小米红米 K70 Pro 智能手机评测：出色的硬件，中档的价格 [Poco F6 Pro］

Name: Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
Brand: Xiaomi

4061 尼特的价格不到 500 美元，令人印象深刻！

红米 K70 Pro 拥有明亮的 1400p AMOLED 显示屏、WiFi 7、最高 24GB RAM 的骁龙 8 代 3 和带 OIS 的相机系统，它不仅仅是旗舰杀手中的内幕消息。小米的这款中端手机有什么弱点吗？让我们一探究竟。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 04/17/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Touchscreen Smartphone

如果说哪款智能手机配得上 "旗舰杀手 "的称号，那肯定是红米 K70 Pro。红米 K70 Pro 拥有高达 24GB 的 RAM、最先进的最佳芯片组Android 智能手机中目前最好的芯片组以及超过 4000 nits 的亮度，这款小米智能手机为 2024 年的中端手机设定了标准，至少在数据表上是这样。

不过，红米 K70 Pro 目前只有进口版本，包括来自深圳贸易公司的 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 闪存，售价约为 485 美元。配备 24 GB 内存和 1 TB 闪存的顶级机型价格约为 730 美元。如果传言属实，那么这款小米智能手机也将在全球发布，只是品牌不同，即 Poco F6 Pro。

为了实现这些极具侵略性的低价，小米在相机中安装了坚实但非高端的硬件。不过，购买者仍将受益于光学防抖和 5000 万像素主摄像头的 8K 视频选项。

Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro (Redmi K70 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 750

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

6.67 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 526 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 224 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, color spectrum, OTG, Miracast, IR Blaster

Networking

Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 5G: n1/n3/n5/n8/n28a/n38/n41/n48/n66/n77/n78; 4G: B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28a/B64, B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48; 3G: B1/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19; 2G: B3/B5/B8), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.21 x 160.86 x 74.95

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.6, OIS, 1/1,55 inch, Light Hunter 800) + 50 MPix (f/1.9, tele, 2x optical) + 12 MPix (f/2.2, ultrawide), camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (F/2.4, 1080p@60fps)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, charger, USB cable, case, info material, Hyper OS 1.0, 12 Months Warranty, GNSS: Beidou: B1I + B1C+B2a｜GPS: L1+L5｜Galileo: E1+E5aGLONASS: G1｜QZSS: L1+L5, SBAS, fanless

Weight

209 g, Power Supply: 191 g

Price

460 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
87.2 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2024	Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750	209 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.67"	3200x1440
84.9 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Realme GT5 SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	205 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.74"	2772x1240
86.1 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2024	Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6	186 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.67"	2712x1220
87.4 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2024	Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530	213 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.60"	2340x1080
87.4 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2024	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4	204.5 g	512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.67"	2712x1220
86.8 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2024	Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750	229 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.80"	2480x1116

外壳 - 无 IP 等级

红米 K70 有两种设计。标准版设计显得朴素而不显眼，而两款兰博基尼版则非常与众不同。总共有五种颜色可供选择。为了降低成本，K70 省去了 IP 认证，但 SIM 卡插槽有一个红色密封环。

6.67 英寸 AMOLED 面板四周的边缘并不对称，但却很薄，这使得屏占比高达 89%。由于小米决定不在14 Pro 上使用康宁的保护玻璃，而是选择了自家的材料方案，因此我们推测 K70 Pro 也不会使用大猩猩玻璃，目前官方还没有这方面的信息。

作为一款中端智能手机，K70 Pro 的做工和手感都非常出色，内置按键稳固地固定在铝制边框上，非常舒适。按键间隙也很平齐，无可挑剔。唯一的缺点是背面采用了塑料材质，但由于采用了磨砂表面处理，因此不会留下油腻的指痕，也不会给人廉价的感觉。

尺寸比较

Realme GT5 Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G DIN A6 ❌

设备 - 机载红外喷射器

红米 K70 Pro 配备了蓝牙 5.4、双卡双待、立体声扬声器、红外爆破器和用于非接触式支付的 NFC，在中端机型中功能非常全面。不出所料，USB-C 端口仅为 2.0 标准，这意味着这里无法进行有线图像输出。在我们使用 M2.SSD 硬盘（三星 980 Pro）进行的拷贝测试中，USB 端口的传输速度仅为 30 MB/s。连接的存储介质可以用 FAT、FAT32 或 exFAT 格式化。小米还支持 NTFS 硬盘的读写。

我们的测试设备拥有 256 GB 的 UFS 4.0 存储空间，但由于操作系统和一些预装应用程序的原因，实际可用存储空间较小（约 227 GB）。如果你需要更多空间，可以通过 USB-OTG 将文件传输到外部存储介质，如记忆棒。无法使用 microSD 卡扩展存储空间。

K70 Pro 不支持有线图像输出，但可以通过 Miracast 将显示内容无线传输到外部显示器。由于采用了 Widevine L1，因此可以高清质量观看流媒体服务中的视频内容。

软件 - HyperOS

红米 K70 Pro 采用的是小米 HyperOS 内核，它融合了 Linux 和自主开发的 Vela 系统。在评测时，HyperOS 界面基于最新的Android 14，包括 2024 年 2 月起的安全补丁。小米计划在五年内为 K70 Pro 提供与安全相关的更新，但目前还不确定每年推出更新的频率。计划中的Android 升级次数也是如此。不过，过去红米机型的更新供应并不可靠（随着机型的老化，更新间隔越来越长）。

K70 Pro 不支持谷歌应用程序或全面的语言选择 ex works。在这里，用户必须自行安装 apk 文件，如 Playstore，并使用英语作为界面语言。Android Auto 也有限制。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 包括 5G

得益于 WiFi 7，红米 K70 Pro 可以提供极快的传输速度，前提是相应的路由器也要同样快。与我们的华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器连接后，6 GHz 范围内的传输速率也非常高，超过 1800 MBit/s，至少在发送时是这样。不过，高数据传输速率很不稳定，波动很大。

除了高性能的 WiFi 外，K70 Pro 还采用了快速的 5G 标准和稳定的 4G 网络频率范围。不过，在世界各国常用的 17 个 LTE 频段中，缺少了频段 20 和 32。

Networking
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000	816 (min: 730) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	754 (min: 272) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1631 (min: 1024) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	962 (min: 845) MBit/s ∼60%
Realme GT5
iperf3 receive AXE11000	971 (min: 917) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1000 (min: 722) MBit/s ∼56%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000	861 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	812 (min: 583) MBit/s ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000	823 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	735 (min: 671) MBit/s ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000	848 (min: 445) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	881 (min: 669) MBit/s ∼49%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1660 (min: 1500) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1801 (min: 1553) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1716 (min: 829) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1613 (min: 654) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000	711 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	725 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1443 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1387 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼86%

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1631 (1024-1834)

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø960 (845-992)

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø815 (730-932)

Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø967 (917-986)

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø745 (272-897)

Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1000 (722-1023)

红米 K70 Pro 使用主要的卫星系统来确定自己的位置：GPS、伽利略、格洛纳斯和北斗，通常采用双频。我们在一次短途骑行中测试了这款中端智能手机的定位精度，结果非常不错。

为了进行比较，我们与 Garmin Venu 2 同时记录了一条路线。两款设备的测量值之间的偏差一般都很小，但我们更喜欢红米 K70 Pro 的详细跟踪功能，甚至比 Garmin 智能手表更好。但记录的路线往往是一致的。因此，红米智能手机非常适合日常导航任务。

电话和语音质量

红米 K70 Pro 提供两个 nano-SIM 卡插槽的全功能双卡双待功能，但系统中没有集成 eSIM 卡的选项。通话也可以通过 WLAN 进行。

K70 Pro 的两个内置麦克风可提供良好的语音质量，不过会受到轻微背景噪音的影响。噪音抑制效果令人满意。通过耳机的通话质量也是如此。

照相机 - OIS 作为套件的一部分

这款中端智能手机的自拍摄像头可拍摄分辨率为 1600 万像素的照片，并使用固定对焦对准拍摄对象。在明亮的环境中，质量绝对令人满意，但由于没有 4K 视频选项，红米 K70 Pro 并不是摄像专家。

由于支持 8K 录像或 4K60 选项，5,000 万像素的主摄像头更适合录制动态图像，但尽管有 OIS，其防抖功能也没有达到旗舰级水平。

在照片质量方面，Light Hunter 800 图像传感器（Omnivision 的 1/1.55 英寸传感器）提供了令人满意的效果。由于采用了大光圈（f/1.6），照片的动态范围令人信服，光线充足。不过，使用红米 K70 Pro 拍摄的照片经常会出现曝光过度的情况。清晰度也可以再高一些。

这款中档手机还提供无损变焦功能。5000 万像素镜头具有 2 倍光学放大功能，效果相当出色。不过，如果你想更接近拍摄对象，就会很快失去质量，以至于在 5 倍变焦时几乎没有任何细节。

主镜头和长焦镜头还配备了一个 1200 万像素的超广角摄像头。对于这个价位的产品来说，图像的清晰度尚可，但在日光下已经可以看到背景噪点。不过，红米 K70 Pro 相机阵列中的第三颗镜头总能为社交媒体带来令人满意的效果。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angle Wide angle Low light Ultra wide angle 5x zoom

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在受控照明条件下，我们将 Light Hunter 800 的色彩表现与实际参考色彩进行了对比分析。除了智能手机经常出现的典型增亮现象外，红米 K70 Pro 在 ColorChecker 通行证中没有显示任何重大偏差。这款智能手机仅在青色方面出现了色彩异常值（>10）。

配件和保修

黑色包装盒内有一个保护盖、一个 120 瓦充电器（USB-A 转 USB-C）、一个更换 SIM 卡的工具和中文信息宣传单。出厂前还贴有保护膜。此外，Trading Shenzhen 还为我们的中国机型提供了一个额外的欧盟充电器适配器和一个 USB OTG 适配器。

红米 K70 Pro 提供 12 个月保修。

输入设备和操作

电容式触摸屏对手指输入的响应非常精确。OLED 面板的采样率高达 2160 Hz，对触摸高度敏感，但在游戏等特定应用场景中，屏幕每秒仅刷新 2160 次，以确保输入的低延迟。

小米在红米 K70 Pro 中安装了实体 x 轴振动电机，在日常使用中能提供愉悦的触觉反馈。光学指纹传感器集成在 OLED 显示屏中，解锁可靠、快速。此外，还有通过前置摄像头实现的 2D 面部识别功能。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 体面的 AMOLED 面板

OLED 显示屏采用 RGGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和两个绿色 LED 组成。

TCL 内置的 6.67 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏分辨率达到 WQHD+，像素密度高达 522 ppi。在自动模式下，系统为 120 Hz 屏幕输出的最低频率为 60 Hz。此外，刷新率也可以固定为 60 或 120 Hz。

在纯白色显示屏和激活环境光传感器的情况下，最大亮度为 1026 cd/m²；当明暗区域均匀分布时，显示屏会显得更亮（APL18）。然而，红米 K70 Pro 的 1236 cd/m² 显示亮度与我们的预期略有差距。幸运的是，在播放 4K 视频资料时，我们仍然达到了广告宣传的 4000 尼特峰值亮度，即 4061 cd/m²。这使得红米 K70 Pro 非常适合播放 HDR 内容。它支持 HLG、HDR10+ 和 HDR Vivid 以及杜比视界。


1016 cd/m²	1020 cd/m²	1023 cd/m²
1023 cd/m²	1026 cd/m²	1024 cd/m²
1026 cd/m²	1019 cd/m²	1015 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1026 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1021.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1026 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27

	Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"	Realme GT5 AMOLED, 2772x1240, 6.7"	Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"	Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.8"
Screen		-37%	27%	18%	32%	26%
Brightness middle	1026	1080 5%	1034 1%	962 -6%	1240 21%	1035 1%
Brightness	1021	1084 6%	1035 1%	967 -5%	1233 21%	1031 1%
Brightness Distribution	99	92 -7%	96 -3%	99 0%	98 -1%	96 -3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.5	5 -100%	1.1 56%	1.6 36%	1.1 56%	1 60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.9	7.7 -97%	1.9 51%	2.6 33%	2.2 44%	1.9 51%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3	3.9 -30%	1.4 53%	1.5 50%	1.4 53%	1.6 47%
Gamma	2.27 ^97%	2.03 ^108%	2.22 ^99%	2.13 ^103%	2.21 ^100%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6782 ^96%	7001 ^93%	6674 ^97%	6382 ^102%	6669 ^97%	6368 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

由于采用了 OLED 技术，小米使用 PWM 调制来控制屏幕亮度，包括典型的屏幕闪烁。在我们使用示波器进行测量时，整个亮度范围内的振幅曲线非常均匀，并且在 120 Hz 时保持不变。不过，红米 K70 Pro 的一个特点是频率非常高，达到了 3840 Hz，在这个频率下，面板会出现肉眼可见的亮度波动。这应该会使 OLED 显示屏更适合对 PWM 敏感的用户，而不是基本的闪烁现象。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下进行的系列测量

校准设置选项非常丰富。除了三种色彩配置文件外，还有 "高级 "模式可供选择。这样既可以调整色温，也可以调整饱和度或色彩空间等个别参数，同时还可以使用更大的 DCI-P3 色彩空间和另一种校准非常好的色彩模式。

我们使用 Calman 分析软件检查了 AMOLED 面板色彩校准的偏差。在 "原始 "配置文件中，sRGB 色彩空间几乎完全覆盖。个别颜色的差异几乎无法辨别。我们测量的 DeltaE 值表明，在目标范围内（<3），色彩和灰度略有偏差。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.625 ms rise
1.17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5435 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.99 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.488 ms rise
0.99 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5005 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在户外，小米智能手机的高亮度给人留下了深刻印象。面板的亮度储备足以应对初夏的光线环境。不过，反光在一定程度上限制了 AMOLED 面板的可读性。值得注意的是，在没有亮度传感器的情况下，最大亮度仅为 507 cd/m²。

我们非常喜欢其可视角度的稳定性；在非常平的可视角度下，只能看到亮度略有下降。即使屏幕倾斜，色彩也依然鲜艳，不会出现反色现象。

性能 - 现代高通 SoC

红米 K70 Pro 在 SoC 的选择上非常面向未来。Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ，小米安装了迄今为止最好的芯片。在我们的基准测试中，这款配备 16GB DDR5x 内存和快速 256GB UFS 4.0 内存的中端手机表现非常出色。

在 Geekbench 5.5 中，单核 CPU 性能非常强劲，K70 Pro 的表现优于

努比亚红魔 9 Pro的骁龙 8 代 3，尤其是在多核基准测试中。不过，小米智能手机在 6.2 版本中意外地落后了，但仍然超过了 Realme GT5的去年的 SoC在多核方面，这在意料之中，因为它采用了高频 Cortex A720 内核。除此之外，在中端手机中找不到可与之媲美的产品，即使是联发科 Dimensity 8300 Ultra在测试中的表现也明显不如 K70 Pro 的高通芯片组。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	2270 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	2129 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (954 - 2329, n=21)	2106 Points -1%
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	2021 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 3479, n=175, last 2 years)	1500 Points -30%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1424 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	1157 Points -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	1147 Points -46%
Multi-Core
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	7151 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4564 - 7501, n=21)	6638 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	6432 Points
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	5587 Points -13%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	4547 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 10401, n=175, last 2 years)	4205 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	3456 Points -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	2715 Points -58%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	1676 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1343 - 1702, n=14)	1652 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	1575 Points -6%
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1521 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1085 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=177, last 2 years)	1045 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	891 Points -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	887 Points -47%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (5393 - 6543, n=14)	6058 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	5871 Points
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	5393 Points -8%
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	4654 Points -21%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	4279 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=177, last 2 years)	3488 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	3349 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	2521 Points -57%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	2157865 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1390723 - 2162423, n=17)	1934946 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	1859657 Points
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1607558 Points -14%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1465265 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=108, last 2 years)	1311330 Points -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	767738 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	740935 Points -60%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	20943 Points +36%
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	19748 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (12156 - 21628, n=20)	17861 Points +16%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	15343 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	14716 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	13393 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 27169, n=199, last 2 years)	13195 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	12313 Points -20%

CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (983 - 1474, n=13)	1238 Points +19%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	1043 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	987 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=167, last 2 years)	925 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	784 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	686 Points -34%
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	Points -100%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	Points -100%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	10897 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (8148 - 10966, n=16)	9947 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	8674 Points
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	7354 Points -15%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	7122 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=161, last 2 years)	6467 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	5192 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	4964 Points -43%
System
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	15935 Points +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (8611 - 16015, n=16)	13995 Points +26%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	12177 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	11778 Points +6%
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	11352 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	11073 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=161, last 2 years)	10321 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	9366 Points -15%
Memory
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	11460 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (7426 - 12716, n=16)	10611 Points +19%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	8937 Points
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	7836 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	7784 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=161, last 2 years)	7017 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	5847 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	4109 Points -54%
Graphics
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	36002 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (26972 - 39727, n=16)	34142 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	29938 Points
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	29834 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=161, last 2 years)	17962 Points -40%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	16594 Points -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	10386 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	8511 Points -72%
Web
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	2145 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (1661 - 2145, n=16)	1962 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	1893 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1636 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=161, last 2 years)	1572 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	1474 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	1278 Points -32%
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1192 Points -37%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	64597 Points +366%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	28870 Points +108%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	18048 Points +30%
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=152, last 2 years)	17753 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (11487 - 18370, n=15)	16446 Points +19%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	13873 Points
Realme GT5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	12656 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	5205 Points -62%

AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	241698 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (963 - 245629, n=14)	101518 Points -58%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	33858 Points -86%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=145, last 2 years)	24985 Points -90%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384	1693 Points -99%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	585 Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	Points -100%

在图形测试中，红米 K70 Pro 凭借其 Adreno 750.特别是在 GFXBench 中，它的性能经常超过努比亚红魔 9 Pro并能在屏幕数值上充分利用面板的 120 Hz 频率。不过，在屏幕外数值和 3DMark 结果中可以看到波动--可能是由于热引起的性能下降。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5150 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4791 Points
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3565 Points -26%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3085 Points -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1202 Points -75%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	915 Points -81%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5143 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4874 Points
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3675 Points -25%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3068 Points -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1191 Points -76%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	926 Points -81%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	19566 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	18699 Points
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13987 Points -25%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11204 Points -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4483 Points -76%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3992 Points -79%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4336 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3897 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8648 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7564 Points
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5434 Points -28%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8668 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7523 Points
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5373 Points -29%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8480 Points +118%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6342 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5850 Points +50%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3898 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3833 Points -2%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	33142 Points +19%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	27783 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13159 Points -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7275 Points -74%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7170 Points -74%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	20131 Points +71%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11753 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	10622 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6828 Points -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6065 Points -48%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	114 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	111 fps -7%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	61 fps -49%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	467 fps
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	466 fps 0%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	465 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	462 fps -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	191 fps -59%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	134 fps -71%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps -32%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	62 fps -48%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	327 fps +2%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	321 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	321 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	214 fps -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	111 fps -65%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	95 fps -70%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	117 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	107 fps
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	62 fps -42%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 fps -51%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	259 fps +16%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	223 fps
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	221 fps -1%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	170 fps -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	73 fps -67%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps -70%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	82 fps +14%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	72 fps
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -17%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -57%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	138 fps
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	135 fps -2%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	129 fps -7%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	110 fps -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -68%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -74%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	66 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -6%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps -58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps -59%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 fps +1%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68 fps
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps -6%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps -68%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19 fps -72%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	91 fps +8%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	84 fps
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -29%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps -55%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	181 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	166 fps
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	162 fps -2%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	135 fps -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps -67%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -70%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	38 fps +19%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	32 fps
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	31 fps -3%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	24 fps -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.5 fps -70%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7.9 fps -75%

红米 K70 Pro 在浏览器速度方面毫不逊色，与中端机型相比，它在基准测试结果中的优势也非常明显。网站加载速度很快，滚动浏览也很流畅。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120)	195.426 Points +13%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Chrome 120)	70.022 Points -60%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro (Chrome 123)	173.045 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (64.1 - 241, n=19)	152.3 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)	134.031 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)	131.393 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=171, last 2 years)	125.2 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)	83.784 Points -52%
Realme GT5	67.947 Points -61%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro	218 runs/min
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120)	215 runs/min -1%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Chrome 120)	69.6 runs/min -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69.6 - 311, n=16)	207 runs/min -5%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)	180 runs/min -17%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=153, last 2 years)	143.5 runs/min -34%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)	116 runs/min -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)	112 runs/min -49%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro (Chrome 123)	164 Points
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120)	162 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69 - 212, n=15)	161.7 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)	140 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)	126 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=161, last 2 years)	117.9 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)	86 Points -48%
Realme GT5 (Realme Browser 40)	67 Points -59%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (142 - 310, n=9)	208 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro (Chrome 123)	197 Points
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120)	196 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)	157 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=80, last 2 years)	149.9 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)	135 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)	92 Points -53%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120)	70135 Points +31%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Chrome 120)	25953 Points -51%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro (Chrome 123)	53511 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 72665, n=19)	50413 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)	46286 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)	41576 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)	39060 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=213, last 2 years)	38624 Points -28%
Realme GT5 (Realme Browser 40)	24563 Points -54%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Realme GT5 (Realme Browser 40)	1837.3 ms * -141%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=169, last 2 years)	1515 ms * -99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)	1296.2 ms * -70%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)	1012.6 ms * -33%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)	1007.2 ms * -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (546 - 2066, n=16)	841 ms * -10%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro (Chrome 123)	761.9 ms *
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Chrome 120)	679.5 ms * +11%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro (Edge 120)	653 ms * +14%

* ... smaller is better

在存储速度方面，红米 K70 Pro 的 UFS 4.0 内存表现出色。AndroBench 的数值非常好，尤其是在读写方面。不过，在写入小数据块时会出现一些小问题。

	Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro	Realme GT5	Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G	Samsung Galaxy A55 5G	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G	Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		18%	8%	-51%	-40%	29%	-2%	-37%
Sequential Read 256KB	4006.87	3475.6 -13%	3824.7 -5%	1688.53 -58%	1921.64 -52%	4164.08 4%	3608 ?(3249 - 4384, n=26) -10%	1893 ?(226 - 4512, n=200, last 2 years) -53%
Sequential Write 256KB	3345.81	3117.44 -7%	3642.57 9%	831.44 -75%	1702.4 -49%	3199.98 -4%	2530 ?(555 - 3348, n=26) -24%	1478 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=200, last 2 years) -56%
Random Read 4KB	372.75	479.83 29%	355.7 -5%	351.47 -6%	248.21 -33%	442.82 19%	406 ?(218 - 483, n=26) 9%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=200, last 2 years) -25%
Random Write 4KB	354.12	577.13 63%	467.74 32%	132.11 -63%	265.29 -25%	691.17 95%	421 ?(152.9 - 730, n=26) 19%	312 ?(9.4 - 753, n=200, last 2 years) -12%

游戏 - 高达 90 fps

为了评估 Adreno GPU在日常使用基准测试之外，我们使用合作伙伴GameBench 提供的工具对 PlayStore 中的两款游戏进行了测试。.

虽然显示屏支持 120 Hz 的刷新率，但我们在第一人称射击游戏《死亡扳机 2》中 "只 "获得了 60 fps 的帧率，而理论上 HFR 游戏的帧率应高达 144 Hz。根据 GFXBench 的强大屏幕数值，这出乎我们的意料。这可能与软件优化不足有关。

在《PUBG Mobile 》中，低细节下的 90 fps 也证实了这一假设。在高清设置下，红米 K70 Pro 可以达到典型的 60 帧/秒，而在最高细节级别（UHD）下，红米 K70 Pro 可以稳定运行在 40 帧/秒。

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro; Dead Trigger 2: Ø59.9 (49-61)

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø89.4 (80-91)

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.8 (56-61)

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (35-41)

排放 - 适度节流

温度

在日常使用中，红米 K70 Pro 能够很好地控制表面温度，但我们在烧机基准测试中测得了超过 45.2 度的相当高的废热。这导致在 3DMark 的 "野外生活压力测试 "中，系统性能下降了 20% 至 30%。散热更好的（游戏）智能手机，如努比亚红魔 9 Pro的骁龙 8 代 3骁龙 8 代 3 处理器的节流明显降低，整体性能水平更高。

Max. Load

Idle


45.2 °C	44.2 °C	42.1 °C
45.1 °C	45.4 °C	44.4 °C
45.2 °C	45.1 °C	44.6 °C

Maximum: 45.4 °C
Average: 44.6 °C


41.1 °C	44.9 °C	43.9 °C
41.2 °C	42.1 °C	44.3 °C
41.5 °C	43.8 °C	44.1 °C

Maximum: 44.9 °C
Average: 43 °C

Power Supply (max.) 25.3 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.7 % +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 % +39%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	91.4 % +28%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	78.7 % +10%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	71.4 %
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	% -100%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.5 % +31%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98.9 % +30%
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	94.3 % +24%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	76 %
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	66.8 % -12%
Realme GT5 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	% -100%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	99.5 % +27%
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	78.6 %
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	65.2 % -17%

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22.2 (20.7-27.3)

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.8 (12-18)

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.59 (5.56-5.63)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø7.07 (7.05-7.08)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø30.2 (29.2-31)

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø82.7 (73.4-102.9)

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.4 (43.6-55.4)

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø23.1 (23.1-23.1)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.6 (25.4-25.7)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø109.7 (102.5-112.2)

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø23.7 (23.6-23.7)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø117.1 (117-117.1)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø29.2 (29.1-29.2)

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø23 (21.2-27)

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø11.4 (11-16.9)

Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø28.8 (28.8-28.9)

发言人

红米 K70 Pro 有两个扬声器，但发声器位于听筒内，因此无法产生均匀的立体声。底端的扬声器音量非常大：我们测得的最大音量超过 92 分贝。缺乏深沉的低音，粉红噪声也显示出中频的升频曲线。总的来说，红米 K70 Pro 的中频表现还是非常不错的。

如果你想使用外部声音输出，可以使用有线 USB 端口或无线蓝牙 5.4。后者使用 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LDAC 和 LHDC V5 编解码器。不支持 LC3 或 aptX Lossless。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 120 瓦充电

耗电量

集成的锂离子聚合物电池容量为 5000 毫安时，充电速度非常快，功率为 120 瓦。由于采用了自主研发的小米 P2 和小米 G1 芯片，尽管充电时间较长，但仍能保证较长的电池使用寿命。出门在外的用户还可以使用常见的快速充电协议（QC3+、PD3.0）为电池快速充电。使用附带的电源适配器，我们用了大约 30 分钟就充满了电。赶时间的人可以激活boost 模式，在 20 分钟内为电池充电。但不支持无线充电。

K70 Pro 的功耗在空闲模式和负载状态下都很低。不过，即使对于Snapdragon 8 Gen3 智能手机来说，16 瓦的峰值功率也不算低。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.02 / 0.09 Watt
Idle	1 / 1.21 / 1.32 Watt
Load	7.74 / 15.99 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro 5000 mAh	Realme GT5 5240 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A55 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-11%	-10%	5%	-5%	6%	4%
Idle Minimum *	1	1.04 -4%	1.11 -11%	0.85 15%	1.22 -22%	0.859 ?(0.4 - 1.5, n=15) 14%	0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=161, last 2 years) 12%
Idle Average *	1.21	1.43 -18%	1.14 6%	1.51 -25%	1.47 -21%	1.231 ?(0.81 - 1.9, n=15) -2%	1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=161, last 2 years) -21%
Idle Maximum *	1.32	1.5 -14%	1.16 12%	1.71 -30%	1.58 -20%	1.363 ?(0.85 - 2.6, n=15) -3%	1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=161, last 2 years) -23%
Load Average *	7.74	11.38 -47%	12.33 -59%	4.87 37%	8.09 -5%	8.74 ?(3.34 - 14.7, n=14) -13%	6.58 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=155, last 2 years) 15%
Load Maximum *	15.99	11.47 28%	15.34 4%	11.73 27%	9.49 41%	10.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=14) 32%	9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=155, last 2 years) 38%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.3 (1.073-15.8)

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.78 (1.21-13.1)

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.969 (0.803-1.288)

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.899 (0.848-1.176)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13.5 (12.8-14.3)

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.9 (9.14-13.2)

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.969 (0.803-1.288)

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.899 (0.848-1.176)

电池寿命

红米 K70 Pro 的电池续航时间非常出色，即使在负载情况下仅使用 3 小时就会停止工作。当我们看到调整后的显示屏亮度值（150 cd/m²）时，一切都变得明朗起来。在这方面，小米智能手机与 Poco X6 Pro在 WiFi 上网方面处于同一水平。此外，K70 Pro 在没有 WiFi 的情况下也能连续播放超过 21 小时的视频。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		28h 18min
WiFi Websurfing (chrome 123)		15h 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		21h 13min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 47min

	Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro 5000 mAh	Realme GT5 5240 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A55 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 5000 mAh	Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro 6500 mAh
Battery Runtime		-2%	8%	23%	21%	8%
Reader / Idle	1698		1815 7%	2202 30%	1586 -7%
H.264	1273		967 -24%	1511 19%	937 -26%
WiFi v1.3	959	939 -2%	942 -2%	1077 12%	913 -5%	1036 8%
Load	167		251 50%	220 32%	373 123%

Pros

+ 明亮的 120 Hz AMOLED 面板

+ WQHD+ 高分辨率

+ 性能强劲

+ 快速存储

+ 快速加载时间

+ WiFi 7

Cons

- 进口（中国 ROM）

- LTE 覆盖范围存在空白

- 仅 USB 2.0

- 前置摄像头无 UHD 选项

红米 K70 Pro 的评价

红米 K70 Pro 在中端市场提供了一个全方位的无忧组合，并专注于最高性能。以不到 500 元的价格，它提供了旗舰级硬件（骁龙 8 代 3、UFS 4.0 内存、DDR5x 内存）与可能是市场上最亮的 1440p 显示屏之一的组合：这是目前无与伦比的套餐。不过，在购买前应仔细考虑中国 ROM 的限制。全球机型的发布应该能解决这个问题，但这很可能会以价格上涨为代价。如果买家想花很少的钱买到类似的强大硬件，最有可能在中兴通讯的高端机型中找到。努比亚 Z60 Ultra, 红魔 9 Pro).

红米 K70 Pro 以低廉的价格提供了最好的硬件。

不过，在红米 K70 Pro 的某些方面，降低成本的压力显而易见。小米手机的潜在购买者不应该对 IP 认证、无线充电或高于平均水平的相机系统等高端功能抱有期望。谷歌谷歌 Pixel 8或三星Galaxy A55都是合适的替代品，包括 eSIM 和更好的频率覆盖，适合在中国以外的国家使用。Poco F5 Pro Poco F5 Pro拥有 WQHD+ 分辨率，在中端手机中也能提供充足的计算能力，而不受进口手机的限制。

价格和供应情况

红米 K70 Pro 的进口售价不到 490 美元，包括来自Trading Shenzhen 的价格。.

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro - 04/11/2024 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

84%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

54 / 70 → 77%

Weight

88%

Battery

91%

Display

92%

Games Performance

71 / 64 → 100%

Application Performance

95 / 86 → 100%

Temperature

85%

Noise

100%

Audio

75 / 90 → 83%

Camera

71%

Average

82%

87%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 1459 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 473355 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米红米 K70 Pro 智能手机评测：出色的硬件，中档的价格 [Poco F6 Pro］

Marcus Herbrich, 2024-04-17 (Update: 2024-08-15)

小米红米 K70 Pro 智能手机评测：出色的硬件，中档的价格 [Poco F6 Pro］

4061 尼特的价格不到 500 美元，令人印象深刻！

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 无 IP 等级

尺寸比较

设备 - 机载红外喷射器

软件 - HyperOS

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 包括 5G

电话和语音质量

照相机 - OIS 作为套件的一部分

配件和保修

输入设备和操作

显示屏 - 体面的 AMOLED 面板

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 现代高通 SoC

游戏 - 高达 90 fps

排放 - 适度节流

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro audio analysis

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G audio analysis

电池寿命 - 120 瓦充电

耗电量

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

红米 K70 Pro 的评价

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison