技嘉 G5 KF5 2024 笔记本电脑评测:RTX 4060 低价游戏--值得吗?
巨额优惠?
英特尔酷睿 i7-13620H、RTX 4060、16 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘,所有这些只需 899 欧元。目前,RTX 4060 游戏机的价格已经便宜得不能再便宜了。我们来看看最新的 G5 是否物有所值,是否能入选最超值游戏笔记本电脑榜单。Christian Hintze, 👁 Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论 - 冷却系统是问题所在
仅售 899 欧元的 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑有其吸引力,你可以接受 720p 网络摄像头、缺少 Thunderbolt 端口,甚至是稍高的噪音。G5 在某些方面也做得出人意料的好:精巧的设计令人愉悦,键盘坚固耐用,相当普通的显示屏色彩准确度高,CPU 性能略高于平均水平。
然而,散热系统并不尽如人意:如果 CPU 在游戏过程中持续达到 100 °C,这未必有利于硬件的耐用性。难怪这款笔记本电脑的噪音也相当大。这可能是我们测试机型的问题,但前代机型也曾遇到过温度问题。我们不明白技嘉为什么不在两代笔记本电脑之间修复这个薄弱环节。如果制造商发现我们的机型存在故障,我们将更新测试结果。
Pros
Cons
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
价格和供应情况
技嘉 G5 KF5 2024 的部分型号可在包括亚马逊在内的多家在线商店购买。
Price comparison
潜在的竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Geizhals | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 Intel Core i7-13620H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 2 kg | 22.7 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | ||
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 Intel Core i5-13450HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 2.4 kg | 23.9 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | ||
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 2.1 kg | 22.4 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | ||
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 Intel Core i7-14700HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 2.5 kg | 26.55 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | ||
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Listenpreis 1300 USD Geizhals Suche | 2.2 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
G5 系列是技嘉进军游戏笔记本电脑的经济型产品。与 前代相比,2024 型号升级到了英特尔 Gen13 Raptor Lake,即 酷睿 i7-13620H和 RTX 4060当然,16 GB 内存依然保留,固态硬盘容量则增加了一倍,达到 1 TB。它的价格仅为 899 欧元,甚至比上一代产品还要便宜,是该性能领域有史以来价格最低的产品之一。我们将测试目前的 G5 KF5 对于那些希望省钱的人来说是否有趣,或者它是否走了太多弯路。
除了前代产品外,我们还将该系统与其他经济型游戏笔记本电脑进行了比较,如 LOQ 15和 华硕 TUF Gaming A15 (2024)但由于缺乏替代品,我们还将其与更昂贵的设备进行了比较 联想Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9和 戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus 7640.
规格 - 酷睿 i7-13620H 和 RTX 4060,售价低于 900 欧元
外壳和功能铁灰色塑料外壳
当你试图扭动它时,底座会轻微裂开并发出噼啪声。盖子在调节时只会轻微晃动,最大可打开至 140 度。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
可持续性
虽然技嘉在运输 G5 时使用了纸板箱,但游戏笔记本电脑和电源装置仍用塑料袋包裹,并使用 Styrodur 材料防震。G5 显然没有使用回收材料,制造商也没有提供任何有关生产 G5 过程中二氧化碳排放量的信息。
输入设备 - G5 配有良好的输入设备
布局和标签与 G5 KE 略有不同,但与前代产品 G5 KF 一样,回车键更大,标签更薄、更清晰。布局清晰,即使没有背光也能轻松阅读。单区键盘照明可配置多种颜色,亮度可分四级调节。按压点适中,手感舒适,反馈良好。打字速度很快,噪音适中。
触摸板尺寸约为 12 x 7.2 厘米,具有良好的滑动性能,只有在非常缓慢的移动中才会稍有减弱。集成鼠标按键的点击噪音适中。
显示屏 - 配备锐利 FHD 显示屏的技嘉显示屏
技嘉更换了 G5 的显示屏。上一代 G5 机型使用的是奇美(Chi-Mei)面板,但我们的测试样品现在使用的是夏普(Sharp)的哑光全高清 IPS 屏幕,最大刷新率为 144 Hz。
屏幕的平均亮度略高于 300 尼特,在目前属于较低的范围。照明均匀度为 87%。
黑阶和对比度一般。面板切换像素的速度不会太快,但也不会特别慢。背光出血和 PWM 也不是问题。
主观地总结一下,就整体价格而言,我们拥有一款不错的显示器,它当然不是同类产品中最好的,但能可靠地完成工作。要想获得更高的分辨率、更鲜艳的色彩和对比度,以及其他面板技术(OLED、MiniLED),你就得掏更多的钱了。
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 342 cd/m²
Contrast: 1179:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.82
ΔE Greyscale 3.03 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
68.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.51
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 Sharp SHP153F (LQ156M1JW30), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 360 Hz | Gigabyte G5 KF Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 BOE NJ NE156FHM-NX9, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AU Optronics B156HAN15.H, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 BOE NE160QDM-NZB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 AU Optronics B160QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -35% | 5% | 3% | 25% | 8% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.9 | 43.2 -36% | 73.7 9% | 70.5 4% | 99.22 46% | 76 12% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.9 | 64.3 -35% | 99.1 0% | 98.5 0% | 99.93 1% | 99.8 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.8 | 44.7 -35% | 72.6 6% | 72.7 6% | 87.81 28% | 76.7 11% |
Response Times | -58% | -191% | -152% | 29% | -99% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 13 ? | 25.1 ? -93% | 42.2 ? -225% | 31.7 ? -144% | 4.8 ? 63% | 25.6 ? -97% |
Response Time Black / White * | 8.8 ? | 10.8 ? -23% | 22.6 ? -157% | 22.9 ? -160% | 9.2 ? -5% | 17.6 ? -100% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | -134% | -3% | -13% | -4% | 8% | |
Brightness middle | 342 | 297 -13% | 306 -11% | 315 -8% | 518 51% | 314.7 -8% |
Brightness | 308 | 275 -11% | 287 -7% | 303 -2% | 491 59% | 291 -6% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 85 -2% | 88 1% | 90 3% | 90 3% | 89 2% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.34 -17% | 0.21 28% | 0.25 14% | 0.36 -24% | 0.28 3% |
Contrast | 1179 | 874 -26% | 1457 24% | 1260 7% | 1439 22% | 1124 -5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.46 | 6.23 -153% | 2.25 9% | 2.26 8% | 4.32 -76% | 1.62 34% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.12 | 20.93 -408% | 4.84 -17% | 7.37 -79% | 6.37 -55% | 2.94 29% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.82 | 4.74 -478% | 1.45 -77% | 1.03 -26% | 0.75 9% | 1.08 -32% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.03 | 5.92 -95% | 2.4 21% | 4 -32% | 3.66 -21% | 1.3 57% |
Gamma | 2.51 88% | 2.49 88% | 2.259 97% | 2.116 104% | 2.19 100% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 7056 92% | 6279 104% | 6790 96% | 7570 86% | 6841 95% | 6385 102% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -76% /
-102% | -63% /
-28% | -54% /
-29% | 17% /
7% | -28% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
由于使用的是面板,在通常的色彩空间中,只有 sRGB 几乎完全覆盖,这当然不足为奇。
显示器的色彩和灰度在出厂时都很好,但通过 Xrite 色度计和 Calman 软件进行手动校准后,DeltaE 值可以显著降低,灰度偏差从 3.03 降至 0.71,ColorChecker 中的偏差从 2.46 降至 0.82。因此,只要 sRGB 色彩空间足够,该面板的色彩准确度相当高,甚至适用于轻度照片和视频编辑任务。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.6 ms rise | |
↘ 4.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.6 ms rise | |
↘ 6.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在室外,300 尼特的亮度并不理想,但也可以使用。应尽量避免阳光照射。
性能 - CPU 最高,GPU 最低
我们的 G5 KF5 配备了 英特尔酷睿 i7-13620H和 RTX 4060外加 16 GB DDR5 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘。G5 也有 MF5 型号,在这种情况下,性能较弱的 RTX 4050这似乎是唯一的区别。在这样的硬件组合下,G5 定位为经济型游戏玩家,也能处理一些轻量级的造物主任务。
测试条件
G5 预装了技嘉控制中心。该软件并不特别全面(没有 MUX 开关),而且我们很少看到如此像素化、缺乏吸引力的控制中心。至少,除了键盘设置外,我们还找到了四个性能配置文件(静音、省电、娱乐、性能)。我们选择性能模式进行基准测试,使用省电模式进行电池测试。由于尚不清楚这些模式与 Windows 电源模式之间的相互作用或影响,我们也将 Windows 设置为性能模式(电池测试中为节能模式)。
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿 i7-13620H是一款用于笔记本电脑的高端 CPU,拥有 6 个 P 核心和 4 个 E 核心,共 16 个线程,时钟频率为 1.8(基本时钟 E 核心)至 4.9 GHz(单核心涡轮增压 P 核心)。集成了英特尔 Xe 图形处理器,96 个 EU 中只有64 个。.
在我们的 Cinebench R15 耐用性测试中,前四次运行的分数仅略有下降,之后性能保持不变。总体而言,G5 处理器的性能略高于我们数据库中采用相同 CPU 的普通笔记本电脑,甚至超过了 酷睿 i5-13450HX在 LOQ 15.与前代产品相比,CPU 的性能提高了 21%。
在电池模式下,Cinebench R15 的性能下降了约 35%。
Cinebench R15/模式 | 性能 | 娱乐 | 静音 | 节能 | 电池 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
得分 | 2,396 | 2,296 | 840 | 768 | 1,555 |
TDP | 最初为 93 W,随着时间推移降至 65 W | 最初为 85 W,后来短暂降至 65 W,然后为 45 W | 最初为 28 W,后来为 20 W,然后为 15 W | 15 W | 36 W |
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (10819 - 15496, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (1805 - 1871, n=5) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (4214 - 5905, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (693 - 719, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (1681 - 2492, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (258 - 269, n=5) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (215 - 289, n=5) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (45983 - 62324, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (5742 - 6326, n=5) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=110, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (9131 - 13077, n=4) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=110, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (2544 - 2605, n=4) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (8357 - 12223, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (1793 - 1865, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (12.9 - 17.7, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (41.5 - 56.8, n=5) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (0.4438 - 0.4509, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (10779 - 13601, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (54287 - 67187, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (2357 - 2773, n=5) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (66885 - 78867, n=5) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (6737 - 8421, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (27242 - 32787, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (52697 - 85895, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (697 - 835, n=5) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (6077 - 7364, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (22766 - 34544, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
系统性能
G5 在 PCMark 10 中的成绩并不突出,处于中游水平。在 CrossMark 中,我们的技嘉几乎达到了预期水平。在 Windows 模式下,我们很少发现任何问题,只有在滚动浏览浏览器时才会出现一些小插曲。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (6678 - 7256, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9909 - 10809, n=3) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (8642 - 9781, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9437 - 10204, n=3) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1857 - 1986, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1765 - 1908, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2013 - 2067, n=3) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1734 - 1989, n=3) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (292 - 319, n=3) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=165, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=153, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (508 - 516, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 779, n=179, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7256 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (38066 - 53927, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (40342 - 61853, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (38595 - 54111, n=5) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13620H (75.9 - 108.2, n=5) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
即使在启动 LatencyMon 后移动鼠标指针,也会检测到较高的延迟,而且每执行一项新操作(打开浏览器、打开多个标签页、播放视频),延迟都会增加。我们的 YouTube 视频也出现了两帧丢失。总体而言,延迟值明显过高,即使是与之相比也是如此。播放 YouTube 视频时,iGPU 负载高达 89%,这一点也很明显。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
在我们的测试样本中,制造商使用的是自家技嘉品牌的 1 TB 内存 NVMe SSD。它的连续传输速率为 4000 至 5000 MB/s。这意味着,它的速度通常比这里列出的竞争对手还要略快一些。
不过,在第 16 次 DiskSpd 通过后的耐用性测试中,由于热节流,它无法保持这一性能。在此之后,性能波动很大,并一再急剧下降。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形
......(英文 RTX 4060 在 G5 中,允许的最大 TGP 为 75 W,这是一个相当平均的值。这可能也是 G5 在合成 3D 基准测试中令人失望的原因。只有在不再支持的Cloud Gate 测试中,G5 才取得了出乎意料的好成绩。它的其他成绩更多反映了其前代产品的情况,比我们数据库中配备 RTX 4060 的普通笔记本电脑差 6%左右。除了 戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 之外, 所有竞争对手的速度都更快,尤其是Legion 5 Pro,至少如果排除Cloud Gate 测试的话。
游戏方面的情况也差不多:G5 在 CPU 密集型游戏中的表现依然出色,但在 GPU 密集型游戏中却无法与竞争对手匹敌。此外,与其他大多数笔记本电脑不同的是,我们的《赛博朋克 2077》耐久性测试显示帧速率随着时间的推移持续下降。这种不稳定的行为表明散热系统消耗过大,固态硬盘节流也是一个迹象,下文将对此进行详细介绍。尽管性能相对较弱,但使用 G5 中的 RTX 4060,你几乎可以在全高清模式下以中等至最高细节玩任何游戏。
在电池模式下,再运行Fire Strike 时,3D 性能会损失整整 73%。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV -1! | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 -1! | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 -1! |
3DMark 11 Performance | 29001 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 58918 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 20767 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 9497 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 -1! | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 -1! |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (21.2 - 208, n=44, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 186.4 | 181.2 | 170.6 | 102.4 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 188.7 | 172.3 | 164.9 | 154.5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 187.2 | 129.6 | 93.2 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 159.3 | 131.1 | 102 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 441 | 253 | 192.3 | 170.8 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 125 | 98 | 86 | 84 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 114 | 91 | 77.2 | 68.2 |
排放与能源 - 冷却系统超载
噪音排放
在性能模式下,风扇经常开启,噪音约为 27.87 分贝。在我们的 3dMark06 测试中,风扇长时间保持在这一水平,但在结束前不久又升至 54.82 分贝的最高转速,我们在 Cyberpoint 2077 或压力测试中也测得了这一数值。前代产品的噪音也是如此之大,而直接竞争对手Legion Pro 5 的噪音则更小一些,至少达到了类似的水平,但也比我们的 G5 表现更好。
此外,在重 3D 负载情况下,我们的测试机型发出的巨大咔嗒声令人不安。似乎内部有什么东西在周期性地(约 2 - 3 Hz)撞击外壳,给人留下不好的印象。如果我们举起笔记本电脑并改变其在手中的位置,噪音会发生变化,也可能完全消失。如果再次放下,噪音通常又会出现。对于维修部分,我们在发现这些问题后才打开外壳,但未能发现任何松动的部件。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 27.87 dB(A) |
Load |
| 54.82 / 54.82 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI | Gigabyte G5 KF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, SSSTC CA6-8D512 | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13450HX, Micron 2400 MTFDKCD1T0QFM | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 7% | -9% | 1% | 5% | 9% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 23 -0% | 25 -9% | 25 -9% | 23 -0% | 23.8 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 23 -0% | 26 -13% | 25 -9% | 23 -0% | 24.2 -5% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 23 -0% | 34 -48% | 27 -17% | 23 -0% | 24.2 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.87 | 28 -0% | 36 -29% | 33 -18% | 25 10% | 24.2 13% |
Load Average * | 54.82 | 29.94 45% | 48 12% | 40 27% | 45.18 18% | 28.9 47% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 54.82 | 48 12% | 45 18% | 52.69 4% | ||
Load Maximum * | 54.82 | 55.5 -1% | 50 9% | 46 16% | 53.13 3% | 51 7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 55.05 | 51 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
尽管风扇的声音很大,但表面温度却不低。我们在底部测得的热点温度高达 67 °C,位于显示屏的中央位置。这对我们来说有点过高。遗憾的是,技嘉未能对同样发热的前代产品进行优化。
在压力测试和游戏测试中,GPU 的温度都上升到了 88 °C。CPU 的温度甚至更糟:在压力测试中,CPU 的温度已经在 76 - 82 °C之间,而在游戏中,CPU 的温度持续上升到 100 °C,而且没有进一步下降。这对于硬件的耐用性来说并不理想!同时,这也是上图《赛博朋克 2077》中帧数持续下降的原因。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 66 °C / 151 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte G5 KF Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -1% | 5% | 8% | -1% | 15% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 50 | 54 -8% | 47 6% | 53 -6% | 50 -0% | 43.4 13% |
Maximum Bottom * | 66 | 61 8% | 58 12% | 46 30% | 57 14% | 41.6 37% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 34 -6% | 32 -0% | 32 -0% | 36 -13% | 32.8 -3% |
Idle Bottom * | 37 | 36 3% | 36 3% | 34 8% | 39 -5% | 32.4 12% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个立体声扬声器位于正面两侧,向下辐射。它们的声音不是特别大,低音不足,但高音很线性。我们建议在游戏时将耳机连接到音频插孔。
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
在节能模式下,闲置功耗仅为 5.2 瓦。然而,在其他性能模式下,功耗骤增至 20 瓦左右。
在游戏(赛博朋克 2077)中,我们测得的平均功耗为 144 瓦。小型电源装置(约 13.6 x 6.7 x 2.3 厘米(长 x 宽 x 高))的设计功率为 150 W,应能应付所有测得的平均耗电量并吸收短时峰值。不过,在要求苛刻的游戏过程中,留给充电的空间并不多。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 1 Watt |
Idle | 5.2 / 19.6 / 23 Watt |
Load |
84 / 165 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Energieaufnahme Cyberpunk / Stresstest
Power consumption with the external monitor
电池寿命
仅 54 Wh 的电池容量也反映了其低廉的价格。同类产品的电池容量在 60 到 90 Wh 之间。尽管如此,我们的 G5 在电池续航时间方面表现不俗,尤其是与 LOQ 15(60 Wh)和Legion Pro 5(80 Wh)相比,它甚至可以实现更好的 WiFi(5.5 至 7 小时)和视频运行时间(6 小时)。
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh | Gigabyte G5 KF i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 60 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -3% | -26% | 61% | 6% | 84% | 10% | |
H.264 | 363 | 268 -26% | 312 -14% | 408 ? 12% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 435 | 316 -27% | 320 -26% | 702 61% | 308 -29% | 799 84% | 376 ? -14% |
Load | 65 | 94 45% | 105 62% | 85.3 ? 31% | |||
Reader / Idle | 514 | 565 ? |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
899 欧元的 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑:尽管技嘉 G5 在 720p 网络摄像头和缺少 Thunderbolt 端口等方面有所妥协,但其扎实的设计、良好的键盘和高色彩准确度的显示屏还是给人留下了深刻印象。不过,它的散热系统似乎过于薄弱,因此我们不推荐购买。
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024
- 10/17/2024 v8
Christian Hintze
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.