摩托罗拉 Edge 50 智能手机评测--当豪华功能遇上中端价格
无框的好
摩托罗拉 Edge 50 比上一代产品几乎没有什么变化,但屏幕更大,电池也更强劲。此外,它还拥有大量存储空间和高速的 6 GHz 无线局域网。这些都是好消息,但这款手机是否也有缺点呢?Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
78.6 % | v8 | 10 / 2024 | Motorola Edge 50 SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644 | 180 g | 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.70" | 2712x1220 | |
86.8 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Motorola Edge 40 Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9 | 171 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 | |
80.9 % | v8 | 09 / 2024 | OnePlus Nord 4 SD 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732 | 199.5 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.74" | 2772x1240 | |
81.9 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | Google Pixel 8a Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7 | 188 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.10" | 2400x1080 | |
87.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530 | 213 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2340x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
请注意:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.
外壳和连接 - 如果需要,可提供彩色外壳
摩托罗拉 Edge 50 属于摩托罗拉的高端系列,但售价仅为 600 美元左右,更像是介于高端和中端之间的产品。
边缘延伸的屏幕玻璃与摩托罗拉 Edge 50 和整个系列的名称相吻合,因为(几乎)所有设备都是这个样子。当然,这款中端手机并非完全无边框,但 93.1% 的屏占比仍然令人印象深刻。顶部和底部也只有窄边框。
除了别致的考拉灰,这款手机还有丛林绿和桃红两种鲜艳的配色。机身背面采用人造皮革或人造麂皮覆盖,质感极佳。
虽然这款手机比上一代略长,但与 6.7 英寸的屏幕相比,仍然相当小巧。此外,该机仅重 180 克,重量相对较轻。得益于其圆润的机身侧面,这款手机感觉超级纤薄,握持舒适。金属边框仅在顶部和底部边角略微突出,不会产生影响手感的边缘。
Edge 50 的结构非常稳定,既不会受到扭曲的影响,也不会受到强大压力的影响。它的屏幕由大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护,如果不小心将 Edge 50 掉入淡水中,也不必惊慌,因为它具有 IP68 级防尘防水保护。
遗憾的是,摩托罗拉安装了一个 USB 2.0 端口,因此数据传输只能以标准速度进行,镜像显示也只能通过无线方式实现。不过,它配备了用于移动支付的 NFC 功能。它只有一个 nano-SIM 卡插槽,但也可以存储 eSIM 配置文件。这意味着手机支持双卡双待。
通信和软件 - 边缘 50 快速无线局域网
摩托罗拉的智能手机采用 WiFi 6E,这意味着它也可以访问较少使用的 6 GHz 频率,进行无线局域网连接。这产生了良好的效果:在测试过程中,我们测得的接收速率超过 1,600 MBit/s。因此,您可以很好地使用千兆数据线,但只有在使用快速内部网络结构时,这样的速度才会真正令人感兴趣。
这款智能手机同样拥有良好的移动频率支持,包括足够多的 4G 和 5G 频率,使其可以在更远的地方访问网络。在测试过程中,我们反复随机测试了它的接收能力,并与高端智能手机进行了比较。摩托罗拉 Edge 50 表现出色,接收效果往往与更高端的设备不相上下。
这款智能手机可以通过卫星定位,我们骑着自行车对其定位能力的准确性进行了测定。Edge 50 的得分很高,只有极少数地方偏离了我们的实际路线,甚至没有受到信号较弱的狭窄老城区街道的干扰。总之,我们完全推荐 Edge 50 执行导航任务。
Edge 50 的操作系统基于Android 14,摩托罗拉对它的改动很小。所有内部功能都外包给了独立的应用程序,这样就可以在不需要全面更新系统的情况下保持更新。该系统预装了一些第三方应用程序,如社交网络或游戏。不过,它们可以轻松卸载。在测试时,最新的安全补丁是从 2024 年 8 月开始的,因此可以进行更新。
摩托罗拉的更新政策有些奇怪:价格更低的 Edge 50 Neo 有更多最新的安全补丁,而且应该在 5 年内接受更新,而 Edge 50 只有 3 年的更新承诺,而且会在Android 17 之前看到新的Android 版本。
Networking | |
Motorola Edge 50 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Motorola Edge 40 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
可持续发展和运营 - 除包装外,仍有一些工作要做
因此,我们对它的软件供应和设备的使用寿命并不热衷。从可持续发展的角度来看,它的包装还是不错的,因为它不含塑料,粘合剂是水性的,纸板部分主要由回收材料制成。
遗憾的是,没有关于这款智能手机在生命周期内二氧化碳消耗量的数据。摩托罗拉 Edge 智能手机也没有维修说明或用于自我维修的备件。
Edge 50 的 120Hz 显示屏每秒可扫描触控 360 次,因此操作速度非常快。机壳右侧的硬件按钮用于音量控制和待机。按键触感良好,按压点清晰。
指纹传感器隐藏在屏幕后面。它的位置相当靠下,即使是小手也能轻松触及。保存指纹后,就能可靠地识别指纹,并快速解锁手机。您也可以通过面部识别进入手机,即使在光线较暗的环境下,面部识别也能同样可靠地工作:屏幕可作为识别光源。
摄像头 - 即使在变焦时也功能强大
摩托罗拉在手机背面安装了三个功能齐全的摄像头传感器。主摄像头采用索尼的 5000 万像素传感器。它能拍摄出相当不错的照片,即使放大后也相当清晰。色彩鲜艳但不过分饱和,我们周围环境照片中的绚丽天空也没有压垮传感器。
