Apple iPhone 15 Plus 评测 - 配备超大显示屏和强劲电池的 iPhone

Name: Apple iPhone 15 Plus
Brand: Apple

终于有 USB 了，但速度很慢。

iPhone 15 Plus 不仅配备了大尺寸显示屏，而且今年还首次配备了 "动态岛"。此外，还配备了分辨率更高的主摄像头、性能稍强的电池、更强的计算能力和 USB-C。所有这些，Apple ，价格比去年略低。

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/05/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Apple iPhone Smartphone Touchscreen

Apple iPhone 15 Plus 是 iPhone 14 Plus 的直接继承者。 iPhone 14 Plus和更大的同胞兄弟 iPhone 15.只有显示屏大小、尺寸和电池电量与后者不同。

不过，首先要告诉大家一个好消息：iPhone Plus 的价格越来越实惠了。入门级价格下降了 50 欧元（约合 53 美元），最小存储设备版本（也是我们的测试机）的建议零售价为 1099 欧元（约合 1161 美元）。这可能与汇率有关，目前汇率对欧洲更为有利。下表显示了所有价格：

存储空间	iPhone 15 Plus	iPhone 14 Plus	差异
128GB	1,099 欧元 (~$1,161)	1,149 欧元 (~$1,214)	-50 欧元 (~$53) (-4,35 %)
256 GB	1,229 欧元 (~$1,299)	1,279 欧元 (~$1,352)	-50 欧元 (~$53) (-3,91 %)
512 GB	1,479 Eur (~$1,563)	1,539 Eur (~$1,626)	-60 Eur (~$63) (-3,90 %)

iPhone 15 Plus 的基本设计保持不变，只是在正面可以看到动态岛，它取代了凹槽。另一个明显的变化是Lightning 端口换成了 USB-C。此外，这款Apple 智能手机采用了更强大的 SoC，现在还配备了 4800 万像素摄像头，我们已经从 iPhone 14 Pro.我们的测试显示了所有细节。

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Apple iPhone 15 Plus (iPhone 15 Series)

Processor

Apple A16 Bionic 6 x 2 - 3.5 GHz, Crete

Graphics adapter

Apple A16 GPU 5-Core

Memory

6 GB

Display

6.70 inch 19.5:9, 2796 x 1290 pixel 460 PPI, capacitive, Super Retina XDR display, OLED, Ceramic shield, fingerprint-resistant oleophobic coating, Dolby Vision, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB NVMe, 128 GB

, 110.3 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Barometer, high dynamic range gyroscope, high-g accelerometer, proximity sensor, digital compass, OTG, UWB (Gen. 2)

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 53, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 53, 66, 70, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 160.9 x 77.8

Battery

4383 mAh Lithium-Ion, MagSafe wireless charging up to 15 W, Qi up to 7.5 W

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Apple iOS 17

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix (26 mm, f/1.6, sensor‑shift optical image stabilization, 100% Focus Pixels) + 12 MPix (Ultra Wide, 13 mm, f/2.4, 120 °)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.9, autofocus with Focus Pixels) + Face ID

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: onscreen, USB-C cable (1 m), SIM tool, Apple sticker, documentation, 12 Months Warranty, Single-band GNSS: GPS, Glonass, BeidDou, Galileo, QZSS; IP68; head/body-SAR: 0.98 W/kg, fanless, waterproof

Weight

201 g

Price

1099 Euro

Links

Apple homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
89.7 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2023	Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16, A16 GPU 5-Core	201 g	128 GB NVMe	6.70"	2796x1290
89 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2023	Google Pixel 8 Pro Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7	213 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2992x1344
90.3 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Samsung Galaxy S23+ SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740	195 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.60"	2340x1080
86 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	Honor 90 5G SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644	183 g	512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2664x1200
88.1 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2023	Xiaomi 13T Pro Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11	206 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.67"	2712x1220

