Notebookcheck Logo
Vivo X200 Pro Mini smartphone review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

最适合摄影的紧凑型智能手机 - vivo X200 Pro Mini 评测

这个小家伙亮得破了纪录。

2025 年在全球推出迷你旗舰手机可能会成为Galaxy S25 的难题。vivo 的紧凑型高端手机展示了什么是可能的--尤其是在摄影领域。超薄边框、大尺寸索尼传感器、XXL 电池和快速充电只是其中的一些亮点。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

对 vivo X200 Pro Mini 的评价

如果你喜欢小巧的智能手机,那么 X200 Pro Mini 比大多数其他厂商的产品更有旗舰感觉。在性能和电池续航时间方面,这款小巧的 vivo 手机无需做出任何妥协。在实际的 APL18 测试中,即使是真正的旗舰产品 X200 Pro 也没有达到超过 4500 cd/m² 的数值。

即使是 X200 Pro Mini 的照相系统也没有任何真正值得批评的地方,尽管由于手机的超薄和紧凑设计,其潜望镜效果比其大哥大要弱一些。不过,在日常使用中,这款 vivo 手机仍然拥有出色的照片质量--尤其是其配备大尺寸索尼传感器的主摄像头,与目前任何高端智能手机相比都毫不逊色。

遗憾的是,X200 Pro Mini 也不是一款完美的紧凑型旗舰智能手机,因为这款 vivo 手机被剥夺了太多的高端功能(USB 3.2、超声波传感器......),而且其 SoC 也没有达到最佳状态。在日常使用中,这些不足究竟有多严重,还需要单独权衡。尽管如此,中国版本所面临的限制(没有 Band 20,......)在全球上市后应该不再是问题。

Pros

+ 明亮的 LTPO 面板
+ 高性能
+ 高质量、小巧的外壳
+ 功能强大的主摄像头
+ 运行时间长

Cons

- 不支持 eSIM
- 仅支持 USB 2.0
- 只能作为进口设备使用
- SoC 高节流
- 无更新保证

价格和供应情况

在中国,配备 12GB 内存和 256GB 闪存的 vivo X200 Pro Mini 售价 4699 元(约合 650 美元)。通过我们的贷方深圳贸易公司,您可以 730.04 美元的价格进口这款手机。由于 vivo 尚未宣布全球上市,我们无法为您提供有关该设备定价的更多信息。

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
87.2%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $4.43
AKABEILA [2 Pack Privacy Scr...
2. $11.99
TNKISRY Tempered Glass for V...
3. $4.33
AKABEILA Compatible with viv...
List Price: 700€
187 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.31"
2640x1216
461 PPI
AMOLED
2.
90% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon: $766.75
List Price: 899€
167 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.20"
2340x1080
416 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
3.
85.7%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. $999.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro - Unlocke...
2. $1,779.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Un...
3. $799.00
Google Pixel 9 - Unlocked An...
199 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"
2856x1280
495 PPI
OLED
4.
88.4%
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $19.98
For Xiaomi Charger 67W Mi Tu...
2. $20.98
for Xiaomi Charger 120W Hype...
3. $9.98
120W for Xiaomi Charger Cabl...
List Price: 760€
191 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.36"
2670x1200
460 PPI
OLED
5.
89% v7 (old)
Sony Xperia 5 V
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon: $857.22
List Price: 999€
182 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"
2520x1080
449 PPI
OLED

X100 系列,vivo 将推出其当前旗舰手机的紧凑型版本,即 X200 Pro今年,vivo 将推出其目前的旗舰手机 X200 Pro 的紧凑型版本。这款小巧的迷你版手机采用了蔡司三摄像头等旗舰级硬件,因此小尺寸智能手机的粉丝们几乎不必做出任何妥协。

如果你想拥有 X200 Pro Mini,那么目前只能从 vivo 进口这款小旗舰。不过,目前有迹象表明 X200 Pro Mini 将在全球发布,但具体日期还未确定。

vivo X200 Pro mini 的规格

Vivo X200 Pro Mini (X200 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 8 x - 3.6 GHz, Cortex-X925, X4, A720
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
Display
6.31 inch 19.5:9, 2640 x 1216 pixel 461 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 457 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, IR Blaster, OTG, Miracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G GSM: 850/900/1800/1900MHz; 3G WCDMA: B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19; 4G TD-LTE: B34/B38/B39/B40/B41; 4G FDD-LTE: B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28A/B66; 5G: n1/n3/n5/n8/n28A/n38/n40/n41/n77/n78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 150.8 x 71.8
Battery
5700 mAh Silicon-Carbon
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.6, 23 mmm, OIS) + 50 MPix (3x optical zoom, f/2.6, 70 mm, OIS) + 50 MPix (f/2.0, 15 mm)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0, 20 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, charger, USB cable, case, ColorOS, 12 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1, HDR: Dolby Vision, HLG, HDR10, HDR10+; Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LC3, Opus; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS, fanless, waterproof
Weight
187 g, Power Supply: 115 g
Price
700 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

对这款小巧的旗舰手机感兴趣的用户可以选择四种颜色,它们都采用磨砂玻璃后壳。这意味着在日常使用中,手指残留的油脂不会成为问题。制造商尚未透露正面和背面使用的是哪种保护玻璃。

6.31 英寸 AMOLED 面板周围的边框保持得非常纤薄,这使得这款迷你机型的屏占比超过 91%,非常高效。它的制造质量也是一流的,内置按键牢牢地固定在金属框架上。

vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测(图片来源:Marcus Herbrich)
vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测(图片来源:Marcus Herbrich)
vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测(图片来源:Marcus Herbrich)
vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测(图片来源:Marcus Herbrich)
vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测(图片来源:Marcus Herbrich)
vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测(图片来源:Marcus Herbrich)

尺寸比较

154 mm 68 mm 8.6 mm 182 g152.8 mm 72 mm 8.5 mm 199 g152.3 mm 71.2 mm 8.08 mm 191 g150.8 mm 71.8 mm 8.2 mm 187 g147 mm 70.6 mm 7.6 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 这款小巧的手机只有 USB 2.0 接口

X200 Pro Mini 是中国制造商推出的一款小型旗舰产品,整体连接性非常出色,包括蓝牙 5.4、红外爆破器、Miracast 和 NFC,但它并没有发挥出应有的全部功能--它不支持 eSIM 或存储扩展,没有超宽带芯片,甚至没有快速 USB 3.2 端口。 大哥大端口。从我们的角度来看,后者的限制尤其难以理解。这就意味着,迷你机型没有有线图像输出,只能靠缓慢的数据传输。

箱体左侧
箱体左侧
机箱右侧(按钮)
机箱右侧(按钮)
机身底部侧面(扬声器、麦克风、USB 端口、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽)
机身底部侧面(扬声器、麦克风、USB 端口、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽)
顶部箱体侧面
顶部箱体侧面

软件 - 配备Android 15 的 vivo X200 Pro Mini

迄今为止,X200 Pro Mini 只在中国推出,它使用的是该公司自己的 OriginOS 第 5 版,该版本基于Android 15,支持多种语言。vivo 打算在多长时间内为其小型旗舰手机提供更新支持,但迄今为止尚未公布。过去,vivo 的软件供应仅限于三个主要的Android 版本和三年的安全补丁,这与 像素 9 ProGalaxy S24.在我们测试时,最新补丁的日期是 2024 年 12 月。

vivo 的 "原子岛 "灵感来自Apple 的 "动感岛",以及手机的众多 AI 功能。它在打孔周围的屏幕区域显示音乐播放或来电等实时信息。开箱后没有直接安装谷歌 Play 商店,但可以通过内部的 V-Appstore 获取谷歌应用程序,安装后可以顺利使用 Play 商店。

随着全球版本在欧洲的发布,迷你机型将采用 Funtouch 操作系统,就像 X200 Pro.后者看起来没有那么现代,但与中国版不同的是,它没有预装中国服务,谷歌应用可以正常使用。

vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测
vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测
vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测
vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测

可持续性

X200 Pro Mini- 没有提供可持续发展方面的信息,看来 vivo 在这方面还有待改进。所使用的材料及其可回收成分完全没有透明地公布。此外,也几乎无法确认用户是否可以自行维修该设备。

手机的包装很可能不含塑料,而且是用大豆油油墨印刷的。然而,vivo 智能手机本身在运输过程中使用了塑料材料(铝箔、外壳)。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 7 的小型Android 手机

在家庭 Wi-Fi 网络中,X200 Pro Mini 采用了当前 WiFi 7 的最佳标准,但这款顶级手机无法使用 6 GHz 频道。这意味着在我们使用参考路由器进行的测试中,只能使用 2.4 和 5 GHz 范围建立连接。不过,全球版本的设备并不一定是这种情况。在使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT AXE11000 时,X200 Pro Mini 仍然显示出较高且相对稳定的传输速率--在峰值数据接收时超过 1,800 MBit/s。

除了快速的 Wi-Fi 外,vivo 手机还采用了 5G 标准,但只支持 17 个 LTE 频段。由于中国版本的频率覆盖范围普遍较小,这一缺陷在全球版本的手机中将不会出现。我们的 CN 版本也不支持接入 4G 网络中的 20 频段。带卫星通信功能的版本可能也只面向中国市场。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (556 - 1806, n=56)
1021 MBit/s +36%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Wi-Fi 6E
958 (934min - 976max) MBit/s +28%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
955 (858min - 990max) MBit/s +28%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Wi-Fi 6E
913 (688min - 994max) MBit/s +22%
Xiaomi 15
Wi-Fi 7
876 (445min - 968max) MBit/s +17%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Wi-Fi 7
748 (603min, 622.14P1 - 825max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (49.8 - 1806, n=185, last 2 years)
719 MBit/s -4%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Wi-Fi 7
1698 (1563min, 1566.48P1 - 1809max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (565 - 1875, n=56)
1005 MBit/s -41%
Xiaomi 15
Wi-Fi 7
871 (785min - 951max) MBit/s -49%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Wi-Fi 6E
838 (818min - 850max) MBit/s -51%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
795 (680min - 916max) MBit/s -53%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Wi-Fi 6E
774 (699min - 820max) MBit/s -54%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52 - 1857, n=183, last 2 years)
701 MBit/s -59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
1830 (1666min - 1889max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (563 - 1945, n=42)
1537 MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (521 - 1945, n=78, last 2 years)
1431 MBit/s
Xiaomi 15
Wi-Fi 7
1386 (628min - 1900max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi 15
Wi-Fi 7
1793 (1671min - 1841max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
1602 (1387min - 1829max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (451 - 1864, n=42)
1516 MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (451 - 1864, n=78, last 2 years)
1362 MBit/s
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Vivo X200 Pro Mini Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø748 (603-825)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø913 (688-994)
Vivo X200 Pro Mini Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1698 (1563-1809)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø772 (699-820)
户外定位服务
户外定位服务
室内定位服务
室内定位服务

我们带着 X200 Pro Mini 和 Garmin Venu 2 一起骑车,仔细观察了它们的定位服务。Vivo 手机使用双频 GNSS 确定位置,精确度约为 1 到 2 米。

我们在 vivo 智能手机上确定的总距离与 Garmin 智能手表非常相似,在详细路线上只能看到微小的误差。总的来说,X200 Pro 非常准确,非常适合日常导航任务。

Garmin Venu 2
Garmin Venu 2
vivo X200 Pro Mini
vivo X200 Pro Mini

电话功能和通话质量 - 支持双 SIM 卡的 vivo X200 Pro Mini

手机上安装的两个麦克风可提供愉悦的通话体验。通过耳机播放的语音非常清晰,音量也足够大。与三星类似,AI 助手可根据要求用于对话,例如翻译或摘要。

这款小巧的旗舰手机拥有两个 nano-SIM 卡插槽,支持全面的双 SIM 卡和 5G 网络。我们无法在设备的系统设置中找到将 eSIM 集成到系统中的选项。

照相机 - 小巧的智能手机,大照片品质

vivo X200 Pro Mini 上的自拍照
vivo X200 Pro Mini 上的自拍照

X200 Pro Mini 的前置镜头为 3200 万像素,照片质量不错,但 vivo 没有进行像素分选和自动对焦。不过,自拍照看起来细节丰富,曝光度也不错,甚至还可以拍摄每秒 60 帧的超高清视频。

不过,这款紧凑型旗舰手机的真正亮点还是其背面的相机系统,特别是使用索尼 LYT-818 的主摄像头。它不仅配备了速度极快的 f/1.57 镜头,而且还配备了 1/1.28 英寸的超大传感器。相比之下 Galaxy S24使用的是尺寸小得多的 1/1.56 英寸传感器。

标准模式(右)与蔡司模式(左)对比

手机的 5000 万像素镜头具有 OIS 和蔡司 T* 涂层。T* 是 "Transmission Layer"(透射层)的缩写,旨在增加可见光的透射率。这不仅提高了色彩质量,还降低了反光率。在日常使用中,X200 Pro Mini 拥有非常出色的 HDR 计算能力,这意味着它的动态范围和曝光通常都非常出色。不过,如果您不喜欢过于饱和的色彩,那么您应该将标准模式改为更加中性的蔡司模式。在弱光环境下的照片质量在同类产品中也令人印象深刻。

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
3x
3x
5x
5x
10x
10x
100倍(最大值)
100倍(最大值)

不过,与 X200 Pro 相比,迷你机型在主摄像头方面不得不做出一些小小的妥协。它的潜望式长焦镜头(包括 OIS)分辨率没有达到 200 万像素,只有 50 万像素,而且只能实现三倍无损变焦。不过,这款小巧的智能手机在日常生活中主要使用的 2 倍至 10 倍范围内都能提供非常出色的画质。即使是 100 倍的数码变焦,其细节也几乎令人惊叹。

根据数据表,这款手机的超广角镜头应该与其大哥大的镜头相同。在我们的测试照片中,50MPix 镜头显示出大量细节和良好的清晰度,是同类产品中最好的镜头之一。

X200 Pro Mini 在录制视频时也大有可为。移动图像支持 4K60 HDR、LOG,并能以高达 120fps 的 UHD 画质进行录制。此外,还配备了专业视频模式。在拍摄 4K30 时,可以在录制过程中更换镜头,而且色温调节得非常好。

vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测
vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测
vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测
vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测
vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测
vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测
vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow lightUltra-wide angle

我们分析了主摄像头的色彩描绘与受控照明条件下的实际参考色彩的对比。在描绘 ColorChecker Passport 时,50MP 镜头显示出一些增亮和过饱和现象,尤其是绿色和棕色色调。不过值得庆幸的是,X200 Pro Mini 在色彩保真度方面只出现了几个异常值(>10)。

ColorChecker
10 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
11 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X200 Pro Mini: 9.34 ∆E min: 2.46 - max: 16.09 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
54.9 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
53.9 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
41.7 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
62.2 ∆E
65.4 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.9 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
88.8 ∆E
70.3 ∆E
52 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X200 Pro Mini: 45.87 ∆E min: 12.81 - max: 88.82 ∆E

附件和保修 -Galaxy S25 竞争对手配有电源装置

手机的供货范围包括一个模块化 90 瓦快速充电电源、一个保护盖、一条数据/充电线(USB-A 转 USB-C)、一个 SIM 卡针和一份快速入门指南。屏幕上还安装了屏幕保护膜,vivo 称该屏幕已针对指纹识别进行了专门优化。我们在深圳贸易公司的借货人在中国版的交货范围内增加了一个欧盟充电器适配器和一个 USB OTG 适配器。

我们的进口设备提供 12 个月保修。如果需要保修,Trading Shenzhen 可以选择将智能手机寄往德国的送货地址。

输入设备和操作 - 配备面部解锁功能的 vivo X200 Pro Mini

得益于手机的紧凑设计,按键的位置非常符合人体工程学,而且按键的受力点很好,可以实现精确操作。6.31 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏的输入也非常精确。得益于高达 120 Hz 的高刷新率,这款迷你旗舰手机在日常使用中运行流畅,动画效果也很流畅。振动电机提供的触觉反馈对于日常使用同样重要。就 X200 Pro Mini 而言,它能精确地传递高品质的感觉。

遗憾的是,这款小型旗舰机没有使用全新的 3D 超声波指纹传感器,而 X200 Pro Mini 则使用了全新的 3D 超声波指纹传感器。 X200 Pro的新型 3D 超声波指纹传感器,而只能使用光学指纹传感器进行生物解锁。不过,在我们的测试中,vivo 手机还是可靠地解锁了显示屏。您还可以使用安全性较低的 2D 面部识别功能,该功能基于使用前置摄像头的 FaceUnlock 功能。

vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测
vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测
vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测

显示屏 - 配备 OLED 的紧凑型智能手机

OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,每个子像素由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。
OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,每个子像素由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。

X200 Pro Mini 采用 6.31 英寸 OLED 面板,基于 LTPO 技术,可将帧频从 1 Hz 动态调节到 120 Hz。得益于其 461 PPI 的 1,216p 高分辨率,该面板看起来既漂亮又清晰,并两次获得德国莱茵 TÜV 认证(无闪烁、低蓝光含量)。

