联想IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7敞篷车回顾。酷睿i5-1235U做得好
2022年联想IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7继承了 2021年IdeaPad Flex 5 14通过刷新内部和外部硬件,使其具有更快的性能和更简洁的视觉设计。这是一款经济型消费者敞篷车,与联想更昂贵的专业消费者Yoga系列、SMB ThinkBook系列或专业的ThinkPad系列形成对比。
配置范围从第12代酷睿i3-1215U到i5-1235U或i7-1255U CPU,配备8至16GB LPDDR4x内存。所有选项都配有相同的16:10 1200p IPS触摸屏,没有独立显卡。我们审查的单位是中档的Core i5选项,零售价约为700至800美元。
这个领域的竞争者包括其他预算到中档的14英寸转换机,如 戴尔Inspiron 14 7420 2合1, 惠普Pavilion x360 14, 华硕VivoBook Flip 14, 或Acer Spin 3 SP314.
更多联想评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.4 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.4 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
79.2 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS R7 5700U, Vega 8 | 1.6 kg | 20.8 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
89.8 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.25 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
83.7 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.86 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
81.8 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.5 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
79.1 % v7 (old) | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ i5-1135G7, Xe MAX | 1.5 kg | 18.7 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
2021年和2022年型号之间的视觉变化乍一看可能不大,因为它们采用相同的单调灰色,但仔细观察后有几个不同之处。后角现在更圆,底部的通风格栅更大,铰链也被完全重新设计了。后者尤其解决了我们在2021年的机型上提到的薄弱的铰链,使显示屏更牢固,在更多角度下可以更好地保持其位置。
除了上述变化外,底盘硬度与以前差不多。由于其厚度和边缘到边缘的玻璃加固,盖子相当坚硬,但当向其键盘中心施压时,底座更容易翘起,这在其他预算机型上很常见,如惠普Pavilion 或华硕Vivobook。
期待新设计比旧型号更小、更轻的用户可能会感到失望,因为新型号的重量基本相同,而长度更长,但宽度和高度更短。即便如此,该系统仍然比价格较高的 瑜伽9 14.整体尺寸几乎与竞争者戴尔Inspiron 14 7420二合一机型相同。
连接性 - 支持Thunderbolt 4
端口选项与2021年的机型保持一致。这是少数支持Thunderbolt 4的廉价转换机之一,因为一些竞争机型如戴尔Inspiron 14 7420二合一根本不支持Thunderbolt。
请记住,HDMI端口只有1.4a,因此任何60赫兹的外部4K显示器应通过USB-C DP连接。
我们很希望看到在未来的机型上放弃专有的桶状AC适配器端口,转而使用两个USB-C端口。其他大多数笔记本电脑已经过渡到只用USB-C充电,包括前面提到的戴尔。
SD卡阅读器
考虑到这个价位,集成读卡器的传输速度还算不错。将1GB的图片从我们的UHS-II测试卡移动到桌面上大约需要13秒,而在戴尔Inspiron 14 7420二合一上需要36秒,在更昂贵的XPS 15上需要6至8秒。 戴尔XPS 15.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
沟通
配置包括Wi-Fi 5或Wi-Fi 6,没有Wi-Fi 6E选项,可能是为了节省成本。然而,当与我们的华硕AXE11000路由器配对时,无线性能是优秀和稳定的。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
网络摄像头
联想将网络摄像头从去年的100万像素升级到今年的200万像素,使画面更加清晰。红外线和物理快门都是为了支持Windows Hello和保护隐私而存在的。
维护
底部面板只需用一个T5 Torx扳手和一个平边就可以很容易地拆下来,露出主板和它的组件,如下图所示。内存是焊接的,而电池、SSD和WLAN模块都是可拆卸的,就像上一代机型一样。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件之外,盒子里没有任何额外的东西。有源笔是可选的。如果在美国购买,通常有一年的有限保修。
输入设备 - 更大的点击板
键盘
与我们在2021年机型上发现的情况一样,2022年机型上的背光键盘按键提供了比华硕Vivobook Flip 14更清晰的反馈,但与更昂贵的惠普Envy或ThinkPad系列相比,其整体行程较浅。特别是空格键的反馈,对于那些可能习惯于台式机键盘或高端商业中心笔记本电脑的用户来说,可能感觉太弱。如果你过去在IdeaPad笔记本电脑上打过字,那么你就会知道在这里会有什么期待,因为联想多年来没有对他们的键盘进行任何巨大的改变。
触摸板
点击板比2021年的机型更大(12 x 7.5厘米,10.5 x 7厘米),可以实现更大的光标控制和多点触摸输入。不幸的是,在点击板上的点击并没有得到任何改善,因为尽管有尖锐的听觉点击,但反馈相当弱,而且很浅,感觉不令人满意。像拖放或双击这样的简单动作在执行时变得令人沮丧。我们建议尽可能地使用真正的鼠标或触摸屏。
显示 - 有限的颜色
大多数显示属性仍然与2021年的IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05相同,尽管我们较新的模型采用了不同的底层面板。特别是,色彩空间和响应时间仍然很差,或者充其量是平均水平,不幸的是,当涉及到预算的14英寸转换机时,这是正常的情况。鼓励用户升级到联想Yoga、戴尔XPS、惠普Spectre、华硕Zenbook或微星Summit系列,如果更明亮和更深的颜色是优先考虑的。
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 356.8 cd/m²
Contrast: 2549:1 (Black: 0.14 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.19
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS Chi Mei N140HCA-E5B, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US Lenovo LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 BOE NV14N42, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng Chi Mei N140HCA-E5B, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ Chi Mei CMN N140HCA-EAC, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 6% | 120% | -4% | 8% | 5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.6 | 42.32 7% | 99.8 152% | 38.6 -3% | 42.7 8% | 41.6 5% |
sRGB Coverage | 59.6 | 62.7 5% | 100 68% | 56.2 -6% | 63.7 7% | 62.1 4% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41 | 43.87 7% | 98.7 141% | 39.9 -3% | 44.2 8% | 43 5% |
Response Times | -4% | 96% | 17% | 8% | -16% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37.6 ? | 38.4 ? -2% | 1.2 ? 97% | 27.2 ? 28% | 32 ? 15% | 39 ? -4% |
Response Time Black / White * | 22 ? | 23.2 ? -5% | 1.2 ? 95% | 20.8 ? 5% | 22 ? -0% | 28 ? -27% |
PWM Frequency | 347.2 ? | 25000 ? | ||||
Screen | -64% | 9% | -58% | -13% | -39% | |
Brightness middle | 356.8 | 236.7 -34% | 367.3 3% | 269.4 -24% | 269 -25% | 205 -43% |
Brightness | 339 | 221 -35% | 369 9% | 260 -23% | 241 -29% | 186 -45% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 81 -10% | 97 8% | 89 -1% | 82 -9% | 78 -13% |
Black Level * | 0.14 | 0.2 -43% | 0.41 -193% | 0.11 21% | 0.22 -57% | |
Contrast | 2549 | 1184 -54% | 657 -74% | 2445 -4% | 932 -63% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.39 | 7.83 -78% | 5.2 -18% | 6.53 -49% | 5.68 -29% | 5.14 -17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.61 | 23.74 -62% | 8.04 45% | 19.76 -35% | 9.61 34% | 19.57 -34% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.19 | 3.8 -74% | 3.13 -43% | 3.17 -45% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 8.6 -187% | 2.8 7% | 5.4 -80% | 4.95 -65% | 4.1 -37% |
Gamma | 2.24 98% | 1.96 112% | 2.21 100% | 2.05 107% | 2.17 101% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 7085 92% | 5901 110% | 5992 108% | 6007 108% | 6628 98% | 6807 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40.3 | 44.2 | 43.04 | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62.3 | 63.7 | 62.1 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -21% /
-40% | 75% /
55% | -15% /
-36% | 1% /
-5% | -17% /
-27% |
* ... smaller is better
X-Rite色度计的结果显示,尽管色温略微偏冷,但开箱后的显示器校准得不错。自己校准面板会全面改善deltaE值,但由于上述狭窄的色彩空间,深度饱和的颜色仍然不准确。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise | |
↘ 8.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
显示屏比去年的IdeaPad Flex 5 14要亮大约50%,以便在户外有更好的可视性。然而,它仍然不够亮,无法克服眩光或在大多数户外条件下观看时感到舒适。
性能 - 比预期的要快
测试条件
在运行下面的任何基准测试之前,我们通过联想Vantage和Windows分别将我们的设备设置为极限性能模式和性能模式。强烈建议用户熟悉预装的Vantage软件,因为关键的OEM更新、性能特征、保修要求等都可以在这里找到。下面几张Vantage的截图显示了定制的深度。
处理器
ǞǞǞ Vaio FE14和 盖特威超薄14都让我们对表现不佳的 酷睿i5-1235U.然而,令我们惊讶的是,联想IdeaPad Flex 5i 14的相同CPU明显更快,以至于它可以轻松地超越大多数运行在11代酷睿i7 U系列CPU或更早的笔记本电脑。原始多线程性能比Vaio FE14快60-75%,即使考虑到任何性能节流。
尽管如此,性能的可持续性可能会更好。当循环运行CineBench R15 xT时,分数会随着时间的推移下降22%,这比大多数其他U系列动力的笔记本电脑的下降幅度略大。
不幸的是,没有酷睿P系列的CPU可供选择。对于这样的选择,联想希望用户考虑更昂贵的Yoga 9 14系列来代替。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (1783 - 3537, n=8) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (566 - 651, n=8) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (2485 - 9208, n=8) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (1444 - 1698, n=8) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (366 - 662, n=8) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (20166 - 38643, n=8) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (4371 - 5233, n=8) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (5528 - 8571, n=10) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (1426 - 1643, n=10) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (4.99 - 9.43, n=8) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Infinix INBook X2 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (42.4 - 65.5, n=8) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Infinix INBook X2 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 5410-D3D7T | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (0.4986 - 0.603, n=8) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (3078 - 7457, n=8) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (15838 - 37760, n=8) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (978 - 2072, n=8) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (45680 - 62404, n=8) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (3099 - 4644, n=8) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (8046 - 18819, n=8) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (23386 - 67140, n=8) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (329 - 633, n=8) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (1670 - 3928, n=8) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (15933 - 41909, n=8) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS |
系统性能
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4528 - 5543, n=8) | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (9143 - 11273, n=8) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6440 - 7354, n=8) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4220 - 5839, n=8) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (983 - 1644, n=8) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1026 - 1676, n=8) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1032 - 1618, n=8) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (746 - 1867, n=8) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
PCMark 10 Score | 5465 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (24653 - 61921, n=8) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (24441 - 66108, n=8) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (25156 - 75808, n=8) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Average Intel Core i5-1235U (76.3 - 119, n=8) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示了在打开我们的主页的多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题。在60FPS下的4K视频播放也是不完美的,在长达一分钟的测试视频中出现了15个丢帧。联想当然可以减少预装臃肿软件的数量,以限制干扰后台活动。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 支持PCIe4
我们的设备配备了中档的 三星MZAL4512HBLU固态硬盘,这在像我们的IdeaPad Flex这样的预算-中档可转换产品上是合适的。不幸的是,我们的设备上的驱动器会表现出节流,可能是由于热限制。循环运行DiskSpd将显示出优秀的传输率,在测试开始时约为3300MB/s,然后节流到只有1100MB/s,如下图所示。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
图形性能明显快于我们数据库中配备相同的笔记本电脑。 Iris Xe 80 EUsGPU。3DMark分数大约比预期高15%到25%,某些游戏的运行速度比平均水平快30%以上,几乎与许多 Iris Xe 96 EUs笔记本电脑。我们怀疑上述快于平均水平的CPU性能已经缓解了集成GPU的瓶颈,导致整体游戏性能更快。
3DMark 11 Performance | 5885 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20521 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4168 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1471 points | |
Help |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 95.2 | 82.2 | 18 | 8.41 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 71.7 | 47.8 | 26.3 | 12.2 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 109.1 | 84.2 | 47.5 | 44 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 38.5 | 20.9 | 20.9 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 32.1 | 26.1 | 25.5 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 69.7 | 30.9 | 24.3 | 19.7 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 14.3 | 12.3 | 9.8 | 8 |
排放 - 更大、更安静的风扇
系统噪音
在低到中度负荷时,系统几乎总是很安静,这与我们在Yoga 9 14IAP7上观察到的情况类似。 瑜伽9 14IAP7.在游戏时,它可以达到38分贝(A),但这仍然比许多其他超极本更安静,在类似条件下,>40分贝(A)是正常的。大于常规的70毫米内部风扇至少要对较低的风扇噪音上限负部分责任,因为相比之下,大多数超极本的50毫米风扇较小。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 23 dB(A) |
Load |
| 33.5 / 37.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.9 dB(A) |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1235U, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZAL4512HBLU | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-512G | HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ Xe MAX, i5-1135G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -12% | -6% | -6% | -12% | -22% | |
off / environment * | 22.9 | 24.6 -7% | 22.9 -0% | 23.1 -1% | 27 -18% | 29.95 -31% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 24.9 -8% | 23.3 -1% | 24.7 -7% | 27 -17% | 29.95 -30% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 24.9 -8% | 23.5 -2% | 24.7 -7% | 27 -17% | 29.95 -30% |
Idle Maximum * | 23 | 24.9 -8% | 23.5 -2% | 24.7 -7% | 27 -17% | 29.95 -30% |
Load Average * | 33.5 | 41.1 -23% | 33.2 1% | 27.7 17% | 38.3 -14% | 39.84 -19% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38 | 43.5 -14% | 44.9 -18% | 45.1 -19% | 42.3 -11% | |
Load Maximum * | 37.8 | 43.5 -15% | 44.6 -18% | 45.1 -19% | 33.2 12% | 39.84 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
笔记本电脑左半部的表面温度比右半部高,因为CPU和SSD都位于主板的左手边。在运行游戏等高负荷时,顶部和底部的热点可以达到40摄氏度,而笔记本电脑的右侧会保持更低的温度。预计你的左手掌和手指会比右手掌更热,这可能会让你感到有些不舒服。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 Intel Core i5-1235U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -19% | -12% | 4% | 4% | 2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39 | 52.8 -35% | 43.2 -11% | 38.2 2% | 38.9 -0% | 41 -5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 40 | 42.8 -7% | 45.6 -14% | 45.6 -14% | 40.3 -1% | 41.2 -3% |
Idle Upper Side * | 31.2 | 31.8 -2% | 34.6 -11% | 27.4 12% | 31.8 -2% | 29.6 5% |
Idle Bottom * | 33.2 | 43 -30% | 37 -11% | 28.4 14% | 27.4 17% | 30 10% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当运行Prime95对CPU施加压力时,时钟频率和电路板功耗将分别飙升至3.1 GHz和97 C,持续约20秒或直到核心温度达到97 C。时钟频率、电路板功耗和核心温度最终将分别稳定在2.1 GHz、26 W和77 C,而配备相同Core i5-1235U CPU的Vaio FE14为1.0 GHz、15 W和69 C。
运行时的GPU时钟速率和温度 Witcher 3将分别稳定在1097兆赫和64摄氏度,而上述Vaio的频率为848兆赫和67摄氏度。
用电池供电运行会影响CPU性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将分别返回物理和图形分数8548和5266分,而在主电源上则为15604和5287分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 39 |
Prime95压力 | 2.1 | -- | 77 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 1.4 | 798 | 65 |
Witcher 3 应力 | ~1.6 | 1097 | 64 |
发言人
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--要求高的CPU
消耗功率
总体消耗量与大多数运行在第11代英特尔酷睿i5或i7 U系列CPU上的超极本相似,相比之下,搭载酷睿P系列的联想Yoga 9 14IAP7的要求可能会高出60%以上。这里特别值得注意的是,我们的联想比Vaio FE14多消耗了近50%的电力,尽管两者都配备了相同的Core i5-1235U CPU。我们的上述基准测试显示,联想的CPU比Vaio的相同CPU快60%,这与它们的功耗差异是一致的。
在启动Prime95和FurMark压力时,我们能够从小型(约10.5 x 4.4 x 2.9厘米)的65瓦交流适配器中记录到69瓦的临时最大值,正如我们下面的截图所示。
Off / Standby | 0.36 / 0.8 Watt |
Idle | 4.9 / 8.5 / 10.4 Watt |
Load |
42.4 / 68.9 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZAL4512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS R7 5700U, Vega 8, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ i5-1135G7, Xe MAX, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 9% | -45% | 0% | 27% | -48% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.9 | 4 18% | 8 -63% | 5.2 -6% | 4 18% | 8.6 -76% |
Idle Average * | 8.5 | 6.6 22% | 14 -65% | 8.2 4% | 6.7 21% | 9.56 -12% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.4 | 7 33% | 14.4 -38% | 9.9 5% | 8.2 21% | 25.82 -148% |
Load Average * | 42.4 | 42.6 -0% | 59.6 -41% | 44.4 -5% | 29.6 30% | 47 -11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 32.9 | 40.8 -24% | 53.6 -63% | 35 -6% | 29.6 10% | 45.9 -40% |
Load Maximum * | 68.9 | 65.5 5% | 68.1 1% | 62.5 9% | 26.7 61% | 69.48 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
电池容量比价格较高的Yoga 9 14小了约20Wh,但运行时间实际上长了2小时以上。预计实际的无线网络使用时间将超过9小时,这对一个预算型的敞篷车来说是非常好的。
使用附带的交流适配器从空电到满电需要2.5小时,或比大多数其他超极本多出一个小时,即使联想快速充电也是如此。用户也可以通过第三方的USB-C交流适配器进行充电。
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7 i5-1235U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 52.5 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS R7 5700U, Vega 8, 52 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 54 Wh | HP Pavilion x360 14-dy0157ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 43 Wh | Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP470EZ i5-1135G7, Xe MAX, 42 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 7% | -25% | 30% | 12% | -19% | |
Reader / Idle | 1437 | 986 -31% | 954 -34% | 1059 -26% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 542 | 738 36% | 405 -25% | 455 -16% | 427 -21% | 440.9 -19% |
Load | 53 | 62 17% | 127 140% | 97 83% | ||
H.264 | 535 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 价格低廉,速度快
2022年的IdeaPad Flex 5i 14有很多优点,即使对于一个预算级的可转换笔记本电脑。首先,联想重新设计了铰链,使其比去年的型号更坚固,以提高质量感。其次,它是为数不多的支持Thunderbolt 4的廉价敞篷车之一,可兼容更多的扩展坞和桌面设置。最后,与采用相同处理器的其他笔记本电脑相比,酷睿i5-1235U CPU和集成GPU的速度比预期的快得多。性能基本上与 戴尔Inspiron 14 7420二合一配备了更昂贵的酷睿i7-1255U选项。
2022年的联想IdeaPad Flex 5i 14为预算有限的用户提供快速的CPU性能和多功能的二合一外形。不过不要指望用它的显示屏进行任何形式的认真的图片编辑。
IdeaPad Flex 5i 14与更昂贵的替代品如Yoga或Zenbook Flip系列之间仍有一条硬线。最明显的区别是它的显示效果较弱,因为颜色被限制在sRGB的60%,而即使是中档笔记本电脑通常也承诺>90%的覆盖率或更高。如果你做大量的图片或视频编辑或流媒体,那么不幸的是,你将不得不在具有更好显示屏的高端机型上投入更多资金,或者依靠外部显示器。然而,对于大多数小学和办公室的工作量来说,窄色域对日常使用的影响很小。
价格和可用性
2022年的IdeaPad Flex 5i 14还没有通过第三方零售渠道广泛销售。目前,获得一个最简单的方法是直接通过Lenovo.com那里的价格从610美元到820美元不等,取决于配置。
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14IAU7
- 08/25/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo