微星 Katana A15 AI 笔记本电脑评测：RTX 4070 玩家因节约成本而受伤
近在咫尺，却无从下手。
微星凭借 Katana A15 AI 进入竞争激烈的中端游戏笔记本电脑领域。这款 15 英寸笔记本电脑配备了强大的 Ryzen 处理器和GeForce RTX 4060 或 RTX 4070，但在一个关键方面却令人大失所望。Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论 - 微星走了太多弯路
Katana A15 AI 与最近评测过的宏碁 Nitro V 16 ANV16 有着同样的缺点。考虑到其相当可观的价格，它的显示屏并不尽如人意。联想LOQ 15ARP9、华硕TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZI4-LP031和惠普Victus 16-s0177ng等几款更实惠的RTX 4070笔记本电脑提供了100%的sRGB覆盖率（至少根据各自的规格表），而微星笔记本电脑的覆盖率不足70%，显示的图像相当苍白无力。
微星还应该在其他方面多下功夫，比如外观廉价、摇摇欲坠的机箱、电池容量和运行时间不足、触摸板太小以及扬声器效果一般。这里没有 USB 4，非传统的键盘布局可能需要一些时间来适应。
Katana A15 在少数几个方面表现突出，其中两条内存和两个 M.2 插槽尤其值得称道。总的来说，由于我们发现的诸多问题，很难推荐购买这款笔记本电脑，尤其是考虑到它的价格（测试机型的起价为 1,500 欧元）。一些竞争对手的系统速度明显更快。其中一些还更便宜。
Pros
Cons
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 76.4%  | MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,599.00 MSI Katana A15 AI 15.6” 16... 2. $49.99 230W 240W AC Charger for MSI... 3. $64.99 200W Katana A17 A15 Charger ... List Price: 1500 EUR | 2.3 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
2. 86.6% v7 (old)  | HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,250.00 List Price: 1900 EUR | 2.4 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.10" 1920x1080 137 PPI IPS |
3. 85.1% v7 (old)  | HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $989.49 HP - Victus 16.1" Gaming Lap... 2. $115.99 19.5V 11.8A Power Supply 230... List Price: 1630 EUR | 2.4 kg | 24 mm | 16.10" 1920x1080 137 PPI IPS |
4. 85.7% v7 (old)  | Aorus 15 BSF Intel Core i7-13700H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $52.99 240W 230W Laptop Charger for... 2. $59.99 230W 180W AC Charger Fit for... 3. $45.99 Smatree Hard EVA Protective ... List Price: 1749 Euro | 2.4 kg | 20.9 mm | 15.60" 2560x1440 188 PPI IPS |
5. 88.4% v7 (old)  | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $999.99 List Price: 1600 USD | 2.5 kg | 26.8 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
在进行测试的德国，Katana A15 AI 目前有两种配置。售价超过 1100 欧元的 B8VG-451 型号配备了 Ryzen 7 8845HS, GeForce RTX 4060 笔记本电脑和 512 GB 固态硬盘，而我们的测试机型 B8VG-459 售价为 1,500 欧元，配备了 Ryzen 9 8945HS, GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑和 1 TB 固态硬盘。两款产品均配备了 144 Hz 全高清 IPS 雾面显示屏和 16 GB DDR5-5600 内存。
规格
案例
购买经济型游戏笔记本电脑的人往往不得不满足于劣质的外壳。Katana 的情况也是如此。由于大量使用塑料，这款机箱给人的感觉并不特别优质。深色的机身也很容易沾染指纹，稳定性也很一般。好的一面是，这款笔记本电脑的做工相对精良，最大开启角度为 180°，这一点总是很受欢迎。
微星笔记本电脑的尺寸和重量与竞争对手相当。系统重量为 2.3 千克，比 2.4 至 2.5 千克的竞争对手略轻。
连接性
对于那些可以忍受没有读卡器和上一代 USB 端口的用户，Katana A15 AI 提供了丰富的端口选择。机箱左侧边缘有一个电源接口和两个 USB 端口（一个 3.0，另一个 2.0），右侧有一个音频插孔、USB-A 3.0、USB-C 3.0（带 DisplayPort）、HDMI 2.1 和一个 RJ45 千兆网口。由于一些端口位于机箱边缘的中间位置，线缆可能会妨碍用户握鼠标的手。
交流
内置的 RZ616 Wi-Fi 6E 模块来自联发科，上传速度略低于平均水平，下载速度略高于平均水平。
网络摄像头
不出所料，720p 网络摄像头生成的图像并不十分清晰，色彩准确度处于中等水平。没有隐私保护盖。
配件
该笔记本附带了几本信息手册和一个 200 瓦的充电器（包括电缆），重约 0.7 千克。
维护
由于其中一颗螺丝上贴有 "出厂封条 "贴纸，而且该设备是存储设备，因此我们没有打开机箱。不过，只要以专业方式进行维护和升级，贴纸应该是可以撕掉的（至少在德国是这样）。
可持续性
纸板是主要的包装材料，不过微星也使用塑料薄膜包装某些部件，如笔记本电脑、充电器（包括电缆）和信息手册。
保修
在德国，保修期通常为 2 年。
输入设备
键盘
输入设备的整体性能良好，但仍有改进的余地。首先，键盘的布局可能会让一些用户不满意。微星继续使用非传统布局，在多个方面偏离了德国标准。三列数字键盘取代了通常的四列布局，这需要一些时间来适应。虽然对于一款游戏笔记本电脑来说，键入体验还算不错，但键入感觉不如机械键盘，反馈也没有机械键盘细腻。好的一面是，喜欢多彩设置的用户会喜欢 RGB 灯光效果。
触摸板
触摸板的尺寸为 10.5 x 6.5 厘米，对于 15 英寸笔记本电脑来说相对较小。虽然表面看起来足够光滑，但其滑动性能还有待提高。其精度也是如此，并不十分理想。此外，触摸板在使用过程中容易发出嘎吱嘎吱的响声，给人留下的印象并不是很好。这也提醒我们该机箱的制造质量不尽如人意。
显示屏
虽然触摸板并不出色，但 Katana A15 最大的弱点是它的显示屏，如前所述，它的色彩空间覆盖率很低，只有 65% sRGB。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 77 %
Center on Battery: 277 cd/m²
Contrast: 1458:1 (Black: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.01
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
45.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
43.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.322
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG CMN N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | HP Omen 16-xf0376ng BOE0B81, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1", 165 Hz | HP Victus 16-r0077ng CMN162D, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1", 144 Hz | Aorus 15 BSF Sharp LQ156T1JW05, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6", 165 Hz | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 59% | 52% | 89% | 58% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 43.6 | 72.1 65% | 66.7 53% | 98.2 125% | 70.4 61% |
| sRGB Coverage | 65.1 | 99.6 53% | 98 51% | 99.9 53% | 99.6 53% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 45.1 | 72.3 60% | 69 53% | 85.7 90% | 72.6 61% |
| Response Times | 59% | 54% | 61% | 63% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 28.5 ? | 12.3 ? 57% | 13.3 ? 53% | 11.3 ? 60% | 7 ? 75% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 18.3 ? | 7.2 ? 61% | 8.2 ? 55% | 7 ? 62% | 9.1 ? 50% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | 8% | 29% | 9% | 33% | |
| Brightness middle | 277 | 350 26% | 308 11% | 299 8% | 355.3 28% |
| Brightness | 259 | 338 31% | 285 10% | 282 9% | 340 31% |
| Brightness Distribution | 77 | 91 18% | 85 10% | 82 6% | 91 18% |
| Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.35 -84% | 0.25 -32% | 0.31 -63% | 0.32 -68% |
| Contrast | 1458 | 1000 -31% | 1232 -16% | 965 -34% | 1110 -24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 3.29 23% | 1.3 70% | 2.24 48% | 1.13 74% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.14 | 8.47 56% | 2.76 86% | 4.29 78% | 2.78 85% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.01 | 2.23 26% | 0.92 69% | 2.62 13% | 0.32 89% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 3.2 11% | 1.7 53% | 3 17% | 1.4 61% |
| Gamma | 2.322 95% | 2.131 103% | 2.167 102% | 2.086 105% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 7182 91% | 6317 103% | 6767 96% | 6289 103% | 6372 102% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 42% /
27% | 45% /
38% | 53% /
34% | 51% /
42% |
* ... smaller is better
由于上述原因，再加上背光亮度非常适中（约 259 cd/m²），显示屏上的内容往往难以辨认。简而言之，这样的显示面板完全不适合这个价位的产品。
至少从 IPS 标准来看，144 Hz 屏幕在某些方面确实不错。但这并不能说明什么。它的对比度为 1458:1，相当不错，0.19 cd/m² 的黑色值也没什么可挑剔的。
另一方面，它的响应时间落后于竞争对手。好在没有出现 OLED 面板常见的 PWM 闪烁。
可视角度还算不错，但不是特别令人印象深刻。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 28.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8698 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
有些迟钝的微星中心在 "用户场景 "下提供了从 "超级电池 "到 "极致性能 "的各种模式，其中一些模式会导致风扇行为发生显著变化。我们的所有测量和测试都是在 "微星人工智能引擎 "模式下进行的，该模式可最大限度地提高图形性能，同时将 CPU 的 TDP 保持在 "平衡 "模式下的水平。
| 赛博朋克 2077 循环 (FHD/Ultra) | 微星 AI 引擎 | 极致性能 | 平衡 | 静音模式 |
| 噪音 | 52 dB(A) | 52 dB(A) | 48 dB(A) | 39 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 74 fps | 74 fps | 64 fps | 62 fps |
| CPU PL1 (HWiNFO) | 50 W | 54 W | 50 W | 35 W |
| CPU PL2 (HWiNFO) | 54 W | 65 W | 54 W | 40 W |
处理器
... Ryzen 9 8945HSKatana A15 AI 中的 Ryzen 9 8945HS 性能既不出众，也不令人失望。其结果与 Ryzen 7 7840HS惠普 Omen 16 中的 Ryzen 7 7840HS，而 Ryzen 7 7745HX在所有测试中均比联想Legion Pro 5 16 中的 Ryzen 7 7745HX 快约 10%。8945HS 具有 8 个 CPU 内核，通过 SMT 可同时处理多达 16 个线程。通过集成图形切换，简单的任务，如办公、视频播放和网页浏览，可由处理器集成的 Radeon 780M图形处理器处理，从而节省了能源。通过 MUX 开关，可以停用集成图形处理器，完全依靠 Nvidia 显卡。
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
| CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 -2! | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (26817 - 28836, n=4) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (113231 - 122633, n=4) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (4839 - 5077, n=4) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (119279 - 125044, n=4) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (15026 - 15661, n=4) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (60420 - 65746, n=4) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (86495 - 169431, n=4) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (1029 - 1135, n=4) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (14216 - 15588, n=4) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (33371 - 40815, n=4) | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
系统性能
在 PCMark 10 中，Katana 的系统性能一直很好，与竞争对手的表现类似。对于 5,600 MT/s 模块而言，内存数据传输速度令人印象深刻。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7436 - 8312, n=3) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9672 - 11290, n=3) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9502 - 10332, n=3) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (11907 - 13363, n=3) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1767 - 1830, n=2) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1686 - 1783, n=2) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1935 - 1960, n=2) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1489 - 1672, n=2) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=161, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (268 - 324, n=3) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 328, n=150, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (226 - 269, n=3) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (488 - 586, n=4) | |
| Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=176, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7473 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (62371 - 68976, n=4) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (49966 - 61710, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (78351 - 93153, n=4) | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (91.2 - 110.4, n=4) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在这方面，情况就没有那么令人印象深刻了。根据 LatencyMon 工具，在执行某些任务时，延迟可能会激增。尽管如此，在竞争对手的系统中，只有Legion Pro 5 能保持在 1000 微秒以下。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
WDC 的 1 TB 固态硬盘（型号 PC SN560）可能不是同类产品中速度最快的，但其性能远非令人失望。虽然我们的循环测试显示性能会随着时间的推移出现一些波动，但这些波动仍在可接受的范围内，这一点我们无法对Legion Pro 5 说三道四。
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | |
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
GeForce RTX 4070 预计将在未来几周或几个月内被新的型号所取代。虽然截至 2024 年，RTX 4070 仍是笔记本电脑领域速度极快的游戏 GPU，但其有限的 8 GB VRAM 越来越多地成为瓶颈，有时甚至在全高清环境下也是如此。最近发布的游戏，如 夺宝奇兵夺宝奇兵》等最近发布的游戏突出表明，对于那些认真对待游戏的玩家来说，至少 12 GB VRAM 的显卡才是最好的选择。换句话说，RTX 4070 可能不是一项长期投资。
还有一点需要考虑的是，微星为 RTX 4070 选择了相对较低的 105 瓦 TGP，尽管该 GPU 最高支持 140 瓦。这一决定反映在基准测试结果中，Katana 落后于竞争对手。在合成图形测试中，搭载 RTX 4070 的竞争对手平均比它高出 9% 到 16%。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 -1! | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 28162 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 147014 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 61833 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23834 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9759 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
值得庆幸的是，15 英寸显卡在游戏中的表现要比基准测试稍好一些，其成绩与我们数据库中搭载 RTX 4070 的普通笔记本电脑相当。一般来说，显卡可以在最大设置下以 1920 x 1080 的原始分辨率流畅运行几乎所有现代游戏。不过，在 CPU 密集型或优化较差的游戏中，如 星球大战逃犯等游戏中，它可能难以提供足够高的帧速率。在这种情况下，DLSS 升频技术就派上用场了。
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 -2! | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG -1! | |
| Aorus 15 BSF -2! | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng -1! | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng -2! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (30.7 - 90.7, n=36) | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 208, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (66.7 - 128.5, n=26) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (48.3 - 141.6, n=61) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (41 - 131.9, n=63) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=177, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (76.3 - 234, n=62) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
| Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15 BSF | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (89.7 - 191.2, n=65) | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 174.9 | 164.8 | 108.7 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 158.8 | 136.1 | 138.6 | 129.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 135.6 | 101.1 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 80.6 | 74.7 | 52.1 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 130.5 | 108.2 | 104.9 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 113.8 | 96.2 | 84 | |
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 323 | 322 | 321 | |
| Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 45.9 | 39.6 | 31.9 | |
| Space Marine 2 (2024) | 75.2 | 74.2 | 73.1 | |
| Final Fantasy XVI (2024) | 68.1 | 59 | 50.6 | |
| God of War Ragnarök (2024) | 111.7 | 97.9 | 90.5 | |
| Until Dawn (2024) | 88.2 | 62.7 | 46.9 | |
| Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) | 121 | 87 | 81 | |
| Stalker 2 (2024) | 54.5 | 49.9 | 43.5 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (74.7 - 103.6, n=29) | |
| Average of class Gaming (7.4 - 164.5, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (30.7 - 90.7, n=36) | |
我们通过运行 赛博朋克 2077运行了大约 30 分钟。结果是Katana A15 的帧速率非常稳定，没有出现意外的帧数下降。
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra fps chart
排放量
噪音排放
AI 模式在空闲时噪音水平适中，只是偶尔会有风扇活动，但在系统紧张时会产生大量噪音。在运行《赛博朋克 2077》时，系统噪音高达 52 dB(A)，许多用户可能会感到不悦，尤其是在不使用耳机的情况下。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25 / 26 / 27 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 40 / 50 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Aorus 15 BSF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | -7% | -16% | 7% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 24 4% | 25 -0% | 24 4% | 23.2 7% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 25 -0% | 28 -12% | 25 -0% | 23.2 7% |
| Idle Average * | 26 | 29 -12% | 29 -12% | 31 -19% | 23.2 11% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27 | 32 -19% | 30 -11% | 37 -37% | 26.2 3% |
| Load Average * | 40 | 44 -10% | 43 -8% | 51 -28% | 31.4 21% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 52 | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 50 | 46 8% | 48 4% | 57 -14% | 53.8 -8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 44 | 46 | 48.4 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在运行图形密集型应用程序时，游戏笔记本往往会明显发热。这不会让任何人感到意外。卡塔纳 A15 的最高温度为顶部 47 °C、底部 46 °C，这让人在使用时有些不舒服，但仍比一些竞争对手要低一些（请看下表）。
好的一面是，掌托在任何情况下都能保持相对凉爽，确保了使用过程中的舒适度。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Aorus 15 BSF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -2% | -4% | -5% | 12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 48 | 49 -2% | 51 -6% | 48 -0% | 41.8 13% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 46 | 57 -24% | 54 -17% | 47 -2% | 41.4 10% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 34 | 31 9% | 37 -9% | 39 -15% | 29 15% |
| Idle Bottom * | 34 | 31 9% | 29 15% | 35 -3% | 30.4 11% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
由于时钟频率较高，与我们使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 进行的压力测试相比，《赛博朋克 2077》游戏负载下的组件温度更高。这款角色扮演游戏导致 CPU 和 GPU 的温度升高到近 80 °C。
发言人
2.0 扬声器表现平平。它们只在高音方面表现出色。我们的音频分析表明，低音和中音同样令人失望。惠普等竞争厂商（参见 Omen 16 进行比较）往往在音频系统上投入更多精力。81 分贝的最大音量也有待改进。
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
AMD Ryzen 芯片因能耗适中而广受赞誉。虽然这在负载情况下是正确的，但系统空闲时的能耗却高得令人怀疑。即使激活了图形切换功能，Katana A15 在 AI 模式下的能耗也高达 13 至 23 瓦，超过了我们测试竞争对手系统时的能耗值。
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 2.8 Watt |
| Idle | 13 / 18 / 23 Watt |
| Load |
63 / 159 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Aorus 15 BSF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 4% | -3% | -2% | -24% | -31% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 13 | 9 31% | 8 38% | 7 46% | 8.1 38% | 13.6 ? -5% |
| Idle Average * | 18 | 14 22% | 13 28% | 12 33% | 15.9 12% | 19 ? -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23 | 20 13% | 22 4% | 20 13% | 37.2 -62% | 26.9 ? -17% |
| Load Average * | 63 | 84 -33% | 86 -37% | 94 -49% | 90.9 -44% | 106.1 ? -68% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 156 | |||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 156.8 | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 159 | 176 -11% | 233 -47% | 247 -55% | 263.5 -66% | 250 ? -57% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 140.9 | 141.8 | 175.8 | 189.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption - Cyberpunk 2077
Power consumption - external monitor
电池寿命
其空闲时的耗电量相当高，而仅 53.5 Wh 的电池容量也相当有限。这两个因素加在一起，导致其电池续航时间并不理想。在我们的 Wi-Fi 网页浏览测试中，将显示屏亮度设置为 150 cd/m²，Katana A15 勉勉强强维持了 4 个小时，这个结果令人大跌眼镜。大多数竞争对手的电池容量更大，因此续航时间明显更长。
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh | HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Aorus 15 BSF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 45% | 80% | 161% | 1% | 59% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 237 | 344 45% | 426 80% | 619 161% | 240 1% | 378 ? 59% |
| Reader / Idle | 654 | 392 | 574 ? | |||
| H.264 | 541 | 413 ? | ||||
| Load | 132 | 61 | 85.8 ? |
笔记本检查评级
如果 Katana A15 AI 的外壳质量更高、显示效果更好、电池容量更大，其价格就会更容易被接受。然而，从目前的情况来看，该系统几乎没有竞争力，而且与一些竞争对手相比，感觉价格过高。
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG
- 12/20/2024 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
