Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

微星 Cubi NUC M1 迷你 PC 评测:性能稳定,但价格高于竞争对手

每美元性能可以更好。

Cubi NUC M1 不一定做得很差,但也没有在任何关键类别中表现出色。与更便宜、更快的替代产品相比,其酷睿 7 配置 900 多美元的高价显得格外刺眼。
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
MSI Mini PC Raptor Lake

结论 - 可靠但价格昂贵

回顾:微星 Cubi NUC M1。测试机由微星提供
回顾:微星 Cubi NUC M1。测试机由微星提供

Cubi NUC M1 是一款精心打造的迷你 PC,适用于办公室或会议室应用。它集成了两个 Thunderbolt 4 端口和一个 MicroSD 读卡器,而其他大多数迷你 PC 只有一个 Thunderbolt 端口,根本没有 SD 读卡器。如果你的工作负载可以在日常工作中利用这些特定功能,那么微星迷你 PC 将是一个值得选择的产品。

Cubi NUC M1 是一款基本的办公迷你电脑,其建议零售价并不低。如果你不介意失去集成的 MicroSD 阅读器,还有更便宜、更快速的替代产品。

Pros

+ 易于访问;支持 2x SODIMM + 2x M.2 固态硬盘
+ 多个 Thunderbolt 4 端口
+ 集成 MicroSD 读卡器
+ 安静

Cons

- 无集成指纹识别器
- 没有 Core Ultra H 选项
- 指纹磁铁
- 昂贵

Cubi NUC M1 的主要问题在于其昂贵的价格,仅酷睿 i5 120U 配置的价格就高达 800 美元,而酷睿 i7 配置的价格则接近 1000 美元。替代产品 Beelink GMK 的替代品价格要低几百美元,但可提供更快的 CPU 选项和类似的机箱尺寸。因此,与竞争对手相比,其价值低于预期。

价格和供应情况

Cubi NUC M1现已在亚马逊发货,酷睿 i5 配置售价 800 美元,酷睿 i7 配置售价 950 美元。

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Geizhals
Weight
Height
Display
1.
66.1%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Intel Core 7 150U ⎘
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Bestpreis 764.99€ nullprozentshop.de
2. 764.99€ galaxus
3. 764.99€ notebooksbilliger.de
660 g50.1 mmx
2.
67.3%
GMK NucBox K9
GMK NucBox K9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H ⎘
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Listenpreis 560 USD
Geizhals Suche
528 g47 mmx
3.
74.7%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H ⎘
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU ⎘
, 2048 GB SSD
Bestpreis 449€ computeruniverse.net
2. 449€ Cyberport Stores Österreich
3. 449€ Cyberport.at
525 g37 mmx
4.
Beelink SEi11 Pro
Beelink SEi11 Pro
Intel Core i5-11320H ⎘
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘
16 GB Memory, 500 GB SSD
Listenpreis 430 USD440 g40 mmx
5.
74.9%
Beelink SER8
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Listenpreis 650 USD776 g44.7 mmx
6.
84.5% v7 (old)
BOSGAME M1
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
32 GB Memory
Listenpreis 690 USD766 g51 mmx

微星Cubi系列填补了英特尔决定停止生产自己的NUC系列后留下的空白。微星 Cubi 系列的目标用户是核心企业用户和办公室用户,在这些用户中,低配置 PC 比高性能 PC 更受青睐。

我们的测试机是采用 Raptor Lake-U Refresh 酷睿 7 150U CPU 的最高端配置,而采用酷睿 5 120U 或酷睿 3 100U 的配置则是较低端的选择。

Cubi NUC M1 的替代产品包括其他采用 U 系列处理器的小型 PC,如 GMK NucBox M5Beelink Mini S12 Pro.

