华硕 TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI 笔记本电脑评测:140 瓦GeForce RTX 4070 售价 1400 美元
华硕 TUF Gaming A17 FA707 是基于英特尔的 TUF Gaming F17 FX707 的 AMD 版本。TUF 系列包括中端游戏笔记本电脑,与价格较高的高端 ROG 系列形成鲜明对比。
我们的配置是最新的 SKU,配备 Zen 4 Ryzen 9 7940HS CPU、140 WGeForce RTX 4070 GPU 和 1080p 144 Hz IPS 显示屏,零售价约为 1400 美元。该机型的其他 SKU 配备了速度较慢的 Ryzen 7 735HS、GeForce RTX 4050 或 4060,或分辨率更高的 1440p 显示器,刷新率更快,达到 240 Hz 或 360 Hz。
TUF Gaming A17 的替代产品包括其他中端游戏笔记本电脑,如 微星 Pulse 17, 惠普Pavilion Gaming 17, 联想Legion 5 系列或 宏碁 Nitro 17 系列.
更多华硕评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.6 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 25.4 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
84.1 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 25 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 27.2 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
82.1 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 25.2 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
90.1 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
82.7 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 25 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
该机箱与 TUF Gaming F17 FX707包括端口的位置以及外盖和底座分别采用的金属和塑料材料。尽管如此,外盖上还是有一些小的表面差异,有助于从视觉上区分 TUF Gaming A17 和 TUF Gaming F17。例如,F17 上的角圈现在变成了斜线。此外,盖子底部边缘还有额外的标记,而 F17 上则完全没有。如果翻转过来看,机箱底部的橡胶三角形由红色变成了橙色。
我们对基于 英特尔 F17的印象也适用于基于 AMD 的 A17。
尽管 TUF Gaming A17 的外观设计平淡无奇,但它仍比许多其他中端 17.3 英寸游戏笔记本电脑更薄、更轻,例如 惠普Pavilion Gaming 17宏碁 Nitro 17 或微星 Pulse 17 等中端 17.3 英寸游戏笔记本电脑相比,TUF Gaming A17 仍然更薄、更轻。在旅行时,这些差异足以让人注意到,因此华硕相对较小的尺寸可以成为一个明显的优势。
连接性
我们的机型保留了 F17 FX707 上的所有端口,但有一个小例外:雷电 4 端口换成了 USB-C 4。不过,大多数 Thunderbolt 设备都兼容 USB4,因此这一细微差别应该不会影响绝大多数用户。
需要注意的是,虽然系统上有两个 USB-C 端口,但只有最靠近前缘的一个与 USB-C AC 适配器兼容。例如,我们的 135 W USB-C 联想适配器可以通过一个 USB-C 端口为华硕充电,但不能通过另一个。系统还必须处于 dGPU 模式,才能支持外置 USB-C 显示器。
有趣的是,我们的外接显示器只能使用两个 USB-C 端口中的一个,尽管华硕声称两个端口都应该兼容。
交流
Realtek RTL8852BE 是 Wi-Fi 6 和蓝牙 5.3 连接的标准配置。为了节省成本,没有配置 Wi-Fi 6E 或英特尔 AX 系列。不过,我们在配对 Wi-Fi 6 网络时没有遇到任何连接问题,尽管整个过程比预期的要慢。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) |
网络摄像头
该机型集成了一个 100 万像素或 720p 网络摄像头,而大多数其他游戏笔记本电脑都已升级到 200 万像素或 1080p。虽然聊胜于无,但 TUF Gaming A17 显然不是为变焦通话而设计的。
维护
卸下 12 颗十字螺丝后,底部面板就能轻松弹出。英特尔和 AMD 版本的内部差异不大,因此用户仍可获得两个 M.2 固态硬盘插槽和两个 SODIMM 插槽。内存限制在 4800 MHz。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外,没有其他附件。如果在美国购买,通常适用一年有限保修。
输入设备
键盘
三区 RGB 键盘的键程为 1.7 毫米,比大多数超极本的键程稍深。对于一款游戏笔记本电脑来说,只要你能原谅方向键和数字键盘的拥挤,打字体验还是很不错的。
由于深灰色字体与黑色键帽反差较大,按键的可视性并不好。华硕只用白色突出显示 WASD 字母,而所有其他符号的颜色都深得多,这是一个奇怪的决定。这就迫使用户启用键盘背光,即使在明亮的环境下,或者如果电池寿命是个问题,也能更容易阅读。
触摸板
点击板的尺寸为 13 x 7.7 厘米,与 TUF Gaming F17 相同。不过,我们在这里没有发现点击板有任何问题,而英特尔版本的点击板在右下角附近有一个 "死角"。按压时的反馈效果还算不错,只是略微偏软。
显示屏
我们的 1080p AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 IPS 面板是一款入门级显示屏,可用于许多其他游戏笔记本电脑,包括 微星脉搏 17或 卡塔纳 17.它通常是最便宜和最低端的选择,其特点是较差的 ~60% sRGB 色彩再现能力和较慢的黑白响应时间。值得庆幸的是,华硕为其 FA707 系列提供了三种显示器供用户选择:
- 1920 x 1080,IPS,~60% sRGB,144 Hz
- 2560 x 1440,IPS,100% DCI-P3,240 Hz
- 2560 x 1440,IPS,100% sRGB,360 Hz
虽然没有 OLED 或迷你 LED 选项,但我们强烈推荐这两款 1440p 面板中的任何一款,因为它们在保持自适应同步和高级 Optimus 功能的同时,还能提供比基本 1080p 面板更好的色彩。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 255.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 1219:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.51 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.82
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 (AUO4B9D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI Katana 17 B13VFK B173HAN04.9, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ1 (BOE09F9), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng LGD0611, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -3% | 3% | 108% | 63% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.7 | 40.2 1% | 38.4 -3% | 40.8 3% | 97.9 147% | 64.8 63% |
sRGB Coverage | 59.1 | 59.7 1% | 57.5 -3% | 61 3% | 99.9 69% | 96.8 64% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41 | 41.5 1% | 39.7 -3% | 42.2 3% | 85.5 109% | 66.5 62% |
Response Times | -6% | 16% | 9% | 60% | 68% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39 ? | 39.2 ? -1% | 31.2 ? 20% | 33 ? 15% | 15.2 ? 61% | 12.7 ? 67% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26.9 ? | 29.6 ? -10% | 23.6 ? 12% | 26 ? 3% | 11.2 ? 58% | 8.7 ? 68% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | -10% | 0% | -9% | -18% | 16% | |
Brightness middle | 255.9 | 287 12% | 254 -1% | 267 4% | 341 33% | 328 28% |
Brightness | 248 | 268 8% | 250 1% | 256 3% | 308 24% | 317 28% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 89 -2% | 91 0% | 93 2% | 82 -10% | 94 3% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.17 19% | 0.14 33% | 0.21 -0% | 0.45 -114% | 0.23 -10% |
Contrast | 1219 | 1688 38% | 1814 49% | 1271 4% | 758 -38% | 1426 17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.51 | 5.1 -13% | 4.52 -0% | 4.7 -4% | 4.16 8% | 3.83 15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.77 | 8.72 58% | 21.22 -2% | 20.4 2% | 8.14 61% | 8.51 59% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.82 | 5.1 -180% | 4.52 -148% | 4.5 -147% | 3 -65% | 0.83 54% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 4.24 -33% | 1 69% | 1.5 53% | 5.09 -59% | 4.9 -53% |
Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.44 90% | 2.44 90% | 2.12 104% | 2.48 89% | 2.177 101% |
CCT | 6054 107% | 6008 108% | 6502 100% | 6552 99% | 6884 94% | 7881 82% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -5% /
-7% | 4% /
2% | 1% /
-4% | 50% /
20% | 49% /
33% |
* ... smaller is better
该显示器没有经过校准,其灰度和色彩 deltaE 平均值分别为 3.2 和 4.51。使用 X-Rite 色度计自行校准显示器后,平均值将分别降至 0.3 和 1.82。然而,由于上述有限的色彩空间,饱和度越高,色彩越不准确。例如,即使经过校准,蓝色的 deltaE 也高达 20.94。
我们的校准 ICM 配置文件可在上面免费下载。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.8 ms rise | |
↘ 13.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
尽管采用了哑光面板以减少眩光,但室外可视性相对较差。最大亮度仅为 250 至 300 尼特,而 MacBook Pro 16 等笔记本电脑的亮度几乎是它们的两倍。 MacBook Pro 16或竞争产品联想Legion Slim 7 16 的两倍。
性能
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将华硕 Armoury Crate 设置为 Turbo 模式和 Ultimate GPU 模式。更改 Armoury Crate 电源配置文件也会自动更改 Windows 电源配置文件。请注意,"性能模式 "不是可用的最快电源配置文件;该名称由 "加速模式 "取代。
同时,四种 GPU 模式与 MUX 和高级 Optimus 绑定如下:
- 终极模式:所有任务均使用独立 GPU。需要软重启。在内部显示器上启用 G-Sync 也需要这样做。
- 标准模式:也称为 Microsoft MSHybrid。在要求苛刻的应用程序和其他任务的 iGPU 之间自动切换。
- 环保模式:禁用独立 GPU,所有应用程序均在 iGPU 上运行。
- 优化模式:使用交流电源时,自动切换 dGPU 用于要求较高的应用,iGPU 用于其他任务。如果使用电池供电,则会自动禁用 dGPU。
处理器
... Ryzen 9 7940HS直接与普通 酷睿 i7-13700H.在单线程和多线程负载下,其原始性能与英特尔同类产品相比仅相差几个百分点。我们可以观察到没有重大的节流问题,也不像 TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z上使用的老款 12 代酷睿 i7-12700H 不同。
降级到 Ryzen 7 7735HS将影响处理器性能约 15%至 20%。Ryzen 7 对于游戏来说仍然非常快,尤其是在 GPU 几乎总是瓶颈的中端级别,但是那些希望从高刷新率面板上榨取每一帧画面的玩家应该考虑 Ryzen 9。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 -2! | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (1733 - 1832, n=10) | |
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (6277 - 7111, n=10) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (680 - 714, n=10) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (2470 - 2848, n=10) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (277 - 288, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (11207 - 12500, n=11) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (1823 - 2032, n=11) | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (20.1 - 22.6, n=9) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (36.9 - 54.8, n=10) | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (0.4159 - 0.4467, n=10) | |
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eurocom Raptor X17 | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (25226 - 29109, n=8) | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (14663 - 15551, n=8) | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (56839 - 66238, n=8) | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (866 - 1152, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (13175 - 15675, n=8) | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (29922 - 41024, n=8) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
系统性能
由于采用了快速的 Zen 4 Ryzen 7 CPU 和GeForce RTX 4070 GPU,PCMark 分数在所有搭载第 13 代酷睿 i7 处理器的游戏笔记本电脑中名列前茅。在测试过程中,我们没有遇到任何死机现象,但显示器有时会出现从睡眠状态唤醒的问题,这可能是由于 GPU 自动切换造成的。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8092 - 8205, n=2) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10896 - 10952, n=2) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9693 - 10805, n=2) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12666 - 13618, n=2) | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
CrossMark / Overall | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1797 - 1812, n=2) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1740 - 1762, n=2) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1952 - 1979, n=2) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1478 - 1575, n=2) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (317 - 319, n=2) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (260 - 271, n=2) | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (481 - 499, n=2) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 8092 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (59712 - 78739, n=8) | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (50399 - 61836, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (72541 - 91567, n=8) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (87.6 - 111.1, n=8) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签页时,LatencyMon 显示了 DPC 问题。在其他方面,以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频也非常完美,没有掉帧记录。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng | |
MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备配备了 西部数据 SN560 是一款中端 PCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘,与高端的 WDC SN850X 系列形成鲜明对比。最高传输速率约为 5000 MB/s,而不是上述 SN850X 的 7000+ MB/s。不过,对于中端游戏笔记本电脑来说,西部数据 SN560 已经绰绰有余。从下面的 DiskSpd 压力测试结果可以看出,我们的硬盘没有出现性能节流问题。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
总体图形性能比桌面版的GeForce RTX 4070 大约慢 25%至 30%。从旧版RTX 3060 笔记本电脑 升级的用户,在考虑任何支持 DLSS 的功能之前,仍然可以看到高达 50% 的性能提升。相对较高的 140 W TGP 目标值使我们的 TUF Gaming A17 的性能比我们数据库中配备相同 RTX 4070 GPU 的普通笔记本电脑高出约 5%至 15%。
降级到
RTX 4060或 RTX 4050配置将分别影响约 20% 和 35% 的性能。在 RTX 4050、RTX 4060 和 RTX 4070 选项之间跳转时,性能差距或多或少是一条直线。速度更快的 RTX 4080 或 4090 仅在华硕更高端的 ROG 型号上提供。电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
涡轮模式 | 30438 | 28504 | 14166 |
性能模式 | 29222 (-4%) | 28345 (-1%) | 13129 (-7%) |
平衡模式 | 29472 (-3%) | 27605 (-3%) | 12947 (-9%) |
电池电量 | 23884 (-22%) | 26213 (-8%) | 11027 (-22%) |
如Fire Strike 上表所示,在较慢的 "性能 "或 "平衡 "电源配置文件下运行对系统性能的影响很小。最大的影响来自使用电池供电,这在意料之中。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI -1! | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD -1! | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 -1! | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) -1! | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK -1! | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W -1! | |
Medion Erazer Scout E20 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 -1! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 -1! |
3DMark 11 Performance | 35591 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 27054 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 12853 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD -1! | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 -1! | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 -1! |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (58.6 - 115.9, n=16) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
2560x1440 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (49.8 - 79.5, n=16) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
3840x2160 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (28.3 - 39.7, n=12) |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (74.7 - 103.6, n=27) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (30.7 - 90.7, n=34) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24.8 - 57.1, n=32) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
3840x2160 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (20.2 - 24, n=10) | |
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (19.1 - 46.8, n=20) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69.8 - 133.7, n=56) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (26.5 - 83.5, n=15) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
Strange Brigade | |
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (76.3 - 234, n=61) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
2560x1440 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (52.8 - 150.9, n=53) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
3840x2160 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (42.7 - 77.9, n=17) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
X-Plane 11.11 | |
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (52.1 - 147.9, n=65) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3) | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (63.4 - 125.8, n=25) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD |
Dota 2 Reborn | |
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (89.7 - 191.2, n=63) | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
3840x2160 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (88.4 - 153.3, n=25) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 120.7 | 75.2 | ||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 161.6 | 146.4 | 138.1 | 130 | 112.2 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 121.9 | 88.9 | 49.4 | |||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 114.7 | 101.7 | 80.7 | 68.6 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 121 | 114 | 62 | |||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 214 | 139.3 | 72.6 | |||
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 109.4 | 75.6 | 35.5 | |||
F1 22 (2022) | 210 | 83.8 | 54.7 | 26.5 | ||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 114.7 | 81.1 | 41.1 | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 135.8 | 118.1 | 99.4 | 86.3 | 51.8 | 22.3 |
排放量
系统噪音
风扇噪音不仅比我们在英特尔机型上记录的噪音大,而且如果设置为 Turbo 模式,噪音也会更大。运行 Witcher 3在性能模式下运行时,风扇噪音仅为 41 dB(A),而在 Turbo 模式下则为 57 dB(A)。由于 Turbo 模式只比 Performance 模式稍快,用户可能会考虑使用 Performance 模式而不是 Turbo 模式玩游戏,因为后者的风扇噪音要小得多。否则,当游戏笔记本电脑的噪音达到 50 分贝(A)或更高时,我们一般建议使用耳机。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 28.5 / 29.8 / 29.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 34.8 / 57.3 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 27.9 dB(A) |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-11300H, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 12% | 16% | -4% | 15% | 7% | |
off / environment * | 27.9 | 24 14% | 24 14% | 24.5 12% | 23 18% | 25 10% |
Idle Minimum * | 28.5 | 24 16% | 24 16% | 24.5 14% | 23 19% | 27 5% |
Idle Average * | 29.8 | 24 19% | 24 19% | 24.5 18% | 23 23% | 28 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.8 | 24 19% | 24 19% | 40 -34% | 23 23% | 30 -1% |
Load Average * | 34.8 | 42.6 -22% | 32.49 7% | 48.3 -39% | 36.92 -6% | 39 -12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 57.1 | 46.84 18% | 46.51 19% | 56 2% | 50 12% | 44 23% |
Load Maximum * | 57.3 | 46.84 18% | 46.51 19% | 59.1 -3% | 50 13% | 46 20% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
与大多数其他游戏笔记本电脑相比,华硕笔记本电脑的表面温度较低,这主要归功于底座采用塑料材料和充足的通风栅格。例如,华硕游戏时的平均表面温度仅为 29 摄氏度,而雷蛇刀锋 17 则为 39 摄氏度。 雷蛇刀锋 17相比,Razer Blade 17 的机身厚度更薄,通风栅格更少,而且主要采用金属合金材料。华硕的发热点也更靠后,手指不容易接触到。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 22 °C / 71.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+6.9 °C / 12.4 F).
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -29% | -29% | -25% | -25% | -17% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 40 | 52 -30% | 48 -20% | 41.6 -4% | 43 -8% | 44 -10% |
Maximum Bottom * | 33.6 | 47 -40% | 50 -49% | 43.1 -28% | 44 -31% | 48 -43% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.6 | 31 -17% | 30 -13% | 32 -20% | 32 -20% | 27 -2% |
Idle Bottom * | 24.4 | 31 -27% | 33 -35% | 35.8 -47% | 34 -39% | 27 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在 Prime95 下运行时,CPU 的主频会升至 4.8 GHz,然后略有下降,并稳定在 4.5 GHz、80 W 和 82 C。
