联想Legion Pro 5i 笔记本电脑评测:超强 i7-14700HX 和 RTX 4060 性能
我们已经测试了其中一款配置较高的产品,它配备了 酷睿 i9 14900HX CPU和 140 瓦GeForce RTX 4070.不过,很多玩家可能会选择价格更实惠的配置,即 i7 14700HX 处理器。 i7 14700HX和 RTX 4060的配置。这款机型也可能会让人看到 "大 "机型的一些弱点,如表面温度过高和散热系统噪音过大。
除了它的 大哥和 非专业Legion 5,我们将把Legion Pro 5 与其他 RTX 4060 游戏机进行比较,如 戴尔 G16, 惠普 Victus 16和 XMG Core 15.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Version | Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
v8 | 82.3 % | 07/2024 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26.55 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
v7 (old) | 84.3 % | 05/2024 | HP Victus 16 (2024) i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.9 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
v7 (old) | 85.5 % | 02/2024 | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 25.65 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
v8 | 83.7 % | 06/2024 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 21.9 mm | 15.30" | 2560x1600 | |
v7 (old) | 89.3 % | 04/2024 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26.95 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
v7 (old) | 89.1 % | 02/2024 | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 25.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
请注意:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.
输入设备 - 享誉全球的Legion 质量
我们在第一次 Legion Pro 5i:它的刷新率可通过 Fn + R 组合键在三档(240、165 和 60 Hz)之间切换。
显示屏 -Legion Pro 也适用于内容创作者
联想在这款笔记本电脑上安装了一块 2560 x 1600 像素的哑光 IPS 显示屏。不过,有三种显示屏可供选择,分辨率均相同。入门级型号覆盖 sRGB,刷新率为 165 Hz,亮度为 300 nits。另外两款亮度为 500 尼特,刷新率为 240 赫兹,其中一款还支持 DCI-P3。我们的测试机型采用了其中一款刷新率为 240 Hz 的 500 尼特显示器。
我们测得的平均亮度为 491 尼特,照度为 90%,亮度不错。不过,它的黑阶还可以更好一些,但对比度还不错。
我们测得的亮度为 150 尼特,亮度约为 58%。它不使用 PWM,因此不会出现屏幕出血问题,其响应时间对于 IPS 面板来说也相当快。
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 518 cd/m²
Contrast: 1439:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94, calibrated: 0.75
ΔE Greyscale 3.66 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87.81% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.93% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.22% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 BOE NE160QDM-NZB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Victus 16 (2024) Chi Mei CMN163E, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 Chi Mei CMN161D (160GME), IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1 (BOE0C8E), IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3" | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 BOE NE160QDM-NYC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NE160QDM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -49% | -18% | -14% | -17% | -14% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.22 | 41.3 -58% | 67.5 -32% | 73.2 -26% | 69.3 -30% | 72.4 -27% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.93 | 61.7 -38% | 98.5 -1% | 100 0% | 99.4 -1% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 87.81 | 42.7 -51% | 69.3 -21% | 74.6 -15% | 70.1 -20% | 74.1 -16% |
Response Times | -300% | -36% | -50% | -73% | -78% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 4.8 ? | 28.6 ? -496% | 7.6 ? -58% | 9.6 ? -100% | 11.9 ? -148% | 12.5 ? -160% |
Response Time Black / White * | 9.2 ? | 18.7 ? -103% | 10.4 ? -13% | 9.2 ? -0% | 8.9 ? 3% | 8.7 ? 5% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | -76% | -22% | 3% | 12% | 21% | |
Brightness middle | 518 | 287 -45% | 369 -29% | 635 23% | 384 -26% | 526 2% |
Brightness | 491 | 288 -41% | 344 -30% | 604 23% | 366 -25% | 500 2% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 86 -4% | 89 -1% | 91 1% | 91 1% | 87 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.19 47% | 0.26 28% | 0.64 -78% | 0.35 3% | 0.33 8% |
Contrast | 1439 | 1511 5% | 1419 -1% | 992 -31% | 1097 -24% | 1594 11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.32 | 5.46 -26% | 3.04 30% | 1.89 56% | 0.97 78% | 1.2 72% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.37 | 20.36 -220% | 5.56 13% | 3.14 51% | 3.57 44% | 2.1 67% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.75 | 3.52 -369% | 2.35 -213% | 1.14 -52% | 0.77 -3% | 1 -33% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.66 | 4.8 -31% | 3.38 8% | 2.53 31% | 1.5 59% | 1.3 64% |
Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.108 104% | 2.47 89% | 2.36 93% | 2.24 98% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 6841 95% | 6442 101% | 6040 108% | 6434 101% | 6709 97% | 6391 102% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -142% /
-102% | -25% /
-23% | -20% /
-8% | -26% /
-6% | -24% /
-1% |
* ... smaller is better
sRGB 和 Display P3 几乎完全覆盖,AdobeRGB 的覆盖率接近 88%。
开箱后,屏幕并没有完全校准到最佳状态。我们自己使用 X-Rite i1Pro 色彩测量设备和 Calman 软件进行了校准,将其灰度和色彩 DeltaE 值降至 1 以下。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.6 ms rise | |
↘ 4.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.2 ms rise | |
↘ 2.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17212 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
由于屏幕亮度相当高,接近 500 尼特,而且还采用了磨砂表面,因此可以减少大部分反光,只要直视屏幕并避免阳光直射,就能很好地在户外使用笔记本电脑。
性能 - Pro 5i 出色的 CPU 和游戏性能
与Legion Pro 5i 的高端组件相比 i9 14900HX和 RTX 4070相比,目前的测试设备配备了 i7 14700HX和 RTX 4060.这意味着这款笔记本电脑属于中端游戏玩家。
由于Legion 的显示屏色彩相对准确、明亮,它可能也会受到不少创作者的青睐--尽管它的设计可以做得更精致一些。
测试条件
联想 Vantage 软件是Legion Pro 5i 的控制中心。除了性能配置文件外,还可以在这里找到各种其他设置--从键盘照明和电源到 MUX 开关和系统更新。
有三种预设性能配置文件可供选择(性能、平衡、安静)--在平衡模式下还可以添加人工智能引擎,另外还有一种自定义模式,可以手动设置各种参数。
我们在基准测试中使用了不超频 GPU 的性能模式。安静模式用于电池测试。有时,我们会额外提供其他性能模式的测量值。
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿 i7-14700HX是一款基于全新 Raptor Lake HX Refresh 系列的高端 CPU。该处理器包含 8 个 P 核心和 12 个 E 核心,由于采用了超线程技术,可以同时处理 28 个线程。
在我们的循环测试中,CPU 的性能表现非常稳定,在 30 分钟的时间里性能损失极小。它的性能超过了大多数竞争对手,只有Legion Pro 5i 配备了 i9-14900HX
不过,在所有基准测试中,我们的Legion Pro 5i 处理器都表现出色,令人印象深刻。它比我们数据库中 i7-14700HX 的平均水平高出 9%,仅比 i9-14900HX 低 5%。
断开电源后,在运行 Cinebench R15 Multi 时,CPU 性能下降了约 44%。下表显示了 Cinebench R15 Multi 分数和 TDP(取决于性能配置文件),右侧是相应模式下的 TDP 曲线。
性能模式/测量值 | Cinebench R 15 Multi score | TDP |
---|---|---|
性能 | 4137 | 190 - 130 |
带人工智能的平衡 | 3650 | 125 - 70 |
不带人工智能的平衡型 | 3367 | 125 - 65 |
静音 | 2640 | 70 - 65 |
电池 | 2302 | 56 - 45 |
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX | |
Average of class Gaming | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (22313 - 28122, n=6) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (1702 - 2144, n=6) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=200, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (8361 - 10498, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=200, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (651 - 821, n=6) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 855, n=200, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (3328 - 4137, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=206, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (238 - 304, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=195, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (126 - 184, n=6) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (84799 - 104730, n=6) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (5641 - 7041, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (14807 - 17562, n=6) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=107, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (2378 - 2975, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=107, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (15705 - 19597, n=6) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=201, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (1700 - 2133, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (22 - 27.4, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=199, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (41.9 - 55.3, n=6) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=200, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (0.3821 - 0.4896, n=6) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (16932 - 23676, n=6) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (86338 - 116556, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (4008 - 5567, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (129836 - 152200, n=6) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (11704 - 14434, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (42125 - 58380, n=6) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (82161 - 113157, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (1177 - 1682, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (9029 - 12928, n=6) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (39151 - 49671, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
系统性能
在 PCMark 10 中,我们的Legion Pro 仅在生产效率方面稍逊一筹,但在其他方面,它总是直接落后于配置更好的Legion Pro,位居第二。
在 CrossMark 中,它的成绩也特别好,我们的测试机型甚至击败了 "更好 "的自己。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (7528 - 8278, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (10778 - 11087, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=175, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=175, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9823 - 9910, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (10841 - 14135, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=175, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1923 - 2132, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1782 - 1973, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=160, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2107 - 2399, n=2) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1835 - 1885, n=2) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (276 - 301, n=2) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=164, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (251 - 273, n=2) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=189, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (467 - 542, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 8278 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (66599 - 78742, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (81049 - 86175, n=6) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (64033 - 76689, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=196, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Average Intel Core i7-14700HX (82.7 - 96.4, n=6) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开浏览器时已经出现了第一次较小的延迟。在我们的网站上打开多个标签页时,延迟值又略有增加。不过,我们的 4K/60fps YouTube 视频在播放时没有出现任何问题或掉帧。其内部 GPU 负载非常高,达到 78%。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
联想在我们的机型中安装了三星的快速 PCIe 4 NVMe 固态硬盘,存储容量为 1 TB,更确切地说,是著名的 980 Pro 的 OEM 版本。该机型在我们的 固态硬盘最佳排行榜因此,它是同类产品中速度最快的存储设备之一。
在我们的基准测试中,它取得了不错的整体数值,但就像其他Legion (Pro) 5 机型的固态硬盘一样,它无法在较长时间内保持性能,并且出现了热节流现象。令人遗憾的是,联想没有为这款笔记本配备更好的散热系统,而且整个系列似乎都受到了这个问题的影响。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
我们的配置配备了 Nvidia Geforce RTX 4060功耗为 140 瓦。
在合成 3DMark 测试中,GPU 的表现略高于平均水平,但在不带 Pro 后缀的 3DMark 测试中,同样的 RTX 4060 在 Legion 5 不带 Pro 后缀.Legion Pro 5 配备了 RTX 4070和 i9-14900HX在这些测试中快了约 20%。
在电池模式下,再次运行Fire Strike 时,其 3D 性能降低了 23%。
3DMark 11 Performance | 33600 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 65475 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 25650 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 11605 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
在游戏方面,Legion Pro 5 超越了所有采用 RTX 4060 的竞争对手,尤其是采用相同 CPU 和 GPU 的 Victus,它排在最后一位,得分比对手低 15 分。RTX-4070Legion Pro 仅领先 10 分。
最终,我们测试的所有游戏都可以在全高清模式下以最高细节进行;在 QHD 模式下,运行要求较高的游戏时,帧率有时可能会低于 60 fps,但即便如此,这些游戏仍能流畅运行。
我们在连续测试《赛博朋克 2077》时发现,帧率非常稳定,没有出现任何大幅下降。GPU 的频率始终保持在 2,610 MHz,发热温度为 75 至 79 °C。功耗约为 100 瓦。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=179, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=181, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=193, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 220, n=200, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=133, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (110 - 229, n=36) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=179, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (77 - 159.7, n=42) | |
HP Victus 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 |
Skull & Bones | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (31 - 118, n=12, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (65 - 73, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (37 - 98, n=8, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (51 - 57, n=3) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 |
F1 24 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (54.1 - 127, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (54.1 - 60.9, n=6) |
Cyberpunk 2077 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 187.2 | 185.9 | 185.2 | 124.9 | 87.3 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 531 | 364 | 217 | 112 | 83 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 228 | 203 | 191.7 | 183.8 | 129.4 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 226 | 155.5 | 106.1 | 78.1 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 201 | 172.9 | 135.1 | 124.7 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 192 | 165 | 158 | 148 | 106 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 526 | 295 | 231 | 199.9 | ||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 138.6 | 85.7 | 71.1 | 66.5 | 49.1 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 135.3 | 100.8 | 88.7 | 79.5 | 47.5 | |
Skull & Bones (2024) | 137 | 124 | 98 | 69 | 53 | |
F1 24 (2024) | 286 | 247 | 185.3 | 60.6 |
排放和功率:联想游戏机左侧比右侧更热
噪音排放
在性能模式下,风扇大多处于活动状态,在空闲模式下通常也是如此--它们以 25 至 26 分贝的静音速度旋转。在我们通过 3DMark06 进行的中等负载情况下,它们的噪音已经达到了 45 分贝,但竞争对手的噪音同样很大。
在较高负载情况下,风扇的噪音会有所波动,不会保持恒定。表中的数据显示了其最大值。例如,在玩《赛博朋克》时,风扇噪音在 47.5 分贝和 52.69 分贝之间波动。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 25 dB(A) |
Load |
| 45.18 / 53.13 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP Victus 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -13% | 6% | 4% | -7% | -11% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 25 -9% | 23 -0% | 23 -0% | 23.9 -4% | 24 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 28 -22% | 23 -0% | 23 -0% | 24.3 -6% | 24 -4% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 29 -26% | 23 -0% | 23 -0% | 24.3 -6% | 28.8 -25% |
Idle Maximum * | 25 | 33 -32% | 27.96 -12% | 23 8% | 28.9 -16% | 32 -28% |
Load Average * | 45.18 | 45 -0% | 27.96 38% | 38.92 14% | 45.8 -1% | 45.5 -1% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 52.69 | 52.06 1% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 53.13 | 48 10% | 47.89 10% | 52.09 2% | 56.6 -7% | 55.7 -5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43 | 47.89 | 50.96 | 51 | 53.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Legion 闲置时温度已经相当高,我们在设备底部测得的温度高达 39 °C。一般来说,左侧的 WASD 键(对游戏玩家很重要)似乎比右侧发热更多。
在重负载情况下,我们在底部测得的热点温度为 57 °C。戴尔 G16 和酷睿 15 的发热情况类似,而其他竞争对手的温度往往较低。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.1 °C / -12.8 F).
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 19% | 3% | -2% | 8% | 17% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 50 | 50 -0% | 49 2% | 52 -4% | 43.8 12% | 40.4 19% |
Maximum Bottom * | 57 | 50 12% | 58 -2% | 61 -7% | 55.4 3% | 43.8 23% |
Idle Upper Side * | 36 | 25 31% | 35 3% | 35 3% | 32.8 9% | 30.3 16% |
Idle Bottom * | 39 | 26 33% | 35 10% | 39 -0% | 36 8% | 35.3 9% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
扬声器在同类产品中并不突出:音量适中,几乎没有低音。标准耳机插孔可连接模拟设备。
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.13 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.55 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
要测量Legion Pro 5 的真实闲置功耗并非易事,因为这款笔记本电脑几乎持续不断地从插座中消耗约 50 瓦的功率,即使在闲置状态下也是如此!如果等待很长时间,其闲置功耗最终会降低到相对正常的数值(15 至 20 瓦),但只要用 F 键改变笔记本电脑的亮度,其功耗就会回升到 50 瓦,而且会持续很长时间。因此,表中给出的空闲值相当低。
从我们的消耗曲线图中可以看出,在大负载情况下,其消耗和 GPU 性能波动相当大,尤其是当 CPU 和 GPU 承受同样压力时,比如在我们的压力测试中。
在运行《赛博朋克 2077》时,我们测得的平均耗电量为 229 瓦。在压力测试中,我们的测量设备记录的最大耗电量为 297 瓦,而这只是短期耗电量。
说到电源装置:Legion Pro 5i 所配备的 300 瓦电源要比价格更高的Legion 9i 的 330 瓦电源大得多。
Off / Standby | 0.02 / 0.02 Watt |
Idle | 13.7 / 17.7 / 18.5 Watt |
Load |
124 / 297 Watt |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP Victus 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 11% | 14% | 23% | -22% | -8% | |
Idle 150cd/m2 * | 16.4 | 15.4 6% | 14 15% | 11.8 28% | 21 -28% | 17.6 -7% |
3DMark06 Return To Proxycon * | 124 | 104 16% | 77.5 37% | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd * | 229 | |||||
1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25 * | 211 | 176.9 16% | 190 10% | 200.6 5% | 245 -16% | 227 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
联想为这款笔记本电脑配备了 80 瓦时的电池;除了酷睿 15 配备了更大的电池外,其他竞争机型的电池容量都差不多。
我们的测试设备在Wi-Fi和视频测试中持续了5个多小时,亮度降低到150尼特--这是一个平均值或略低于平均值的值,而竞争对手往往超过这个值。
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | HP Victus 16 (2024) i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Dell G16, i7-13650HX, RTX 4060 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 66% | 6% | 109% | -22% | 24% | 12% | |
H.264 | 312 | 381 22% | 608 95% | 576 85% | 413 ? 32% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 308 | 511 66% | 378 23% | 889 189% | 290 -6% | 444 44% | 375 ? 22% |
Load | 105 | 76 -28% | 151 44% | 65 -38% | 46 -56% | 85.5 ? -19% | |
Reader / Idle | 403 | 562 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论--全面关注性能
Legion Pro 5 只注重性能。其已经非常强大的 i7-14700HX 和 RTX 4060 的运行速度超过了平均水平,单纯就性能而言,它们甚至接近 i9-14900HX 和 RTX 4070 的配置。得益于笔记本电脑潜在的极高色彩精确度显示屏,Legion Pro 对内容创作者来说也很有吸引力。
不过,令人遗憾的是,开箱后屏幕的校准精度并不高。考虑到它的重点是游戏性能,制造商应该注意到散热系统在右侧比在 WASD 侧的效果更好一些,这对游戏玩家来说很重要。其他不足之处还包括固态硬盘的热节流以及设备的部分高空闲性能,需要相当长的时间才能恢复平静。尽管如此,总的来说还是利大于弊。
如果你正在寻找一款性能超强的游戏笔记本电脑,那么联想Legion Pro 5i 绝对是你的不二之选。内容创作者可能也会感到满意,不过,一些较小的细节还有更多潜在的优化空间。
价格和供应情况
您可以直接从制造商处订购联想Legion Pro 5i。我们测试设备的 MRSP 为 1,395 美元。
请注意:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
-
07/03/2024 v8
Christian Hintze
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.