更多微星评论:

规格

MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Processor
Intel Core 7 150U 10 x 1.2 - 5.4 GHz, 32 W PL2 / Short Burst, 20 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-U Refresh
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Core: 1300 MHz, RAM: 2600 MHz, DDR5, 32.0.101.5972
Memory
16 GB 
, Samsung, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 42-42-42-82
Mainboard
Intel Raptor Lake-P PCH
Storage
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, 1024 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS
Connections
6 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: MicroSD
Networking
Intel Ethernet Controller I226-V (10/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 50.1 x 135.6 x 132.6
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Additional features
2.5-inch SATA III adapter, MSI Center, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
660 g, Power Supply: 536 g
Price
950 USD
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

案例

机箱主要采用塑料材质,两侧内衬采用金属加固。虽然这增加了机身的重量,但却给人更高的品质感,尤其是当 Beelink 或 GMK 的许多替代产品为了节省成本而使用更少的金属材料时。

不幸的是,光滑的黑色哑光表面很容易留下指纹。如果有类似微星 Prestige 系列的白色或银色可供选择,就能缓解这一问题。

尺寸比较

136 mm 132 mm 51 mm 766 g135.6 mm 132.6 mm 50.1 mm 660 g135 mm 135 mm 44.7 mm 776 g128 mm 126 mm 47 mm 528 g126 mm 113 mm 40 mm 440 g117 mm 112 mm 37 mm 525 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

连接性

与大多数其他迷你电脑不同,该系统包含一个速度相当快的集成 MicroSD 读卡器,这应该会吸引一些相机用户和内容创作者。与大多数 Beelink 迷你电脑不同的是,该系统还配备了两个 USB-C 端口,我们对此表示赞赏。

值得注意的是,如果丢失了包装盒中的桶式交流适配器,还可以使用第三方 USB-C 交流适配器为系统供电。

正面:3.5 毫米组合音频、2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2(10 Gbps)、MicroSD 读卡器、电源按钮,左侧:Kensington 锁
正面:3.5 毫米组合音频、2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2(10 Gbps)、MicroSD 读卡器、电源按钮,左侧:Kensington 锁
后部:2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2(10 Gbps)、2x USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 4 + Power Delivery + DisplayPort、2x HDMI 2.1、2x RJ-45(2.5 Gbps)、桶状交流适配器
后部:2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2(10 Gbps)、2x USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 4 + Power Delivery + DisplayPort、2x HDMI 2.1、2x RJ-45(2.5 Gbps)、桶状交流适配器

SD 读卡器

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Intel Core 7 150U (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
53 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Intel Core 7 150U (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
196.9 MB/s

交流

标配支持 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3。如果能支持 Wi-Fi 7 就更好了,尤其是在这个价位。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
BOSGAME M1
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1470 (1310min - 1625max) MBit/s +131%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1331 (1187min - 1442max) MBit/s +109%
GMK NucBox K9
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
823 (607min - 901max) MBit/s +29%
Beelink SER8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
812 (641min - 888max) MBit/s +28%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
636 (430min - 784max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
BOSGAME M1
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1479 (1255min - 1539max) MBit/s +114%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1379 (1016min - 1613max) MBit/s +99%
Beelink SER8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
784 (679min - 845max) MBit/s +13%
GMK NucBox K9
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
764 (635min - 829max) MBit/s +10%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
692 (506min - 872max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1400 (1199min - 1463max) MBit/s
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1379 (1299min - 1425max) MBit/s -1%
BOSGAME M1
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1324 (1090min - 1580max) MBit/s -5%
Beelink SEi11 Pro
MediaTek RZ608
722 (447min - 789max) MBit/s -48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1729 (1594min - 1755max) MBit/s +11%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1560 (1528min - 1585max) MBit/s
BOSGAME M1
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1321 (1233min - 1393max) MBit/s -15%
Beelink SEi11 Pro
MediaTek RZ608
743 (453min - 793max) MBit/s -52%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550Tooltip
MSI Cubi NUC 1M; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1400 (1199-1463)
MSI Cubi NUC 1M; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1559 (1528-1585)

