
联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 G10 评测:创作者笔记本电脑中的 1100 nit OLED 和 AMD Zen 5
1 100 个黑点,售价 1 100 美元
联想推出的 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 是一款紧凑型多媒体笔记本电脑,配备 AMD 快速 Ryzen 7 处理器、120 Hz、2.8K OLED 和高达 1,100 尼特的 HDR 亮度,开箱即已校准。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论 - IdeaPad Pro 5 14 物超所值,令人印象深刻
在我们的评测中,新款联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 G10 给我们留下了深刻的印象,它采用了 AMD 处理器,性能高且稳定,电池续航时间长,当然还有新的 OLED 面板。它比以前更亮,而且图像质量极佳,没有出现我们最近在 Yoga 7 14 2in1 上遇到的光栅效应。 Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10.此外,联想还为更经济实惠的机型提供了 P3 和 sRGB 色彩空间的准确色彩配置文件。最高亮度略低于 1,100 尼特,HDR 功能非常出色。虽然存在 PWM 闪烁,但 1.2 kHz 的高频率应该不会造成任何问题。
联想略微改进了铝制机身,尤其是底座周围,其稳定性比上一代产品有所提升。这主要得益于键盘,它给人的感觉更加坚实,不再那么轻浮。该机有很多端口,但扬声器的性能已大不如前,给人带来的愉悦体验也大打折扣。
随着 Radeon 860M iGPU新款 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 的性能仅略高于旧款 Ryzen 7 8845HS,但仍完全满足日常使用需求。不过,当前的 Radeon 880M 和 890M iGPU 以及 Intel Arc Graphics 140V/140T 在游戏时更具优势。与旧机型一样,两种快速能耗曲线过于接近,我们希望能有更大的范围。由于性能较高,风扇的声音也相对较大,但至少没有温度问题。我们建议 IdeaPad 用户创建一个自定义配置文件(30-35 瓦),以充分利用 AMD 处理器的优势。
总之,新款 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 是一款性价比很高的多媒体笔记本电脑。
Pros
Cons
价格和可用性
在我们进行评测时,联想、亚马逊和百思买均未提供与评测机型规格相当的设备。
联想的 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 是一款紧凑型多媒体笔记本电脑,配备 iGPU,采用 AMD 最新的第十代 Ryzen 7(Zen 5)CPU。它还配备了高分辨率 OLED 面板,我们评测机上安装的是亮度为 1,100 尼特的超亮面板。我们评测的是校园版,配备了 Ryzen AI 7 35032 GB 内存、1 TB 固态硬盘和上述 OLED 面板,售价为 1 123 美元(当前汇率),不含操作系统。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
外壳 - IdeaPad Pro 采用铝质外壳
联想为其 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 采用了银色的铝制机身,只有屏幕边框由略微粗糙的塑料制成。虽然我们在进行扭转测试时能听到底座发出轻微的吱吱声,但总体来说,其制造质量和稳定性都非常不错。底座的稳定性比旧型号的 旧型号、键盘也从中受益。盖子的手感更好,铰链的设置也很合理,即使轻微的晃动也无法避免。最大开启角度约为 160 度。摄像头凸起确实有助于打开盖子,但看起来并不特别吸引人。底部的散热区域略有隆起,但更明显的是后支架较高,明显将机箱抬高了约 4 毫米。总的来说,表面并不特别容易留下指纹。
就尺寸和重量(1.4 千克)而言,IdeaPad 在我们的对比组中处于中间位置。100 瓦 PSU 的重量增加了 386 克。
功能 - USB 4.0 和 Copilot+
IdeaPad Pro 提供两个快速 USB-C 4.0 端口和两个普通 USB-A 端口。这样的选择对于日常使用没有问题,但如果能在右侧增加一个用于充电的 USB-C 端口就更好了。它还是一款 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑,支持 Windows 的高级 AI 功能。
SD 读卡器
当与我们的参考卡一起使用时,左侧的 SD 读卡器可实现 78-90 MB/s 的平均传输速度。插入的卡突出机身约 1.8 厘米。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (ADATA V90) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (ADATA V90) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA |
交流
联发科 Wi-Fi 模块支持 Wi-Fi 7 标准和蓝牙 5.4。在我们使用华硕参考路由器进行的标准化 Wi-Fi 测试中,测试设备实现了非常高且稳定的传输速度,并且在测试过程中没有遇到任何信号质量问题。
Networking | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
网络摄像头
1080p 网络摄像头采用机械快门,虽然拍照效果不是特别好,但也能完成工作。该摄像头支持 Microsoft Studio 特效,并配有红外传感器,可通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。

配件
除了 100 瓦 PSU 外,我们的评测设备还配备了联想 WL310 蓝牙鼠标,该鼠标在商店的售价约为 20 美元。
维护
可持续性
IdeaPad 符合多项环保标准(如 EPEAT Gold、Energy Star),联想声称可抵消 0.5 吨二氧化碳。不过,联想没有提供有关使用可回收材料的信息。包装完全可回收,并提供服务手册。
输入设备 - 1.5 毫米键程
键盘的键程为 1.5 毫米,加上精准的按键,用户可以享受到非常舒适的打字体验,堪比优秀的 Yoga 笔记本电脑。去年的 去年的型号的印象已不复存在。更大的方向键和专用的上下翻页键尤其值得一提。两段式白色照明可通过传感器自动激活。ClickPad 的尺寸为 13.5 x 8 厘米,足够大且触感顺滑,但其机械咔哒声非常响亮,让人感觉有点廉价。
显示屏 - 120 Hz、2.8K OLED 和 FreeSync
IdeaPad Pro 5 14 配备了全新的 2.8K OLED(2880 x 1800 像素,16:10 长宽比,FreeSync Premium Pro),除了更高的 SDR 亮度外,还大幅提升了 HDR 亮度。反射式显示屏的主观画质非常出色,与最近测试的触摸屏版 Yoga 7 14、也没有光栅效应。得益于 120 Hz 的频率,移动非常流畅,响应速度极快,而且 PWM 频率高达 1.2 kHz,用户应该不会遇到任何问题。不过,亮度和色温都无法自动调节。
SDR 亮度约为 480 cd/m²,而 OLED 的黑阶通常为 0,这导致了极高的对比度。在 HDR 模式下,我们测得的最高亮度为 1,075 cd/m²,而在几乎全白的图像中,我们仍然测得 750 cd/m²。这意味着 HDR 效果真正发挥了作用,尤其是在电影中。
|
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 473 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
94.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 MNE007ZA3-5, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA ATNA40CT02-0 (SDC41A0), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Samsung ATNA40YK11-0 (SDC4181), OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 90 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 Lenovo LEN140WUXGA (LEN88AC), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 LEN145WQ+, OLED, 3072x1920, 14.5", 120 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -18% | 1% | 1% | 1% | -17% | -3% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 70.3 -30% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 71 -29% | 98 -2% | 99.9 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.6 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 94.5 | 71.9 -24% | 97.2 3% | 97.6 3% | 97 3% | 72.8 -23% | 88.1 -7% | 98.9 5% |
Response Times | -4456% | -153% | -88% | -155% | -4640% | -39% | -58% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.39 ? | 26.7 ? -6746% | 1.3 ? -233% | 0.8 ? -105% | 1.4 ? -259% | 26.3 ? -6644% | 0.44 ? -13% | 0.61 ? -56% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.49 ? | 11.1 ? -2165% | 1.2 ? -145% | 0.8 ? -63% | 1.2 ? -145% | 13.4 ? -2635% | 0.61 ? -24% | 0.67 ? -37% |
PWM Frequency | 1200 ? | 240 ? -80% | 60 ? -95% | 480 ? -60% | 240 ? -80% | 240 ? -80% | ||
Screen | -11% | -10% | -50% | -17% | 1% | 4% | -37% | |
Brightness middle | 473 | 516 9% | 385 -19% | 500 6% | 391 -17% | 421 -11% | 400 -15% | 411 -13% |
Brightness | 474 | 518 9% | 382 -19% | 499 5% | 386 -19% | 412 -13% | 403 -15% | 414 -13% |
Brightness Distribution | 99 | 95 -4% | 95 -4% | 97 -2% | 95 -4% | 90 -9% | 97 -2% | 99 0% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.32 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.7 -42% | 1.99 -66% | 3.55 -196% | 1.89 -58% | 1.3 -8% | 1 17% | 2.8 -133% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.8 | 3.2 16% | 3.69 3% | 6.38 -68% | 4.43 -17% | 2.4 37% | 2.8 26% | 5.5 -45% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 2.3 -53% | 0.8 47% | 2.2 -47% | 1.3 13% | 1.4 7% | 1.3 13% | 1.8 -20% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.25 98% | 2.204 100% | 1.94 113% | 2.204 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.23 99% | 2.21 100% |
CCT | 6214 105% | 6942 94% | 6474 100% | 6405 101% | 6411 101% | 6446 101% | 6586 99% | 6319 103% |
Contrast | 1395 | 12833 | 50000 | 19550 | 1316 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 1.79 | 2.55 | 1.79 | 1.1 | 2.2 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1495% /
-821% | -54% /
-43% | -46% /
-47% | -57% /
-47% | -1552% /
-848% | -13% /
-9% | -31% /
-33% |
* ... smaller is better
通过使用专业的 CalMAN 软件测量面板,IdeaPad Pro 给我们带来了惊喜。与两款更昂贵的 Yoga 2 合 1 不同,它提供 P3 和 sRGB 色彩配置文件。标准配置文件显示的色彩略微过饱和(与华硕 OLED 的默认设置类似),但 P3 和 sRGB 配置文件开箱即显示出非常轻微的偏差。这两种色彩空间也完全覆盖,因此 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 的面板也非常适合编辑图像和视频。通过校准,我们只能改善灰度,但色彩偏差有所增大。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.27 ms rise | |
↘ 0.22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.22 ms rise | |
↘ 0.17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1200 Hz Amplitude: 22 % | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1200 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8516 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - AMD Zen 5 和高达 32GB 的内存
在中国大陆,联想提供的 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 配备了 Ryzen AI 5 340或 Ryzen AI 7 350搭配 24 或 32 GB 内存(LPDDR5x 8000),但不能扩展。不提供专用显卡。
测试条件
IdeaPad 提供我们熟悉的 "电池节能模式"、"自适应电源模式(自动) "和 " 性能模式",这些模式也与 Windows 设置相关联。与前代产品一样,两个速度更快的配置文件彼此非常接近。 前代我们希望它们能相距更远一些。
能源概况 | TDP | CB 2024 Multi | Time Spy 图形 | 最大风扇容量 |
---|---|---|---|---|
电池保护模式 | 27/20 瓦 | 683 分 | 2,628 分 | 32.3 分贝(A) |
自适应节能模式(自动) | 60/54 瓦 | 944 分 | 2,973 分 | 46.5 分贝(A) |
性能 | 65 瓦 | 977 点 | 2,983 Punkte | 48.9 dB(A) |
我们在性能模式下进行了基准测试和测量。不过,对于简单的任务,省电模式已经足够,而且可以通过 Fn+Q 组合键轻松切换模式。对于交流电操作,Vantage 软件还提供了高性能模式,但在我们的测试中,该模式并没有带来进一步的性能提升。
处理器 - Ryzen AI 7 350
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350共使用 8 个内核,包括两个集群的超线程技术。除了四个主频高达 5 GHz 的普通 Zen 5 内核外,还有四个主频更低(最高 3.5 GHz)、缓存更少的高效 Zen 5c 内核。在 IdeaPad Pro 中,处理器的功耗为 65 瓦,因此即使在持续负载的情况下,性能也能保持完全稳定。在所有基准测试中,该处理器的性能与 Ryzen AI 9 365的性能不相上下。与采用 Ryzen 7 8845HS 处理器的旧款 IdeaPad Pro 相比,性能提高了约 10%。 Ryzen 7 8845HS不过,它不得不承认输给了红米笔记本 Pro 14 的 酷睿至尊 7 255H.即使在电池模式下,性能也完全稳定。更多 CPU 基准测试请参见 技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (14383 - 17899, n=3) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1943 - 2006, n=3) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2165, n=76, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (5483 - 6990, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (761 - 784, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 826, n=71, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (2419 - 2651, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (294 - 305, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 322, n=72, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (183 - 246, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (48124 - 63126, n=2) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11668 - 77867, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (6144 - 6162, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6442, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (10774 - 13988, n=2) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 17489, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (2836 - 2874, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3655, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (9997 - 12227, n=2) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 17218, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1955 - 2127, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (726 - 2350, n=68, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (19.4 - 22.7, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (50.4 - 55.6, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.403 - 1.456, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (0.403 - 0.4098, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (22795 - 27581, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (87919 - 107379, n=2) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=70, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (3764 - 4242, n=2) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 115682, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (67317 - 77400, n=2) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (12671 - 13677, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (46152 - 57717, n=2) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=70, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (56915 - 58016, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1043 - 1117, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (12177 - 14991, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 64588, n=70, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (25283 - 47203, n=2) |
系统性能
不出所料,IdeaPad Pro 5 14 是一款响应速度极快的电脑,基准测试结果良好。在测试过程中,我们没有遇到任何系统稳定性问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (6982 - 7366, n=2) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (10801 - 11189, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9363 - 11331, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (9674 - 10040, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 10623, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (8842 - 9654, n=2) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 12442, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1696 - 2005, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2018, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1624 - 1869, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1887 - 2236, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2396, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1401 - 1784, n=2) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (295 - 328, n=2) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 479, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 348, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (249 - 270, n=2) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (278 - 1104, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (436 - 437, n=2) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7366 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 109035, n=70, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (38001 - 85382, n=2) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (44209 - 63260, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (42604 - 106408, n=2) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (87.7 - 102.5, n=2) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
SK hynix PVC10 内置的 1 TB 版本以极高的传输速度给我们留下了深刻印象。虽然在持续负载情况下会有轻微波动,但在日常使用中并不明显。安装 Windows 系统后,我们仍有 918 GB 的空间可供使用。通过空闲的 M.2 2280 插槽(PCIe 4.0 x4),可以轻松、经济地扩展存储容量。其他固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
Ryzen AI 7 350 配备了 Radeon 860MiGPU(RDNA 3.5、3 GHz、8 CUs),这意味着它是继 760M.在日常情况下,GPU 性能非常出色。不过,就纯粹的性能而言,860M 不得不承认输给了 Radeon 880M以及 Arc Graphics 140T.旧的 Radeon 780M以及 Lunar Lake 处理器中的 Arc Graphics 130V 均被击败。这种情况在游戏测试中也得到了证实。 赛博朋克 2077或 博德之门 3等高要求的游戏只能在 1080p 下以低图形细节流畅运行。无论是在电池供电还是连续负载的情况下,图形处理器的性能都保持完全稳定。更多 GPU 基准测试可在 技术部分.
3DMark 11 Performance | 12267 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7241 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3342 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 490 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2582 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 2570 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Radeon 860M (283 - 381, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8.48 - 31.4, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 172.5 | 160.5 | 74.7 | 28 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 166.4 | 137.9 | 83.4 | 78.1 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 85.6 | 41.5 | 28.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 77.2 | 59.7 | 47.7 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 104 | 47 | 43 | 40 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 171.3 | 68.2 | 55.7 | 45.5 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 36.9 | 29.9 | 23.5 | 23.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 40.4 | 31 | 24.3 | 19.9 |
F1 24 (2024) | 77.2 | 69.6 | 51.8 | 10.6 |
排放 - 风扇声音大,机箱温度低
噪音排放
在轻负载情况下,通常会关闭两个风扇。对于日常工作,我们建议使用省电模式,因为即使在重负载情况下,风扇的最大噪音也能达到 32 分贝(A)左右。不过,在其他两个模式下,噪音会非常大,分别为 46.5 和 48.9 dB(A),甚至比旧型号还要大。 旧型号.因此,我们建议在游戏时使用耳机。评测设备没有发出其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.6 / 23.6 / 23.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 46.5 / 48.9 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Radeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Arc 140T, Ultra 7 255H, YMTC PC411-1TB | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2550 512GB | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 Radeon 740M, R5 7540U, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2550 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TGE | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 7% | 8% | 0% | 3% | 6% | 5% | 2% | |
off / environment * | 23.6 | 23.8 -1% | 24.2 -3% | 25 -6% | 24 -2% | 24.7 -5% | 23.8 -1% | 23.9 -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.6 | 23.8 -1% | 24.2 -3% | 25 -6% | 25 -6% | 24.7 -5% | 23.8 -1% | 23.9 -1% |
Idle Average * | 23.6 | 23.8 -1% | 24.2 -3% | 26 -10% | 27 -14% | 24.7 -5% | 23.8 -1% | 23.9 -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.6 | 23.8 -1% | 24.2 -3% | 29 -23% | 29 -23% | 26.3 -11% | 23.8 -1% | 23.9 -1% |
Load Average * | 46.5 | 30 35% | 28.8 38% | 40 14% | 37 20% | 37.6 19% | 44.6 4% | 44.3 5% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 48.9 | 42.2 14% | 37.6 23% | 40 18% | 37 24% | 37.6 23% | 35.9 27% | |
Load Maximum * | 48.9 | 45.3 7% | 45.6 7% | 41 16% | 38 22% | 37.6 23% | 44.6 9% | 44.3 9% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.3 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.3 °C / 82.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-0.1 °C / -0.1 F).
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 AMD Ryzen 5 7540U, AMD Radeon 740M | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -8% | -2% | -4% | -6% | -8% | -5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42.2 | 41.9 1% | 38.4 9% | 41 3% | 39 8% | 41.7 1% | 42 -0% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42.4 | 52.1 -23% | 49.7 -17% | 45 -6% | 46 -8% | 50.1 -18% | 40.6 4% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25.4 | 26.3 -4% | 25.1 1% | 26 -2% | 28 -10% | 27.1 -7% | 28.2 -11% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.7 | 27.4 -7% | 25.8 -0% | 28 -9% | 29 -13% | 27.7 -8% | 28.9 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个立体声扬声器无疑是 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 的软肋。除了最大音量有限外,声音也非常单薄。无论是音乐还是视频,都不太令人愉悦。这是 前代产品做得要好得多。
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 电池寿命长
耗电量
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T, YMTC PC411-1TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, Micron 2550 512GB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 R5 7540U, Radeon 740M, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, Micron 2550 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TGE, OLED, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Average AMD Radeon 860M | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -4% | 34% | 24% | 18% | 5% | 3% | 1% | 1% | 10% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.1 | 5.2 -2% | 2.7 47% | 5 2% | 5 2% | 4.6 10% | 5.5 -8% | 5.3 -4% | 4.9 ? 4% | 4.3 ? 16% |
Idle Average * | 6.8 | 9.3 -37% | 6.7 1% | 6 12% | 6 12% | 7.8 -15% | 7.6 -12% | 7.2 -6% | 7.5 ? -10% | 7.33 ? -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.9 | 10.3 -49% | 6.9 -0% | 10 -45% | 10 -45% | 8 -16% | 7.9 -14% | 7.5 -9% | 7.95 ? -15% | 9.07 ? -31% |
Load Average * | 71.7 | 56.5 21% | 34.5 52% | 36 50% | 41 43% | 71.7 -0% | 77.9 -9% | 65.6 9% | 65.4 ? 9% | 45.2 ? 37% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 84.8 | 70 17% | 43 49% | 41.6 51% | 42.5 50% | 71.4 16% | 63 26% | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 83.5 | 65 22% | 41.9 50% | 38.2 54% | 68.5 18% | 61.5 26% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 104.8 | 101.8 3% | 62.7 40% | 60 43% | 58 45% | 83 21% | 94.8 10% | 89.6 15% | 89.4 ? 15% | 69 ? 34% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 73 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 84 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T, 80 Wh | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 75 Wh | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 65 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 R5 7540U, Radeon 740M, 60 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 73 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 16% | 87% | -10% | -29% | 18% | -1% | 28% | 35% | |
H.264 | 1177 | 1199 2% | 929 -21% | 649 -45% | 1031 -12% | 961 ? -18% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 833 | 970 16% | 1030 24% | 753 -10% | 590 -29% | 715 -14% | 527 -37% | 710 -15% | 757 ? -9% |
Load | 52 | 174 235% | 99 90% | 93 79% | 110 112% | 121.3 ? 133% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10
- 04/11/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,182.00 Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 5 A... 2. $699.43 IdeaPad 5 2-in-1-2024 - Prof... 3. $370.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i - (20... List Price: 989€ | 1.4 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Intel Core Ultra 7 255H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $15.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector... 2. $30.95 celicious Impact Anti-Shock ... List Price: 1090€ | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $949.49 ASUS Vivobook S 14 Copilot+ ... 2. $1,159.00 ASUS Vivobook S 14 Copilot+ ... 3. $899.99 ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED Slim... List Price: 1099€ | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1200 EUR | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 AMD Ryzen 5 7540U ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $573.99 List Price: 800 EUR | 1.4 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1200€ | 1.5 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $969.99 Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AHP9-202... 2. $2,049.00 Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16"" Lapt... 3. $15.99 2 Pack Tempered Glass Screen... List Price: 1599€ | 1.5 kg | 18 mm | 14.50" 3072x1920 250 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.