Apple iPhone 14 Plus智能手机评测--比iPhone 14更好，显示屏更大？

Name: Apple iPhone 14 Plus
Brand: Apple

XXL的替代品。

iPhone 14 Plus是Apple"的第一款非专业6.7英寸智能手机。与iPhone 14相比，Plus版本还具有明显更大的电池，这使它在我们的电池寿命测试中获得创纪录的数字。在本评论中，我们将探讨iPhone 14 Plus是否值得其100美元的价格。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/28/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Apple iOS iPhone Smartphone Touchscreen

通过iPhone 14 Plus，Apple ，试图吸引那些渴望拥有大屏幕iPhone的用户。在过去，这一功能是更昂贵的专业机型的专属。他们是唯一包括6.7英寸设备的机型，而标准的iPhone被限制在6.1英寸的对角线上。

6.7英寸的iPhone 14 Plus来了，它将撼动一切。就像 iPhone 13 Mini，它占据了自己的位置，但采用了相反的方法。它的重点不是将一切都小型化，而是为多媒体内容提供尽可能多的屏幕空间。

由于它们除外形因素外几乎完全相同，iPhone 14 Plus可以被看作是XXL版的 iPhone 14.唯一的区别是与显示屏和电池有关。iPhone 14 Plus的分辨率为2778 x 1284像素，与iPhone 14（2532 x 1170像素）相比，分辨率略高，这在日常使用中很难注意到。

与iPhone 14相比，iPhone 14 Plus的主要优势是其更大的电池。像 iPhone 14 Pro Max一样，它配备了4323毫安时的电池，电池寿命明显优于iPhone 14的3279毫安时电池。

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Apple iPhone 14 Plus (iPhone Series)

Processor

Apple A15 Bionic 6 x 2 - 3.2 GHz

Graphics adapter

Apple A15 GPU 5-Core

Memory

6 GB

Display

6.70 inch 19.5:9, 2778 x 1284 pixel 458 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, OLED, HDR (HDR10, Dolby Vision), glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB NVMe, 128 GB

, 112 GB free

Connections

Audio Connections: Audio via Lightning port, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer, face scanner (3D, infrared), UWB

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 53, 66), 5G (Band n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n20, n25, n26, n28, n30, n38, n40, n41, n48, n53, n66, n70, n77, n78, n79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 160.8 x 78.1

Battery

4323 mAh Lithium-Ion, Charging: 20W (Lightning), 15W (MagSafe), 7.5W (Qi)

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Apple iOS 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix Dual: 12MP (26 mm, ƒ/1.5, sensor‑shift optical image stabilization, 7‑element lens, 4K video) + 12MP (2x optical zoom, 5x digital zoom, 13 mm, ƒ/2.4, 120°, 5‑element lens)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix ƒ/1.9, 6‑element lens

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo speakers (hybrid), Keyboard: Virtual keyboard, Lightning-to-USB-C cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP68-certified; 0.98 W/kg (head), 0.98 W/kg (body), fanless, waterproof

Weight

203 g

Price

899 Euro

Links

Apple homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
88.7 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2022	Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15, A15 GPU 5-Core	203 g	128 GB NVMe	6.70"	2778x1284
89.2 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2022	Apple iPhone 14 A15, A15 GPU 5-Core	172 g	128 GB NVMe	6.10"	2532x1170
89.2 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2022	Google Pixel 6 Pro Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20	210 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	3120x1440
89.3 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2022	Motorola Edge 30 Ultra SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	198.5 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
89.4 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920	228 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.80"	3088x1440
87.6 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2022	Xiaomi 12 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	204 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.73"	3200x1440

外壳 -Apple 最轻的6.7英寸智能手机

Apple iPhone 14 Plus有五种颜色可供选择。除了黑色、白色和红色之外，还有蓝色和紫色的机型。7.8毫米（0.31英寸），Apple 智能手机的扁平度与 iPhone 14而由于其较大的外形尺寸，它的重量比iPhone 14多出30克（1.09盎司）左右。总重量为203克（7.16盎司），感觉明显比其6.7英寸、不锈钢框架的兄弟姐妹要轻。 iPhone 14 Pro Max240克（8.47盎司）。