外壳 - 哑光铝和玻璃

Apple iPhone 15 Plus 的所有颜色（图片：Apple) — 所有颜色

Apple iPhone 15 Plus 的外观与前代产品几乎没有变化。高度不变，但机身纤薄了 0.3 毫米（约 0.012 英寸），长度增加了 0.1 毫米（约 0.004 英寸）。背面的摄像头突出了 3.5 毫米（约 0.14 英寸）。

iPhone 15 Plus 采用哑光铝合金边框，背面玻璃也是哑光的，可防止指纹显露。现在，Apple ，边缘略微变圆，使这款智能手机比前代产品握在手中更加舒适。即使它比 iPhone 14 Plus 轻 2 克（约 0.07 盎司 iPhone 14 Plus但 201 克（约 7 盎司）的重量肯定不算轻。

做工确实不错。在我们的测试机中，只有背面玻璃和边框之间的缝隙不完全平整，而且在试图翘起 iPhone 15 Plus 时，机身内部会发出轻微的吱吱声。

这款智能手机符合 IP68 防水防尘标准。有蓝色、玫瑰红、黄色、绿色和黑色可供选择。

尺寸比较

Google Pixel 8 Pro Xiaomi 13T Pro Honor 90 5G Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple iPhone 14 Plus Samsung Galaxy S23+ DIN A6 ❌

设备 - iPhone 15 Plus 配备动感之岛

iPhone 15 Plus 的设备与其前代产品相比有几处不同。首先，它首次放弃了Lightning 端口，取而代之的是 USB-C。然后，凹槽也消失了，取而代之的是动态岛，前置摄像头和 Face ID 被嵌入显示屏中。相比之下 iPhone 15 Pro Max相比，15 Plus 没有提供操作键，而是继续使用已知的静音键。

在数据传输方面，USB 端口仅使用 2.0 标准，速度与之前的Lightning 端口相同。在使用外部连接的 M2.SSD（华硕 ROG Strix Arion 中的三星 980 Pro，USB 3.2 Gen.2）进行复制测试时，数据传输速度至少为 40.43 MB/s。所连接的存储介质支持 FAT32、exFAT、NTFS（只读）、Mac OS Extended 和 APFS 文件系统。考虑到价格档次，更快的 USB 标准会更合适。在有线显示输出方面，Apple 并没有做出太多妥协，因为它最多可以使用超高清和 HDR。

此外，还集成了 MagSafe、蓝牙 5.3、NFC 和第二代超宽带芯片（UWB）。

软件 - 适用于Apple 智能手机的 iOS 17

虽然Apple iPhone 15 Plus 最初交付时搭载的是 iOS 17，但在我们的测试期间，它已经接受了多次更新，最终版本为 17.1。Apple 没有提供任何有关更新期限的具体信息，但我们可以推测，它至少会在五年内接受更新。

有了 "动态岛"，就多了一个通知和操作元素，我们已经从 iPhone 14 Pro和 14 Pro Max.

我们已经在对 iPhone 15 Pro Max 的测试中详细介绍了 iOS 17 的变化。 iPhone 15 Pro MaxApple 也在专用网页上提供了一些相关信息。.

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 精确定位，但无 6-GHz 无线局域网

为了连接移动互联网，iPhone 15 Plus 能够提供非常广泛的频率支持。在日常操作中，这款智能手机在城市环境中显示出良好的接收质量。

在无线局域网方面，iPhone 15 Plus 最多支持 Wi-Fi 6，考虑到其价格档次，这并不合适。至少支持 Wi-Fi 6E 及其连接的 6 GHz 频段会更合适。另一方面，传输速率相当不错，而且非常稳定。

Networking
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000	749 (min: 725) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	825 (min: 774) MBit/s ∼46%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	897 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	892 (min: 333) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1468 (min: 1069) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1467 (min: 1304) MBit/s ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1623 (min: 1491) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1810 (min: 1724) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1804 (min: 902) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1534 (min: 1403) MBit/s ∼91%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	910 (min: 839) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	939 (min: 470) MBit/s ∼52%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	968 (min: 948) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	988 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1857 (min: 934) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1686 (min: 1654) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000	720 (min: 599) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	789 (min: 533) MBit/s ∼44%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000	714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1385 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼82%

Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic, Apple A16 GPU 5-Core; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø749 (725-758)

Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø909 (839-954)

Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic, Apple A16 GPU 5-Core; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø825 (774-865)

Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø923 (470-967)

为了确定自己的位置，iPhone 15 Plus 可以使用所有全球卫星网络，但只支持单频。尽管有这样的限制，在我们的测试中，Apple 智能手机还是能够非常准确地定位。

在一次短途自行车旅行中，我们将其与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。在总长近 10 公里（约 6.2 英里）的路线上，两款设备的路线记录仅相差 20 米（约 66 英尺）。在详细的路线记录中，iPhone 也没有出现较大的偏差。

电话功能和语音质量

在 SIM 卡支持方面，iPhone 15 Plus 并不缺少 Pro 机型所提供的任何功能。在德国，你仍然可以选择使用实体 Nano-SIM 卡，然后还可以将其与额外的 eSIM 卡结合使用。或者，你也可以纯粹使用双 eSIM 卡。此外，还支持 VoLTE 和 WLAN 通话等功能。

使用听筒，iPhone 15 Plus 通话双方的语音质量都很自然。周围的噪音被相当可靠地过滤掉了，只有少数嘈杂的噪音，如交通噪音，会不时地传入耳中。尽管有时会有轻微的回声，但扬声器也能产生迷人的音质。

摄像头 - iPhone 15 Plus，4800 万像素，2 倍变焦

iPhone 15 Plus 同样使用 1200 万像素前置摄像头。它能以高达 60 FPS 的速度录制超高清分辨率视频。

主摄像头首次采用了 4800 万像素传感器，能够通过传感器位移提供光学防抖（OIS）功能。通过像素分档，你可以选择创建 1200 万像素或 2400 万像素的记录。iPhone 15 Plus 没有配备光学变焦，而是采用了与索尼 Xperia 5 V的类似方法，利用主摄像头的高分辨率实现几乎无损的数码变焦（始终为 1200 万像素）。这样的效果很吸引人，但想要更近距离拍摄的用户很快就会失去一些画质。

此外，还有一个超广角传感器，不过其基本噪点水平相当高，充其量只能为社交媒体提供有用的效果。

Apple 智能手机仍然能够以高达 60 FPS 的超高清分辨率和杜比视界录制视频。此外，它还能以高达 30 FPS 的 4k 分辨率拍摄具有可调虚化级别的影院模式。Apple ProRes 和 ProRAW。

iPhone 15 Plus（26 毫米）

iPhone 15 Plus（52 毫米）

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera Ultraweitwinkel 5-facher Zoom Low-Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

我们在实验室控制光线的条件下，使用 iPhone 15 Plus 的摄像头进行了一些额外的测试。ColorChecker 图表的记录看起来相当自然。只有绿色色调的 DeltaE 值升高，其他色调的再现都过于明亮和饱和。测试图表录制的细节水平很高，仅在边缘区域显示出一些微小的模糊。

在极弱光线（1 Lux）下拍摄的照片会被自动夜间模式增亮很多。在我们的测试中，自动模式选择了 2 秒的曝光时间，这对于手持手机的用户来说并不容易掌握。

配件和保修 - 包装盒内物品有限

iPhone 15 Plus 包装盒内的物品非常少，只有一根 USB 线（USB 2.0）、一个 SIM 卡工具和一张Apple 贴纸。不过，Apple 在其网上商店提供了许多额外的可选配件，如保护套和充电器。

保修期仅为 12 个月，但这并不影响法律规定的保修要求（在德国为 2 年）。Apple 继续提供为期 2 年的Care+保险套餐，一次性费用为 199 欧元（约合 214 美元）。其中包括意外损坏的无限次维修、快速更换服务和优先支持。根据损坏情况，可能还会有一些额外费用。如果您愿意，也可以按月支付服务费（9.99 或 13.49 欧元，约合 10.72 或 14.48 美元），服务期限为两年，但也可以更长。

输入设备和操作 - iPhone 15 Plus 不带操作键

iPhone 15 Plus 的电容式触摸屏具有非常好的滑动特性，输入非常准确。不过，我们的测试机仍不时出现一些轻微的卡顿现象，这肯定不能仅仅归咎于 60Hz 面板。iPad iPad Air 4为例，它采用了相同的刷新率和较弱的 SoC，但操作仍然非常流畅。