维护

只需一把十字螺丝刀就能轻松拆下底部金属板,露出可升级的组件。请注意,与许多英特尔 NUC 型号不同,这些螺丝不是指旋螺丝。

底部显示 VESA 兼容性
底部显示 VESA 兼容性
轻松访问两个 SODIMM 插槽、两个 M.2 固态硬盘插槽(2280 + 2242)以及主固态硬盘下方的可移动 M.2 WLAN 模块
轻松访问两个 SODIMM 插槽、两个 M.2 固态硬盘插槽(2280 + 2242)以及主固态硬盘下方的可移动 M.2 WLAN 模块

可持续性

微星在生产过程中使用了 42.9% 的消费后再生塑料和可持续采购的木浆作为包装。不过,AC 适配器和配件仍使用塑料包装。

配件和保修

机身附带一条可拆卸的 SATA III 电缆,用户可将外置 2.5 英寸 SATA III 硬盘连接到机身右侧的一个特殊端口。这不是一个非常优雅的解决方案,但至少提供了选择,而现在大多数其他迷你 PC 都完全不支持 2.5 英寸 SATA。

制造商提供标准的一年有限保修服务,并可选择延长至三年。

性能

 
 

测试条件

在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 和 MSI Center 设置为性能模式。

处理器

虽然 酷睿 7 150U虽然相对较新,但它基于较旧的 Raptor Lake-U 平台,因此性能与即将推出的 酷睿 i7-1365U.它缺乏流星湖平台的集成 AI 功能和改进的集成 Arc 图形处理器。

降至 酷睿 5 120U如果你想省钱,那么酷睿 5 SKU 可能值得考虑。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

0135270405540675810945108012151350148516201755189020252160229524302565Tooltip
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Intel Core 7 150U: Ø971 (535.59-1039.66)
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H: Ø1902 (1827.4-1965.8)
Asus NUC 14 Pro Intel Core Ultra 5 125H: Ø2021 (1900.15-2203.13)
Beelink SEi11 Pro Intel Core i5-11320H: Ø851 (845.25-856.84)
Beelink SER8 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2607 (2586.82-2626.57)
BOSGAME M1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2554 (2501.09-2597.23)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE
Intel Core i9-14900
90.6 pt
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
68.8 pt
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
67.9 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
67 pt
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA
Intel Core i5-14500
63.4 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
58.9 pt
GMK NucBox K9 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
57.2 pt
Khadas Mind 2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
55.2 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
54.2 pt
Beelink SER6 Pro Ryzen 7 7735HS -2!
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
53 pt
Average Intel Core 7 150U
 
52.7 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 15IRU9
Intel Core 5 120U
52 pt
Beelink SER6 Pro -2!
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
51.9 pt
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Intel Core 7 150U
51.1 pt
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
50.7 pt
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
36.1 pt
Beelink SEi11 Pro -2!
Intel Core i5-11320H
35.4 pt
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1040 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
108 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
258 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
718 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2821 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
7226 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1878 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
108.5 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
432 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
98.4 pt
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
97.4 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
63.2 pt
GMK NucBox K9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
59.6 pt
Average Intel Core 7 150U
 
40.2 pt
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
36.4 pt
Beelink SEi11 Pro
Intel Core i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
35.2 pt

压力测试

如下面的截图所示,当启动 Prime95 压力测试时,CPU 会提升至 2.6 GHz 和 31 W,持续时间只有几秒钟,然后下降并稳定在 1.9 GHz 和 20 W。最大 Turbo Boost 无法持续,这在搭载 U 系列的 PC 上是意料之中的。

运行《赛博朋克 2077》时,核心温度稳定在 69 摄氏度,而运行速度更快的 NucBox K9.

系统空闲
系统空闲
赛博朋克 2077》压力
赛博朋克 2077》压力
Prime95 压力
Prime95 压力
Prime95+FurMark 压力
Prime95+FurMark 压力
CPU 时钟 (GHz) GPU 时钟 (MHz) CPU 平均温度 (°C)
系统闲置 -- -- 50
Prime95 压力 1.9 -- 72
Prime95 + FurMark Stress 1.4 599 70
赛博朋克 2077》压力 0.7 998 69

系统性能

PCMark 10 的成绩还算不错,但由于 Iris Xe GPU 运行速度较慢,在数字内容创建子测试中表现不佳。
PCMark 10 的成绩还算不错,但由于 Iris Xe GPU 运行速度较慢,在数字内容创建子测试中表现不佳。
PCMark 10 / Score
Beelink SER8
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
7641 Points +26%
BOSGAME M1
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS
7198 Points +18%
GMK NucBox K9
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
6463 Points +6%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
6282 Points +3%
Average Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (6080 - 6173, n=2)
6127 Points +1%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
6080 Points
Beelink SEi11 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i5-11320H, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN
5095 Points -16%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
6080 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
BOSGAME M1
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
69508 MB/s +17%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
69264 MB/s +16%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
68283 MB/s +15%
GMK NucBox K9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core
67482 MB/s +13%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Intel Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
59609 MB/s
Average Intel Core 7 150U
  (36579 - 61190, n=4)
53226 MB/s -11%
Beelink SEi11 Pro
Intel Core i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
41106 MB/s -31%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签时,LatencyMon 会显示轻微的 DPC 问题。在其他方面,以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频的效果也非常出色,在 60 秒的时间内仅记录到一次丢帧。

延迟监控
延迟监控
驱动程序列表
驱动程序列表
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
GMK NucBox K9
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
29083.3 μs * -609%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4103.1 μs *
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
2776 μs * +32%
BOSGAME M1
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS
1179.5 μs * +71%
Beelink SER8
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1071.2 μs * +74%
Beelink SEi11 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i5-11320H, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN
167.2 μs * +96%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的设备配备了中端 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00M.2 PCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘,提供高达 5000 MB/s 的稳定传输速率。我们很高兴固态硬盘散热器是标准配置并已预装。

AS 固态硬盘
AS 固态硬盘
CDM 8
CDM 8
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4996 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2784 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 846.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 551.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4572 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2754 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 74.62 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 260.7 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
GMK NucBox K9
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
83.9 pt
Beelink SER8
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
64.2 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
63.5 pt
BOSGAME M1
 
57 pt
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
56.9 pt
Beelink SEi11 Pro
Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN
37.7 pt

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

02605207801040130015601820208023402600286031203380364039004160442046804940Tooltip
MSI Cubi NUC 1M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4962 (4554.8-4986.07)
Beelink SER8 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5188 (4957.94-5197.46)

图形处理器性能

鸢尾花 Iris Xe G7 96 EUsIris Xe G7 96 EU 现在已经有好几年的历史了,因此远远落后于大多数运行 Meteor Lake 或 Zen 4 或更高平台的新型迷你 PC。因此,Cubi NUC M1 更适合用于流媒体和轻度 2D 游戏。

在平衡模式而非性能模式下运行似乎不会影响性能,因为在我们的测试中,它们的 3DMark 分数几乎相同。

降至酷睿 5 120U 配置预计会影响图形处理性能约 10%至 20%,因为酷睿 5 CPU 与速度较慢的集成 Iris Xe 80 EUs相反。

X-Plane无法在我们的 Cubi M1 设备上启动,因此下面无法提供其测试结果。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Time Spy
Time Spy
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Beelink SER8
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
97.2 pt
GMK NucBox K6 -1!
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
94.7 pt
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE
NVIDIA T1000, Intel Core i9-14900
93.4 pt
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
92.3 pt
Khadas Mind 2
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
92.2 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
88.7 pt
GMK NucBox K9
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
81.6 pt
Beelink SER6 Pro
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
80.4 pt
Beelink SER6 Pro Ryzen 7 7735HS -1!
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
78.4 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
59.6 pt
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
54.7 pt
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core 7 150U
50.4 pt
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
49.9 pt
Beelink SEi11 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i5-11320H
48.4 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 15IRU9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core 5 120U
46.5 pt
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
41.1 pt
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA
Intel UHD Graphics 770, Intel Core i5-14500
27.3 pt
3DMark 11 Performance
6689 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
20251 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
4527 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1602 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Beelink SER6 Pro
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
318 Seconds *
Beelink SER6 Pro Ryzen 7 7735HS
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
314 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE
NVIDIA T1000, Intel Core i9-14900
159 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE
NVIDIA T1000, Intel Core i9-14900
159 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Beelink SEi11 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i5-11320H
995 Seconds * -20%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core 7 150U
829 Seconds *
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
758 Seconds * +9%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (336 - 1259, n=103)
692 Seconds * +17%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
497 Seconds * +40%
Beelink SER6 Pro
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
453 Seconds * +45%
Khadas Mind 2
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
448 Seconds * +46%
Beelink SER6 Pro Ryzen 7 7735HS
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
445 Seconds * +46%
GMK NucBox K9
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
435 Seconds * +48%
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
399 Seconds * +52%
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9X6EA
Intel UHD Graphics 770, Intel Core i5-14500
396 Seconds * +52%
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
327 Seconds * +61%
Geekom AX8 Pro
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945H
326 Seconds * +61%
Beelink SER8
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
310 Seconds * +63%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE
NVIDIA T1000, Intel Core i9-14900
263 Seconds * +68%
v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
GMK NucBox K9
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
308 Seconds *
Khadas Mind 2
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
225 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
BOSGAME M1 -1!
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
99.3 pt
Beelink SER8 -1!
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
97.4 pt
Asus NUC 14 Pro -2!
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
83.9 pt
GMK NucBox K9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
80.2 pt
Beelink SEi11 Pro -3!
Intel Core i5-11320H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
59.4 pt
MSI Cubi NUC 1M -2!
Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
55.5 pt
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
1280x720 Lowest Preset (DX12)
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE
Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000
139.9 fps +269%
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
139 fps +267%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
127.9 fps +237%
GMK NucBox K9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
89 fps +135%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
80.8 fps +113%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
54.5 fps +44%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (25.9 - 67.3, n=32)
50 fps +32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 15IRU9
Intel Core 5 120U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
39.2 fps +3%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
37.9 fps
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12)
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
74.6 fps +171%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
72.8 fps +165%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE
Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000
69.2 fps +152%
Beelink SER6 Pro Ryzen 7 7735HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
58.6 fps +113%
GMK NucBox K9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
50.7 fps +84%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
40 fps +45%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (22.3 - 53, n=32)
29.9 fps +9%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
27.5 fps
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
27.3 fps -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 15IRU9
Intel Core 5 120U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
24.7 fps -10%
1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12)
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE
Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000
55.6 fps +174%
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
52.8 fps +160%
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
52.2 fps +157%
Beelink SER6 Pro Ryzen 7 7735HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
44.4 fps +119%
GMK NucBox K9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
39.4 fps +94%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
31.3 fps +54%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (17 - 40.1, n=30)
23.6 fps +16%
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
21.5 fps +6%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
20.3 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 15IRU9
Intel Core 5 120U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
18.8 fps -7%
1920x1080 High Preset (DX12)
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
36.8 fps +163%
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
36.6 fps +161%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE
Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000
35.3 fps +152%
Beelink SER6 Pro Ryzen 7 7735HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
29.9 fps +114%
GMK NucBox K9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
26.8 fps +91%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
20.5 fps +46%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (10.6 - 24.1, n=29)
15.1 fps +8%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
14 fps
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
13.8 fps -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 15IRU9
Intel Core 5 120U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
12.3 fps -12%
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12)
Beelink SER8
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M
29.6 fps +172%
GMK NucBox K6
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
29.5 fps +171%
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE
Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000
27.6 fps +153%
Beelink SER6 Pro Ryzen 7 7735HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M
23.1 fps +112%
GMK NucBox K9
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
22.4 fps +106%
GMK NucBox M6
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, AMD Radeon 660M
15.6 fps +43%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (8.4 - 18.4, n=26)
11.9 fps +9%
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Intel Core 7 150U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
10.9 fps
GMK NucBox M5
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
10.3 fps -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i 15IRU9
Intel Core 5 120U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
9.5 fps -13%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart

0123456789Tooltip
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø9.7 (7.82-9.96)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 100.3 86.1 23.6 9.98
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 97.7 61.9 62.5 57.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 40.9 23 16.6
Far Cry 5 (2018) 49 28 26 24
Strange Brigade (2018) 88.2 38.9 31.1 25.2
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) 27.5 20.3 14 10.9
F1 22 (2022) 42.3 38.2 28.3 21.4
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 15.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 15.4 12.4 10.8 9.46

排放量

系统噪音

内部风扇始终处于激活状态,基线噪音约为 30 dB(A)。好消息是,在典型的办公室或会议室环境中几乎听不到噪音。此外,风扇的惰性相对较小,因此即使在中高负载运行时,转速也不会突然或大幅上升。

风扇噪音曲线(白色:背景,红色:系统空闲,蓝色:3DMark 06,橙色:《赛博朋克 2077》,绿色:《赛博朋克 2077》:赛博朋克 2077,绿色:Prime95+FurMark 压力)
风扇噪音曲线(白色:背景,红色:系统空闲,蓝色:3DMark 06,橙色:《赛博朋克 2077》,绿色:《赛博朋克 2077》:赛博朋克 2077,绿色:Prime95+FurMark 压力)

Noise Level

Idle
29.9 / 29.9 / 32 dB(A)
Load
33.5 / 40.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.633.329.434.929.9252425.823.326.224.23124.724.422.724.121.24022.421.620.221.520.75025.622.42224.725.86330.130.23030.223.18023.521.522.522.925.61002320.420.31925.112524.821.722.321.824.316023.823.525.716.124.920032.526.327.513.829.525027.522.821.214.829.331525.724.222.517.826.540027.324.223.815.428.850028.429.526.412.829.163031.425.924.911.333.280028.122.822.210.129.9100026.521.919.99.827.4125029.521.620.99.530.2160031.824.222.61033.4200028.220.318.410.529.9250022.61513.910.624315027.819.118.11129.3400019.818.515.611.321.3500020.515.41411.821.8630014.313.513.112.115.2800014.514.913.61214.11000013.614.2131212.61250013.213.612.81212.3160001515.913.711.312.2SPL39.133.53223.740.4N31.81.60.53.3median 25.7median 21.6median 20.3median 12median 26.5Delta4.24.252.45.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI Cubi NUC 1M
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Core 7 150U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
GMK NucBox K9
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
Beelink SEi11 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i5-11320H, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN
Beelink SER8
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
BOSGAME M1
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS
Noise
-11%
-4%
11%
5%
-6%
off / environment *
23.5
23
2%
24
-2%
22.8
3%
23.6
-0%
23.2
1%
Idle Minimum *
29.9
29.8
-0%
26
13%
24.7
17%
28.8
4%
32
-7%
Idle Average *
29.9
35.7
-19%
26.2
12%
24.7
17%
28.8
4%
32
-7%
Idle Maximum *
32
35.7
-12%
26.2
18%
25.3
21%
30.5
5%
32
-0%
Load Average *
33.5
41.9
-25%
42.4
-27%
33.2
1%
34.6
-3%
38.7
-16%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
39.1
43.8
-12%
47.7
-22%
34.1
13%
Load Maximum *
40.5
44
-9%
47.8
-18%
37.8
7%
34.5
15%
42
-4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
34.5
41.7

* ... smaller is better

温度

交流适配器在负载情况下温度超过 35 C
交流适配器在负载情况下温度超过 35 C

与大多数其他迷你 PC 不同,Cubi NUC M1 除了底部和后部外,几乎所有侧面都没有通风栅。不过,高能效的 U 系列 CPU 意味着表面温度不会成为问题。即使长时间运行苛刻的负载,顶部的热点温度也会保持在 30 摄氏度以下。