按照惯例，Apple ，在触觉和制造质量方面没有妥协。这款手机壳的做工非常好，而且非常耐得住边角的扭动。由于整体显示面积更大，与iPhone 14相比，iPhone 14 Plus的缺口的相对尺寸要小。

Apple'的陶瓷盾牌可以保护正面和背面不受划痕和裂缝的影响。iPhone 14 Plus具有IP68规定的防尘和防水功能。根据Apple ，它可以在6米深的地方潜水30分钟而不受到任何损害。

欧洲版的iPhone 14 Plus有一个nano SIM卡插槽。它可以与集成的eSIM卡并行使用。相比之下，美国机型使用双eSIM卡，没有物理卡槽。

尺寸比较

Google Pixel 6 Pro Xiaomi 12 Pro Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Apple iPhone 14 Plus Apple iPhone 14 DIN A6 ❌

连接性 - 与iPhone 13 Pro的基本价格相同

iPhone 14 Plus有三种存储配置。有128GB的NVMe存储，可以直接从Apple ，价格为899美元。256GB的版本价格为999美元，最大的512GB型号为1199美元。

这将iPhone 14 Plus推向了过去只有专业机型才有的价格段。旗舰机型 iPhone 13 Pro，它与 iPhone 13已经不能在Apple"官方商店 "购买，在2021年发布时的基本价格为899美元。

iPhone 14 Plus的功能包括NFC、MagSafe、UWB和蓝牙5.3。与所有的iPhone 14型号一样，它使用Apple"专有的Lightning "连接器进行充电和数据传输，其速度可以达到480 Mb/s，与USB 2.0相当。

软件 - 适用于Apple 智能手机的iOS 16系统

每一代新的iPhone，新版本的Apple"的iOS往往也会到来。在这种情况下，iPhone 14 Plus配备了iOS 16，其中包括新功能，如可定制的锁屏，改进的对焦模式，以及追溯编辑以前发送的信息。iOS 16.1的更新还引入了共享照片库，允许家庭成员和朋友集体管理他们的照片。所有iOS 16新功能的清单可以在这里找到https://www.apple.com/ios/ios-16/.

iOS 16最令人兴奋的新功能，即动态岛和永远在线的显示屏，是为专业机型保留的。

通信和GNSS - Wi-Fi 6和紧急SOS

iPhone 14 Plus以其广泛的支持频率而大放异彩，无论你在什么地方，都应该有良好的信号。美国的机型更进一步，让用户可以使用快速的5G毫米波标准和卫星紧急呼叫。截至目前，后者仅在美国和加拿大可用，但据传言，包括德国在内的更多国家计划在今年年底支持。

无论你身在何处，碰撞检测都是默认启用的。这项功能可以测量加速力，在发生事故时自动呼叫紧急服务。

在Wi-Fi方面，iPhone 14 Plus通过其2根天线进行Wi-Fi 6通信，与我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000一起实现了良好的传输速率。尽管它的Wi-Fi与iPhone 14 Plus完全相同。 iPhone 14，但在我们的测试中，6.7英寸的设备比其较小的兄弟姐妹稍微慢一些。此外，传输速率也不太一致。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1736 (874^min - 1780^max) MBit/s +141%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1465 (1307^min - 1536^max) MBit/s +103%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	881 (446^min - 922^max) MBit/s +22%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	746 (642^min - 765^max) MBit/s +4%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	720 (599^min - 752^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	716 (539^min - 791^max) MBit/s -1%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=184, last 2 years)	714 MBit/s -1%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1710 (876^min - 1774^max) MBit/s +117%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1214 (516^min - 1524^max) MBit/s +54%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	894 (834^min - 918^max) MBit/s +13%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	839 (531^min - 913^max) MBit/s +6%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	789 (533^min - 898^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=186, last 2 years)	729 MBit/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	521 (311^min - 704^max) MBit/s -34%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1704 (852^min - 1767^max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1657 (1379^min - 1781^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1902, n=75, last 2 years)	1451 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1702 (1642^min - 1735^max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1522 (1278^min - 1606^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (668 - 1864, n=75, last 2 years)	1368 MBit/s

Apple iPhone 14 Plus; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø720 (599-752)

Apple iPhone 14 Plus; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø789 (533-898)

iPhone 14 Plus在卫星网络GPS、GLONASS、Galileo、QZSS和BeiDou的帮助下对用户进行定位。卫星上行链路在室内和室外都能迅速建立，精确度在3米（约10英尺）以内。

同样，Apple 手机在现实世界的导航任务中表现良好。iPhone 14 Plus基本上可以准确地记录我们的自行车骑行，就像我们为比较目的而带去的健身智能手表Garmin Venu 2一样。

电话和通话质量

iPhone 14 Plus提供了良好的通话质量，即使在较高的环境中也能清晰地传输声音。虽然环境噪音偶尔会进入通话中，但它们随后会被迅速可靠地过滤掉。虽然在免提模式下清晰度仍然很高，但我们的声音听起来有些小，除非我们直接对着麦克风说话。

iPhone 14 Plus还支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话。eSIM卡可以与nano SIM卡并行使用。由于美国机型缺乏SIM卡插槽，双卡模式只能通过两张eSIM卡来实现。

照相机 - 带有iPhone专业基因的双摄像头

乍一看，在iPhone 14型号的双摄像头设置方面，与iPhone 13相比，似乎没有什么变化。iPhone 13.然而，1200万像素的主摄像头确实得到了重大升级，因为它现在与iPhone 13 Pro的摄像头相同。 iPhone 13专业版.这使得像素大小从1.7微米增加到1.9微米。此外，从f/1.6到f/1.5光圈的变化保证了更好的光线输出。

自拍相机也得到了升级。它也比iPhone 13的前置摄像头捕捉到更多的光线。 iPhone 13(f/1.9 vs. f/2.2)。此外，它现在具有自动对焦功能，以获得更清晰的照片，特别是在近距离。

iPhone 14 Plus的主摄像头带有光学防抖功能，能够拍摄出色彩自然、动态范围大、细节丰富的优秀照片。

在良好的照明条件下，图像与iPhone 13的图像几乎没有区别。然而，在低光照条件下，Apple 光子引擎的优势立即变得明显。得益于图像处理引擎，用iPhone 14 Plus拍摄的照片即使在黑暗场景中也能保留许多细节和丰富的色彩。1200万像素的超广角摄像头没有图像稳定功能，但仍能产生可靠的结果，即使它在图像质量方面不能完全与主摄像头相比。

视频录制也受益于渐进式的代际改进。电影院模式，以前仅限于全高清，现在支持每秒24或30帧的4K。此外，现在还有一个动作模式，能够对用主摄像头或超宽摄像头拍摄的视频进行电子稳定。虽然这在实践中效果出奇的好，但它仍然不能使iPhone成为真正的GoPro替代品，因为动作模式的视频往往看起来相当有颗粒感。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1 Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2 Ultraweitwinkel Lowlight-Aufnahme

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在我们的测试实验室里，主摄像头显示了它在理想光线下非常准确地捕捉色彩的能力。也就是说，灰度的中间范围以及一些绿色和蓝色的色调在某种程度上偏离了其理想值。即使在1勒克斯的条件下，色彩的准确性仍然很高。然而，在这种情况下，主摄像头不能以足够的锐度来捕捉测试图表。

ColorChecker Apple iPhone 14 Plus: 13.23 ∆E min: 4.9 - max: 18.59 ∆E

配件和保修 - 12个月保修和延长的AppleCare+服务

除了iPhone 14 Plus本身，平面包装还包括一条USB线（USB-C toLightning ），一个SIM卡工具，一个Apple 贴纸，一份快速入门指南，以及保修信息。在其官方商店，Apple ，有各种各样的配件，如保险杠、充电器、耳机等提供。