Face ID 提供生物识别安全功能，其传感器位于动态岛。人脸识别被认为是非常安全的，而且工作可靠、快速。我们从 Pro 机型上了解到的 "动作 "键在 iPhone 15 Plus 上找不到了，但仍然有一个纯机械的静音键。

触觉引擎可处理振动。这是一个电磁线性马达，可确保清晰悦耳的反馈。其他功能，如 AssistiveTouch、单手模式或背部轻触手势，也继续包括在内。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 更亮，但又只有 60 赫兹

Apple iPhone 15 Plus 的 6.7 英寸（17.02 厘米）显示屏像素密度高达 460 PPI，显示内容也相应清晰锐利。不过，刷新率只有固定的 60 Hz，已经不符合当前超过 1000 欧元价格限制的智能手机的标准。这款智能手机支持 HLG、HDR10 和 Dolby Vision HDR 标准。

亮度比 iPhone 14 Plus前代产品相比，亮度有所提高，在激活亮度传感器和纯白显示内容的情况下，亮度可达 1,045 cd/m²。在一次激活 HDR 的测量中，我们甚至能从面板上获得高达 2,397 cd/m² 的亮度。Apple 实际上，HDR 的亮度仅为 1,600 尼特，室外亮度可达 2,000 尼特。如果手动调节亮度，则最高可达 872 cd/m²。

在使用示波器测量最低显示亮度时，iPhone 15 Plus 显示出 60 Hz 的持续闪烁，其幅度保持稳定。闪烁计甚至显示智能手机的闪烁频率高达 480 Hz，但敏感用户在使用该面板时可能仍会遇到一些困难。


1039 cd/m²	1031 cd/m²	1044 cd/m²
1043 cd/m²	1044 cd/m²	1037 cd/m²
1045 cd/m²	1035 cd/m²	1043 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Super Retina XDR display tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1045 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1040.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.33 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1044 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.14

	Apple iPhone 15 Plus OLED, 2796x1290, 6.7"	Google Pixel 8 Pro OLED, 2992x1344, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy S23+ Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.6"	Honor 90 5G AMOLED, 2664x1200, 6.7"	Xiaomi 13T Pro AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"	Apple iPhone 14 Plus OLED, 2778x1284, 6.7"
Screen		8%	-37%	-23%	-4%	-2%
Brightness middle	1044	1510 45%	1128 8%	1180 13%	1252 20%	797 -24%
Brightness	1040	1467 41%	1136 9%	1202 16%	1230 18%	800 -23%
Brightness Distribution	99	92 -7%	99 0%	88 -11%	96 -3%	97 -2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.2	1.1 8%	2.7 -125%	1.5 -25%	1.4 -17%	0.97 19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.4	3.8 -58%	4.5 -88%	4.8 -100%	3.1 -29%	1.76 27%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.1	1.7 19%	2.6 -24%	2.8 -33%	2.3 -10%	2.3 -10%
Gamma	2.14 ^103%	2.23 ^99%	2.05 ^107%	2.25 ^98%	2.23 ^99%	2.531 ^87%
CCT	6411 ^101%	6670 ^97%	6644 ^98%	6489 ^100%	6590 ^99%	6492 ^100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

60 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度调节的测量系列

iPhone 15 Plus 对显示屏色彩还原的掌控非常出色，至少在关闭 "真实色调"（True Tone）功能的情况下，肉眼看不到任何色彩偏差。不过，使用该功能对眼睛更为温和，因为只有这样，白平衡才会根据周围的光线自动调整，不过这也会导致色调偏暖。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.83 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.901 ms rise
1.83 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.931 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.763 ms rise
3.26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.499 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在户外，iPhone 15 Plus 给人留下了非常好的印象，这也得益于它的显示屏表面只有很少的反光。因此，即使在阳光明媚的日子里，显示屏也始终清晰易读。

Apple iPhone 15 Plus 的视角稳定性也非常好。即使从非常陡峭的视角观看，亮度损失也很小，不会出现任何明显的色纱。

性能 - 配备Apple A16 Bionic 的 iPhone

iPhone 15 Plus 采用 Apple A16 仿生处理器，该处理器曾用于 iPhone 14 Pro和 14 Pro Max中首次使用。该 SoC 可使用 6GB 工作内存，并承诺提供高性能。

基准测试结果也证实了这一点。在 CPU 性能方面，尽管 iPhone 只提供了去年的 SoC，但在任何对比中都毫不逊色。人工智能性能也很高。不过，在日常操作中，我们仍然会发现一些小的卡顿现象，Apple ，在这方面仍有一定的优化空间。

Geekbench 6.3 | Antutu v10 | CrossMark | AImark | Geekbench ML

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	2644 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic (2465 - 2644, n=4)	2576 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1984 Points -25%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1769 Points -33%
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288	1491 Points -44%
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)	1491 Points -44%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	1119 Points -58%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	6673 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic (6019 - 6923, n=4)	6576 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	5149 Points -23%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	4538 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)	4177 Points -37%
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288	3787 Points -43%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	3261 Points -51%

Antutu v10
Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1508318 Points +8%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (1391899 - 1464078, n=3)	1421055 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1391899 Points
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)	1307393 Points -6%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1113506 Points -20%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	714232 Points -49%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	714232 Points -49%
CPU
Average Apple A16 Bionic (368487 - 390270, n=3)	379550 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	368487 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	363615 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (50775 - 3411574, n=106, last 2 years)	354904 Points -4%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	345391 Points -6%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	226129 Points -39%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	226129 Points -39%
GPU
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	611661 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone (18179 - 1250331, n=106, last 2 years)	478293 Points +7%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (446274 - 478636, n=3)	457588 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	446274 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	370494 Points -17%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	170281 Points -62%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	170281 Points -62%
MEM
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	268488 Points +4%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (251912 - 267325, n=3)	258811 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (41757 - 581630, n=106, last 2 years)	258562 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	257195 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	185258 Points -28%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	170329 Points -34%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	170329 Points -34%
UX
Average Apple A16 Bionic (319943 - 327847, n=3)	325106 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	319943 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	264554 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (32037 - 527411, n=106, last 2 years)	244649 Points -24%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	212363 Points -34%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	147493 Points -54%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	147493 Points -54%

CrossMark - Overall
Average Apple A16 Bionic (1260 - 1332, n=3)	1307 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1221 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Plus Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1190 Points
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288	941 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	935 Points
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)	920 Points
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	704 Points

AImark - Score v3.x
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	46207 Points +76%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (26240 - 39328, n=4)	32333 Points +23%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	26240 Points
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)	25319 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	1320 Points -95%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1109 Points -96%
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288	Points -100%

Geekbench ML
0.5 TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5
Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1135 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic (1016 - 1135, n=3)	1065 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (237 - 1418, n=11, last 2 years)	632 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	620 Points -45%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	430 Points -62%
0.5 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	2443 Points +11%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (2207 - 2540, n=3)	2423 Points +10%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	2207 Points
Average of class Smartphone (474 - 2842, n=11, last 2 years)	1769 Points -20%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1085 Points -51%
0.5 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML
Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144	3377 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic (3170 - 3377, n=4)	3235 Points -4%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	2026 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone (344 - 3638, n=10, last 2 years)	1269 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192	672 Points -80%

虽然Apple A16 仿生图形处理器虽然还不支持基于硬件的光线追踪技术，但它在这方面仍有不俗的表现，即使一些竞争对手如 Galaxy S23(Adreno 740)或小米 13T Pro(Immortalis-G715 MP11) 提供更高的性能。

不仅光线追踪性能（3DMark）如此，iPhone 在 GFXBench 的离屏基准测试中的表现也比 iPhone 差。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3699 Points +35%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3011 Points +10%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	2803 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	2730 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2410 Points -12%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	854 Points -69%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3857 Points +24%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	3099 Points
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3067 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	2946 Points -5%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2422 Points -22%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	854 Points -72%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13911 Points +13%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	12268 Points
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11678 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	11543 Points -6%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8922 Points -27%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3137 Points -74%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5603 Points +29%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5098 Points +17%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	4347 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5583 Points +47%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5103 Points +35%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	3790 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.8 fps 0%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	504 fps +6%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	474 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	459 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	438.1 fps -8%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	348 fps -27%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	158 fps -67%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.8 fps 0%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	299 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	271 fps +7%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	254 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	250 fps -2%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	174 fps -31%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	94 fps -63%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps +92%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.8 fps 0%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	55 fps -8%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	193 fps +1%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	191 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	186 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	171.2 fps -10%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	112 fps -41%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps -65%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +82%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81 fps +35%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps +18%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.4 fps -1%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -47%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	123 fps +9%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	113 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	103.2 fps -9%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	103 fps -9%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps -34%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -65%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps +81%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 fps +28%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps +17%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	54 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	49.4 fps -9%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps -57%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps +21%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58 fps +12%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	52 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	40.1 fps -23%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps -29%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18 fps -65%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	91 fps +52%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	78 fps +30%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.8 fps 0%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps -38%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	141 fps +1%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	140 fps
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	136 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	122.2 fps -13%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps -30%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -65%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps +36%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	27 fps +23%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	22 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	20.1 fps -9%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16 fps -27%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7.9 fps -64%

iPhone 15 Plus 在网上冲浪时表现完美无瑕。无论是主观上网行为还是基准测试，Apple ，这款智能手机都能轻松将竞争对手甩在身后。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Apple A16 Bionic (228 - 282, n=4)	262 Points +15%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus (Safari Mobile 17)	228.264 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16)	189.278 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)	176.612 Points -23%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)	136.736 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	124.4 Points -46%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)	105.175 Points -54%
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)	64.3 Points -72%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 15 Plus (Safari Mobile 17)	419 runs/min
Average Apple A16 Bionic (327 - 419, n=4)	373 runs/min -11%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16)	347 runs/min -17%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)	176 runs/min -58%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)	158 runs/min -62%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)	150 runs/min -64%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)	143.9 runs/min -66%
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)	61.8 runs/min -85%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Apple A16 Bionic (201 - 202, n=2)	202 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16)	188 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)	151 Points
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)	117.1 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)	103 Points
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)	95 Points
Honor 90 5G (Chrome 115)	58 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Plus (Safari Mobile 17)	75718 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic (68554 - 75718, n=4)	72639 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16)	64255 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)	60423 Points -20%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)	49506 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points -49%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)	36482 Points -52%
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)	21143 Points -72%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)	2686.1 ms * -497%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * -238%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)	1143.43 ms * -154%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)	840.2 ms * -87%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)	699 ms * -55%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16)	507.3 ms * -13%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (450 - 506, n=4)	475 ms * -6%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus (Safari Mobile 17)	450.2 ms *

* ... smaller is better

游戏 - iPhone 15 Plus，最高 60 FPS

iPhone 15 Plus 符合优秀游戏智能手机的所有要求：强大的 GPU、大尺寸显示屏和出色的双扬声器。遗憾的是，我们无法向您展示GameBench 的测量结果。的测量结果，因为它尚未针对 iOS 17 进行优化。不过，我们会尽快添加。

同时，我们已经尝试在Apple 智能手机上玩《PUBG Mobile》和《Genshin Impact》。这两款游戏的运行都非常流畅，即使在最高细节级别下也是如此。在《源氏冲击》中，只预设了最高 30 FPS 的中等细节级别，但可以轻松更改。

No graph data

排放物 - iPhone 15 Plus 的两个扬声器

温度

尽管Apple iPhone 15 Plus 的表面温度在负载情况下明显升高，但仍保持在 40 °C (104 °F)以下。

在 3DMark 的压力测试中，Apple 智能手机的性能在长期运行中有所下降，但仍快于 Galaxy S23+.

Max. Load

Idle


34.8 °C	35.1 °C	35.3 °C
37.5 °C	36.2 °C	35.4 °C
38.4 °C	38 °C	36.6 °C

Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 36.4 °C


36.6 °C	37.1 °C	36.6 °C
36.9 °C	37.9 °C	37.1 °C
37.9 °C	39.5 °C	39.2 °C

Maximum: 39.5 °C
Average: 37.6 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.6 % +21%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	82 %
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78.8 % -4%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	74.2 % -10%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	65.6 % -20%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53.6 % -35%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.7 % +36%
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	76.7 % +5%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76 % +4%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	73.3 %
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	66.1 % -10%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.8 % -21%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	86.3 % +16%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe	74.4 %

Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø14.5 (13.9-18.9)

Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.3 (13.4-23.1)

Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø51.1 (48.8-59.5)

Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.7 (43-80.2)

Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø9.46 (9.26-10.2)

Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø9.72 (9.25-12.4)

发言人

Apple iPhone 15 Plus 的两个扬声器可产生相对较好的音效，但播放音乐时高音听起来有些空洞，低频也不够明显。

喜欢用耳机或其他外接设备听音乐的用户可以使用 USB 连接或蓝牙。但Apple 仍然没有为后者提供高保真编解码器，用户只能满足于 AAC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Apple iPhone 15 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S23+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 电池容量增至 4,383 毫安时

耗电量

iPhone 15 Plus 在闲置状态下以最大显示亮度运行时的功耗相当高，但面板的亮度也很高，需要的电量也相应较高。

Apple 智能手机使用有线充电器充电，功率可达 20 瓦，充满电需要不到 2 小时。在我们的测试中，28 分钟后即可充满 50%的电量。此外，您还可以通过 MagSafe 为智能手机充电，功率最高可达 15 瓦，或通过无线方式（Qi）充电，功率最高可达 7.5 瓦。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.85 / 0.09 Watt
Idle	0.71 / 2.09 / 2.11 Watt
Load	4.32 / 6.25 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Apple iPhone 15 Plus 4383 mAh	Google Pixel 8 Pro 5050 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23+ 4700 mAh	Honor 90 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 13T Pro 5000 mAh	Apple iPhone 14 Plus 4323 mAh	Average Apple A16 Bionic	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-13%	24%	-34%	-49%	-5%	5%	-16%
Idle Minimum *	0.71	0.63 11%	0.64 10%	1.19 -68%	0.99 -39%	0.7 1%	0.695 ?(0.56 - 0.9, n=4) 2%	0.882 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=157, last 2 years) -24%
Idle Average *	2.09	1.47 30%	0.88 58%	1.71 18%	1.14 45%	1.1 47%	1.54 ?(1 - 2.09, n=4) 26%	1.448 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=157, last 2 years) 31%
Idle Maximum *	2.11	1.55 27%	0.94 55%	1.82 14%	1.34 36%	1.4 34%	1.59 ?(1.1 - 2.11, n=4) 25%	1.603 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=157, last 2 years) 24%
Load Average *	4.32	8.45 -96%	4.18 3%	6.8 -57%	10.06 -133%	6.5 -50%	4.4 ?(3.42 - 6, n=4) -2%	6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=152, last 2 years) -52%
Load Maximum *	6.25	8.63 -38%	6.59 -5%	10.93 -75%	15.94 -155%	9.8 -57%	7.84 ?(5.56 - 13.6, n=4) -25%	9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=152, last 2 years) -59%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.48 (0.956-9.12)

Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.63 (0.82-14.8)

Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.88 (0.855-0.924)

Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.746 (0.695-0.926)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.27 (5.7-6.92)

Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.4 (11.2-13.4)

Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.88 (0.855-0.924)

Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.746 (0.695-0.926)

电池寿命

iPhone 15 Plus 的电池容量比前代产品略大，续航时间也相应延长。只有在最低显示屏亮度下进行的读者测试中，数值才会大幅下降，尽管仍处于优秀水平。

在调整显示亮度（150 cd/m²）时，最容易比较这些数值。在使用无线局域网上网时，这些数值与小米 13T Pro的水平，只有 Galaxy S23+.在连续循环播放视频（离线）的情况下，iPhone 15 Plus 在对比中名列前茅。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		41h 20min
WiFi Websurfing (Safari Mobile 17)		18h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		26h 25min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 36min

	Apple iPhone 15 Plus 4383 mAh	Google Pixel 8 Pro 5050 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23+ 4700 mAh	Honor 90 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 13T Pro 5000 mAh	Apple iPhone 14 Plus 4323 mAh
Battery Runtime		-35%	6%	-33%	-5%	6%
Reader / Idle	2480	1344 -46%	2585 4%	1239 -50%	1798 -27%	3324 34%
H.264	1585	1122 -29%	1524 -4%	990 -38%	1298 -18%	1520 -4%
WiFi v1.3	1102	760 -31%	1196 9%	901 -18%	1099 0%	1085 -2%
Load	336	220 -35%	385 15%	247 -26%	427 27%	325 -3%

Pros

+ 明亮准确的显示屏

+ 快速 SoC

+ 极快的电池寿命

+ IP68 认证

+ 无线充电

+ 精确的全球导航卫星系统

Cons

- 只有 USB 2.0

- 无 6 GHz 无线局域网

- 充电速度慢

- 无蓝牙高保真功能

- 仅提供 12 个月保修

- 无始终在线显示屏

结论 - 不仅仅是 USB

iPhone 15 Plus 并没有很大的飞跃，但仍有一些有趣的改进。这些改进不仅包括新要求的 USB 接口，还包括动态岛、新的主摄像头和更亮的显示屏。

前代产品的特质也得以保留：智能手机能够非常准确地确定自己的位置，电池的续航时间也非常长。此外，手机外壳还符合 IP68 防水防尘标准。无线充电和 UWB 也继续得到支持。

Apple iPhone 15 Plus 是一款非常出色的智能手机，但它并没有提供一些目前已成为同价位手机标准配置的功能。

另一方面，iPhone 仍有一些值得抱怨的地方。其中之一就是缺少 6 GHz 无线局域网。尤其是低刷新率已经不再符合当前的标准，我们非常惊讶地发现系统出现了一些卡顿。如果Apple 能提供更高的 USB 端口传输速率就更好了，而且充电时间也相当长。

对于那些不一定需要使用Apple 的用户，索尼 Xperia 5 V 可以满足他们的需求。索尼 Xperia 5 V或三星Galaxy S23+可能也是一些有趣的选择。如果必须使用Apple ，但又不绝对需要包括 USB 接口，那么 iPhone 14 Pro Max可能是目前更好的选择。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

iPhone 15 Plus 可以直接从Apple899 美元起，也可从亚马逊等其他销售商处购买。

Apple iPhone 15 Plus - 11/03/2023 v7 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

89%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

67 / 70 → 95%

Weight

88%

Battery

93%

Display

94%

Games Performance

69 / 64 → 100%

Application Performance

91 / 86 → 100%

Temperature

90%

Noise

100%

Audio

80 / 90 → 89%

Camera

76%

Average

84%

90%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 535 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 470333 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Apple iPhone 15 Plus 评测 - 配备超大显示屏和强劲电池的 iPhone

Daniel Schmidt, 2023-11- 5 (Update: 2024-08-15)

Apple iPhone 15 Plus 评测 - 配备超大显示屏和强劲电池的 iPhone

终于有 USB 了，但速度很慢。

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 哑光铝和玻璃

尺寸比较

设备 - iPhone 15 Plus 配备动感之岛

软件 - 适用于Apple 智能手机的 iOS 17

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 精确定位，但无 6-GHz 无线局域网

电话功能和语音质量

摄像头 - iPhone 15 Plus，4800 万像素，2 倍变焦

配件和保修 - 包装盒内物品有限

输入设备和操作 - iPhone 15 Plus 不带操作键

显示屏 - 更亮，但又只有 60 赫兹

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 配备Apple A16 Bionic 的 iPhone

游戏 - iPhone 15 Plus，最高 60 FPS

排放物 - iPhone 15 Plus 的两个扬声器

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Apple iPhone 15 Plus audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S23+ audio analysis

电池寿命 - 电池容量增至 4,383 毫安时

耗电量

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 不仅仅是 USB

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison