Notebookcheck Logo
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Plus Notebookckeck review

人工智能平板电脑的显示屏有问题--三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 评测

这个 SoC 有意义吗？

据三星称，Galaxy Tab S10+ 是一款专为人工智能功能开发的平板电脑。然而，这家制造商在处理器的选择上有了新的突破。在我们的 Tab S10 Plus 评测中，我们将仔细研究Galaxy Tab 是否真的使用了这款芯片组。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Tablet Galaxy Tab

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 评价

Galaxy Tab S 系列是Android 领域高端平板电脑的代名词。然而，在 Tab S10 系列中，三星在许多方面都打破了传统。与上一代的高通芯片组相比，内置联发科 Dimensity 9300+ 的 NPU 性能更高，这对于 OneUI 的众多人工智能功能来说无疑是一个优势。尽管如此，在当前一代处理器发布前不久将搭载 2023 SoC 的 Tab S10+ 推向市场还是一个令人遗憾的选择。虽然三星过去也做过类似的事情，但考虑到我们在 Dimensity 9400 或 Snapdragon 8 Elite 上看到的性能飞跃，今年的做法尤其明显。

在显示屏方面，三星也在其 "小巧 "的旗舰平板电脑上做文章。600 cd/m² 左右的峰值亮度加上低频闪烁是三星Galaxy Tab S11+ 急需解决的问题。在这方面，MagicPad 2 或 MatePad Pro 12.2 等 OLED 竞争对手通过 1,500 cd/m² 和 4,000 Hz PWM 调光技术提供了更好的用户体验。

除此批评之外，Galaxy Tab S10+ 仍然是一款非常适合媒体消费的平板电脑，而且由于配备了出色的 s Pen，它非常适合作为学校或大学的数码伴侣。超长的更新支持和广泛的功能集也使Galaxy 平板电脑成为理想的工作设备。

Pros

+ 优质防水外壳
+ 性能卓越
+ 出色的扬声器
+ 更新时间长
+ 附带出色的 S Pen

Cons

- 节流
- 显示屏可以更亮
- 低 PWM
- 电池寿命可以更长

价格和供应情况

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 的 RRP 起价为 999 美元（256 GB 存储空间），可在亚马逊或制造商商店购买。.目前，将存储容量增加一倍至 512 GB 的总售价为 1,119 美元，而想要随时随地上网的用户则需要额外支付 130 美元购买 5G 版本。

Amazon Logo
$819.13
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10+ Plus 12.4” 256GB, Android Tablet, Circle to Search, Sketch to Image, Durability, Long Battery Life, AMOLED 2X Screen, S Pen Included, US Version, 2024, Moonstone Gray
  • $149.00
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Tablet 11” 64GB Android Tablet, Big Screen, Quad Speakers, Upgraded Chipset, Multi Window Display, Slim, Light, Durable Design, US Version, 2024, Graphite
  • $297.98
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE 10.9” 128GB WiFi Android Tablet, Large Display, Long Battery Life, Powerful Processor, S Pen, 8MP Camera, Lightweight Durable Design, Expandable Storage, US Version,2023, Gray

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
85.2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $819.13
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10+ Plus...
2. $149.00
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Table...
3. $297.98
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE 10....
List Price: 1119€		571 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash12.40"
2800x1752
266 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
2.
86.1%
OnePlus Pad 2
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon: $549.99
List Price: 549€		584 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.10"
3000x2120
304 PPI
IPS
3.
84.8%
Honor MagicPad 2
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $11.99
Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit...
2. $13.96
Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass...
3. $16.99
Vaxson 3-Pack Screen Protect...
List Price: 600€		555 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.30"
3000x1920
290 PPI
OLED
4.
89.3% v7 (old)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $628.00
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (256GB + 8...
2. $264.50
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve...
3. $264.00
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve...
List Price: 700€		590 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash12.40"
3048x2032
294 PPI
IPS
5.
91.3% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon: $699.99
List Price: 1269€		586 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash12.40"
2800x1752
266 PPI
AMOLED

与往年不同，Galaxy Tab S10+ 是 Tab S10 系列中最小的平板电脑。 平板电脑屏幕尺寸为 12.4 英寸。继 平板电脑与 Ultra 型号相比，它在一些方面有所不同，但也有许多相似之处。它采用了 联发科 Dimensity 9300+在 小米 14T Pro.

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 规格

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Galaxy Tab S10 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ 8 x 2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720
Graphics adapter
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
12.40 inch 16:10, 2800 x 1752 pixel 266 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, Digitizer, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 226 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB Type C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1,5 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast, DeX
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.6 x 285.4 x 185.4
Battery
10090 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.0, AF) + 8 MPix (f/2.2), camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.4, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: Quad-Audio, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, info material, One U 6.1, 24 Months Warranty, Single-Band-GNSS: GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou, QZSS, GPS; Widevine L1, HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, LDAC, SSC , fanless, waterproof
Weight
571 g
Price
1119 Euro
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

保护套 -Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 具有 IP 保护等级

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus，铂银色。
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus，铂银色。

除了颜色之外，Galaxy Tab S10+ 的设计与前代产品相同。 前代.甚至尺寸也几乎相同。通过 IP68 认证的防水外壳有月岩灰和铂银两种颜色。Tab S10+ 的厚度不到 6 毫米，感觉非常纤薄，工艺也符合高档平板电脑的标准。

这款 12.4 英寸三星 Tab 的外壳正面是大猩猩 5 号玻璃，背面是铝合金。后者的磨砂表面具有良好的防指纹效果。

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus Notebookckeck 评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus Notebookckeck 评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus Notebookckeck 评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus Notebookckeck 评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus Notebookckeck 评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus Notebookckeck 评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）

尺寸比较

❌
285.4 mm 185.4 mm 5.7 mm 586 g285.4 mm 185.4 mm 5.6 mm 571 g278.7 mm 191.58 mm 6.26 mm 590 g274.5 mm 180.5 mm 5.8 mm 555 g268.7 mm 195 mm 6.49 mm 584 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

功能 - 三星平板电脑配备 USB 3.2

Galaxy Tab S10+ 拥有四扬声器系统、手写笔支持、Miracast、光学指纹传感器、最高 1.5 TB 的 microSD 卡和 exFAT 支持，为平板电脑提供了完善的配套。此外，三星 DeX UI 和 Knox Vault 平台还为敏感数据配备了专用处理器。借助 USB OTG，记忆棒可以轻松连接到设备上。

在通过 USB 3.2 端口（第一代）进行的测试中，我们使用三星 980 Pro（M2.SSD 硬盘）测得的数据传输速度高达 318 MB/s。连接的存储介质可使用 NTFS（只读）或 exFAT 格式化。借助适配器，USB 端口还可用作外部显示器的图像信号输出。

microSD 读卡器

与我们的参考卡 Angelbird V60 搭配使用时，Galaxy Tab S10+ 的复制速度令人满意。虽然前代产品在我们的测试中表现略胜一筹，但 48 MB/s 的实测速度仍然是一个不错的成绩。在 CPDT 中，三星平板电脑的 microSD 性能也非常稳定。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (Angelbird V60)
51.6 MB/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
47.52 MB/s
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=59, last 2 years)
34.4 MB/s -28%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø33.3 (23.7-41.8)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø42.5 (27.8-54.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø57.5 (44.7-71.3)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.7 (49.7-93.4)

软件 -Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 提供长时间更新

Galaxy Tab S10+ 预装了Android 14 和内部用户界面 OneUI 6.1 版，包括Galaxy AI。在测试时，Android 安全补丁是截至 2024 年 11 月的最新版本。与 Galaxy S24 FE一样，也承诺了长达 7 年的操作系统和安全更新周期。根据制造商的说法，安全更新将每月推出一次，但具体在哪个时间段还不清楚。

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 笔记本评测
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 笔记本评测
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 笔记本评测
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 笔记本评测

可持续性

我们无法找到有关Galaxy 平板电脑可持续发展的确切信息，但与智能手机一样，制造商很可能会使用由回收材料制成的部件，包括再利用塑料、铝、玻璃材料和稀土。该平板电脑的 前代产品的制造商规格为约 150 kgCO₂ eq。Galaxy Tab S10+ 的包装由再生纸制成，边框周围还有一层薄膜。

通信和全球导航卫星系统

Galaxy Tab 系列的 Plus 型号仍然只配备了 Wi-Fi 6E 标准，而不是现代的 WiFi 7。不过，Wi-Fi 传输使用的是 6 千兆赫频段。这意味着华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 可以实现非常高且相对稳定的传输速度。我们测得的峰值接近 1,800 Mbit/s。不过，即使使用 WiFi 6 路由器，使用 5 Ghz 频段也能达到 1,000 Mbit/s 的高平均 Wi-Fi 速度。

我们的评测设备是 Wi-Fi 版本，但Galaxy Tab S10+ 也有 5G 版本可供选择。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
994 (974min - 1012max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Wi-Fi 7
953 (870min - 981max) MBit/s -4%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (305 - 1757, n=122)
870 MBit/s -12%
Honor MagicPad 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
867 (453min - 934max) MBit/s -13%
Average of class Tablet
  (10.5 - 1710, n=83, last 2 years)
540 MBit/s -46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
956 (844min - 986max) MBit/s
Honor MagicPad 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
937 (892min - 952max) MBit/s -2%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (234 - 1696, n=120)
834 MBit/s -13%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Wi-Fi 7
778 (542min - 819max) MBit/s -19%
Average of class Tablet
  (20.1 - 1705, n=83, last 2 years)
522 MBit/s -45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1759 (1709min - 1788max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Wi-Fi 7
1620 (1070min - 1792max) MBit/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Wi-Fi 6E
1518 (1344min - 1577max) MBit/s -14%
Average of class Tablet
  (691 - 1888, n=14, last 2 years)
1368 MBit/s -22%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (770 - 1902, n=18)
1294 MBit/s -26%
OnePlus Pad 2
Wi-Fi 7
895 (675min - 1017max) MBit/s -49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1782 (936min - 1875max) MBit/s
OnePlus Pad 2
Wi-Fi 7
1652 (1472min - 1703max) MBit/s -7%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Wi-Fi 7
1437 (1239min - 1549max) MBit/s -19%
Average of class Tablet
  (666 - 1842, n=16, last 2 years)
1351 MBit/s -24%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (666 - 1816, n=20)
1166 MBit/s -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Wi-Fi 6E
1006 (859min - 1153max) MBit/s -44%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1759 (1709-1788)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1518 (1344-1577)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1746 (936-1875)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1006 (859-1153)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø994 (974-1012)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø953 (844-986)
室外地点
室外地点

尽管 12.4 英寸的平板电脑注定不能用于导航，但我们还是用 Garmin Venu 2 记录了一条路线，以作比较。幸运的是，Wi-Fi 版的Galaxy Tab 也能与卫星网络建立连接，但卫星定位需要很长时间，而且无法在建筑物内定位。如果您一直在寻找一款用于汽车旅行的超大导航系统，那么 Tab S10+ 肯定能满足您的需求，因为它的定位精度实际上非常高。

Garmin Vernu 2 vs.Galaxy Tab S10+
Garmin Vernu 2 vs.Galaxy Tab S10+

摄像头 - 三星平板电脑配备双摄像头

与三星Galaxy Tab S10+ 自拍合影
与三星Galaxy Tab S10+ 自拍合影

安装在显示屏上方边框中的 1200 万像素摄像头采用 f/2.4 光圈和固定焦距。这样在日光下也能获得非常实用的效果。主摄像头具有自动对焦功能，其 1300 万像素的图像传感器可拍摄出更好的照片。

平板电脑是否需要后置超广角摄像头值得商榷，但使用 Tab S10 Plus 拍摄大型文档的照片是可行的。不过，800 万像素的镜头并不适合拍摄更多的照片。

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
5x
5x
8 倍（最大值）
8 倍（最大值）
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 笔记本评测
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 笔记本评测
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 笔记本评测
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 笔记本评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angle Wide angleLow lightZoom 5xUltra-wide-angle
ColorChecker
1.7 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+: 5.26 ∆E min: 1.69 - max: 9.29 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.9 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
49 ∆E
38 ∆E
77.6 ∆E
44 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+: 47.55 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 93.71 ∆E

配件和保修 -Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 配备 S Pen

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 的可选配件（图片来源：三星）
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 的可选配件（图片来源：三星）

购买后，平板电脑的超薄包装盒已经显示没有附带电源适配器。除了一根 USB 线和 SIM 卡工具外，包装盒内只有一些信息资料和三星 S Pen。与之配套的带有全新Galaxy AI 按钮的 Book Cover 键盘需要单独购买（零售价：199 美元）。

三星的高端平板电脑提供 24 个月的保修服务。 保修可选择 Care+ 保险套餐（零售价：69 美元）作为补充。

输入设备和操作 - 三星平板电脑配备了指纹传感器

使用手指和 S Pen 都可以进行精确操作。得益于高达 120 Hz 的高刷新率，输入毫无延迟，大屏幕也让使用三星手写笔手写笔记变得非常容易。S Pen 的手感很好，在快速移动时，屏幕几乎不会落后于触控笔尖。Galaxy

光学指纹传感器位于平板电脑右侧的显示屏中。用拇指很容易触及传感器区域。解锁工作可靠而快速。还可通过前置摄像头进行 2D 面部识别。

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 笔记本评测
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 笔记本评测

显示屏 -Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 采用 OLED 显示屏

OLED 显示屏拥有一个 RG/BG 子像素矩阵，由一个红光二极管、一个蓝光二极管和一个绿光二极管组成。
OLED 显示屏拥有一个 RG/BG 子像素矩阵，由一个红光二极管、一个蓝光二极管和一个绿光二极管组成。

Galaxy Tab S10+ 的动态 AMOLED 2X 面板分辨率为 2,800 x 1,752 像素，从而实现了经典的 16:10 长宽比。这一分辨率也足以实现 266 ppi 的像素密度。120 Hz OLED 面板还支持 HDR10+，但我们在 APL18 测试中测得的 631 cd/m² 的峰值亮度并不高。对于 HDR 内容，我们也测得了非常相似的亮度。这意味着高对比度效果在三星平板电脑的屏幕上非常有限。

三星使用脉宽调制来控制显示亮度。闪烁是 OLED 屏幕的典型特征，波动频率约为 240 Hz。由于频率较低，我们不能排除对此类问题敏感的人可能会对此产生不满。

476
cd/m²		476
cd/m²		480
cd/m²
469
cd/m²		471
cd/m²		477
cd/m²
467
cd/m²		465
cd/m²		477
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 480 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 473.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.04 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 471 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.06
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2800x1752, 12.4"		OnePlus Pad 2
IPS, 3000x2120, 12.1"		Honor MagicPad 2
OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3"		Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
IPS, 3048x2032, 12.4"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.4"
Screen
29%
38%
27%
11%
Brightness middle
471
833
77%
645
37%
867
84%
574
22%
Brightness
473
771
63%
650
37%
810
71%
551
16%
Brightness Distribution
97
84
-13%
94
-3%
87
-10%
89
-8%
Black Level *
0.45
0.58
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.1
1.79
42%
1.3
58%
2
35%
2.01
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.8
4.01
31%
2.1
64%
5.5
5%
4.93
15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
3
-25%
1.5
37%
3
-25%
2.8
-17%
Gamma
2.06 107%
2.254 98%
2.25 98%
2.29 96%
2.066 106%
CCT
6746 96%
6419 101%
6658 98%
6957 93%
6566 99%
Contrast
1851
1495

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 18.52 %
Secondary Frequency: 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

使用固定的缩放级别和不同的亮度设置进行了一系列测量（最低亮度时的振幅曲线相对平坦。不过，这都是缩放造成的。在信息框中，您可以找到最小亮度下振幅的放大版本）

我们使用卡尔曼分析软件和照片光谱仪检查了色彩校准。有两种配置文件可供选择，包括白平衡选项。在最佳情况下（配置文件：Vivid），与 P3 色彩空间的偏差在目标范围内（<3）。

色彩准确度（配置文件：鲜艳、冷色，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩准确度（配置文件：鲜艳、冷色，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩空间（轮廓：鲜艳、冷色，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩空间（轮廓：鲜艳、冷色，目标色彩空间：P3）
灰度（轮廓：鲜艳、冷色，目标色彩空间：P3）
灰度（轮廓：鲜艳、冷色，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：鲜艳，冷色，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：鲜艳，冷色，目标色彩空间：P3）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7275 ms rise
↘ 0.7445 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7365 ms rise
↘ 0.6905 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

新颖之处在于，三星在Galaxy Tab S10 系列的 OLED 屏幕上覆盖了一层防反射涂层。这样做的目的是最大限度地减少恼人的眩光并降低其反射率。与 前几代相比，有轻微但明显的差异，但户外清晰度仍与华为 PaperMatte 显示屏.不过，在阴凉处，Galaxy Tab S10+ 用户应该可以享受无限制的使用，即使是在炎炎夏日。OLED 面板具有非常好的可视角度。

性能 - 三星平板电脑搭载联发科 SoC 芯片

与 前代Galaxy Tab S10 系列没有采用高通 SoC，而是选择了联发科版本。屏幕 Dimensity 9300+由台积电（TSMC）采用 4 纳米工艺制造，配备了 Immortalis G720 MP12以及联发科 APU 790 作为 GPU 和 NPU 单元。CPU 内核的组成与 Dimensity 9300相比并无差异。

在 CPU 基准测试中，Dimensity 9300 的 plus 型号大多领先于 骁龙 8 代 2Galaxy的 Galaxy Tab S9+.不过，唯一的优势可以从 Geekbench 多核跑分中看出。在人工智能测试中，结果波动相当严重。

Geekbench 6.3 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (2167 - 2192, n=3)
2182 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2167 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
2107 Points -3%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1986 Points -8%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1924 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=70, last 2 years)
1111 Points -49%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
954 Points -56%
Multi-Core
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (6972 - 7327, n=3)
7131 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7094 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5652 Points -20%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
5176 Points -27%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5166 Points -27%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4564 Points -36%
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=70, last 2 years)
3544 Points -50%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1632 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (1598 - 1639, n=3)
1623 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1566 Points -4%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1477 Points -9%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1447 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet
  (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points -57%
Multi-Core
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (6478 - 7077, n=3)
6744 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
6678 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5198 Points -22%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
4548 Points -32%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4460 Points -33%
Average of class Tablet
  (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2494 Points -63%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (1726681 - 2088406, n=3)
1949404 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1726681 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1516127 Points -12%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1432569 Points -17%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2716980, n=37, last 2 years)
781418 Points -55%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
17329 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
17267 Points +3%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
16960 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
16684 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (16053 - 16743, n=3)
16493 Points -1%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12156 Points -27%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9847 Points -41%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1342 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1277 Points -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (956 - 1367, n=3)
1222 Points -9%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1155 Points -14%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1153 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
773 Points -42%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (11606 - 11976, n=3)
11768 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
11606 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9147 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
8886 Points -23%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
8483 Points -27%
Average of class Tablet
  (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)
4205 Points -64%
System
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (15367 - 16435, n=3)
15846 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
15736 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
13730 Points -13%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13141 Points -16%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
12668 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet
  (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)
7265 Points -54%
Memory
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
10977 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
10633 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (10000 - 11254, n=3)
10629 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
10049 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
8890 Points -16%
Average of class Tablet
  (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)
4862 Points -54%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
57192 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (56004 - 58323, n=3)
57173 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
31688 Points -45%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
25642 Points -55%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
23041 Points -60%
Average of class Tablet
  (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)
9168 Points -84%
Web
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (1938 - 2051, n=3)
2009 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1938 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1893 Points -2%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1766 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1612 Points -17%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)
1269 Points -35%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
74821 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (55033 - 74821, n=3)
68097 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16134 Points -78%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
14961 Points -80%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13900 Points -81%
Average of class Tablet
  (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)
11323 Points -85%
AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
156427 Points +185%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
54948 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (43121 - 55794, n=3)
51288 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)
7290 Points -87%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1231 Points -98%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1118 Points -98%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1225 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (976 - 1243, n=3)
1148 Points -6%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1065 Points -13%
Average of class Tablet
  (243 - 1243, n=8, last 2 years)
705 Points -42%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
243 Points -80%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
5176 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (4189 - 5204, n=3)
4856 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet
  (227 - 5204, n=8, last 2 years)
1683 Points -67%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
981 Points -81%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
227 Points -96%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
4998 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (3975 - 4998, n=3)
4647 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet
  (508 - 4998, n=8, last 2 years)
2014 Points -60%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1693 Points -66%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
508 Points -90%

撠 Immortalis G720 MP12Tab S10+ 中的 Immortalis G720 MP12 比前代产品 前代Adreno 740尽管高通公司的这一图形处理器是在 2022 年上市的。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5289 Points
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4454 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3684 Points -30%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3218 Points -39%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3088 Points -42%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5236 Points
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4485 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3710 Points -29%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3421 Points -35%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3301 Points -37%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18352 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12985 Points -29%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12952 Points -29%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8315 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8132 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5630 Points -31%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5468 Points -33%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4876 Points -40%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8321 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8201 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5623 Points -31%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5458 Points -33%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4887 Points -40%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1894 Points
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1626 Points -14%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1071 Points -43%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1965 Points
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1639 Points -17%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1090 Points -45%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7451 Points
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7196 Points -3%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6219 Points -17%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5627 Points -24%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28816 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24769 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21647 Points -13%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20808 Points -16%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17279 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16323 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13954 Points -15%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13009 Points -20%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
144 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
767 fps
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
520 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
493 fps -36%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
397 fps -48%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
321 fps +23%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
265 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
261 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
249 fps -5%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps -9%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps -40%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
226 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
219 fps
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
200 fps -9%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps -17%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps -18%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps -46%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -46%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
135 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
132 fps -2%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
110 fps -19%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps -21%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -24%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -37%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps -48%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -48%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps -11%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps -22%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps -24%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps -14%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps -38%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -42%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps -45%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
176 fps
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
170 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
159 fps -10%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
146 fps -17%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps -18%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps -17%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26 fps -26%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps -31%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)
196.271 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
177.483 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
176.366 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (77.7 - 184, n=3)
146.4 Points -18%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
134.356 Points -24%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)
111.2 Points -37%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
256 runs/min
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
225 runs/min -12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (138 - 264, n=3)
219 runs/min -14%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
197 runs/min -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)
195 runs/min -24%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)
121.9 runs/min -52%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
15.2 runs/min
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=26, last 2 years)
13.1 runs/min -14%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
12.2 runs/min -20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (6.55 - 15.2, n=3)
12.2 runs/min -20%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
11.9 runs/min -22%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
190 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)
187 Points -2%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
167 Points -12%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
155 Points -18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (78 - 193, n=3)
153.7 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)
106.9 Points -44%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
67938 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)
64715 Points -5%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
64638 Points -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (25646 - 71054, n=3)
54879 Points -19%
OnePlus Pad 2 (Chrome 128)
45083 Points -34%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
42032 Points -38%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)
29371 Points -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)
3734 ms * -484%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (632 - 2124, n=3)
1132 ms * -77%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
842.2 ms * -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
639.3 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)
635.1 ms * +1%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
602 ms * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+OnePlus Pad 2Honor MagicPad 2Xiaomi Pad 6S ProSamsung Galaxy Tab S9+Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
42%
66%
145%
100%
114%
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB
3574.3
2003.1
-44%
2025.54
-43%
3465.72
-3%
3413.8
-4%
3608 ?(3249 - 4384, n=26)
1%
1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years)
-71%
Sequential Write 256KB
554.67
1732.7
212%
2003.53
261%
3154.3
469%
2528.2
356%
2530 ?(555 - 3348, n=26)
356%
686 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years)
24%
Random Read 4KB
218.43
236.5
8%
298.27
37%
381.97
75%
450.3
106%
406 ?(218 - 483, n=26)
86%
189.4 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years)
-13%
Random Write 4KB
374.09
348.6
-7%
401.95
7%
510.95
37%
161.3
-57%
421 ?(152.9 - 730, n=26)
13%
189.9 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years)
-49%

游戏 - 三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 可达到 120fps

我们测试的Android 游戏运行流畅，没有任何明显问题。使用GameBench应用程序，我们仔细观察了三星平板电脑每秒能达到多少帧，以及是否能进行 HFR 游戏。在我们的测试中，Tab S10+ 在低画质下最高能达到 120fps，而在中等画质下只能达到约 60fps。

Geshin Impact
Geshin Impact
死亡扳机 2
死亡扳机 2
PUBG 手机
PUBG 手机
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+; Dead Trigger 2: Ø60 (59-61)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø59.8 (51-60)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø58.5 (50-60)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø111.9 (87-120)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (49-60)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.7 (29-49)

排放--三星平板电脑有一些热点

温度

我们记录到的表面温度差异很大；在一个热点区域，Galaxy Tab S10+ 甚至超过了 50 度大关。不过，在绝大多数时间里，机箱都保持着凉爽宜人的温度。

Max. Load
 49.7 °C51.6 °C36.2 °C 
 34.8 °C38.2 °C30.9 °C 
 34.6 °C34.3 °C32.3 °C 
Maximum: 51.6 °C
Average: 38.1 °C
34.7 °C43.2 °C48.1 °C
31.4 °C35.1 °C37.9 °C
30.2 °C33.8 °C32.9 °C
Maximum: 48.1 °C
Average: 36.4 °C
Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.6 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.1 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91.9 % +45%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 % +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.9 % +22%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.6 % +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63.2 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91.3 % +53%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89.3 % +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
87.4 % +47%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83.8 % +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.5 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.8 % +53%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.8 % +53%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
93.7 % +44%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.9 % +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.1 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.9 % +55%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.5 % +40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61.9 %
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.6 (17.7-29.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22.2 (20.5-23.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø64.9 (58.9-93.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø68.1 (60.6-78.8)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø68.1 (60.1-107.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø18.2 (16.5-25.8)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø17.8 (16.1-24.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø18.3 (18.2-18.3)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.17 (8.34-13.5)

发言人

三星平板电脑使用四个扬声器，可提供出色的音场和丰富的层次感。低音并不明显，但粉红噪声显示出中高音的线性频率。如果你想获得外部声音输出，可以使用 USB 连接（有线）或蓝牙 5.3（无线）。不过，蓝牙 5.3 使用的编解码器范围有限。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.439.62531.832.83129.932.34030.926.95037.939.66329.728.28021.437.410021.347.212520.352.1160176420015.463.325013.367.631512.969.840012.768.250011.373.163011.972.580011.97410001375.5125012.875.3160012.374.6200014.569.7250013.165.8315013.469.940001375.8500013.475.7630013.975.8800013.6731000013.766.71250013.359.21600012.862.8SPL25.485.6N0.769.8median 13.3median 69.8Delta1.2537.232.535.834.532.830.931.531.534.436.125.330.523.537.420.245.717.149.115.552.915.654.6205912.461.610.26511.265.811.765.712.568.311.87011.472.810.967.711.266.111.768.112.371.712.875.213.570.814.26714.970.515.668.116.562.517.356.925.182.20.655median 12.8median 66.12.36hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池运行时间 -Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 充电速度仍然很慢

耗电量

作为一款 12.4 英寸的平板电脑，它的功耗还算不错，不过 前代产品更省钱一些。10,090 毫安时的电池仍然只能通过有线连接以 45 瓦特的功率充电，这意味着用 小米移动电源 25000充电大约需要 100 分钟。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.14 / 0.36 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.05 / 4.57 / 4.65 Watt
Load midlight 13.35 / 15.55 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
10090 mAh		Honor MagicPad 2
10050 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
10000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
10090 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
-11%
-14%
7%
17%
21%
Idle Minimum *
3.05
3.6
-18%
1.22
60%
3.4
-11%
2.45 ?(0.95 - 3.34, n=3)
20%
1.829 ?(0.63 - 6.5, n=67, last 2 years)
40%
Idle Average *
4.57
6.52
-43%
7.18
-57%
3.6
21%
3.59 ?(1.2 - 5, n=3)
21%
3.81 ?(1 - 9.2, n=67, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Maximum *
4.65
6.54
-41%
8.22
-77%
3.9
16%
3.68 ?(1.27 - 5.11, n=3)
21%
4.35 ?(1.3 - 15.3, n=67, last 2 years)
6%
Load Average *
13.35
10.63
20%
13.63
-2%
11.7
12%
10.7 ?(5.95 - 13.4, n=3)
20%
9.45 ?(2.5 - 44.9, n=67, last 2 years)
29%
Load Maximum *
15.55
11.57
26%
14.56
6%
15.8
-2%
15.2 ?(14 - 15.9, n=3)
2%
13.3 ?(3.9 - 54.8, n=67, last 2 years)
14%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø11.2 (3.96-15.6)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.88 (3.4-15.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.96 (3.83-6.24)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.72 (3.61-3.96)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13.9 (6.62-15.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.5 (11.7-15.8)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.96 (3.83-6.24)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.72 (3.61-3.96)

电池寿命

在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，三星平板电脑的电池续航时间达到了约 8.5 小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 130)
8h 22min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
10090 mAh
502 min
OnePlus Pad 2
9510 mAh
866 min
Honor MagicPad 2
10050 mAh
606 min
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
10000 mAh
959 min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
10090 mAh
584 min

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Galaxy Tab S10+ 如果能在细节上再多花点心思，肯定会有不错的表现。今年，三星似乎并没有把太多精力放在其高端平板电脑上。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ - 11/15/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
92 / 98 → 94%
Keyboard
70 / 80 → 88%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
64 / 69 → 93%
Weight
82 / 40-88 → 88%
Battery
82%
Display
88%
Games Performance
37 / 65 → 57%
Application Performance
72 / 92 → 79%
AI Performance
76%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
88 / 91 → 97%
Camera
64 / 90 → 71%
Average
73%
85%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
91.2%
Repairability
80%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 61.9%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 人工智能平板电脑的显示屏有问题--三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2024-11-18 (Update: 2024-11-18)