在美国，标准的12个月有限保修期适用。保修期可以通过保险计划AppleCare+来延长。延长保修期，可按月支付无限期保修，或一次性支付2年。无论哪种付款方式，AppleCare+都涵盖了不限次数的意外损坏维修。

输入设备和处理 - XXL显示器，60赫兹

使用iPhone 14 Plus感觉非常精确和反应迅速。由于60赫兹的屏幕，浏览设备的感觉并不像拥有120赫兹屏幕的专业机型那样流畅。虽然它与iPhone 14 Plus有同样的缺点，但 iPhone 14我们的测试机型得益于更大的符号和文字。在这方面，更大的屏幕对频繁使用来说是一个真正的优势。然而，尽管出厂时已经启用了单手模式（从底部边缘向下滑动），但用一只手使用手机仍然很困难。

iPhone 14 Plus没有配备指纹传感器。这使得通过Face ID的面部识别成为唯一支持的生物识别认证方法。由于使用了3D摄像头，它非常可靠，被认为是安全的。由于集成了红外传感器，即使在黑暗中也能通过Face ID解锁智能手机。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 800 Nit OLED面板，带HDR10和杜比视界

iPhone 14 Plus的6.7英寸超级视网膜XDR OLED显示屏的原始分辨率为2778 x 1284像素，固定刷新率为60 Hz。虽然像素密度比iPhone 14 Plus略低。 iPhone 14(2532 x 1170像素），但显示屏仍然非常清晰。支持HDR10和Dolby Vision。

在启用环境光传感器显示纯白色图像时，我们测得的平均亮度为800.1尼特，这几乎完全符合制造商的说法。

iPhone 14 Plus很可能使用直流调光来控制其显示屏亮度。由于Apple ，没有说明如何控制显示器的亮度功能，我们不能确定。在任何情况下，在我们测试的所有亮度设置下，显示屏的闪烁频率都是一致的59Hz。与使用PWM（脉宽调制）控制亮度的显示屏不同，这通常会导致严重的频率波动，而iPhone 14 Plus屏幕的一致闪烁应该会导致明显的眼疲劳，即使对敏感的用户来说也不会成为问题。


808 cd/m²	798 cd/m²	811 cd/m²
790 cd/m²	797 cd/m²	804 cd/m²
792 cd/m²	799 cd/m²	802 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 811 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 800.1 cd/m² Minimum: 11.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 797 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.531

	Apple iPhone 14 Plus OLED, 2778x1284, 6.7"	Apple iPhone 14 OLED, 2532x1170, 6.1"	Google Pixel 6 Pro LTPO-OLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"	Motorola Edge 30 Ultra pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.8"	Xiaomi 12 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen		-12%	3%	0%	13%	-5%
Brightness middle	797	835 5%	794 0%	1020 28%	1077 35%	959 20%
Brightness	800	841 5%	801 0%	1020 28%	1093 37%	977 22%
Brightness Distribution	97	97 0%	97 0%	96 -1%	97 0%	96 -1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.97	1.05 -8%	0.9 7%	1 -3%	1.2 -24%	1.1 -13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.76	2.81 -60%	2.2 -25%	2.8 -59%	2 -14%	3.1 -76%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.3	2.6 -13%	1.5 35%	2.1 9%	1.3 43%	1.9 17%
Gamma	2.531 ^87%	2.034 ^108%	2.23 ^99%	2.29 ^96%	2.37 ^93%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	6492 ^100%	6616 ^98%	6654 ^98%	6502 ^100%	6526 ^100%	6498 ^100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

59 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 59 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 59 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定的变焦水平和各种亮度设置下进行测量

iPhone 14 Plus使用True Tone调整其颜色，以便在不同的环境光线条件下获得同质的视觉体验。由于True Tone会不断改变颜色，我们在进行CalMAN测试之前必须禁用该功能。即使没有True Tone，显示屏的图像质量也很好。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

由于其明亮的显示屏和巨大的可视角度，iPhone 14 Plus很适合在户外使用。即使在阳光直射下，屏幕内容在大多数情况下仍然很容易辨认，尽管反射可能会对体验产生不利影响。相比之下，用户在阴凉处使用该智能手机时应该不会有问题。

性能 - iPhone 13 Pro的5核GPU

与专业机型不同，iPhone 14 Plus没有配备全新的 Apple A16仿生芯片而使用 A15 BionicSoC，来自iPhone 13代。性能仍有小幅提升。iPhone 14 Plus内部的A15仿生芯片与iPhone 13 Pro的相同。 iPhone 13 Pro.不过，它现在没有4核GPU，而是5核GPU。这款iPhone 14使用相同的设置。

在合成基准测试中，iPhone 14 Plus和iPhone 14是目前最快的一些智能手机。为了在AnTuTu v9中击败Apple"的阵容，它需要一个旗舰机的脉络，如小米12 Pro(Snapdragon 8 Gen 1)或摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra(骁龙8+第一代).

由于其额外的GPU核心，iPhone 14 Plus在我们的图形基准测试中的表现与iPhone 13 Pro相同。竞争对手只是在GFXBench的屏幕测试中更快，因为Apple'的刷新率有限，为60赫兹。摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra在图形性能方面最接近iPhone 14 Plus，尽管为了做到这一点，它必须召唤出目前最快的Android SoC的全部力量，即Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1。然而，在涉及到浏览器基准测试时，即使这样也是不够的，因为目前没有Android 手机能够在这方面与Apple 。

Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v9 | CrossMark

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Plus Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1732 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1732 Points 0%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (1590 - 1755, n=9)	1723 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1328 Points -23%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1192 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1154 Points -33%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288	1057 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points -43%
Multi-Core
Average Apple A15 Bionic (4559 - 4914, n=9)	4755 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 14 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	4733 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	4692 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	4251 Points -9%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3738 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	3560 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points -29%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288	2941 Points -37%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1073804 Points +29%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	962824 Points +16%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	832548 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	829792 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)	798401 Points -4%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (722973 - 832548, n=8)	788523 Points -5%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288	720905 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	704479 Points -15%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Plus Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1190 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1180 Points -1%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (1132 - 1190, n=5)	1156 Points -3%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1103 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	942 Points -21%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 12288	906 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)	884 Points -26%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	811 Points -32%

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	2803 Points
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	2776 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2768 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2513 Points -10%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1998 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1916 Points -32%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	3005 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	2946 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2796 Points -5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2609 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2044 Points -31%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1973 Points -33%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	11779 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	11543 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10982 Points -5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10384 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7288 Points -37%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7057 Points -39%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	144 fps +141%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +102%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps +97%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps +69%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.9 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.8 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	456 fps +4%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	446.6 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	438.1 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	425 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	302 fps -31%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	125 fps -71%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	144 fps +141%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	117 fps +96%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	108 fps +81%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps +9%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.9 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.8 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	253 fps +1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	251 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	250 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	237 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	187 fps -25%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps -64%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +99%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps +19%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.9 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.8 fps
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -30%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	179 fps +5%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	172.4 fps +1%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	171.2 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	169 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	127 fps -26%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps -62%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps +50%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.9 fps +1%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps -34%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -39%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -49%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	105.2 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	103.2 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	103 fps 0%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps -34%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	48 fps -53%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps +38%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	57.6 fps +17%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	49.4 fps
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -37%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps -45%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 fps +30%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	40.1 fps
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	38.2 fps -5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps -15%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -25%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	104 fps +74%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.8 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -26%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -30%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	122.2 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	111.1 fps -9%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92 fps -25%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps -44%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)	189.85 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16)	189.278 Points
Average Apple A15 Bionic (173.5 - 189.9, n=8)	182.1 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points -36%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)	117.894 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	96.8 Points -49%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)	91.7 Points -52%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	84.1 Points -56%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16)	347 runs/min
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)	341 runs/min -2%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (228 - 347, n=8)	266 runs/min -23%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min -61%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)	111 runs/min -68%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	108 runs/min -69%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)	99.2 runs/min -71%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	73.5 runs/min -79%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Apple A15 Bionic (188 - 189, n=3)	188.3 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16)	188 Points
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)	188 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)	113.8 Points -39%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)	101 Points -46%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)	279 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16)	277 Points
Average Apple A15 Bionic (219 - 279, n=8)	254 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points -46%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)	145 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	124 Points -55%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	119 Points -57%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)	105 Points -62%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)	65726 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16)	64255 Points
Average Apple A15 Bionic (57143 - 65969, n=8)	63305 Points -1%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)	44034 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points -42%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)	37098 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	34055 Points -47%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	29750 Points -54%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * -209%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	1330 ms * -162%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	1259 ms * -148%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)	1104 ms * -118%
Google Pixel 6 Pro (Chrome 100)	915 ms * -80%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16)	507.3 ms *
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)	496.4 ms * +2%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (414 - 507, n=8)	456 ms * +10%

* ... smaller is better

游戏--强大的游戏智能机

由于其巨大的性能潜力，iPhone 14 Plus毫不费力地运行所有当前的游戏，甚至在最大的细节设置下也能流畅地运行。例如，《PUBG Mobile》在最大的 "超高清/最大 "设置下运行得非常流畅。因此，用户将不必担心由于性能不足而无法运行即将到来的游戏。

由于我们的测试应用程序Gamebench目前还不支持iOS 16，我们很遗憾无法在此显示游戏基准。

排放--连续负荷下的节流

温度

在使用过程中高达36.2°C（97.16°F），iPhone 14 Plus只会变得温热。当长时间推动智能手机时，热点可以达到40℃（104°F）以上。我们观察到连续负载下的节流现象，正如3DMark Wild Life基准测试所显示的。

即使在最初的几个循环之后，在两个 "野生生命 "测试场景中，性能也会下降。在这两种情况下，总的性能下降达30%以上。有趣的是 iPhone 14在我们的压力测试中表现得更好，尽管它配备了相同的SoC，而获得的散热表面积更少。这不是一个主要问题，因为即使是节流的iPhone 14 Plus也能提供丰富的性能。

Max. Load

Idle


35.5 °C	35.8 °C	34.2 °C
37.1 °C	36.6 °C	34.6 °C
37.8 °C	40.7 °C	35.2 °C

Maximum: 40.7 °C
Average: 36.4 °C


32.5 °C	37.8 °C	31.5 °C
33 °C	39 °C	34.7 °C
33.6 °C	43.1 °C	39 °C

Maximum: 43.1 °C
Average: 36 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.1 °C | Room Temperature 19.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	84.1 % +28%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	65.6 %
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59.6 % -9%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58.5 % -11%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47.2 % -28%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43.4 % -34%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	75.5 % +14%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	66.1 %
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63.1 % -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61.8 % -7%
Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 % -33%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	% -100%

Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø12.9 (11.5-17.4)

Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø14 (13.2-17.5)

Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø7.56 (5.37-12.2)

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø13 (10.6-16.7)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø9.2 (7.76-12.6)

Apple iPhone 14 Plus A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44 (37.8-57.7)

Apple iPhone 14 A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø49.9 (48.4-57.6)

Google Pixel 6 Pro Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø27.6 (17.4-40.2)

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.1.0.2: Ø44.1 (36.4-61.1)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.2 (25.9-44.2)

Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø37.8 (27.4-58)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø32.3 (26.8-43.4)

Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø49.5 (34.8-61.7)

发言人

iPhone 14 Plus的立体声扬声器由底部的扬声器和凹槽上方的混合扬声器/听筒组成。这两个声膜最高可达79.8 dB(A)，提供的声音是智能手机的特点，强调中音和高音，缺乏低音。

将外部音频设备连接到Apple 手机，可以获得更好的声音。这可以通过有线Lightning 适配器或无线蓝牙5.3设备来实现。由于iPhone不讲aptX，用户应确保其音频设备支持AAC编解码器。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Apple iPhone 14 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 运行时间很长的智能手机

能源消耗

iPhone 14 Plus在使用过程中是很节能的，尽管竞争对手在整体上至少是一样经济。相较于 iPhone 14相比，我们的测试设备耗电量略大，这可能归因于更大的显示屏。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.1 Watt
Idle	0.7 / 1.1 / 1.4 Watt
Load	6.5 / 9.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Apple iPhone 14 Plus 4323 mAh	Apple iPhone 14 3279 mAh	Google Pixel 6 Pro 5003 mAh	Motorola Edge 30 Ultra 4610 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 12 Pro 4600 mAh	Average Apple A15 Bionic	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		19%	6%	1%	9%	-3%	2%	-15%
Idle Minimum *	0.7	0.6 14%	0.7 -0%	0.74 -6%	0.58 17%	0.94 -34%	0.66 ?(0.51 - 1.1, n=8) 6%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -28%
Idle Average *	1.1	0.8 27%	1 9%	1.84 -67%	0.71 35%	1.24 -13%	1.303 ?(0.8 - 2.2, n=8) -18%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) -32%
Idle Maximum *	1.4	1 29%	1.04 26%	1.86 -33%	1.16 17%	1.34 4%	1.748 ?(1 - 4.2, n=8) -25%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) -15%
Load Average *	6.5	5.4 17%	6.87 -6%	2.75 58%	7.07 -9%	5.7 12%	4.85 ?(2.65 - 6.7, n=8) 25%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) 1%
Load Maximum *	9.8	9.2 6%	9.87 -1%	4.54 54%	11.32 -16%	8.12 17%	7.77 ?(3.56 - 11.4, n=8) 21%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -0%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

Apple iPhone 14 Plus Apple A15 Bionic; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.64 (0.793-9.78)

Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.54 (0.574-10.7)

Apple iPhone 14 Plus Apple A15 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.841 (0.675-1.355)

Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.709 (0.637-1.368)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

Apple iPhone 14 Plus Apple A15 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.55 (7.49-9.12)

Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.76 (4.8-9.44)

Apple iPhone 14 Plus Apple A15 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.841 (0.675-1.355)

Apple iPhone 13 Apple A15 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.709 (0.637-1.368)

电池寿命

电池寿命是iPhone 14 Plus能够将自己与iPhone 14 Plus区分开来的少数类别之一。 iPhone 14.由于其4323毫安时的电池，它达到了几乎没有任何其他智能手机可以比拟的出色运行时间。在模拟网络浏览过程中，它达到了18小时的优异成绩，在视频播放过程中更是达到了超过25小时的惊人成绩。这使iPhone 14 Plus成为铁杆智能手机用户的有趣设备。

由于iPhone 14 Plus的最大充电率被限制在20瓦，给电池充电需要相当长的时间。使用Apple's 20瓦的充电器，为空电池完全充电需要大约2:03小时。另外，智能手机可以通过MagSafe充电，功率高达15瓦，或通过Qi充电，功率高达7.5瓦。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		55h 24min
WiFi Websurfing		18h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		25h 20min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 25min

	Apple iPhone 14 Plus 4323 mAh	Apple iPhone 14 3279 mAh	Google Pixel 6 Pro 5003 mAh	Motorola Edge 30 Ultra 4610 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 12 Pro 4600 mAh
Battery Runtime		-14%	-39%	-19%	-17%	-28%
Reader / Idle	3324	2689 -19%		2206 -34%	1973 -41%	2036 -39%
H.264	1520	1266 -17%		1188 -22%	1078 -29%	788 -48%
WiFi v1.3	1085	1010 -7%	667 -39%	872 -20%	844 -22%	766 -29%
Load	325	289 -11%		323 -1%	410 26%	337 4%

Pros

+ 卓越的OLED显示屏

+ 防尘和防水

+ 快速的Wi-Fi

+ 支持的频率范围广

+ 优秀的相机

+ 非常快的性能

+ 良好的电池寿命

Cons

- 显示限制在60赫兹

- 充电率限制在20瓦

- 没有微距镜头

- 宽缺口

对Apple iPhone 14 Plus的评价

由于Apple iPhone 14 Plus与iPhone 14有很多共同点 iPhone 14我们的结论也非常相似。iPhone 14 Plus也是一款优秀的智能手机，在设计、制造质量、显示屏、相机、电池寿命和性能方面都是顶级选择。同时，它也是第一款拥有6.7英寸显示屏的非专业iPhone。

与iPhone 14的6.1英寸显示屏相比，更大的尺寸在日常使用中非常明显。电池寿命明显延长，而且由于6.7英寸的屏幕，浏览网页、聊天或浏览iOS设置可以是一种更好、更舒适的体验。

虽然Apple iPhone 14 Plus是一款非常好的智能手机，电池寿命出色，但其功能并不能完全证明其价格。

这就提出了一个问题。iPhone 14 Plus究竟是为哪一类用户准备的？其899美元的起价可能已经让许多潜在客户望而却步，尽管与iPhone 14相比，为更大的显示屏支付100美元的溢价仍然相对适中。然而，Apple ，它是自己最强硬的竞争对手，而iPhone 14 Plus并没有辜负它的价格。

6.7英寸的 iPhone 13 Pro Max将可能成为iPhone 14 Plus的主要竞争对手。虽然它的价格非常相似，但它有更多的东西可以提供。一个120赫兹的显示屏，一个额外的长焦镜头，以及一个不锈钢框架，都是iPhone 14 Plus所缺乏的功能。同时， iPhone 14 Pro Max做到了iPhone 13 Pro Max的一切，甚至更多，包括动态岛和永远在线的显示屏等额外功能--尽管比我们的测试模型至少多出200美元。

Apple iPhone 14 Plus的替代品包括iPhone 13 Pro和iPhone 14 Pro Max，以及，例如：三星Galaxy S22 Ultra和小米12 Pro.

价格和可用性

iPhone 14 Plus 128 GB可以从，直接购买。Apple购买，价格为899美元。256GB和512GB的型号分别为999美元和1199美元。根据颜色的不同，第三方零售商可能会有更便宜的优惠。

Apple iPhone 14 Plus - 10/25/2022 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

90%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 90%

Pointing Device

95%

Connectivity

48 / 70 → 69%

Weight

88%

Battery

93%

Display

90%

Games Performance

72 / 64 → 100%

Application Performance

91 / 86 → 100%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

80 / 90 → 89%

Camera

80%

Average

83%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Apple iPhone 14 Plus智能手机评测--比iPhone 14更好，显示屏更大？

Manuel Masiero, 2022-10-28 (Update: 2024-08-15)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 -Apple 最轻的6.7英寸智能手机

尺寸比较

连接性 - 与iPhone 13 Pro的基本价格相同

软件 - 适用于Apple 智能手机的iOS 16系统

通信和GNSS - Wi-Fi 6和紧急SOS

电话和通话质量

照相机 - 带有iPhone专业基因的双摄像头

配件和保修 - 12个月保修和延长的AppleCare+服务

输入设备和处理 - XXL显示器，60赫兹

显示屏 - 800 Nit OLED面板，带HDR10和杜比视界

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - iPhone 13 Pro的5核GPU

游戏--强大的游戏智能机

排放--连续负荷下的节流

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Apple iPhone 14 Plus audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G audio analysis

电池寿命 - 运行时间很长的智能手机

能源消耗

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

对Apple iPhone 14 Plus的评价

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison