Notebookcheck Logo
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 评测--最大的Android 平板电脑现在依赖联发科技术

新动力

今年，三星主要对其最大的高端平板电脑进行了微调。它的座右铭是更快更长。在这篇评测中，你可以发现Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 为什么仍然是行业标杆，以及我们还缺少哪些功能。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Galaxy Tab Touchscreen Tablet

评语--创新比表面看起来更多

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 很可能是有史以来最好的平板电脑之一，它提供的不仅仅是一块大显示屏--顺便说一句，新的防眩光涂层大大增强了它的显示效果。在我们的测试中，联发科（MediaTek）处理器显示出其强大的性能，因此无需因为更换制造商而做出任何妥协。不过，这款超大平板电脑的效率却不尽如人意，因为其运行时间比上一代产品要短。

此外，三星终于为其 Ultra 平板电脑配备了 Wi-Fi 7，而且所有存储版本都可以选择 5G 调制解调器，但遗憾的是，5G 版本并未在美国上市。虽然你可以选择高达 1 TB 的内部存储空间，但你仍然可以选择使用 microSD 卡来扩展存储空间。

Tab S10 Ultra 又纤薄了几个原子，最重要的是，它变得更轻了--但 700 多克的重量仍让它无法轻如鸿毛。不过，考虑到它的尺寸，这绝对没有问题。另一方面，三星未能为平板电脑的显示屏提供更高的亮度，我们希望看到一个 LTPO 面板，尤其是在电池寿命方面。其低频 PWM 调光功能也同样过时。

另一方面，该设备良好的扬声器、功能强大的 S Pen、IP 认证和长期更新支持都是值得一提的优点。在很多情况下，用户还可以对这款平板电脑进行维修，因为三星提供了价格合理的备件和说明书。

Pros

+ 快速 SoC
+ 平板电脑随附 S Pen
+ 防眩显示屏
+ 良好的扬声器
+ 存储空间可扩展
+ 通过 IP68 认证
+ 支持长时间更新

Cons

- 显示屏最大亮度较低，不带 LTPO
- 运行时间比上一代产品短
- 低频 PWM 调光

价格和供应情况

Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 可通过亚马逊等大多数主要在线零售商购买，目前含键盘保护套的版本售价为 1,469.99 美元。

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Geizhals
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
87.2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Bestpreis 999.99€ stoeppelkamp-warenhandel
2. 1019€ GSMshop.at
3. 1035€ smartphone-communication | eBay.de
718 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash14.60"
2960x1848
239 PPI
AMOLED 2X
2.
89.2%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Apple M4 (10 cores) ⎘
Apple M4 10-core GPU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB
Bestpreis 1399€ galaxus
2. 1408.99€ büroshop24
3. 1408.99€ office discount DE
579 g1 TB NAND Flash13.00"
2752x2064
265 PPI
Tandem OLED
3.
89.6% v7 (old)
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W ⎘
HiSilicon Maleoon 910 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Bestpreis 799€ Huawei Shop
2. 1199€ nullprozentshop.de
3. 1199€ galaxus
580 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash13.20"
2880x1920
262 PPI
OLED
4.
84.8%
Honor MagicPad 2
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Bestpreis 499.99€ Quelle.de
2. 599€ Universal Versand
3. 599€ Universal Versand
555 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.30"
3000x1920
290 PPI
OLED
5.
88.8% v7 (old)
Lenovo Tab Extreme
Lenovo Tab Extreme
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 ⎘
ARM Mali-G710 MP10 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Listenpreis 1299€740 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash14.50"
3000x1876
244 PPI
OLED

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 隶属于 Tab S10 系列，今年该系列首次仅有两款机型。小尺寸的 11 英寸版本没有升级，但仍有 12.4 英寸版本，即 Galaxy Tab S10+.

乍一看，与去年的 Tab S9 Ultra机型相比变化不大，但三星现在选择了联发科芯片组、防眩光显示屏和更轻薄的机身。摄像头也采用了新的传感器。

其价格（MRSP）今年保持不变：

Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 存储 价格
仅 WLAN 12 / 256 GB 1,199.99 美元
仅限 WLAN 12 / 512 GB 1,319.99 美元
仅限 WLAN 16 / 1,024 GB 1,619.99 美元
WLAN + 5G 12 / 256 GB 约 1580 美元
WLAN + 5G 12 / 512 GB 约 1,700 美元
WLAN + 5G 16 / 1,024 GB 约 2,020 美元

规格

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Galaxy Tab S10 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ 8 x 2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720
Graphics adapter
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
14.60 inch 16:10, 2960 x 1848 pixel 239 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, AMOLED 2X, Anti-Reflection, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 226.9 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1.5 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, hall, OTG, Wireless Samsung DeX
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.4 x 326.4 x 208.6
Battery
11200 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.0, 26 mm) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2) + 12 MPix (f/2.2)
Additional features
Speakers: Quad Speaker, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB-C-Cabel, Card-Slot-Tool, S Pen, One UI 6.1, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, LDAC, SSC | GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C), Galileo (E1), QZSS (L1), NavIC (L5), SBAS | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM Widevine L1 | optional 5G | IP68 | USB Copy Test: 301. 91 MB/s (connected to Samsung 980 Pro in an Asus ROG Strix Arion Case (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS (only reading) | max. charging speed: 45 W (wired), fanless, waterproof
Weight
718 g
Price
1339 Euro
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 -Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 超薄铝制外壳

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 有月岩灰（深灰色）和铂银（银色）两种颜色可供选择。它比 Tab S9 Ultra(5.5 毫米），重量减少了 14 克。5G 版本又重了 5 克。

它的一体成型外壳由耐用的铠甲铝制成，显示屏再次受到康宁大猩猩 5 号玻璃的保护。尽管设计纤薄，但这款平板电脑给人留下了坚实的印象--尽管它在扭动时会发出嘎吱嘎吱的声响，而且裂纹也很吓人。所有缝隙都窄而均匀。

Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 通过了 IP68 认证，具有防尘和防水功能（清水，1.5 米以内，30 分钟）。背面有一个磁性接触面，可以为 S Pen 充电和配对。尽管背面有两个突出的摄像头，但三星平板电脑在表面上非常稳定。

(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
Galaxy Tab S10+（上）和 Tab S10 Ultra（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
Galaxy Tab S10+（上）和 Tab S10 Ultra（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）

尺寸比较

❌
327.8 mm 210.8 mm 7.2 mm 740 g326.4 mm 208.6 mm 5.4 mm 718 g289.1 mm 196.1 mm 5.5 mm 580 g281.6 mm 215.5 mm 5.1 mm 579 g274.5 mm 180.5 mm 5.8 mm 555 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - USB 3.2，功率更大

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 并没有太多新功能。它仍然有一个快速 USB 3.2 端口（第一代，最大 5 Gbit/s），也允许有线图像输出，但三星似乎提供了更多的输出功率，因为这款平板电脑现在可以识别我们连接的三星 980 Pro 外置固态硬盘。这在其 前代产品.

除了有线屏幕输出外，你还可以在不使用线缆的情况下进行输出。借助 "第二屏幕 "功能，Tab S10 Ultra 可以作为电脑的附加显示屏使用，但在没有线缆的情况下并不是特别流畅，而且会大大消耗电池电量。

Tab S10 Ultra 下方长边的金属触点也可用于连接选配的键盘盖。

顶部长边：电源、音量、卡槽（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
顶部长边：电源、音量、卡槽
左：扬声器、麦克风、扬声器（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
左：扬声器、麦克风、扬声器
右图：扬声器、USB、扬声器（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
右：扬声器、USB、扬声器
底部长边：键盘连接器（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
底部长边：键盘接口

microSD 读卡器

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 还可以通过使用 microSD 卡来扩展存储空间。使用我们的 Angelbird AV Pro V60 参考卡时，该插槽的传输速率不错，而且还支持 exFAT 文件系统。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Tab Extreme
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (Angelbird V60)
48.6 MB/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
47.48 MB/s
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=59, last 2 years)
34.4 MB/s -28%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø34.5 (24.7-41)
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø40.8 (27.3-49)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø56.3 (30.7-71.6)
Lenovo Tab Extreme Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø70.6 (31.3-81)

软件 - 更灵活的 DeX 和 Tab S10 Ultra 的 7 年更新

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 预装了谷歌Android 14，制造商在其上应用了自己的 One UI 6.1 用户界面。 Galaxy 此外，还配备了人工智能和谷歌的 Circle to Search。人工智能功能包括翻译和转录功能、图像生成和编辑。

DeX 模式为三星平板电脑提供了类似电脑的界面，该模式得到了扩展，现在可以更好地适应个人需求。桌面模式现在只是可选项，例如，当 Tab S10 Ultra 与键盘或屏幕连接时，它可以自动切换到 DeX 模式。

三星将在七年内（直到 2031 年 10 月）为该平板电脑提供更新。

可持续性

在透明度和可修复性方面，许多制造商都可以借鉴三星的做法。该公司通过其网站提供有关其可持续发展的全面信息，包括每件产品的信息。不过，Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 的二氧化碳排放量信息尚未公布，因此我们的评级最初基于Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 的数值。一旦获得 S10 Ultra 的数据，我们将立即更新。当然，如果能在产品发布时直接提供相关信息，并单独列出所有变体，那就更好了。

三星还通过自我维修计划提供备件和维修指导。.不出所料，最昂贵的部件是显示屏，价格约为 360 美元。

该设备的 Armor Aluminum 由回收铝制成；我们无法找到有关 Tab S10 Ultra 使用回收资源的更多信息。Tab S10 Ultra 的外包装完全不含塑料，只有包裹平板电脑边框的塑料薄膜影响了这一正面印象。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 可选配 5G

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 支持三个频段的 Wi-Fi 7，与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 （Wi-Fi 6E）参考路由器配合使用时，传输速率高且稳定。

我们的测试设备是仅支持 Wi-Fi 的版本，但在美国以外的国家/地区，每种存储配置还可选配 5G 调制解调器。三星平板电脑可以使用 nano-SIM 卡或 eSIM 卡。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
990 (min: 496) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
979 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1888 (min: 1860) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1842 (min: 940) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
658 (min: 447) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
607 (min: 509) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1196 (min: 901) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
978 (min: 615) MBit/s ∼53%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
990 (min: 465) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
438 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼44%
Honor MagicPad 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
867 (min: 453) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
937 (min: 892) MBit/s ∼95%
Average Wi-Fi 7
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1011 (min: 556) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
989 (min: 565) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1556 (min: 563) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1554 (min: 892) MBit/s ∼84%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
540 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
522 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1368 (min: 691) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1351 (min: 666) MBit/s ∼73%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1888 (1860-1922)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1196 (901-1327)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1809 (940-1895)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø977 (615-1142)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø974 (496-1009)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø658 (447-820)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø977 (909-991)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø606 (509-661)
GPS 测试：室内
室内
GPS 测试：户外
户外活动

虽然Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 只支持单频 GNSS，但它甚至能在室内快速确定位置，在室外信号强度也很强。

我们将这款大型平板电脑与 Garmin Venu 2智能手表进行了比较。虽然 Tab S10 Ultra 并不能完美追踪路线，但在导航任务中应该不会遇到任何限制。

全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：环湖之旅
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：环湖之旅
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：总结
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：总结

摄像头 -Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 两侧各有两个镜头

使用Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 主摄像头自拍
使用主摄像头自拍
使用Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 的超广角镜头自拍
使用超广角镜头自拍

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 的两侧各有一个双摄像头，除了主传感器外，还包括一个超广角镜头。就质量而言，镜头性能稳定。正面的镜头尤其适合视频通话或会议，额外的镜头意味着几个人可以轻松地坐在平板电脑前面通话。

背面的传感器略有增加（1/1.36"；Tab S9 Ultra：1/1.34"），但效果令人满意，完全可以满足记录或数字化的需要。

双面都能以超高清格式录制视频，但即使分辨率降低，也只能以 30fps 的速度录制。没有光学防抖功能。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain camera5x zoomUltra-wide angleLow-light
ColorChecker
1.9 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
9 ∆E
7 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra: 4.98 ∆E min: 1.88 - max: 9.02 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.9 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
66.6 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
49 ∆E
38 ∆E
77.9 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
94.4 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
53 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra: 47.7 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 94.36 ∆E

附件和保修 - S Pen 包含在交货范围内

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 随附一支 S Pen、一条 USB-C 数据线和一个用于打开卡槽的小工具。三星还提供兼容的电源适配器或配套的保护套。新的 Book Cover Keyboard 也适用于 Tabs S9 Ultra并首次配备了专门的 AI 按钮，可快速访问 AI 功能。

在美国，该平板电脑享有 12 个月的标准保修服务，可通过三星Care+ 延长保修期。保险套餐。该保险可为平板电脑提供一年或两年的意外损坏保护，也可选择每年最多两次的失窃索赔保护。

输入设备和操作 - Tab S10 Ultra 的海绵振动

在我们的测试过程中，三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 的电容式触摸屏没有给我们带来任何批评，其精准度和令人愉悦的顺滑手感给我们留下了深刻印象。当然，三星的手写笔 S Pen 也再次得到了支持，而且现在还通过人工智能间接扩展了其可能性。例如，Galaxy AI 可以根据需要进一步处理笔记应用中的绘图。

光学指纹传感器集成在平板电脑显示屏的右侧短边，在横向模式下很容易触及。但在纵向模式下，你往往需要伸手去摸。另外，也可以通过前置摄像头设置安全性较低的面部识别功能。

值得肯定的是，Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 配备了振动电机。遗憾的是，它似乎是一个 ERM 电机，振动明显，但也有海绵感，而且声音相当大。

显示屏 - 不是更亮，但防眩光

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

与 Tab S9 Ultra 相比，Tab S10 Ultra 的技术规格没有变化。 Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra.它的面板对角线为 14.6 英寸（37.08 厘米），像素密度很高。它的刷新率介于 60 和 120 Hz 之间，但我们希望看到一个 LTPO，它可以在需要时将刷新率降低到至少 10 Hz。

防反射显示玻璃非常出色。它的色彩亮度得到了完全保留，但其内容不知何故显得更加鲜艳。三星承诺的亮度高达 930 尼特，遗憾的是我们在测试中没有达到。在全白显示屏和环境光传感器激活的情况下，我们在面板中央测得的亮度为 605 cd/m²，如果手动调节亮度，则可达到 347 cd/m²。这至少比较小的 Tab S10+（471 / 352 cd/m²）亮一些，但竞争对手的亮度有时要高得多。我们测试的峰值亮度是在 HDR 播放视频时达到的（895 cd/m²），即使在降低白色表面（APL18：871 cd/m²）的情况下，亮度也没有提高。

Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 的 PWM 调光工作频率较低，因此即使是平坦的振幅也不足以避免敏感人群在长时间使用时感到不适。

600
cd/m²		609
cd/m²		608
cd/m²
603
cd/m²		605
cd/m²		604
cd/m²
602
cd/m²		601
cd/m²		599
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 609 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 603.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 605 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.08
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
AMOLED 2X, 2960x1848, 14.6"		Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Tandem OLED, 2752x2064, 13"		Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
OLED, 2880x1920, 13.2"		Honor MagicPad 2
OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED, 2960x1848, 14.6"
Screen
40%
32%
21%
8%
Brightness middle
605
1000
65%
806
33%
645
7%
621
3%
Brightness
603
1010
67%
803
33%
650
8%
620
3%
Brightness Distribution
98
98
0%
93
-5%
94
-4%
98
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.6
1
62%
0.9
65%
1.3
50%
1.9
27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.4
2.5
54%
1.9
65%
2.1
61%
4.6
15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
1.7
-6%
1.6
-0%
1.5
6%
1.6
-0%
Gamma
2.08 106%
2.21 100%
2.24 98%
2.25 98%
2.12 104%
CCT
6405 101%
6661 98%
6699 97%
6658 98%
6602 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 18.29 %
Secondary Frequency: 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

我们使用Vivid 配置文件实现了最准确的色彩表现，该配置文件还控制着更大的 DCI-P3 色彩空间。然而，在这种情况下，饱和度太强，使得在Galaxy 平板电脑上进行专业色彩工作相当困难。

灰度（配置文件：鲜艳，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
灰度（配置文件：鲜艳，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
色彩（配置文件：鲜艳，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
色彩（配置文件：鲜艳，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
色彩空间（配置文件：鲜艳，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
色彩空间（配置文件：鲜艳，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
饱和度（配置文件：鲜艳，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
饱和度（配置文件：鲜艳，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.782 ms rise
↘ 0.767 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.873 ms rise
↘ 2.224 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

只要阳光不是太刺眼，三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 在户外的显示效果还是不错的。它的防眩光玻璃是一个真正的优势，但其最大亮度不足以显示最佳内容。

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 的视角稳定性非常好。在平视角度下，我们没有发现任何色彩变化，只是亮度略有下降。

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 的视角稳定性

性能 - 三星 Tab S10 Ultra 采用联发科技术

内部 Galaxy Tab S3 系列在 Tab S3 系列中，三星首次使用了高通芯片组，这种情况一直持续到去年。Galaxy Tab S10 系列标志着一个新的转折点，它首次使用了联发科的 SoC：Dimensity 9300+。 Dimensity 9300+.

就性能而言，我们没有什么可抱怨的，因为该 SoC 与 骁龙 8 代 3Galaxy从 S24 Ultra人工智能基准测试甚至显示了 Dimensity 的优势。

Geekbench 6.3 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384
3715 Points +69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2192 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (2167 - 2192, n=3)
2182 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
2079 Points -5%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1986 Points -9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
1174 Points -46%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=70, last 2 years)
1111 Points -49%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384
14690 Points +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7327 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (6972 - 7327, n=3)
7131 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5534 Points -24%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5166 Points -29%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
4088 Points -44%
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=70, last 2 years)
3544 Points -52%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1639 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (1598 - 1639, n=3)
1623 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1598 Points -3%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1447 Points -12%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
867 Points -47%
Average of class Tablet
  (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points -57%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7077 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (6478 - 7077, n=3)
6744 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
4989 Points -30%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4460 Points -37%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
3878 Points -45%
Average of class Tablet
  (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2494 Points -65%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384
2716980 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2033124 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (1726681 - 2088406, n=3)
1949404 Points -4%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1432569 Points -30%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2716980, n=37, last 2 years)
781418 Points -62%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
17329 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
16743 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (16053 - 16743, n=3)
16493 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
15983 Points -5%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
10620 Points -37%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9847 Points -41%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
Apple M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 16384
1944 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1367 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1263 Points -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (956 - 1367, n=3)
1222 Points -11%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1155 Points -16%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
834 Points -39%
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
773 Points -43%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (11606 - 11976, n=3)
11768 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
11721 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9147 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
8784 Points -25%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
5821 Points -50%
Average of class Tablet
  (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)
4205 Points -64%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
16435 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (15367 - 16435, n=3)
15846 Points -4%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13141 Points -20%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
10428 Points -37%
Average of class Tablet
  (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)
7265 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1374 Points -92%
Memory
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
10977 Points +10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (10000 - 11254, n=3)
10629 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
10000 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
8738 Points -13%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
8069 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet
  (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)
4862 Points -51%
Graphics
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (56004 - 58323, n=3)
57173 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
56004 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
31738 Points -43%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
25642 Points -54%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
10876 Points -81%
Average of class Tablet
  (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)
9168 Points -84%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2051 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (1938 - 2051, n=3)
2009 Points -2%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1893 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1584 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)
1269 Points -38%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
1255 Points -39%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
74437 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (55033 - 74821, n=3)
68097 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
15986 Points -79%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13900 Points -81%
Average of class Tablet
  (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)
11323 Points -85%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
10874 Points -85%
AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
55794 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (43121 - 55794, n=3)
51288 Points -8%
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)
7290 Points -87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1273 Points -98%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1231 Points -98%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 12288
747 Points -99%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1243 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (976 - 1243, n=3)
1148 Points -8%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1065 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet
  (243 - 1243, n=8, last 2 years)
705 Points -43%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
5204 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (4189 - 5204, n=3)
4856 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet
  (227 - 5204, n=8, last 2 years)
1683 Points -68%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
981 Points -81%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
4968 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (3975 - 4998, n=3)
4647 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet
  (508 - 4998, n=8, last 2 years)
2014 Points -59%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1693 Points -66%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
3377 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  ()
3377 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (101 - 3377, n=4, last 2 years)
1014 Points -70%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
120 Points -96%
Score V6
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7341 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (7302 - 7341, n=2)
7322 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (390 - 7341, n=2, last 2 years)
3866 Points -47%

撠 ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12集成在 SoC 中，负责三星平板电脑的图形计算，在基准测试中取得了非常好的成绩--尤其是该 GPU 比 Adreno 750还要强大。 OnePlus Pad 2.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
8889 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5527 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3489 Points -37%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3218 Points -42%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1030 Points -81%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
8689 Points +62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5356 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3563 Points -33%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3301 Points -38%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1051 Points -80%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
32525 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18628 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14789 Points -21%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12985 Points -30%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3785 Points -80%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
14922 Points +78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8402 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5468 Points -35%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
15576 Points +83%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8498 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5458 Points -36%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
3737 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1917 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1071 Points -44%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
3583 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1920 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1090 Points -43%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
120 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
809 fps
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
758.2 fps -6%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
520 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
421 fps -48%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
270 fps -67%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps -12%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -56%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
530 fps +104%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
265 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
260 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
226 fps -13%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
106.2 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps -34%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -49%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -71%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
399.5 fps +73%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
231 fps
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
200 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
169 fps -27%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -56%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
84.1 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48 fps -37%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -45%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17 fps -78%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
283.9 fps +86%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
112 fps -27%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
110 fps -28%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -73%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
60 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39 fps -40%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -46%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps -78%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
114.5 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49 fps -45%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps -76%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
99.8 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps -43%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -43%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -75%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
339.7 fps +63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
209 fps
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -43%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -72%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
55.1 fps +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
43 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -44%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps -44%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8.8 fps -80%

Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 在我们的测试中提供了良好的浏览器性能，但显然被 iPad Pro 击败了。 iPad Pro再次逊色。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
333.7 Points +81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)
192.313 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
183.971 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (77.7 - 184, n=3)
146.4 Points -20%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
134.356 Points -27%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)
111.2 Points -40%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
91.258 Points -50%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
572 runs/min +117%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
264 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (138 - 264, n=3)
219 runs/min -17%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
197 runs/min -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)
191 runs/min -28%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)
121.9 runs/min -54%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
67.9 runs/min -74%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
32 runs/min +116%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
14.8 runs/min
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=26, last 2 years)
13.1 runs/min -11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (6.55 - 15.2, n=3)
12.2 runs/min -18%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
11.9 runs/min -20%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
315 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
193 Points
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
155 Points -20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (78 - 193, n=3)
153.7 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)
151 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)
106.9 Points -45%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
99 Points -49%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
105178 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
71054 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)
62837 Points -12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (25646 - 71054, n=3)
54879 Points -23%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
42032 Points -41%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
33982 Points -52%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)
29371 Points -59%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)
3734 ms * -490%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (Edge 120)
1202.4 ms * -90%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (632 - 2124, n=3)
1132 ms * -79%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
842.2 ms * -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116)
634.3 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)
632.4 ms *
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 (Safari Mobile 17)
318.8 ms * +50%

* ... smaller is better

三星平板电脑的现代 UFS 4.0 存储系统几乎在所有方面都得到了改进，只有在读取小数据块时，前代 UFS 4.0 存储系统才会出现问题。 前代型号更快。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraHuawei MatePad Pro 13.2Honor MagicPad 2Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 UltraAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-20%
-30%
-22%
-7%
-65%
Sequential Read 256KB
3912.45
2022.97
-48%
2025.54
-48%
3367.33
-14%
3608 ?(3249 - 4384, n=26)
-8%
1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years)
-73%
Sequential Write 256KB
2963.58
1875.6
-37%
2003.53
-32%
1891.49
-36%
2530 ?(555 - 3348, n=26)
-15%
686 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years)
-77%
Random Read 4KB
342.97
386.3
13%
298.27
-13%
449.37
31%
406 ?(218 - 483, n=26)
18%
189.4 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years)
-45%
Random Write 4KB
554.76
502.59
-9%
401.95
-28%
174.32
-69%
421 ?(152.9 - 730, n=26)
-24%
189.9 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years)
-66%

游戏 - 三星平板电脑可支持 HFR 游戏

我们使用GameBench 对三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 进行了游戏基准测试。得出的游戏基准测试结果令人印象深刻，尽管显示屏分辨率很高，但您仍可以期待随时流畅地玩游戏。在最低细节级别的《PUBG Mobile》中甚至可以使用 120-Hz 模式。

扬声器提供了良好的音效，而显示屏则提供了出色的游戏概览。不过，平板电脑的一个缺点是相对较重。此外，由于平板电脑体积较大，有时很难触及控制按钮。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.1.0_27118081_27297621: Ø59.9 (57-60)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø59.9 (56-60)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø111.9 (91-120)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.6 (51-60)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.5.0: Ø39.8 (31-41)

排放物--音质绝佳的平板电脑

温度

Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 的表面温度在测试过程中始终保持在安全范围内，即使在持续负载的情况下，其温度也只是偶尔超过 40 摄氏度。

三星这款最大的平板电脑的散热似乎更有效，因为它的温度从未像 Tab S10+的温度，而且事实证明 Ultra 型号的 SoC 更加稳定。虽然在 3DMark 压力测试中出现了节流现象，但它的性能仍然保持在较高水平。

Max. Load
 41.8 °C39.5 °C30.2 °C 
 29.6 °C30.4 °C26.7 °C 
 27.4 °C28.3 °C26.2 °C 
Maximum: 41.8 °C
Average: 31.1 °C
30.3 °C38.4 °C41.4 °C
26.3 °C30.9 °C32.7 °C
26.2 °C28.5 °C28.4 °C
Maximum: 41.4 °C
Average: 31.5 °C
Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark stress tests

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
100 % +38%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.1 % +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.7 % +3%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.6 % +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72.4 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 % +39%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89.3 % +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77.6 % +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.6 %
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
66.5 % -7%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
93.7 % +19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79 %
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
71.3 % -10%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.9 % +19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80.7 %
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash
67.8 % -16%
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø25.5 (23.3-32.6)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø37.5 (34.3-51.6)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18.1 (17.6-19.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.4 (18.2-23.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø79.1 (73.6-101.7)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø60 (60-60)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø64.5 (53.4-72.6)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø60.8 (56.7-76)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12.5 (11.6-14.4)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), 1 TB NAND Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø20.4 (18.9-27.8)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.85 (7.73-8.06)

发言人

尽管这款平板电脑设计纤薄，但三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 上的四个扬声器却能提供非常好的音效，低音并不缺乏，只是高音不够清晰。

此外，还可以通过 USB 端口或蓝牙输出声音。不过，后者并不支持特别广泛的音频编解码器。如果两个输出设备与平板电脑无线配对并录音，则只能使用 SBC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.434.22531.834.23129.929.74030.932.65037.935.96329.7328021.442.210021.345.812520.353.91601763.920015.46525013.366.331512.969.740012.768.550011.37263011.972.480011.974.410001372.5125012.873.2160012.371.3200014.567.9250013.166.4315013.469.540001374.3500013.476630013.968.5800013.672.51000013.773.41250013.365.51600012.862.8SPL25.484.2N0.765.7median 13.3median 69.5Delta1.23.533.244.431.841.218.23623.433.332.437.119.429.618.839.817.653.913.862.715.967.5166516.466.615.169.913.871.312.977.113.878.513.576.713.17613.874.312.576.41372.713.271.414.567.713.464.71465.915.270.91569.513.664.41760.115.555.42685.30.767.1median 13.8median 69.514.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 UltraApple iPad Pro 13 2024
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 电池容量大，但运行时间较短

耗电量

在空闲模式下，与采用高通芯片组的前代产品相比，采用联发科芯片组的平板电脑功耗有所增加，而在中等负载下则更加高效。

Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 的充电功率仍可达 45 瓦。由于测试期间没有三星原装电源，我们使用了专为三星设备优化的 Anker Charger 313。使用该充电器，一个完整的充电周期需要 1 小时 43 分钟。37 分钟后超过 50%，61 分钟后超过 80%。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.13 / 0.33 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.34 / 5 / 5.11 Watt
Load midlight 12.77 / 15.94 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
11200 mAh		Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
10209 mAh		Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
5050 mAh		Honor MagicPad 2
10050 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
11200 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
14%
-16%
-4%
6%
21%
25%
Idle Minimum *
3.34
1.94
42%
3.58
-7%
3.6
-8%
3.17
5%
2.45 ?(0.95 - 3.34, n=3)
27%
1.829 ?(0.63 - 6.5, n=67, last 2 years)
45%
Idle Average *
5
5.02
-0%
7.67
-53%
6.52
-30%
3.68
26%
3.59 ?(1.2 - 5, n=3)
28%
3.81 ?(1 - 9.2, n=67, last 2 years)
24%
Idle Maximum *
5.11
5.05
1%
7.77
-52%
6.54
-28%
3.91
23%
3.68 ?(1.27 - 5.11, n=3)
28%
4.35 ?(1.3 - 15.3, n=67, last 2 years)
15%
Load Average *
12.77
8.71
32%
11.86
7%
10.63
17%
15.83
-24%
10.7 ?(5.95 - 13.4, n=3)
16%
9.45 ?(2.5 - 44.9, n=67, last 2 years)
26%
Load Maximum *
15.94
16.93
-6%
11.88
25%
11.57
27%
15.84
1%
15.2 ?(14 - 15.9, n=3)
5%
13.3 ?(3.9 - 54.8, n=67, last 2 years)
17%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø10.8 (4.01-16)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.63 (3.89-15.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.16 (4.12-4.49)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.63 (3.57-3.74)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø15.9 (15.9-15.9)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 (10 cores); 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø16.8 (15.8-16.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.16 (4.12-4.49)
Apple iPad Pro 13 2024 Apple M4 (10 cores); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.68 (2.58-2.79)

运行时间

由于功耗较高，三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 的 11,200 毫安时电池耗电较快，这可能是联发科芯片组的功劳。不过，也有可能是三星公司需要对此进行优化。

它的运行时间还算稳定，但比竞争对手和前代产品要差一些。它的电池耗电相对较快，尤其是在使用互联网时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
15h 35min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 130)
9h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 01min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 27min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
11200 mAh		Apple iPad Pro 13 2024
10209 mAh		Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2
5050 mAh		Honor MagicPad 2
10050 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
11200 mAh
Battery Runtime
61%
11%
24%
25%
Reader / Idle
935
1814
94%
1469
57%
1043
12%
H.264
721
1174
63%
880
22%
704
-2%
WiFi v1.3
585
752
29%
647
11%
606
4%
623
6%
Load
207
326
57%
232
12%
376
82%

Notebookcheck 总评分

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 不仅是 2024 年最大的平板电脑，也是市场上最好的Android 平板电脑。然而，三星只是勉为其难地拧紧了创新的螺丝。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra - 11/15/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
89 / 98 → 91%
Keyboard
71 / 80 → 89%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
64 / 69 → 93%
Weight
80 / 40-88 → 83%
Battery
88%
Display
90%
Games Performance
45 / 65 → 69%
Application Performance
73 / 92 → 79%
AI Performance
72%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
90 / 91 → 98%
Camera
65 / 90 → 72%
Average
78%
87%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
78.3%
Materials
50%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
91.5%
Repairability
80%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 75%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 评测--最大的Android 平板电脑现在依赖联发科技术
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-11-19 (Update: 2024-11-19)