系统空闲(前)
系统空闲(前)
系统空闲(后部)
系统空闲(后部)
Prime95+FurMark 压力(前部)
Prime95+FurMark 压力(前部)
Prime95+FurMark 应力(后部)
Prime95+FurMark 应力(后部)

能源管理

耗电量

中型(约 13 x 6.8 x 2.7 厘米)桶式 120 瓦交流适配器
中型(约 13 x 6.8 x 2.7 厘米)桶式 120 瓦交流适配器

功耗普遍低于大多数使用 H 型电源的微型电脑,尤其是在运行要求较高的负载时。最值得注意的是,该系统随附了一个 120 W 的大型交流适配器,尽管在 CPU 使用率为 100% 的情况下,迷你 PC 的功耗仅为一半。高额开销可用于为 Thunderbolt 配件或其他外部设备供电。

我们希望未来能像现代 U 系列笔记本电脑一样,改用通用的 USB-C AC 适配器。

3DMark 06 消耗量
3DMark 06 消耗量
赛博朋克 2077》1080p 超高清消费
赛博朋克 2077》1080p 超高清消费
启动 Prime95 会使功耗在短短几秒钟内飙升至 54 瓦,然后由于热限制而下降并稳定在 39 瓦。
启动 Prime95 会使功耗在短短几秒钟内飙升至 54 瓦,然后由于热限制而下降并稳定在 39 瓦。
Prime95+FurMark 在 10 秒处启动应力测试
Prime95+FurMark 在 10 秒处启动应力测试
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.18 / 1.9 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6.4 / 8.3 / 10.4 Watt
Load midlight 38.5 / 52.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI Cubi NUC 1M
Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, , x,
GMK NucBox K9
Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000, , x,
Asus NUC 14 Pro
Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G, , x,
Beelink SEi11 Pro
i5-11320H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Kingston NV1 SNVS/500GCN, , x,
Beelink SER8
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x,
BOSGAME M1
R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, , , x,
Power Consumption
-41%
-34%
-26%
-24%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
6.4
10.9
-70%
5.1
20%
9.8
-53%
7.3
-14%
7.3
-14%
Idle Average *
8.3
11
-33%
6.4
23%
10.3
-24%
7.3
12%
7.3
12%
Idle Maximum *
10.4
11.4
-10%
14.7
-41%
10.5
-1%
8.4
19%
8.4
19%
Load Average *
38.5
52.8
-37%
55.5
-44%
54.2
-41%
68.2
-77%
72.7
-89%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
36.1
57.1
-58%
59.1
-64%
Load Maximum *
52.5
72.2
-38%
103.3
-97%
59
-12%
84.3
-61%
99.1
-89%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53.1
75.1
80.5

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test

0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø40.2 (37.4-52.6)
Beelink SER6 Pro R7 6800H, Radeon 680M: Ø63.3 (62-72)

Power Consumption external Monitor

0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø40.6 (37.7-53.5)
Beelink SER6 Pro R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø62.1 (60.9-70.6)
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø45 (33.5-48.5)
Beelink SER6 Pro R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø61 (57.5-66.4)
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø35.6 (32.5-49.3)
Beelink SER6 Pro R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø62.6 (61.3-68.3)
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10.5 (6.41-13.6)
Beelink SER6 Pro R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø8.51 (8.12-9.32)
MSI Cubi NUC 1M Core 7 150U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø36.1 (35.5-37.1)

Notebookcheck Rating

MSI Cubi NUC 1M - 10/30/2024 v8
Allen Ngo

Chassis
76 / 98 → 77%
Connectivity
66 / 81 → 82%
Weight
81%
Games Performance
25 / 80 → 31%
Application Performance
82 / 92 → 89%
Noise
78%
Average
40%
66%
Mini PC - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
75.5%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 39.6%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 微星 Cubi NUC M1 迷你 PC 评测:性能稳定,但价格高于竞争对手
Allen Ngo, 2024-11- 1 (Update: 2024-11- 1)