最佳性能)进行测量和基准测试。这种行为在有专用RTX 3050 Ti的配置中可能有所不同。
处理器 - 酷睿i7-12700H
ǞǞǞ 英特尔酷睿i7-12700H是最新的Alder Lake H45代的一部分,它基于6个快速性能核心(最高4.7 GHz)和8个效率核心(最高3.5 GHz)的混合架构。从技术上讲,这是一个45瓦的处理器,但我们在其他测试中看到,酷睿i7在负载下可以消耗超过120瓦的功率。在80/60瓦的功率限制下,Zenbook Pro 14 Duo仍处于良好状态,它取得了持续良好的基准测试结果。特别是与旧的禅宗14双核与它的 ULV处理器,性能得到了显著提高。
Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test
我们注意到在标准模式下的Cinebench循环中有一个有趣的(可重复的)行为,在第一次运行后,性能会短暂下降一点,直到风扇启动。在性能模式下,多核性能高出约7%,但风扇的声音也明显变大。
该处理器在电池供电时最大可消耗46瓦特。这对单核性能没有影响,但多核性能约降低23%。其他CPU基准测试可在 这里.
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry -8! | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA -2! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4032 - 19330, n=63) | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=102, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (778 - 1826, n=62) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1576 - 7407, n=63) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (300 - 704, n=63) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1379 - 2916, n=69) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (113 - 263, n=64) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (168 - 732, n=62) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (22844 - 73067, n=62) | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2743 - 5972, n=62) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (5144 - 13745, n=63) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (803 - 1851, n=63) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4.67 - 21.8, n=63) | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (34.2 - 95.3, n=62) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (0.4441 - 1.052, n=62) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2585 - 17957, n=62) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12439 - 90760, n=62) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (833 - 4242, n=62) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (57923 - 103202, n=62) | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (3249 - 9939, n=62) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (7135 - 44760, n=62) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (31839 - 144360, n=62) | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (305 - 1171, n=62) | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1437 - 9692, n=62) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12863 - 52207, n=62) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P |
系统性能
尽管缺乏专用的GeForce GPU,但Zenbook Pro 14 Duo在合成生产力基准测试(PCMark、CrossMark)中的表现非常好,这也被我们的主观印象所证实。在日常使用中,Zenbook的响应速度非常快,而且系统处理第二块显示屏也没有问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5541 - 6281, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10569 - 11699, n=7) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6690 - 8038, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6207 - 7401, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1492 - 1907, n=7) | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1499 - 1832, n=7) | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1507 - 2016, n=7) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1384 - 1831, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry |
PCMark 10 Score | 5948 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25615 - 80511, n=62) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25586 - 79442, n=62) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (23679 - 88660, n=62) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (76.2 - 133.9, n=60) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试中,使用目前的BIOS版本,Zenbook没有显示出任何重大问题,在播放视频时也没有跳帧(掉帧),但有一个驱动程序引起了一点麻烦(ACPI驱动程序)。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti | |
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA |
* ... smaller is better
储存
华硕安装了一块来自三星的快速PCIe 4.0固态硬盘(PM9A1),存储容量为512GB,其中约430GB在首次启动后可用。该固态硬盘在基准测试中的表现略低于预期,在连续加载时也可以观察到轻微的性能下降。这在日常使用中并无影响,但三星固态硬盘无法发挥其全部潜力。其原因可能是温度问题,因为硬盘被放在离处理器和机箱内的热管很近的地方。更多的固态硬盘基准测试可以在我们的 硬盘/SSD基准测试文章.
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
正如我们之前提到的,我们对Zenbook Pro 14 Duo的评测配置并没有专门的显卡。相反,处理器的iGPU处理这一任务。与旧的Tiger Lake H45 CPU不同,它们仍然配备了较慢的 UHD Graphics,新的Alder Lake型号配备的是Iris Xe Graphics G7与96个EUs,由于Tiger Lake ULV处理器,我们已经熟悉这项技术有一段时间了。该iGPU非常适用于日常任务和高分辨率视频播放。根据所使用的编解码器,也可以进行视频编辑,但想不时玩游戏的用户肯定应该选择带有 RTX 3050 Ti.有了Iris Xe,你必须专注于要求较低或较老的游戏,但你仍然要经常降低细节水平。即使在长时间的负载和电池供电的情况下,无论是在性能模式还是使用标准预设,性能都很稳定。其他GPU基准测试列在 这里.
华硕表示,Zenbook Pro 14 Duo能够冷却总功率为85瓦,因此我们假设这将是一个40或50瓦的版本的 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti.为了了解使用可选的dGPU时的性能,你可以从 Surface Laptop Studio的提示,它使用50瓦的RTX 3050 Ti版本。
3DMark 11 Performance | 7917 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 26837 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5675 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2095 points | |
Help |
The Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 130.8 | 115.6 | 26.9 | 11.2 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 109 | 68 | 37 | 16.1 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 134.3 | 99.8 | 75.5 | 68.9 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 51.4 | 27.8 | 27.8 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 68.3 | 49.4 | 43.5 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 67 | 29 | 27 | 25 | 18 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 102.4 | 48.3 | 38.1 | 30.8 | |
F1 2021 (2021) | 115.7 | 59.5 | 47.3 | 32.5 | |
Farming Simulator 22 (2021) | 103 | 48 | 34 | 28 |
排放 - Zenbook Pro以良好的声音给人留下深刻印象
下面的结果只适用于没有专用GPU的版本。根据华硕的说法,冷却系统可以处理85瓦的总功率,我们相信这将导致风扇的噪音和温度高于我们的审查单位。
噪声排放
在简单的任务和日常使用中,Zenbook Pro 14 Duo的两个风扇通常完全不活动,即使是短时的负载高峰,通常也不使用风扇就能克服。在游戏时,我们能够测量到约38 dB(A)的负载,而在压力测试中记录的数据略低于42 dB(A)。只有在绝对必要的情况下,我们才会推荐可选的性能模式,因为它的声音会大得多,最大可达48.8分贝(A)。建议在非常安静的环境中使用 "低声模式"。它名副其实,最大噪音水平为29.2 dB(A),但性能自然会降低。我们无法检测到任何其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.7 / 23.7 / 23.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 37.6 / 41.7 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.7 dB(A) |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512 | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -5% | 2% | -5% | -5% | |
off / environment * | 23.7 | 24.7 -4% | 24.8 -5% | 24.1 -2% | 26.3 -11% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.7 | 24.7 -4% | 24.8 -5% | 24.1 -2% | 26.5 -12% |
Idle Average * | 23.7 | 24.7 -4% | 24.8 -5% | 24.1 -2% | 26.5 -12% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.7 | 24.7 -4% | 24.8 -5% | 30 -27% | 26.5 -12% |
Load Average * | 37.6 | 33.2 12% | 27.8 26% | 39.4 -5% | 26.7 29% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.6 | 44.5 -18% | 27.8 26% | 39.4 -5% | 40.7 -8% |
Load Maximum * | 41.7 | 46.7 -12% | 49.5 -19% | 39.4 6% | 45.6 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
华硕利用第二个显示屏下面的额外空间进行散热,因为这里可以非常容易地吸进新鲜空气,然后通过两边再次输送到机箱外。然而,在负载情况下,在键盘和ScreenPad的交界处有一个明显的热点,即在F4-F6键的区域,在打字时也能明显感觉到。在压力测试中,底部也明显发热,超过47°C(约117°F),将设备放在腿上长期使用会感到不舒服,但这里基本上没有性能限制。在日常使用中,机箱保持更低的温度,但底部的表面温度也相对较高,略高于30°C(约86°F)。
在结合CPU/GPU负载的压力测试中,处理器很快就能达到45-50瓦的消耗。在这种情况下,显卡仍然以~1.1 GHz的时钟速率运行,而处理器的时钟速率约为1.7-1.8 GHz。压力测试后,性能没有直接下降。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-8.4 °C / -15.2 F).
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 16% | 11% | -1% | -9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43.2 | 42.3 2% | 46.8 -8% | 47.5 -10% | 37.2 14% |
Maximum Bottom * | 47.8 | 38.2 20% | 40.9 14% | 52.2 -9% | 56.6 -18% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 23.4 16% | 24.2 14% | 27.1 3% | 31.4 -12% |
Idle Bottom * | 32.2 | 23.5 27% | 24.2 25% | 28.5 11% | 38.2 -19% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个立体声扬声器位于基座单元的前面,它们将声音向下和斜向投射到侧面。在预装的Dolby Access应用程序中,有几个配置文件可用,也可以选择保存自己的配置文件与均衡器设置。虽然这两个模块不是市场上最响亮的,但它们的音质非常好,播放音乐和电影是完全愉快的。当然,你可以用自己的低音炮来改善,但Zenbook绝对不需要在这里避开它的对手。
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--两个显示器耗费电池寿命
能源消耗
在下表中的测量中,第二个显示屏被停用了。根据亮度的不同,这里可以增加3到7瓦的功率。但即使没有第二个显示器,空闲率也不是特别好,这意味着120赫兹的OLED面板需要大量的电力。我们使用120赫兹模式进行了测量,但特别是当涉及到静态屏幕内容时,更高的频率并没有太大的影响。
我们短暂地观察到负载下的功耗为111瓦,但在压力测试中很快就稳定在~66-70瓦,类似于处理器的TDP。因此,附带的150瓦电源适配器是完全足够的。
Off / Standby | 0.36 / 0.68 Watt |
Idle | 8.8 / 12.6 / 13.9 Watt |
Load |
77.5 / 111 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5" | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.4" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 3840x2400, 14" | Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 19% | 25% | 17% | 37% | 35% | 9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 8.8 | 2.6 70% | 2.9 67% | 7.1 19% | 3.6 59% | 5.34 ? 39% | 6.66 ? 24% |
Idle Average * | 12.6 | 7.1 44% | 11.6 8% | 10 21% | 9.3 26% | 8.55 ? 32% | 11.2 ? 11% |
Idle Maximum * | 13.9 | 7.9 43% | 11.9 14% | 10.8 22% | 10 28% | 10.8 ? 22% | 13.3 ? 4% |
Load Average * | 77.5 | 76.8 1% | 49.5 36% | 64 17% | 40.6 48% | 45.3 ? 42% | 70.1 ? 10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 52.4 | 83 -58% | 58.2 -11% | 47.7 9% | 44.3 15% | ||
Load Maximum * | 111 | 97.3 12% | 68.5 38% | 97 13% | 62.4 44% | 67.5 ? 39% | 116.3 ? -5% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / stress test
Energy consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
76瓦的电池不允许有特别长的电池运行时间。在我们的测试中,在150cd/m²的亮度下(相当于我们测试设备最大亮度的72%),我们观察到运行时间在6:30-7小时之间,但这只是在禁用副显示屏时才是如此。只要你在中等亮度下激活它,在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,在150cd/m²下,结果只有不到4小时。正如我们在其他评测设备上已经注意到的那样,刷新率在我们的Wi-Fi测试中没有太大的影响,因为在60赫兹和150cd/m²下,测试只多运行了14分钟(6:40小时)。
如果你想在旅途中享受全亮度的HDR视频,应该不会太长,因为这里的电池在3小时多一点(196分钟)后就用完了。
当设备打开时,充满电需要107分钟,仅30分钟后就可再次使用50%的容量(54分钟后为80%)。如果你不打算一直拖着笨重的150瓦电源适配器,Zenbook Pro 14 Duo也可以用更紧凑的USB电源适配器充电。
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 76 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 58 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, 69.9 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 22% | 67% | 39% | 97% | 56% | |
H.264 | 407 | 739 82% | 900 121% | 758 86% | 839 ? 106% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 386 | 480 24% | 816 111% | 517 34% | 505 31% | 635 ? 65% |
Load | 101 | 60 -41% | 69 -32% | 98 -3% | 265 162% | 97.6 ? -3% |
Reader / Idle | 2205 | 1168 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 第二个显示屏是Zenbook Pro 14 Duo的弱点
额外屏幕的概念仍然很有趣,当然也有一些使用案例,生产力明显受益于额外的显示屏。尽管如此,它仍然是一个小众产品,尽管华硕已经能够在某些方面改进Zenbook Pro 14 Duo(例如CPU性能),但第二个显示屏同时也是这款14英寸笔记本电脑的最大问题。
最明显的缺点是输入设备的位置,因为没有掌托,触摸板按现代标准来说简直太小了。当两个显示器都启用时,电池寿命非常差,而且使用它们有时会有点尴尬,这主要是由于不同的缩放系数和ScreenPad的低垂直分辨率分别造成的。然而,最大的问题是主观的图像质量不佳。虽然测量结果一直很好,但无光泽的IPS显示屏简直是颗粒感极强,当你在几厘米外有出色的OLED显示屏时,在上面观看内容并不是特别令人愉快。
该显示屏以其熟悉的良好性能给人留下深刻印象,我们特别想强调这里的调光软件功能,它允许华硕绕过PWM闪烁的恼人之处。一个对话框告诉用户,直流调光只在60%及以上的亮度水平上起作用;PWM闪烁会在较低的亮度水平上启动,并可能导致不利影响。使用软件来降低亮度是比较复杂的,但这是值得的。
更高的生产力和大量的CPU功率。由于改用新的Alder Lake H处理器,Zenbook Pro 14 Duo提供了大量的处理能力,额外的显示屏可以根据预期的用途大大增加生产力,但ScreenPad的主观图像质量较差,有损整体印象。
配置上,可选 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti对许多用户来说肯定会更感兴趣。就价格而言,Zenbook Pro 14 Duo与以下产品相当 微软Surface Laptop Studio笔记本电脑,后者仍然不得不使用旧的Tiger Lake CPU。在价格方面,Zenbook Pro 14 Duo与微软Surface Laptop Studio相当。 Apple MacBook Pro 14也在这个价格范围内,但如果你经常使用HDR内容,它的迷你LED面板简直有巨大的优势。联想 联想瑜伽9i 14敞篷车也是一个有趣的选择,它的移动性也更强,同时也已经具备了最新的技术。
价格和可用性
在撰写本文时,华硕Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA在美国被列为 "即将上市"。目前你可以在B&H的网上商店找到它配备英特尔酷睿i7-12700H,32GB内存,1TB存储空间,集成Iris Xe图形,售价约为2000美元。你也可以等待该设备在亚马逊上出售。,例如。
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
- 06/05/2022 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff