Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar华硕 TUF Gaming A15 (2024) 评测：RTX 4060 性能强劲、价格适中、电池续航时间长
"TUF游戏 "是低端价格游戏笔记本电脑的代名词：Ryzen 9 8945H、GeForce RTX 4060、16 GB 内存、512 GB 固态硬盘和1399 美元左右的价格，构成了一款经济实惠的中端游戏笔记本电脑。竞争产品包括 联想 LOQ 15IRX9和 技嘉 G6X 9KG (2024)、戴尔 戴尔 G16戴尔 XMG Core 15 (M24)和 惠普 Victus 16 (2024).
这与去年的姊妹机型 我们去年评测过的 A15.主要区别在于从 Ryzen 7000 升级到了 Ryzen 8000。
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H 8 x 4 - 5.2 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1890 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 32.0.15.5612, Advanced Optimus + MUX-Switch
Memory
16 GB
, DDR5-5600, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN15.H, IPS, G-Sync, glossy: no, 144 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, 1024 GB
, PCIe 4, M.2 2280, 858 GB free
Weight
2.122 kg, Power Supply: 724 g
Price
1199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.3 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 22.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 79 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.3 % | v7 (old) | 05/2024 | HP Victus 16 (2024) i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.9 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.2 % | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 25.1 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 83.7 % | v8 | 06/2024 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 21.9 mm | 15.30" | 2560x1600 | |
| 85.5 % | v7 (old) | 02/2024 | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 25.65 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
机箱和功能 - 华硕 TUF 和 USB 4
灰色（机甲灰）、哑光、光滑表面的机身已在去年的 A15 中广为人知。 去年的 A15.底座（塑料）和盖子（金属后部）的扭转角度在可接受的范围内，没有稳定性问题。盖子的最大开启角度约为 130 度。
大部分端口都位于电脑左侧。其中包括两个 USB-A 端口（USB 3.2 Gen 1）和两个 USB-C 接口（1 个 USB 3.2 Gen 2、1 个 USB 4）。后者支持 DisplayPort Alt 模式，此外，USB 3.2 端口还提供 Power Delivery 功能。这意味着 TUF 有三个视频输出接口（1 个 HDMI 接口，2 个 DP 接口）。网络摄像头（0.9MP，无快门）拍摄的图像不会获奖。A15 没有配备存储卡读卡器。
华硕电脑加入了使用 Realtek RTL8852BE 芯片（WiFi 6）的入门级笔记本电脑行列。该无线芯片的传输速度尚可，但未能发挥其潜力，也无法达到英特尔竞争模块的速度。千兆以太网控制器（Realtek RTL8168/8111）负责有线连接。
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø806 (513-843)
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø830 (747-873)
HP Victus 16 (2024) Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø776 (487-929)
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1336 (789-1521)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1189 (557-1301)
Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø985 (902-1065)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø956 (936-974)
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø974 (950-986)
HP Victus 16 (2024) Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø978 (960-990)
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1683 (1630-1706)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1411 (616-1532)
Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø916 (797-933)
8.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
可持续性
笔记本电脑包装盒内大部分是纸板，没有太多塑料。笔记本电脑装在一个塑料纤维袋中，里面有一个透明的外壳，可以保护 PSU 免受划伤。最后，但并非最不重要的是，还有一个保护显示屏免受划伤的内衬。在所有三种情况下，都指定使用塑料。
由于底板可拆卸，因此维修起来应该很方便--整个硬件都可以拆卸。我们在设备内部没有发现任何粘贴的痕迹。软件更新在未来几年应该不成问题。笔记本电脑本身拥有EPEAT 铜牌标签。.
输入设备 - A15 具有小方向键
华硕将整个设备的宽度都用于背光 Chiclet 键盘（RGB），这意味着有空间放置数字键盘。平滑的键盘键程适中，按压点明显。按键阻力适中。键入时，键盘不会弯曲。值得注意的是，方向键和 "回车 "键较小，控制键（W、A、S、D）的颜色不同。多点触摸点击板（约 13 x 7.7 厘米）的行程较短，压力点明显，可作为替代鼠标使用。
显示屏 - 板载 IPS
华硕为该设备配备了一块 16:9、15.6 英寸哑光显示屏（FHD、IPS、144 Hz、G-Sync），可视角度稳定。在亮度和对比度方面，该面板虽然没有达到同类最佳水平，但仍能发挥其应有的作用，这就注定了它适合在室内使用。除强光外，在任何条件下都可以进行户外阅读。我们无法检测到任何 PWM 闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B156HAN15.H tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 317 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 303.3 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 315 cd/m²
Contrast: 1260:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95, calibrated: 1.03
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.116
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AU Optronics B156HAN15.H, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 BOE NJ NE156FHM-NX9, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Victus 16 (2024) Chi Mei CMN163E, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) BOE NE160WUM-NX6, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1 (BOE0C8E), IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3" | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 Chi Mei CMN161D (160GME), IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus TUF A15 FA507 N156HMA-GA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | -40% | -39% | 3% | -3% | -6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 70.5 | 73.7 5% | 41.3 -41% | 41.8 -41% | 73.2 4% | 67.5 -4% | 64.9 -8% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.5 | 99.1 1% | 61.7 -37% | 62.4 -37% | 100 2% | 98.5 0% | 96.5 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.7 | 72.6 0% | 42.7 -41% | 43.3 -40% | 74.6 3% | 69.3 -5% | 66.6 -8% |
| Response Times | -16% | 14% | -11% | 65% | 66% | 7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 31.7 ? | 42.2 ? -33% | 28.6 ? 10% | 40.5 ? -28% | 9.6 ? 70% | 7.6 ? 76% | 30.4 ? 4% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 22.9 ? | 22.6 ? 1% | 18.7 ? 18% | 21.6 ? 6% | 9.2 ? 60% | 10.4 ? 55% | 20.8 ? 9% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||||
| Screen | 6% | -62% | -54% | 14% | -9% | 18% | |
| Brightness middle | 315 | 306 -3% | 287 -9% | 353 12% | 635 102% | 369 17% | 288 -9% |
| Brightness | 303 | 287 -5% | 288 -5% | 318 5% | 604 99% | 344 14% | 271 -11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 88 -2% | 86 -4% | 81 -10% | 91 1% | 89 -1% | 91 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.21 16% | 0.19 24% | 0.21 16% | 0.64 -156% | 0.26 -4% | 0.17 32% |
| Contrast | 1260 | 1457 16% | 1511 20% | 1681 33% | 992 -21% | 1419 13% | 1694 34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.26 | 2.25 -0% | 5.46 -142% | 5.21 -131% | 1.89 16% | 3.04 -35% | 1.9 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.37 | 4.84 34% | 20.36 -176% | 19.95 -171% | 3.14 57% | 5.56 25% | 3.3 55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.03 | 1.45 -41% | 3.52 -242% | 3.61 -250% | 1.14 -11% | 2.35 -128% | 0.9 13% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 2.4 40% | 4.8 -20% | 3.6 10% | 2.53 37% | 3.38 15% | 2.7 32% |
| Gamma | 2.116 104% | 2.259 97% | 2.108 104% | 2.367 93% | 2.36 93% | 2.47 89% | 2.32 95% |
| CCT | 7570 86% | 6790 96% | 6442 101% | 7138 91% | 6434 101% | 6040 108% | 6535 99% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
2% | -29% /
-46% | -35% /
-45% | 27% /
19% | 18% /
3% | 6% /
11% |
* ... smaller is better
开箱即用的面板色彩偏差非常低，约为 2.26（目标：DeltaE < 3）。校准后，这一数字降至 1.03。与大多数同类产品的屏幕一样，这款面板几乎完全覆盖了 sRGB 色彩空间，但没有覆盖 AdobeRGB 和 DCI P3 色彩空间。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 31.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17373 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - Hawk Point 和 Ada Lovelace 为计算机提供动力
华硕推出的 TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV 是一款低价位的中端游戏笔记本电脑。计算任务所需的硬件来自 AMD（Hawk Point、Zen 4）和 Nvidia（Ada Lovelace）。评测设备的价格约为 1,399 美元。
测试条件
笔记本电脑有三个制造商特定的性能配置文件（见表），可通过 "Fn "+"F5 "组合键进行切换。我们使用了 "性能"（基准测试）和 "安静"（电池测试）配置文件。GPU 模式设置为 "标准"。笔记本的控制中心（"Armoury Crate"）允许您设置自定义配置文件（"Manual"）以及定义功率限制、动态提升和风扇曲线。
| 性能 | Turbo | 静音 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 功率限制 1 (HWInfo) | 70 瓦 | 80 瓦 | 54 瓦 |
| 功率限制 2 (HWInfo) | 80 瓦 | 80 瓦 | 65 瓦 |
| 噪音（CP 2077 Phantom） | 45 dB(A) | 56 dB(A) | 41 dB(A) |
| 性能（CP 2077 Phantom） | 64fps | 70fps | 56fps |
处理器
Ryzen 9 8945H(Hawk Point, Zen 4) 提供八个 CPU 内核，共 16 个线程，最高主频为 5.25 GHz（一个内核）。CPU 以持续的高涡轮增压速度应对持续的多线程负载（CB15 循环）。CPU 性能随所选能耗曲线的变化而变化，但差异很小。基准测试结果与类似规格的 Ryzen 9 8945HSAPU
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H: Ø2688 (2638-2777.2)
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 Intel Core i5-13450HX: Ø2170 (2104.93-2503.76)
HP Victus 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX: Ø2658 (2509.88-3812.18)
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) Intel Core i7-13650HX: Ø2018 (1801.23-2863.69)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2849 (2832.66-2908.03)
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 Intel Core i7-13650HX: Ø2933 (2802.3-3015.45)
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2219 (2188.66-2273.89)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H; Turbo: Ø2742 (2715.55-2819.15)
CPU Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 6.2 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
| CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 -2! | |
| Cinebench R20 | |
| CPU (Multi Core) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=205, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (Turbo) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (6153 - 6956, n=3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| CPU (Single Core) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Average of class Gaming (439 - 855, n=205, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (638 - 703, n=3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (Turbo) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=211, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (Turbo) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (2521 - 2819, n=4) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (283 - 284, n=3) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (Turbo) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=208, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (178 - 206, n=3) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (Turbo) | |
| Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=200, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Geekbench 6.2 | |
| Multi-Core | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.2.1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (6.2.1) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (6.2.1) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (6.2.1) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (12638 - 13162, n=3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (6.2.1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (6.2.1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (6.2.1 Turbo) | |
| Single-Core | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (6.2.1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (6.2.1, Turbo) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (6.2.1) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (2651 - 2711, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (6.2.1) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (6.2.1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (6.2.1) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.2.1) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=204, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (Turbo) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (20.6 - 22.4, n=3) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (6.3.4.2) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.3.4.2) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (6.3.4.2) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (6.3.4.2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (6.3.4.2) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (44.2 - 49.8, n=3) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (6.3.4.2, Turbo) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (6.3.4.2) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (24531 - 29423, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (106518 - 125008, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (4684 - 5209, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (114586 - 125950, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (41257 - 200651, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (14631 - 15889, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (3925 - 32988, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 (v6.85.6300) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (56505 - 67020, n=3) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (90481 - 163032, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (269 - 2409, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (976 - 1164, n=3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 (v6.85.6300) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (13609 - 15727, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=202, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (33327 - 40114, n=3) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 (v6.85.6300) | |
系统性能
运行流畅的系统为渲染、流媒体和游戏提供了充足的动力--良好的 PC Mark 测试结果证实了这一点。内存的传输速度达到了 DDR5 5600 内存的正常水平。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Average of class Gaming (5442 - 9852, n=180, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Average of class Gaming (8829 - 12334, n=179, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=179, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=179, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=181, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (421 - 737, n=193, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7943 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (61823 - 68924, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (61624 - 61810, n=3) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (78716 - 87138, n=3) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945H (91.4 - 92.6, n=3) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
延迟测试（上网、4K 视频播放、Prime95 高负载）未发现异常。该系统似乎非常适合实时视频和音频编辑。未来的软件更新可能会改善或恶化这方面的问题。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
A15 内部可容纳两个 PCIe 4 固态硬盘（M.2 2280），安装了一个固态硬盘：西部数据存储设备（1 TB，M.2 2280）提供了良好的数据传输速度，但不属于顶级固态硬盘型号。在 DiskSpd 循环的后期，我们观察到了热引起的节流。
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
4945 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
3244 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
803.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
671.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
3281 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
3229 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
55.92 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
125.1 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4300 (3774.46-4795.98)
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 Micron 2400 MTFDKCD1T0QFM; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3364 (2261.87-4608.28)
HP Victus 16 (2024) Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5625 (4912.19-6954.3)
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5086 (4094.28-5122.29)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7120 (6339.48-7142.87)
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2397 (880.89-5167.17)
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø4012 (3504.22-4030.94)
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø4012 (3504.22-4030.94)
图形卡
......（英文 GeForce RTX 4060(3,072 个着色器、128 位总线、8 GB GDDR6、140 瓦）专为高至最高设置下的全高清游戏而设计。基准测试成绩和帧速率与 RTX 4060 的平均水平（"性能"）相当。在某些情况下，"Turbo "配置文件只能带来最低限度的提升。在 dGPU 和 Optimus 之间切换无需重启：支持高级 Optimus。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=200, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (Turbo) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (28136 - 38912, n=51) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (Turbo) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (20533 - 29656, n=48) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=206, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (Turbo) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (7484 - 11451, n=50) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 55024 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 31639 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 25032 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 10402 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2200 points | |
Help | ||
| Geekbench 6.2 | |
| GPU OpenCL | |
| Average of class Gaming (4321 - 207373, n=104, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (6.2.1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (6.2.1) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.2.1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (6.2.1 Turbo) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (6.2.1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (6.2.1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (6.2.1) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (4321 - 100831, n=34) | |
| GPU Vulkan 6.2 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (6.2.1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (6.2.1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (6.2.1 Turbo) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (6.2.1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (6.2.1) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (6.2.1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4286 - 196201, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (4286 - 101001, n=33) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (6.2.1) | |
| V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 | |
| GPU | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=161, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v4.10.07, Turbo) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (483 - 715, n=40) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 (v4.10.07 ) | |
| CPU | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Average of class Gaming (5413 - 37629, n=161, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (12680 - 32360, n=40) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v4.10.07, Turbo) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 (v4.10.07 ) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 -1! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (2.12) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (2.12) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (2.12, Turbo) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (56.7 - 93.1, n=25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (2.02) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (2.11) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (2.02) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (2.02) | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (76.9 - 124.9, n=42) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (Turbo) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=197, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (1.3) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (1.3, Turbo) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (1.3) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (1.3) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (1.3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (1.3) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (1.3) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (75.1 - 109.8, n=45) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 (1.3) | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=196, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Turbo) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (135.3 - 210, n=46) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 220, n=205, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (115 - 183.8, n=47) | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (Turbo) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
| Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=211, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (66.5 - 141.1, n=48) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (Turbo) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 | F1 24 | The First Descendant | Ghost of Tsushima | Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 | Dragon's Dogma 2
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 208, n=39, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (66.5 - 105.5, n=13) | |
| F1 24 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (54.1 - 127, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (54.1 - 60.9, n=6) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (1126333) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 (1122588) | |
| The First Descendant - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (67.6 - 69.4, n=3) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average of class Gaming (15.4 - 80, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Ghost of Tsushima - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (55.6 - 63.4, n=5) | |
| Average of class Gaming (28.5 - 73.7, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 - 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (38.4 - 78.8, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (37.6 - 39.5, n=3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Dragon's Dogma 2 - 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (49.5 - 80, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (57.2 - 67.7, n=5) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø66.8 (63.8-67.8)
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø65.1 (61.4-65.8)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Turbo: Ø69.7 (66.5-70.3)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Leise: Ø56.5 (52.5-62)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
| GTA V (2015) | 182.6 | 177 | 168 | 107.2 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 171.5 | 154.9 | 149.3 | 139.5 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 210 | 138.8 | 100.7 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 135.3 | 117.5 | 91.7 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 360 | 263 | 213 | 184.2 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 135 | 107.8 | 95.9 | 93.9 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 122.2 | 96.6 | 82.7 | 76.2 |
| Alone in the Dark (2024) | 159.1 | 150.1 | 143.8 | 126.9 |
| Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) | 68.1 | 59.9 | ||
| Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 94.1 | 83.9 | 76.9 | 62.1 |
| Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 66.1 | 55.1 | 39.5 | |
| F1 24 (2024) | 220 | 205 | 169.7 | 56.6 |
| The First Descendant (2024) | 155.5 | 96.8 | 79.1 | 67.6 |
排放与能源 - 电池续航能力极强的游戏笔记本电脑
噪音排放
我们对 A15 产生的噪音既不感到惊讶，也不感到意外。赛博朋克 2077》导致噪音水平上升到明显可闻的 45 dB(A)（"高性能"）和非常响亮的 56 dB(A)（"涡轮增压"）。而 "静音 "模式的噪音水平适中，但帧数仍可正常播放。在日常情况下（办公室、网络），两个风扇经常低速运转，偶尔会静止不动。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25 / 27 / 33 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 40 / 46 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13450HX, Micron 2400 MTFDKCD1T0QFM | HP Victus 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G | Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -11% | -6% | -16% | 5% | 12% | 15% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 25 -0% | 25 -0% | 26 -4% | 23 8% | 23 8% | 23.3 7% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 26 -4% | 28 -12% | 30 -20% | 23 8% | 23 8% | 23.3 7% |
| Idle Average * | 27 | 34 -26% | 29 -7% | 32 -19% | 23 15% | 23 15% | 23.3 14% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33 | 36 -9% | 33 -0% | 35 -6% | 23 30% | 27.96 15% | 23.3 29% |
| Load Average * | 40 | 48 -20% | 45 -13% | 51 -28% | 38.92 3% | 27.96 30% | 29.6 26% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 45 | 48 -7% | 52.06 -16% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 46 | 50 -9% | 48 -4% | 54 -17% | 52.09 -13% | 47.89 -4% | 43 7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43 | 51 | 50.96 | 47.89 | 43 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
笔记本电脑明显发热：赛博朋克和压力测试导致某些区域的温度超过 50 摄氏度。在日常使用情况下（办公、上网），温度高于平均水平。手枕温度适中。
极端情况下的压力测试（Prime95 和 Furmark 连续运行）检查了系统在满负荷情况下的稳定性。最初较高的 CPU 和 GPU 时钟速度在测试的第一分钟分别降至 3.5 GHz（CPU）和 1.9 GHz（GPU），并持续保持在这一水平。
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 Intel Core i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -5% | 11% | 5% | -14% | -8% | 11% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 53 | 47 11% | 50 6% | 41 23% | 52 2% | 49 8% | 48.9 8% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 46 | 58 -26% | 50 -9% | 43 7% | 61 -33% | 58 -26% | 44.6 3% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 32 -0% | 25 22% | 32 -0% | 35 -9% | 35 -9% | 27.1 15% |
| Idle Bottom * | 34 | 36 -6% | 26 24% | 37 -9% | 39 -15% | 35 -3% | 27.5 19% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
总之，立体声扬声器能产生不错的音效。低音还可以更明显一些。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
在功耗方面，没有什么奇怪的地方。对于已安装的硬件而言，耗电量处于正常水平。赛博朋克和稍后的压力测试的耗电量都很稳定。电源适配器（240 瓦）大小合适。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / Watt |
| Idle | 7 / 12 / 18 Watt |
| Load |
70 / 206 Watt |
   
| |
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø153.8 (147.7-186.7)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø11.7 (7-17.8)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø146.8 (141.2-159)
Power consumption with an extrnal monitor
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø107.5 (105.2-112.6)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø101.2 (98.9-107.5)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø134.3 (124.8-157.9)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø19.8 (12.6-29.6)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø146.2 (137.2-155.6)
电池寿命
在实际的 Wi-Fi 测试中，这款 15.6 英寸设备的运行时间达到了 11 小时 42 分钟（访问运行脚本的网站时的负载图像），这是一个非常出色的数字。这使它与 去年的 A15 机型.
Pros
+ 雾面 FHD 显示屏（144 Hz）
+ 两个固态硬盘插槽（PCIe 4、M.2 2280）
+ 可更换/扩展内存
+ USB 4
+ 电源交付
+ 出色的电池寿命
Cons
- 在负载情况下偶尔会发出响声
- 温度高于平均水平
- 无读卡器
评价：游戏全能王
该设备主要用于 FHD 游戏，但在渲染和流媒体播放方面也没有任何问题。 Ryzen 9 8945H和 GeForce RTX 4060提供了必要的动力，而且这两款芯片都能以稳定的高时钟速度运行。安装的 15.6 英寸面板（FHD、144 Hz、G-Sync、sRGB）没有严重弱点。
通过 TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV，华硕推出了一款全面的 FHD 游戏笔记本电脑，其电池续航能力令人印象深刻。
在某些地方，电脑会明显发热，而且声音很大。选择该模式会让你在性能和噪音之间取得良好的折衷，由此造成的性能损失并不明显。
A15 的亮点在于其超长的电池续航时间：近 12 小时的实际续航时间通常是办公笔记本或超极本的专利。可以通过 USB-C PSU 为电池供电--两个 USB-C 端口（USB 3.2 Gen 2、USB 4）中的一个支持 Power Delivery，这意味着你不一定非得随身携带专有的 PSU。
一个替代方案是 联想 LOQ 15IRX9.它的计算能力略低，不支持 USB 4，电池续航时间也差很多。不过，在价格方面，它确实占了上风：LOQ 仅售 999 美元。
价格和供应情况
华硕 TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV 目前（截至 17.07.24）在亚马逊的售价约为 1,399 美元（512 GB SSD）。
注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV
-
07/17/2024 v8
Sascha Mölck
Gaming - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Price comparison