在弱光和高对比度环境下,主摄像头在暗部的提亮效果可能会更好一些,但总体而言,清晰度不错,对这一困难场景的表现也很得体。主摄像头还必须在我们的测试实验室中证明自己:它在拍摄非常精细的结构时略显不足,而且在拍摄红色背景时对比度也不高。在光线非常暗的情况下,主体仍然可以辨认,但几乎没有变亮。
该相机最高可录制 30fps 的 4K 视频。自动对焦工作迅速,通常可以毫无疑问地依赖它。曝光补偿功能也很出色,而且在大多数情况下,其工作速度都足够快,不会让人感到不适。
此外,还安装了一个 1300 万像素广角摄像头。遗憾的是,在我们的测试中,它的成像并不清晰,照片的亮度也不高。它还配备了一个 1000 万像素的长焦镜头,并配有光学图像稳定器。由于采用了焦距更高的专用镜头,因此可以实现混合变焦,即使变焦率更高,效果也依然很好。
手机前置 3200 万像素摄像头,采用像素二进制工作方式,因此通常可拍摄 800 万像素的照片。这些照片的动态范围可以再大一些,但自拍照看起来仍然清晰、细节丰富。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low lightUltra-wide-angle camera显示屏 - 明亮、色彩准确
Edge 50 配备了一块 6.7 英寸 P-OLED 显示屏。在我们使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测试中,它的亮度与同价位的其他智能手机相近:在显示全白屏幕时,我们测得的亮度为 1,185 cd/m²,而在显示较小的摘录内容(APL 18)时,我们测得的亮度为 1,546 cd/m²。这意味着您可以在户外很好地使用这款手机,即使在光线较亮的日子里,屏幕内容仍然清晰可见。
在 "自然 "模式下,我们对其色彩还原几乎没有任何负面评价,肉眼也看不到偏色。这意味着,只要设置正确,就能很好地评估专业用途的屏幕色彩。
我们在低亮度下测得的闪烁频率为 397 赫兹,振幅为 22%。对于敏感人群来说,这可能是一个问题,他们在购买前一定要试用一下屏幕,以免出现问题。不过,摩托罗拉还采用了频率为 1626 Hz 的直流调光技术,可以减少闪烁现象。
|
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1164 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.213
Motorola Edge 50 P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Motorola Edge 40 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6" | OnePlus Nord 4 AMOLED, 2772x1240, 6.7" | Google Pixel 8a AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1" | Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -19% | -336% | -77% | -52% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.1 ? | 1.14 ? -4% | 10 ? -809% | 2.83 ? -157% | 1.53 ? -39% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1 ? | 0.89 ? 11% | 2.3 ? -130% | 1.05 ? -5% | 1.47 ? -47% |
PWM Frequency | 397 | 144 -64% | 119.2 -70% | 120 -70% | 120 -70% |
Screen | -22% | -12% | 8% | -3% | |
Brightness middle | 1164 | 1023 -12% | 1102 -5% | 1518 30% | 962 -17% |
Brightness | 1156 | 1042 -10% | 1102 -5% | 1466 27% | 967 -16% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 90 -5% | 94 -1% | 88 -7% | 99 4% |
Black Level * | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.14 | 1.6 -40% | 1.43 -25% | 1.2 -5% | 1.6 -40% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.46 | 4.3 -24% | 4.04 -17% | 3.3 5% | 2.6 25% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 2.8 -40% | 2.4 -20% | 2 -0% | 1.5 25% |
Gamma | 2.213 99% | 2.27 97% | 2.213 99% | 2.2 100% | 2.13 103% |
CCT | 6553 99% | 6457 101% | 6385 102% | 6786 96% | 6382 102% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -21% /
-21% | -174% /
-120% | -35% /
-20% | -28% /
-19% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5 ms rise | |
↘ 0.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5 ms rise | |
↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 397 Hz Amplitude: 22 % Secondary Frequency: 1626 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 397 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 397 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8684 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列
性能、排放和电池续航时间--本可以做得更多
高通骁龙 7 代 1作为手机的 SoC。它能确保系统在绝大多数情况下流畅运行,但在这个价位的手机中仍然相对较弱。 摩托罗拉 Edge 40)的 SoC,即 联发科 Dimensity 8020.
在图形性能方面,Edge 50 也略逊于同价位的设备,它更适合以 30fps 而不是 60fps 的速度玩游戏。此外,摩托罗拉还在存储方面做了一些节省,因为这款手机只使用了 UFS 2.2 存储,虽然容量很大,但速度相对较慢。
我们测量到,在长时间负载的情况下,手机外壳的温度会明显升高:室温下的温度高达 55.9 °C,这当然不是件令人愉快的事,而且温度显然过高;在炎热的夏天,温度会升至临界水平,导致设备关机。有趣的是,SoC 似乎并没有受到这些高温的影响,即使多次运行基准测试也没有出现节流现象。
底部边缘的扬声器由耳机支持,可实现轻微的立体声效果,使声音感觉更加饱满。总的来说,音质相当不错--音乐播放的声音相当响亮,即使在最高音量下也不会失真。不过,低音或中低音也不要期望太高。
外置扬声器或耳机可通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙连接。在我们的测试中,这两种连接方式都能正常工作。几乎支持目前所有的蓝牙音频编解码器,因此甚至可以使用更奇特的编解码器。
该手机的电池容量为 5000 毫安时,比上一代产品的电池容量大得多,但运行时间却略有改善:在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,16:06 小时的续航时间并不差,足以确保手机在中度使用情况下无需每天充电。其他智能手机,如 三星Galaxy A55 5G在电池容量相同的情况下,续航时间明显更长。
Edge 50 可以使用电缆以高达 68 瓦的功率充电。最长只需一个多小时就能再次充满 100%的电量。无线充电的功率可达 15 瓦,但您必须自备充电器,因为摩托罗拉不提供充电器。
Geekbench ML | |
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Average of class Smartphone (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
Average of class Smartphone (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years) |
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1 | |
Average of class Smartphone (122 - 4619, n=43, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 50 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 () | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1 | |
Average of class Smartphone (122 - 32432, n=43, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 50 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 () | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1 | |
Average of class Smartphone (118 - 44657, n=43, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 50 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 () | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G |
Motorola Edge 50 | Motorola Edge 40 | OnePlus Nord 4 | Google Pixel 8a | Samsung Galaxy A55 5G | Average 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 26% | 110% | -24% | 4% | -6% | 32% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1002.6 | 1876.88 87% | 3592.8 258% | 1509.65 51% | 1688.53 68% | 1054 ? 5% | 1873 ? 87% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 909.6 | 1587.93 75% | 2898.2 219% | 255.31 -72% | 831.44 -9% | 959 ? 5% | 1466 ? 61% |
Random Read 4KB | 296.6 | 235.66 -21% | 250.4 -16% | 165.98 -44% | 351.47 18% | 264 ? -11% | 277 ? -7% |
Random Write 4KB | 358.3 | 229.44 -36% | 276.2 -23% | 243.82 -32% | 132.11 -63% | 277 ? -23% | 309 ? -14% |
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.4 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.9 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Stress Test
发言人
Motorola Edge 50 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
运行时间
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G | |
Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus Nord 4 | |
Motorola Edge 50 | |
Motorola Edge 40 | |
Google Pixel 8a |
Pros
Cons
评语:Edge 50 性能不错,但 SoC 系统使其陷入困境
摩托罗拉 Edge 50 的设计和存储配置与更昂贵的手机相比毫不逊色。其中包括快速的 6 GHz Wi-Fi、大容量电池、强大的变焦摄像系统和无线充电功能。精确的定位服务和明亮的屏幕也很有趣。
即便如此,摩托罗拉还是在手机的 SoC 和内存模块上做了节省,你在使用 Edge 50 时就能真切地感受到:虽然大部分时间你都能流畅地浏览系统,但手机在使用更复杂的应用程序时就会出现问题,而且在运行要求较高的游戏时,几乎不可能达到 30fps 以上的速度。
同样令人费解的是,为什么摩托罗拉承诺为价格更低的 Edge 50 Neo 提供比价格更高的设备更长的更新时间。你只能在 3 年的标准期限内获得更新。此外,在可持续发展标准(如自我修复)方面,摩托罗拉仍有一些工作要做。
如果您正在寻找一款高品质的中端设备,而这款设备又不会与高端手机格格不入,那么摩托罗拉 Edge 50 将是您的不二之选。不过,它的性能并不是最高的。
如果您的智能手机需要更小巧一些,那么价格更低廉的 Edge 50 Neo-可能是一个不错的选择。三星 三星Galaxy A55 5G运行时间更长。
价格和供应情况
在撰写本文时,摩托罗拉 Edge 50 尚未在美国发售。
请注意:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.
Motorola Edge 50
- 10/18/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.