data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c32d7/c32d7e9a56910b490842c012472c69c8805ec125" alt="Teaser"
联想Legion Go S 游戏掌机评测--Steam Deck 杀手还是 Windows 受害者?
Windows、SteamOS 还是两者都有?
联想Legion Go S 的目标是成为游戏掌上电脑中的万金油。联想目前提供的是 Windows 系统,从 5 月份开始还将提供 Valve 的游戏操作系统。不过,由于其 APU 和 Windows 系统的运行速度稍慢,这款掌上电脑在我们的测试中表现并不尽如人意。Marc Herter, 👁 Marc Herter (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论:在游戏性能和价格之间徘徊
联想又派出了一位代表,通过一款 Windows 手持设备加入移动游戏大战。Legion Go S 或多或少应该是一款更便宜的替代产品,但在我们看来,它仍然达不到这个价位的标准。价格在 600 美元至 750 美元之间的同价位替代产品包括 Steam Deck OLED 1TB、华硕 华硕 ROG Ally或联想自己的 Legion Go 8APU1.因此,Legion Go S 将很难与之竞争。尽管从Legion Go 到Legion Go S,联想做了很多小改进。
无论是外壳、明亮的屏幕还是手持设备的控制器,都没有明显的偷工减料。一切都给人高品质的感觉。Legion Go S 在软技能方面可与众多其他优秀掌上电脑媲美,其音质也明显优于Legion Go。但是,所有这些赞誉都只能持续到了解其内置 APU 的性能之后。这是因为 AMD Ryzen Z2 Go的计算能力已经过时。即使是采用 2022 年处理器的掌上电脑,在某种程度上也比它更强大。你可以争论它的电池续航时间,也可以争论这款掌上电脑到底能让你玩多久。Go S 的性能足以应付很多游戏。但简单地说,人们喜欢在这款掌上电脑上玩的可能不会是 AAA 级游戏。
Windows 系统确实不利于这款游戏掌上电脑。不过,联想还是有办法的。Legion Go S 搭载了 Valve 的 Steam 操作系统,将在几周后发布。这将使该掌上电脑成为 Steam Deck 值得关注的替代品,尤其是在价格合适的情况下。最终,我们的测试还显示 蒸汽甲板 APU的性能明显低于 AMD Ryzen Z2 Go.由于采用了 Arch Linux,Steam OS 显得更加轻薄,而且有更多的资源可用于所有重要的事情。另一方面,在我们的测试设备上,Windows 有时会占用处理器 10% 到 20% 的性能和内存,甚至无法运行游戏。这样一来,用户就不得不问自己,他们最喜欢的软件和游戏在 Steam 机器上是否兼容。
Pros
Cons
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenovo Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go ⎘ AMD Radeon 680M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $599.99 Lenovo Legion Go 8.8" 144Hz ... 2. $619.98 Lenovo Legion Go 8.8" 144Hz ... 3. $709.99 Lenovo Legion Go 512GB Gamin... List Price: 700€ | 738 g | 22.6 mm | 8.00" 1920x1200 283 PPI IPS-Grade | |
Lenovo Legion Go AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $619.98 List Price: 800€ | 845 g | 41 mm | 8.80" 2560x1600 343 PPI IPS | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $12.98 Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protecto... 2. $25.99 PowerHOOD 65W USB-C AC/DC Ad... 3. $12.99 Vaxson 3-Pack Screen Protect... | 692 g | 35 mm | 7.00" 1920x1080 315 PPI OLED | |
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU ⎘ AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $619.97 List Price: 679€ | 640 g | 49 mm | 7.40" 1280x800 204 PPI OLED | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $529.99 List Price: 799€ | 611 g | 21.22 mm | 7.00" 1920x1080 315 PPI IPS | |
Aokzoe A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U ⎘ AMD Radeon 680M ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: $909.99 List Price: 1000 USD | 735 g | 21 mm | 8.00" 1920x1200 283 PPI IPS |
联想将推出多个版本的Legion Go S。今天,我们测试的是 Windows 版本的掌上电脑,但另一款搭载 Steam OS 的Legion Go S 将在几周后推出。这意味着 Steam Deck 可能很快就不再是掌上电脑市场上唯一依赖 Linux 的主流产品。在此之前,我们只能在Legion Go S 上使用 Windows 操作系统。除了屏幕稍大之外,Legion Go S 的处理器也比 Steam Deck 稍强。不过,新的 Ryzen Z2 Go 给人的感觉更像是解冻产品。四颗 Zen 3+ 内核和 Radeon 680M 是 2022 年的新产品。不过,就性能而言,Legion Go S 领先于 Steam Deck。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格 - 新款 AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
外壳 - 坚固、时尚,手感极佳
联想Legion Go S 采用光滑的白色塑料外壳,边缘圆润美观。尽管有 8 英寸的大屏幕,但这款手持设备看起来并不笨重,反而显得纤薄而现代。Legion Go S 上的所有控制按钮都很容易触及。手柄表面有磨砂质感,即使在长时间的游戏过程中握持也很舒适。总的来说,它给人一种超级稳定的感觉,没有任何吱吱作响或晃动。它的制造质量非常好,没有尖锐的边缘或不均匀的缝隙。
手持设备的 8 英寸大屏幕位于玻璃保护层之下,非常抢眼。背面的六角形大开口风扇确保硬件在满载情况下也能保持凉爽。
Legion Go S 比原来的 Steam Deck 稍大,重量也稍重。不过,它的重量还是比较合理的,我们的测试设备既没有特别重的感觉,也没有因为重量轻而给人廉价的印象。
连接性 - 从 USB4 到 mircoSD
联想Legion Go S 的端口选择一般。顶部有两个全功能 USB-C 端口(USB4),不仅可以实现高达 40 Gbit/s 的超快数据传输,还支持 DisplayPort 和 Power Delivery。因此,您不仅可以通过多种方式扩展设备的用途,还可以快速充电。旁边是一个耳机/耳麦插孔。
读卡器位于设备底部。遗憾的是,该设备的连接位置并不理想。例如,耳机线必须放在设备后面,以免悬挂在屏幕前面。两个 USB 端口靠得太近也不是最实用的。其他手持设备提供了更好的解决方案,将充电端口放在顶部和底部,从而提高了设备的易用性。
SD 读卡器
我们发现 联想Legion Go拥有手持设备中最快的读卡器之一。Legion Go S 的读卡速度则比较标准。不过,85 MB/s 左右的速度还是不错的。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (20.9 - 184, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
Aokzoe A1 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Aokzoe A1 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (74.7 - 260, n=11, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Lenovo Go S |
交流
在通信方面,联想Legion Go S 有很多可圈可点之处。5 GHz 和 6 GHz 网络的快速 Wi-Fi 可确保快速下载和低延迟在线游戏。蓝牙功能也可用于连接控制器、耳机或其他外围设备。
可持续性
联想Legion Go S 包装的第一点就是使用了大量泡沫。虽然这有利于保护设备,但由于泡沫体积大、密度低,很难回收利用。遗憾的是,没有关于产品碳足迹(PCF)的信息。
至少可以对设备进行维修。不过,拧开它并不容易:首先要拧下底部的螺丝,然后拧下顶部的塑料盖。然后拧下顶部的螺丝,小心地取下 L1 和 R1 按钮,按钮下面还有两颗螺丝。然后就可以取下背板了。
输入设备 - 指杆和触发器中的霍尔传感器
与Legion Go 相比,联想Legion Go S 没有可拆卸的控制器,而是依赖于固定的高品质解决方案。在使用了出色的 Zotac Zone 之后,Legion Go S 在控制器方面仍感觉有些松散。
控制器
触摸板和触摸屏
触摸板是 Windows 输入的一个实用补充,但它可以再大一些,更舒适一些。虽然触摸屏反应精确,但它似乎有吸附指纹的魔力。这意味着在浏览菜单或 Windows 时,触摸板往往是更好的选择。
显示屏 - 120 赫兹 16:10 IPS 显示屏
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 531.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 1171:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89, calibrated: 2.3
ΔE Greyscale 9.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
70.34% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.02% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.71% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Lenovo Go S LEN91C1, IPS-Grade, 1920x1200, 8", 120 Hz | Lenovo Legion Go Legion Go Display, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8", 144 Hz | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz | Ayaneo Kun Ayaneo 2K, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4", 60 Hz | Aokzoe A1 BOE0207, IPS, 1920x1200, 8", 60 Hz | Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED ANX7530 U, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4", 90 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 20% | -5% | 21% | 1% | 27% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 69.71 | 92.1 32% | 65.6 -6% | 93.52 34% | 72.3 4% | 99.6 43% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.02 | 99.56 1% | 92.1 -7% | 99.4 0% | 92.6 -6% | 100 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.34 | 90.09 28% | 67.9 -3% | 91.2 30% | 73.4 4% | 96.1 37% |
Response Times | 32% | 69% | 23% | 3% | 65% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30.8 ? | 20.8 ? 32% | 10.5 ? 66% | 24.2 ? 21% | 28.9 ? 6% | 9 ? 71% |
Response Time Black / White * | 21.2 ? | 14.4 ? 32% | 6 ? 72% | 16.2 ? 24% | 21.1 ? -0% | 9 ? 58% |
PWM Frequency | 700 | 20000 | 9970.7 | 360 ? | ||
Screen | 3% | 17% | 22% | -17% | 197% | |
Brightness middle | 538.8 | 411 -24% | 513 -5% | 680 26% | 328.4 -39% | 485 -10% |
Brightness | 509 | 413 -19% | 474 -7% | 678 33% | 323 -37% | 482 -5% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 80 -14% | 84 -10% | 91 -2% | 92 -1% | 98 5% |
Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.42 9% | 0.38 17% | 0.5 -9% | 0.39 15% | 0.03 93% |
Contrast | 1171 | 979 -16% | 1350 15% | 1360 16% | 842 -28% | 16167 1281% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.2 | 5.94 17% | 3.7 49% | 4 44% | 10.17 -41% | 2 72% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.5 | 10.56 16% | 8.3 34% | 9 28% | 18.14 -45% | 5 60% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.3 | 2.95 -28% | 1 57% | 1.07 53% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.5 | 0.92 90% | 5.1 46% | 9 5% | 12.7 -34% | 2 79% |
Gamma | 2.44 90% | 1.93 114% | 2.14 103% | 2 110% | 2.7 81% | 2 110% |
CCT | 9485 69% | 8064 81% | 7732 84% | 7188 90% | 12502 52% | 6336 103% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 18% /
11% | 27% /
20% | 22% /
22% | -4% /
-11% | 96% /
137% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
21.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.4 ms rise | |
↘ 9.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.6 ms rise | |
↘ 16.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8619 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
闪烁,正如我们之前在其前身 Legion Go在我们的测试设备上没有发现这种现象。不过,显示屏的响应时间有点慢。
其反光表面和约 500 cd/m² 的亮度并不适合户外使用,因为它必须面对一些强烈的反光。另一方面,该显示屏具有良好的视角稳定性,即使在较陡的视角下亮度会略有下降。即便如此,这在掌上电脑上也不一定是个缺点。
性能 - AMD 新款 Ryzen Z2 Go
联想Legion Go S 有两个版本,都配备了 AMD Ryzen Z2 Go处理器。不同之处在于它们的存储空间:一个型号有 0.5 TB SSD 和 16 GB 内存,另一个型号有 1 TB 存储空间和 32 GB 内存。AMD Z2 Go 目前在联想独家销售。不过,未来还计划推出配备更强大的 Z1 Extreme 处理器的版本。
测试条件
Legion Space 为手持设备的功耗和冷却(风扇行为)提供了各种配置选项。不过,没有像 Ayaneo 或 OneXPlayer 那样的瓦特精确控制。
在测试中,我们为处理器和风扇选择了性能模式。在该模式下,APU 的提升功率为 40 瓦,持续输出功率为 30 瓦。还有一种节能模式,可将数值减半。
需要注意的是,在性能模式下,风扇的优势并没有得到充分发挥,理论上可以实现更高的散热性能。因此,如果你愿意,你可以从Legion Go S 中获得更多。
处理器
联想Legion Go S 的核心是 AMD Ryzen Z2 Go,这是一款拥有四个 Zen 3+ 内核(代号:伦勃朗)的处理器。与 Steam Deck 的 APU(也有四个核心,但基于较早的 Zen 2 架构(代号:梵高))相比,Z2 Go 的基础略显现代。
就性能而言,Legion Go S 比 Steam Deck 略胜一筹。不过,许多现代手持设备都配备了拥有 8 个内核和 16 个线程的 Ryzen 7 处理器,它基于更新的 Phoenix 架构(Zen 4),性能通常要高得多。
不过,对于联想Legion Go S 来说,Ryzen Z2 Go 的性能完全够用,在玩当前游戏时几乎不会成为瓶颈。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3984 - 16546, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Go S |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1088 - 2006, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Go S |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1521 - 6449, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Go S |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (357 - 787, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Go S |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (689 - 2499, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Go S |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (155.1 - 304, n=11, last 2 years) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Go S |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (192 - 588, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (19684 - 66618, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Go S |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3653 - 6143, n=11, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Go S |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (4587 - 13426, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Lenovo Go S |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1348 - 2904, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Go S |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3932 - 11975, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Lenovo Go S |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (875 - 2134, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Go S |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (7.07 - 20.3, n=11, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Go S |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (46.2 - 92.8, n=11, last 2 years) | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (0.4167 - 0.756, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go | Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU | Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Go | Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cinebench R23 | ||||
Multi Core | 5778 | 3984 -31% | 5778 ? 0% | 11993 ? 108% |
Cinebench R20 | ||||
CPU (Multi Core) | 2051 | 1521 -26% | 2051 ? 0% | 4601 ? 124% |
CPU (Single Core) | 390 | 357 -8% | 390 ? 0% | 608 ? 56% |
Cinebench R15 | ||||
CPU Multi 64Bit | 855 | 689 -19% | 855 ? 0% | 1861 ? 118% |
CPU Single 64Bit | 155.1 | 155.1 ? 0% | 248 ? 60% | |
Geekbench 6.3 | ||||
Multi-Core | 4966 | 4587 -8% | 4966 ? 0% | 9195 ? 85% |
Single-Core | 1400 | 1348 -4% | 1400 ? 0% | 2234 ? 60% |
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Go |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (6990 - 25901, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Go () |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (42932 - 109745, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Go () |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1403 - 4847, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Go () |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (45741 - 114294, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Go () |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (5002 - 16640, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Go () |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (23738 - 58482, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Go () |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (21547 - 166333, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Go () |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (356 - 1077, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Go () |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3766 - 13846, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Go () |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (19472 - 49287, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Go () |
系统性能
与其他掌上电脑相比,联想Legion Go S 的处理器性能明显稍弱。集成的 Radeon 显卡也不一定是 "性能怪兽"。
就系统性能而言,Legion Go S 的性能介于 Steam Deck 和性能更强的 Ryzen 7 或 Z1 Extreme 手持设备之间。即便如此,这款掌上电脑的性能还是可以接受的,这也使它成为在扩展坞上日常办公使用的一个选择。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (5219 - 7471, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Go S |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (8427 - 11262, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Go S |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (7213 - 10031, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Go S |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (6350 - 10017, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Lenovo Go S |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (840 - 1847, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (874 - 1719, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (808 - 2077, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (759 - 1610, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
Lenovo Go S |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (188.4 - 323, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Go S |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (107 - 266, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (428 - 895, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 5219 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (32617 - 89385, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Go () | |
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25380 - 100208, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Go () | |
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25596 - 108872, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Go () | |
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Go () | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (105.5 - 139.6, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
Aokzoe A1 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Aokzoe A1 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
联想Legion Go S 采用了 SK hynix 的快速 NVMe SSD。与其他手持设备相比,它能提供最快的 Q8T1 连续读取性能。不过,固态硬盘在长时间使用时往往会出现节流现象,这意味着在持续负载的情况下,其性能会略有下降。不过,它的速度从未下降到无法使用的值。即使在耐久性测试中,其锁定速度仍然高于竞争对手产品中其他固态硬盘的最高速度。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
联想Legion Go S 采用基于 RDNA 2 架构(Rembrandt)的集成图形单元。它有 12 个 CU,相当于 Radeon 680M但在 Z2 Go 中,它仅被称为 "Radeon Graphics"。
与 Steam Deck(APU 只有 8 个 RDNA2 CU)相比,Legion Go S 的图形性能明显更高。即便如此,Legion Go S 的图形性能仍落后于 AMD Radeon 780M在 Z1 Extreme或 Ryzen 7 8840U.
但实际上,Radeon Graphics 为大多数游戏提供了足够的性能,并确保了流畅的游戏体验。
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 102479 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5759 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2229 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 312 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2045 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
如果您希望联想Legion Go S 显示最新的 AAA 级游戏,那么使用 AMD 的 FidelityFX 超分辨率(FSR)通常是最佳选择。或者,也可以将屏幕分辨率设置为 1280 x 800 像素。这在其小巧的显示屏上仍然显得非常清晰,但 FPS 明显更高。
这款掌上电脑在游戏基准测试中的成绩并不令人意外。在性能方面,Legion Go S 的排名低于配备 AMD Radeon 780M 的掌上电脑,但高于 Steam Deck。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion Go -2! | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Kun -1! | |
Aokzoe A1 -2! | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED -4! |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (11.5 - 26.6, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Go S |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (13.5 - 29.1, n=12, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Go S |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (17.8 - 32.8, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED | |
Lenovo Go S |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (18.4 - 32.5, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (30 - 56.1, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Lenovo Go S | |
Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (30.8 - 85, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Lenovo Go S |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Aokzoe A1 | |
Lenovo Legion Go | |
Average of class Handheld / UMPC (24.5 - 50.5, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Ayaneo Kun | |
Lenovo Go S |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 40.7 | 17.8 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 90.6 | 81.3 | 66.1 | 58.7 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 54.3 | 28.9 | 19.9 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 37.2 | 28.9 | 26.5 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 126.9 | 50.2 | 40.8 | 35.9 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 60 | 34 | 32 | 27 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 29.6 | 22.4 | 18.4 | 18.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 27.7 | 20.7 | 16.4 | 13.8 |
排放量 - 可容忍量
噪音排放
在测量联想Legion Go S 的噪音排放时,我们将设备放置在距离测量麦克风 15 厘米的地方。不过,由于游戏时手持设备与耳朵的距离通常为 40 至 50 厘米,因此风扇音量会小 10 至 12 dB(A)。
总的来说,联想Legion Go S 的噪音排放还算可以。在压力测试中,手持设备的噪音曾短暂达到 48.5 dB(A),但大部分时间都在 43 到 44 dB(A) 之间。如果手动将风扇设置到最高级别,噪音会增加到 52 dB(A)。
在正常运行时,风扇的运行通常非常安静。关闭时,从风扇开口处可听到一些安静的线圈呜呜声,这可能是风扇电机造成的。风扇噪音在 800 Hz 时达到最大值,不会发出任何令人不悦的声音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.6 / 25.6 / 28.37 dB(A) |
Load |
| 0 / 48.5 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo Go S Radeon 680M, Z2 Go, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N | Lenovo Legion Go Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM | Ayaneo Kun Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB | Aokzoe A1 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U | Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Steam Deck OLED APU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 13% | 10% | -6% | -3% | 7% | |
off / environment * | 25.6 | 23 10% | 23.3 9% | 23 10% | 24.7 4% | |
Idle Minimum * | 25.6 | 23 10% | 23.3 9% | 25.31 1% | 23.3 9% | 25 2% |
Idle Average * | 25.6 | 23 10% | 23.3 9% | 25.31 1% | 27.1 -6% | 25 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.37 | 25 12% | 27.3 4% | 34.5 -22% | 37.3 -31% | 25 12% |
Load Average * | 37 | 39.2 | 34.9 | 37.4 | 31.3 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 43.1 | |||||
Load Maximum * | 48.5 | 37 24% | 39.2 19% | 50.78 -5% | 46.2 5% | 40.8 16% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46 | 39.2 | 41.2 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
联想Legion Go S 的表面温度完全正常。即使经过大量使用,我们的热像仪和传感器也无法检测到表面温度超过 40 °C。手持设备的手柄和控制装置始终保持凉爽,与环境温度保持一致。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 38.7 °C / 102 F, ranging from 26.6 to 55 °C for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 37.7 °C / 100 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.4 °C / 89 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 9.6 °C / 49 F, compared to the average of 31.4 °C / 89 F for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.8 °C / 85.6 F (-10.2 °C / -18.4 F).
Lenovo Go S AMD Ryzen Z2 Go, AMD Radeon 680M | Lenovo Legion Go AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M | Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M | Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED AMD Steam Deck OLED APU, AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M | Aokzoe A1 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -20% | -2% | -11% | |||
Maximum Upper Side * | 40 | 50 -25% | 44.4 -11% | 41.6 -4% | ||
Maximum Bottom * | 35.5 | 50 -41% | 37.9 -7% | 41.6 -17% | ||
Idle Upper Side * | 32.5 | 33 -2% | 29.9 8% | 34.8 -7% | ||
Idle Bottom * | 29.2 | 33 -13% | 28.3 3% | 33.6 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
联想Legion Go S 的扬声器音量一般。不过,低音明显不足,中音有些过于明显。高音比较均衡。总的来说,它的音效对于休闲游戏玩家和外出使用来说还可以,但还可以做得更好。
Lenovo Go S audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 19% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 19%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 电池寿命长
耗电量
联想Legion Go S 配备了 65 瓦的电源装置。在测试过程中,我们测得的最大功耗为 57.8 瓦。除此之外,该手持设备的功耗在该设备级别中属于典型水平。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo Go S Z2 Go, Radeon 680M, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N, IPS-Grade, 1920x1200, 8" | Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8" | Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, Phison PS5021-E21 512GB, OLED, 1920x1080, 7" | Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, Phison ESMP001TKB5C3, OLED, 1280x800, 7.4" | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 7" | Aokzoe A1 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, , IPS, 1920x1200, 8" | Average AMD Radeon 680M | Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -38% | -5% | 32% | 25% | -18% | -3% | -8% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.3 | 11.5 -117% | 7.3 -38% | 4.5 15% | 4.2 21% | 8.8 -66% | 6.76 ? -28% | 7.65 ? -44% |
Idle Average * | 9.4 | 12 -28% | 8.3 12% | 7.21 23% | 6.1 35% | 11.3 -20% | 8.87 ? 6% | 9.75 ? -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 15.5 | 17.4 -12% | 12.1 22% | 9.66 38% | 6.3 59% | 11.5 26% | 10.5 ? 32% | 13.3 ? 14% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 45.4 | 50.2 -11% | ||||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 47.6 | 51.2 -8% | ||||||
Load Maximum * | 57.8 | 54 7% | 27.8 52% | 67.2 -16% | 64.5 -12% | 70.1 ? -21% | 56.8 ? 2% | |
Load Average * | 45 | 22.86 | 56.6 | 32.1 | 53.2 ? | 39.9 ? | ||
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.6 | 64.1 | 58.3 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
联想Legion Go S 的运行时间因使用场景不同而有很大差异。上网冲浪可持续 8 到 9 个小时,流媒体播放可持续 6 个小时左右。但是,在以最高质量设置玩《赛博朋克 2077》等要求较高的游戏时,电池会在 100 分钟左右耗尽。
即便如此,通过调整图形设置、激活 FSR 和限制 FPS,掌上电脑的电池寿命几乎可以延长一倍。
Lenovo Go S Z2 Go, Radeon 680M, 55.5 Wh | Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 49.2 Wh | Asus ROG Ally X Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh | Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 40 Wh | Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, 48.5 Wh | MSI Claw Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 53 Wh | Valve Steam Deck 1 TB OLED Steam Deck OLED APU, Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, 50 Wh | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 R7 7736U, Radeon 680M, 65 Wh | Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -31% | 53% | -10% | -30% | -18% | 8% | 50% | -3% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 518 | 358 -31% | 949 83% | 465 -10% | 360 -31% | 466 -10% | 559 8% | 777 50% | 503 ? -3% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd | 102 | 124 22% | 73 -28% | 76 -25% | |||||
Gaming | 97 | 252 | 129.2 ? | ||||||
H.264 | 1174 | 568 | 527 | 629 ? | |||||
Load | 128 | 76 | 158 | 79.3 ? | |||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 57 | 86.5 ? | |||||||
Reader / Idle | 1393 | 861 ? |
Notebookcheck 总评分
如果不考虑其价格和计算能力,你会发现这款掌上电脑手感极佳,设计也很吸引人。电池续航时间也不错。不过,考虑到该掌上电脑的计算能力,其目前 729.99 美元的价格有点太高了。蒸汽甲板 Steam Deck OLED1 TB 售价为 799.99 美元,性能与之相当。这自然会引发一个问题,即 Windows 许可证是否证明其价格合理。联想Legion Go S 也将推出搭载 SteamOS 系统的产品,如果不带 Windows 许可的价格合适,它可能会成为 Steam Deck 的有力替代品。不过,由于搭载了 Windows 系统,联想Legion Go S 还必须与其他 Windows 手持设备竞争。 华硕的 ROG Ally和最初的 联想Legion Go是价格相近的强劲竞争对手。
Lenovo Go S
- 02/13/2025 v8
Marc Herter
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.