Notebookcheck Logo
Notebookcheck Xiaomi 14T Pro smartphone review

小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测:亮度惊人的价格杀手

连环画爱好者的完美智能手机

小米公司将其 14T Pro 视为高端智能手机,售价不到 800 欧元(约合 867 美元)。在我们的测试中,这款小米智能手机配备了徕卡摄像头,其 144Hz AMOLED 显示面板显示出极高的亮度。这款旗舰杀手手机的其他配置也几乎没有让人失望。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone

小米 14T Pro 的评价

通过 14T Pro,小米成功地打造了一款非常出色的高级智能手机,很有可能成为旗舰杀手。与前代产品相比,14T Pro 在设备上弥补了一些较小的不足(没有无线充电、前置摄像头没有 UHD 选项),照片质量也有了明显改善,尤其是在变焦拍摄方面。旗舰级硬件(120 瓦快速充电、UFS 4.0 存储、DDR5x 内存、IP68 等)与市场上可能最亮显示屏之一的结合,售价不到 800 欧元(约合 867 美元)。它采用的联发科 Dimensity 9300+ 处理器也与目前的高端智能手机处于同一水平。

很难理解为什么小米在其高端智能手机中继续使用蹩脚的 USB 2.0 连接。重视图像输出或快速数据传输的用户可以在Galaxy S24+ 或 Pixel 9 上找到合适的替代品。此外,三星和谷歌还提供了稍长一些的软件支持期,尽管 14T Pro 的支持期为 5 年,但一点也不差。有点遗憾的是,这款智能手机的包装盒中并没有附带相应的快速充电器,因为几乎没有人会已经拥有一个支持 HyperCharge 的充电器。

只要 14T Pro 的价格接近小米 14,我们就会明确推荐购买 T 机型。对于那些对无线充电、120 瓦 HyperCharge 或旗舰 SoC 等高端功能并不那么看重的用户,也可以看看我们对 14T Pro 的评测。

Pros

+ 明亮的 OLED 面板
+ 高品质防水外壳
+ 良好的设备
+ 快速充电
+ 性能强大
+ 良好的主摄像头

Cons

- 仅 USB 2.0
- 高节流
- 无 LTPO 面板

价格和供应情况

例如,全球版的小米 14T Pro 在美国亚马逊的售价为720 美元起。在英国,您也可以直接从制造商处购买,价格为 649 英镑。

Amazon Logo
$8.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi 14T Pro Screen Protector, 9H Hardness Anti-Scratch Tempered Glass flim,Anti-Scratch (2 +2PACK)
  • $6.95
    Mr.Shield Screen Protector compatible with Xiaomi 14T / Xiaomi 14T Pro [Tempered Glass] [3-Pack] [Japan Glass with 9H Hardness]
  • $9.99
    for Xiaomi 14T Pro Screen Protector,[2+4 Pack] Tempered Glass Screen Protector+Camera Lens Protector,No Bubbles,Anti-Scratch,Case Friendly
Bestpreis 759€ alza.at
Xiaomi 14T Pro 1TB Titan Gray
2. 759.99 € patshop9
3. 772 € Gomibo.at
4. 779 € Gomibo.de

潜在的竞争对手比较

Image
Model / Review
Geizhals
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
84.8%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Bestpreis 759€ alza.at
2. 759.99€ patshop9
3. 772€ Gomibo.at
209 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED
2.
89.8% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Bestpreis 799€ Gomibo.de
2. 822.68€ electronis.de
3. 822.69€ 0815.eu
196 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"
3120x1440
513 PPI
AMOLED
3.
88.1%
OnePlus 12
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Bestpreis 657€ Coolblue
2. 718.2€ galaxus.at
3. 730.83€ Jacob Elektronik direkt
220 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"
3168x1440
510 PPI
AMOLED
4.
80.5%
Honor 200 Pro
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Bestpreis 494€ Gomibo.at
2. 498.98€ Jacob Elektronik direkt
3. 498.99€ electronis.de
199 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2700x1224
437 PPI
OLED
5.
88.1% v7 (old)
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Bestpreis 479€ nullprozentshop.de
2. 479€ Alternate
3. 479€ galaxus
206 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED

小米的 T 系列14T Pro 采用超高亮度的 144Hz AMOLED 面板,HDR 最高亮度超过 4000 尼特,搭载全新的 联发科 Dimensity 9300+也不例外。此外,人工智能当然也是继 13T Pro.

新旗舰杀手的亮点之一应该是配备 Light Fusion 900 图像传感器的全新徕卡 Summilux 镜头。 小米 14.不过,凭借 120 瓦 HyperCharge 快充、3D IceLoop 冷却和智能 AI 通信系统,14T Pro 还拥有几张王牌。

在德国,这款小米高端智能手机的建议零售价约为 800 欧元(约合 867 美元)。我们的测试将揭晓这是否会让购买 14T Pro 成为一个毫无疑问的决定。

Xiaomi 14T Pro (14T Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ 8 x 2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 446 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, HDR (HLG, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDR10), glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash, 1024 GB 
, 974 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, compass, barometer, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B48/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n25/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n48/​n66/​n75/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.39 x 160.4 x 75.1
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/​1.6, OIS, 1/1.31", videos @4320p/​30fps, @1080p/​960fps) + 50 MP (f/​1.9, telephoto lens, 60mm) + 12 MP (f/​2.2, wide angle lens), camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2,0, 25 mm, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, USB cable, case, info material, HyperOS, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value: 0.376W/​kg - head, 0.798W/​kg - body, Widevine L1, GNSS: Beidou: B1I + B1C+B2a|GPS: L1+L5|Galileo: E1+E5a GLONASS: G1|QZSS: L1+L5, SBAS, BT codecs SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LHDC V5, fanless, waterproof
Weight
209 g
Price
1000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

手机壳 - 小米 14T Pro 具备防水功能

小米 14T Pro(右)与小米 14T 的对比
小米 14T Pro(右)与小米 14T 的对比

14T Pro 的 IP68 认证证明,这款有三种颜色可供选择的手机壳还具有防水和防尘功能。T 系列的设计 T 系列今年的设计没有太大变化,2024 型号的棱角仅比 13T Pro.与前代产品相比,6.67 英寸 OLED 面板周围的边框明显变小了。这使得显示屏的屏占比更高,达到了 89.1%,同时也意味着尺寸比前代产品略有缩小。尽管小米官方并未就此发表任何声明,但据说大猩猩 Victus 可保护显示屏免受划伤。

小米 14T Pro 的颜色选择
小米 14T Pro 的颜色选择

背面也采用了玻璃材质,与铝合金制成的金属边框相结合,给人一种高品质的感觉。由于其表面略显哑光,因此几乎不会留下指纹。我们测试机的做工堪称一流,按键在边框中紧贴舒适。

小米 14T Pro 智能手机笔记本评测
小米 14T Pro 智能手机笔记本评测
小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测
小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测
小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测
小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测
小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测
小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测
小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测

尺寸比较

164.3 mm 75.8 mm 9.2 mm 220 g163.3 mm 75.2 mm 8.2 mm 199 g162.2 mm 75.7 mm 8.62 mm 206 g160.4 mm 75.1 mm 8.39 mm 209 g158.5 mm 75.9 mm 7.7 mm 196 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 可选 1 TB 容量的小米智能手机

存储选项及其相应的价格(MSRP)与上一代产品相比保持不变 前代.采用 LPDDR5X 和 UFS 4.0 规格的当前小米高端智能手机的可用存储版本如下:

小米 14T Pro

小米 14T Pro

小米 14T Pro

12 GB + 256 GB

12 GB + 512 GB

12 GB + 1 TB

799.90 欧元(约合 867 美元)

899.90 欧元(约合人民币 975 元)

999.90 欧元(约合 1,084 美元)

其他设备也没有较大变化。包括 NFC、蓝牙 5.4、USB-OTG、Miracast 和红外爆破器。没有 UWB 芯片。速度较慢的 USB 标准(2.0)不支持有线图像输出,仍然是一般高端产品的差异化特征。对于 2024 年的高端智能手机来说,这令人失望,尽管小米不是唯一的制造商,因为其他制造商如 AppleHonor等厂商在这一价位也仍在使用速度较慢的 USB 标准。在我们使用三星 980 Pro(M2.SSD 硬盘)进行的拷贝测试中,USB 端口的传输速率仅为 50 MB/s,尽管这对于 2.0 标准来说已经非常不错了。14T Pro 支持 exFAT 文件格式和 NTFS,后者是微软系统的首选。

用户的敏感信息,如生物识别数据和密码,由智能手机上的专用内置芯片组来保护,据制造商称,这样可以提供额外的保护,防止恶意软件的未经授权访问。

机箱右侧(按键:开/关、音量)
机箱右侧(按键:开/关、音量)
箱体左侧
箱体左侧
底部(扬声器、USB 端口、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽)
底部(扬声器、USB 端口、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽)
顶部(麦克风、红外热像仪)
顶部(麦克风、红外热像仪)

软件 - 小米 14T Pro 使用Android 14

14T Pro 搭载了制造商自己的 HyperOS,它基于当前的Android 14。在本次测试时,安全补丁处于 2024 年 9 月的水平。根据小米的说法,5 年内应该会有更新,但 14T Pro 最后一次大规模Android 升级可能会提前一年,即在 2028 年。由此可见,这家中国制造商提供的支持期限还是不错的。 三星谷歌在这方面提供了更持久的支持。此外,安全更新应该是每季度一次,这样也会更好。

随着 14T 系列的推出,三星与谷歌的独家协议正在继续瓦解,因为除了 Honor 智能手机之外,小米智能手机也支持 Circle to Search。此外,小米 14T Pro 还引入了众多其他 AI 功能。现在,所有的内置应用似乎都与 AI 有关,至少 AI 翻译器、AI 笔记、AI 翻译器和 AI 录音机(这还不是全部)的名称给人这样的印象。小米还在发货状态下预装了谷歌双子星应用。

小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测
小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测
小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测
小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测
小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测