在 Turbo 模式下运行时,GPU 的核心频率将稳定在 2505 MHz,RAM 频率为 2025 MHz,功耗为 106 W。 Witcher 3而在性能模式下运行时,所有这些数值将分别降至 2325 MHz、2000 MHz 和 95 W。如上文 GPU 性能部分所述,性能模式会对图形性能造成轻微影响。请注意,尽管 Turbo 模式下的风扇上限较高,但在 Turbo 模式下,GPU 特别是 CPU 的运行温度明显升高。
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度(°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 29 | 29 |
Prime95 压力 | 4.5 | -- | 82 | 45 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 4.0 | 2370 | 76 | 70 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式) | ~1.7 | 2325 | 63 | 71 |
Witcher 3 压力(Turbo 模式) | ~1.7 | 2505 | 84 | 73 |
发言人
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
在禁用 dGPU 的节能模式下运行时,功耗可低至 6 W。如果将 dGPU 设置为最大亮度,功耗可高达 22 W,是类似条件下 TUF Gaming F17 或 Pulse 17 功耗的两倍。因此,如果电池寿命至关重要,就必须将系统设置为 iGPU 模式。
在 Turbo 模式下运行Witcher 3 时,功耗将高达 190 瓦,比 微星 Pulse 17 GeForce RTX 4070 GPU 相同。如果改用性能模式运行,耗电量将降至 150 瓦。虽然与搭载旧版 RTX 3060 的游戏笔记本电脑相比,这款笔记本电脑的要求更高,但性能提升足以弥补这一不足。
当 CPU 和 GPU 的使用率均为 100% 时,我们可以测量到中等尺寸(约 16.5 x 7.6 x 2.5 厘米)的 240 W AC 适配器的最大功耗为 248 W。由于散热限制,如下截图所示,这一速度只能持续约 30 秒。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 5.7 Watt |
Idle | 6.2 / 21.8 / 22 Watt |
Load |
59.2 / 247.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 4% | 13% | -8% | -40% | 21% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.2 | 6.6 -6% | 9 -45% | 12.2 -97% | 14.4 -132% | 3 52% |
Idle Average * | 21.8 | 8.3 62% | 10.2 53% | 14.9 32% | 20 8% | 8 63% |
Idle Maximum * | 22 | 11.8 46% | 10.8 51% | 15.8 28% | 21.5 2% | 28 -27% |
Load Average * | 59.2 | 119 -101% | 72 -22% | 85.22 -44% | 119 -101% | 88 -49% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 189.7 | 169 11% | 130 31% | 151.1 20% | 218 -15% | 98.2 48% |
Load Maximum * | 247.8 | 222 10% | 221 11% | 212.8 14% | 248 -0% | 152 39% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
尽管我们的 CPU 和 GPU 速度更快,但运行时间与 TUF Gaming F17 基本相同。尤其是 WLAN 浏览,对于一款 17.3 英寸的大型游戏笔记本电脑来说,可以持续 9 个多小时,令人印象深刻。当然,用户必须记得在 iGPU 模式下运行,才能达到如此长的运行时间。
使用随附的专有交流适配器,从空电到满电只需不到 90 分钟。使用第三方 USB-C 适配器充电会慢一些,但仍然支持。
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 82 Wh | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd2146ng i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 52.5 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 15% | 13% | -56% | -16% | -46% | |
Reader / Idle | 1180 | |||||
WiFi v1.3 | 548 | 519 -5% | 537 -2% | 176 -68% | 353 -36% | 298 -46% |
Load | 103 | 138 34% | 131 27% | 58 -44% | 108 5% | |
H.264 | 462 | 295 |
Pros
Cons
结论:性能卓越,显示效果不佳
TUF Gaming A17 FA707 是配备GeForce RTX 4070 的最便宜的 17.3 英寸游戏笔记本电脑之一。尤其令人印象深刻的是,该系统配备了 Zen 4 Ryzen 9 CPU,这意味着您不必为了低价而牺牲处理器性能。强大的 CPU 和 GPU 组合让这款机型很容易被推荐给那些希望最大限度提高性价比的玩家。
而在处理器周围,笔记本电脑的其他部分则存在偷工减料的问题。更具体地说,与更高端的游戏笔记本电脑(如 ROG 系列.值得庆幸的是,华硕为 TUF Gaming A17 提供了多种显示屏选择,其色彩和属性都比我们的评测配置要好得多。如果可能,我们建议将我们评测配置中的 Ryzen 9 CPU 和较差的 1080p 面板换成 Ryzen 7 CPU 和 1440p 面板。CPU 的运行速度可能会稍慢一些,但对显示质量的改善会更加明显,非常值得权衡利弊。
只要你能找到合适的配置,华硕 TUF Gaming A17 就能很好地平衡价格、性能和外形尺寸。采用 1080p 面板的机型色彩明显不如 1440p 机型。
其他缺点包括:Wi-Fi 6 连接(而不是 Wi-Fi 6E)、低分辨率 720p 网络摄像头以及没有按键 RGB 灯光。不过,这些缺点并不会直接影响游戏体验。该系统保留了大多数核心功能,这些功能可以说更受欢迎,如轻薄的外形、超长的电池续航时间以及可升级的内部结构。
价格和供应情况
Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI-NS94
- 01/06/2024 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.