虽然我们在白色背景下测量的峰值亮度 "仅 "为 1,863 cd/m²,但在显示更适合日常使用的 APL18 图案时,我们获得了令人难以置信的 4,526 cd/m²。这与手机宣传的峰值亮度 4,500 尼特相当。因此,通过 HDR10+ 认证的 AMOLED 显示屏保证了一流的 HDR 效果。

1862
cd/m²
1843
cd/m²
1818
cd/m²
1794
cd/m²
1764
cd/m²
1802
cd/m²
1822
cd/m²
1864
cd/m²
1785
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1864 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1817.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.86 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1764 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.239
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
AMOLED, 2640x1216, 6.3"
Samsung Galaxy S24
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.2"
Google Pixel 9 Pro
OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"
Xiaomi 15
OLED, 2670x1200, 6.4"
Sony Xperia 5 V
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1"
Screen
-111%
2%
-52%
-57%
Brightness middle
1764
1349
-24%
2083
18%
1021
-42%
889
-50%
Brightness
1817
1369
-25%
2016
11%
1018
-44%
898
-51%
Brightness Distribution
95
97
2%
84
-12%
98
3%
97
2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.84
3.3
-293%
0.7
17%
1.3
-55%
1.4
-67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.53
5
-227%
2
-31%
2.9
-90%
4.5
-194%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.2
2.4
-100%
1.1
8%
2.2
-83%
1
17%
Gamma
2.239 98%
1.97 112%
2.22 99%
2.25 98%
2.23 99%
CCT
6646 98%
6635 98%
6560 99%
6658 98%
6456 101%

* ... smaller is better

与 OLED 的典型做法一样,PWM 调制用于控制屏幕的亮度,这表现为闪烁显示。根据 vivo 的说法,X200 Pro Mini 采用了 2160 Hz 的高 PWM 调光频率,以达到保护眼睛的目的。我们对显示屏的测量结果约为 490 赫兹。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 361 Hz
Amplitude: 19 %

The display backlight flickers at 361 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 361 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8600 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

ColorOS 的色彩显示设置非常丰富。有三种色彩配置文件可供选择,还可以设置色温。

我们使用 Calman 分析软件来检查其色彩校准的偏差。我们测量到的单色和灰度的 DeltaE 值都非常低。

色彩准确度(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩准确度(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:Adobe RGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:Adobe RGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:P3)
色彩空间(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:P3)
色彩空间(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7 ms rise
↘ 0.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8 ms rise
↘ 0.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms).

在户外,X200 Pro Mini 给人留下了深刻的印象。得益于其出色的亮度,无论在夏天还是在冬天,显示屏的内容在阳光直射下都能清晰可见。在视角稳定性方面,我们也没有什么可批评的。即使倾斜,OLED 面板的色彩也能保持稳定。

性能 - 配备高端芯片的小型Android 手机

如果您想在智能手机中使用目前最好的 SoC,那么小巧的 Vivo 手机将是您的最佳选择。峰值主频速度为 3.65 GHz 的 Dimensity 9400的 Geekbench 数值无法与 骁龙 8 精英版小米 15的 Geekbench 数值,但 vivo 手机仍然拥有充足的动力。在人工智能基准测试中,联发科芯片组的表现尤为突出,将竞争对手甩在了后面。

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3001 Points +16%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (2589 - 2748, n=3)
2647 Points +2%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2589 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
2045 Points -21%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
2006 Points -23%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1971 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=187, last 2 years)
1499 Points -42%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9202 Points +14%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
8078 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (7480 - 8574, n=3)
8044 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
6456 Points -20%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
5198 Points -36%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4820 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=187, last 2 years)
4240 Points -48%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2173 Points +4%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2084 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (1838 - 2084, n=3)
1973 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1553 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1497 Points -28%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1372 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (139 - 2437, n=169, last 2 years)
1063 Points -49%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
7733 Points +5%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
7398 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (5870 - 8126, n=3)
7131 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
5561 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
4998 Points -32%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
3787 Points -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 8816, n=169, last 2 years)
3567 Points -52%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2677100 Points +10%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (2374537 - 2705165, n=3)
2503068 Points +3%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2429503 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1616403 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=123, last 2 years)
1302998 Points -46%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1139380 Points -53%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
19192 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
17763 Points +10%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
16216 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
15925 Points -2%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (12314 - 16216, n=3)
14793 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=193, last 2 years)
13526 Points -17%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
11823 Points -27%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1718 Points +7%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1599 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (1145 - 1663, n=3)
1469 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1256 Points -21%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1170 Points -27%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1021 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=165, last 2 years)
946 Points -41%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (10697 - 12594, n=3)
11413 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11031 Points +1%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
10948 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
9287 Points -15%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
8863 Points -19%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
7716 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 13729, n=159, last 2 years)
6566 Points -40%
System
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
16439 Points +15%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
14618 Points +2%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (12891 - 16162, n=3)
14452 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
14406 Points +1%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
14303 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 19891, n=159, last 2 years)
10376 Points -27%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
8029 Points -44%
Memory
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
16961 Points +79%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (9432 - 13673, n=3)
10856 Points +15%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
10197 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
10193 Points +8%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
9463 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
9266 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=159, last 2 years)
7164 Points -24%
Graphics
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (51898 - 56004, n=3)
53547 Points +2%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
52738 Points
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
44189 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
26783 Points -49%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
26141 Points -50%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
23041 Points -56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=159, last 2 years)
18524 Points -65%
Web
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (1923 - 2183, n=3)
2038 Points +1%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2009 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1908 Points -5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1879 Points -6%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1743 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=159, last 2 years)
1587 Points -21%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1202 Points -40%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
78695 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (75143 - 81594, n=3)
78477 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
36578 Points -54%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
18154 Points -77%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
18038 Points -77%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
16413 Points -79%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
11574 Points -85%
AImark - Score v3.x
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
52274 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (51509 - 52884, n=3)
52222 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=141, last 2 years)
27381 Points -48%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1790 Points -97%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1160 Points -98%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1146 Points -98%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1134 Points -98%
Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (12898 - 13084, n=2)
12991 Points +1%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12898 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=27, last 2 years)
2026 Points -84%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1096 Points -92%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1080 Points -92%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (9184 - 9453, n=2)
9319 Points +1%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
9184 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=27, last 2 years)
1273 Points -86%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
491 Points -95%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
324 Points -96%
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (1433 - 1501, n=2)
1467 Points +2%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1433 Points
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
500 Points -65%
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 1501, n=27, last 2 years)
440 Points -69%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
283 Points -80%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3219, n=34, last 2 years)
974 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
182 Points
Score V6
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
10783 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
  (9873 - 10783, n=2)
10328 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 10957, n=31, last 2 years)
3744 Points -65%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1112 Points -90%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
991 Points -91%

安装在GPU 单元安装在 Dimensity 9400X200 Pro Mini 内有 12 个内核。与 小米 15Adreno 830相比,vivo 手机在 GFXBench 和 3DMark 测试中的得分略低。不过,前者表明,即使是要求非常高的游戏,在 4K 分辨率下,vivo 手机也能以接近 50fps 的速度运行--至少在某些时候是这样。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6076 Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5845 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3933 Points -35%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3627 Points -40%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2605 Points -57%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5995 Points +1%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5923 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3902 Points -34%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3667 Points -38%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2547 Points -57%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24960 Points +12%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22342 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13993 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12652 Points -43%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9476 Points -58%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10764 Points +5%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10278 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6649 Points -35%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11649 Points +12%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10432 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6673 Points -36%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2298 Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2258 Points -2%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1026 Points -55%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2365 Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2362 Points 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1001 Points -58%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
718 fps +14%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
628 fps
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
476 fps -24%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
415 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
403 fps -36%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
423 fps -6%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
289 fps -36%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
245 fps -46%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps -13%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
308 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
307 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps -30%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
205 fps -33%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
165 fps -46%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps -12%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -16%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -55%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
192 fps +22%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
157 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps -17%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps -25%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +6%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps -4%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps -20%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps -12%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -36%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps -2%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps -36%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
274 fps +6%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
258 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps -41%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
140 fps -46%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -54%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47 fps +2%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps -30%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -35%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -57%

X200 Pro Mini 的浏览器速度表现良好,基准测试结果也不错。在日常使用中,网站加载速度很快,滚动浏览也很流畅。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (167.1 - 234, n=3)
206 Points +23%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
191.986 Points +15%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
179.212 Points +7%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133)
167.122 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
128.638 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (111.1 - 387, n=170, last 2 years)
128.4 Points -23%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
108.429 Points -35%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
23.5 runs/min +57%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (15 - 17.7, n=3)
16.3 runs/min +9%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
15.8 runs/min +5%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133)
15 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=83, last 2 years)
12.2 runs/min -19%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (147 - 225, n=3)
182.7 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
176 Points 0%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133)
176 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
171 Points -3%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
168 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
121.6 Points -31%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
106 Points -40%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
78653 Points +38%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (56843 - 86943, n=3)
68258 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
63748 Points +12%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
61881 Points +9%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
60566 Points +7%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133)
56843 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=207, last 2 years)
40359 Points -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1478 ms * -124%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
705.9 ms * -7%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
699 ms * -6%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
662.3 ms * -0%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133)
660.34 ms *
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (432 - 660, n=3)
572 ms * +13%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
454.4 ms * +31%

* ... smaller is better

在存储速度方面,该手机的 UFS 4.0 存储系统表现出色。其 AndroBench 数值非常出色,尤其是在写入和读取小数据块时。

Vivo X200 Pro MiniSamsung Galaxy S24Google Pixel 9 ProXiaomi 15Sony Xperia 5 VAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-26%
-57%
-4%
-26%
0%
-37%
Sequential Read 256KB
3804.53
3701.23
-3%
1717.9
-55%
3934.92
3%
1812.23
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB
3384.34
1435.39
-58%
253.53
-93%
3889.06
15%
1331.81
-61%
3062 ?(1524 - 4030, n=42)
-10%
Random Read 4KB
302.11
373.12
24%
218.41
-28%
296.95
-2%
359.71
19%
Random Write 4KB
532.65
175.98
-67%
261.55
-51%
360.36
-32%
473.91
-11%

游戏 - vivo 手机可实现 120fps 的速度

由于散热效果不理想(参见 "排放 "部分),X200 Pro Mini 绝不是一款适合游戏玩家的完美手机,但你仍然可以使用其原生 120 Hz 刷新率以较低的细节运行当前的游戏。

在测试过程中,我们使用GameBench 以较低的图形设置玩射击游戏《PUBG Mobile》时,达到了上述每秒 120 帧的速度。.帧数没有明显下降。要求苛刻的《Genshin Impact 》在最佳图形设置下也能以 60 帧/秒的速度运行,这也是目前Android 上的最好成绩。

Geshin Impact
Geshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Vivo X200 Pro Mini; Genshin Impact: Ø60.3 (55-61)
Vivo X200 Pro Mini; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø119.1 (116-121)
Vivo X200 Pro Mini; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (52-61)
Vivo X200 Pro Mini; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.8 (38-41)

排放 - vivo X200 Pro Mini 的强劲音效

温度

温度明显升高 Dimensity 9400在 3DMark 的 Wild Life 压力测试中,X200 Pro Mini 导致系统明显减速。我们测得的降幅约为 40%-50%。这意味着这款小巧的旗舰产品比它的 大哥但比 小米 15.在一个小时的 "Burnout "基准测试负载阶段,我们注意到相机区域的温度峰值接近 46 °C。

Max. Load
 44.7 °C45 °C40.6 °C 
 45.6 °C44.4 °C41.2 °C 
 45.9 °C44.1 °C41 °C 
Maximum: 45.9 °C
Average: 43.6 °C
39.7 °C41.6 °C37.7 °C
39.2 °C42.8 °C40 °C
40.4 °C43.6 °C40 °C
Maximum: 43.6 °C
Average: 40.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.5 % +68%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.6 % +50%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.3 % +47%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 % +16%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
45 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.3 % +43%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.7 % +42%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57 % +18%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.3 % +6%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48.4 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.9 % +10%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60.7 %
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.9 % -5%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77.3 % +26%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69.5 % +14%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61.2 %
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Vivo X200 Pro Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.2 (16.7-34.4)
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø29 (26.2-38.2)
Vivo X200 Pro Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø62.4 (47.5-105.6)
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø101.2 (87.7-132.2)
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø117.4 (98.5-139.4)
Vivo X200 Pro Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø25 (21.3-35)
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø27.8 (24.8-37.1)
Vivo X200 Pro Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.1 (10.8-17.6)
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.8 (12.2-17.6)

发言人

X200 Pro Mini 的立体声扬声器声音悦耳,低音轻盈。不过,在粉红噪声测试中,它的中高音起伏表现不够理想。不过,作为一款小巧的智能手机,vivo 手机的音效还是很有深度的。

如果需要外接声音输出,可以使用有线 USB 端口或无线蓝牙 5.4。后者支持相当数量的编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.542.42539.436.23136.329.94033.532.45037.736.8632729.78023.429.310022.736.212519.243.616020.953.120019.658.625017.259.231516.860.640015.258.750016.163.363020.867.780020.668.9100018.570.7125016.773.5160018.275.3200015.977.225001577.8315017.972.1400020.864.6500021.268.5630019.372.7800020.475.11000018.577.31250016.272.51600016.261.5SPL30.985.7N1.463.4median 18.5median 68.5Delta1.96.8334230.933.519.43327.335.4374026.937.31938.418.439.11542.116.152.715.953.114.258.912.163.11463.714.773.11577.513.781.714.18113.676.513.174.912.876.113.378.713.477.813.879.81478.314.178.113.575.813.774.513.670.713.165.92689.90.785.5median 13.8median 75.80.77.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVivo X200 Pro MiniSony Xperia 5 V
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Vivo X200 Pro Mini audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Sony Xperia 5 V audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 小手机大电池

Galaxy S24(5,700 mAh) 相比,X200 Pro Mini 的电池容量更大,达到 5,700 mAh,可通过 USB-C 接口以最高 90 瓦的功率充电。该储能设备(21.78 Wh,3.82 V)还可以无线充电,最大功率为 30 瓦。在测试过程中,我们注意到充电时间约为 40 分钟。

X200 Pro Mini 在闲置模式下的功耗为 1.6 瓦,效率不高。虽然必须考虑到 vivo 手机明亮的显示屏,但这里肯定还有优化的空间。

耗电量

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.6 / 1.6 / 2.5 Watt
Load midlight 8.9 / 11.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
5700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro
4700 mAh
Xiaomi 15
5400 mAh
Sony Xperia 5 V
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
2%
5%
24%
18%
11%
6%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
0.42
30%
0.59
2%
0.5
17%
0.79
-32%
0.543 ?(0.43 - 0.6, n=3)
9%
Idle Average *
1.6
0.93
42%
1.1
31%
1.11
31%
1.08
32%
1.387 ?(0.8 - 1.76, n=3)
13%
Idle Maximum *
2.5
1.07
57%
1.2
52%
1.13
55%
1.12
55%
1.743 ?(0.9 - 2.5, n=3)
30%
Load Average *
8.9
15.43
-73%
7.15
20%
8.91
-0%
7.93
11%
Load Maximum *
11.2
16.51
-47%
20.37
-82%
9.3
17%
8.78
22%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Vivo X200 Pro Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.81 (0.633-11.3)
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5 (0.695-9.3)
Vivo X200 Pro Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.251 (0.533-3.22)
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.681 (0.615-1.184)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Vivo X200 Pro Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.3 (11.2-11.3)
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.27 (9.11-9.3)
Vivo X200 Pro Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.251 (0.533-3.22)
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.681 (0.615-1.184)

运行时间

大容量电池帮助 vivo 手机实现了非常出色的运行时间。我们在调整显示亮度(150 cd/m²)后得出的数值具有最佳可比性,因为所有测试设备的数值都相同。在这里,X200 Pro Mini 在使用 Wi-Fi 上网超过 19 小时后才停止工作,而在不使用 Wi-Fi 的情况下,其无休止视频播放的续航时间同样长达 35 小时。值得一提的是,当电池电量较低时(2%),所有应用程序都会自动关闭,X200 Pro Mini 进入待机模式。总的来说,WLAN 调制解调器的耗电量似乎相当大。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 133)
19h 13min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
34h 58min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 47min
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
5700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro
4700 mAh
Xiaomi 15
5400 mAh
Sony Xperia 5 V
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-32%
-12%
16%
6%
H.264
2098
1227
-42%
1784
-15%
1493
-29%
WiFi v1.3
1153
880
-24%
1017
-12%
1367
19%
952
-17%
Load
227
159
-30%
326
44%
371
63%
Reader / Idle
2398
3759
2788

Notebookcheck 总评分

vivo 的 X200 Pro 在小巧的智能手机中营造出了真正的旗舰感觉。与许多其他制造商相比,这款迷你机型更接近 "原版",尤其是在摄像头方面。

Vivo X200 Pro Mini - 02/19/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
66 / 69 → 95%
Weight
90%
Battery
92%
Display
93%
Games Performance
34 / 55 → 62%
Application Performance
74 / 85 → 87%
AI Performance
79%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 87%
Camera
85%
Average
69%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
95.7%
Repairability
35%
Software Updates
50%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 46.8%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 最适合摄影的紧凑型智能手机 - vivo X200 Pro Mini 评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-02-25 (Update: 2025-02-25)