可持续性

小米没有提供关于所用材料及其回收配额的任何详细细节,但该制造商表示,包括铝、金和铜在内的可回收材料正越来越多地用于其所有智能手机。在智能手机和配件中使用生物基高分子材料以及从废弃渔网中回收的塑料,也是为了尽可能减少生态足迹。14T Pro 的包装似乎没有使用塑料,尽管设备本身是用铝箔纸包裹的。包装的其余部分由纸板制成。小米还公布了 14T 系列的可持续发展报告,其中可能会包含更多细节。

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 技术的小米智能手机

通过 WiFi 7,14T Pro 不仅支持现代的 "be "标准,还支持快速的 6 GHz 频段。看看 混合翻盖显示,后者并非必然。在使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试中,我们测得的最高速度接近 1900 Mbit/s。高数据传输速率也基本保持稳定。

14T Pro 包含小米自行开发的小米 Surge T1 Tuner。除了 WLAN 和 GPS 外,它还能处理移动通信信号并对其进行改进。这款高端智能手机可以接入 5G 标准的移动数据网络(如果有的话),而且频率多,接收和发送通道各为四个(4x4 MIMO)。4G 网络的频段支持也非常好,支持德语国家地区的所有相关频率。14T Pro 拥有 22 个 LTE 频段,在国外旅行时也能得心应手。

Networking
Xiaomi 14T Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
931 (min: 471) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
986 (min: 498) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1894 (min: 956) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1695 (min: 1643) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
iperf3 receive AXE11000
648 (min: 582) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
859 (min: 401) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1581 (min: 1247) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1117 (min: 1031) MBit/s ∼66%
OnePlus 12
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1857 (min: 1766) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1119 (min: 1086) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor 200 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
828 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
944 (min: 483) MBit/s ∼84%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
968 (min: 948) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
988 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1857 (min: 934) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1686 (min: 1654) MBit/s ∼99%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
711 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
725 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1443 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1387 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼82%
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1862 (956-1933)
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1826 (934-1883)
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1692 (1643-1720)
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1683 (1654-1717)
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø913 (471-969)
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø966 (948-979)
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø969 (498-1013)
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø972 (494-1008)
小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测
小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测

智能手机通过双频全球导航卫星系统确定自己的位置。14T Pro 支持 GPS (L1+L5)、Glonass (L1)、Galileo (E1+E5)、BeiDou (B1+B2) 和 SBAS 卫星网络。卫星定位非常迅速,全球导航卫星系统模块在室内也非常精确。

为了确定通过卫星定位的准确性,我们带着智能手机进行了一次短途自行车旅行,同时还带上了 Garmin Venu 2 作为对比设备。在我们的实际测试中,小米手机表现出了相当高的准确度,尽管在改变方向时我们可以看到一些较小的误差。14T Pro 时不时会偏离我们的路线。但由于这只是一些小的偏差,我们也可以推荐小米智能手机用于要求较高的导航任务。

Xaiomi 14T Pro 对 Garmin Venu 2
Xaiomi 14T Pro 对 Garmin Venu 2

手机功能和语音质量 - 小米 14T Pro 支持双 SIM 卡。

小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测
小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测

小米 14T Pro 在通话方面提供了无忧套餐。该机支持全双卡双待,卡槽可容纳两张 Nano-SIM 卡,还可选择使用 eSIM 卡。此外,还提供 VoLTE 和 WLAN 通话等功能。

使用听筒通话的音质也令人信服。通话对方的声音听起来很清晰,我们自己的声音也能通过麦克风清晰地传递。尽管使用免提电话时通话对方的声音听起来比较尖锐,但声音仍然清晰易懂。

相机 - 带有徕卡品牌的小米智能手机

使用小米 14T Pro 拍摄的肖像照片
使用小米 14T Pro 拍摄的肖像照片

14T Pro 的前置镜头为 3200 万像素镜头,不使用像素宾尼法,采用固定焦距。它拍摄的照片仍然非常吸引人,而且照明效果明显好于以往。4K30 选项可用于视频录制。

背面的主摄像头使用了具有 f/1.6 大光圈的徕卡 Vario Summilux 镜头和 OmniVision 的 Light Vision 900 图像传感器(OVX9000)。可供选择的风格包括 "Leica Authentic "和 "Leica Vivid",以及全新的徕卡滤镜。我们在测试中使用的是 Leica Vivid 风格。

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
2.6x
2.6x
5x
5x
10x
10x
20x
20x
30 倍(最大值)
30 倍(最大值)

虽然 1/1.31 英寸格式的传感器明显小于索尼 LYT 900 的 超级型号但我们仍然发现照片非常吸引人。与 OnePlus 12 相比,它的动态和良好的深度锐度尤其突出。 一加 12.我们还应该提到在日光下拍摄的照片具有漂亮的白平衡和丰富的细节。色彩还原在很大程度上是准确和自然的,我们只在绿色色调方面看到了改进的空间,这一点在我们拍摄的湖泊和草地照片中可以看到。

在弱光条件下,14T Pro 的质量达到了 一流水平但也不过如此。1/1.31 英寸的传感器相当小,导致光线不足,也会造成图像颗粒感。因此,明显的降噪也减少了弱光照片的细节。

35 毫米
35 毫米
75 毫米
75 毫米
75 毫米主肖像
75 毫米主肖像

在变焦和超广角拍摄方面,小米 14T Pro 分别使用了分辨率为 1200 万像素的 50 万像素长焦镜头和 15 万像素镜头。2 倍和 2.6 倍无损变焦下的照片具有一定的细节和令人满意的图像清晰度,最高可达 5 倍。遗憾的是,小米并没有使用自家的 Liquid Lens 设计与浮动镜片组,因此无法使用 14T Pro 拍摄微距照片。超广角摄像头也无法拍摄特写,但照片质量还算不错。不过,仍然存在一些图像伪影,边缘也有一些明显的模糊。与使用主摄像头相比,缺乏 OIS 也会导致更容易模糊。

小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测
小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测
小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测
小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测
小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测

除了拍照,小米还专注于视频录制。14T Pro 可以录制 HDR10+ 格式的视频,支持 LOG 视频格式,还加入了专业视频模式。此外,还有一个新的大师级影院模式(2020 年录制 10 位,HLG),据说能带来更多深度和更细微的灰度层次,尤其是灰度阴影。如果你还拥有一台小米平板电脑,就可以将它用作监控用的外接显示器。

在录制视频时,您可以选择 8K 高分辨率(30 帧/秒)或最高 60 帧/秒的 UHD 画质。在 1080p 下,小米智能手机可达到 960 帧/秒(慢动作)。主摄像头的 4K 视频防抖效果不错,在光线充足的情况下,还原质量也很吸引人。不过,不同镜头的曝光和白平衡有明显差异。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleLow LightUltrawide-angle5x Zoom
orginal image
click to load images

我们还分析了 5000 万像素主摄像头在受控光线条件下与实际参考色彩的色彩还原。14T Pro 在此显示出智能手机典型的增亮现象,以及灰阶的一些偏差,在日常操作中会明显感觉到色彩还原过于明亮。不过,相机软件计算出的整体色彩还原准确度令人满意,ColorChecker Passport 的偏差在很大程度上是可以容忍的。色彩准确度中没有严重的异常值(>15)。

ColorChecker
4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
13 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 14T Pro: 6.85 ∆E min: 3.05 - max: 12.98 ∆E
ColorChecker
22.5 ∆E
31 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
21 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
32.2 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
34 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 14T Pro: 27.53 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 44.19 ∆E

配件和保修 - 小米 14T Pro 不含充电器

120 瓦充电器(小米 13T Pro 测试照片)
120 瓦充电器(小米 13T Pro 测试照片)

这款高档智能手机的包装盒还包括一条 USB-C 数据线(Type C 到 Type C)、一个保护套、一个 SIM 卡工具以及一些信息资料。手机上已经安装了保护膜。相应的 120 瓦充电器不包括在内,但您可以在制造商自己的网上商店选择添加,象征性地收取 0.99 欧元(建议零售价:32 欧元,约合 35 美元)。

在德国,小米为其智能手机提供 24 个月的保修服务。在一些国家,您还可以通过Xiaomi Care 购买意外损坏(建议零售价:74 欧元,约合 80 美元,每年承保 2 起损坏事件)和盗窃(建议零售价:104 欧元,约合 113 美元,每 24 个月承保 1 起盗窃事件)附加保险。(在德国)。

购买 14T Pro 还可享受一些专属服务和合作伙伴优惠。其中包括专属客户服务、12 个月内保修期外一次免费维修(免人工费)以及贵宾休息室龙卡(机场服务提供商)。此外,购买者还可以限时免费使用 Spotify Premium(4 个月)、Google One 云存储(6 个月,100 GB)和 YouTube Premium(3 个月)。

输入设备和操作 - 小米智能手机刷新速度惊人

6.67 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏上的输入可精确到触摸屏的四角。由于采用了高达 480 Hz 的高扫描速率,面板能快速响应触摸输入。得益于高达 144 Hz 的高刷新率,14T Pro 在日常操作中运行流畅,动画看起来也非常流畅。

触觉反馈在日常操作中也很重要,14T Pro 的线性振动电机(X 轴)在打字时提供的精确反馈令人印象深刻。用户可以调节振动的强度。

光学传感器可用于使用手指进行生物识别解锁。在我们的测试中,小米智能手机的显示屏解锁非常可靠,延迟时间保持在一定范围内。此外,还包括一个相当不安全的基于前置摄像头人脸解锁功能的 2D 人脸识别功能。

显示屏 - 小米 14T Pro OLED 显示屏,144 赫兹?

OLED 显示屏采用 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,由一个红光和一个蓝光组成,每个红光和蓝光交替使用一个绿光二极管
OLED 显示屏采用 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,由一个红光和一个蓝光组成,每个红光和蓝光交替使用一个绿光二极管

根据规格表,14T Pro 的 AMOLED 显示屏采用 144 Hz,但没有 LTPO 技术。因此,系统无法动态调整刷新率。那些仍然希望节省电池电量的用户可以选择自动模式,在我们的测试中,该模式只会根据显示内容在 60 Hz 和 120 Hz 之间切换。由于屏幕分辨率高达 1220p,446 ppi 的显示内容看起来非常清晰。此外,它还获得了德国莱茵 TÜV 的三重认证(无闪烁、低蓝光比率和 "昼夜节律友好")。

虽然我们在白色背景下的测量结果显示亮度低于 1,000 cd/m²,但在 APL18 图案和显示暗区时的测量结果(这与日常使用更为相关)为 1,598 cd/m²,非常不错。但在播放 4K 视频材料时,14T Pro 的面板会变得非常明亮,我们测得的亮度为 4,407 cd/m²,可以实现一流的 HDR 效果。这款智能手机还支持多种标准(HDR10、HDR10+、Dolby Vision、HLG)。

954
cd/m²
959
cd/m²
984
cd/m²
948
cd/m²
953
cd/m²
986
cd/m²
935
cd/m²
952
cd/m²
978
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 986 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 961 cd/m² Minimum: 2.39 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 953 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Xiaomi 14T Pro
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy S24+
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"
OnePlus 12
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"
Honor 200 Pro
OLED, 2700x1224, 6.8"
Xiaomi 13T Pro
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
-76%
-41%
9%
-33%
Brightness middle
953
1358
42%
1026
8%
1208
27%
1252
31%
Brightness
961
1358
41%
991
3%
1194
24%
1230
28%
Brightness Distribution
95
92
-3%
91
-4%
98
3%
96
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.9
3
-233%
1.19
-32%
0.9
-0%
1.4
-56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.5
4.4
-193%
3.3
-120%
1.4
7%
3.1
-107%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.2
2.5
-108%
2.4
-100%
1.3
-8%
2.3
-92%
Gamma
2.22 99%
1.98 111%
2.24 98%
2.29 96%
2.23 99%
CCT
6580 99%
6656 98%
6920 94%
6413 101%
6590 99%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.5

* ... smaller is better

小米使用 PWM来控制显示屏亮度,这会导致显示屏闪烁。14T Pro 采用了非常高的频率(3840 赫兹),我们的显示测量也证实了这一点。这意味着,即使对敏感的用户来说,任何视觉上明显的亮度变化都会显得不那么刺眼,尽管面板在 120 Hz 时会出现基本的低频闪烁。这可能是用于烧机保护的 BFI 所造成的。使用示波器,我们可以看到整个亮度范围内的振幅保持均匀,尽管在 19% 的亮度下,深度并不是特别平整。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 19.23 %
Secondary Frequency: 3846 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25% 显示屏亮度
25%
50% 显示亮度
50%
75% 显示亮度
75%
最大显示亮度
100%

在不同亮度设置下以固定变焦水平进行的测量系列。 (虽然最小亮度下的振幅看起来很平,但这只是缩放造成的。您可以在信息框中看到最小亮度下振幅的放大版本)。

HyperOS 在显示设置中提供了大量调整选项。您可以从三种色彩配置文件中进行选择,个性化设置 OLED 面板的白平衡,并根据周围的光线条件调整色温。在 14T Pro 的专业配置文件中,我们以 sRGB 色彩空间为目标,实现了最精确的校准。灰度和色彩的 DeltaE 值非常低,与参考值几乎没有明显偏差。

色彩准确度(配置文件:专业、暖色、目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩准确度(配置文件:专业、暖色、目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:专业,暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:专业,暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:专业,暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:专业,暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:专业,暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:专业,暖色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6995 ms rise
↘ 0.666 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7935 ms rise
↘ 0.784 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

小米智能手机在户外给人留下了非常好的印象。即使在阳光充足的环境下,14T Pro 的显示屏依然清晰可读,而且 OLED 显示屏还能抵御反光。

可视角度长时间保持稳定,只有在非常陡峭的角度下面板才会明显变暗。

性能 - 配备联发科 SoC 的小米智能手机

14 系列与 14 系列相比,T 机型没有使用高通公司的 SoC,而是采用了联发科的芯片组。与前代产品一样 Dimensity 9300+与前代产品一样,14T Pro 中运行的 Dimensity 9300+ 是由台积电以 4 纳米工艺制造的,提供 Immortalis G720 MP12和联发科 APU 790 作为 GPU 和 NPU 单元。与 Dimensity 9300在 CPU 内核结构上也没有明显区别。唯一不同的是,Plus 型号中的 Cortex X4 现在的时钟频率略高,达到 3.4 GHz。

根据联发科的说法,"生成式人工智能"(Generative AI)经过了一些重大改进,这在基准测试结果中也很明显。14T Pro 的性能明显优于 一加 12骁龙 8 代 3这里。在 Geekbench 的测试结果中,小米智能手机也能赶上目前采用高通 SoC 的高端智能手机。Dimensity 9300+ 的性能非常强大,尤其是在多核测试中。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2187 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (2167 - 2192, n=3)
2182 Points 0%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2148 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
2066 Points -6%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1821 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=173, last 2 years)
1494 Points -32%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1491 Points -32%
Multi-Core
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (6972 - 7327, n=3)
7131 Points +2%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
6972 Points
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6630 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
6534 Points -6%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4602 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=173, last 2 years)
4189 Points -40%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
3787 Points -46%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1672 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (1598 - 1639, n=3)
1623 Points +2%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1598 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1567 Points -2%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1502 Points -6%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1413 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=175, last 2 years)
1040 Points -35%
Multi-Core
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (6478 - 7077, n=3)
6744 Points +4%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
6478 Points
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6088 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
5871 Points -9%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
4793 Points -26%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4155 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=175, last 2 years)
3474 Points -46%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2088406 Points
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2005881 Points -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (1726681 - 2088406, n=3)
1949404 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1777871 Points -15%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1329696 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)
1307393 Points -37%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
17534 Points +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (16053 - 16743, n=3)
16493 Points +3%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
16053 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
16008 Points 0%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
15690 Points -2%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
13573 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13174 Points -18%
CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1304 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1290 Points +35%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (956 - 1367, n=3)
1222 Points +28%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1112 Points +16%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
956 Points
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
941 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=165, last 2 years)
917 Points -4%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
11976 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (11606 - 11976, n=3)
11768 Points -2%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
10522 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
9467 Points -21%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
8893 Points -26%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8433 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points -46%
System
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (15367 - 16435, n=3)
15846 Points +3%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
15367 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
15253 Points -1%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
14531 Points -5%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
13985 Points -9%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
11299 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points -33%
Memory
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
11357 Points +1%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
11254 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (10000 - 11254, n=3)
10629 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
10178 Points -10%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9598 Points -15%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8722 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points -37%
Graphics
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
58323 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (56004 - 58323, n=3)
57173 Points -2%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
38959 Points -33%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
29006 Points -50%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
26849 Points -54%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
25796 Points -56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points -69%
Web
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2037 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (1938 - 2051, n=3)
2009 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1998 Points -2%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1907 Points -6%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1785 Points -12%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1734 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points -23%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (55033 - 74821, n=3)
68097 Points +24%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
55033 Points
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
44231 Points -20%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
18127 Points -67%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points -68%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13576 Points -75%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
11342 Points -79%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (43121 - 55794, n=3)
51288 Points +19%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
43121 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points -41%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1473 Points -97%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1122 Points -97%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1121 Points -97%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (976 - 1243, n=3)
1148 Points +18%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
976 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4619, n=42, last 2 years)
784 Points -20%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
488 Points -50%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (4189 - 5204, n=3)
4856 Points +16%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
4189 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32432, n=42, last 2 years)
3765 Points -10%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
487 Points -88%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=42, last 2 years)
5410 Points +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (3975 - 4998, n=3)
4647 Points +17%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
3975 Points
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1128 Points -72%

虽然 Immortalis G720 MP12虽然 14T Pro 的性能还达不到 Adreno 750Xclipse 940在 3DMark 测试中,GFXBench 的数值确实不错。特别是在低级别测试(T-Rex、Manhattan)中,14T Pro 的图形处理器以高帧率给人留下了深刻印象。A vivo X100 Pro在 3DMark 中的表现也略胜一筹。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4331 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4235 Points +10%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3866 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3076 Points -20%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3011 Points -22%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4444 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4256 Points +12%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3808 Points
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3067 Points -19%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3056 Points -20%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17681 Points +30%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
13588 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13098 Points -4%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12004 Points -12%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11678 Points -14%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8774 Points +26%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8237 Points +18%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6984 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5177 Points -26%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5098 Points -27%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8765 Points +26%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8017 Points +16%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6932 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5145 Points -26%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5103 Points -26%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1598 Points +7%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
1499 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1065 Points -29%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1667 Points +7%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
1565 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1055 Points -33%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
738 fps
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
539 fps -27%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
504 fps -32%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
455 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
378 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
478 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
310 fps -35%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
299 fps -37%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
294 fps -38%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
270 fps -44%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
269 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
244 fps -9%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
231 fps -14%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
193 fps -28%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
171 fps -36%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
108 fps
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -37%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -44%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -44%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
147 fps +2%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
144 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
139 fps -3%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
103 fps -28%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99 fps -31%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -25%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -34%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -44%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
75 fps
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 fps -23%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps -41%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps -30%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps -34%
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
188 fps +1%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
187 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
176 fps -6%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
136 fps -27%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps -41%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 12
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
34 fps
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
27 fps -21%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20 fps -41%

在浏览器测试中,小米智能手机的性能非常弱。我们无法确定其中的原因,但结果与日常操作中的冲浪速度不符。 Galaxy S24 Ultra.在与 Pixel 9 的直接对比中,小米智能手机的性能似乎也更胜一筹。 Pixel 9.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
215.5 Points +177%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (77.7 - 184, n=3)
146.4 Points +88%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
139.087 Points +79%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
136.736 Points +76%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +60%
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)
77.674 Points
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
59.665 Points -23%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
289 runs/min +109%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
260 runs/min +88%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (138 - 264, n=3)
219 runs/min +59%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
176 runs/min +28%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +4%
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)
138 runs/min
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
65.9 runs/min -52%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
14.9 runs/min +127%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (6.55 - 15.2, n=3)
12.2 runs/min +86%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=66, last 2 years)
11.9 runs/min +82%
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)
6.55 runs/min
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
3.54 runs/min -46%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
212 Points +172%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
176 Points +126%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (78 - 193, n=3)
153.7 Points +97%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +50%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
95 Points +22%
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)
78 Points
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
61 Points -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
68223 Points +166%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
63452 Points +147%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (25646 - 71054, n=3)
54879 Points +114%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +50%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
36482 Points +42%
Honor 200 Pro
28536 Points +11%
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)
25646 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)
2123.5 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * +28%
Honor 200 Pro
1456.4 ms * +31%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
1143.43 ms * +46%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (632 - 2124, n=3)
1132 ms * +47%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
630.8 ms * +70%
OnePlus 12 (Chrome 126)
624.1 ms * +71%

* ... smaller is better

使用的 UFS 4.0 存储空间非常大。尤其是写入率达到了极高的水平。

Xiaomi 14T ProSamsung Galaxy S24+OnePlus 12Honor 200 ProXiaomi 13T ProAverage 1 TB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-46%
-11%
-50%
-9%
-12%
-52%
Sequential Read 256KB
3687.54
2450.9
-34%
3297.57
-11%
1992.32
-46%
3983.36
8%
Sequential Write 256KB
3908.34
1523.87
-61%
3246.21
-17%
1644.98
-58%
3201.74
-18%
3399 ?(2863 - 3908, n=9)
-13%
Random Read 4KB
441.21
387.42
-12%
438.5
-1%
276.23
-37%
434.21
-2%
402 ?(349 - 441, n=9)
-9%
Random Write 4KB
752.87
176.19
-77%
652.8
-13%
321.09
-57%
583.6
-22%
579 ?(431 - 753, n=9)
-23%

游戏 - 小米 14T Pro 适合游戏玩家

虽然 14T Pro 在游戏中并没有带来真正的惊喜,但这款小米智能手机仍然非常适合在要求不高的游戏和图形设置下进行 HFR 游戏。在我们的测试中,使用GameBench 的应用程序,最高帧数可达 120 fps。.

在《PUBG移动射击游戏中,我们在低细节设置下测得了每秒 120 帧的速度,帧数没有明显下降。在中等图形设置(HD 模式)下,帧数可以达到典型的 60 帧/秒,而当我们在测试中增加图形细节(UHD)时,Immortalis G720 MP12 可以达到 60 帧/秒。 Immortalis G720 MP12甚至达到了 40 帧/秒。

我们的第二款游戏是要求苛刻的《源氏冲击》,在最佳图形设置下运行速度非常吸引人,能提供相对稳定的 60 fps。不过,这只是在热量导致节流至 45 fps 之前的情况。不过,我们并没有发现 14T Pro 的外壳会变得非常热。在较低的细节设置下,小米智能手机也能在较长时间内保持 60 帧/秒的速度。

我们的第三款游戏《死亡扳机 2》在短时间游戏后也出现了帧数限制。但这更多是由于软件优化不足造成的,而不是联发科芯片组发热引起的问题。在玩这款恐怖射击游戏时,14T Pro 的温度其实并不高。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
死亡扳机 2
死亡扳机 2
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Xiaomi 14T Pro; Dead Trigger 2: Ø71.3 (60-117)
Xiaomi 14T Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø59.7 (56-63)
Xiaomi 14T Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø56.2 (43-61)
Xiaomi 14T Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø119.2 (102-121)
Xiaomi 14T Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.8 (50-61)
Xiaomi 14T Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø40 (38-41)

排放 - 采用 3D 冷却技术的小米智能手机

温度

14T Pro 是首款采用全新 3D IceLoop 系统的小米智能手机,该系统不仅将气体和液体冷却物质分开,还为 CPU 提供了 3D 隆起。这种通过独立通道进行的热传导确保了在日常操作中较低的表面温度,即使在负载情况下,机箱在我们的 Burnout 基准测试场景中的 43 ºC (109 ºF) 温度下也不会真正发热。

不过,在 3DMark 的 Wild Life 压力测试中,发热仍会导致系统性能下降约 20% 至 40%。我们的游戏测试表明,这也会导致日常运行中的性能下降。

Max. Load
 42.6 °C43 °C41.8 °C 
 42.8 °C42.8 °C41.9 °C 
 42.3 °C42 °C39.9 °C 
Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 42.1 °C
39.7 °C40.8 °C41.4 °C
39.9 °C41.1 °C41.9 °C
37.8 °C40.4 °C42.6 °C
Maximum: 42.6 °C
Average: 40.6 °C
Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.1 % +39%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.2 % +26%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.5 % +18%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.7 % +11%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86.3 % +24%
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
69.6 %
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.5 % -15%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 14T Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
79.3 %
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø21.6 (19.7-28.5)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22.1 (20.9-25.6)
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø17.8 (16.9-22)
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø72 (59.8-101.2)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø76.3 (71.1-86.7)
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57 (48.3-65.1)
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø77.4 (68.6-80.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø83.2 (72.3-89.6)
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.7 (15.2-22.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø21.3 (17.7-29.7)
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.6 (15.1-21.6)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø21.7 (17.5-29.4)
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø17.1 (16.8-19.4)
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø10 (9.2-11.6)

发言人

14T Pro 采用双扬声器系统,配备杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos),可以产生很高的音量。我们测得的最大音量超过 92 分贝。我们的粉噪测量显示出与前代产品相似的频率曲线。虽然中频可以更加均匀,但 T 系列仍然没有低频。但整体音质绝对没问题。

想要将声音输出到外部设备的用户可以使用有线 USB 连接或带有 Auracast 功能的无线蓝牙 5.4,14T Pro 支持多种编解码器选项。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.233.22526.832.23123.634.84022.342.25027.5416320.539.68020.741.710019.341.612515.744.716013.648.920016.250.325015.556.931515.159.640010.9595009.96663012.167.280014.169.3100014.276.8125012.978.5160014.278.3200012.780.5250012.780.9315013.582.9400013.185500013.182630013.479.8800012.778.31000013.475.41250013.465.51600013.164.8SPL25.492.1N0.787.9median 13.4median 75.4Delta1.110.539.435.732.532.120.830.527.325.934.433.824.633.62031.320.129.816.133.517.545.11547.716.358.213.3591460.212.765.813.869.513.671.413.173.613.776.812.874.613.577.213.978.61380.313.482.613.678.213.778.613.478.413.575.113.965.913.360.525.689.70.779.6median 13.6median 73.60.79.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 14T ProXiaomi 13T Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 14T Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 13T Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 配备超级充电器的小米智能手机

耗电量

集成电池的容量为 5,000 毫安时,充电速度可达 120 瓦。尽管充电性能很高,但内置的小米 P2 和小米 G1 芯片应能确保电池的使用寿命。制造商规定,经过 1,600 次充电后,仍有 80% 以上的电量可用。如果低于这个值,电池通常会被认为已经坏掉。如果您没有随手机一起订购 HyperCharge 充电器,您仍然可以使用其他常见的快充协议(QC3+、PD3.0)。在我们的测试中,使用 Powerbank(PD 3.0,100W)为 14T Pro 完全充电大约需要 29 分钟。否则,小米规定的充电时间为 23 分钟(使用 HyperCharge)。如果你特别着急,还可以激活 "加速 "模式,快速为电池充电。此外,还支持无线充电,功率为 50 瓦。

耗电量 联发科 Dimensity 9300+在空闲运行和负载情况下的功耗都很低。不过,闲置时超过 1 瓦的功耗仍有优化的余地。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.32 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.95 / 1.2 / 1.27 Watt
Load midlight 5.95 / 14.02 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi 14T Pro
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24+
4900 mAh
OnePlus 12
5400 mAh
Honor 200 Pro
5200 mAh
Xiaomi 13T Pro
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
16%
-13%
-51%
-18%
-127%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
0.95
0.43
55%
1.3
-37%
1.11
-17%
0.99
-4%
2.45 ?(0.95 - 3.34, n=3)
-158%
Idle Average *
1.2
0.84
30%
0.95
21%
2.67
-123%
1.14
5%
3.59 ?(1.2 - 5, n=3)
-199%
Idle Maximum *
1.27
0.95
25%
1.12
12%
2.75
-117%
1.34
-6%
3.68 ?(1.27 - 5.11, n=3)
-190%
Load Average *
5.95
6.76
-14%
10.55
-77%
8.13
-37%
10.06
-69%
10.7 ?(5.95 - 13.4, n=3)
-80%
Load Maximum *
14.02
16.42
-17%
11.72
16%
8.64
38%
15.94
-14%
15.2 ?(14 - 15.9, n=3)
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.29 (0.962-16.7)
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.62 (1.152-15.3)
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.789 (0.745-1.044)
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.026 (0.956-1.234)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13.6 (12.6-14.7)
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.79 (8.17-11.9)
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.789 (0.745-1.044)
Xiaomi 13T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.026 (0.956-1.234)

电池寿命

14T Pro 的 WLAN 测试时间为 19 小时,在关闭 WLAN 模块的情况下持续循环播放视频的时间为 23 小时,我们的两次实际电池测试都是在调整亮度为 150 cd/m² 的条件下进行的,因此它的电池寿命非常长。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
31h 18min
WiFi Websurfing (Vhrome 129)
18h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
23h 06min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 27min
Xiaomi 14T Pro
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24+
4900 mAh
OnePlus 12
5400 mAh
Honor 200 Pro
5200 mAh
Xiaomi 13T Pro
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-10%
15%
-12%
24%
Reader / Idle
1878
1965
5%
1798
-4%
H.264
1386
1820
31%
1298
-6%
WiFi v1.3
1123
1009
-10%
1237
10%
993
-12%
1099
-2%
Load
207
427
106%

笔记本检查总体评价

小米 14T Pro 是一款功能强大的高级智能手机,在设备和照片质量方面都有所改进。它以不到 800 欧元(约合 867 美元)的价格提供了 120 瓦快速充电和非常明亮的显示屏等高端硬件。

Xiaomi 14T Pro - 10/23/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
56 / 69 → 81%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
92%
Games Performance
37 / 55 → 66%
Application Performance
68 / 85 → 80%
AI Performance
72%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 83%
Camera
82%
Average
70%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
94.8%
Repairability
45%
Software Updates
78.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 53%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测:亮度惊人的价格杀手
Marcus Herbrich, 2024-10-27 (Update: 2024-10-27)